Evolution isn't something you "Believe" in. Either you understand it, or you don't.

@qhudz_

8 жыл бұрын

hypothesis

@clintr9515

8 жыл бұрын

Yeah. Like humanity being around for millions of years. Why can't we eat grass? Why can't we eat bark? Life-forms adapt to their evironments, right? Why can't we breathe water? Why can't we eat dirt? This evolution stuff is so stupid. Think for yourself instead of letting others tell you what to believe. You're smarter than that!

@ExtantFrodo2

8 жыл бұрын

+Clint R Evolution isn't intelligent. It has no way of knowing any of those things would be better capabilities for us if we had them. It's only 2 mechanisms are variations from the parent stock and culling of those variations that can't reproduce. As environments change over time, so too does what gets culled. This manifests as change to species over time.

@ExtantFrodo2

8 жыл бұрын

***** It's just terrible that so many see that evidence and simply say "I don't understand it, but God must have had a very good reason for doing it that way.". In this fashion, it's a game of "Heads I win, Tails you lose" in which no amount of evidence for evolution would dislodge their conviction that evolution could never happen. Truth be told they simply don't want evolution to be valid. They think it makes them "not special", unimportant, no better than any animal. As if that were not enough, they think it would also mean there's no reason to live a moral life, that morality could not exist. It's all so whacked when you try to take it all in, but sometimes you have to to see how fruitless it would be to try to convince them.

@lordgarion514

8 жыл бұрын

+ExtantFrodo2 if they want to believe that a god got the ball rolling, let them think it. as long as they also understand and accept the scientific process and what it repeatedly tells us, its all good tbh. hell, a god snapping his heels together like dorthy and saying "make it so" like picard isnt any more unprovable a hypothesis about how the universe got started than the big bang is. just be glad those that believe in a god but also believe in real science arent completely stupid like those that believe the earth is 6,000 years old.

Scroll back up and watch the video; no intelligent discussion can be found in this comment section

@RabiesVariant01

8 жыл бұрын

+S Winegar I'm trying to avoid commenting, because I don't want to bother with the headaches.

@danielirvin4420

8 жыл бұрын

+S Winegar Should have listened to you...

@matthewgodfrey9470

7 жыл бұрын

Watch out for the top comment thread....

@iithewaterhashira

6 жыл бұрын

Thanks

@timmy18135

4 жыл бұрын

🦄🦄🦄🦄intelligent design could be anything from the mathematician worlds to the Shining

Well, once again we've had to republish our video "Does the Theory of Evolution Really Matter?". This time we realized we had some info wrong about our sponsors. It seems that Stated Clearly is suffering from an embarrassing case of "premature publication". Next time we get ready to publish a video, we'll make sure not to launch until all participating parties are fully satisfied :) kzread.info/dash/bejne/mqWZ0rOAf7yxipM.html

@nicemaho

9 жыл бұрын

Can I translate the video to arabic and post it on my page ?

@wasbedeutet151

9 жыл бұрын

Mohmd Blue Wow! I actually just wanted to say the same thing. I think we should cooperate in doing so!

9 жыл бұрын

Mohmd Blue go ahead man, I'm sure they would feel great to know that their video is being translated into diferent languages, just put them in the credits and you as well, here in Brazil there are a few videos of them in portuguese too.

@bugzpudding

9 жыл бұрын

Oh you must be completely mortified! I hope you aren't averse to the idea of making mostakes, though. Making mistakes means your learning! :D

@bugzpudding

9 жыл бұрын

bugzpudding like my mistake of misspelling mistake...

Love how the human gets fatter as the fish get smaller.

@map2001luvskitties

8 жыл бұрын

I noticed that too haha

@misterperez459

8 жыл бұрын

Lol.I was wondering when he was going to mention why.

@edwardyang8254

7 жыл бұрын

The appearance of people becoming fat has nothing to do with evolution, since it occurred in only 1 or 2 generations. If we look back a few hundred generations, and compare with early humans, modern humans are actually taller and slimmer.

@alphaomegaprime3923

6 жыл бұрын

but I hate how brains get smaller but fish jokes are getting better(which is why Donald Trump laughed at that old joke)

@user-io2ff3vs1p

6 жыл бұрын

It's the same guy growing older.

I have always been stuck with the notion that Evolution would only be an argumentative point, rather than a practical theory. I only wonder why I didn’t realize it before, being that it is a theory of change? Perhaps because Evolution seems synonymous to “slow” change, that we wouldn’t have suspect it for even immediate changes within years or even months. This makes me happier knowing that something like this can be useful for helping populations. Thank you for this video!

6:09 "Why are grasslands turning into deserts?" It's because Mufasa died and Scar took over!

@godassasin8097

7 ай бұрын

nah it's cuz Harambe died

The Creationists in this comment section and their delusional misrepresentation of evolution and flawed arguments against it just prove that religion is incompatible with a modern society.

@jimmys6566

3 жыл бұрын

The type of person like you, who blindly supports evolution seems to be unaware that in Sir Fred Hoyle's 1989 book "Mathematics of Evolution" he explains why Darwinian theory is wrong, and that his motive in rejecting Darwinism is not religious (he was as atheist); rather he concludes that Darwinism is an impediment to discovering a better theory of our origins. He rejects the core Darwinian theory of (goo to you by way of the zoo), being driven by favourable mutations from simple organic molecules to complex life.

@NoMementoMori

3 жыл бұрын

@@jimmys6566 i dont "blindly" support evolution, i did the necessary research to convince myself that this is a valid (and the only valid) explanation for the diversity we see in life on earth. Just like i will research what your argument of authority has to say on this. But hey at least you got to spam a book name into the comment section to feel smart, instead of actually just listing "Sir Fred Hoyle's" arguments so i could adress them. No different from just linking a YT vid and then pretending you made your case, because you know usually nobody would watch an hour long YT vid or read an entire book just to adress you. From his wikipeadia article he seems like he loved to publish theories just to oppose correct ones. For example he also didnt believe in the Big Bang theory, claiming the Steady-State-Theory of the universe would be correct, yet it would be expanding through the *constant creation of matter* , of course violating the laws of thermodynamics, which he appearently didnt want to acknowledge. Until 1993 he held that believe, despite everyone else already accepting the Big Bang. He was more of an edgy teenager than anything else, opposing just for the sake of opposition. However, as far as i can see from his wiki article, he doesnt seem to reject "the core Darwinian theory". He rejects if anything our current understanding of Abiogenisis, how life started. He beliefs that life formed in space and then came on earth from comets. I didnt found anything suggesting he had an alternative belief on how life evolves after that aka. how diversity in life formed, which is what the core of evolution is. Most of his criticism seems to be on how unlikely it is that life came from matter randomly, which is NOT evolution, thats abiogenisis. Only in his books summary i could find "arguments against evolution", no different than modern day silly creationist arguments. First he says that that "advantageous" mutations are swamped by deterious mutations, however he then quickly admits that through natural selection thats still enough to hold the deterious ones in check. Essentially claiming that kinds magically dont change through deterious ones, but also dont change through advantageous ones, holding them just exactly in a magic equlibrium. The terms deterious and advantageous already being unscientific since non of them are really either, they are both mutations changing the organism, which is what evolution requires. However, as far as he is a mathematician he is certainly no biologist, his entire chapter on how he reached that conclusion includes equations but the necessary data to fit or conclude these he just "deduces" with no scientific source whatsoever. Most of his results are pure speculation, not based on any biological facts or observations as far as i can see in his book. He claims life couldnt adept outside of very narrow limits, which of course is paradoxical since evolution in minor can change almost anything about an animal, morphology, anatomy, genes, which if the "base animal" always changes further and further automatically guarantees large changes unless you specifiy what even minor evolution couldnt affect. Which of course he doesnt, he just cites someone else who appearently "proofed that for him". Sure. Science. Then he says the fossil record should show "transitions", which is obviously stupid to say since any species is in constant change so this is flawed to begin with. Any transition would also be a new species itself, and we have found many who serve as a link between 2 species. Also, just practically we can already show that over multiple generations significant changes happen, not leading to detereation of these animals. Because deteriation of genes doesnt mean deteriation of entire kinds, since the negative get sorted out in the species but the positive ones actually change the species since they get preserved since they are not sorted out. And if you think i just cant grasp his book, how about YOU actually make your argument how he deduced mathematically that evolution is wrong? Surely you read the book? However, since he doesnt have any education on biology or paleontology, he is no different than any other uneducated layman on these topics, so i dont get how you think he is an authority on these topics to begin with. His equations are completly meaningless since they are based on pure speculation and not fit with any data from observation to begin with. And his alternative of evolution, if appearently nothing ever goes beyond a state of its own kind? Nonexistent, since hes not even religious it appears he, again, just wanted to say something controversial.

@grasianofau8771

3 жыл бұрын

@@jimmys6566 Fred Hoyle started with weak probable postulates when he evaluate evolution concept such that he reached plainly wrong innacurate conclusions about it.

@jimmys6566

3 жыл бұрын

@@grasianofau8771 Not at all my friend: Hoyle was mainstream and the mainstream was completely wrong until about 1960; when the views of Martin Ryle [ (1918 - 1984) who was an English radio astronomer and engineer who developed revolutionary radio telescope systems (see e.g. aperture synthesis) and used them for accurate location and imaging of weak radio sources] confirmed that Cosmic Egg model of Georges Édouard Lemaître was correct. (Lemaître was the Belgian Catholic priest, mathematician, astronomer, and professor of physics at the Catholic University of Louvain).

@Programm4r

3 жыл бұрын

Give hydrogen enough time and it'll begin to question its existence.

COME ON MAAAN, YOU JUST TOOK A PISS THERE, DONT EAT THAT!

@latrellfrasier

9 жыл бұрын

Celticsfan969 Made my day!

@rodrigov7114

7 жыл бұрын

Celticsfan969 I was expecting him to eat his shit lol

I love how people say this not evolution... A desperate attempt to preserve their straw-men..

@ReiperX

9 жыл бұрын

fndalves A lot of it comes from the strawman version of evolution that is built by them by ICR.

@fndalves

4 жыл бұрын

J. Buxter-Fleener evolution is just the fact that life forms slowly change from generation to generation... that’s all... it is a fundamental property of life.. you are the one talking about god... that’s your problem...

@user-jo5rv9jf7b

3 жыл бұрын

@J. Buxter-Fleener hey so umm. I'm recently studying evolution and just got myself into this evolution debate (many of the arguments and evidence i've read about are pro-evolution and they are reasonable) so could you tell me exactly which scientific laws does The theory of Evolution contradict? I'm just asking since i believe everyone should have evidence for their opinions in a serious debate

The Theory of Evolution is one of the greatest discoveries in the history of humankind

@agentindiana3415

6 жыл бұрын

Nope. That was Porn.

@franzjosephliszt1555

6 жыл бұрын

I agree with you Dylan, but I just gotta give it to Indiana

@mikeo759

5 жыл бұрын

Evolution is not a theory, it's an observation. We see change in the fossil records of species and try to explain it. Evolution by Natural Selection is a theory to explain the mechanism that drives the changing of species. There are non-Darwinian methods for evolution, as well. Like selective breeding in domesticated animals.

@sidneyjohnson6882

5 жыл бұрын

Dylan Whisnant and one of the simplest

@skipbellon4342

5 жыл бұрын

It's also the most obvious. It only takes observation and logic. No measurement needed. If it weren't for organizations with their own agendas it would have been common knowledge centuries earlier.

Been reading some of the comments. Why is it that the people that know the least about a subject have the most to say about it. It's like stupid and loud are directly proportional to each-other . This video and all the videos on this channel are brilliant and simple at the same time. If you watch this video and all of the others and you STILL don't understand, then there is just no hope for you. And to all that people making comments like, "yeah but if evolution is true then why are there still monkeys? durp durp" or any of those, "how come this?" or "why that?" type comments. Here's some advice.. GOOGLE IT!!!!! Read a fucking book! EDUCATE yourself! Don't just sit there asking what you will come to realize are very stupid questions.

@solidaritytime3650

9 жыл бұрын

Reggie Lawrence yeah, there was a study done on that topic in which two groups of people: 1 who didn't know much about a certain subject, and 2 who were experts in the field (i don't remember what the subject was was as it's been a long time since i read the study) were asked how much they thought they knew about said subject. The result was that the ignorant people were the most confident in their knowledge on the subject- crazy, no?

@FrogFace64

7 жыл бұрын

So, out of interest, how confident are you both in your knowledge of evolution? :)

@MateusSFigueiredo

6 жыл бұрын

It's called the Dunning-Kruger effect

@phxcppdvlazi

5 жыл бұрын

@@FrogFace64 :)) ((::: :) :) :) :) ((: (: (: (:

@PhilVanDerPolz

4 жыл бұрын

There might be lazy people out there, but there are NO STUPID QUESTIONs. How arrogant can someone be to say that ! And those that ready the most think often they are the brightest/most intelligent ones. No, those who think for themself are , because if all people would never question anything the earth would be still the center of the universe. There is one thing that did not change since the very beginning of human kind - arrogance. Congrats to that.

Also evolution programming is a really cool thing. It has nothing to do with biology, but it still uses the basic principles of evolution. It works by generating a set of random solutions to a very complex problem. Then doing what evolution does (breeding, mutating ,killing off the bad ones) and you get some very good results.

And this is why I love science. Excellent watch, thank you!

@TheAtheistChef

10 жыл бұрын

You don't love science you just like staring at it as it walks by. :D

@XYZ-xl5fs

9 жыл бұрын

TheAtheistChef 'Are you staring at my ass?' 'Don't mind me, just peer reviewing' ;)

@Boris99999

3 жыл бұрын

@@XYZ-xl5fs This topic sure makes me wanna dive deep into this studying material!

@amongussus4

3 жыл бұрын

Monke mattah

@xletix69

2 жыл бұрын

@@XYZ-xl5fs lmaooo

Great examples! Although as a picky evolutionary scientist I would regret the use of the phrase "genetic code", in place of genetic sequence, and the use of "missing link". Also I would have been interested in examples about the speciation process for example, because many people don't have problems with small intra-population changes, but macro-evolutionary changes are more difficult to grasp concretely, or we might wonder why that matters... You quickly said "despite being interesting", but I'd like to extend the topic beyond really concrete applications; I think that the simple knowledge of the theory of evolution does not only bring purely intellectual satisfaction, but helps putting our (human) existence into perspective: knowing by what enormous chance we came to be, how extraordinarily diversified biodiversity is, how we can't be considered the "final goal" of evolution but only a ridiculous tip in the enormous bush of life, etc, if most people realized that, it might really have practical consequences on how our society behaves (let's talk about resource plundering, pollution, etc...).

Really happy I found your channel. Top quality content!

8:34 he ate the pee, eww

@rodrigov7114

7 жыл бұрын

TheFloatingSheep I was expecting him to eat his shit lol

@stefan1024

5 жыл бұрын

Guess it was a big laugh animating that scene :D

@herelous2911

3 жыл бұрын

@@rodrigov7114 lol same here

Excellent. Informative, concise, and we'll structured.

@Geelar

6 жыл бұрын

Yup one could say it was... Stated Clearly

@aebhosor4835

2 жыл бұрын

@@Geelar "Ba dum tss"

I've been working on ways to share Evolution with my Creationist family and your videos are a wonderful resource. Please keep creating! You've got my support on Patron.

And many stupid people don't believe evolution at all

@TheBeatSmash

7 жыл бұрын

jholotan best have you ever researched evolution for yourself? Or do just you trust the masonic school system that indoctrinated you into the theory of evolution and globe theory and heliocentrism

@Jonathan-ng9ic

7 жыл бұрын

I studied evolution for a long time for myself, but evolution (from one kind to a new kind (which requires new genes) is never scientifically proven. In fact, most scientific findings are pointing to something very different. For me this was kind of shocking to discover, but it is the truth. The theory of Evolution and the Big Bang theory, which mostly are presented together, are theories which are based on scientific ASSUMPTIONS which, by the same science, are proven and general know to be IMPOSSIBLE. Please don't ignore the facts, open up your mind and at least don't insult people because they don't want to believe a theory which assumptions are in-scientific and against all (moral) senses. - Information (DNA) can never come from not-information. - Chaos (Big Bang) never brings order (The first cell, which is more complex and organised than a factory) ( & Our solar system) - Life requires organisation, organisation in turn requires intelligence - A mechanism (an evolved species, like a bat) can only function and survive when ALL the required components are present and work together. For example, think about it, what was first, the chicken of the egg? If the chicken evolved first, it then lay an egg. Was the egg fertilized? If the egg was first, was the egg fertilized? And when the chicken 'thing' evolved, what did evolve first? 1. The blood 2. The blood vessels 3. The heart 1. Why did it evolve blood, when it had no blood vessels and no heart? 2. Why did it evolve blood vessels, when it had no blood and no heart? 3. Why did it evolve the heart, when it had no blood and no blood vessels? It doesn't make sense, do you see? All thins had to be set in motion right on the same moment, otherwise the mechanism/organism could not survive. And at last, it is not said that the Theory of Evolution matters because some (small) parts of it can be used by some experiments which can give a fine solution for some problems. For example, how does the hypothesis that grass is dependent on (other) organisms is a argument for the fact that the Theory of Evolution matter. Let me explain, how could it not be that God created all the organisms in such a way, that we're all dependent to each other. You can see this in all sorts of life, even in marriage. For example, if we could reproduce ourselves without intimacy with an other (Woman-Man / Man-Woman), we wouldn't need an other human being to receive children. So when this is the fact (God created (all) organisms this way), we could give rise to exact the same hypothesis and exact the same results. So the Evolution Theory, although it can be partly used for this experiments and can bring good results, doesn't matter (any more than for example the Creationist' viewpoint). Therefore, I think the conclusion and the arguments are kind of misleading. I'm interested if you can see what point I'm trying to make. Hope you will be touched by the things I wrote and you (all) will take a critical look at the evolution theory. I found out for myself there is more than just what some people think there is. Based on what I found out, it's far bigger and more beautiful than we sometime can think of. Therefore, I would love you to discover this too. Good luck!

@Jonathan-ng9ic

7 жыл бұрын

Haha, I don't speak English very fluently, my bad. But you don't answer any of my point and give to me the impression that it's getting emotional for you ;-) . But if, what I'm saying is so easy, why you don't explain it to me? I'm open to serious pro-evolution answers man, but can't find it unfortunately. Watching the video again, for me, would not make sense. So maybe you can explain me a scientific answer on my ''stupid'' questions?

@guaflar

7 жыл бұрын

Jonathan "studied evolution", says 'kinds', brings up Big Bang theory for no reason (presented together? What kind of biology classes are you taking...), creationist copy pasta. Using standard religious buzzwords in conclusion. I think we all know how much you've actually studied evolution.

@Jonathan-ng9ic

7 жыл бұрын

+guaflar Don't mean a academic study, just for myself. And when I do, I don't have to do this all in English, so when I make a translating mistake, this say not that much. And funny see nobody can give me easy answer on my questions. Unfortunate because I'm open to it, but on the other hand probably makes things just a little more clear.

Really great videos, I like the animation/art style and the videos seem very well researched/informed. +1 sub

Finally, someone that can actually 'state clearly' the principles of evolution.

Evolution explains the diversity of life on earth, so, yes it matters

@danminer5343

4 жыл бұрын

The story of evolution has never explained anything. It is only a silly fiction story.

@HF06

4 жыл бұрын

Dan Miner I think you typed “Bible” wrong, mister

@danminer5343

4 жыл бұрын

@@HF06 - The Bible, as translated in English in the A.V./KJ version has been proven to be the most (and only) accurate history of the world by centuries of research. Never has any honest scientific statement been found that would show how evolution could occur and never has one iota of evidence been found to show that it could have occurred.i The story of evolution is only for people who want to be fools.

@HF06

4 жыл бұрын

Dan Miner No it has not, you’re just inventing things. Here’s a list of things that have already been disproved: Adam and Eve, the flood and the arch Exodus. The rest wasn’t proved lol. Evolution has been proved many even by THIS BLOODY VIDEO ON WHICH YOU’RE COMMENTING! Or did God put fossils and vestigial organs to trick us? Did he shape whales’ bone structures as a joke? You’re delusional

@danminer5343

4 жыл бұрын

@@edit8826 - M y friend, that is not the definition of "Evolution", that is the creation model operating as designed, using already information. God created each kind with up to millions of heterozygous places in the genomes to determine how much each part and system will grow to enable diversity and the ability to adapt while retaining the same exact anatomy. The human DNA has 10 millions places where heterozygocity could exist. Over time heterozygous alleles and modules tend to become more homozygous which results in LOSING information. Every dog has the same anatomy as each other, thus no evolutionary difference. Every cat has the same anatomy, thus no evolutio0nary difference. Every person on earth has the same anatomy. For this to be possible would require that every ancestor of each kind also had the same anatomy, thus, zero evidence for evolution. The evolution model requires that the only change that would be evolutionary would increase information, which has never occurred. The creation model is that God created each kind with the ability to live and reproduce which would require all parts and systems including a complete DNA being present in the beginning. The evolution model requires that every part, system, macro-molecule, proteins, enzymes, etc. appeared simply by naturalism only and every part and system could live and reproduce before being complete. No evolutionists has ever explained how anything in a cell or body system could originate by chance.  Darwinists HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO PRODUCE A SINGLE EXPLANATION OF HOW JUST ONE PROTEIN CAME INTO BEING.  A single protein has TOTALLY DEMOLISHED DARWINISM. DNA is essential for a single protein to form.  DNA cannot form without protein.  Protein cannot form without DNA.  Protein cannot form in the absence of protein.  Sixty separate proteins are needed for a single protein to form.  Protein cannot form in the absence of any one of these.  Protein cannot form with no ribosome.  Protein cannot form with no RNA.  Protein cannot form with ATP.  Protein cannot form without the mitochondria to manufacture ATP.  Protein cannot form without the cell nucleus.  Protein cannot form without the cytoplasm Protein cannot form in the absence of a single organelle in the cell.  And proteins are necessary for all the organelles in the cell to exist and function.  There can be no protein without these organelles.  YOU CANNOT HAVE ONE PART WITHOUT THE OTHER..

Great presentation! Besides the content, you guys are also teaching how to make presentations, and ultimately how to organize compelling arguments and how to teach.

I LOVE the and simplicity of your videos! It's inspirational to say the least! I want to make some on religion and basically everything else we all must educate ourselves on and seeing your success with these really gives me the drive. BRAVO!

So much said. So concise. Brilliant. Thank you!

Evolution is so orderly. It fits together so perfectly for the most part.

@alanthompson8515

4 жыл бұрын

TheUltimateN Well, perhaps. Pick a particular ongoing result of evolution and it's Poof! to perfection. Homo sapiens, to name just one (obvious ) example, is cobbled together using the biological equivalent of duct tape, with a list of poorly designed features than easily runs into double figures. Still, we function and reproduce, so OK. Pull back and take the broad view, and I agree with you and Darwin (pace the Creator reference): "There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.”

@alanthompson8515

4 жыл бұрын

@Dr Karl Pagan Dear ""Dr", please explain (i) "idiotic" and (ii) "fairy tales" . Thanks.

@alanthompson8515

4 жыл бұрын

@Dr Karl Pagan Thanks. I thought as much. Now would you please re-read my post to TheUltimateN and explain how anything therein could make me a protector of " ignorant Middle-Eastern fairy tales". BTW I'm not!

Your videos are awesome! I really enjoy watching them, keep it up!

This video was really polished and understandable. Keep up the good work.

These videos are amazing! You should do other subjects like computer science!

I LOVE your channel. Thanks so much for making these videos. Would you mind considering doing a video about comparing DNA, please? I have tried to research how scientists go about comparing different species' DNA, but I can't understand most of it. So, when they say humans and DNA share 98% of DNA I find that fascinating, but can't figure out how they actually compare the two. Thank you so much!

@drewpeschong3792

5 жыл бұрын

The simplified version of how they observe DNA is that because the proteins in them are made from different things in different parts, they are able to separate them (I think using shocks) similar to how if you were to shake up a mix of water and oil. Because of their density, they would separate through gravity.

Good video, your animation is superb, easy to understand. Keep em coming.

Science: Here are the facts, what conclusion can we draw from them. Religon: Here is the conclusion, what fact can we find to support it.

@alexthompson8977

5 жыл бұрын

George Foreman you know that that's not how theories come into being right? Scientists make guess without evidence of what they think would happen and try to find out if it's true

@Psych-dc7uc

5 жыл бұрын

yes and if the result disagrees with their hypothesis they will change it

@georgeforeman9666

3 жыл бұрын

J. Buxter-Fleener Give me one pice of data that proves creation.

@cristianbarillari2107

3 жыл бұрын

@@alexthompson8977 let's repeat the scientific method! 1. Observing a phenomenon 2. Making an hypothesis 3. Doing experiments to BROKE the hypothesis (not to prove it!) 4a. If the hypotesis doesn't broke, formule a theory (which is a model that explain reality obtained thru observations and evidences) 4b. If the hypothesis is broken by experiments, re-make an hypothesis. Hypotesis are different from theories.

@danminer5343

3 жыл бұрын

There are zero scientific facts supporting the fiction story of evolution. People only believe it because they want to live in the dark.

5:52 - prevent further leakages of virusus from animals. 2020- oh really?

Uh yeah it's kind of one of the greatest scientific discoveries of all time

@danminer5343

3 жыл бұрын

Evolutionism has been the basis for most false religions for 3,000 years for fools to swallow.

@logicalatheist1065

3 жыл бұрын

@@danminer5343 what??

@danminer5343

3 жыл бұрын

@@logicalatheist1065 Most false religions in the past had idols ... either of wooden image, of a stone image, or of a metal image.. Evolutionists use a mental image and all of their evidence is only imaginations, not of reality.

@logicalatheist1065

3 жыл бұрын

@@danminer5343 define evolutionist That's literally every scientist. You should care more about your education

@logicalatheist1065

3 жыл бұрын

@@danminer5343 no religion has ever been proven true so technically they're all false. Gods are gods a lot of religions had him Gods have only been debunked never proven to be true

Nahh. Everything came into existence in one week because an 8000 year old Jewish Zombie said so. Makes perfect sense. I can't write this in one go. I'm laughing too hard...

@theguy7931

4 жыл бұрын

And yet he calls him a zombie

I couldn't even grok the title. I was like, "is the fact that the earth is a sphere unworthwhile ?" "is apparent retrograde motion unappealing ? "

Something inside me was always drawn to the idea of evolution from my basic exposure to it in school. The videos you've made explain it WAY better and I'm not surprised that the people who taught me are still Creationists.

@logicalatheist1065

4 жыл бұрын

One should never learn science from a creationist

@laserfan17

3 жыл бұрын

It’s a fascinating concept, I’m glad some people like you actually have curiosity and are drawn towards it. Don’t ever let creationists distract you with their pseudoscience, it’s all crap.

@gmansard641

2 жыл бұрын

I feel very fortunate that my parents were very open minded, these topics were always open for discussion, and I remember watching National Geographic shows about the Leakeys and their discoveries.

@trallfraz

Жыл бұрын

@@logicalatheist1065 Guess who CREATED science??? That's right.....the Creator. Ask these Darwinists to explain the Bombardier Beatle? The Giraffe, electric eel, gecko, camel, etc., etc. It seems that most things on this earth would have died before, or during their so-called evolving. Really stupid when you THINK about it. The whales would've drowned trying to breath into the first pair of lungs because they didn't know they were supposed to rise up from the great depths of the ocean for oxygen. Evolution?? C'mon, man!!!

@logicalatheist1065

Жыл бұрын

@@trallfraz baseless assertion, no evidence?

It would be awesome to see videos about all the cases in which evolution can help us!

Excellent!!!! stated very clearly again, good job!

this just blew my mind. amazing videos man. amazing!

Excelent video. You should do a part 2. Genetic algorithms is another example why it matters, applied to engineering.

Evolution is fact. We don't know everything about it but we know it occurred. We should continue to study biology and evolution more while we can laugh at creationists and let them believe whatever delusional nonsense they want to believe.

great video, once again - sound advice: lower the mids a tad on the equalizer.

I loved this. Interesting and practical!

EXCELENTE!! Congratulations. Brasil.

Yes. The Theory of Evolution is the foundation of all modern biology.

A nice video about evolution, forgot I seen the unlisted version already.

These videos are really well done! I just wish you would switch to a different voice-over actor. The current VO doesn't feel as commanding as it could be. The info you're giving is so well crafted and the animation/illustrations are spot on. I just feel like it needs a stronger voice (male or female) and maybe a subtle background track wouldn't hurt either. :)

I studied biology and still I'm really interested in religion, thanks to my former high schools pastor. She was brilliant. She was so supportive of science yet always managed to never let her own believes down. She was the perfect example of being able to coexit and never to force anyone in to any believe, never telling anyone that they should not be into science, never doubt evolution. In fact she was referring to Genesis as a metaphor for evolution, which I found a stunning and such interesting, fascinating thought. It Never made me believe in what the bible said, but I took her course until I graduated and I think I still took so so much out of it. So with that being said, may her genes be passed on and the human population become more like her AND God bless her ☺️

@fullercrane1795

2 жыл бұрын

You studied biology? Then lets take the small fish for example. Why would you blindly believe evolution is causing fish to get smaller. Instead of looking at the obvious facts. The first thing a biologist should know is where the genes come from. A fish gets it's gense from both it's parents.

@blockblock376

2 жыл бұрын

@@fullercrane1795 I don't see how your statement contradicts evolution? It actually is exactly what evolution is lol The fish get the genes from its parents, which are also small, because being small, in the enviroment they live in, serves a purpose to them. If it didn't, they'd be less likely to successfully live to the age of procreation, less likely to find a mate, whatever. Over time, the smaller, more successfull fish get to procreate the most, so over hundreds of generation of fish, they become smaller and smaller until they reach the "perfect" size for their unique nische

@fullercrane1795

2 жыл бұрын

@@blockblock376 It has nothing to do with evolution. That is an assumption. Nor the environment. When someone is removing fish they are not changing the environment. I can't tell if you're being serious or not because I gave you the answer. The fish get their genes from their parents. So you remove all the big fish. Only the smaller ones will be breeding and their off spring is more likely to be small as their parents were. I've also studied biology. When comes to people health and how the body works. Evolution is not a part of it. So if you were studying anything you must of went to a Darwinian class.

@blockblock376

2 жыл бұрын

@@fullercrane1795 lol ok youre a troll

@fullercrane1795

2 жыл бұрын

@@blockblock376 No am serious. IDK what course you did. But I did AS level biology. Genes being past down to their off spring is not evolution. Any adaption or change is dependent on the parents biology. The fishes biology did not change to make them smaller. There was no new adaption or change happing. The main fishes that were left and able to produce off spring was the smaller ones. As they past down their genes making it likely there off spring will be small as well. That is not a change in biology.

I love how the animation showed the fish shrinking in suze, but the human growing in size.

@DrMontgomeryMontgomery

3 жыл бұрын

Yo, I haven't seen this one before. Nice comment!

It takes a lot of studying to make a video that seems so simple like this! Awsome

again, utterly fascinating. Thanks for posting!!!

I love how you accurately made HIV's genome a single strand. Power to accuracy!

thank you Jon , great video , and it has outstanding ideas to show how Evolution works

This is fascinating stuff! Thank you!

GREAT series, keep it up😀

Now I want a playlist explaining all pf the cards at 8:56 ..... Please !!!!

Great video... Keep it up bro

I love your channel! Can you do a video about 'convergent evolution'? There is barely any material about this on KZread.

I've been watching some of these and really enjoy them - very concise and fun! I am a bit concerned about seeing in this, and other videos here, the phrasing of humans as separate from other animals i.e."spillover from animals to people". It is stated throughout that we are interrelated, yet when referring to our own species, it speaks as if we are not. Its all very contradicting.

This is like the third time this has been reuploaded.

This is a very good video. It shows how the scientific world view matters.

Well done, easy to understand and promotes an appreciation for relevancy. Thank you

Nicely done. Thanks!

I have no more words to describe how amazed I am at this moment by beautiful simplicity and the quality of the information contained in this video :'D Great job, Stated Clearly :'D #Evolution #HIV

@danminer5343

4 жыл бұрын

Only those who are extremely anti-science and ignorant of the issue can believe the fairy tale fiction story of evolution.

1:10 yeah something strange is happening! its the fact that the guy gets fatter each year. he turned into a chungus

This is a seriously good channel!:)

I've been enlightened. :3 Great video.

131 Jehovah's Witnesses didn't like this video ...

@kennethbransford820

3 жыл бұрын

Jorge Lizaso == Where are you? Is it not all Christian organizations who don't like this video or is it just your Christian organization? === Evolution = Self Assembling Atoms = Impossible ====

I'm seeing a bit of a trend here ,Stated Clearly. You make this beautiful video, and the comment section gets utterly raped by creationnists... Such a shame.

@saurabh32able

6 жыл бұрын

MrHornfox im agnostic so u think everything in this universe and universe itself didn't created ? Do u have any ans ? who started life and how the universe came into existence ? main question is what is the root of root u agnostic arrogant close mind fools arr overconfident and also superstitious bcz u also blindly believe in stupid theories

@blackflash9935

5 жыл бұрын

saurabh attri I am an agnostic too but unlike you it seems I believe in the scientific method.And when you call such a stable and well tested theory such as evolution “stupid” I really think you should consider starting to think logically. When you look at higher level physics you can see its connections to chemistry.If you do the same for chemistry you see some of its connections with biology.You can see how it fits all together without the need of a god controlling it.Sure, a “god” could have created the universe and the rules on which it operates but we still can’t prove his nonexistence or his existence and it may take a very very long time before we find the answer and we might not even be able to do it.As such I think you should revisit the theories you call “stupid” to see that they really aren’t that because I don’t think that you pondering about whether there is a god or not will make you find the answer to that question.

This is a great video to prove the evelotionary theory! I enjoyed it very much.

That was awesome, really enjoyed it....can you do one on evolution, evolutionary female and male psychology and dating?

This channel is great

Can anybody tell me what a "kind" is supposed to be? Are dogs and wolves of the same kind? Are lions and tigers of the same kind? Are cattle and bison of the same kind? Are dolphins and killer whales of the same kind? What makes two animal populations of the same kind as opposed to a different kind? And why have I never found the term "kind" used to classify any living creature in any biology text book in my entire life?

@balzonurchin

8 жыл бұрын

+Edwin Luciano Are mud skippers and salamanders the same kind? ... Or maybe mud skippers and gobies are... But if salamanders are the same kind as mud skippers, then that would make gobies & salamanders the same kind, right? Are gobies the same kind as cod? And are cod the same kind as sharks? Are salamanders the same kind as caecilians? Are caecilians the same kind as worms? If the answer to all these is yes, then sharks must be the same kind as worms, I suppose.

@EdwinLuciano

8 жыл бұрын

+balzonurchin And in a sense, every living thing is of the same "kind" because every living creature we know of reproduces using molecules of nucleic acids. According to which translation your using, the Bible says says that bats are in the same "kind" as birds or fowls. If the definition of "kind" is that broad, why can't a human be a "kind" of ape or a "kind" of primate ? Surely humans are more closely related to chimps than bats are to either birds or fowls!

@slicx

8 жыл бұрын

+Edwin Luciano I hadn't noticed that before, about birds and bats, so I had to look it up. To quote Answers in Genesis, "The Hebrew word for bird is actually owph which means "fowl/winged creature." The word owph simply means "to fly" or "has a wing." So, the word includes birds, bats, and even flying insects. The alleged problem appears due to the translation of owph as bird. Birds are included in the word owph, but owph is not limited to birds. This shows that translators aren't always perfect when handling the inerrant Word of God."

@EdwinLuciano

8 жыл бұрын

***** Don't care. Bible's not for me. Goodbye.

@slicx

8 жыл бұрын

+Edwin Luciano Don't ask questions if you aren't interested in the answer

It's really useful VDO. Many thanks for producing this VDO.

@walkingcypress7314

8 жыл бұрын

Do you mean video

@vannanuon6077

8 жыл бұрын

yes. if u have other VDO, pls kindly recommend.

This was amazing, thank you! Very interesting! :)

Well if the world starts turning into a desert at a rapid rate, we got ourselves a solution to fix the problem. Yay for science! :)

@bosnakedisniksic

7 жыл бұрын

Did you not hear the caveat though? It only applies to semi-arid grasslands. Most desertification is happening due to climate change, drought, and deforestation.

I dislike how it is so often said that all living things have literally one single ancestor. There's no reason to believe that the chemical ingredients and environmental factors for the formation of life only existed in a single place, and at one point in time. And even if they did, it's quite the assumption to think that that place produced only exactly one organism that still has an unbroken chain of successors.

@ExtantFrodo2

7 жыл бұрын

There may have been another instance of abiogenesis, but it's line did not survive. If it had we'd see many instances of it (at least in the microbial world). It would necessarily be distinct from extant life due to the huge number of variables that go into any first life form. Along with that it would not be able to reproduce with any other life. You think species incompatibility is bad? Try mixing left and right handed genetics in one offspring.

@ablebaker8664

7 жыл бұрын

Niki Herl Indeed... considering the multitude of mechanisms that can cause biopolymers to assemble and the vast volume of the oceans, it would be unlikely that only one of them would produce minimally simple forms. Conditions for some biopolymers would be optimal in one type of environment while impossible in others so different molecular species likely had domains where one or two candidates competed. We have only a glimpse of how this gigantic global arena of protolife finally played out with the victors writing the historybooks. Prokaryotes probably went around gathering up whatever they could break down and some of it turned out to be indigestible. Mitochondria and chloroplasts were clearly entities in their own right at one time... and basically still are, maintaining their own separate reproductive lives as mutually symbiotic infections of their host cells.

@codeincomplete

7 жыл бұрын

It is "often said that all living things have literally one single ancestor"? By whom? Non-scientists? Evolutionary theories describe population dynamics and is the exact opposite of single individuals. Also with horizontal gene transfer being common in unicellular life, a layman's version of most common ancestor doesn't represent the common scientific consensus. Single place? Your obviously describing a non-scientific claim. Sorry, if I am wrong assuming that when you say "often said" that you are referring to scientists. If you are referring to something different, I would agree, yes it would be nice if the general public and media were better educated when it comes to the basics of abiogenesis and the theory of evolution. All said, most scientific theories are "dumbed down" (i.e. simplistic, idealized versions) so it is easier for people to learn and understand the basics.

@antiHUMANDesigns

7 жыл бұрын

Life cannot form if there is already life in the area, eating all the organic compounds. Best case scenario is if life started in two palces at the same time, but the chance is very igh that one would eat the other, still. It is not strange if all life on Earth is related. However, I fully agree that we cannot honestly claim that "all life on earth is related" when we know we haven't even found all life on Earrth, yet. But so far, all the life we've found have been related. If there were some unrealted grou pof lifeforms, we shoudl've found an example of it, by now, so it's quite safe to say they're all related, even if we can't claim to "know" that.

@ablebaker8664

7 жыл бұрын

antiHUMANDesigns ...and abiogenesis is more likely in a reducing atmosphere. It's still possible in a neutral atmosphere though it would take longer, but in an oxidizing atmosphere the presence of oxygen would tend to degrade the process.

What a great teaching. Well done.

This was an especially good episode. The fish experiment is excellent evidence. I hadn't heard of the relationship between animals & their environments. Thank you !

Adam conover's dad at 1:23

Students who may be disinterested or uncomfortable with the science of evolution often wonder why it is worth their time and effort to watch it 3 FUCKING TIMES ..

loved the vid , hopefully we'll see part 2 🌷😅

These are great examples!

You should do a collab with kurtzgesagt. :P

It drank its own pee!

@DoubIoons

7 жыл бұрын

tasty

Great channel guy!

thank you for these videos 💚

Who ever doesn't believe in evolution probably thinks the theory of gravity is wrong too and Donald Trump is the best.

@Soulkeeper99

8 жыл бұрын

+Geometry Dash AJ213 well, it's only a theory... I mean gravity :)

@Soulkeeper99

8 жыл бұрын

same as evolution

@Soulkeeper99

8 жыл бұрын

+robertelee2k9 truth seeker listverse.com/2011/11/19/8-examples-of-evolution-in-action/

@AJ213Probably

8 жыл бұрын

robertelee2k9 truth seeker lol you barley know what evolution is... what age are you? 60 or 10? I cant tell. So evolution is unlikely for you but a magical being coming from nothing and making everything from nothing that's backed up by nothing is more reliable to base all your beliefs by?

@Soulkeeper99

8 жыл бұрын

+robertelee2k9 truth seeker aaaaa I understand now. Nobody ever observed with his own eyes long term effect of evolution, so it's not true. Same as nobody ever observed with his own eyes continental drifting, or sun make at least 1 orbit around the Milky Way, change of earth's magnetic poles, or about anything that takes more time than few decades. Therefore none of this exists :D

Creation / intelligent design = primitive and delusional Absolutely evolution matters, nothing else explains the diversity of life

Very interesting. I want to know more stories.

This is the type of content I'd love to support on Patreon if I could afford to. At least I can subscribe and give the videos thumbs-ups.

I fucking love it. Holy hell. The theory (maybe we should start call it a fact) of evolution is one of the most fascinating things out there.

@rafayshakeel4812

3 жыл бұрын

Science cannot give us facts or truth. Science by nature is very limited, Justin 🙂 Please educate yourself on this topic. There were many famous & classical theories, but now no-one even remembers them. If science led us to the truth, then those famous & classical theories wouldn't have been false. Science cannot give us truth, but then you might think what it can give us? Well, it gives us workable theories. But even if a theory works, it's still not considered a fact or truth, because there can be a whole paradigm shift in the future. In fact, most of the things you use in your everyday life was created on a false theory. So, even though those theories worked, but they were wrong. There are many other ways to find truth, Justin 👍 Science is an excellent way to find Truth, but it's not the only one.

@Jo__o

3 жыл бұрын

@@rafayshakeel4812 dear stranger on the internet, things do evolve. The part of the *theory* begins when you are trying to explain how do they happen. As time moves on we have better ways to observe the universe. For example in the past some people used to think that the world was flat. Now when we have better methods to observe we can know for a fact that the world is certainly NOT flat. I said maybe we should start call it a fact since there are an overwhelming amount of evidence.

@rafayshakeel4812

3 жыл бұрын

@@Jo__o I agree with you on this, Justin 🙂 You seem to be a very honest & nice person. I don't have any problem with evolution, but I have a problem with Human evolution. We still don't have clear-cut evidence for Human evolution, yet some Atheists are trying to convince their audience about this theory, as if it's something undeniable. I love Science, but science does not give us truth. It gives us workable theories and through those workable theories, we have technological advancements. Anyway, I am curious about your World view? Are you an Atheist, Agnostic, Irreligious, Religious, etc...? You don't have to answer me if you're not comfortable with it.

@rafayshakeel4812

3 жыл бұрын

@Not smart and Christian You can leave this comment section if you want to. Don't try to play innocent in here.

@rafayshakeel4812

3 жыл бұрын

@Not smart and Christian Are you an Atheist or a Christian?

Is it a misconception that humans evolved from apes? It is safe to say that humans do have a common ancestor so are apes the best evidence thus far?

@KohuGaly

7 жыл бұрын

it's actually much more simple. We are simply one (of five) species of great apes. In a same sense that we are mammals, vertebrates, animals and eukaryotes. We were originally one species and we splitted up.

@TheBeatSmash

7 жыл бұрын

Stated Clearly who put us in the primate family tree. Because I'm pretty sure it was someone who didn't have enough evidence to do so, but in doing so it forces people to already be suceptable to believing in evolution cause someone already put them on a list of other species and said look were related! we're in the same category of species. but for some reason there is not a single primate that can breed with a different another variation of a so called primate called. also if we did evolve from primates why did we lose our tails? and don't tell me it's because we didn't need them. I would use the shit out of a tail, I could be reading the morning paper, drinking my coffee, and wiping my ass while in on the toilet with my tail

@Jonathan-ng9ic

7 жыл бұрын

+Stated Clearly Is this ever scientifically proven? Can you send me a link to some of this scientific proves(so which didn't need interpretation)? I would like to check them! Thanks in advance.

@ablebaker8664

7 жыл бұрын

Jonathan The most compelling evidence isn't fossil evidence. We have documented the human genome as well as nearly every extant primate as well as some extinct human species. Homo Sapiens has haplogroups which contain genes from homo neanderthalensus... which requires that we were close enough genetically that we could have fertile offspring... not quite full speciation. There examples of partial speciation in many species of animals who evolved from the same parental clade which can be Sometimes able to have fertile offspring. Ring species, for example. Because we have maps of all of these primate genomes we can compare them. Nested in among the primate genes are strands of retroviral DNA. When a retrovirus hijacks a cell it inserts a strand of DNA into the host cell's DNA. When a gamate cell is infected that marker can be passed along to the offspring. There are over 1000 examples of endogenous retroviral strands in the same locations in the same chromosomes. These provide markers that can be used to track our genetic relationships to other primates with definitive certainty. There is no possibility that we have these markers by coincidence. We have them because our ancestral clades passed them down to us.

@antiHUMANDesigns

7 жыл бұрын

A short explantion is that some mammals evolved into primates, and some primates evolved into monkeys (simians), and some monkeys evolved into apes, and some apes evolved into humans, jsut to mention the larger groupings and ignoring more specific groups. But while some primates evolved into monkeys, others evolved into other things, but they are all still primates, just different kinds of primates. Things never stop being what they are they only evolve to become new versions of that thing. Apes are a specific version of monkeys, it doesn't mean they're more or less "evolved" than other monkeys. Humans are [great] apes, monkeys, primates, mammals, vertebrates, and so on. Each "level" represents a larger and more diverse group. At the top level, we are "life", just like every other living thing on Earth. More precisely, humans evolved from the australopithecines, about 2.5 million years ago, which were also great apes.

The fish size experiment is fascinating

Beautiful! Thank you!

If scientists wanted you to know about evolution, they wouldn't hide it in a book. The best hiding spot from a creationist.

Thank you for speaking slowly. Too many informative, educational videos are narrated by cracked out hosts who feel the need to race through text. Let the information breathe and percolate in your mind. Well done.

@ramptonarsecandle

2 жыл бұрын

Most creationists are so f**ked up they don't understand unless you speak slowly, even then they seldom get it.

Awesome video!! Isn't Alan Savory's work still ... debated? I like how you handled it, but I hope Savory doesn't get shot down, which would reflect badly on your argument (for creatards anyway). Also, I hope Savory is right because his message is a hopeful one.

Amazing video! Thank you!

@jessebryant9233

5 жыл бұрын

What did you find so amazing about it? The fact that it presents evidence for the OPPOSITE of what is necessary for Darwinian mythology to be true? You are easily impressed! Kind of like a monkey and shiny objects... Besides that, there is nothing in the above that ANYBODY is objecting to. Stated Clearly, clearly equivocates on the term 'evolution'. They claim Darwin (common ancestry) and then merely appeal to what is observed, that being variation within and net loss, that can never result in fundamental changes of any kind. And losing is not gaining. Which is just basic math.