I love my Ranger :) I think it's extremely underrated.

@michaelcano1591

Жыл бұрын

Right there with u. Love my Ranger.

@TheMutchlerchad

11 ай бұрын

Same here!

@ramozj6997

11 ай бұрын

Mate all that matters is that you love . Enjoy it

@emilnim710

10 ай бұрын

How can you say the ranger is underrated? I haven't seen one negative review and everyone says how great the whole watch in terms of value. I like the ranger but it is not underrated.

@KamilOlaf

9 ай бұрын

@emilnim710 It's basically because most of people say it's too plain, it hasn't got applied markers, it is too simple etc... while the main charm of the Ranger is how it sits on your wrist

They’ve got the Ranger totally wrong. It’s the best field watch on the Market. If you know, you know!

I don't understand the hate for the Ranger. Tudor did a great job with making it close to the original but adding subtle touches to it. I had a Pelagos 39 come into my AD, and I almost bought it, until I saw the Ranger in person. The Pelagos was to similar to my sub while the Ranger was much more stunning in person. I ended up with Ranger and couldn't be happier.

@vianouche1

Жыл бұрын

Where do you see "hate"?

@iornhawk321

Жыл бұрын

@vianouche1 did you watch the video....they didn't want to even place the Ranger in a category and stated that is was a boys' watch made for Boy Scouts.

@vianouche1

Жыл бұрын

@@iornhawk321 is that "hate"? No. It is their opinion and it is argumented and many people think so. Hate would be to just call it shit without reason. Try to take less offense when people have different opinions than yours...

@iornhawk321

Жыл бұрын

@@vianouche1 I'm not taking offense to anything. I'm simply stating my OPINION on their take of the Ranger.

@desireless4092

Жыл бұрын

@@vianouche1 ok his Pelagos take was shit. Also I find it hilarious when he started talking about masculinity. Of course this is my opinion.

I like the Ranger and I wouldn’t feel like a kid wearing it, especially not at 42yo. The BB36 is more expensive than the Ranger (where I live at least), but the BB36 doesn’t have the MT5402 movement nor the T-Fit bracelet and the brush satin finish. I don’t need, nor I’d buy, a €4k watch if I get all of this with the Ranger. the design of the dial is simple and highly legible. The Ranger will be my first luxury watch. Andrew won’t change my mind. Much love to the AET team ! Edit: I collected my Tudor Ranger on March 25th. Absolutely love it !

@davidr2802

Жыл бұрын

the BB36 is wayyyyyy overpriced.

Sorry... I quite like the Ranger. I think it's overpriced given its simplicity, but I quite like it. It isn't on my list because I don't have pointlessly disposable income, but if I did, like a Lottery win, I think I'd buy it.

Come on guys, the Ranger was clearly under-rated! It has been a very divisive watch from the get-go upon release; with many bashing the plain looks, negative dial space, size of the numerals etc. It is watch that seems to be in a 'see in person before final judgement' category for further appreciation. I also think the Nato is a must on this one and helps provide a lot more character for the piece!

As a proud owner of an FXD, I didn't find anything appealing about the std Pelagos - too chunky, didn't like the blue version coloring, but I fell in love with the niche-ness of the FXD that makes it feel unique and special and it gets 90% of my wrist time now. It feels like a true tool watch and wears casually really well, definitely way more wearable than the original, I only reach for the OP41 when I dress up a bit. Have thought of replacing it with a Pelagos39, but it doesn't feel as special.

@K.J.H_

Жыл бұрын

Replacing the OP with a peli39 for formal occasions? I figure the 39 would dress up well but not sure about a full suit.

@alfieakaronaldog

Жыл бұрын

Do not see how the P39 replaces an OP41 (Same lug width though and P39 is almost P40) but I would say P39 feels more special (depending on what colour OP you have maybe) 😍 FXD is my favourite Tudor though, and very special if an MN21. Tudor said only 150 were sold in U.K. and they have 180 dealers. FXD blue is way nicer than standard Pelagos blue for sure, but standard Pelagos blue is a bit of a classic and more wearable on a bracelet l feel.

@mohammadfaris2270

Жыл бұрын

As a proud owner of an FXD, those reading this comment and wishing your AD offers you one, I was once there reading comments like this 😢 stay strong and press on!

@desireless4092

11 ай бұрын

I own both. Black Pelagos 42 an the FXD and I disagree with you

Also in what universe is the Ranger hyped. It’s almost universally criticized. Usually by people who have only seen it in pictures.

Andrew seems to be mainly focused on the size of the bezel, dial, and snowflake hand, while Adrian is an issue with the difference in color between them. For my wrist size of around 7.3 inches, I think the P42 looks just right - the P39, on the other hand, feels a bit too small to me personally. As for the color difference, my eyes aren't discerning enough to pick up on it, so I'm lucky in that regard! To me, its the perfect watch, at least for today! Thanks for sharing gents!

I’m a big guy and I lift a lot , so my 42mm Pelagius suits me. And I love it I tried the 39 recently and it’s way too small. And I love the blockiness.. it makes it so legible and purposeful. Also the in polished look let’s you wear it with anything , tracksuit to a suit.

I went out the other night to buy a White dial 300 but ended up with the Ranger, I just loved the simplicity of it. It was much better in person than seeing pictures of it.

Agree with Adrian. The black bay is too much a sub mariner. Palagos marine national fxd is the ultimate tool watch in my opinion. JLC for dress and finesse. Of course all very personal 😂

Here’s what’s so frustrating about this take- we fall in love with watches because of the experiences we share with those watches. Your example of seeing a big fat watch on a grown man’s wrist- how do you know it wasn’t a gift from a loved one. For the grown men that bought and made memories with the black bay heritage- it’s not all about “upgrading” to the 58 for a smaller size on the wrist. Tool watches are supposed to be with you for decades- it’s inevitable that the brand will come out with a slimmer version. This is absolutely the wrong take from an influencer.

@davidr2802

Жыл бұрын

"this is absolutely the wrong take from an influencer." I think he is talking about you. A supposed adult who needs to be influenced and his biases reaffirmed by a complete stranger. That's weak sauce man. Grow up

@kevinfernandez8416

Жыл бұрын

@@davidr2802 ? I’m not following.

Imagine making a living reviewing watches and then having nothing to say about them.

I dig the ranger

The blockiness of the Peligos reflects that it is a real diver watch duh!

I love my Blue Pelagos. The size fits my preference well, it’s watch that looks like it means business. Adrian did the best video on the Pelagos.

@biggiebeil5118

Жыл бұрын

Yea nvm this guy saying absloute non sense!

Interesting where Adrian says the BB58 is the Tudor answer to the Submariner. When the Pelagos 39mm came out I thought from a looks standpoint if you cannot get a Submariner, the Pelagos 39mm was the answer.

Pelagos 42 is the bees knees

I mean at the end of the day watches are all about preferences, some like bigger others smaller, some prefer heritage others not so much, you also have to factor people’s budget. I personally don’t think the Ranger is overrated as it’s not in such high demand like the BB58 or the Pelagos, something popular can be said to be overrated, at least that how I see it. If you don’t like something that’s fine, and if you think something is a bad product sure as long as it’s followed with arguments, such as bad movement, low quality materials, over priced, etc. other than that it just falls into likes and dislikes.

Opinions are pretty common. Disagree on the ranger. It’s a nice basic watch (prefer the 41 cause I’m super manly and have a 7.5 in wrist).

@NeoWahNah

Жыл бұрын

LOL!

@Signal11th

11 ай бұрын

I bought a Ranger and I have a 9 inch wrist, I went out to buy another watch saw it asked for it to try it on, tried the white dial/green dial Omega divers a Pelagos 42 (black) and the ranger, the Omegas were pretty watches the Pelagos I really nearly bought but in the end it was the Ranger "boring" (I prefer to say simple) design that won it for me, I actually was quite disappointed with the Omega's after wanting another one for so long they were nice but at 5.5k just felt there wasn't enough coming from that watch. Also I don't get the love for the green dial when I saw it in person I was thinking "humm ok it's ok but compared to the white dial it looks pretty naff to be honest" Obviously just personal opinions everyone is different.

Please, for the love of god... for the future AET podcast intro, get Andrew to yell "Hey Adrian!!!" with a Sylvester Stallone voice-over in the crowd during the Watches and Wonders.

Kinda weird to talk about the aesthetics of a professional dive watch that is obviously built with purpose in mind. Also very weird to judge the wearer vs the watch and compare the 39mm to the 42mm when one is essentially a rebranded BB58 and the other has a legit Helium GEV. My only qualm on the Pelagos is the QC on the bezel, which is an incredible 60 click titanium bezel when the lume stays in place.

@desireless4092

Жыл бұрын

It's stays on place. If you have issues they will put on the newer bezel with the more thinned font, like my current Pelagos.

How is Pelagos not manly 😂😂😂 if there is one watch to be worn by Batman, it’s the pelagos lhd.

The Ranger is is essentially just a black bay 58 without the bezel...

Let me be Chairman here: Andrew loves intricate and delicate watches, like a skeleton for example. He isn't going to like "An" (or perhaps "The") ultimate tool watch. The Pelagos is pure purpose. Understatement with mat finishing, because of it's tool nature. Now the Ranger. I struggle to support that, but the P01, is a beautiful cool watch with a story to die for. And a great narrative always makes a great watch?!? Discuss?

The Blue Pelagos has a mesmerising design appeal to me, it reminds me of an ink well in an industrial design inspired from an Isaac Asimov type world... but the case thickness , the width and thickness of the bracelet and the sharp edges of the clasp put the wearer in constant conflict between design and ergonomics like a dinking bird drinking beautiful design and then swaying back from how it wears on the wrist..still the design ,that blue against the cold flat grey titanium makes it irresistible and I would regret not keeping mine , no doubt! ..and it's more in line with the Sea Dweller than the submariner. Thank you for a cool video gentlemen.

They should sell the Ranger with a knapsack, plastic compass, fake binoculars, and kid camper shorts. I wholeheartedly concur, Andrew. Someone needed to say it.

@richardwarren2024

Жыл бұрын

Haha. Dora the Explorer watch?

@warrbandit6295

Жыл бұрын

Should they sell the snoopy omega with a kids blanket and a sippy cup?

Well said Adrian

To Tudor or not to Tudor…. It’s not nobler to Ranger or Pelagos, but to Explorer or Submariner… you’re so right Andrew. 😎 But it remains personal opinion of course…

P01 owner here. Picked it over all the watches in discussion here :)

I love the look and especially the color of the Pelagos, but now that all the watch companies are completely turning their backs on the so called “big watch craze” and churning out all these sub 40mm watches without having a larger model, the watch dorks that happen to be on the bigger end of the body scale just have to smile and move along at all the cool watches that look ladylike on our wrists. When Adrian suggested to Tudor to bring out a 42mm Pelagos, I sat up straight.

@mattperry5789

Жыл бұрын

I agree. If you have a big wrist, a 42 isn’t a “big watch” it’s just simply the right size. I love the aesthetic of the Pelagos 39, here’s to hoping they update the 42mm version for guys with bigger wrists

Love every episode, but must admit I disagree entirely about the Ranger. The simplicity of it with the flat dial and minimal text is perfect to me. I love the Explorer too, but I don't think liking the aesthetic of one precludes enjoying the other.

Imho, the Pelagos, like every diver, is a watch for leisure time, never wear it with a suit.. 1:50 ❤ your content! AEF rocks! Greetings from Germany

I agree with all comments, Pelagos is ridiculous with a suit but I work at sea and wear one professionally and the 'huge' size really fits in the industrial maritime sector. I do get a sense of relief when I finish work and take the watch off after 4 months away. I don't generally wear it at home.

@AboutEffingTime

Жыл бұрын

🙌

Well I for one am not a one watch guy. I have days when I feel mature and want something small, understated, and days when I’m out for action and want a brute. So the first guy who opined should think in terms of moods and situations and not just what that one piece might convey in absolute terms. But I get his example of a guy in a suit with a chunky diver. I see plenty of those in the office. They are juvenile at least in their watch journeys, because they could not leave the Panerai at home and wear a freaking dress watch, or at least a sports one that fits under a cuff.

Strange you didn't discuss the fine line between refinement, finesse and boring, I once reached the stage that I hated the divers look that's either a submariner or a Seiko that when the Pelagos came to break that mold and at a reasonable price.

Ranger, Pelagos….great watches, more underrated !! Please ask an expert like Adrian ;)

Well done, I agree ❤

My blue Pelagos 💙 is still my favourite go to watch. And I have Explorer etc Depends on your style and your wrist size surely. The point made is completely moot. Who wears a blue Pelagos with a suit!!!??? Mine gets worn on the rubber strap with tshirts and hoodies in the spring/summer. It's a sports watch at end of day and an amazing one at that. Surely everyone has a dress watch for suits, if not have a word with yourself and get shopping 😄

I love Tudor but the recent ones have been a bit chunky and the bracelet could do with better end links Bring back the prince! Just imo ✌️

Your spot on Adrian on the Pelagos

It’s definitely underrated. It’s the black bay that’s overrated.

I can’t help but think the hour hand on the Ranger looks like a man’s organ🙈 FXD is my favorite at the moment.

Agree with Andrew here, they are toyish watches. If you’re gonna go for a Tudor, the black bay 54 is a masterpiece and all you will ever need. A timeless all timer IMO.

What do I do with a 9" wrist? I am keen on the Tag superdiver as I like its garish looks. It's obnoxious and not pretty 🤣. Porb fit my wrist too! A show on the fat boy wrist watches would be fun (42 dia +). Just don't include TW steel....blahh.

The Ranger has “child-like dimensions”? What alternative reality is the Ozzie guy living in? I know it’s an opinion but that perception is WILD.

Andrews argument is so stupid. Who says the Submariner design is more "refined". Its just subjective. The Pelagos is chunky and blocky cos its a tool watch its fit for purpose. Wearing a dive watch with formal wear is "unrefined" in the first place... its only popular cos of Bond.

The pelagos is good but you would never choose when you see it right next to the black bay

Any watch with a snowflake is a no go with me. It seems awkward and childlike to me a bit the way Andrew (and I for that matter) view block indices. However, that’s the great thing about the hobby. One persons fun and funky is another person’s “never in a 1,000 years” watch.

@marteanderson7963

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for saying that Jeremy. I've never seen the appeal of Tudor; especially for the current price point.

Tudor Royal 41 is most underrated Watch ever !!!

I consider Pelagos as a unique choice and not an alternative. As it have it's own characteristics. Designed for the purpose of diving. Modern diver without sacrificing the tradition of diver watches. Suits professional divers and non snop full-size men.

Some guys have the wrists and hands of a man, some don't.

@NeoWahNah

Жыл бұрын

🤣

The older tudors were more refined and a lot slimmer. Take the aeronaut , 41mm gmt , but only 10.5mm thick. Great bracelet, slim no nonsense clasp with 5 micro adjust holes. And a real rolex feel . The new versions are chunky , with big clasps and thick bracelets and the 39mm are a bit feminine in size for a large man. If you want the best tudors you need to look at their past . I think the fit and finish were better then too. Modern tudors by comparison are a bit cheaply made considering their price point.

Got rid of my Tudor and got into a Speedmaster

I’m sorry but Andrews reasoning is terrible for both watches. We only need to ask why are in to watches in the first place…? Because of that child like desire for something cool that makes you feel good… the sort of styling that Andrew likes is not my taste as I find it a bit to “invicta” with skeleton dials and fake blued metals that only bankers and people who never touch grass would use because of how delicate they are. But he is obviously more flamboyant than someone like me and yes I’d consider myself a honorary captain boring but I enjoy a watch built to be used. And yes we can all argue “I use this that and the other all day and it’s fine…” but we all know if you have something like a pelagos on it will take a hell of a beating and the same with a ranger I have a ranger 79910 and love it as my daily I love the retro field style dial and find it clean and easy to read on the move I have very large wrists so don’t find the large size a problem “it even feels like a smaller Watch would on a smaller wrist” but to say it’s childish is a nonsense like to say anything with Roman numerals is for retirement home candidate’s or digital watches are for people who can’t read analog watches. I think I’m less mad that it was a dig at a watch I own and more that it was such a weak sauce answer from someone I thought was a bit more open minded than that. If however the new Tudor ranger was to have been put in overrated for the reason of how everyone was snatching them up if they wanted them or not just because the hype train had arrived then yes 110% the new ranger would deserve to be there but the pelagos “not 39” as well… Andrew had the only good argument with bezel and dial not being the same blue other than that it’s a tool watch “not a sport watch” it’s made to do a job it just so happens not many people need them or use them for that job anymore. We need to remember tool watches are not sport watches. Anyway after my rant I wouldn’t want Andrew to start ripping his shirt off like he did with Nikko the other night again so all I have to say we might not always agree but keep up the great work been loving about effing time 👌🏻👏🏻✌🏻🕘

@fubarghost13akawoz44

Жыл бұрын

@@thegorn I could but is the art of conversation dying when everyone has to bullet point any sort of reply they make to appease anyone with the attention span of a poorly trained puppy?.

@NeoWahNah

Жыл бұрын

While I don't share his opinion, I respect his right to express it. It's possible that his preference for the P39 over the P42 is due to his smaller wrist size, which makes the latter less comfortable for him. From his perspective, a smaller watch may seem more refined and masculine. That being said, I personally find the P42 to be a great fit for my 7.3" wrist. At the end of the day, watch size and style are subjective, and what matters most is finding what works best for each individual.

@fubarghost13akawoz44

Жыл бұрын

@@NeoWahNah totally agree and yes voice your opinion but the reasoning was not a good one when presented with Andrews IWC in a different episode “not a million miles different to the ranger” he was awestruck he has committed on the Hamilton khaki field before “covered in block numbers” but in a positive way and the point about size it wasn’t that argument at all it was as he put it the childish block numbers if the size was a issue the sea’weed master he just got would be a wall clock on his wrist compared it was just a nonsense comment that I truly don’t think he thought his reasoning through before saying it

@NeoWahNah

Жыл бұрын

@@fubarghost13akawoz44 his reason was sound and made sense to him at the time he shared it, I'm sure! The only difference is it's now on the internet and he will be criticized forever! LOL! You know there is no rhyme or reason in this hobby. It is, what it is. One minute we feel one thing and another it changes. You want a Sub, then don't want a Sub. You think you've found the perfect watch and then its the just whatever. His experience is not your experience, just an opinion that you may or may not want to consider when choosing your next watch. I type this currently wearing my P42 blue. A watch that I've owned for over a year and wore sparingly due to having a collection larger than I need. It is perfect and I love it, at least that's how I feel today!

@fubarghost13akawoz44

Жыл бұрын

@@NeoWahNah I feel the majority of what you say here is very flimflam. Yes we would both feel what we said is correct why else would we say it… but the fact still stands he had nothing held to him to make this argument yet episode’s around that one and only days/ weeks with live’s and he brings up numerous watches with big block numbers that he loves or owns. So it is a nonsense and it’s not like they dropped this show on him this will have had time for him to think. There was as I mentioned and there are still reasons that would make sense “even if we disagree” but this was weak. and considering I’m a anti 2010 and on era hublot person he can make great arguments for things like hublot I have started to think about them a little more “not going to buy one any time soon but…” to say he got me thinking about the brand is well done. But this Tudor argument is “with what we have herd and seen” weak due to his ownership and compliments of very similar watches and watches with exactly those features.

The dial on the Pelagos seems like plastic. I actually went to my AD to purchase it, and when I had it on wrist I just wasn’t that impressed. Now let me say I love Tudor. I own a Black Bay chrono panda and I absolutely freaking love it. So I’m not knocking the brand whatsoever.

I'm not fussed on the ranger, I think it's a little on the boring side and the pelagos is a great watch and a bit of fun, I bought the S&g on leather strap and love it

Don't listen to the watch bros.

TudorPelagos 39 mm case with small wrist size is top, my opinion or bigger Casio “back to future “ are much cool? Everything have is audience’s please there’s lots o “Man with small wrist size “ imagine 42 watch in a 17 mm wrist? Uncool man!

mmm The Ranger is indeed for a very young cub scout that has just joined the pack.

This is hilarious 😂😂. But What else watch nerds will do with extra time off.

Stay off the drink boys, you've totally lost the plot regarding the Ranger.

Agree on the Ranger. Most overrated watch in 2022. Disagree on the Pelagos, fantastic watch.

👍🏻

As I grew into manhood, I grew to where I can wear a watch that doesn't qualify as "unisex".

Ha, the only two Tudor models that interest me, funny enough.

The Aussie hypes Hublot (probably for sponsorship cash and false masculity) and bashes Tudor, now tell me why he's a watch expert?

@LouisMorales-zx3jm

Жыл бұрын

Just save and buy a Rolex. Tudor. Just ok.

Agree Pelagos and Ranger look like a concept watch, Alpha version of a product.

What a genius

Honestly, I think of the most hyped watches from Tudor and I think of BB58, BB Pro, and Pelagos 39mm. The Pelagos 39 is literally the Tudor everyone is talking about right now. Plus it does have some nods to the Sub with the red lettering. I went for the BB 41mm after trying on the 58 and it just felt too small for a diver. But I also have big wrists 40-41 is really my sweet spot. I love this conversation. Tudor has always had Rolex comparisons for a reason. So just buy the ones you like!

@vianouche1

Жыл бұрын

8 sentences: 5 "thanks mister obvious" statements and 3 where you tell us about you

So the Aussie thinks the P42 is too chunky and "blocky" while wearing a hideously chunky "blocky" ring that looks like it was was chopped off the end of a bit of old pipe. I'm 6'4 with a 7.5 inch wrist, the P42 fits me just fine, the unisex P39 looks like I'm borrowing my wife's watch. Only small men or women should wear the P39.

I can’t stand the new ranger either. Such a lost opportunity by them and could of been great. What are thoughts on 1926’s? Interested in one for a dress/office watch.

As there is only limited space and time for me to make some kind of comment. What absolute drivel coming out of Andrews mouth. A comment on masculinity… coming from the man who removed his shirt on a live podcast. And, who says we have to grow up or become more refined. No one that’s who. I don’t own a Pelagos by the way. Again subjective drivel.

I agree with the Ranger. Great concept just seems to be missing something. Maybe still a tad large but I can’t disagree with the pelagos more… one of my favorites. I own the fxd and I love the lhd…contemplating being a 2 pelagos owner

You are wrong….people want to buy my BB58 Blue on bracelet for MsRP all day…

The pelagos is good, but it is a tool. The black bay is more luxury a nice watch.

Jeez, if he thinks the Tudor Pelagos is "big, blocky and childlike" I'd hate to see what he thinks of the Sinn U1 or U50.

@desireless4092

Жыл бұрын

Would probably be another cucked and cringe take. His wife's boyfriend needs to discpline him

Pelagos is the best Tudor watch

The blue pelagos is the worst shade of blue on the market, the paragraph of white text is absurd and that goofy spring loaded clasp is horribly overrated.

Can’t believe my ears. The Pelagos 42mm is the OG. The 39mm Pelagos is like a two wheel drive suv. A pretender that just stays on the drive when it snows. 🤮

Finally someone saying this! Thznks Andrew 🙏🏻

These people know nothing really.

yup, hate Andrew from About Effing Time!!! Pelagos is fab! done.

You do need a 'sin-bin'. Put Tudor and AP in it immediately

You are talking rubbish mate it’s the best watch ever.

First it has nothing to do with the watch, a guy wearing a dive watch in a suit is unacceptable in any means, regardless of the brand. Secondly, we all need to grow up. It’s 2023 and we still buy inflated mechanical watches. 😂

Don’t like the Ranger. The hour hand looks like a plug…and not one that goes into an outlet 😉

@lirrfan3879

Жыл бұрын

@@thegorn I said that at a local a local AD and the sales lady hit the floor laughing. 😀

@xavious5017

Жыл бұрын

Clearly looks like a broadhead arrow; except for those desperate to see the perverse in everything....

The entire Tudor brand is overrated and was heavily promoted prior to its relaunch in 2013. They make homage watches baptized by the parent company Rolex, which somehow makes it ok.

overrated 100

I agree with the Ranger, it just feels lazy, rather than being true to the original they just used what they had to throw together a new watch, no effort at all and its the soze and design is why lovers of the vintage ranger and giving it a pass.

Total agree. BB58 is the way to go

All Tudor watches are overrated.

@desireless4092

Жыл бұрын

Like your mum

The Pelagos is just hideous and that blue is gagicious. While the clasp is great the rest is just dull and that Ti scratches like there is no tomorrow . I went the BB58 route (boring I know ) but to me it was the better looking watch

@racebannon2332

Жыл бұрын

The Pelagos blue is stunning and represents the perfect tool watch. Yes, the Ti will scratch, as will SS, who cares it’s a “tool watch”. I had mine for yrs and it’s amazing. I also have the 39

Tudor is overrated in general and the thickness problem is not acceptable at the new higher prices they are trying to charge. The Ranger is a 58 parts bin Explorer homage done badly. I do like it though 😬

Yes, Tudors are juvenile. You don’t realise it until you do and then you stop wasting your money

Tudor is COMPLETELY overrated in a whole! I look at Tudor as a watch brand for individuals that can't afford a Rolex or other brands at the price point from $6 to $15 Thousand. Sorry.