If Weitering doesn’t get Aa full back this year there’s something wrong with the selection committee

TDK does amazing things....(to football)

@caitlinhughes8406

4 күн бұрын

Nicely done

@dilanabey

3 күн бұрын

that is a deep cut of australian tech!

The afl needs a brothers ruleset, if two brothers are on eachother you cant suspend or give free's against. Let them fight it out haha

Gawn free kick for/against ratio getting back to the 2020 level highs again lol

Only a minute or so, but at least an acknowledgement of how the Swans have destroyed this season like only 2 other teams in the history of the AFL competition (Essendon 2000 and Cats 2007). However, I do enjoy all the wishfulfilment-like, pithy, hypotheticals about [insert random team] even coming close to the Swans this year.

TDK has had a very good year.. actually better than Max Gawn

@Littleyeti7

3 күн бұрын

Idiotic Carlton fans lol. TDK breaks the rules every ruck contest.

@aussieintexas61

3 күн бұрын

@@Littleyeti7 how. please explain.

@Littleyeti7

3 күн бұрын

@@aussieintexas61 first rule 18.4.1 is that ruckman who’s purpose is solely to contest the ball shall be allowed to do so or shall be awarded a free kick. 14.4.3 b - cant push or bump deliberately before contesting the football. Watch the replay, on almost EVERY contest he has in the ruck his first objective is to push the opposing ruck, and often blatantly in the back but yet somehow (Carlton paper bag payments the highly likely key reason) the umpires seem to allow it to continue despite many other rucks in the AFL regularly being penalised. De Koning by the rules gave away at least 15 free kicks v Geelong along that weren’t paid. He was the same against Essendon the game prior also.

@Littleyeti7

3 күн бұрын

@@aussieintexas61 go watch the first goal of the game v Geelong. Clearly not watching the ball, and blatantly shoves a ruckman. Then that’s not called but the tiniest little bit of body the other way gets called a block in the ruck lol. Carlton are such an embarrassing charity case of a club.

ngl I'm okay with dangerous tackles like dangerfields just being a free kick, no issue with it being called considering how walsh's head hit the ground. But it wasnt hard enough for a week

Sam Walsh had both his arms pins so he couldn’t protect himself , Dangerfield was responsible and failed duty of care..

@Littleyeti7

3 күн бұрын

Shut up, it’s clear as day that Walsh deliberately through his head into the ground and he should be fined like Steven May.

@Saint_Svadhisthana_Sahasrara_1

3 күн бұрын

Nah, Paddy shouldn’t get a week for that! Bloody Rubbish.

@BlooBagger

3 күн бұрын

@@Littleyeti7you serious????you really think that. I don’t think Danger should go btw

@Littleyeti7

3 күн бұрын

@@BlooBagger he definitely did. I have almost 20 years experience in sports biomechanics and human movement. There is absolutely nothing other than Walsh deliberately throwing his head downward causing that movement and anyone in the biomechanics world will tell you the same. He should be fined like May.

@Littleyeti7

3 күн бұрын

@@BlooBagger take a polygraph into the tribunal and ask Walsh to answer one question if he threw his head towards the ground, also, he did it twice last week and both times the umpires didn’t pay it and one even said “nah, you played for it”

If Weitering doesn’t get Aa full back this year there’s something wrong with the selection committee

@Vultures-fl8ps

Күн бұрын

Lacks composure in big moments