ENGINE BALANCE: Inline 3 vs. Inline 4 vs. Inline 5 vs. Inline 6

Автокөліктер мен көлік құралдары

The engine block that you see has a stroke of 77mm, which means that the piston covers 77mm of travel during the full length of it's up and down motion. By this logic, rotating the crankshaft 90 degrees from top dead center should set the piston at half the stroke, in our example the piston should cover exactly 38.5 mm. Yet, as you can clearly is here it doesn't'. During the first 90 degrees of the crankshafts travel the piston covers more than half the stroke.
So why is this happening? It's happening because the piston is connected to the crankshaft by a connecting rod and the connecting rod doesn't just go up and down in a simple reciprocating motion. Instead the connecting rod steps out from a linear path of travel both left and right.
What is primary engine balance? The source of primary balance or imbalance is simply the mass of the reciprocating parts of your enigine, which means that your pistons are the greatest potential source of a primary engine imbalance. An engine with an odd number of pistons can have a primary imbalance if the reciprocating mass of the odd piston isn't properly canceled out by the other pistons.
We're starting with one that has the least number of cylinders the inline three engine. When it comes to inline three engines most of them have their crank throws 120 degrees angled away from each other. Such an angle distributes the crank throws evenly across the crankshaft which then enables an even distribution of cylinder firings.
The inline three engine has good primary balance due to the even spacing of it's crank throws. If you look at the crank from the front this becomes even more apparent. What about the secondary balance? Wel l that's actually pretty good too, because the three pistons are always in different parts of the upper and lower half of the cranks rotation and no two pistons move together. This sort of disperses the negative effects of the unequal piston speeds in the different halves of the cranks rotation.
But if your gut feeling is telling you there has to be a problem with an odd number of cylinders, you were right. And the issue is discovered by drawing a line across the middle of the inline three cylinder. Notice anything weird? The force on this side is obviously unequal to the force on this side. the engine's center of gravity is at the middle of cylinder two and the unequal forces at different sides of the center of gravity mean that the engine rocks back and forth or end to end.
So how do we fix the unbalance? Well the solution to fixing an unbalance in any kind of reciprocating piston engine can come in the form of a balancing shaft. In the case of the inline three we need a single balance shaft with weights which moves in the direction opposite to the piston travel to balance out the the end to end rocking of the inline three.
But this doesn't mean that all inline three engines have a balancing shaft. A balancing shaft adds cost, weight and friction which is why most manufacturers will try to avoid it whenever possible. Ford's 1.0 liter three cylinder ecoboost engine is an example of a pretty smooth inline three cylinder that has no balancing shaft. Instead the engine uses an unbalanced flywheel and crank pulley and highly engineered engine mounts to cancel out most of the front to back rocking.
Now let's add one more cylinder to the mix and talk about the inline four cylinder engine.
The inline four also has perfect primary balance as you can see each upward motion of a piston is canceled out by the downward motion of another piston. When two go up, two pistons go down.
As you can see when two piston are at the top two pistons are at the bottom this means that the secondary balance forces associated with unequal speeds at the top and bottom part of the cranks rotation aren't just present in the inline four they are in fact augmented by the fact that the pistons move in pairs.
The easiest way to understand the balance associated with the inline 5 engine is to think of it as the inline three's big brother. They share the same balance genetics, with the inline 5 being the larger more powerful version.
What about he inline six? Well, it's an inline three standing in front of a mirror. It's that simple. Unlike any of our previous configurations the inline six has a perfect primary and secondary balance. We have an even number of pistons and no two pistons occupy the same position of the stroke at one time.
A special thank you to my patrons:
Daniel
Peter Della Flora
Daniel Morgan
William
Richard
Pepe
Brian Durning
Andrew Ruud
D4A merch: teespring.com/en-GB/d4a-merch
Patreon: / d4a
00:00 Secondary balance
03:00 Primary balance
04:19 Inline 3
10:08 Inline 4
13:49 Inline 5
16:26 Inline 6
#d4a #enginebootcamp #enginebalance

Пікірлер: 1 300

  • @d4a
    @d4a3 жыл бұрын

    Let's hang out: superpeer.com/driving4answers Support d4a: driving-4-answers-shop.fourthwall.com/ Revive the five: amzn.to/3r0ERaH Build the four: amzn.to/2KyP6Cb Read the six: amzn.to/37n8rzc I couldn't find anything for the three so you get this: amzn.to/2ITRQtD

  • @reclaimerauto7359

    @reclaimerauto7359

    3 жыл бұрын

    This is the world's rarest model rx7, ever heard of it? www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-non-technical-pictures-198/restamped-mazda-rx7-1148475/

  • @hurshpatel3575

    @hurshpatel3575

    3 жыл бұрын

    Question: Why are 3 cylinders for motorcycles than even 4 cylinders if they are unbalanced.

  • @OzzyCPT

    @OzzyCPT

    3 жыл бұрын

    I have had questions about this forever. Thanks for the easy to understand video. Please include a video for 1 to 4 rotor rotaries in the series

  • @abdulabdanahib9617

    @abdulabdanahib9617

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@hurshpatel3575 motor cycle engine use crossplane crankshaft

  • @millionairedieselgarage4767

    @millionairedieselgarage4767

    3 жыл бұрын

    You forgot the inline 8

  • @davidblalock9945
    @davidblalock99453 жыл бұрын

    It’s so refreshing to have someone explaining this so clearly and correctly. Too many people who tackle engineering subjects often resort to “dumbing it down” because they just don’t think people watching will have the intelligence to understand it.

  • @vulekv93

    @vulekv93

    3 жыл бұрын

    Or use generic and uninspired explanations which carry little meaning and insight. This guy hits hammer on it's head with his presentation.

  • @deusexaethera

    @deusexaethera

    3 жыл бұрын

    I think it has more to do with people who understand technical topics not knowing how to translate their understanding into non-technical terminology without losing a lot in the translation. Or to put it differently, engineers usually don't do words good.

  • @tombarber8013

    @tombarber8013

    3 жыл бұрын

    Too bad he's only partially correct.

  • @mihailmilev9909

    @mihailmilev9909

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@tombarber8013 wym?

  • @ian9toes

    @ian9toes

    Жыл бұрын

    @@mihailmilev9909 There is an error in this video. 17:06 you say when 2 are at the top, 2 are at the bottom. This doesn’t work. If one pair alternates with another pair that leaves the 3rd pair with no alternating partner. You can even see the error in where you paused the animation, 1 and 6 are not at TDC because this animation shows TDC when the conrod big end green bearing touches the line, which it isn’t where you paused it. Another problem with what you described is if the 2 are up and 2 are down the 2 pairs of conrods/cranks cancel each out. But the other 2 in the middle have the cranks out to one side and no counter force. What is actually happening in my opinion is that when 1 and 6 are at TDC, 2,3,4, and 5 are all at the same level with the cranks of 3 and 4 off to one side and cranks of 2 and 5 off to the other side, which balances left to right. And up and down forces are balanced out by 1 and 6 cranks being at TDC and the other 4 cranks all being 30 degrees below the midway point, with one pair on the way up and the other pair on the way down.

  • @owenbassist5049
    @owenbassist50493 жыл бұрын

    This guy explains better than my mechanics teacher

  • @trentdawg2832

    @trentdawg2832

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yea this dude is legit.. ....

  • @Flies2FLL

    @Flies2FLL

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@trentdawg2832 He is "legit"? He has NO idea how long a power stroke lasts. Hello?

  • @ACommenterOnYouTube

    @ACommenterOnYouTube

    3 жыл бұрын

    Some people were NOT meant to teach. Just because you THINK you know or actually KNOW your material does not mean you can teach it or relate to it ..

  • @ayoogbeide6637

    @ayoogbeide6637

    3 жыл бұрын

    All ya teacher cares about is paycheck

  • @ashleyabrahams4827

    @ashleyabrahams4827

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@Flies2FLL you obviously never paid attention.

  • @Scotracer1987
    @Scotracer19873 жыл бұрын

    Mate. I'm a Mechanical engineer designing powertrains and this was a great summary to get my head back in the game. Love it.

  • @TopiasSalakka
    @TopiasSalakka3 жыл бұрын

    Can't use an inline 6 in a transverse FWD application? Volvo: hold my beer

  • @fila1445

    @fila1445

    3 жыл бұрын

    i work at shop that specializes in Volvos turns out i hate working on Volvos...

  • @d4a

    @d4a

    3 жыл бұрын

    Must be fun changing a belt on a transverse inline 6 😅

  • @fila1445

    @fila1445

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@d4a its not that bad since timing chain is located over a gearbox. Changing alternator or ac compressor on the other hand...

  • @d4a

    @d4a

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@fila1445 I assumed they were chains, I meant the accessory or serpentine belts. I tried helping a friend with inline five in the Fiat Coupe do those belts once....we both scraped our knuckles off

  • @arekb5951

    @arekb5951

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@d4a According to wiki, Volvo calls this engine SI6 (short inline 6) and the engine itself is 1mm shorter than their previous inline 5. I'm really curious how they did it

  • @arthurabraham3271
    @arthurabraham32713 жыл бұрын

    This guy deserves a massive you tube following. Great work!

  • @logancudd7030

    @logancudd7030

    3 жыл бұрын

    i was unset he only talked about a flat plane inline 4 cylinder until the end of the video

  • @maneki9neko

    @maneki9neko

    3 жыл бұрын

    He is terrific isn't he?

  • @technologytechniciansllc3431

    @technologytechniciansllc3431

    2 жыл бұрын

    Totally agree, this is the best explanation and awesome instructor. I'm going to buy all his videos just to learn more....

  • @jasonhowell7763
    @jasonhowell77633 жыл бұрын

    I appreciate how you jumped right into the explanation, rather than leading in with an simple explanation of how engines work like a lot of channels do. Thanks. This is a really good video.

  • @deusexaethera

    @deusexaethera

    3 жыл бұрын

    I pity the fool who's watching a video about the balancing of engines with various numbers of cylinders if they don't already know how an engine works.

  • @CF_Sapper
    @CF_Sapper3 жыл бұрын

    Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.

  • @juancruzmarquez5502

    @juancruzmarquez5502

    3 жыл бұрын

    cringe marvel reference, go back to reddit

  • @valentinuiliqnow6198

    @valentinuiliqnow6198

    3 жыл бұрын

    what about vw vr6 engine ? ? ?

  • @psuls725

    @psuls725

    3 жыл бұрын

    ,,.

  • @juanordonezgalban2278

    @juanordonezgalban2278

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@valentinuiliqnow6198 as compared to the inline 6, i think you exchange packagin for a little inbalance (because now you have 3 pistons in two different planes). They also are limited in bore and the engine block stronght i think

  • @richardcaldwell6159

    @richardcaldwell6159

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@valentinuiliqnow6198 Good point. Another interesting configuration, one that I've never heard any examples of, is the 170 or so degree V. It would have almost as good balance as a Boxer but without forgoing gravity assist for the oil. The non-exact spacing of power strokes breaks up resonances while providing a bit of musicality to the engine's note. Or so I hypothesize. Maybe someone's tried it and the reality doesn't match my imagination.

  • @Lidekys
    @Lidekys3 жыл бұрын

    I always knew that 6 cylinders are very smooth, but now I know why. Great vid!

  • @charlesdjones1

    @charlesdjones1

    3 жыл бұрын

    It's amazing that car companies don't put more emphasis on the inline 6.. Such a simple design that is easy to work on at the same time. I would think with today's tech we could build an amazingly powerful I-6 that is also efficient.

  • @sujaykallamadi1515

    @sujaykallamadi1515

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@charlesdjones1 cue the B58 engine. It's truly an amazing engine when considering how efficient and how powerful the engine is. Quite an upgrade from older BMW I6 engines.

  • @oranges866

    @oranges866

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@charlesdjones1 jaguar, mercedes, and mazda came back to it.

  • @davosworks

    @davosworks

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@charlesdjones1 i want more Vr6 🤩

  • @soaringvulture

    @soaringvulture

    3 жыл бұрын

    That's why I love my 2JZ. Best inline 6 ever made.

  • @psnmadracer27
    @psnmadracer273 жыл бұрын

    "And that's because this video is actually the first in a little series..." Me: *audibly* YES! Speaking of series, when can we expect the next episode of boost school?

  • @d4a

    @d4a

    3 жыл бұрын

    Glad you like the series, thanks for watching :) Next episode of boost school is coming likely in the first week of January, it would have been sooner but I want to cram in the Yaris GR engine video in this Sunday, so boost school is getting delayed a bit.

  • @corbinyoung5320

    @corbinyoung5320

    3 жыл бұрын

    I'm excited for the V engines!

  • @bigjoetheelectrician
    @bigjoetheelectrician3 жыл бұрын

    Definitely want to see those can’t wait 👍🏻 18:50

  • @GSXRNissan

    @GSXRNissan

    3 жыл бұрын

    Straight 8 and Subaru flat 12 F1.

  • @camarocharger8180
    @camarocharger81803 жыл бұрын

    You are the modern day Engineering Explained, I remember watching his videos learning about engines in his dimly lit room with a white board back then, now you just explained it so perfectly. I just love watching every video you share, can't wait for more on this.

  • @lazaros23
    @lazaros233 жыл бұрын

    Please do yamahas crossplane, hearing so much about how smooth it is, how the rider feels so connected with the throttle and how it doesn't stress the tyres. Thank you!

  • @mydroidid

    @mydroidid

    3 жыл бұрын

    Every piston is forward 90° in relation to the one before it. it would have severe primary balance problem(solved with balance shaft)but the crank will not speed up or slow down during the tdc or bdc as the speeding up is acting against the slowing down of another piston .. it gets more detailed from here but this is the basic idea.. somthing like a 90° v twin sharing the same crank pin

  • @michaelallen2501
    @michaelallen25013 жыл бұрын

    2JZ the world. Seriously though. Ford 300 I6. Jeep 4.0L. RB series, JZ series, Barra, Cummins, BMW, Jaguar, blah blah blah. The I6 is pretty amazing. Whether you want reliability or 2500hp.

  • @Nit2315

    @Nit2315

    3 жыл бұрын

    True but it's hard to put in a compact car, it's not so good for the chassis weight/mass distribution, transmission, consumption, etc etc.

  • @944play

    @944play

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@Nit2315 e30 not compact enough?

  • @jackdarcy6294

    @jackdarcy6294

    3 жыл бұрын

    I love my M54, but "reliable" isn't in BMW's vocabulary.

  • @altblechasyl_cs2093

    @altblechasyl_cs2093

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@Nit2315 Do you know the 323ti or 325ti ? Let's talk about this item again after learning something about these cars. ;-)))

  • @fourseven6202

    @fourseven6202

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@Nit2315 my 323ti disagrees XD

  • @rushnerd
    @rushnerd2 жыл бұрын

    When I picked up my 88' Supra last week I wasn't super excited it "only" had a 6-cyn engine and it wasn't even a V-6. Now I absolutely adore the design and realized it's way better than what is on most cars. I didn't even realize before I picked the car up that all the cylinders were lined up in a row! Talk about a massive and perfectly balanced engine!

  • @desertrainfrog1691

    @desertrainfrog1691

    Жыл бұрын

    This is how so many people think. "If it's not a V8, it's gutless" - My friend when talking about a twin turbo V6 that makes 2x the power of their V8.

  • @trevorcalhoun4530
    @trevorcalhoun45303 жыл бұрын

    The straight eight is another well balanced engine and one I have always liked.

  • @88SC
    @88SC3 жыл бұрын

    This is a fun topic, and I learned some new things. The longitudinal rocking is new to me, but it reminds me of issues that aircraft engine manufacturers encountered in the late 1930s with double row radial engines. On a big radial, one cylinder has a (sort of) conventional connecting rod that is connected to the crank pin. The rest are connected to that with pins that are not concentric to the crank pin. So when the rod makes the pendulum motion that you described, the pistons, with their “link” rods tend to wrap slightly, causing them all to undergo different acceleration rates throughout the stroke of the main rod. The result is a small circular motion of the entire engine, where the cylinder centerlines remain on their static plane. If the engine has seven cylinders, the motion is nearly negligible, but with nine it’s a bit more severe. For single row engine, it’s not a problem, but if it’s a double row (eighteen cylinders), big problem! With that configuration, the two crank pins are 180° apart, like bicycle pedals. The circular motion, phased 180° apart, resulted in a wobbling motion of the whole engine, that attempted to constantly change the plane of rotation of the propeller. Watch out prop shaft and main bearings! The fix was to employ two sets of second order balances, rotating at twice crankshaft speed. This is what it took Pratt and Whitney and Wright to cross the 2,000 HP threshold, just in time for WWII Corsairs, Hellcats and others.

  • @GaurdianAzzar
    @GaurdianAzzar3 жыл бұрын

    A LOT of information in this video. I like the way you explained secondary imbalances. That is something I've struggled to wrap me head around for a long time. Looking forward to the rest in the series.

  • @Profect72
    @Profect723 жыл бұрын

    Oh and i was having a bad time understanding secondary balances this last week and then you show up, you've read my mind Thank you for sharing such amazing content

  • @Proefkonijntje

    @Proefkonijntje

    3 жыл бұрын

    Same for me! I was just thinking about posting a comment on this channel to ask for a video about engine balance. Not necessary, this guy reads our minds... My gratitude is eternal. :)

  • @ElCachorro97
    @ElCachorro973 жыл бұрын

    Even 6 cylinder diesel like the 1hd from 80 series, clutters and vibrate smoother than newer toyota 2.8 diesel on Fortuner or Hilux today.

  • @juanordonezgalban2278

    @juanordonezgalban2278

    3 жыл бұрын

    That's just phisics jajaja

  • @bakatzen6243

    @bakatzen6243

    3 жыл бұрын

    straight six is just that good

  • @guillaumegaudin694

    @guillaumegaudin694

    3 жыл бұрын

    Diesel engines are heavier, so of course the imbalance gets amplified

  • @3dule

    @3dule

    3 жыл бұрын

    those 2.8 are four cylinders I believe

  • @sparkie5571

    @sparkie5571

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@guillaumegaudin694 he’s comparing diesels in both scenarios.

  • @ThirtyOught6
    @ThirtyOught63 жыл бұрын

    Dang, I love this guy's videos! Clear, concise, to-the-point, no long-winded irrelevant info. I'm dying to hear you explain & evaluate Freddie Spencer's 1983 Honda NS-500 V3 TWO-stroke Gran Prix motorcycle race bike! And maybe also Bugatti's W-16.

  • @jozsefizsak
    @jozsefizsak3 жыл бұрын

    It's so great that you're doing this. While I always enjoyed the humour that you often added to your dissertations, I'm not complaining because I so appreciate your efforts that I'm content to have these in whatever style you most enjoy producing. Thank you so much!

  • @d4a

    @d4a

    3 жыл бұрын

    I definitely want to act stupid again, but somehow there's so many of these topics that I want to cover and I end up getting lost in trying to present them the best way that I can so I just forget about the humour 😔

  • @ENGINERESCUE86
    @ENGINERESCUE863 жыл бұрын

    I look forward to the rotary engine explanation since I'm sure you will cover it. I learned a lot today, thanks D4A

  • @jakubzidek

    @jakubzidek

    3 жыл бұрын

    IMMA TELL YOU ANYWAY

  • @technologytechniciansllc3431

    @technologytechniciansllc3431

    2 жыл бұрын

    That is what I wanted to see explained in inline to v explanation. Want to see even if completely useless for me, but addicted to this instruction...

  • @luidj9675
    @luidj96753 жыл бұрын

    I'm in a car engineering school but, every time I watch your video i learn something new!! Absolutely awesome!!

  • @frankdoubtfire4060
    @frankdoubtfire4060 Жыл бұрын

    Absolutely stunning presentation. This guy explains the different types of engine clearly, accurately and with a humour that is not stupid. Well done, looking forward to seeing more 👍👍👍

  • @epiploon79
    @epiploon793 жыл бұрын

    It’s a 6 cyl video! Perfectly balanced!

  • @EmpireStudioGaming
    @EmpireStudioGaming3 жыл бұрын

    I've always loved physics and 1 year ago i found my passion in cars and to find a channel like yours, that combines these passions is truly amazing. It's clear, easy to follow and your explanations are very clean. You have no idea how much i appreciate this kind of content. Thank you

  • @00gt5speed
    @00gt5speed3 жыл бұрын

    This is well-presented example on primary and secondary engine balance. The preface showing piston speed differences during crank shaft rotation was monumental in explaining discrepancies of the latter balance. Nicely done!

  • @JazzbLu
    @JazzbLu3 жыл бұрын

    I never knew that the piston speed is faster at the top than the bottom. I thank you again for sharing your knowledge! I love your videos!

  • @warp.routine
    @warp.routine3 жыл бұрын

    For all those opining the most well-known transverse 6 (Volvo), this is only possible because aisin managed to cram a 6-Speed auto Gearbox into a space narrower than the clearance for most manual units... Very impressive.

  • @thatclintguy

    @thatclintguy

    3 жыл бұрын

    Aisin is completely underrated. Toyota spinoff with global reach

  • @bennetteberle4476

    @bennetteberle4476

    2 жыл бұрын

    Is there any reason they couldn't put the transmission/transaxle in front of or behind the engine motorcycle style instead of on one end of the engine? A geared power takeoff from the center of the crank would make crankshaft torsional vibration less of an issue to boot.

  • @rosiehawtrey

    @rosiehawtrey

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@bennetteberle4476 They did that on aero engines to shorten the length - putting ancillary drives in the middle of the block - would be be very good for the I6 in FWD.

  • @bennetteberle4476

    @bennetteberle4476

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@rosiehawtrey Honda did that with the transverse I-6 in their CBX motorcycle. A chain drive from the middle of the crank to a jackshaft that drove the clutch. They introduced that bike in 1978 and discontinued it in 1982. It's now a sought-after collector's item.

  • @rolandsaucier1006
    @rolandsaucier10066 ай бұрын

    The first time I started up and drove my 97 Mercedes C280, I noticed the smoothness immediately. I always wondered about this. Thanks!

  • @cipher2508
    @cipher25083 жыл бұрын

    One of the most UNDERRATED channels I've ever seen I'm seriously looking forward to this balance series man Love your work BTW, if it isn't too much too ask, can you also cover different firing orders please? Thanx a lot D4A

  • @Mrgoodnyt
    @Mrgoodnyt3 жыл бұрын

    Excellent video mate very clear and easy to understand! looking forward to more. This channel is so underrated.

  • @santtilagmailcom
    @santtilagmailcom3 жыл бұрын

    Great video 👍👍👍 Can’t wait for the same stuff for V engines with different cylinder bank angles and different kind of crank angle applications.

  • @arconeagain

    @arconeagain

    3 жыл бұрын

    And V3s and V5s.

  • @ZachDxn
    @ZachDxn Жыл бұрын

    This explained exactly what I was looking for. It confirms my suspicion, inline 3 is awkward and inline 6 is the best engine configuration.

  • @stefanheale794
    @stefanheale7942 жыл бұрын

    Very concise and instructive presentation. It confirms why over 90% of the world's heavy trucks use a straight 6 configuration and why a straight 6 in a front engined rearwheel drive car gives the nicest driving experience. Personal opinion only. Just one little problem - at time 17:10, you stated that in the six, when two pistons are at the top, two are at the bottom. Clearly a 'slip of the tongue' but quite important as that scenario only occurs with a crank with 180 throws, not 120, which is what makes an in-line 4 so beastly.

  • @RayMorgenstern
    @RayMorgenstern3 жыл бұрын

    Every time someone sees my i3 Polo engine doing it's Macarena thing in the bay, it seems weird to them. I'll just reference this video from now on. Great video!

  • @keithw4920
    @keithw49203 жыл бұрын

    15 people have unbalanced engines.

  • @Boz1211111
    @Boz12111113 жыл бұрын

    wow your channel expanded so much since i was here. im glad to see how you grow by producing high quality content

  • @OldCrowsClassicCars
    @OldCrowsClassicCars3 жыл бұрын

    What a great video. Best and most complete explanation. We can only appreciate the time and effort you put in to go so far as to study the physics of the engine.

  • @chaselandry2962
    @chaselandry29623 жыл бұрын

    Motorcycle engines are fun. They still play around with crank angles, v4, and big bang firing order

  • @tomop5603
    @tomop56033 жыл бұрын

    This channel and mighty car mods are my all time youtube favourites!!!

  • @imShivamKumar
    @imShivamKumar Жыл бұрын

    Holy moly, this is the best video on this topic on whole of youtube, never stop making these videos you guys , this is amazing.

  • @xynostasos9022
    @xynostasos90223 жыл бұрын

    Looking to buy an Abarth Stilo 2.4L Inline-5 and this video explained what this "36 degree overlap" was all about. Thank you man!

  • @The_R-n-I_Guy
    @The_R-n-I_Guy3 жыл бұрын

    I didn't think I would like this video, but I learned a lot and I'm glad I watched it. Thanks for the info

  • @SPimentaTV
    @SPimentaTV3 жыл бұрын

    This is the best KZread channel about car mechanics theory!

  • @JohnDoe-zr6bk
    @JohnDoe-zr6bk3 жыл бұрын

    Perfect compacted knowledge without being boring or to demanding. Thumbs up!

  • @lookronjon
    @lookronjon3 жыл бұрын

    My brother had a Suzuki sprint in the Virgin Islands and had a three cylinder turbo and it actually screamed. My Toyota Land Cruiser has a straight six and it runs beautifully. Thanks for explaining this for us motorheads.

  • @rocketman2tm
    @rocketman2tm3 жыл бұрын

    If you are going to make a series on engine configurations, please include radial engines. Also thank you for making these videos, I appreciate the work you put into these.

  • @jackdarcy6294
    @jackdarcy62943 жыл бұрын

    can't wait for a vid on V configurations. curious to see if V8 dampens secondary imbalance in inline 4, and to hear how a V12 is just two inline 6s duct taped together.

  • @arkan7rb
    @arkan7rb2 жыл бұрын

    best videos ever for understanding mechanics thank you very much in all languages of the world greetings from Yemen

  • @1crazypj
    @1crazypj3 жыл бұрын

    That was the simplest and best explanation I have ever seen on con-rod angularity and piston speed. (and I've seen and read a lot over last ~50 years) It's something I've been aware of but probably too much math in previous explanations? Primary and secondary forces and balance shafts, about the same as I knew from 1970's but the first part was absolutely brilliant

  • @dakavanagh
    @dakavanagh3 жыл бұрын

    very informative. Looking forward to the crossplane discussion

  • @eyemastervideo
    @eyemastervideo3 жыл бұрын

    Well just wow, this is amazing. While I understood a little bit of this before, never have I seen a better display of primary and secondary imbalances, including the piston speeds effects. If not done already, can you do the same with V and W configuration engines? This is simply an amazing explanation. Thank you!

  • @micsub
    @micsub3 жыл бұрын

    D4A... Nothing to add but a big thank you for all your videos. You make it look all so simple...

  • @bicyclist2
    @bicyclist23 жыл бұрын

    The in line 6 was used in the early Jag E-Types. The in line 5 was used in the Volvo 7 and 8 series sedans and estates as well as VW Golf GTi's. The Lotus Esprit used a in line four for decades. You don't see very many in line 3's in the US. This was very educational. I wish I'd learned about this when I was in school. Thank you.

  • @SvcGlobal
    @SvcGlobal3 жыл бұрын

    This is one of the best videos I ever saw in this channel, thanks!

  • @lillyalriachy3357
    @lillyalriachy33573 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for the extremely informative videos.

  • @pAirA_
    @pAirA_3 жыл бұрын

    Absolutely amazing video. No BS, and superb teaching methods. Kudos mate 👍

  • @MasterDawZ
    @MasterDawZ3 жыл бұрын

    Outstanding video. Very clear, detailed, but not too complicated. My first video of yours, and I'm an instant subscriber. Keep this kind of content going!

  • @gaspuppygarage3782
    @gaspuppygarage37823 жыл бұрын

    I'm looking forward to this series. Would be sweet to see you explain an inline 8 though. I know its uncommon but legend has it they were so smooth you could put a coin sideways on it and it wouldn't fall over!

  • @casemodder89

    @casemodder89

    3 жыл бұрын

    Thats for I6. After I6 it cant get much better. Everything else is just 2 times I3 vor a V6 or 2x I4 for V8, 2x I6 for a V12 and so on. More cyclinders result in more low end ooomph, but primary and secondarys still stay about the same. In V configs the engine also rocks a bit sideways around the crankshaft. B4 and B6 are about perfekt, because piston/conrod masses cancel each other out over the mirrored design.

  • @JViello

    @JViello

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@casemodder89 Wellll....Kind of. There are two V8 engines. Cross plane, and flat plane. Cross planes are much smoother IMO and have no I4 counterpart aside from Yamaha's R1. Something similar is also possible in the V6 world, but aside from the Alfa Romeo's BEAST of a V6, I don't know of any other "oddball" V6 engines that don't mimic an I3. I think maybe the early Buick 3.8 V6 did so but then they switched to offset crank pins.

  • @dennisseuferling815
    @dennisseuferling8153 жыл бұрын

    "You just cant hate a perfectly balanced engine" Someone forgot to tell Jeep that. I wish they kept the 4.0L even if was a non-standard option.

  • @junkdubious

    @junkdubious

    3 жыл бұрын

    AMC did Chrysler doesn't care.

  • @andrewjackson9853

    @andrewjackson9853

    3 жыл бұрын

    I put a 5 cylinder Mercedes in my CJ...

  • @mpetersen6

    @mpetersen6

    2 жыл бұрын

    When the Wrangler got redsigned around 2006 the 4.0 didnt fit anything. Plus the engine needed a major redesign, new head etc.

  • @fernandoanatomia
    @fernandoanatomia3 жыл бұрын

    The complete guide I've been looking for. Thank you for sharing knowledge! Congrats from Brazil!

  • @undeadmonkey9122
    @undeadmonkey91223 жыл бұрын

    I fully enjoy my I5 3.7L Colorado. So much fun to drive. Is a little rough at startup till it warms up a bit. The overlap explains a lot on some of its “personality” when driving. Thank you for that.

  • @elitedavidhorne8494
    @elitedavidhorne84943 жыл бұрын

    Looking forward to you covering engine balance in V6 engines. My place of work has just started to to produce V6 engines after building nothing but V8s. The V6 engines have a balance shaft fitted.

  • @juanordonezgalban2278

    @juanordonezgalban2278

    3 жыл бұрын

    I can't wait for him to trash talk on 90° V6s

  • @eTiMaGo
    @eTiMaGo3 жыл бұрын

    Talking about inline 3's, would you do a feature on the GR Yaris' engine? Seems like quite a firecracker!

  • @d4a

    @d4a

    3 жыл бұрын

    Everybody's in love with that thing, myself included. Actually a video on it is a pretty good idea. I haven't dug yet but I don't know how much info is released when it comes to the engine. I need to go beyond the basics and hp and torque figures. Imma go look now, I just got super curious. Update: Vid is happening! Thank you for the idea.

  • @daurysd8402

    @daurysd8402

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@d4a cam you splain how vacuum work like in the intake manifold vacuum lines

  • @shafferjoe1962
    @shafferjoe19623 жыл бұрын

    Thank you sir. I love how you broke this down to a nice simple explanation of each engine combo. Can't wait for the others video's to drop. Keep up the good work brother...

  • @olavcramer4814
    @olavcramer48143 жыл бұрын

    The best way to explain engine primary and secondary nuances yet. Thanks so much for making these! Now I'm really looking forward to the next Mazda straight 6. Let's hope it's not just DI and also throws in some occasional intake valve cleaning Port Injection for a truly remarkable engine.

  • @domantas8185
    @domantas81853 жыл бұрын

    This mans really do be teaching me theoretical engineering degree knowledge doe.

  • @4BillC
    @4BillC3 жыл бұрын

    I was definitely curious about the cross plane I4. I do however have an I5. It is a really smooth engine!

  • @4BillC

    @4BillC

    3 жыл бұрын

    @Yuck Foutube it is, and I honestly really do like a 5 cylinder engine. Unfortunately mine is in a 4700lb truck, according to the local scrap yard scale, and with a stock 220hp and about that much torque... She's a little on the slow side.

  • @bobsponge6609
    @bobsponge66093 жыл бұрын

    There is only one 6 cylinder mounted transverse engine that I know of and it was used in the Suzuki Verona or Daewoo Magnus etc.. It was a very smooth engine but are not very common anymore, most of them are in the scrap yard ... it was not very reliable engine. Cracked cylinder walls issues if I remember correctly. Thank you for doing these great videos, I learn so much with them.

  • @mikeprzyrembel6308

    @mikeprzyrembel6308

    3 жыл бұрын

    Austin/Wolseley 2.2l, had a company car with one many years ago.

  • @flurka
    @flurka Жыл бұрын

    I've just discovered this channel and I'm hooked. He explains it very well. 👌

  • @danronck3636
    @danronck36363 жыл бұрын

    I just LOOOOVEEE those freaking I6 engines, just soo beautiful🥲🥰🥰🥰

  • @ViperDent
    @ViperDent3 жыл бұрын

    It'll be fantastic if you cover some odd/uncommon piston engines like Radials, VR, W, X, U, H, Delta, Opposed, Inline 7, V3, etc. It'll take a while but should make a great series with clear episode goals. :)

  • @DinhDover
    @DinhDover3 жыл бұрын

    You taught me something NEW! Love your videos and lectures.

  • @jimpie231
    @jimpie2313 жыл бұрын

    Now I understand how the Geo 3 & 4 cylinder engines worked in the early 90’s. Thanks......Jim

  • @attesaawdlife8115
    @attesaawdlife81153 жыл бұрын

    Six in a row is the way to go :)

  • @taylorkingrealestate2053
    @taylorkingrealestate20533 жыл бұрын

    I really appreciate these videos. Wanna see a fascinating engine? Check out the V4 in the VFR1200. I owned one, it was awesome. The phasing and balance was a marvel of engineering.

  • @lctortillas
    @lctortillas3 жыл бұрын

    I learned more in this 19 min & 29 sec video about engine balancing than all the mechanics combine I've ever talked to. WOW !!

  • @hasmax786
    @hasmax7863 жыл бұрын

    Now I know why people love BMW engines because they have smooth power delivery from all 6 pistons which are balanced and timed in a way to make sure the car doesn't lose performance. Engineering explained goes way over my head but this guy is an amazing teacher.

  • @richardjessop6029
    @richardjessop60293 жыл бұрын

    This guy got me proud of owning an inline six

  • @haninditohaidarsatrio7393
    @haninditohaidarsatrio73933 жыл бұрын

    I can't wait for another thorough 'educational' videos about engines like this I really love this kind of content Thank you for providing such a great video, sir I really want to see V6 vs VR6 😆

  • @aslgv8
    @aslgv83 жыл бұрын

    By far and large and without any fear of being unfair to others this is the very best explanation on the subject of engine balancing. The secondary inbalance is very well detailed. Thank you very much for taking your knowledgement and time to produce this so great video as well as the other related ones. Would like to add that there is a very good old book named V6 performance written by Pat Ganahl that covers very deeply all 90' degrees usa made V6 engines and very detailed about the semi even firing engines that were offered for some time.

  • @mikes9939
    @mikes99393 жыл бұрын

    Excellent video in all regards. The best I have seen in discussing and explaining this confusing subject. Very well done.

  • @Kowen8714
    @Kowen87143 жыл бұрын

    One of the things I loved when owning BMWs was the i6 engine. So smooth that I'd often check if the car is running at idle. Now the i4 engines with their turbos are more efficient and more powerful, but the amount of noise (direct injection and vibrations) is really bad... Oh, and the old Audi 2.2/2.3l 10V engines made a great noise.

  • @alexk3469

    @alexk3469

    2 жыл бұрын

    Yeah but there m cars don’t have 4 cylinders faster so it just mean the six cylinders are fast

  • @rampentpanda
    @rampentpanda3 жыл бұрын

    nice video, looking forward to motorcycle engines!

  • @excellencyism
    @excellencyism Жыл бұрын

    Love your videos and am watching them all. I find the playlists out of order though. Would be awesome if they were numbered for best continuity! Keep pumping them out!

  • @yondidier9576
    @yondidier95762 жыл бұрын

    This channel is awesome, thanks for existing.

  • @Barnabe51Reims
    @Barnabe51Reims3 жыл бұрын

    Very interesting, I love my 5 cyl even more :)

  • @fortitudevalance8424
    @fortitudevalance84243 жыл бұрын

    I got a Skoda Fabia with the 1.4TDi engine, it’s a 3 cyl engine and always wondered if the balancing shaft would get damaged or warp over time.

  • @d4a

    @d4a

    3 жыл бұрын

    No reason for it to get damaged under normal operating conditions. Enjoy your engine 😊 I drove a rental car with that engine for a week, I couldn't believe how low the fuel consumption was.

  • @michaelfleck5288
    @michaelfleck52883 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic instruction. You are giving us all a clinic on automotive physics!

  • @fredericrike5974
    @fredericrike59743 жыл бұрын

    Awesome- clear, concise- much info conveyed. Can't wait to see the rest of it.

  • @GoldenGrenadier
    @GoldenGrenadier3 жыл бұрын

    I'd love to see a breakdown such as this on inline 7 and 8 engines. The only inline 7 I know of is in some combine harvester I think.

  • @darylmorse

    @darylmorse

    3 жыл бұрын

    There are inline 7 cylinder marine engines, as well as more cylinders.

  • @ericspecullaas2841

    @ericspecullaas2841

    3 жыл бұрын

    Pre 1950 they had inline 8's hell they even had v12 and v16 cars. They never made much power but provided really smooth operation and were easy to shift.

  • @robsycko
    @robsycko3 жыл бұрын

    Don't leave out opposed piston.

  • @SuperMoey1
    @SuperMoey12 жыл бұрын

    Very happy I found this channel, great vids!

  • @marianlech3378
    @marianlech33783 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much for explaining the firing interval in degrees. I missed it so much, asked many people, no one could tell. Thank you!!!!!!!

  • @uhyeahitsme413
    @uhyeahitsme4133 жыл бұрын

    I love my inline 6's

  • @TwoLotus2

    @TwoLotus2

    3 жыл бұрын

    And they can sound nice too.

  • @snap_oversteer
    @snap_oversteer3 жыл бұрын

    No mention of 'your' inline 7 3JZ? :D

  • @user-vs7sb9wg2r

    @user-vs7sb9wg2r

    3 жыл бұрын

    Same as the inline five, but with even less relevant primary imbalance, I suppose. I actually hope I hear a automobile inline 7 before i die, because they would sound awesome.

  • @ENGINERESCUE86

    @ENGINERESCUE86

    3 жыл бұрын

    The original photoshopped 3jz was an inline 8. However, I have read that Toyota will unveil the 3jz engine as a twin turbo 4.0L v8

  • @philljustphill1656

    @philljustphill1656

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@ENGINERESCUE86 wtf? that's awesom

  • @ENGINERESCUE86

    @ENGINERESCUE86

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@philljustphill1656 yeah go do a Google image search for 3jz, and there were also a few articles about a v8 3jz.

  • @bakatzen6243

    @bakatzen6243

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@ENGINERESCUE86 why dont toyota put that engine under UZ family?

  • @JRSC54
    @JRSC543 жыл бұрын

    I’ve been taking them apart for over 35 years. Nicely explained 🤠

  • @atlasintegrations4114
    @atlasintegrations41143 жыл бұрын

    Excellent video, very informative and educational. Love the math, which gives me something to think about. I did remove the balance shaft from my Procharger 4.3L V6 to drop the spinning mass. My understanding is that the engine was balanced internally when I went to forged internals and four bolt mains, as well with the flex plate and harmonic balancer considered. Would love for you to cover this in the V series engines because the Vortec 4.3L V6 has an even fire offset dual rod journal configuration. Many guys have built Odd Fire motors where supposedly the standard dual V engine rod journal is implemented. Interesting stuff. Thanks for what you do.

Келесі