It’s unbearable when they talk over the guest nonstop

@dreadthedreads4567

2 ай бұрын

Yea tryna crack lil jokes while your guest is tryna explain some shit is hella childish

@Jay-jw4yi

2 ай бұрын

@@dreadthedreads4567no it’s not it’s called being a comedian. Yall forgeting this is a comedy podcast

@dreadthedreads4567

2 ай бұрын

@@Jay-jw4yi yea kinda hard 2 hear the jokes and the guest talking at the same time Last time I checked comedians didn’t try 2 crack jokes while ppl were on stage talking

@Jay-jw4yi

2 ай бұрын

@@dreadthedreads4567 no but they make jokes amongst other comedians/entertainers in conversation. Being quick-whitted is part of being a great comedian and that’s what these guys are trying to do. Like I said it’s comedy podcast.

@alejanboom4520

2 ай бұрын

Broooooooooo!!! lol thank you

Sometimes I'm trying to hear what JJ has to say only for him to get cut off over and over again by these guys talking some nonsense. Let the guest speak, jesus.

@johncalvo1743

Ай бұрын

Not just that they are doing this, but that they are buffoons.

@watchcritic8928

Ай бұрын

Because Redick is talking nonsense.

@bdub1934

16 күн бұрын

He really has no clue what he is talking about. Him or any NBA today could even make a team back then not less play. Thats facts the game was different and much harder. It wasn't about entertainment. You had to keep you hand on top the ball, palm down, no steps at all! You couldn't run into you defender at all without getting a charge and that went for anywhere on the floor

@YouGotServed835

5 күн бұрын

JJ is jockeying for positions within the NBA... whether it be analyst, or 'coaching' for Lebron. If you think he'll say anything remotely honest, I'm sure youll eat up whatever BS your politicians are selling to you too.

Didn’t see a lot of talk about MJ in this clip.

@winstonperra8070

2 ай бұрын

tf r u talking about

@fredrickjohnson9473

2 ай бұрын

​@@winstonperra8070u dumb or stupid?

@MistahUnknown

2 ай бұрын

Do you know what a clickbait is?

@stevem2323

Ай бұрын

@@winstonperra8070 What he's talking about? He's talking about they not mentioning MJ at all.

The way they interrupt JJ with the corniest jokes while he is explaining his insights is beyond annoying lol. JJ was a better at basketball than they are at comedy, he is an expert!

@chrisallmaras1463

2 ай бұрын

Nah JJ is full of it and the only good part of the video was them roasting him at the end smh

@keekbackVidzHD

Ай бұрын

@@chrisallmaras1463 ah, we have seen the foolish casual.

@angeljael965

Ай бұрын

Nahhhh!!

@lukepittle8961

Ай бұрын

JJ 100% was annoyed being cut off all episode and knew it was a waste of his time. He’s at his best with Tim Legler and Lebron talking great basketball.

@uncleasian8697

25 күн бұрын

Dude jj is corny. Dudes acting like bird wouldn’t drain 3s in my face. Jj wouldn’t even have made the Celtics starting line up unless ainge got injured 😂.

Can MJ compete? 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Dude he would literally kill.

@DallanRichey

Ай бұрын

He would average 40-50 in this league

@SumboodyNao

Ай бұрын

@@DallanRicheyhe would average 22 MAX lmao he’s worse than Derozan

@DallanRichey

Ай бұрын

@@SumboodyNao 😂

@GoPackGo-mm5lm

Ай бұрын

@@SumboodyNaoit’s incredible, everything you said was flat out false

@JediMasterSirDwightInshi-ed4si

Ай бұрын

@@GoPackGo-mm5lmfor real, in this league with no defense or physicality he would run laps over this league. This dude doesn’t even know that MJ lead the league in scoring ten times in a more physical and tougher generation😂

The Richard Jefferson jab had me rollin they really boys😂😂

This podcast would be much better produced if Akaash could be muted before releasing.

@hvgoldart

2 ай бұрын

And andrew

@mikesolomon6130

2 ай бұрын

False statement

@CommunityNotesVerified

2 ай бұрын

#FreeAndrewTate

If Larry played in this era, he'd destroy 3PT records for his position. The game is different now, they shoot more 3s and if Bird shot more 3s, he would definitely be up there. JJ is wack on that narrative. Larry was a cold ass motherfucker.

@Wheresthelove7

Ай бұрын

Spot on bulls eye my man. Bird was fire

@John6-40

19 күн бұрын

Reddick is a klutch sports client. He caters to the young gen and tickles their ears by downing the old guys. Reddick is a Dan Majerle. Probably not even that good, because Thunder Dan was a better athlete and defender than Reddick ever was. My point is that someone of that ilk isn't fit to be talking down on someone like Bird. Bird would've hung 50 on Reddick without breaking a sweat. The worst part about Reddick is that kids buy this whole intellectual act by Reddick. He ain't smarter than any of the older players, who weren't AAU and were raised on fundamental basketball. Plus he's no different than SAS or Nick Wright. He's just another hot take artist. The only difference is that he stooges even harder for LeBron and the current gen of players. More trash TV.

@lukesullivan8071

14 сағат бұрын

Tell me you don’t watch basketball without telling me you don’t watch basketball

Not only compete, he would dominate, with all the spacing and no hand checking I can see jordan going for 40-45 points a night

@michaelh7125

Ай бұрын

Fairly easily in my opinion, and perhaps even off the floor shortly after the midway point of the fourth. I want some analytic dude to figure out if Iverson is number one in the all-time on his ass in the paint list. They have ruined the sport in order to appease a more casual fan that prefers to watch offense. A 30 ppg average in today's NBA is like a 21, 22, average even ten or fifteen years ago. It's getting to the point of unwatchable, like the NFL. NCAA is a much better game in both basketball and football now.

@kaaybomb

Ай бұрын

​@@michaelh7125no, they play this way because it works. Much easier to score when the floor is spread out with 3 point shooters instead of Charles Oakley or Otis Thorpe clogging the lane and spotting up from 10 ft.

@michaelh7125

Ай бұрын

@@kaaybomb That is certainly part of it. The promotion of offense to the detriment of defense, is more what I was alluding to.

@kaaybomb

Ай бұрын

@@michaelh7125 yeah but people were bitching about games ending 80-72 back then too

@michaelh7125

Ай бұрын

@@kaaybomb Yeah, the guys that watch a couple basketball games a year. Possessions were way fewer back then, with very few three point shot attempts. Paint and midrange game, real basketball. It's like they way they destroyed the NFL; Dump off passes into the flat and very little running game. Give me a Barry Sanders, Herschel Walker, Bo Jackson sweep any day.

Curry Has The 12th Best Career 3pt Shooting % In History, Does That Mean He's Not A Top 5 Shooter Of All Time?

Did this dude really try to compare Larry Legend to Draymond Green???? lol 😂

@solacenmute4840

Ай бұрын

You see how he got offended and said he didn't practice spot but jabs Larry when players didn't practice 3s back then

@Wheresthelove7

Ай бұрын

I appreciate JJ but he really doesn't grasp the greatness of Bird. None of these young pod hoodlums get it. He would fuck up anyone excluding MJ.

@chadbinette3201

Ай бұрын

Draymond would of got his ass whooped in the 90s , someone like bird, rodman and on. If draymond pulled his cheap dirty bs on those boys Draymond would be running to the locker room crying

JJ Redick says he was not as good a spot up 3 point shooter as he could have been because he did not practice spot up 3 pointers. Then he wants to compare Larry Bird to the best current 3 point shooters who practice their 3 point shooting far more than Larry Bird ever did. And that's a FACT. The "I didn't practice" excuse should work for Larry Bird as much as it does for JJ Redick.

The irony of the entire "we done with the 90's" campaign is that the premium placed on raw athleticism and power of players peaked in the 1990's - early 2000's. This is because of the rules that were in place at the time. The only guys winning MVPs in the 1990's looked like and were built like Michael Jordan, Olajuwon, Shaq, and David Robinson. As soon as the NBA started changing the rules to make the game easier for less athletic players, Steve Nash and other international players started to win MVPs. And now we have the league that we have today.

Akaash couldn’t let Jj make his first point.. let your guest speak! Dam..

@chad6326

Ай бұрын

Seethe, bronsexual

JJ is gonna be upset when some kid calling wemby the goat is gonna bring down LBJ saying JJ is a plumber that couldn't guard anyone

@brianogrady3185

2 ай бұрын

“JJ and LeBron played against a bunch of Tweeters and Podcast hosts”

@ozonespec

2 ай бұрын

The skill of players today is at it's max. Not much will advance when it comes to the NBA. I doubt some kid will say that because skill level will be the same in the future.

@MrJ1S

2 ай бұрын

@ozonespec that's what every generation thinks. Kids don't care. They will find their goat and put him on top

@Jet.Single

2 ай бұрын

No ones going to call this generation plumbers and ice cream truck drivers. This era has Stephan Curry for crying out loud. Kevin Durant. Dirk Newitsky. Kobe Bryant. Kyrie Irving. Some of the most talented and skilled players ever. Tim Duncan, Joel Embiid, Nikola Jokic are probably the most skilled big men in nba history. Not to mention shaq diesel the most dominate big man ever which he didn’t become till the 2000s anyone who actually watches the game knows. that. Talent level has evolved too much to call these guys anything but professionals at their craft.

@MrJ1S

2 ай бұрын

@Jet.Single kids...dont....care. w.e u grow up with u think is the best. It Can't get better than it is now and everything b4 u sucks. It never changes when it comes to music and sports. Ur tune changes a little when u get older. But from this new generation they really go out of their way to disrespect what came b4 them. Wemby will be their goat. And when Currys 3 point record is broken they'll diss him the same

Fact: Bird got 50/40/90 twice. Bird almost got it 4x, but fell short by a fraction of a percent on FTs and FGs.

Here's an idea, let him answer your question and you just might get the info you're looking for

don't ask Jj Reddick he's delusional

37 ppg easily becomes 40 in today's game

So what was JJ in his era...a Starbucks barista

The janitor comment was right in the 1950s and early 60s only 2 players played basketball full time as there career Cousy and Russell changed in mid 60s onwards as became more professional. Then again Russell would be top 5 talent today 6'10 athletic high IQ amazing defender.

@JosePena-hj6ll

25 күн бұрын

rules changed carry traveling be called

Tell Schulz to lay off the adderall man

Jerry West called him out on the plumbers and firemen BS lol. He took a break from ESPN and didnt reply to it. REPLY TO THE MAN.

@sunnygee5521

Ай бұрын

No need to lie to push your narrative. You can support it with facts. Bending narratives like this suggests a lack of confidence.

@rsdhillon4198

Ай бұрын

@@sunnygee5521 googles your friend

He’s a catch and shooter😂😂😂

@CommunityNotesVerified

2 ай бұрын

.Pa-jeet.moment.

Could he compete???? Man would dominate with ease

Jeff Hornacek the Utah plumber has greater stats than JJ and was an all star 😂😂

@swindlek8061

2 ай бұрын

he didn’t play in the 50s

@chad6326

Ай бұрын

​@@swindlek8061Cousey would cook JJ... you bronsexuals are trash lol

MJ would be bored out his mind from the lack of competition today. He'd also have carpal tunnel trying to move his fingers with the four rings the each had on them

MJ would still be GOAT if he played today. If he came up now, AAU, 1 yr college to the Association he would have the modern skill set to dominate. He has John Wick will power.

Honestly the argument is sound. It works with any sport. Compare early MMA with modern MMA, the worst, lowest paid UFC fighter is beating the best fighters of the 90s and 00s

@patrikkarlsson9523

2 ай бұрын

Most, at least some of the top 75 players in the past are the reason present players are so good. They learnt from and built upon past players. With that said,of course a player like Bird would be great today if he had this version of NBA to be inspired by.

@justinojminer

2 ай бұрын

facts. they were all specialists originally. Gracie would have been murdered by anyone that could defend a takedown or strike a little.

@conduitofthegospeldarrellb9154

2 ай бұрын

This is poor logic and example of a failing educational system. The difference between modern MMA and the past isn’t remotely the gap you’re insinuating. When is the last time human beings evolved? Start there. Rules and the growth of the game is the difference. More fighters mean a great variety of ability at top and bottom. Put the past fighters down and have them watch todays MMA and they’d be just as good if not better.

@Foriegn684

2 ай бұрын

Thats not an argument its called evolution.

@instaves

2 ай бұрын

its not sound to anyone with working eyes and over room temp IQ

I would have loved to see a one on one between MJ and “plumber” reddick

these 40 yr olds giggling and bro-ing out instead of letting their guest speak

Honestly shulz was at his most insufferable during these two clips. First time a clip has made me not want to seek out the whole podcast.

@chad6326

Ай бұрын

Seethe, you bronsexual

The guys that played in the Bird era went to the basket, they attacked the basket, the days before you could get kicked out of the game for a foul. The three point shot wasn't used as a weapon back then, it was used when needed. Today, it's a weapon that even the 7 footers use.

Current players have such an advantage in how the game is officiated and played, spacing, free flowing nature of the game, etc. Michael Jordan, Larry Bird and other players from past eras had to work to create whatever space they could and if they played in today's NBA would have far less shots contested than they had when they played in the 80s and 90s. All aspects of offense is far easier now and over the last 10 years or so then it was in the 80s and 90s.

JJ is better than to sit with Schultz and his laugh track boys

Dell curry , Larry bird , mark price , John Paxson ,Craig Hodges , and downtown Freddie Brown would have loved todays game of unlimited threes …

By JJ Redick's logic - these are OBJECTIVELY the 12 best 3-Point shooters of all time: Steve Kerr, Hubert Davis, Luke Kennard, Dražen Petrović, Joe Harris, Jason Kapono, Tim Legler, Seth Curry, Steve Novak, Kyle Korver, and Steve Nash. This list is made up of players who played in the 80s, 90s, and 2000s. Clearly Steph Curry is not on JJ Redick's list as one of the top 5 or 10 3-point shooters of all time. OBJECTIVELY speaking.

Well that's 5 minutes of my life I'll never get back

Bird. 3 nba mvps in a row. Killer iq, competitor and clutch. Won 3point contest. Beat showtime, beat badboys, beat jordan. Bird is underrated.

Actually Bird won 3 consecutive three point shooting contests. Bird was an all around basketball player who attended the contests against specialists. So for him , a 6'9" rebounding forward its much more impressive than say a Craig Hodges. Reddick is remiss in not adding that

Look at SKate boarding in the 90's compared to today. Ever heard of Tony hawk? He did "The 900" in 1999. There was a 7 year old who did it like last year. Sports evolve and so do the athletes. Point being they should be compared to the players of the time they were in not to modern time.

@conduitofthegospeldarrellb9154

2 ай бұрын

The sport didn’t evolve. Someone broke the foundation of what was thought to be possible and pushed it further. Are you silly enough to argue a child is better than Tony ? The kid watched years of X sports that weren’t available to Hawk He had to CREATE/INNOVATE while execute. Not even close.

@misinfluence

2 ай бұрын

@@conduitofthegospeldarrellb9154 nope sports evolve because of better athletes/nutrition/information not because they "broke the foundation of what was possible" lmfao

@conduitofthegospeldarrellb9154

2 ай бұрын

@@misinfluence That’s my point. The sport didn’t evolve. Medicine did. Training evolved. Film study. Athletes like Hawk pushed the potential of a what was possible. Really simple shit to get. Any basic understanding of human evolution would let you know your comment is less than an intelligent stance.

@sideshowbobsaget8876

2 ай бұрын

Players from the 80s-90s played throughout the 00s-10s.

@irollerblade13

2 ай бұрын

@@sideshowbobsaget8876 I think you missed the point.

But they only talked about Jordan for like 20 seconds. What?

MJ plays Defense and gets buckets in the clutch. He would be an asset to any team in any era

The fact that no-one spoke about the differences in rules, fouls etc. Invalidates any opinions or so called facts. This era of basketball is dry as heck and the viewing figures back that up

Must Asasssshhhh have a fake seizure when me laughs?

I think JJ makes generally good points, but safe to say if Bird wanted to be the best 3 point shooter he could have done that. Maybe the facts don't merit it but the game let him take other shots more often. So his greatness is what his gen of rivals and players are balking at. Potential vs fact of a transcendent player who could will the basketball almost anywhere.

Reddixk doesn’t understand how much the rules have changed the game. scoring is a lot easier when you can carry the ball and hand check. it changes the game from a big man’s game to a guards game.

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST! WOULD YOU LET YOUR GUEST SPEAK WITHOUT CUTTING HIM OFF EVERY TIME?! HOLY FUCK!

The level of stupidity in that room is depressing.

You could project Bird as being one of the greatest three point shooters. He shot pretty well even without focusing on it as a major part of his game. Looking strictly at what was... there's no point in that. Bird coming up today would have a threeball.

The people who go after Skip Bayless for being clearly haven't listened to JJ. 😮

Don't agree with JJ dismissing that Bird would be a top 5 three point shooter in today's era. The 3 point shot was much less important and less relied upon in his era. He didn't need to practice threes nearly as much as he would have to in today's era. I think with the dependence on the 3 ball today, that Larry would've become an even better shooter and also because the game is less physical today.

The answer is Hail Naw! That gliding through the air all slow, He’d fukc around and bite his tongue off 😂.

In full context, tell how many 3s were taken back then as opposed to now.

“These browns try to take us down “ lol😂

Reddick was a role player

Reddick looks uncomfortable

Incredibly stupid to say Bird wasn’t one of the best 3pt shooters ever. Clearly his era didn’t prioritize the same approach today’s era has to shooting 3’s. However, in a 3pt shooting contest, Bird showed how good he was at shooting 3’s. Who cares if JJ can tell you what degree a player’s release point is at? How does at all imply that he was a better 3pt shooter than Bird or at all able to say who is or isn’t a good shooter? It just seems like there is a conflation between shooting volume and ability. Any player who isn’t primarily a 3pt shooter is likely to have much less 3pt shots/ game. That doesn’t speak to shooting ability

@colereviewsyt

2 ай бұрын

What would any of that have to do with his percentage? If he was that great to be called the best ever he would have a good shooting percentage. You can't say duck his percentage didn't you see that 3 point contest 😂

@playea123

2 ай бұрын

@@colereviewsyt if taking 3’s is not part of the game plan, when do you think 3’s will be taken? Likely end of play clock or Hail Mary-type situations. Whereas in a 3pt contest, the whole point is to test someone’s 3pt shooting ability, albeit in a restricted sense, which is fine to make a note of. My point is that if the era/ coaching didn’t favor 3pt shooting, the 3pt shot selection will be so vastly different than what we have today that just relying on percentage is a bad way to measure how good a shooter someone is. Also, Bird’s role on offense wasn’t a shooter role. That also adds to the type of shots he would be taking. JJ is an entertainer and has to generate views via hot takes to keep eyes on and generate money. He is doing what he has to do.

@playea123

2 ай бұрын

@@colereviewsyt if taking 3’s is not part of the game plan, when do you think 3’s will be taken? Likely end of play clock or Hail Mary-type situations. Whereas in a 3pt contest, the whole point is to test someone’s 3pt shooting ability, albeit in a restricted sense, which is fine to make a note of. My point is that if the era/ coaching didn’t favor 3pt shooting, the 3pt shot selection will be so vastly different than what we have today that just relying on percentage is a bad way to measure how good a shooter someone is. Also, Bird’s role on offense wasn’t a shooter role. That also adds to the type of shots he would be taking. JJ is an entertainer and has to generate views via hot takes to keep eyes on and generate money. He is doing what he has to do.

@colereviewsyt

2 ай бұрын

No that doesn't mean that more than likely they were taken at the end, it means they just preferred to try to get a 2 as opposed a 3. There isn't going to be any way they's absolutely perfect but percentages is a lot better than saying I won a 3 point contest. A 3 point contest there's no defense. There's no restriction, you get to have a perfect rhythm. It's the equivalent of a QB pro day..... Has nothing to do with how good a QB they really are. And JJ is far from just an entertainer. There literally isn't more than 20 people walking that has the experience and expertise of actually playing the game and taking 3 point shots..... And you are talking like he's a random guy in KZread comments that doesn't know what he's talking about. That's crazy

@playea123

2 ай бұрын

@@colereviewsyt it’s an imperfect comparison because you are comparing two incredibly different eras so the commonalities is what you gotta put the most on in terms of comparison. That would be the 3pt contest. It would be odd if Tom Brady was missing most throws during practice, but had amazing completion pct in games. Everyone who is good at shooting 3’s should do well in a 3pt contest. It would be odd if you only knew how to make 3’s when guarded but air-balled routinely when practicing alone. JJ NOW is an entertainer. He has to get eyes and ears.

JJ likes the LBJ nuts too much to say anything objective about him. He's a welp

@bench2346

2 ай бұрын

coming from a twerp

@jonjaime

Ай бұрын

Yeah he's one of those Klutz sports propagandists

To say today’s players are more athletic is 100% true. To say the players are better today is hard to measure. People forget the rules were different as today’s rules are designed to favor the offensive player and traveling and carrying aren’t enforced. Players couldn’t do that back then.

When JJ Redick is trying to say good things about Larry Bird, I just don't believe him. It seems like he doesn't believe it either. It seemed like he just want to get off the hot seat. Just my opinion.

JJ STARTED THAT SHIT.

COUSY with 80 years old at halft time in a nba game shoot 10 for 10 ft.. D.COWENS shoot 5 straight left hand FT shoots when he was 90 years old

Contrarians must consistently be on brand, lest they cease to exist.

Let's put this in perspective: In the 1980s the average 3point shooting in the NBA was 28%. Larry Birds career average was 37% that's almost 10% greater than league average. So era to era in modern basketball todays 3point average is 37% so it would be equivalent to having a 46% career average 3point shooter in today game was how good he was compared to the rest of the league. You are telling me 10% better isn't that good, Steph Curry is shooting at 5% greater average lol 🤣

JJ Redick should be ask or search about Alejandro Carmona Try High School , Ohio hahahaah He Schooled Lebron like a baby.

So according to JJ REDDICK, Draymond Green was a better 3 point shooter than Larry Bird? OK...

@user-co7yl3kr3t

2 ай бұрын

That’s not at all what he said. Are you acoustic?

@sup9542

2 ай бұрын

He didn't say it outright but he implied it and didn't caveat it. So it was a poor analysis.

@miltongarcia5637

2 ай бұрын

So you can say Bird was a 37% career 3 point shooter at a time when the league avg was about 25 to 28% but he wasn't a great 3 point shooter? You just got through saying relative to the competition then what? That doesn't count in terms of 3 point shooting?

I would love to see JJ debate Skip Bayless on this subject 😆

Furthermore, though Bird hit less 3 pointers than alot of guys today. The entire league shot less 3 pointers than they do today. I dont think Reddick truly grasps how terrifically diverse Birds skills were

@TurboFist0

Ай бұрын

Bird never practiced 3s nearly as much in his era as he would in today's era because they were never relied upon and he was still one of the greatest shooters of all time. If he played in today's era he would be practicing 3s nonstop and would probably shoot 43+% from 3 for his career.

“Well they were less good “ 😂😂😂

LET HIM TALKKK GODDAMNIT!!!

With the way they don’t play defense anymore hell yeah he would dominate. At least 30 to 40 per game.

Everything evolves...basketball...life...science...and on and on

man let him talk bro

NBA players today wouldn't make a 50's teams! The game wasn't about entertainment then it was a purest sport. They couldn't touch the ball without traveling or charging. % was lower for a reason.

The guest to host ratio is off. 4:1 is too much, JJ has to fight to get a word in when it should be the other way around.

This was a tough watch with all the interrupting

More likely than the people of this channel being able to count to five

Imagine if LeBron got to play for Dean Smith for 4 years like Jordan. Imagine if LeBron got to play for John Wooden for 4 years like Kareem. He would not have the scoring championship like now but he would have more rings

the fact the even asking, is DISRESPECTFUL! ...the sports media is getting worse!

JJ is a bit of troll. But these dudes need to let him talk and finish a sentence

4:10 Larry Bird won the three point contest three times. I think it was in three consecutive years. 4/20/24, 7:13 p.m.

It makes me want to give the 'ole "yuccckkk" again by the great Jimmy Norton on O&A when I listen to comedians interrupt a former nba player about basketball. Jesus Christ

Why even have a guest on if you don't let them talk lmao

Larry bird win a three point contest three times..and JJ had not. But he talks about bird not being a top 5 shooters..if he played back in the days..he would be unknown without social media..

So many ppl from the past would absolutely demolish records in today's nba. Jordan, bird, Reggie Miller, ray Allen, Steve Kerr, glen rice, peja, dirk....today's nba rules and officiating is 100% set up for offensive scoring and particularly 3s. No defense whatsoever. That's why stats from the past 10 years are pretty much irrelevant bc they are bloated stats that would never happen without those changes. Some players would still be great like curry, kd, etc but they wouldn't be in the record setting conversations. It's way harder to score when you can't take 3 steps and shoot it or when you have a guy on defense who is allowed to hand check you and play body to body.

Steph Curry has a 40.2% 3 point percentage, Larry had 40.6% 3 point percentage. Larry took significantly less 3's but that's because the 3 point line was new right as he entered the league as a rookie! Aside from this, 3's were heavily guarded up close if you were a 3 point sharpshooter - there was no space since hand checking and no 3 second defensive rules were present. Stating that Bird was not top 10 3 point shooter is insane. He's crush it if he was given the green light in an era where perimeter players drive and kick for the open 3. Steph's better though - don't get me wrong. Still, Larry was clearly the better player. Oh, and in terms of shooting, including 2's and especially contested 2's? Larry slaughters Steph. In terms of shooting midrange, Jordan dominates that conversation anyway. So when you discuss best shooter, you have to include 2's and 3's.

@natedowd9699

2 ай бұрын

Larry's career 3pt percentage was 37.6 not 40.6 and it does make sense he's a better mid range shooter than steph, he was 6'9 with longer reach allowing him to shoot over shorter players on contested shots. Scale steph up to 6'9" I'd take him in the mid range all day. Also in the 80's people didn't guard 3's up close whatsoever because they were seen as more of a risky shot then and there weren't as many competent shooters. Larry bird was an awesome player and could be great any era but idk if I'd put him at best shooter regardless of era, a lot of that is based on hypotheticals

@ShaShaSha534

2 ай бұрын

@@natedowd9699 Ah, my fault. I misread the stats and read his last year in the league as his "career" since career is listed at the bottom. On google (instead of basketball reference), the last year is listed on bottom.

@mj23goat3

2 ай бұрын

@@natedowd9699 "Also in the 80's people didn't guard 3's up close..." As opposed to Steph's era where nobody guards anything, up close or otherwise.

@sup9542

2 ай бұрын

​@@ShaShaSha534 Taking the last year is still actually meaningful. It shows he could have had a great % if he grew up with the 3 pt line. It just comes down to how much you practice it. Bird was almost KD height, he has a huge advantage over Steph with the release point.

@ShaShaSha534

2 ай бұрын

@@sup9542 Exactly! Imagine coming into the league as they literally creat the 3 pointer and you're already crushing it. Steph grew up with the 3 point line. Bird is one of the greatest shooters ever. He had a stretch of 4 years where he was .920-950 from the free throw line, which is insane.

Greatness is always relative to competition. Sure Tracy McGrady would be better than most players but thats not how it works. In the olympics the 100m sprinters today are better than everybody in history but they arent greater.

Constant interruption AND a Clickbate Header? Come on flagrant 😤

jj willingly ignores birds game winners and go ahead shots that make him better than jj overall

@matthewmarois235

28 күн бұрын

Wait, are you comparing the two or think they’re even in the same stratosphere??!! Redick was a role player who’s teams went nowhere

Its a silly argument as modern players are learning the skills of the previous generations. Cars or phones computers etc improve over time. But you cant tell a e type jaguar isnt a classic

Can JJ play 15 seasons in the 90's, NOOO! smh "based in fact" not at all...

Maybe he'll be a better coach than a player😂

Trying to listen to JJ talk and Andrew has to interrupt nonstop to let us all know how much he doesn’t care or know about basketball. Unbelievable.

Looks like an adult talking to a bunch of annoying kids

This is when JJ loses it , he tries to be too honest and makes the game about numbers and not about actual players

Bob cousy would get smoked by division 3 players today. The sport has evolved so much.

So funny EVERYONE on this set is wearing fake hair.

JJ never won a 3 point contest wow

I don’t know why this guy is relevant. He was a role player . He doesn’t even know he’s getting trolled by these comedians.