We produce animations on genetics, evolution, biology, and chemistry that are in line with NGSS standards for use in classrooms. If you find our work useful, please consider supporting us on Patreon (link below).
See "Mathematical Challenges to Darwin's Theory of Evolution".
@DocReasonable23 минут бұрын
Why? There's no such thing.
@golbez37942 сағат бұрын
wouldnt it be funny if evolution wasnt real and everything is just created by god and we are just observing something and connecting dots that arent really there?😂
@Mohammed-sk6rn4 сағат бұрын
These evidence don't prove evolution
@AATT-py7tn5 сағат бұрын
I'm sorry, there's nothing clean about a wooly mammoth that's never bathed soaked in tar!
@TheMadHouseCafe6 сағат бұрын
Evolution, my friends. Just as our fetuses resemble many other well-known life forms, this is ave has an evolutionary hold over. It's wonderful!
@DocReasonable6 сағат бұрын
*Now We Know Why Platypus Are So Weird - Their Genes Are Part Bird, Reptile, And Mammal* The duck-billed platypus is truly one of the oddest creatures on Earth. Along with the spiney echidna, these two Australian animals belong to a highly-specialised group of mammals, known as monotremes, which both lay eggs but also nurse their young with milk. The genes of both are relatively primitive and unchanged, revealing a bizarre blend of several vertebrate animal classes, including birds, reptiles, and mammals." "It was 166 million years ago that we last shared a common ancestor with platypuses," said study team member Jenny Graves, head of the Comparative Genomics Group at the Australian National University. "And that puts them somewhere between mammals and reptiles, because they still maintain quite a lot of reptilian characteristics that we’ve lost, for instance they still lay eggs." Live Science
@bunnybear-co1wn6 сағат бұрын
hgu *Believing in Aronra's cult leads to severe, painful and irreversible rtrdtion. For instance, the 66 year old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "randallwilks"/"ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"flandidlyandersFRS"/"maylingng"/"walkergarya" insisted that ostriches have no wings and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno as it can be seen in my last beautiful v1de0.*
@maylingng4107Сағат бұрын
A new sock account from Oscar/Larsen
@bunnybear-co1wn6 сағат бұрын
fdfd *My v5de0s show an evolurionist who is more evil than s-tan and more s-tp1d than a baby snail.*
@DocReasonable7 сағат бұрын
The word 'theory' has 2 meanings. In science, it means 'explanation of known facts supported by an overwhelming body of study and evidence'.
@bunnybear-co1wn6 сағат бұрын
*We got ur science when u insisted that ostriches have no wings and 250-237 means an increase of 23, rtrd Andrew.*
@DocReasonable6 сағат бұрын
@@bunnybear-co1wn The only thing U get is siffilus.
@zjow475510 сағат бұрын
Fascinating and scary if you think about it
@AutumnVine10111 сағат бұрын
Or you accept that a wonderful, loving Creator God thought through everything and then created it about 6000 years ago.
@rarra9 сағат бұрын
Although more like an angry punishing god than a loving one
@weltschmerzistofthaufig24405 сағат бұрын
Where's the evidence, buddy?
@followjesus756211 сағат бұрын
They didn’t evolve anything. That’s how these creatures were created by God, and not some primordial ooze.
@Your_claireyboo13 сағат бұрын
Why am I here-
@Your_claireyboo13 сағат бұрын
Why am I here-
@yasminmustafa588915 сағат бұрын
What a fantastic video! I was trying to explain it to my husband, and this video made it much easier!
@diegodankquixote-wry324215 сағат бұрын
I thought it was a moth stuck inside something lol
@coreylambrecht579716 сағат бұрын
Crystal clear evidence of the creative power of God’s handiwork. Thank you for posting this.
@hadiisaboss530715 сағат бұрын
God's work is very poor, not much of a omnipotent creator when he overlooks errors like cancer and downsydrome
@twintyara633016 сағат бұрын
This fish is fishing
@user-vw8ql4cx9z16 сағат бұрын
This is just stupid
@joscha980516 сағат бұрын
Evolution?
@hadiisaboss530716 сағат бұрын
Just because you can't understand biology doesn't make it dumb but instead you
@mig2five16 сағат бұрын
Society is stupid
@experience74116 сағат бұрын
Nope
@user-vw8ql4cx9z14 сағат бұрын
@@joscha9805 no
@Mohammed-sk6rn17 сағат бұрын
I don't know why people still believe in this science fiction?
@Lexi2019AURORA17 сағат бұрын
How is it sci Fi?
@Mohammed-sk6rn19 сағат бұрын
Evolution is only a theory not a fact.
@AMC228319 сағат бұрын
oops, instant loss of all credibility. a scientific theory is verified fact. we simply can't predict what'll happen to every gene for the rest of time. you should just be happy with your religious superstitions.
@bunnybear-co1wn7 сағат бұрын
@@AMC2283*U gained ur credibility when u insisted that ostriches have no wings, b-allet dancer A. Eldridge.*
@alantasman827319 сағат бұрын
Soft Dinosaur Tissues (dinosaur remains dipped in a mild acid solution) have now been found at dig sites on six continents since 2004. The tissues found include blood vessels, blood cells, collagen, end even partial DNA (DNA has a half-life of 521 years). Ask yourself how these tissues can survive 65+ million years when samples examined were often obtained within mere feet of ground surface where solar radiation and weather would have added to their swift degradation. Some short-term studies have been done to determine how these tissues could have survived for 65+ million years but none of them are scientifically plausible. There is a rich written history of man interacting with these creatures. Job 40 and Job 41 clearly speaks such creatures. Soft dinosaur tissue should put the lie to deep-time and evolution, yet although 120+ plus peer reviewed papers have been published on the subject....soft dinosaur tissue and its implication for fossil dating methods are ignored.
@1marcelo21 сағат бұрын
Yummy! That was a crunchy fish!
@prathamkataria757021 сағат бұрын
Told him to ignore the "worms in your area" pop-up
@SavonWilson-bq3zm23 сағат бұрын
Figured this out as a kid. Neat fact
@DocReasonable23 сағат бұрын
The world's only honest creationist says: "I have zero evidence for my magical beliefs, but I'm too much of a brainwashed imbecile to stop believing in mythological nonsense." And: "You have TONS of evidence for evolution, but I just don't want to believe it because it makes me cry."
@DocReasonable23 сағат бұрын
Larsen puts up videos that show him being destroyed by atheists in the most humiliating ways possible. I wonder why Larsen does this? It's as if he loathes himself as much as everyone else does.
@bunnybear-co1wnКүн бұрын
gfh *Believing in Aronra's cult leads to severe, painful and irreversible rtrdtion. For instance, the 66 year old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "randallwilks"/"ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"flandidlyandersFRS"/"maylingng"/"walkergarya" insisted that ostriches have no wings and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno as it can be seen in my last beautiful v1de0.*
@Lexi2019AURORAКүн бұрын
Show fossils of bunnies in Precambrian rock, and evolutionists will be quiet forever. Where are they??👀🧐
@DocReasonable23 сағат бұрын
@bunnybear-co1wn How many tr0lling accounts are U up to now, shhhthed?
@varyolla43523 сағат бұрын
Aug. 26, 2023......... p.s. - I think your bot is "hallucinating" as it appears to be in a jag creating repetitive sockpuppet accounts manifesting the same flawed nature.
@chasegordonnКүн бұрын
Definitely not crystal clear evidence for evolution. Crystal clear proof is an animal that has evolved from another animal, and can still breed with that animal that they once were. There is no proof today of an animal evolving into another animal.
@hadiisaboss530715 сағат бұрын
You're not talking about evolution though. you're talking about one branch of evolution, that being speciation.
@dcatterz7048Күн бұрын
Original claw likely developed to crack the egg badaboom
@ekklesiabible8188Күн бұрын
Reason sensible you look and you can easily see the results is the change in DNA engineering then you call the works of engineering and accident (evolution) that had to have worked out the mathematical equations needing by the engineer to create the change in DNA. But you are not reasonable to think the change is happening accidentally like the universe happened by accident. What a brain?
@FlandiddlyandersFRSКүн бұрын
Accidents happen all the time. For example: your mum had you.
@DocReasonable23 сағат бұрын
A shame U can't speak English. Or think straight.
@gcmgome19 сағат бұрын
Let me guess: with a user name which uses the Greek word for "church" and the word "bible", ...you want readers of your comment to consider an invisible wizard who lives forever and uses magical super powers to think things into existence as an alternative to evolution? Too bad for you and those who are similarly so easily duped into accepting such a preposterous idea, most of the people who will end up reading your comment actually understand evolution. An invisible entity derived entirely from human imagination is no substitution for evidence.
@matthewmillaneise6522Күн бұрын
That's not a backpack that's a jetpack
@DocReasonableКүн бұрын
Creatards claim the following to be impossible: 1. Walking fish (there are fish that walk on land) 2. Lung fish (there are multiple species, some of which can live on land for over a year) 3. Creatures that can go from gill-breathing to lung-breathing (every frog and toad does exactly this) 4. Animals that exhibit 'macroevolution (monotremes are between reptile and mammal). All the creatards have are lies and dishonest denials of reality.
@FlandiddlyandersFRS14 сағат бұрын
So true. 👏🤝🤜🤛
@walkergaryaКүн бұрын
According to your YEC dogma, all animals were created at one time. Therefore the fossil record, to support your frairy tale of creationism, should show all animals present in the beginning. It does not. We see a slow progression of increasingly complex animals starting in the late pre-Cambrian and progressing through time to the present with modern animals only existing in the latest time frame, exactly as Evolutionary Theory would predict.
@refreshinglymoist6145Күн бұрын
well thats a dire story.
@louis1614Күн бұрын
Same thing happened with allosaurus back in the Jurassic epoch
@FlandiddlyandersFRSКүн бұрын
😄 Anyone who thinks *The Fundamental Forces and Laws of Nature* have to be _"directed"_ by someone or some thing is obviously committing the logical fallacy of 'anthropomorphism' and should be laughed at and made to sit in the corner wearing the dunces hat.
@FlandiddlyandersFRSКүн бұрын
The God Lottery: You have 4,000-plus, to choose from but which one will give you the jackpot? Btw, 1.4 billion Chinese and 1.4 billion Indians do not believe in Jesus or Yehwah - Oops! ...plus 2 billion Muslims do not believe Jesus was the son of God. Oopsie.
@bijjushresthaКүн бұрын
Yeti
@jayyyyy3085Күн бұрын
Who else is here from science class
@DocReasonable23 сағат бұрын
None of the creationists, that's for sure.
@FlandiddlyandersFRS14 сағат бұрын
@@DocReasonable🤣
@TheStarflight41Күн бұрын
The mutation lottery: the only random process ever observed capable of both dazzling creativity and unsurpassed reliability. Of course, it has foresight and goals as well, as demonstrated in the genesis of interdependent and symbiotic relationships. Why is that? Crickets.... The properties of random, undirected processes are well known. Creativity and reliability are not among them. A random process has zero reliability. Yet the mechanism that took us from microbes to Michaelangelo is the most reliable process in the history of the world...
@AngelmouКүн бұрын
"genesis of interdependent and symbiotic relationships. " Is by selection from former parasitic or rival relationships. No big deal. "Why is that? Crickets." Nope, it is a very old hat in evolution research like flower petals and insects as example. Darwin himself even predicted a moth with giant proboscis fitting to an extreme flower calyx that was found shortly after predicted. You have just no clue about even old research. "The properties of random, undirected processes are well known. Creativity and reliability are not among them." You ignore the non random selection pressure part like always when you start to lie about the topic on purpose, like where you did lie by omission about the teethbird intermediates in-between the beakbirds and theropod dinosaurs or in this video with the beach/shore colony living whale intermediates wobbling on land before the offshore adaptations to the open sea, where you did try to sell the idea we would not have a gradual fossil record as observation. LOL
@Lexi2019AURORAКүн бұрын
🤦🏼♀️
@luvp0tionКүн бұрын
People will call you crazy for believing in the bible but will state that we‘re related to pumpkins in the same sentence 😐
@paulgarrett4474Күн бұрын
Can you explain why they are wrong?
@gusolsthoorn1002Күн бұрын
Gullible people believe nonsense like this. It is like changing a car into a boat by making minute gradual changes all the while ensuring the full functionity of the vehicle as it slowly changes. Couldn't be done even with intelligence. Imagine this all by random accidents. Ridiculous! The evidence is circumstantial at best. Similarities do not prove descent. If it did we could claim we humans came from octopus because we both have two eyes. Archaeopteryx is a perching bird, according to Dr. Feduccia, a well respected paleornithologist. We have perching birds today. Perching birds give rise to perching birds. Imagination is not valid science. This is pseudo science.
@SoulshaBoyКүн бұрын
That’s not how we do decent, you could absolutely turn a car to a boat, in evolution terms the car doesn’t need to turn into a boat in exactly it just needs to gain the functions of a boat, so it can float
@hadiisaboss530715 сағат бұрын
You're kinds there, it would more be like a family is mean to turn a car into a boat but everytime you failed you died and someone else who watched you try does it. With that pattern infinitely repeating
@FlandiddlyandersFRSКүн бұрын
Having nothing but faith in magic cosmic wizards will never turn mud into men or ribs into women.
@blobbertmcblob48882 күн бұрын
Plenty of birds still have claws on their wings.
@blobbertmcblob48882 күн бұрын
Fun fact: Dire "Wolves" were not wolves at all, in fact they may have been more closely related to the canid species which gave rise to foxes, there's also little evidence that they lived in organized packs, so may have been solitary.
@ryanferry692 күн бұрын
Time will never turn a dog into an elephant. A parrot and a banana do not have a common ancestor. Nothing exploding didn't create everything
@maylingng41072 күн бұрын
Evolution to a new species is a Fact; it has been observed in nature and was duplicated in the laboratory. You are in a dire need of a basic education in biology.
@FlandiddlyandersFRSКүн бұрын
Why are there no fluffy bunny rabbit fossils in cambrian era rocks? A: Because evolution is true.
@varyolla435Күн бұрын
Nice non sequitur - as well as an apparent ignorance of what the Bible itself claims. Moral: the Formation of the Universe per _"Big Bang"_ - a theory coincidentally generated by a priest who was also a physicist - does not predicate all came from "nothing". It rather reflects an expansion of = matter/energy - or _"something from something."_ Now if you want your supposed "something from nothing" - a logical oxymoron by the way as you can never have "nothing" since "nothing" then represents "something" = look to the Bible. The Bible states that before "God" created the Universe all was supposedly "void and without form"_ = *THAT* is "something from nothing".
@gcmgomeКүн бұрын
The sad part about your opening comment is that you do not seem to comprehend that in just a few words you have demonstrated how little you know about science.
@AngelmouКүн бұрын
Good day ryanferry, "Time will never turn a dog into an elephant." A dog turning into an elephant would debunk what evolution even teaches to begin with. As a dog is a wolf and canine variation who can't just abandon the canine genome to steal the Loxodon/Elefantine and Proboscidea genome of the distant mammal relative at all. Learn the topic evolution first before you post. "A parrot and a banana do not have a common ancestor." Both lifeforms you mention are still eukaryote cell clusters even today - of course all plantcellcluster variations incl. ginger monocot plant variations such as bananatrees and animalia cell cluster variations such as bird families of parrots share a common eukaryote cellular ancestor. "Nothing exploding didn't create everything" There was no nothingness state prior to existence. Nothing is not the default state that was in the need to deviate it into a secondary existence state. I have no clue where you get such nonsense imagination. You confuse also the term big bang with an explosion. The big bang as term is for the rapid expansion of an ALREADY EXISTING hot dense state, which had no prior nothingness state that was in the need to be shapeshifted there.
@Lexi2019AURORA2 күн бұрын
Oscar saved this video and "what's the evidence for evolution" in a playlist he titled "triple lobotomy". Surely that helps him locate these videos quickly to troll them. Gotta admire the dedication...if only he used it for better purposes.
@b4li72 күн бұрын
How does that creationist dude create so many alt account ? Did he have an access to illegal phone number generator ?
@Lexi2019AURORA2 күн бұрын
@@b4li7 maybe he's a serial killer. 👀🤔
@FlandiddlyandersFRSКүн бұрын
@@Lexi2019AURORA 🤣 you 📌🔨 it.
@thomashart75182 күн бұрын
"It's shocking to find how close John Dalton's drawings actually were to reality." His drawings: Literally just circles.
Пікірлер
See "Mathematical Challenges to Darwin's Theory of Evolution".
Why? There's no such thing.
wouldnt it be funny if evolution wasnt real and everything is just created by god and we are just observing something and connecting dots that arent really there?😂
These evidence don't prove evolution
I'm sorry, there's nothing clean about a wooly mammoth that's never bathed soaked in tar!
Evolution, my friends. Just as our fetuses resemble many other well-known life forms, this is ave has an evolutionary hold over. It's wonderful!
*Now We Know Why Platypus Are So Weird - Their Genes Are Part Bird, Reptile, And Mammal* The duck-billed platypus is truly one of the oddest creatures on Earth. Along with the spiney echidna, these two Australian animals belong to a highly-specialised group of mammals, known as monotremes, which both lay eggs but also nurse their young with milk. The genes of both are relatively primitive and unchanged, revealing a bizarre blend of several vertebrate animal classes, including birds, reptiles, and mammals." "It was 166 million years ago that we last shared a common ancestor with platypuses," said study team member Jenny Graves, head of the Comparative Genomics Group at the Australian National University. "And that puts them somewhere between mammals and reptiles, because they still maintain quite a lot of reptilian characteristics that we’ve lost, for instance they still lay eggs." Live Science
hgu *Believing in Aronra's cult leads to severe, painful and irreversible rtrdtion. For instance, the 66 year old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "randallwilks"/"ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"flandidlyandersFRS"/"maylingng"/"walkergarya" insisted that ostriches have no wings and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno as it can be seen in my last beautiful v1de0.*
A new sock account from Oscar/Larsen
fdfd *My v5de0s show an evolurionist who is more evil than s-tan and more s-tp1d than a baby snail.*
The word 'theory' has 2 meanings. In science, it means 'explanation of known facts supported by an overwhelming body of study and evidence'.
*We got ur science when u insisted that ostriches have no wings and 250-237 means an increase of 23, rtrd Andrew.*
@@bunnybear-co1wn The only thing U get is siffilus.
Fascinating and scary if you think about it
Or you accept that a wonderful, loving Creator God thought through everything and then created it about 6000 years ago.
Although more like an angry punishing god than a loving one
Where's the evidence, buddy?
They didn’t evolve anything. That’s how these creatures were created by God, and not some primordial ooze.
Why am I here-
Why am I here-
What a fantastic video! I was trying to explain it to my husband, and this video made it much easier!
I thought it was a moth stuck inside something lol
Crystal clear evidence of the creative power of God’s handiwork. Thank you for posting this.
God's work is very poor, not much of a omnipotent creator when he overlooks errors like cancer and downsydrome
This fish is fishing
This is just stupid
Evolution?
Just because you can't understand biology doesn't make it dumb but instead you
Society is stupid
Nope
@@joscha9805 no
I don't know why people still believe in this science fiction?
How is it sci Fi?
Evolution is only a theory not a fact.
oops, instant loss of all credibility. a scientific theory is verified fact. we simply can't predict what'll happen to every gene for the rest of time. you should just be happy with your religious superstitions.
@@AMC2283*U gained ur credibility when u insisted that ostriches have no wings, b-allet dancer A. Eldridge.*
Soft Dinosaur Tissues (dinosaur remains dipped in a mild acid solution) have now been found at dig sites on six continents since 2004. The tissues found include blood vessels, blood cells, collagen, end even partial DNA (DNA has a half-life of 521 years). Ask yourself how these tissues can survive 65+ million years when samples examined were often obtained within mere feet of ground surface where solar radiation and weather would have added to their swift degradation. Some short-term studies have been done to determine how these tissues could have survived for 65+ million years but none of them are scientifically plausible. There is a rich written history of man interacting with these creatures. Job 40 and Job 41 clearly speaks such creatures. Soft dinosaur tissue should put the lie to deep-time and evolution, yet although 120+ plus peer reviewed papers have been published on the subject....soft dinosaur tissue and its implication for fossil dating methods are ignored.
Yummy! That was a crunchy fish!
Told him to ignore the "worms in your area" pop-up
Figured this out as a kid. Neat fact
The world's only honest creationist says: "I have zero evidence for my magical beliefs, but I'm too much of a brainwashed imbecile to stop believing in mythological nonsense." And: "You have TONS of evidence for evolution, but I just don't want to believe it because it makes me cry."
Larsen puts up videos that show him being destroyed by atheists in the most humiliating ways possible. I wonder why Larsen does this? It's as if he loathes himself as much as everyone else does.
gfh *Believing in Aronra's cult leads to severe, painful and irreversible rtrdtion. For instance, the 66 year old b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "randallwilks"/"ergonomover"/"docreasonable"/"flandidlyandersFRS"/"maylingng"/"walkergarya" insisted that ostriches have no wings and the Italian translation of Saturday is Saturno as it can be seen in my last beautiful v1de0.*
Show fossils of bunnies in Precambrian rock, and evolutionists will be quiet forever. Where are they??👀🧐
@bunnybear-co1wn How many tr0lling accounts are U up to now, shhhthed?
Aug. 26, 2023......... p.s. - I think your bot is "hallucinating" as it appears to be in a jag creating repetitive sockpuppet accounts manifesting the same flawed nature.
Definitely not crystal clear evidence for evolution. Crystal clear proof is an animal that has evolved from another animal, and can still breed with that animal that they once were. There is no proof today of an animal evolving into another animal.
You're not talking about evolution though. you're talking about one branch of evolution, that being speciation.
Original claw likely developed to crack the egg badaboom
Reason sensible you look and you can easily see the results is the change in DNA engineering then you call the works of engineering and accident (evolution) that had to have worked out the mathematical equations needing by the engineer to create the change in DNA. But you are not reasonable to think the change is happening accidentally like the universe happened by accident. What a brain?
Accidents happen all the time. For example: your mum had you.
A shame U can't speak English. Or think straight.
Let me guess: with a user name which uses the Greek word for "church" and the word "bible", ...you want readers of your comment to consider an invisible wizard who lives forever and uses magical super powers to think things into existence as an alternative to evolution? Too bad for you and those who are similarly so easily duped into accepting such a preposterous idea, most of the people who will end up reading your comment actually understand evolution. An invisible entity derived entirely from human imagination is no substitution for evidence.
That's not a backpack that's a jetpack
Creatards claim the following to be impossible: 1. Walking fish (there are fish that walk on land) 2. Lung fish (there are multiple species, some of which can live on land for over a year) 3. Creatures that can go from gill-breathing to lung-breathing (every frog and toad does exactly this) 4. Animals that exhibit 'macroevolution (monotremes are between reptile and mammal). All the creatards have are lies and dishonest denials of reality.
So true. 👏🤝🤜🤛
According to your YEC dogma, all animals were created at one time. Therefore the fossil record, to support your frairy tale of creationism, should show all animals present in the beginning. It does not. We see a slow progression of increasingly complex animals starting in the late pre-Cambrian and progressing through time to the present with modern animals only existing in the latest time frame, exactly as Evolutionary Theory would predict.
well thats a dire story.
Same thing happened with allosaurus back in the Jurassic epoch
😄 Anyone who thinks *The Fundamental Forces and Laws of Nature* have to be _"directed"_ by someone or some thing is obviously committing the logical fallacy of 'anthropomorphism' and should be laughed at and made to sit in the corner wearing the dunces hat.
The God Lottery: You have 4,000-plus, to choose from but which one will give you the jackpot? Btw, 1.4 billion Chinese and 1.4 billion Indians do not believe in Jesus or Yehwah - Oops! ...plus 2 billion Muslims do not believe Jesus was the son of God. Oopsie.
Yeti
Who else is here from science class
None of the creationists, that's for sure.
@@DocReasonable🤣
The mutation lottery: the only random process ever observed capable of both dazzling creativity and unsurpassed reliability. Of course, it has foresight and goals as well, as demonstrated in the genesis of interdependent and symbiotic relationships. Why is that? Crickets.... The properties of random, undirected processes are well known. Creativity and reliability are not among them. A random process has zero reliability. Yet the mechanism that took us from microbes to Michaelangelo is the most reliable process in the history of the world...
"genesis of interdependent and symbiotic relationships. " Is by selection from former parasitic or rival relationships. No big deal. "Why is that? Crickets." Nope, it is a very old hat in evolution research like flower petals and insects as example. Darwin himself even predicted a moth with giant proboscis fitting to an extreme flower calyx that was found shortly after predicted. You have just no clue about even old research. "The properties of random, undirected processes are well known. Creativity and reliability are not among them." You ignore the non random selection pressure part like always when you start to lie about the topic on purpose, like where you did lie by omission about the teethbird intermediates in-between the beakbirds and theropod dinosaurs or in this video with the beach/shore colony living whale intermediates wobbling on land before the offshore adaptations to the open sea, where you did try to sell the idea we would not have a gradual fossil record as observation. LOL
🤦🏼♀️
People will call you crazy for believing in the bible but will state that we‘re related to pumpkins in the same sentence 😐
Can you explain why they are wrong?
Gullible people believe nonsense like this. It is like changing a car into a boat by making minute gradual changes all the while ensuring the full functionity of the vehicle as it slowly changes. Couldn't be done even with intelligence. Imagine this all by random accidents. Ridiculous! The evidence is circumstantial at best. Similarities do not prove descent. If it did we could claim we humans came from octopus because we both have two eyes. Archaeopteryx is a perching bird, according to Dr. Feduccia, a well respected paleornithologist. We have perching birds today. Perching birds give rise to perching birds. Imagination is not valid science. This is pseudo science.
That’s not how we do decent, you could absolutely turn a car to a boat, in evolution terms the car doesn’t need to turn into a boat in exactly it just needs to gain the functions of a boat, so it can float
You're kinds there, it would more be like a family is mean to turn a car into a boat but everytime you failed you died and someone else who watched you try does it. With that pattern infinitely repeating
Having nothing but faith in magic cosmic wizards will never turn mud into men or ribs into women.
Plenty of birds still have claws on their wings.
Fun fact: Dire "Wolves" were not wolves at all, in fact they may have been more closely related to the canid species which gave rise to foxes, there's also little evidence that they lived in organized packs, so may have been solitary.
Time will never turn a dog into an elephant. A parrot and a banana do not have a common ancestor. Nothing exploding didn't create everything
Evolution to a new species is a Fact; it has been observed in nature and was duplicated in the laboratory. You are in a dire need of a basic education in biology.
Why are there no fluffy bunny rabbit fossils in cambrian era rocks? A: Because evolution is true.
Nice non sequitur - as well as an apparent ignorance of what the Bible itself claims. Moral: the Formation of the Universe per _"Big Bang"_ - a theory coincidentally generated by a priest who was also a physicist - does not predicate all came from "nothing". It rather reflects an expansion of = matter/energy - or _"something from something."_ Now if you want your supposed "something from nothing" - a logical oxymoron by the way as you can never have "nothing" since "nothing" then represents "something" = look to the Bible. The Bible states that before "God" created the Universe all was supposedly "void and without form"_ = *THAT* is "something from nothing".
The sad part about your opening comment is that you do not seem to comprehend that in just a few words you have demonstrated how little you know about science.
Good day ryanferry, "Time will never turn a dog into an elephant." A dog turning into an elephant would debunk what evolution even teaches to begin with. As a dog is a wolf and canine variation who can't just abandon the canine genome to steal the Loxodon/Elefantine and Proboscidea genome of the distant mammal relative at all. Learn the topic evolution first before you post. "A parrot and a banana do not have a common ancestor." Both lifeforms you mention are still eukaryote cell clusters even today - of course all plantcellcluster variations incl. ginger monocot plant variations such as bananatrees and animalia cell cluster variations such as bird families of parrots share a common eukaryote cellular ancestor. "Nothing exploding didn't create everything" There was no nothingness state prior to existence. Nothing is not the default state that was in the need to deviate it into a secondary existence state. I have no clue where you get such nonsense imagination. You confuse also the term big bang with an explosion. The big bang as term is for the rapid expansion of an ALREADY EXISTING hot dense state, which had no prior nothingness state that was in the need to be shapeshifted there.
Oscar saved this video and "what's the evidence for evolution" in a playlist he titled "triple lobotomy". Surely that helps him locate these videos quickly to troll them. Gotta admire the dedication...if only he used it for better purposes.
How does that creationist dude create so many alt account ? Did he have an access to illegal phone number generator ?
@@b4li7 maybe he's a serial killer. 👀🤔
@@Lexi2019AURORA 🤣 you 📌🔨 it.
"It's shocking to find how close John Dalton's drawings actually were to reality." His drawings: Literally just circles.
God squad doesn't think so 😊😊