DVD 2016: Lockheed Martin Patria AMV and the Warrior Turret

Ғылым және технология

Christopher F Foss, Editor, IHS Jane's Land Warfare Platforms talks about the Lockheed Martin's Patria AMV and the Warrior Turret

Пікірлер: 23

  • @normoloid
    @normoloid7 жыл бұрын

    Nice

  • @tHeWasTeDYouTh
    @tHeWasTeDYouTh2 жыл бұрын

    this looks so nice, no one bought it I presume and the new warrior turret and upgrade was cancelled

  • @homopetteri7766
    @homopetteri77666 жыл бұрын

    Arma3 marshall anyone ? Btw the amv is my favourite APC

  • @agustadanny2251
    @agustadanny2251 Жыл бұрын

    Itu gimana ambil gambarnya yaa

  • @auristifenzenas4993
    @auristifenzenas49933 жыл бұрын

    What price this armored vehicle?

  • @duhni4551

    @duhni4551

    3 жыл бұрын

    Around 2000 000 EUR, depending on configuration it can be lot more expensive or bit cheaper.

  • @PrivateSusi

    @PrivateSusi

    Жыл бұрын

    @@duhni4551 Slovaks bought 76 x Patria AMV XP 8x8 with 447 million USD so 5.9 million USD with their configuration.

  • @duhni4551

    @duhni4551

    Жыл бұрын

    @@PrivateSusi Slovaks also paid for transferred technology and rights to produce the vehicles them selves.

  • @fatherlandchild2780
    @fatherlandchild27807 жыл бұрын

    Didnt mention Finland, wich made the worlds best APC. Youre only taking all the honor for the Lockheed Martin etc. "American"... 👿

  • @KossolaxtheForesworn

    @KossolaxtheForesworn

    6 жыл бұрын

    finland does make the best APC's.

  • @doncampbell9444

    @doncampbell9444

    6 жыл бұрын

    @Fatherland Child ...grow up .

  • @harri9885

    @harri9885

    6 жыл бұрын

    Imho it's great that Lockheed Martin finally buffs the AMV. :)

  • @randoko9342

    @randoko9342

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@kristijansusnik1297 Patria amv has also been combat proven and did an amazing job and just cause you yell harder about something does not mean its better... i mean sure boxer is a great apc that is modular as hell but is it better than amv i think not.

  • @josephelias9081
    @josephelias90817 жыл бұрын

    The Ajax is terrible. It's *HUGE, SLOW and HEAVY*. It doesn't have enough armour to make up for this *AND* It's *EXPENSIVE*

  • @z7ealot282

    @z7ealot282

    7 жыл бұрын

    How would you know that, Are you a psychic?

  • @josephelias9081

    @josephelias9081

    7 жыл бұрын

    A Small Acorn No, I'm just not a *Special* kind of idiot / wannabe troll. Its called research.

  • @z7ealot282

    @z7ealot282

    7 жыл бұрын

    Joseph Elias Well you clearly are a special kind of idiot. Research..? Hmmm... well I don't know what you have been reading but the AJAX is by no means huge and slow. Its a heavy weight because it uses a lot of Armour, I don't know why you are saying "it doesn't have enough Armour". The only thing you got right was calling it expensive, unfortunately great things don't come cheaply

  • @josephelias9081

    @josephelias9081

    7 жыл бұрын

    A Small Acorn Couple of points 1, Your spelling is terrible 2, Its too heavy to be air-mobile yet not well armored enough to be an effective frontline vehicle. 3, It doesn't fit it's combat role as primarily an infantry support vehicle....It's basically the same thing as the Bradley AFV which is terrible. 4, I suggest you go away and do the research for yourself instead of relying on company promotion videos.

  • @josephelias9081

    @josephelias9081

    7 жыл бұрын

    A Small Acorn You've still not researched the vehicle. Good job wasting your time.

Келесі