Artur, I highly recommend taking a look at the Battle Osowiec Fortress

@thisdangoriginaldude1471

3 жыл бұрын

I think he has reacted to the Simple history one but the full story I don't think he has

@bryanmcnair4396

3 жыл бұрын

Bryah

@roskcity

3 жыл бұрын

Attack of the dead men

@vanderwallstronghold8905

3 жыл бұрын

I can hear the song playing in my head

Hope every body has a good day today

@butcherybutcher8868

3 жыл бұрын

Danke Товарищ!

@jakeshurbitt5681

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you @headears I hope you as well have a good day. Love seeing these type of comments from people. It made me smile seeing someone indirectly telling me they hoped I had a good day not knowing that my day was kinda bad an busy at work because the morning shift was slow so they decided to leave early only causing the closing shift guy an I to be short staffed for the the next 4 hours. Thanks @Headears

Please look at Jamsheed the rpg god boss

@DJC_2003

3 жыл бұрын

Yesssss😂😂😂

@jackjackson3874

3 жыл бұрын

@@DJC_2003 hahahaha

@faze_fake6962

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah

@caiozzzo7099

3 жыл бұрын

Uppppp

Also Russia only has one operational Typhoon left. The US has 14 Ohio class SSBNs in service right now.

@BlackEpyon

3 жыл бұрын

Three. The Dimitri Donskoy is still in active service, but the Arkhangelsk and Severstal are in reserve.

@treddymuongi1051

3 жыл бұрын

they are being retired in favour of new Borei class submarines

@oleshkapilmeshka0474

3 жыл бұрын

Ok

@BlackEpyon

3 жыл бұрын

@@treddymuongi1051 I hope they keep at least one for a floating museum. Anything with the title of "world's largest" deserves to avoid the shipbreakers.

@BlackEpyon

3 жыл бұрын

@Saint Stalin The Navy doesn't have generals. They have admirals.

Hope you are healthy! We all still support you!

I am thoroughly convinced that Rohje watches give superpowers

@DarkChaos87

3 жыл бұрын

They feel like they do. I have the Antarctica Limited Edition. So bloody comfortable.

My Dad worked on subs and now aircraft carriers at the naval ship yard in Norfolk and Portsmouth

Happy to see that your still posting

wow has this channel advanced been here since 12k subs and you’ve come so far love from Macedonia

I am from New Zealand and South Africa

@qhamukkh148

3 жыл бұрын

@Hermandaniël Diedericks u are afrikaans oki

@qhamukkh148

3 жыл бұрын

@Hermandaniël Diedericks yes

The Typhoon class is actually two complete submarine hulls welded together.

@johnj.spurgin7037

3 жыл бұрын

So it's a submarine Catamaran.

@mrnickbig1

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnj.spurgin7037 , sort of. What looks like the single hull is actually a fairing over the real hulls.

@johnj.spurgin7037

3 жыл бұрын

@@mrnickbig1 presumably to minimize the sensor profile?

@erikskole7669

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnj.spurgin7037 the twin hull design was done for the ability to carry the weapons. Each pressure hull has the same beam as an La class. 688. 33 ft with several tunnels between. Each hull was a fully independent submarine.

Yes!! Random accordion segments are the best segments! Glad to see you're keeping on, man. I can relate, I'm just coming away from a hard time in my life and starting to recover. Best of luck, my dude. One day at a time.

I haven’t been on KZread in awhile and I’m glad to see you’re still doing well. I’m excited to start catching up on videos again.

So glad that you are back. Bigger, stronger, more beautiful just like your submarines.

Amazing machines. The main problem with them was that they were too noisy and US/British attack subs could find and track them. The USSR also had the problem of being less technologically advanced than the USA. Thus their equipment often had to be much larger to obtain similar results to the US's equipment. They could not build a Boomer as good as the Ohio class unless it was MUCH larger. Even then they could not make it near as silent as US subs.

@crusadetime6980

3 жыл бұрын

They would absolutely shred during ww1

@1IbramGaunt

3 жыл бұрын

@@crusadetime6980 well yes, as would pretty much ANY modern technology if you somehow transported it back in time over a century ago, so what was your point?

@JohnLeePettimoreIII

3 жыл бұрын

Except that British sub that plowed into one. 😆😆

@protonneutron9046

3 жыл бұрын

@@JohnLeePettimoreIII Um, NOPE. Collisions happen when after detection the sub follows too close and the sub being followed does an unexpected maneuver.

@midship_nc

3 жыл бұрын

@@protonneutron9046 crazy ivan

It's time, Captain... It's time. Time indeed.

@APixieNinja

3 жыл бұрын

One if my top 3 favorite movies.

@DrForrester87

3 жыл бұрын

@@APixieNinja oh yeah

Your content is great keep up with the good work!

Hey Artur, so glad to see you!

Artur, I hope you are well. I think we all miss you and your videos, I know I do. Blessings from a veteran in America 🙂

Just wanted to say hi and tell you I love your videos and your energy you put out, all good stuff

Keep it up buddy. Love the content

Give me a ping Vasily, one ping only please.... - Marko Ramius.

Artur needs to hit 1 mil subscribers already 🙏🏿

Love the content you upload,keep up the good work my fellow Estonian, Aloha from big island of Hawaii

yes bro i needed you to post put boost my feelings

Dude has some solid accordion skills

Good to see ya man

Hey Artur Mind reacting to the F 14 tomcat?

@victorwaddell6530

3 жыл бұрын

F14 Tomcat and the A6 Intruder .

@sejongthegreat3044

3 жыл бұрын

Seconded. This is only the second best airframe ever developed, only because it doesn't carry alternating thrust capabilities, nor was it built for it. A modern F-14 with Modern avionics would outstrip the stealth envelope by a margin of a factor of 4 and a dog fighting capability by a factor of over 10.

@sejongthegreat3044

3 жыл бұрын

Imagine running a stealth aircraft at a level of angels 2-4 and getting pinged by a flying turkey from 4k miles away with a radar almost half the size of your airframe from 10 angels goings mach 1.2

@sejongthegreat3044

3 жыл бұрын

Then it fires 2 fire and forget missles with a closing speed with a kill speed of over mach 10 with a 15 second gap with a fixed radar lock.

@thirdhorizon6964

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, the Tomcat is a magnificent jet. You really need to take a look at it, it gave us air superiority over the Mig 28s for years! This is something that Estonia could one day buy, a lot easier than you could realistically purchase some of the others, and it's a great aircraft! I absolutely guarantee that your country would benefit 1000% from having these jets in your arsenal. Been around since the 80's or so, but you've seen enough videos about our aircraft to know that they can be old as dirt and still hella devastating . I mean it's not equipped with all the stealth, but it has got extremely long-range missiles that can fired from further than most aircraft. It's very agile, it's made for dogfighting. And the variable sweep wings...(it has wings that move, spread out, or fold like a bird)Ooooh. Even if your country only had three of these, the intel you can gain from the radar alone... Let's just say that you need these just like you need some Warthogs! Check it out, you'll love it! Also, TopGun...

Just joined your Patreon, G'Day from Australia!

There is only 1 of these Subs in active duty (TK-208) with 2 decommissioned but are still on the reserve list, and 3 were withdrawn from active service between 1996-99 and scrapped.

Hang in there. You will eventualy start to feel better

I love ur videos

The US has the Ohio Class which is more capable then the Typhoon class. Also the US has 14 of them with 12 active at all times. While the other 2 are in port for upgrades or repair.

@hiteshadhikari

3 жыл бұрын

No

@hiteshadhikari

3 жыл бұрын

You confused it with akula class which is also called typhpon

You should review the F14 Tomcat, most iconic plane ever built if you're an american.

@protonneutron9046

3 жыл бұрын

A really good plane but not really iconic. An Iconic plane is something like the P-51.

@DjJ0SHWA

3 жыл бұрын

@@protonneutron9046 F14 is definitly iconic bud

@protonneutron9046

3 жыл бұрын

@@DjJ0SHWA Within the USN but not broadly. Children see Top Gun and think it is iconic because that is their limited world view. The movies.

@DjJ0SHWA

3 жыл бұрын

@@protonneutron9046 That's where you're wrong. Not sure where you get your "world view" from. But as someone who isn't even American, I can confirm, most people love the Tomcat

@loganblanton843

3 жыл бұрын

P-51 F-4 A-10 F-22 B-17 B-29 B-52 then F-14

Got my hat in the mail last week! Can't wait to see my name on (hopefully) the next vid!

Russian military aircraft have NATO code designations too. The MiG-21 is called Fishbed and the MiG-29 is called Fulcrum

16:22 "A real superpower on the sea, more so than the US." US navy: "Heresy Detected!!!"

@tysonpruitt2252

3 жыл бұрын

The americans are stronger than russia in nearly every way on land in air in sea and in space there is no comparison

@tysonpruitt2252

3 жыл бұрын

@@eatinsomtin9984 population isnt everything the us has stronger air force russia cant even affrord with their entire military budget

@tysonpruitt2252

3 жыл бұрын

@@eatinsomtin9984 and the nave far stronger for america more advanced land vehicles and more money to produce the only thing russia beats them in is number of nukes everything else is irrelevant rissia cant simply afford to keep up with the us

@user-oq2ez5lz8w

3 жыл бұрын

@@tysonpruitt2252 yeah but invading would actually be pretty hard.

@tysonpruitt2252

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-oq2ez5lz8w yes invading either country would be nearly impossible without wiping out the population with nukes there would be no force that could take on 300 million americans that would have access to guns and ammo and the russions with millions of people armed america would be harder due to its gun loving population being so high but russia would also be nearly impossible especially with how cold most of the country is

There was an ad on CL for a typhoon for sale in my city, but it was taken down.

According to Google the U.S. has 77 nuclear submarines. Russia has 33 with 24 currently operational.

The twin hull sounds similar to the earlier I-400 submarine. It was the largest sub of WWII, Japanese, and was a real marvel of engineering at the time.

Please look at Iraq War part 1 and 2 by The Armchair Historian.

yes the intro is perfect.

There was another reason to put all those luxuries on the Typhoon. The Soviet navy used conscript sailors. So they were taking a bunch of people who might not want to be there, putting them in a metal box and sending them to the bottom of the ocean for six months. With a lot of nukes. It was really important to keep their morale up.

Hey Artur! You mentioned your personal experience with trucks while serving your country in the Estonian Army. Check out the U.S. Army's new trucks (i.e. the new JLTV that is replacing the old hummve line.) And the other vehicles like the MAT-V and HMTV types! The minesweeper variant of vehicles (Like the VMMH) is very interesting.

I love submarines, maybe you could do a reaction to WW2 U-Boats, or the battle of verdun in WW1. Also, if you enjoyed this you could check out the USS Barb from WW2. If conducted the only land attack on mainland Japan and had a rocket launcher Gatling gun

@greatdude7279

3 жыл бұрын

Uboats were not submarines but submersibles. Submersibles are surface ships that can travel underwater for short period of time their speed is also slower underwater then on the surface. Sumbarines are ships that primary travel underwater and their speed is higher underwater then on the surface.

@connor0959

3 жыл бұрын

@@greatdude7279 Yup, I know that. I said submarines because that was the primary focus of the video. Both are very interesting, but my knowledge is based more around U-Boats, which is why I chose to group the two.

US has 14 Ohio Class and is building 12 new Columbia Class Nuclear Ballistic Missile subs

It is good to see you Artur. The sub always get the best food, they see the movies first, etc. They try to make it very good to make up for being underwater so much. They share a bunk with another so they have half as many bunks. One person is on duty while the other one is sleeping.

@iKvetch558

3 жыл бұрын

If I am not mistaken, the Typhoon is so big that each man does get his own bunk...but I could be wrong. On the American Ohio class the crew do get their own bunks, I am pretty sure. Though there must be situations where bunks do have to be shared.

@jackofalltrades7469

3 жыл бұрын

@@iKvetch558 That was the practice back when I was in the navy, maybe it has changed.

@iKvetch558

3 жыл бұрын

My understanding is that there were treaties that limited them, and that it also made the warheads more vulnerable to theft and mishap. Not sure if the treaties are still in force, so it may not be against the rules anymore.

Let’s go from the biggest submarine to the biggest battleship Yamato

Artur, NATO designations were sometimes different than Russia's because they didn't always know which whip they were tracking when a NATO submarine stumbled across the sub during sea trials, so the acoustic signature was given a designation while the sub was tracked, when the first one was encountered she became the 20th unique signature in the computer. 6 Akula/Typhoons were built by USSR but 18 Ohios were built by the USA. Akulas had 20 missiles with 10 warheads, 100,000 ton TNT blast each, Ohios had 24 missiles with 8 to 12 warheads. So the USA was out building the USSR on a lot of stuff.

I remember Japan doing something similar with a battleship in ww2. Didn't go so well for them

@angulion

3 жыл бұрын

Actually 2, Yamato and her sister ship Musashi.

@jimvanderpoel4467

3 жыл бұрын

@@angulion they just found the musashi a few years ago

yess

2:00 that's hilarious surprise

Technical info... The Typhoon has two nuclear reactors, yes. But each has a power output of 190MWt (Mega Watts thermal). Chernobyl's reactors were 3200MWt. In this case, size matters. :)

Artur, watch a video on either recon/force recon marine training or MARSOC

Stay Cool !! 🇪🇪

last time i was this early eastern europe was one country

@HyperzonMusicalies

3 жыл бұрын

Quiet please.

U should review the Bradley IFV or the Merkava IV Barak

It just says one View but there's actually two more comments

I think you should look at behind the scenes with the British Army in Estonia

Hello again, Artur...just a couple of things to keep in mind. First, around 2:00 into the video, you comment on the Typhoon having 2 reactors and Chernobyl having 4...but the total power output of the reactors on the sub is tiny compared to that of Chernobyl. The Typhoon has 2 reactors with a total of 190 megawatts of thermal output, while Chernobyl had 4 reactors with a total of 12,800 megawatts. Also, the operational range of the latest model of the Trident II SLBM that America uses is over 12,000 kilometers...the range they stated in the video is for the original version of the Trident I missile.

@BlackEpyon

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, the Sturgeon was technically a better missile when these two classes were new, but with the Ohios equipped with Trident II's and the Sturgeons retired, the remaining active Typhoon is little more than a test bed for the Bulava missiles for the newer Borei class subs.

i would love to see the italian tanks and armored cars in Artur Rehi channel

Yes Typhoon is bigger, but was it really? Typhoon class submarine: (6 completed) Number completed: 6 Missile Type: RSM-52 Per Warhead size: 100-200KT Number of missiles on board: 20 Number of warheads per missile: 10 Calculation using maximum size Number of warheads: 10 Number of targets: 200 Kilo tonnes of power: 40,000 (no of missiles x warheads per x KT per) US Ohio Class Submarines (18 completed) Missile type: Trident D5 Per Warhead Size: 90-455 KT Number of missiles on board: 24 Missiles. Number of warheads per missile: 8-14 (more warheads, lower KT) Calculation using maximum size (smallest number of warheads) Number of warheads: 8 Number of targets: 192 Kilo tonnes of power: 455 Total kilo tonnes: 87,360 (no of missiles x warheads per x KT per) I may be biased though, I served on the USS Ohio.

Submarine collisions probably happened because one submarine was tracking the other one. The US went to great lengths to track the Soviet submarines. A video on SOSUS could be interesting, I would imagine it gave the US a huge leg up in the ASW during the cold war.

@erikskole7669

3 жыл бұрын

Yes sosus was effictive, but there was a large lag time in Intel that was detected. Not good for real time info.

Please do a video on the f/a 18

Soviet era Reactors were of lower quality, and were of lower efficiency. They were larger and required larger cooling plants. This increased the size of the nuclear plant. This actually benefits the weapons plant by a large margin, because it makes the square area they had to add payloads and magazines by that much more, not to mention crew compliment spaces and crew mess spaces. Things were more spacious for crews where larger class submarines like these where they had to compliment inefficient designs with larger frames.

We're all aware how powerful military crafts are, but the 6ft of ice it can break through still surprised me.

I remember “The hunt for the Red October”!!

Artur Rehi is Estonia youtuber.

The cia used remote viewing to find out the sub was being made. It was even in a building that didnt have access to the water and they had to dig out a channel.

Hi Arthur, I am an Italian guy, you should review the TEK special forces from Hungary.

Hey

@choco5137

3 жыл бұрын

Hi

@autumnmoreno4369

3 жыл бұрын

Hello

@Hamadpro12

3 жыл бұрын

Choco513 hi

@Hamadpro12

3 жыл бұрын

Autumn Moreno hi

@choco5137

3 жыл бұрын

Hamadpro 12 hi to you

You should react to the Leclerc Tank

Please take a look on the Bismarck (Battleship) or the Yamato

No idea animation is back!

@stonecold007

3 жыл бұрын

Yay! 🇱🇹

@HyperzonMusicalies

3 жыл бұрын

Jah! 🇪🇪

@stonecold007

3 жыл бұрын

🇪🇪 🇱🇻 🇱🇹

You should check out the desert storm video from opertaions room its really interesting

Akula name had already been given by the US to some fast Russian attack submarine. So they had to come up with another name, Typhoon.

I know they aren't in use anymore but you should react to the iowa class battleships. They served from ww2 to the gulf war. They were deactivated and deactivated multiple times

I highly recommend reacting to the Ohio Class now that you've watched the Typhoon. I think then you'll see that the Russians have no such edge in submarines. Especially when you realize the US built 18 Ohios to the 6 Russian Typhoons and the Ohios could be argued to be just, or close to, as effective as a Typhoon with their armament. Not to mention those 18 Ohios are still active today.

I think a more interesting comparison or just a video of one or the other would be in air defense s 400 and patriot batteries

Please watch T14 armata vs M 1 Abrams by red effect it's really good

Can you react to the Battle of Marawi? It was a very unique battle.

Oh Artur. I recommend doing a video of the Russian sub class Alfa. The Ferrari of the sub world. A reported top speed 47+ knots submerged (was briefed about it when I was in the navy a long time ago. It was the reason that the US Navy developed the MK48 ADCAP torpedo, top speed 55 knots, 2600 ft depth. also a good vid thought for the torpedo itself). It had a full titanium hull, had a liquid metal primary loop in the reactor, and the Russians claimed back on the day that it could dive to a possible 4k feet 2k test depth, but wiki says test depth is about 1200. That and it's just a pretty good looking piece of kit. Aloha from Hawaii bro keep the vids coming.

I recommend,watching epic history tv-Napoleonic wars.

Crazy ivan is how you colide

You should react to the tsar bomb explosion vid

Reactors can have different sizes, but yes, these are still sizeable.

I highly recommend you to Reaction to Rail gunner rush

Hey Artur, you should do a show on the new 6th generation US fighter, I hear it can go into orbit, has energy direction weapons, it has drone escorts. The US created a new type of realistic simulator to take production/engineering time down 90%.....

There was a much bigger submmarine called Hawai Class - and the first one was called Volcano. It was built in a valley called "Mariana Trench". See I am expert.

I would like to see you react to SLAM (Supersonic Low Altitude Missile) AKA: America's Big Stick.

Please react to the USS pensilvania submarine.

Check out, Battle of Grunwald. By: The Armchair Historian

Interesting

This sub is still the coolest. It was actually smart. Huge so it can basically just be a nuclear missile base parked off the shore of your enemy and strike within 15-30 minutes maybe faster. And stay there for 120 days and do it on comfortable accommodations it actually nice. If you look at Ohio vs typhoon you'll see Ohio has pipes and everything all over and in typhoon it's all hidden and clean looking and you can walk around without having to suck or hit your head. Actually very nice to do. Just park 15 miles from Washington D.C. and have a sauna maybe a swim when not on watch. Goto the weight room. Goto the room that's made to look like it has windows and is good for the mind. It really does have the best idea for moral in every way.

I love that flag.

React to the iraq war animated it just came out. also the v22 osprey

Artur, I know you look at alot of American things but I think you should look at a Battle many don’t talk about when mentioning the Wars. The Battle of The Alamo.

Typhoon are big in size, but the U.S. Navy’s Ohio-class subs are far more powerful.

@gojkokravljaca7817

3 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@susanmaggiora4800

3 жыл бұрын

JJD76 So they can destroy the world 10 times over? If you can do it once, being ‘more powerful’ becomes pretty moot, my guy..

@evancammisa338

3 жыл бұрын

@@susanmaggiora4800 typhoons are amazing but to loud in case of a real war it would be destroy before it got a chance to shoot them

@adriantsien1867

3 жыл бұрын

Or Virginia Class.

@user-oq2ez5lz8w

3 жыл бұрын

How

Arthur you should review steve1989's review of the Estonian military MRE

I ordered and received my hat months ago but my state still isn't listed. Interesting.