Imagine if all of life was just a game show and once we figured out the origin of life, space opens up like giant curtains and there’s just giant alien/cosmic beings clapping for us 👏🏼

@dembears95

3 жыл бұрын

I think you just broke me

@jayyemm69

3 жыл бұрын

@@dembears95 just something to think about 😂

@jam9235

3 жыл бұрын

ok, r u ready, where did the aliens come from ? thx for nothing... lol

@jayyemm69

3 жыл бұрын

@Richard Fox exactly 😂

@jayyemm69

3 жыл бұрын

@@jam9235 they were always there O_o

"i made pee without peeing" that made me laugh

@simonelampertico121

4 жыл бұрын

????? Ajahqjqqhqq good one

@Danquebec01

4 жыл бұрын

Especially the applauding. :D

@ianmiao3788

4 жыл бұрын

You spoiled it!

@seanandrews5329

4 жыл бұрын

ahghaghghgahgahgahagahaghhga ok boomer

I lost it at "foot molecules". That really tickled me.

@seanandrews5329

4 жыл бұрын

your mother tickled me

@niftytheundying

3 жыл бұрын

Sean Andrews ha ha ha you got the whole squad laughing

@oradoughball

3 жыл бұрын

"I made pee without peeing" got me.🤣

@joannaconde5764

3 жыл бұрын

@@seanandrews5329 LMFAOO PLSS

@aue82a

9 күн бұрын

that one knocked my socks off.

I like him honestly stating that 'science has not explained the origin of life in full detail'. It is important, as a scientist, to clarify and understand what can be explained and what cannot be explained yet. Also summarized well about the findings so far.

@MikkoRantalainen

Жыл бұрын

I think the two most important differences between religion and science is that: 1. It's okay to say "we don't yet know" in science. Religions are about using once guessed explanations as "knowledge". 2. When measurements show that the written "knowledge" doesn't match with the reality, the "knowledge" is fixed.

@closrod335

5 ай бұрын

"The more I study science," he remarked, "the more I believe in God." -Albert Einstein “Gravity explains the motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who sets the planets in motion.” -Isaac Newton “DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created.” -Bill Gates “With odds standing at 1 chance in 10164 of finding a functional protein among the possible 150-amino-acid compounds, the probability is 84 orders of magnitude (or powers of ten) smaller than the probability of finding the marked particle in the whole universe. Another way to say that is the probability of finding a functional protein by chance alone is a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion times smaller than the odds of finding a single specified particle among all the particles in the universe.” --Stephen C. Meyer. “Another source of conviction in the existence of God, connected with the reason and not with the feelings, impresses me as having much more weight. This follows from the extreme difficulty or rather impossibility of conceiving this immense and wonderful universe, including man with his capacity of looking far backwards and far into futurity, as the result of blind chance or necessity. When thus reflecting I feel compelled to look to a First Cause having an intelligent mind in some degree analogous to that of man; and I deserve to be called a Theist.” -Charles Darwin

Gosh... I wanted to read the comments to enlighten a little bit more, but it's filled with Atheist x Religion discuss...

@tadashimori

8 жыл бұрын

rushy scoper After studying astronomy, my conclusions where a little bit different than yours, and maybe more depressing... There are several cases in the universe where something looks to be in perfect balance, but the truth is something called "survival bias". It was not in balance in the beginning, but it just happened that the universe got rid of everything else. If I apply it to humans and evolution, I do believe we just survived according to evolution, but this still doesn't explain the origin of life. The wish to live has to come from somewhere. After reading a little about the chemical evolution, it looks possible for cells to start randomly, but what would make it have the wish to survive? That's where I associated with the survival bias in the universe. If billions of random "fat blobs" were created, and a few of them just randomly had something inside that made them survive, or even divide for random reasons, after some time (aka million years) it could possibly have had one key mutation, making it stay existing. If all the billions of blobs died, then I'd say the "key mutation" is what we call the will to survive. I mean, even unicellular bacterias seems to have the will to survive without having a single brain cell.

@rushyscoper1651

8 жыл бұрын

Tadashi Mori yeah i have thought about it once. i have to say your answer is very logical we have a very similar pattern of thinking. to some level i am with u in your conclusions in why life have survival bias to add to that its even explain one of my oldest question (if survival is the key why speics fight each other instead to survival as a whole). in another hand i would say that this is my final answer but i still have one question that it don't explain why we don't live for ever like Turritopsis dohrnii instead we design to die. anyway i really like your way of thinking if u have any idea about my question feel free to share

@tadashimori

8 жыл бұрын

rushy scoper Sorry, I didn't see that you replied my answer earlier. Giving a thought about the question about dying x surviving forever, indeed this question can lead to so many other questions... It's kind of a key to understand how evolution works. I was trying to find out an answer, but there's no obvious answer. Of course the general idea would be that mutations are good to experiment different patterns and find the best genetic code for the ever changing environment, one "imortal" being would not have the same capabilities to adapt. Still.. this answer is so vague I can't even consider it an answer. What lead the living beings to divide in male/female? Even more, there are living being that didn't divide at all and are still living today, so it's not a key mutation. Man... this is really interesting. I'll research more about it!

@diceman199

8 жыл бұрын

+rushy scoper As Tadashi said, if an organism doesn't die it also doesn't change. If you look at complex life (non singled celled forms) you'll find that they normally live long enough to reproduce and then it starts to die off. In some species that produce many young in one go (salmon for instance) it reproduces just once and dies. In other extremes where it's normal for a single offspring then the organism will normally live long enough to reproduce 4 or 5 times, possibly more, ie enough to ensure the continuation of the species. This means a shorter life span gives a more rapid "turnover" in evolutionary possibilities if you will. So any organism that does not reproduce will be out competed for resources....maybe not by it's generation but by it's competitors a few generations down the line......this is why nothing lives for ever.

@tadashimori

8 жыл бұрын

They actually do. Some bacterias kind of "run away" from while cells inside our bodies. I'm aware that it's some sort of simple water concentration difference, but it clearly selected the right things to "run away" from.

"Science can't explain it _yet_ so it must've been *magic*!"

@tjhookit

8 жыл бұрын

+Thrall079 Meanwhile the evolutionists believe it is logical to believe that we literally came from a rock.....because the universe suddenly banged into existence, it rained heavily on the rock surface of the earth, and the chemicals leaked from the rock into the waters.....and bodabing bodaboom....life starts!

@Thrall079

8 жыл бұрын

+Todd Johnson Obviously we don't have a sufficient explanation for abiogenesis... but magic is what you're going with to explain it? A being that is all-powerful, knows everything, and is capable of conscious thought and decision making? And this being cares whether you masturbate or not?

@tjhookit

8 жыл бұрын

Thrall079 So you have zero idea how life started, or what MY beliefs are....but you call me "fucking retarded"? That tells me all I need to know about you.

@tjhookit

8 жыл бұрын

***** Yeah you are right, waste of time.

@giveitarub7215

8 жыл бұрын

+Todd Johnson And you believe a magical man in the sky "created himself from nothing" and spontaneously made, over 100 different standalone chemicals, millions of species, and trillions of stars in an entire universe spanning over a million light years wide, that watches EVERY persons moves all at once, and if you don't bow down to him and live by him your "soul" (somehow magically created through sexual reproduction) will suffer an eternity in a firey place and burn for all eternity. All documented in a book written and edited by Kings to their liking nearly two thousand years before science started becoming extremely advanced? Yet our heads are stuck in a ostrich's behind. Ok.

reading the comment section is giving me more of a headache than taking my science quiz tomorrow.

@billy9144

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah so many retards here.

@leekenyon8705

3 жыл бұрын

The first life is still a big ? to scientist all the theories having to many weaknesses and flaws and now to work on the math of creating life from randomly throwing inorganic materials together and now for alternates created by crazy people 1 We have fanatics' that believe a large impact on mars accrued around 4 billion years ago and that a fragment of mars landed on the earth during this period and began life on the earth 2 Origins of life on earth began after the evacuation of the intellect life from mars who stopped by the earth on their way out of the solar system and then pulled down their pants and took a large dump beginning life on the earth thus we are forever known as the living turd planet.

@studygodsword5937

3 жыл бұрын

@@billy9144 can you believe how many people actually believe the evolution garbage ?

@billy9144

3 жыл бұрын

@@studygodsword5937 Evolution is a fact. LOL. www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/ Imagine being this stupid that you deny science by default in favor of unfalsifiable myth supported by no evidence whatsoever. LMFAO!!!!

@studygodsword5937

3 жыл бұрын

@@billy9144 *5 undeniable facts* Abiogenesis is totally impossible ! Life is far to complicated to be formed by accident ! even if it did form "accidentally" what would it eat, how would it know it needed to eat, how would it have the ability to eat ! it would be the first life form ever ! How would it have developed those properties ! Please don't wast my time with that franken-life altering existing life, and calling it new life ! Or that dead stuff experiment, forming lifeless amino acids ! *your theory can't even get to evolution ! *continued !*

Extremely simplified, but containing absolutely no falsehoods or misleading pseudo-facts. i like!

@rayboish

5 жыл бұрын

What do you mean no falsehoods, he completely ignores the Cambrian explosion, and where the genetic information came from for species changing ie fish to mammal. Darwins theory only explains Micro evolution which we see in Natural selection . For example different types of cats, from a domestic cat to a Lion. What Darwin did say in his work The Origin of species in 1859 that eventually the fossil record will show the transition species . Here we are 160 yrs later and no transition species and we have millions of fossils. Like gives birth to like, the genetic information is just NOT THERE to jump from one species to another. If Darwin was around now he would refute his own theory.

@pbaylis1

5 жыл бұрын

You hit the nail on the head with "extremely simplified". Simplification allows you to omit vital details, like why we have found half a million fish fossils but not one single transitional form, why there are no transitional forms for plants, or why DNA cannot produce any usable new information. Why do you think Gould & Eldridge have been pulling their hair out over this for decades.

@lfidarraga

5 жыл бұрын

Theres a lot of pseudo facts. There's no evidence of spontaneous creation of self replicating molecules. The assembly of molecules like ARN are impossible to happen spontaneously.

@lfidarraga

4 жыл бұрын

@@edit8826 it's ARN in my native language

@lfidarraga

4 жыл бұрын

@@edit8826 hear*

Thank you very much for your videos. You explain concepts very well so that they can be easily understood by everyone, yet you don't sacrifice depth when covering these topics.

I love how all the people who support the fact of evolution comment show proof to hold up their statesment, while the creationist just say say, "God made the earth." Or they try to prove God exists... By using the Bible as their evidence... Seriously? Why use the Bible to show a person who doesn't believe in the Bible that the Bible is truth.

@lionelmessi8380

8 жыл бұрын

Bible is JUST A FUCKING BOOK THATS A FAIRY TALE. CREATIONIST FUCK OFF

@TimberWulfIsHere

8 жыл бұрын

Its like us christains pointing a sword at you, you by saying that you dont believe in our sword doesnt stop us from stabbing you with it. The bible is a historical document, not a book of science

@LosloTypical

8 жыл бұрын

Jake Forster the bible is a fairy tale, written by 40 different, racist, sexist, and homophobic men.

@TimberWulfIsHere

8 жыл бұрын

Nebiru next joke please, you just sound like a butthurt atheist with no evidence to support, since when was moses scared of gay men

@TimberWulfIsHere

8 жыл бұрын

Self Fulfilling Prophet you also forgot the 10 commandments were not even written by a human hand, its god's law on stone

_"At the molecular level, geochemistry is indistinguishable from biochemistry. Life is just ions cascading across membranes due to their electromagnetic potential._ _It really is as simple as that."_ - Professor Brian Cox

Short answer: not yet! But that doesn’t mean we know nothing, we know a lot actually.

@dave1370

2 жыл бұрын

Right, we know enough to know that the more we learn the less we actually know, and the more unlikely naturalistic abiogenesis looks.

@chikkipop

Жыл бұрын

@@dave1370 Therefore Jeebus Saves! Uh-huh. Sure.

@redsusas00

Ай бұрын

@@chikkipopsounds like ur coping lol

@VaughanMcCue

20 күн бұрын

@@dave1370 That comment is the logic of a grade school child. If you try with a better syllogism, you might make sense.

@iloveparadise

12 күн бұрын

The usual empty smugness of an atheist. You people can speculate all​ you want about how life cane about, but we believers already know that "God is the source of life" @@VaughanMcCue

I just watched an extremely well made, enjoyable and educational video. It stimulated my mind and made me think. Then I read the comments and I cried.

Why isn't this stuff on Discovery Channel prime time? Oh because Amish Mafia is on then. Nevermind

@AzureFides

7 жыл бұрын

I miss old Discovery channel so much ... same as "History" channel.

@ceecee685

6 жыл бұрын

+fides5566 don't forget "MTV!" remember the days when they used to play music videos and have news about the music industry? yeah, me neither... ok, well barely. :/

@simoprdev3517

6 жыл бұрын

because those claims are not proven, so they can't be said to be science. and they are not religious either. So!

@FabricioSilva-ij8iz

6 жыл бұрын

Science "proves" nothing. It gives theoretical models to explain facts observed in natural world. The best model to explain biology is the Theory of Evolution.

@meis

6 жыл бұрын

It's part of the evolution. From without internet to having internet access for the masses. So those Discovery Channel, History Channel, and MTV (aka traditional TV) will or have to be phased out to some degrees. It's more convenient for the internet and smartphones. It's almost "natural selection". You discard useless "traits" to survive and adapt useful "traits" to survive. Discovery Channel, History Channel, and MTV had to change in order to adapt as well, or they will die out. Evolution and natural selection are everywhere.

Thank you for making this video. I was looking for a video like this.

You did an excellent job of simplifying

This makes more sense to me than a male conservative "creator" who doesn't want us to masturbate.

@trustedlogamers

10 жыл бұрын

he isnt male

@gunterra1

10 жыл бұрын

trustedlogamers Good point. I personally prefer God to be a women. And who is to say that there is only one God. Some tell us that there are many, and even gods above the gods of universes. This makes more sense and for a much better game, for sure. If there would only be one then he/she would certainly go mad quite soon. Just imagine being The Only One. No game at all. Wouldn't that drive anyone crazy, goods included. I don't know about you guys, but I have no doubt about that. And as far as the universe (physical) is concerned, built on nothing but destructive force, I think that it is a dope head's universe. If I were to be God I and together with a few other decent fellows could have build a much better one. Don't be shy. Think about it.

@gunterra1

10 жыл бұрын

***** Not really. Those men tried to explain things the best they knew then. And, quite frankly, I would also not put it past them to also be politically motivated by the 'need' to control people. As to male of female, I propose we put it to a vote. :)

@heatblaze123

10 жыл бұрын

So a process with no will or reason to create life out of no where makes more sense? Whats the origin of the meteorite? How does it come into existence?

@heatblaze123

9 жыл бұрын

***** I'm just saying we may never truly know or at least not yet.

Nice video, simple and easy to understand. But of course one still needs and open mind to comprehend it.

@gunterra1

10 жыл бұрын

Agreed.

@aweiss5206

2 жыл бұрын

An open what?

@ashtonmmton1554

2 жыл бұрын

Simple and easy to understand because it's a bunch of garbage lol

@VaughanMcCue

20 күн бұрын

@@ashtonmmton1554 Do you have a better suggestion?

@ashtonmmton1554

19 күн бұрын

@@VaughanMcCue yes a creator

I really got to say you guys do a great job thank you for the information I so appreciate it

Very good video and explained.. Appreciated

"I don't understand and I don't like it so it can't be true."

@giveitarub7215

8 жыл бұрын

+Clorox Bleach Where's your proof to show that evolution isnt possible? Because you havnt been able to witness a multi-million year change in the course of your pitiful lifetime? Get the fuck out of here.

@giveitarub7215

8 жыл бұрын

***** Show it to me please?

@giveitarub7215

8 жыл бұрын

***** Wow that's really good evidence!! By the way that isn't evidence, it's a claim.

@anthonyrymer4391

8 жыл бұрын

+Clorox Bleach If you learn about the world a little bit and all its different cultures and then also learn about the past civilizations that predate the bible and quran. You would see that humans are just gullible and ignorant creatures that'll believe in anything they been taught since a young age to explain the unexplained. There's is no designer, life just happens naturally. Scientist even proved they gotten the simplest forms of life from chemical reactions from non-living compounds.

@giveitarub7215

8 жыл бұрын

***** Well what you said literally is no where near evidence whatsoever. "Things are sophisticated so it must be a magical invisible man who did it" Like yeah ok.

Love the video. This was an area I knew little about. I've always likened the origins of life to something akin to Conway's Game of Life or some other type of cellular automate.

Wow....I really love science! Evolution sounds very interesting!!!

@earthernut4073

2 жыл бұрын

Evolution indeed is very interesting! In fact, it's one of the topic containing diverse arena of subtopics which intertwine together to reveal mystery behind our existence in the universe.

Very good. Thanks researchers!

The answer is yes. Science CAN EXPLAIN the origin of life. Of course, scientists are still working on details of explanations of various possible origins of life, and its possible that we may never know for sure which possible origin of life was THE origin of life that actually allowed the beginnings of the evolutionary path that produced us, but whatever it was, given enough time and effort, and a sufficient opportunity to work out an explanation, science most certainly is capable of being used as a tool to do so successfully... so, yes. Science can.

@gunterra1

10 жыл бұрын

You sound like a true believer. What branch of science? And who is going to do that? I have my doubts. All subjects have as their basis a point of first assumption. In man's technology this is usually weak and nonfactual. So it would be very interesting to know what that point exactly is in this case. Since you are so convinced, any idea?

@DonaldKronos

10 жыл бұрын

Gunter Raffel Science is a process. The process is not restricted to functioning within branches.

@DonaldKronos

10 жыл бұрын

Gunter Raffel It may be that science already has explained the origin of life here on Earth, as there are theories of abiogenesis which explain quite well how life could have gotten started on a planet like this one, and very likely how life did start on many planets much like this one, but since we can't travel back in time to see exactly how life on this planet started, we wouldn't necessarily recognize an explanation of how life on this planet started if he had one. That does not mean we can't come up with an explanation. It simply means we may not know for certain exactly when we have done so. It's a bit like if I were to foll a six sided dice a million times, and then ask you to theorize what numbers came up on the first three rolls. You know they were each in the range of one through six, so you have one chance in six of getting any one of them right in a single try, and if you guess each of those possible values once as the first number that came up, you are certain to have gotten that first number right... but on which guess? Of course, the kind of life we have on this planet tells us quite a bit about the possibilities for its origin, as do other factors such as the chemicals available on our planet to work with, the size of the planet, the distance from our local star, details about the Earth's moon, and so on. However, if life on this planet was planted here by life from somewhere else, instead of happening through abiogenesis, how would we know that? The answer is that we wouldn't know for sure unless sufficient evidence had been left behind, and that does not appear to be the case. If life had been brought here from another planet, for example, we would not expect to find something like the Cambrian explosion, UNLESS the life brought here had been si simple that the evidence left behind would likely give us no clue that life had not formed here on its own, while we would definitely expect an event of that type with abiogenesis forming primitive life, because random changes would at first have little or no distinct advantages or disadvantages, and the early structured multi-cellular life forms would have likely had too much simpler life around it to consume as food for any meaningful competition to begin. If the origin of life matched any religion's creation story, since all such stories (at least that I'm aware of) involve higher order life forms being made at about the same time which were quite different from each other, rather than evolving out of more primitive forms, we should see evidence as such in the fossil records, which we do not. Of course, it is possible that some such story is true but does not go into enough detail, for example leaving out any mention of evolution being used in the process over long time scales, but if that were the case then we should see evidence in the fossil records of life having come about in the order mentioned in such a story. Again.... we do not.

@gunterra1

10 жыл бұрын

You have added nothing meaningful or new. The video presentation already said it all that is to be said. So why repeat it?

@DonaldKronos

10 жыл бұрын

Gunter Raffel I wasn't repeating. I was answering the question. And no, the video did not say it all, nor did it actually answer the question.... so I did.

Not sure how I got to this channel, but I'm glad I found it! Simple explanations and really cool animations, well done

@muchico8600

4 жыл бұрын

ArchetypeGotoh yeah that’s right

@Nicky-cc2tr

3 жыл бұрын

shutup

@corruptneedles3384

3 жыл бұрын

@@Nicky-cc2tr you too

@jam9235

3 жыл бұрын

Yep, incredibly complex structures are explained so simply. Wow and they call Christians simple minded ?

wonderful explanation. thank you.

Educational shows and great accompanying graphics.

It amazes me how some religious people almost shit their pants on the idea that there is things that we yet don't know. There is a lot of things that we don't know but when it comes to the origin of life they are so freaked out that they rather oppress and ignore what we actually know and put some sort of vague place holder deity in that spot instead. They seems to feel so much better when they don't have to think about this at all. The fact that they perhaps wasn't created specificity for some glorious purpose obviously make some people very uncomfortable, it makes them loose all that can be called being rational and logic. You are OK as you are. It's OK for you not to know everything because we have all resources to find out more about the world we live in, we have done so for a really long time now and it's working out fine. You are fully capable about making your own future and find out what suits you and what makes you happy, you don't need anyone else to do this for you.

@Mexitian

6 жыл бұрын

wooe true, we can't go past what happened before the big bang or what really caused it, there are many questions about our bodies, atoms, space, etc but since we can't give proper evidence, and this is all just theory they go with some fairytale concerning someone named 'god' but yet god is also a theory and there is no evidence at all he is real, what if the bible was written to be a children's boom?

@tonydavis6151

6 жыл бұрын

Wooe i have no problem with science, i view it as a handy tool to find the true nature of the universe. Science tells me that there are laws in nature, laws of attraction and replusion, laws of motion, laws of gravity and many many others. We are told that if any of these laws had any different values than the ones they have that galaxies, stars, planets and even matter would not have formed. All of nature exists in harmony from the smallest quark to entire universe itself and if you can't see the intelligent design in it your faith in chance is much bigger than mine is in God. The video says they can form RNA in the lab and can coax a reaction from it with iron. But they then tell you that RNA can't even live without DNA to give it instructions. When you consider the incredibly large amount of information stored in even the smallest forms of DNA, how can you believe hundreds of thousands of molecules, consisting of trillions and trillions of atoms, all came together at one instant of time by chance and in just the right order? Again, your faith has to be stronger than mine, scientifically speaking.

@edmorel134

6 жыл бұрын

To sum up the video: Science doesnt know how life began. Athiests have my permission to shit themselves.

@AvatarEnd777

5 жыл бұрын

We are not shitting our pants. Just calling out bullshit as is our right and our responsibility. :)

@b.jamminmusic3885

5 жыл бұрын

We do know, or we wouldn't make such a fuss

Hell yes to this video!! The issue could be explored in more depth with hot vs cold beginning, anaerobic environment, clay matrix, the RNA world etc. but it's perfect for the intended audience. My hat off to you sir.

This is so informative brUh, thanks

Excellent video. I’m going to use it in my biology class.

@dave1370

2 жыл бұрын

That's pretty sad. You're a teacher, and you're showing this massive speculation as science?

@salvadoralvarado8685

2 жыл бұрын

@@dave1370 I’m going to teach that humans and chimps share more than 95% of their DNA, show me that this is a “massive” speculation

@mcmanustony

Жыл бұрын

@@dave1370 it’s science. The full answer isn’t known and no one claims it is. Throwing your imaginary friends into the equation explains precisely nothing

Excellent as always. Should have a follow-up showing the progression of prokaryotes to eukaryotes possibly via endosymbiosis. Mitochondria from heterotrophic prokaryotes and chloroplasts from autotrophic prokaryotes.

@mark41776

10 жыл бұрын

So those two created the eukaryote?

@martynjones8560

10 жыл бұрын

Marcus Moody It has been observed that larger prokaryotes engulf smaller unicells and instead of "digesting" them, use them for other metabolic functions. The same with plastids or small cyanobacteria. This endosymbiosis is thought to be the start of early eukaryotes. There's a lot of geological time involved here and not enough space to detail the rise of endoplastistic reticullem, ribosomes, various vesicles etc. - Find a university level text-book to argue against (Campbell's "Biology" would be my choice). There are many gradual steps on the emergence of 'true cells', but we have very good evidence of how prokaryotes became the cells that all multicellular life arose from.

@mark41776

10 жыл бұрын

Martyn Jones I know that they would engulf mitochondria, but an entire class of cell entirely? Interesting.

@martynjones8560

10 жыл бұрын

Marcus Moody They weren't mitochondria at that stage, just an engulfed smaller prokaryote that eventually served an energy process within the cell. Similar were indentations of the cellular membrane to give rise to other organelles, also initially redundant, but eventually useful.

this channel needs more subs

Well done. Thanks for sharing

Great vid, visuals and a content of the vid on its own, I'll check out your profile. Man I would love to witness a creation of. The scientific theory that is proven where life come from.

Just a question crossed on my mind. I know that life could emerge from non-living material. And I know that free will is an illusion because my decision is based on the chemical reactions happening inside my brain. But can anybody please explain to me how can life have consciousness? Where do our mind reside? How can I experience and perceive the world as it is? I don't know if other life form beside me have consciousness at all, but can science at some point explain this to me? I'm really curious about it.

@freeyourmind7538

3 жыл бұрын

Damn! Probably the most interesting comment and nobody commented back. You sir/madaam/chemicals/meaningless being/ have legit questions that actually need answering.

@vivusen6547

2 жыл бұрын

Advaita Vedanta 😪

@Alphafoxx1

2 жыл бұрын

How can life come from material that’s not alive

@Alphafoxx1

2 жыл бұрын

How does organization come from chaos

@Alphafoxx1

2 жыл бұрын

How does the earth we live on have everything it needs to support life

wow. i really need to study biology and chemistry because of this curious topic

Very nicely done.

@kingspamaccount

5 жыл бұрын

If you want some real science and not pretty pictures, watch this. kzread.info/dash/bejne/ka6FusmDXce-fZc.html

Well done video. Very clear and informative. Many thanks. From Tampa, Florida.

This is awesome, I'm learning fantastic thanks to your videos, sharing them around too!

@MrGreen-fi5sg

9 ай бұрын

No! Follow Christ!

@FlandiddlyandersFRS

2 ай бұрын

​@@MrGreen-fi5sg Jesus is a fictional character.

@MrGreen-fi5sg

2 ай бұрын

@@FlandiddlyandersFRS How. Their is literally historical records of him. You people really have no argument. 😒

@FlandiddlyandersFRS

2 ай бұрын

@@MrGreen-fi5sg 😄 Lots of claims. But claims are not "historical records". You failed.

@MrGreen-fi5sg

2 ай бұрын

@@FlandiddlyandersFRS If it's recorded then YES it's historical. That's what historical literally means. 😒 I failed nothing for we are close to the end times!

I think this was a very well made video. I do think you should put links to the experiments and papers you've sited! You may have excited people's interest in this topic. You should give them credible resources to explore it on their own.

This video rocks!

Great video. I thought they would first define what they mean by life, and probably existence and death as well.

My 7-year-old said, "play it again."

@leekenyon8705

3 жыл бұрын

The first life is still a big ? to scientist all the theories having to many weaknesses and flaws and now to work on the math of creating life from randomly throwing inorganic materials together and now for alternates created by crazy people 1 We have fanatics' that believe a large impact on mars accrued around 4 billion years ago and that a fragment of mars landed on the earth during this period and began life on the earth 2 Origins of life on earth began after the evacuation of the intellect life from mars who stopped by the earth on their way out of the solar system and then pulled down their pants and took a large dump beginning life on the earth thus we are forever known as the living turd planet.

As an example lets say creating life requires you to throw 1000 dice and they all have to land on a six. Pretty small chance of it happening right? But what if we are allowed to throw multiple times? What if we can try a 1000 times, or a million or a trillion times? We do not even know the true extent of existence, so how can you say the chance too small for it to happen if we do not even know how often you can try? Also keep in mind that failure means there is no observer to even note the failure, since the observer is the product of life itself.

@sabin97

8 жыл бұрын

+CPTANT also it;s not that you need a whole strand of dna to form in a single step. the smaller components have an affinity for one another. and the even smaller components also do. so you start off with very simple small molecules. and they slowly group together, and form more complex structures, until you end up with something that resembles dna...

@cptant7610

8 жыл бұрын

DNAunion Yes you are right about those odds with these particular numbers, however every chance approaches 1 as the number of attempts approaches infinity. Hell, perhaps the universe did throw 10^770 times or more. Even if that were true we wouldn't know of all the failures since we are a product of the occurrence itself. This is an extreme case aproach, I can't quantify the odds of life originating on a planet. It is meant to show that even events with the tiniest of odds will happen if we throw often enough.

@HireDeLune

8 жыл бұрын

+DNAunion What if you considered all events and all places possible- surely the chance of life approaches 100%?

@HireDeLune

8 жыл бұрын

DNAunion I'm not making a claim, simply asking a question.

@HireDeLune

8 жыл бұрын

DNAunion Considering the universe is vast, infinite maybe, wouldn't the chances of a suitable place for life approach infinite too? Even with a small chance of life, an infinite amount of planets should negate the small chance of life forming, wouldn't it? I heard somewhere that if the universe was vast enough there would be an exact copy of you. Simply because the probability approached 100% as the size and amount of matter in the universe approached infinite.

Tnq for explaining brother 🔥🔥

Geez you get some big time sponsors. I’ve seen on other videos that you have a lot of the ones that make PSB NOVA. Good for you. You must be ambitious

Love your vids, they are really simple and easy to understand

@funkymonkey1958

2 жыл бұрын

My man could only get 7 likes in 7 years

The major take away here is when you have energy being pushed into a chemical system, that system will tend to greater complexity over time. On Earth, the energy source is the sun and the heat of the earth itself.

@carrisglen123

10 жыл бұрын

energy randomly distributed will destroy unless it has a receiver

@DonaldKronos

10 жыл бұрын

sammy strain What? How in the world would you expect energy to destroy anything without being received?

@carrisglen123

10 жыл бұрын

Donald Kronos it needs a mechanism to utilise the energy or the mass release of energy will only be destructive . The recipient needs to be in place before the energy is released

@DonaldKronos

10 жыл бұрын

sammy strain Absolutely not true. Just because humans have learned to take advantage of the ability to arrange things to behave in ways that we can predict, does not mean that nature needs to behave like we do in order to do anything non-destructive. You're jumping to a false conclusion. Not bad for an understanding of macroscopic mechanics as utilized by humans, but not an accurate overall picture.

@carrisglen123

10 жыл бұрын

Donald Kronos the second law of thermodynamics

Excellent!! Subbing now.

It would be a productive line of research to actually investigate if life has originated from a single source, or if life began in different environments on earth.

@39401JLB

8 ай бұрын

Unfortunately, the evidence seems to indicate that life arose very quickly -- early in the geological history of Earth. That was a very, very long time ago, and much of what happened then is absolutely lost forever; even many of the rocks are gone or inaccessible.

Why have you uploaded the same video with a different title?

@psyekl

3 жыл бұрын

please post a link to the other video.

+stated clearly can you post a video describing the life cycle of butterfly and explain each stage in evolutionary perspective?

@StatedClearly

8 жыл бұрын

That's not on our current list of projects but it is a good idea for an article at least. I'll see if one of my entomologist friends would have time to do a breakdown of the evolution of metamorphosis.

@ONFIREYO

8 жыл бұрын

+Stated Clearly you should explain how the caterpillar knows how and when to build a cocoon and stay in it for a certain amount of time without ever being instructed how to do so? "the memories came in it's DNA from its parents" then why don't we get memories passed to us from our parents? and why would its ancestors ever start making cocoons? or how do birds know where to go when they migrate? how were flowers pollinated before bees existed? how did snakes spiders and other organisms that use venom randomly develop it? how does an animal randomly start producing deadly acid that it then knows how to use?

@RajSeelam

8 жыл бұрын

+Arthur Oberemok (somebodyepik) we have memories passed on to us. drop a baby in the water for example. How dose it know to hold it's breath in water. There are many more like that if u do some research.

@hisham031170

8 жыл бұрын

***** So what, are we once upon a time aquatic apes or something?

@martinlag1

8 жыл бұрын

+Arthur Oberemok (somebodyepik) Butterfly metamorphosis is quite well studied and understood. The cells that become wings are not fully activated until the penultimate instar (chrysalis), similar to a human chin not growing a beard until nearly two decades of life, (and never in females). Metamorphosis is explained by delayed timing of gene expression especially in climates with marked seasonal changes. There is little qualitative difference in metamorphosis and the complex mechanisms of development in embryology.

Thank you for explaining sir

I'm rewatching this after many years since I am now taking a course on Energy and Evolution at university. After restlessly digging through the literature, I'd conclude that we will never really know for sure what the origin of life was, but I believe that we're pretty good at coming up with ideas and testing them, and that we already have quite a good idea of how it may have been, regardless of the fact that there are different schools of thought.

@Glocky131

3 жыл бұрын

Holy shit, that is some really groundbreaking stuff.

@massey904

3 жыл бұрын

Stubborn people don't really want to know the origin of life.

@SiSCrafting

3 жыл бұрын

There is an explanation of the origin of life. Some just choose not to accept it. What I don’t understand is if evolution is true, why are humans still humans?

@debildebilov7504

3 жыл бұрын

@@SiSCrafting You do realize that evolution is slow and gradual process right ? right now there is no evolutionary pressure for our species to change, although small changes do occur people before weren't able to digest milk but now most people can digest it , and that is all of the result of random mutations, when creatures reproduce they don't make a perfect copy of themselves something always is changed

@studygodsword5937

3 жыл бұрын

@@debildebilov7504 evolution is an impossible process, with numerous obstacles it cannot cross !

I love these videos. Though in this one- the sound added alongside the dolphin is a kookaburra bird. The sound was used in the tv series and movie Flipper- and is commonly associated, incorrectly, with dolphins.

@ThisIsWEB

2 жыл бұрын

This could be the most important thing I have ever learned

Watching this video should be mandatory if you are alive right now. I find stuff like this awesome. Every day we get closer to answering those questions about the universe and how life began. Science will someday provide us with all the answers that are out there.

First word you don’t know , but more are less you don’t believe, That’s that truth

Nice information

That alien life form shown on the end of the video bears some striking resemblance with the Tardigrade, which is in fact an amazingly long lived creature - surviving all the past mass extinctions and can in fact survive time in space. He is a cute little thing too. :) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tardigrade

The meaning of life is very simple. It's 42.

@27NGM

5 жыл бұрын

it is for to end

@javieraguirre9135

4 жыл бұрын

That was not the question

Nice and succinct.

thank you.

What an awesome voice!

It's quite a thought, that one single moment in which the first self-replicating molecule assembled, gave rise to everything you see before you. The device you watch this video on, the book on your table, and you yourself, it was all set into motion in that instant.

@Al-Hussainy

4 ай бұрын

You people are foolish

@Stated Clearly, that is an amazing video (as always) but it has been 7 years since you uploaded it, would you mind doing another video explaining the origin of life in more depth and include the work of Jeremy England about life being an inevitable consequence of thermodynamics. There aren't many videos on the internet touching that subject.

@berkaygazikara

2 жыл бұрын

@@funquay2219 couldn't find the video buddy

I love your video

Everything is chemistry. that makes me think mushrooms hold more answers then we know. Since it just alters our chemistry

@andycopeland7051

3 жыл бұрын

Yeahhhh magic mushrooooooms maaaannn

Human: how did life started? *doing research to find out how* Alien/higher being: look at these chunks of atoms trying to understand how it came to be. Pathetic, complex chunks of atoms trying to understand itself, hysterical.smh

@vee9066

4 жыл бұрын

Lol.

@alexy.9306

4 жыл бұрын

They speak English?

@BigHeretic

4 жыл бұрын

*cellphone bwahahaha* Hilarious! look at that chunk of atoms trying to assert how it came to be and how it didn't come to be.

@callumosullivan7546

4 жыл бұрын

I thought that but how did the aliens come to be

@Normalguy21

3 жыл бұрын

Why aliens always think about us not about themself that how the hell the came into existence.

اشكرك لأنك ترجمت هاذه

My cat loves your videos!

I watch this channel with my five year old. She LOVES it. Keep up the excellent work.

@Wolfhammered

5 жыл бұрын

BarbarosaAlexander Indoctrination starts young.

@chikkipop

Жыл бұрын

@@Wolfhammered Warning: Idiot on the scene

@airfun5001

22 күн бұрын

@@Wolfhammeredthat would be religion, this is education

You answered the question at 0:18.

@lukeabs9333

4 жыл бұрын

true

@choeungul

3 жыл бұрын

@@lukeabs9333 Yes, sir

@carlboi5652

3 жыл бұрын

And it will never exist because the idea that non-living, non-conscience atom molecules managed to form living cells and DNA, and somehow these cells managed to change the DNA to evolve into complex conscious multicellular organism like humans is just so unthinkable

@yeahkeen2905

3 жыл бұрын

Great Value Bleach we have observed rna molecules spontaneously forming on their own, we have observed lipids spontaneously forming on their own as well as forming lipid membranes, and we have observed amino acids forming on their own. The only people who think it’s unthinkable are ignorant people.

@heath6969

3 жыл бұрын

@@carlboi5652 your vision is so narrow so of course someone like you would never be able to think it

Satisfied!

I like that it was stated very early in the video that we don't currently know but are trying to figure it out. I don't like it when I have to watch the whole video and then it says, so to answer the question in the title, we don't know.

TLDR: Can science explain the origin of life? Not yet.

@MrMollusk7

8 жыл бұрын

+lokustic en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RNA_world

@dontask8998

8 жыл бұрын

Nope, but that's no reason to stop trying

@sbellaharris

8 жыл бұрын

+lokustic No. Of course that science/reality always need more and more evidence, except those ridiculous religious fairy tales.

@edwinmyrick4571

8 жыл бұрын

+GG2K7AU05 give me one peice of evidence AGAINST creation Side note not for evolution but against creation

@sbellaharris

8 жыл бұрын

edwin myrick give me one piece of evidence against my claim that you have been killing people & making them look like accidents(e.g car crash, avalanche, earth quake, etc) with your supernatural power.

3:47 *"I made pee without peeing!"* 😂😂😂😂😂

9 years later and the more science reveals the complexity of a living cell the more confounding the question becomes...darwin would have straight up thrown his random luck scenario of life into the trash bin 150 years ago had he partially comprehended the sheer complexity of the simplest living sysyem..

A bag of chemicals experiencing itself, studying itself and growing. This chemical bag has desires, it explores art, speaks about heart, entertains itself with stories. Amazing. 😉

@toyosioyejobi309

3 жыл бұрын

😭😭😅😂

@Mark-Wilson

2 жыл бұрын

@@toyosioyejobi309 laughing at your own ignorance?

@toyosioyejobi309

2 жыл бұрын

@@Mark-Wilson No at you!

@Mark-Wilson

2 жыл бұрын

@@toyosioyejobi309 cus of your ignorance?

@toyosioyejobi309

2 жыл бұрын

@@Mark-Wilson.

Nursed by warm sunbeams in primeval caves, organic life began beneath the waves, hence, without parent by spontaneous birth rise the first specks of animated earth.

@helicase2

8 жыл бұрын

+Simon Ring as with most who must explain origins in a materialistic and natural way, you begin in the middle with both feet planted in mid air. You glibly assume the warm sunbeams and primeval caves, the waves and even the earth as given but offer no rational explanation for their origin.

@sjring7331

8 жыл бұрын

Poly Merase ????? It's just part of a poem by Erasmus Darwin, I thought was rather nice. It's not even supposed to be an actual explanation or argument.

@MrPlanx

8 жыл бұрын

+Poly Merase As opposed to religions that begin with an invisible deity who can create trillions of stars by magic, yet somehow his existence revolves around whether his amoeba-like creatures believe in him or not. You can't get any more hypocritical than that - or any more fucking stupid.

@FinflazodeTurroai

8 жыл бұрын

+MrPlanx WHA ?.

@MrPlanx

8 жыл бұрын

***** That's not even a word. Try again and use a full sentence.

This is really helpful.. especially for those who are interested, as I am in developing more scientific literacy among people who do not formally study science. Thanks

Terrific

Can someone please explain the topic of how a single cell got life,from all the way back to big bang theory,no one taught me this and I was so curious to know,please do reply

@akoskormendi9711

5 жыл бұрын

I'll do a oversimplified version because the topic itself is quite complicated, the processes and why they happened. After the universe started to expand from the energy came to be elementary particles which formed together into the simplest atoms, hydrogen and helium. These were pulled together by gravity and under high pressure started to fuse into heavier elements, forming the first stars. Then these exploded in supernovas and got their content out which formed into the planets we know today, again, through gravity. Our Planet formed, the Earth and for a while was bombarded with asterioids, carrying over water and other elements that are required for life. It's also possible there were already organic molecules in the asteroids or even very simple life forms, these parts are hazy. But basically life probably kickstarted through chemical processes, some of which you can see in the video. If you want more detail I'd highly suggest looking it up, as I might've been inaccurate or pretty wrong on some parts, but that's basically how it went down.

Thank you it helped me with a project and made learning about life so much simpler!

@atikurpranto3190

2 жыл бұрын

Read quran

@Rryan8065

2 жыл бұрын

@@atikurpranto3190 No it’s fake.

@atikurpranto3190

2 жыл бұрын

@@Rryan8065 u can read my brother

Flat earthers live all across the globe.

@kinglyzard

6 жыл бұрын

Flat Earthers from the four corners of the globe all agree the world is SQUARE

@carcinogenicthalidomide3057

5 жыл бұрын

It's actually a toroid.

@TeiStacja

5 жыл бұрын

To believe that life self-assembled itself = belief in flat earth

@cameronscott9248

5 жыл бұрын

say that again, but slowly......

@notallopinionswerecreatede4465

4 жыл бұрын

@Mike Bready Any chemist would argue otherwise; I'd rather take the word of an expert, than that of a crazy nutjob that denies reality to get attention.

MR. FARINA! Hello fellow Professor Dave fans 🖐🏼

(( indeed we have created them from what they know )) old book , great vedio BTW .

Riiiiight. Some dude recreates pee 200 years ago and starts a scientific revolution. I mean you couldn’t make that shit up could you (pardon the pun) 😂

@StatedClearly

6 жыл бұрын

Truth is stranger than fiction.

@BlacksmithTWD

5 жыл бұрын

@Winston Grettum Why assume he didn't?

@edit8826

4 жыл бұрын

BlacksmithTWD -because this video doesn’t comport to his bible magic worldview...

@stephenmcguire7342

4 жыл бұрын

@@edit8826 but is does conform with your science fiction world view, right? Well there you go your emotions say it's true therefore it must be so, right? Hope you enjoyed the cartoon.

@stephenmcguire7342

4 жыл бұрын

@@edit8826 Worshipping ones Creator is not a waste of one's life. Worshipping the false gods of science fiction, which you do, and being a proud member of the Church of Scientism, which you are, that qualifies! And I'll remain angry at the lies of modern science as long as I wish, without apology!

Question on my friends test: Explain how planets are formed or create: "God made it"

@atheist535

5 жыл бұрын

@jia khan What made god and where is this magically enchanted beast?

How is self-assembly possible? Specially the cell membrane?

@hammalammadingdong6244

4 жыл бұрын

Nltvp - bubbles self- assemble. It’s just chemistry.

I want to share this VDO to my students. Is it possible to add subtitles in my own language.

The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you

@dizzychineseman7445

5 жыл бұрын

@sbmphr i know

@TheMaggsy1

5 жыл бұрын

the universe is not a person,so you want me to believe something that doesn't make sense to me,that is called faith.

@TheHomelessDreamer

4 жыл бұрын

@sbmphr Be sure to attribute that quote to Neil deGrasse Tyson, something the original poster forgot to do.

@brokencookie1

8 ай бұрын

The universe owes nothing to anybody

I'm currently in college and at this point I feel like I have learned quite a bit about cell biology in classes, and also just form some personal studying. I am going to be honest and say that it just seems more and more unlikely to me that life could have possibly formed at random by non-life. The more I learn about the inner-workings of cells, even the simplest of them, the harder it is to think that they could have just formed on accident. There are many, and I mean MANY, systems and basic processes that cells have that need to be in place in order for them to work, many of which are interdependent on one another. It is truly mind boggling to see how chemistry and physics work so perfectly together to allow cells to preform the processes they need to do in order to function. I feel like this video, and many other presentations like it, really over simplify how extremely difficult it is to build even simple cells, especially at random. The video mentions how basic amino acids, basic sugars and a few other molecules used in cells have been proven to form outside of life, but if you study cells deeper you can see that they are much more complex than just a bunch of these basic components put together (NOT that this video makes that claim, but I think it is only fair to point that out for people who might not know that). I guess, the point I'm getting at here is that even basic cells are extremely intricate in design, and how simple this video seems to put the origin of life just doesn't sell the idea for me. I urge everyone to read more about the inner-workings of cells elsewhere online (I say this because youtube videos are often too short and over-simplified, which is fine for its platform, however it just doesn't do much justice for this topic). From my personal experience of studying the issue it just seems almost impossible that abiogenesis could ever occur, even in very controlled conditions. Sorry for any poor grammar I know I'm clearly not an English major, but I just wanted to state my opinion. I am not trying to start a heated debate I just felt compelled try to show people that there is a much bigger picture to paint here than how this video states it.

@eepyru

Жыл бұрын

I'm a theist, and I love studying science, and this is exactly how I feel. There is so much order, even in the most basic cells. It's like every organalle inside a cell has a purpose and it's playing its role, and whatever it does is useful to the other components of a cell in some way or the other. Without any one of the components, a cell wouldn't function. It's the order that gets me, and we know from science as well as our common sense, that order requires intelligence. Randomness and chance does not produce order and purpose. Intelligence is a great requirement, something which many people don't realise. Anyways, it's nice to see that someone else sees it the same way that I do.

@homeschooler6661

Жыл бұрын

I've been scrolling thru the comments hoping to find one like yours. Its a pity it took so long. I wish everyone would do as you recommend. Billions of years doesn't actually aid the cause of abiogenesis. In reality it probably makes it worse. I don't see what's so threatening about considering the role of a higher intelligence. It's really the only thing that makes sense.

my teacher loves you

I'm still lost how do we get order from disorder? so much so that we can study...these maters

I just got here because my teacher told me to make a reaction paper about this so☹

@franzliszt8957

3 жыл бұрын

Who cares?

@IronFreee

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, understanding where we come from and learning things is so overrated... Who needs it when they when you can be a flathearther creationist or a stripper?

Great video - does a good job of addressing what hasn't been explained yet as well as what we do know. The nature of science is just as important as the science itself - I'm showing this to my 10th grade biology class.

YES YES YES!!!!!! THE FUTURE IS NOW THANKS TO SCIENCE

we are limited for a reason, therefore theories are here for us.