No matter which car, I hope I'll never experience crashes like these.

@interstate80.

5 ай бұрын

Be safe out there

@nihatasicioglu7344

3 ай бұрын

Amen

@hankz7510

21 күн бұрын

Dummys cant die

Apart from the door coming off the 2001 Taurus did better than I expected to be fair, given it’s age it didn’t collapse like the Chrysler Concorde

@colinvickers1191

6 ай бұрын

If you look carefully, the door doesn't actually come off, just the exterior door skin. The car actually did pretty well given the severity and exceedingly rare type of collision with a pole.

@TheOzthewiz

6 ай бұрын

@@colinvickers1191 How do we know that the CRASH TEST DUMMY did "well"? There was no follow up of the DUMMY "injuries"!

@richieschmidt9480

6 ай бұрын

I agree. You can see the car kind of deflect away from the pole.

@0w3nn

6 ай бұрын

Are you guys just casually ignoring the fact that none of the airbags deployed?

@colinvickers1191

6 ай бұрын

@0w3nn while the Ford Taurus of this vintage doesn't have side curtain airbags, you're right that neither front airbag deployed. Curious.

Those poor Crash test dummies paid the ultimate sacrifice so we won't have to 🙏

@TheOzthewiz

6 ай бұрын

Most of these vehicles were "DEATH TRAPS", near ZERO survivability !

@ZapperRS

6 ай бұрын

Dummy lives matter

@JamesK7911

6 ай бұрын

There’s literally a dummy family with different sizes for lighter and heavier males and females as well as small to tiny dummies representing children

@AaronDuncan

5 ай бұрын

40,000 per year pay the ultimate sacrifice for the privilege of driving

@JamesK7911

5 ай бұрын

Not to mention all the cars who gave up their life for this test to help protect us all too

The really sad thing is this tests are conducted between 30 and 40 MPH. Very unrealistic in real world driving. I am a retired volunteer fire fighter/EMT. Over the years, many improvements have been made, but even with airbags and ABS and stability control, you still stand a good chance of being killed in even a moderate impact crash. Seatbelts and airbags help. Sometimes.

@crashcore_cc

6 ай бұрын

Agreed. My hope is that automatic emergency braking systems continue to improve and are better able to reduce the impact speed from highway speeds to these tested speeds.

@tcpnetworks

6 ай бұрын

The speed was set as the upper limit of survivability. Much more and you are a corpse... There's nothing much you can do about that. Hit a tree in a NCAP 5 star car from last year at 100Km/h and you are dead... Clip a rail at 50Km/h - you might be okay. The vast majority of crashes happen at lower speeds, where good engineering has an affect on safety.

@Combatpzman

6 ай бұрын

The vast majority of crashes are under 50MPH on city streets. It is realistic, they test at those speeds for a reason.

@obeseperson

6 ай бұрын

If you’re about to crash you gotta use the brake

@MrTommyboy68

6 ай бұрын

@@obeseperson Most people aren't paying attention or are driving while on their phones (or whatever) and it usually happens within a span of time that your body can't react.

The crash sound effects are out of this world!😂

@ammarisrar2005

6 ай бұрын

They are so bad 😂😂😂

@yes8032

6 ай бұрын

@@ammarisrar2005😂😂😂

@joakimberg7897

4 ай бұрын

​@@yes8032 how is that funny? Why are you laughing? They are not bad. Its the real sounds i think

@yes8032

4 ай бұрын

@@joakimberg7897 because it’s clearly edited but it’s a horrible attempt at sounding realistic! 😂😂

@thejackbox

3 ай бұрын

@@joakimberg7897it’s literally the exact same sound over and over again on every test bro 😂 so obviously fake

I know the Smart was thrown during the impact, but look at the overall structure. I'm incredibly impressed the chassis didn't fold with an impact like that

@michaelconverse5127

6 ай бұрын

Agreed, the smart car took the impact

@bleachstain9785

6 ай бұрын

Both the smart and the Mercedes that crashed into it are owned by the same parent company. As the longest running auto maker, I expect Mercedes to get it correct.

@stickynorth

5 ай бұрын

The Tridion Safety Cell uses steel that's 3X stronger than typical car metals. The rest of the body is absolute crap. All breakaway thermoplastics... I know, I own one! The cheap body panels are actually its best feature because they don't dent, warp or get scratched that easily. Hence my 2006 looks almost brand new...

@paul06660

5 ай бұрын

Even though the safety cell of the Smart car held together, the level of g-forces occupants are subjected could be devastating to a person. Especially your internal organs.

@robertbell525

4 ай бұрын

Yeah going 30-40 forward and .5 seconds later going 30 backwards can't be good for your health. Safety cage or not.

The narration in this video is very good...brief and to the point, without a lot of fluff!

@person.w9780

6 ай бұрын

It's literally an ai. At least it seems to be.

I love how @ 5:33 the dummy is like "Oh crap! Lemme turn down the radio.

@obeseperson

6 ай бұрын

He wanted to hear the crash

@TheHuskyK9

6 ай бұрын

😂😂

@brenolins9908

5 ай бұрын

Lmfao

@KevinM23

4 ай бұрын

How did you even noticed that lmao!! Good eye!

@exerminator2000

3 ай бұрын

Freebird solo ended

Those aren’t the doors coming off. Only the door skins. The doors themselves stay attached. Those pole test are brutal though.

@penguin44ca

3 ай бұрын

No that door came off

The Malibu crash tests were more about improving trailer safety designs rather than the Malibu itself.

I’ve seen at least 4 crash videos involving Chevy Astros, all fatalities. The drivers of the other cars all walked away.

@spinnetti

25 күн бұрын

Worst vehicle in relatively modern times ever... I was unfortunate enough to have one. The size and packaging was good (why I bought it), but the engineering of literally everything was so bad there should have been laws against it.

I have a friend who used to own the same model of Camry as the 2012 (idk what year it was) and she was in an accident with a drunk driver, the car burst into flames and a good Samaritan helped her out of the car. She went to the hospital and made a full recovery.

Who would've thought that Jeep Wranglers fall over? 😅 Also, the Pontiac Trans Sport's crash looks horrifying

@NGPMOD

5 ай бұрын

Yeah, one of my bes buddy's has one 😬

@thelonelywolf88

5 ай бұрын

@@NGPMOD which one lol

@iPodHL2

5 ай бұрын

The Pontiac Transport had two tests one was 1.412 mph more than the normal 40 mph and in the second official test the dummy's foot snapped off.

@thelonelywolf88

5 ай бұрын

@@iPodHL2 😂 while it folds like an accordion

@FP194

Ай бұрын

That’s why they have a complete roll cage

The Sebring was actually a recreation crash where the driver was severely injured.

The car companies still sold all these vehicles knowing they failed the collision tests

I think the reason the wrangler flipped was because the front left tire got wedged under the vehicle, acting like a ramp and flipping it over.

@TehButterflyEffect

5 ай бұрын

It still handles the crash way better than the other cars.

@mikefly562

12 күн бұрын

@@TehButterflyEffect Yeah, structurally, the jeep did ok and maintained the structure, so survivability would be quite high.

@JamesCook76131

9 күн бұрын

@@mikefly562you fail to realize that the possibility of ejection is quite higher or being thrown into oncoming traffic. Remember these are CONTROLLED environments and it did that. Imagine a real world scenario

What this video has proven is those who work at the IIHS have way too much fun with their jobs and frankly, I'm jealous

@spinnetti

25 күн бұрын

cleanup sucks though!

ah the 59 bel air crash test again. IIHS has already been called to task for this one. the bel air was structurally compromised in this test, the frame was rusted out to the point of being non rebuildable and the vehicle had been stripped of its engine and transmission leaving the engine bay free to crumple and fold back. IIHS claims the test is still valid.

@sweatysam6264

5 ай бұрын

I was wondering because I swear there was no debris coming out of the engine bay I know that most new cars are safer but this was ridiculous smh.

@infiniteblaz3416

4 ай бұрын

It doesn’t matter. Maybe if you watched Red Asphalt or Signal 30. You would see cars of that era were massive death traps and most people sustained serious injuries and even death. Idk why y’all keep living in denial.

@michaelhoward5786

4 ай бұрын

To task by who? Actual experts or third rate quarterwits?

@Andrew_460

3 ай бұрын

Wouldnt make much of a difference. The only difference would be that the engine and transmission would end up in the drivers lap.

@thelonelywolf88

Ай бұрын

Imagine all the hate they'd get if they crashed a 59 in pristine condition

If they were really concerned for your safety a roll cage would be standard in all vehicles.

@marcushull12

6 ай бұрын

I had a 1985 Lotus Excel, that had a standard safety roll cage and all TVR`s had hidden roll cages too, so it`s no really that hard to implement , Smart cars also have a Tridion cell/ cage around occupants, the crash on here there was very little cabin intrusion, even the plastic clip on door skin never few off lol

So what I got out of this video, was to avoid hitting poles

IIHS needs to start testing at real world speeds. 50mph and up. Unless you’re in a school zone nobody is crawling along at 30mph

@crashcore_cc

5 ай бұрын

I imagine they will in the future. Their focus for next couple of years will be to get more cars performing well in the updated moderate overlap and updated side impact tests. After that, they will likely raise the bar again by either adding a new test or making an existing test more challenging.

@FP194

Ай бұрын

You are far less likely to get in an accident in an interstate than city streets

@alexross4062

23 күн бұрын

These are the real world speeds. The IIHS has came out and said that the reason they test at the speeds they do is it represents the *majority* of accidents with severe injury in the US. If you make a car that holds up at 65mph, it's too stiff and turns your organs to soup at 30mph.

The weird part is, I was in a very serious accident with my chevy astro, I got hit by rocks falling from the cliff beside the highway and thrown off. Went airborne before hitting a tree and coming to a stop after going straight off a cliff, the van finally stopped 100 feet down and I survived with almost no injuries. The van held up exceptionally well and did nothing even close to whats shown here. Plus the IIhs also reported that of all vehicles on the road there were the least fatalities involving these vans. Something isnt lining up between real life and the results of that test.

@TpoapAnimatesYT

5 ай бұрын

Damn glad you ok mate

@yashsvidixit7169

3 ай бұрын

No two crashes are alike. The crash sequence is incredible chaotic, exhibiting large differences from small changes in initial conditions.

They should make cars out of whatever that pole is made of.

I doubt I'd classify the Jeep's performance as unexpected. If there's one thing I certainly always expect from a Jeep during a collision, it's a rollover.

The belair had no engine inside it. It is an infamous crash test.

@BMC1100

13 күн бұрын

The 59 has an engine in it, you can clearly see it in some of the still photos.

"Wow look at all these cars crashing" *Sees my car* "Oh..."

@CAMDENMeans

21 күн бұрын

That's more of a risk because you can hit you head

I have watched a number of these videos and read many comments. There is one very important thing I have noticed that no-one ever mentions. How about instead of teaching people how to get a license, we start teaching people how to drive and AVOID accidents???

The difference between the Fusion and the Concorde on the pole test is that the Fusion just split, where the Concorde had the A pillar smash into the passenger compartment. Though the A pillar was bent to the side on the Fusion, you can see that the passenger compartment is still intact with plenty of space for the driver. I’d rather be in the Fusion than the Concorde or even the Taurus.

The Belair test is questionable because you can see the rust come flying out on the slow motion camera... I believe it was at a structural failure point before the crash test, I would want to see the vehicle properly before I believe a plastic car beat a metal car

Both terrifying yet soothing to watch. Why do we have the tendency to watch carnage

@spinnetti

25 күн бұрын

because "there for the grace of God go I" - its a path that could be us and it wasn't and we are grateful.

Love this video guys you worked really hard this and I love and I appreciate your work and you’re amazing and rest in peace to all those cars

Where did you find this footage of the pole tests? I've followed the IIHS for years and have never seen those footages before. I don't see it on their website

@iPodHL2

5 ай бұрын

from the IIHS TechData if you want to watch it you'll need to register for an account

Could be interesting to compare this video with a video collecting the safest vehicles.

@crashcore_cc

6 ай бұрын

Good idea!

@mrbobjrsrv

4 ай бұрын

@@crashcore_cc Thank you for noticing that post and commenting on it! I am looking forward to seeing your compilation video on the safest vehicles!!!

5:41 There wasn’t much space before the crash either. These are small, cheap, econo-boxes. It’s unrealistic to think they’d do well in any type of accident with an immovable object.

The c class performed really well

The sound effects are great. I especially love the airbag, 'pop hiss'

My dad had a 2008 Ford Fusion and crashed it in the morning when the lights were blinking yellow and some dude sped through it and sent my dad flying into the rail guard, just minor injuries but his glasses broke and his orange juice went flying.

It doesn't take much to roll modern SUVs, even without an impact. People over correct too fast and flip the darn things.

@angelgjr1999

6 ай бұрын

Trucks and SUVs are not as safe as people think. They love to roll. I’d much rather be in a sedan if an accident occurs.

@chrislj2890

6 ай бұрын

@@angelgjr1999 Yeah, a Ford Crown Victoria would be my choice.

@angelgjr1999

6 ай бұрын

@@chrislj2890 Those things are tanks. Wish ford still made them. I’d buy a modern version of it. :)

@chrislj2890

6 ай бұрын

@@angelgjr1999 Amen, brother!

@RS-dc7wy

6 ай бұрын

Type "Moose test" into YT and you'll see effects of evasive steering at speed.

4:15 I love how the wheel not only survives but also bends the heck out of the truck's structure

Incredible. I wonder how 2023/2024 vehicles will fair.

@that_mazdamiata

6 ай бұрын

#yourfirst

@crashcore_cc

6 ай бұрын

Almost every new vehicle aces these tests (which is a great safety development). The bar has been raised with the updated side impact and updated moderate overlap test.

@digitaljon1109

6 ай бұрын

I am curious how my 2024 Mitsubishi Mirage will do in the updated test. @@crashcore_cc

@mypronouniswtf5559

6 ай бұрын

New cars are bigger and heavier than these cars shown...

@digitaljon1109

6 ай бұрын

No. New cars come as light at 2,000 LB.@@mypronouniswtf5559

It was absolutely moronic to destroy that beautiful '59 Bel Air! For what? To prove motor vehicle design had changed over the decades? Well, no shit!

Fascinating, i was actually expecting every featured vehicle to be from Dodge/Ram/Chrysler/Jeep/Fiat.

The 03-08 Honda Accord is one of the most indestructible cars ever made. It held up better than all the others in the post test.

Those vehicles are not losing their doors though, it's the outer metal skin. It's a pretty big difference.

One point of correction: Not one of the cars had a door come off. The door structures were all in place, albeit badly deformed. What was seen to come off in all cases was the door skin. This part is essentially decorative, adding no strength to the door itself.

Jeep Wranglers are too dam expensive to be failing any test

The almighty Holden VB Commodore is still king when it comes to the worst crash test ever

@sinkbro

5 ай бұрын

I mean if you knew what was the backstory you'd think differently

@BMC1100

13 күн бұрын

You mean the best crash test ever.

For the Jeep Wrangler it's mostly the fault that a significant portion of the car's front end is fender

@crashcore_cc

6 ай бұрын

It will likely take a full re-design to fix this issue.

@isend2c

6 ай бұрын

It's almost like there's a better way to design a vehicle 🤷🏼‍♂️

@madmatt2024

6 ай бұрын

@@crashcore_cc The Jeep is still WAY safer than any other car shown doing the pole or small overlap test in this video. There was no cabin intrusion and the occupant would most likely have walked away.

@boredguy2935

6 ай бұрын

​@isend2c jeeps are stupidly safe, actually. Rollover prone yes, but all suvs are.

@isend2c

6 ай бұрын

@@boredguy2935 maybe you feel so anecdotally, but the data doesn't support that, from here or NHTSA of IIHS.

The jeep wasnt bad. Part of the fun of a Jeep is rolling over, its to be expected. Otherwise dummy was safely belted in and looked unscathed

@noahsanchez2093

5 күн бұрын

The only reason it flipped over is because the suspension is designed for offloading so the suspension is all jacked up.

Let’s all drink a toast to these poor dummies! Thank you for keeping us safe!🥂💪

That Transport/Montana counts for all of its brothers, the Venture, and Silhouette.

The small overlap test is the most difficult for any car. The iihs introduced the small overlap test in 2012, so all of the cars before 2012 were not designed for it, so of course they failed.

My grandmother's one and only accident was in a '96 Chevy Astro. She was t-boned at an intersection and it flipped the van. Her seatbelt held her in place and may be the only reason she survived.

I think, it is not bad, that Jeep turned over after collision. cabin were intact, and car just bounced away, sliding on a side and slowly and harmfully disparing energy on longer time, so it makes less stress on car occupants

How many channels do you have? I just keep accidentally finding more and I’m like hey this is the guy from documenting evil, it really is impressive how diverse your content is

@crashcore_cc

5 ай бұрын

This is my only channel 🙂

I believe that these crash tests have their own original sound. It is not necessary to put the same sound under every video. Especially since these crash tests carry information not only in their sight, but also in their sound. In addition, it should have been noted that the Chevy Malibu crashing into trucks was not a test of the car, but a test of how to make such accidents more survivable with crash-absorbing accessories installed on trucks.

This video was amazing! Very well done and professional. (I’d take the Ford Taurus) 😊

@crashcore_cc

6 ай бұрын

Thank you!

7:01 the Mercedes Logo in the front grill flies off at the impact

idk whats going in but this looks like an awesome job

My Aunt had an Astro mini-van back in the days. That thing was a POS box on wheels

The ripping off doors is the safest one (if you have a seatbelt on) since it's easier to get out

What about the Nissan Quest? That van did horribly in the small overlap test.

I will state this as an emergency physician. In car crash, that seat belt will lower the risk of sudden death. It will turn sudden death to a manageable life thretening condition which can be cured or reverse by operation or proficiency I excel in but you will suffer a lot of pain, disability. The most safest way to prevent injury is to drive it safe make sure accident not to happen.

'Merica Our junks, I mean cars are safe! Here's 10 million dollars senator, buy yourself a caddy

@boredguy2935

6 ай бұрын

The modern Japanese cars in these tests are performing worse than the 90s American cars.....

Final Destination: Car Crash Test Edition

What about 1997-2003 Ford F-150 moderate overlap test and 2011-2017 Nissan Quest small overlap test?

1:52 may this be the answer to everyone asking "how come everyone in America is getting trucks and SUVs and nobody wants a regular sized car anymore?"

@TheOzthewiz

6 ай бұрын

OR, have a DEATH WISH by purchasing a sub-compact car!

@sergeant_cross_

6 ай бұрын

Yeah I don't think that safety concerns are actually what buyers have on their minds most of the times

@paulreilly3904

6 ай бұрын

I understand that thinking, but size is a help, but not always accurate as to how well passenger cabins resist intrusion. Also, the high centre of gravity of an SUV helps it to roll over.

@chriskonte1909

6 ай бұрын

This is the reason, why all parents want their kids to drive a big SUV.. But this is a 2 edged sword; teenagers have a much higher chance of getting (causing) an accident. As you can see perfectly with the Jeep Wrangler, SUVs and offroaders have a higher chance of rolling over. My brother drives a compact MPV and it's perfect. 102hp, manual transmission and good on gas and it's safe!

@paulreilly3904

6 ай бұрын

@@chriskonte1909 thanks for your comment Chris. Interesting. Some thoughts of mine. There's plenty of truth in saying if I drive a bigger, heavier vehicle I'm probably going to come off better in an accident with a normal size and weight sedan. ( I'm English but will use American terms to try to be understandable to a wider audience.) But many mid size sedans have better /safer passenger compartments than say an Ford F 150 pick up. Tests for safety are very important because they offer buyers the ability to make informed choices and ensure manufacturers are held to standards. The very best manufacturers use safety as a selling point. There is the danger of a sort of arms race where the manufacturers make bigger heavier vehicles to protect their buyers, think Audi Q8, Lincoln Navigator, Range Rovers, etc. And electric cars are even heavier. Above a certain speed / kinetic energy level no accident is survivable.

Of course the Smart Fortwo went flying! It only weighs 1600 lbs or so... It's a hamster ball of plastic and steel compared to most vehicles... Still safe though. The Tridion safety cell is extra strong to compensate...

I know thats not the proper small overlap test but all things considered for a 2001 and 2000s design it held up pretty damn well in the experimental version of the small overlap. the dummies head even hit the airbag which I am surprised by

What is the music In the first half of the video?

how did you find these footage? The iihs never released some of them before

@ErrorsAndComputers

6 ай бұрын

IIHS techdata website

Wow, we’ve come a long way!

@alancrisp1582

6 ай бұрын

🤔 Maybe so, but some of us mere mortals. Still prefer to only drive very old classic vehicles. Because they have far more personality !!...

Smart 4 2 is more like a street legal golf cart

When I saw the car hit the back of the semi as a truck driver I’ll never forget the 18 year old who came around my truck at a high speed and hit the back of a trailer and went under! When everyone went to see if she was okay before anyone could arrive her torso and head were decapitated and the only thing we saw was her lower half!

If sheet metal separating from the door qualifies for this list, then you forgot to add the 2011 Honda Odyssey.

Do you have the 2021-24 the newer updated version of Lexus IS 350 testing video or results? Thanks!

@crashcore_cc

2 ай бұрын

The driver side small overlap results from the 2017-2020 IS also apply to the refreshed 2021-24 models. The passenger side did see structural improvements though. The IS will be featured in my next video coming out soon.

Didnt expect that from a Lexus, and a post 2005 model.

The purpose of crash testing is not to eliminate injuries, but to raise the speed at which they become serious or fatal. All vehicles will have a speed at which a crash into a fixed object will be non-survivable. If you are going to crash into another vehicle however, then be in the heavier vehicle and your chances improve, at the expense of killing the occupants of the smaller car. If you drive a Smart Car colour yourself Stupid. If you drive a very tall vehicle with a high center of gravity you run the risk of a roll-over and you may die without hitting anything other than a soft shoulder on the road.

Crash speeds would be a nice addition to your videos.

@crashcore_cc

6 ай бұрын

Thank you for the suggestion. I’m incorporating this in new videos going forward.

@krazi77

5 ай бұрын

I'm guessing they were all doing at least 90 or more.

And to think we’ve driven around in a lot of these. Might I add 1990 Ford Sierra and the TSURU1??

@zoitaaaa

5 ай бұрын

Ah!! There is the Tsuru!

In all seriousness, how can you expect a car to be severely damaged, and its passengers severely injured or killed, in some of these crashes? Crashing the corner of the car into a pole cemented into the ground? A car going underneath a tractor trailer at highway speeds? Or going underneath the edge of the back of a tractor trailer? It's a metal box with sharp right angles. How are the passengers of the car going to survive hitting that?

@elliottcarson1248

6 ай бұрын

Lots of drunk/distracted people hit poles and trees. I think its also supposed to simulate clipping another car head on. If we can engineer cars to be safer in those type of crashes then why not? I'm also pretty sure modern tractor trailers are engineered to be safer for cars.

@michaelhoward5786

4 ай бұрын

They are supposed to have guards on the back (the trucks).

@Amazonian11

3 ай бұрын

I think you meant to say how can you expect a car to NOT be severely damaged...

We should bring back the pole crash test we don't see it anymore

In the old days, auto companies tested their cars either in the lab or a test track, unfortunately today some car companies uses it's customers as test dummies, not cool baby not cool at all.

@windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823

Ай бұрын

"Some??" No, try "ALL." ALL major car cos have literally done this. Knowingly killed people. See Brian Chase. Still Unsafe at Any Speed

A video that didn't appear here, but fits the theme: somewhere in the IIHS Archives is a crash test of a 2016 Honda Pilot being crashed into a 2016 Honda Civic. During the crash test, the Civic's seatbelt severs and sends the dummy violently into the steering wheel and dashboard. I assume the IIHS was going to publish it and various other SUV vs. Small Car tests in a piece about the compatibility issue in crashes. For some reason, though, they decided against it, perhaps due to the Civic's abnormality muddying the data.

@crashcore_cc

5 ай бұрын

I’ll take a look - thanks for the suggestion!

@windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823

Ай бұрын

It's really not THAT abnormal. Look for Brian Chase. Still Unsafe at Any Speed. Auto litigator. Book is oop. Hard to find.

When modern cars effectively have no continuous frame front to back... The car will always buckle in the center.

I drive a 2007 mercury Milan which is the cousin of the Ford fusion. So what your saying is when I hit a pole I'm donzo?

3:45 nice! Now I know what my next car will be. 😂😅

I’m surprised that the Nissan Quest (2014) wasn’t shown here.

We have come a long way from 2005

I love how they ruin that Bel Air

What song was the first song

The wrangler was hilarious

Everyone lost their collective minds over the Bel Air. The Jeep - insanely bad engineering...

@platterfoot

6 ай бұрын

I lost my mind because it was a waste of a pristine classic car 🤣

@tcpnetworks

6 ай бұрын

@@platterfoot That car was anything but pristine...

@krazi77

5 ай бұрын

it was rigged to fold up like that

@tcpnetworks

5 ай бұрын

@@krazi77 You are letting your stupidity show. It isn't pretty..... It wasn't. It was an example as to how a car built with no critical safety goes up against another car that had.... Even if it was a pile of shit 'Merkin Malibu.

4:44 Whats that music name it's relaxing i want the name

RIP to all the crash test dummies 😢

a suv rolling over when given a side impuls is not surprising. the CG is so far up that it's just bound to happen.

Rest in peace Crash Test Dummies you’re always be remembered in the afterlife gun crash tested more

Can you guys make with these videos with a Chevy with a infinity QX 60

Oof, can't believe they crashed a classic Bel Air

That Chevy Astro was completely totaled