The EPA needs to get some pick axes and shovels and clean up that train wreck not stand around with a clip board clean air won’t matter if you can’t drink any water

@charlesrodriguez7984

Жыл бұрын

Fr. EPA is a bunch of hypocrites. Go after the industry not the individual

@Dieselpwr

Жыл бұрын

@@charlesrodriguez7984 Agreed the industry has lawers and money though that would be too difficult

EPA needs to get sued asap after failing East Palestine. Those citizen’s should’ve never be allowed to return.

the fucking epa made a guy in a Rural area pave his road beacause it was road base and making to much dust government overreach. but lets keep launching rockets through the atmosphere thats ok

I wonder if it cost's the consumer anywhere from $2000 to $5000 to fix issues with emissions problems on diesel trucks if they are willing to make the manufacture's warranty the emissions parts for say 10 years due to the cost. The difference in cost to tear it all off verses fixing it only to have to fix it again later on down the road is not feasible for the average person. For for example they go after someone who doesn't have the funds to repair a truck that they paid over $70,000 for and have to pay out that much more to repair a failed emissions equipment. BUT they allow states to spray brine which is proven more corrosive and causes hidden fail points not to mention poisoning the waterways with more potent solution. Blows my mind that they don't go after the producers of the brine for creating hazardous environment for drivers due to the hidden corrosion that eats brake lines etc.. it makes no sense.

@kubikariYOU

Жыл бұрын

It can cost $20,000 for the emissions control parts for a Dodge Ram. About half that for a Ford diesel.

@jeffreyhebda6709

7 ай бұрын

Brine is a nasty product. Thank u for bringing this to light .

Thanks for all the good info love your podcast.

@TheDieselPodcast

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching!

Great podcast Patrick!

@TheDieselPodcast

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for listening!

I definitely learned a lot from what he said. The EPA never want to give out info unless it's about a company that they shut down. I'm in California and I get numerous calls asking for help to get their trucks back to stock, but there aren't enough parts cause of supply problems, so they say.

@royroddy9545

Жыл бұрын

W a sw d a while d aaaas

Are they tracking the individual purchaser? How come you don't ask him this one basic question we all want to know????.

I am really glad that I have a tuning program and that I am able to make the parts myself for my own vehicles because unless the EPA is disbanded which is not going to happen because government never gets reigned in I can do it to my own truck and it's a good thing because it was morons running around showing off blowing black smoke on Facebook and KZread that kicked all of this off had we done it quietly responsibly and respectfully we would not be in this position

Texas doesn’t test emissions for diesel

@TheDieselPodcast

10 ай бұрын

That hasn’t stopped the EPA from pursuing civil/criminal penalties against companies in the state.

the true enthusiast knows that emissions on will never be the same. i will also NEVER agree with emissions on being "just as good" or "better" because if one engine goes through regen, recirculates exhaust gas, and has all this crazy back pressure and then another identical engine with no regen, no egr, and a straight pipe that one is undoubtly going to outflow and overall just be a better engine than the one with all the stuff on there. i know i don't sound crazy educated in this but i am just trying to summarize. i feel extremely strongly on this stuff.

In the 70's the car manufacturers were required to keep exhaust emissions cleaner, so what did they do?, they added plumbing and engine driven smog pumps to engines, that diluted the tailpipe emissions. No real reduction just an endplay around the new regulations... made by politicians that couldn't engineer a toothpic. What they never considered was how much polution the regulations created. Manufacture and design of the hardware on the engines took energy, rescources and creation of those parts all made emissions. Whats worse is, those pumps that were an engineering nightmare, are only in use the first five minutes of the engine running, since the catilitic converter was hot enough to complete the task of burning hydrocarbons. At which point the plumbing and hardware and smog pump are just dead weight that have to be lugged around for a hundred thousand miles or so just burning extra fuel to have them along. No imagine how much worse the EPA is screwing up the diesel regulations. One last note. Changing fuel to 50 cetane level instead of 40 cetane would achieve 90% of emissions requirements without having to add insane levels of engineering to vehicles emissions systems and achieve better fuel milage. Govt. making toothpics cartoon. kzread.info/dash/bejne/fKJozZSNgKywlpM.html

I just came back from a used auto auction, 3 deleted trucks went across the block and sold way higher than blue book. Went straight to a used car lot I'm sure. Many dealers dont care I guess. Or maybe they are so low on inventory they want whatever

@c.i.m.1600

Жыл бұрын

I'd definitely rather a deleted truck.

@charlesrodriguez7984

Жыл бұрын

@@c.i.m.1600I’d rather drive a deleted diesel too. Even if it just had EGR it’s still better than DEF.

Soon they are going to say no trucks older than 10 years old can't be on the road.

What year model does all of these regulations start to enter the EPA’s radar? Or, what’s the latest model of diesel that can be modified without having to worry about being hassled?

@theq4602

Жыл бұрын

Technically anything built before the clean air act.

Diesel Podcast 👍👏 Awesome Brother ☠️ 🏁 👊

Alright, this is your huge chance!

I saw a video a while back, where a news reporter checked out a guy that bought a glider/ almost new truck that he repowered with a non EPA engine and trans. He said that if you buy a truck with crap on it that all you have to do is change 2 defective running gear components and yor good to go! What do you know about this? And is this still in effect?

@davidzook8569

Жыл бұрын

A glider is not just any truck you want to repower. It MUST have a glider VIN, if not it is illegal to repower with an engine complying with emissions older than the original truck.

Who pays for the EPAs attorneys? Taxpayers? We lose ultimately! When are people going to wake up? We shouldn't have to pay any attorneys anything to live freely.

@SR-lz7kl

Жыл бұрын

Americans won’t unite, I’ve never seen it on simpler issues. So sad

@c.i.m.1600

Жыл бұрын

​@@SR-lz7kl Howdy, I think many have been literally brainwashed. It's quite sad.

@c.i.m.1600

Жыл бұрын

Howdy, I agree 💯 I fear people won't wake up or are afraid of their own government. It almost seems like some have been literally brainwashed. It's really sad.

@SR-lz7kl

Жыл бұрын

@@c.i.m.1600 Exactly right, and our leaders know that most Americans are afraid and brainwashed, they laugh at it actually

@josepires4345

Жыл бұрын

There’s a reason why Europe doesn’t follow these type EPA requirements, people stand together and the politicians are scared shitless of when people stick together, over here?…not so much.

Great job having Stewart on again Patrick. I finally got some type of explanation on why my 5 tuning violations is criminal and not civil.

@TheDieselPodcast

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for listening Gordon!

Ajn 2030. Grandkids jail for spinning tire. 😢 no fun.

👍🏻

If any part of the government cared about cleaner air and emissions, we would use more trains and fewer trucks. They also make citizens suffer while letting countless chemical companies do as they please for the payoff.

1:04:55 I unknowingly bought a deleted truck from a dealer. How can I get my money back

Ok lets look at laws are not for you nor ,is the law ment for you. The state and the fed has to be in line , and vehicle is a commercial purpose automobiles. We drive automobiles and that includes cars an trucks. And our private automobile is yours to do what you want. Learn the definitions, they can not change them an wakeup.

The train in ohio did not explode, it was set fire and told to let it burn by the transportation dept. And buttijudge

@moki123g

Жыл бұрын

Aside from your infantile insult, It was deemed safer to burn off the chemicals rather than let them leach into the environment. Why? Because the combustion products are FAR less hazardous and much more short-lived than the raw, un-burnt chemical. If you are going to comment on something that you clearly know nothing about in the future, try not to be so profoundly ignorant.

@tomking5822

Жыл бұрын

@moki123g that is a bullshit answer because the train was not burning as bad before it was set fire second the transportation dept. set it afire ,third the manager from east Liverpool hazard waste official stated Cleary on national television that the materials should have never been st on fire ,the were to have been contained the fire exhausted and sent to the proper facility for disposal check your facts idiot

I remember the 1960’s when every diesel truck and bus bellowed soot. We all had no choice but to breath it. I remember not being able to see the mountains 15 miles away because of air pollution. I know and agree that personal freedom is important but sometimes the greater good is even more important. Diesels are going through their infancy on emission control devices and there are problems. Gasoline emission control devices have actually improved performance and fuel economy and the air is much cleaner. Diesels are now where gas vehicles were in the 90,s. There are three times more vehicles on the road today vs the 60,s and I can always see those mountains. We will get there with diesel emissions too. It will just take more time.

@fluffykittynoodles

Жыл бұрын

The problem with this line of thinking is that a majority of owners don't modify their vehicles. It's a small number that remove emissions equipment. Also, the emissions equipment that's in use on these vehicles is old tech, outdated and inefficient. It raises the likelihood of failure/reduction in reliability with the vehicle when there are better options out there. On top of that, the infrastructure that was required to install these systems(thinking about DEF specifically) and then maintain them has put more vehicles on the road, more production plants into business and more overseas involvement with shipping than ever. It's a racket, there are better ways to make vehicles cleaner while not killing their reliability/performance all while preserving the environment.

@jimm2442

Жыл бұрын

@@fluffykittynoodles I disagree with you on the performance portion of your statement. Look at a 2003 7.3 liter Ford Diesel. It had very little emissions equipment. Compare that to the 6.7 Ford diesel of today. The HP and Torque of the 7.3 is 275hp and 525 ft lbs of torque. The 6.7 is 500 hp and 1200 ft lbs of torque.. The 6.7 has all the emission equipment and still produces so much more power. You have a valid point on reliability. I would be interested to know what you feel is a better way.

@ThanksHero

11 ай бұрын

@@jimm2442and if you removed the emission equipment on that new 6.7 PSD it would make even more power and get better fuel economy while doing it.

@georgesrisomsak9650

11 ай бұрын

​​@@jimm2442you're comparing apples to oranges. The 6.7 platform uses a MUCH higher pressure fuel setup, capable of costing $10-12k to replace when the pump goes bad. And it will. Not to mention ALL of the other reliability problems with the 6.7. Scr failures, def heater failure, exhaust manifold leaks, turbo failures, egt sensor failures, dropped exhaust valves, upper oil pan leaks and on and on and on. The 6.7 has a LOT of flaws. The truck it's installed in also, has a LOT of problems. Air conditioning problems requiring dash removal, water intrusion and leaks in multiple areas, sync system issues, blind spot radar issues, bliss camera failures, and on and on and on. New trucks are garbage. I know, as a certified Ford diesel tech of 20 years. Unfortunately. I used to be that guy saying Ford and Toyota is quality. Now, they are all junk. Especially Ford. To compare a superior machine in quality, fit, finish, engineering, value, to a heaping pile of new shit is laughable. $100k +++ piles of shit to be exact. 😂 Never, I'll drive my old smokey 7.3 and 6.0 trucks and use less fuel, and get incredible value for the hard earned $ I made. Go after the government vehicle's of all sorts (they don't run ANY emissions because of reliability) cargo ships and airline industries.

What are you know? I’m thinking about buying my first 379 at Sandusky Ohio. It’s a 1999 they got other units and I’m looking at 2006. In that realm I mean it is it even worth spending 60 grand 70 grand on something that the governments going to take away from you within the next 5 to 10 years I really need to know because it’s not just me involved it’s my wife we’re doing this together and I

@uglytruckbuilds1839

Жыл бұрын

Ohio truck sales is shady, they throw together junk that looks good. Be warned

@davidzook8569

Жыл бұрын

If you're running a profitable business and buying a truck this year, ten years out doesn't make much difference. By that time you will either have another truck by choice or someone will come up with a bolt on solution or you'll be able to repower with a newer engine but one that's old enough to meet the minimum requirements. An example would be a 95 379 with a 3406B being repowered with a 3406E then maybe in 2010 it gets a C15 Acert, by 2030 someone comes up with a bolt on solution and suddenly your C15 Acert meets minimum requirements.