I like to imagine they both just declare war on each other and do nothing. Leave all the other countries very confused.

@brijekavervix7340

3 жыл бұрын

It's just a ruse to trick the Chinese ;P

@mikicerise6250

3 жыл бұрын

I like to imagine Australia send in the emus and Japan sues for peace.

@backpackpepelon3867

3 жыл бұрын

Australia gonna get their arses kicked, they aint winning against japan 1v1 for sure. There's like only 10 country that can duel japan nowdays

@getstuffed2391

3 жыл бұрын

@@backpackpepelon3867 no body would win the Japanese couldn’t successfully control a supply line to an invading force on the coast of Australia. Result is the same if any other countries tried. Australia would sink the supply vessels forcing a surrender of the invading force, best bet would to simply bomb the coast but everything inland would be out of range. If anyone tried the same to Japan it would be the same scenario but less inland protection. Australia is simply to big for one country to invade while Japan has a advantages geographical advantage as well using the shallow waters for choke points

@brijekavervix7340

3 жыл бұрын

@@backpackpepelon3867 I take it you didn't watch the video?

Please do New Zealand vs Iceland: It's the epic showdown everyone is waiting for.

@Kromsmitesyou

3 жыл бұрын

Good one lol. NZ would smoke iceland as iceland has no army and just a coast guard of 3 small ships.

@brightonbegole5459

3 жыл бұрын

Oh my God yes

@johnr797

3 жыл бұрын

NORFOLK V PITCAIRN THE BATTLE WITH THE PADDLE COMMOTION IN THE OCEAN

@fvo911

3 жыл бұрын

Iceland does not have an army… it is protected by the USA

@von8834

3 жыл бұрын

Erwin Rommel held troops from New Zealand in high regard .

2:54 Japan: OMAEE!!! Australia: ʇunɔ ᴉO *stares at each other menacingly but nothing happens*

@austingregory8041

3 жыл бұрын

How did you write upside down

@EpicMRPancake

3 жыл бұрын

@@austingregory8041 You'll need an Australian visa, they're pretty hard to get but there's guides online.

@JRyan-lu5im

3 жыл бұрын

@@austingregory8041 Be Australian obviously

@orenzien6039

3 жыл бұрын

@@austingregory8041 use vpn, pick Australia

@wiryantirta

3 жыл бұрын

@@austingregory8041 set your VPN to australia

Japan: Ok why are we doing this again? Australia: This is dumb. Indonesia: Guys, cut it out!

@Nafuttoid

3 жыл бұрын

Me indonesian: no no no, japan carry on! *TENNO HENKA BANZAI!*

@EpicMRPancake

3 жыл бұрын

It could be like that scene in Pirates of the Carribean 3 where the Flying Dutchman and Black Pearl suddenly both turn to engage the Endeavour - Here having the meaning of China.

@madmarvshighwaywarrior2870

3 жыл бұрын

Philippines: *grabs popcorn* Also too busy dealing with China.

@HavanaSyndrome69

3 жыл бұрын

Australia vs China is N to the millionth power more likely than Australia vs Japan and even China won't have the ability to do something like that ever evenif their current capabilities continue to move forward at their current trajectory. Russia is interested in reasserting dominance in the regions formerly controlled by the USSR. Japan is interested in repelling the advancing regional power of China. And China is interested in becoming a true super power based on economic and military dominance by what they see as their racial superiority.

@EpicMRPancake

3 жыл бұрын

@@HavanaSyndrome69 True, but just remember that these videos are not looking to simulate likely confrontations, they're just arena matches for military hardware, personnel and national productivity/endurance.

This'd play out like a Civ game, the AI would declare war on you then proceed to do absolutely nothing for 30 turns.

@nervsouly

3 жыл бұрын

Haha so true.

@Slideways1989

3 жыл бұрын

Nice pfp

@altair1323

3 жыл бұрын

Yo buddy still alive?

@iamaloafofbread8926

3 жыл бұрын

Making you confused and annoyed than anything.

@paulk4446

2 жыл бұрын

then offer you a peace treaty expecting 5 of your cites in return

JMSDF "We are literally called the self defense force sir" Binkov "Whatever, Let's invade the Emus"

@TheAdriyaman

3 жыл бұрын

*kangaroos

@villepusa3830

3 жыл бұрын

I mean "Finnish defence forces" and we attacked soviet union. And U.S defence department has invaded almost everyone.

@bittersweet7145

3 жыл бұрын

Emus: So they're back for more eh?

@captain61games49

3 жыл бұрын

@@bittersweet7145 they never went away

@user-ro9zf9kz1h

3 жыл бұрын

Australia have activated the E.M.U defense system. Japan: Oh well guess it will be New Ze..........land New Zealand with bob semple: Finally a worthy opponent. Our battle will be legendary.

Logistics would be a pain in the ass for both sides

@hammerandpickle7390

3 жыл бұрын

@@nanochad2979 no I'm pretty sure it would be a pain in the ass for us

@abhishekkulkarni9120

3 жыл бұрын

@@hammerandpickle7390 The distance from Australian mainland to islands is vast. It's a logistical nightmare for any nation except US.

@RK-cj4oc

3 жыл бұрын

@@abhishekkulkarni9120 It is also a nightmare for them. They however have the current resources to solve and make it work. Which is fucking insane. US militairy always impresses me

@abhishekkulkarni9120

3 жыл бұрын

@@RK-cj4oc You think Aussies can solve the logistical problems or they let Emus and Cossowaries take care of the Japanese.

@RK-cj4oc

3 жыл бұрын

@@abhishekkulkarni9120 I am prett certain the Japanese would not dare to land on a land with crazy wildlife as Australia. so yeah they would not even have that problem.

One thing you forgot to mention about the Japanese armed forces: they have been busy the last ~70 years defending the islands from Godzilla. Therefore, they do have much experience with fighting against something outside their class and facing insurmountable odds.

@bigbrowntau

3 жыл бұрын

But we have emus, and a lack of water.

@dan7564

3 жыл бұрын

"If you count failure as experience" Japanese Loki "I count experience as experience"

@davidrutherford6311

2 жыл бұрын

Every time the Aussie soldiers do bush/outback training they are outnumbered by all the venomous/ poisonous and just plain vicious animals that live there. So the Japanese have more experience in massed manoeuvre combat, while Australian troops have more experience against sneaky more numerous foes.

@robertdocherty2340

2 жыл бұрын

After dolly the cloned sheep and years of abuse being called Pommie Bs*. A big ship is on route to Japan carrying an enhanced gorilla think he’s called Kong to help quell the lizard infestation 😉

@no2party

2 жыл бұрын

Don't forget their Mecha battalions and Magical Girl brigades.

"wanna go to war with Australia?" "sure why not lol" 1-3 years later "wait...why did we go to war with Australia?" "erm...I..uh..I don't know..." "wanna make peace?" "sure why not lmao" -the war cabinet of japan probably, maybe

@gillettematch3188

3 жыл бұрын

that just sounds like that battle where a roman army was suddenly fighting against the parthians until the romans began asking themselves what the fuck where they trying to accomplish by fighting the parthians then they just apologize, gave them money and withdraw from those lands

Japan has already invaded Australia. I'm sure there are more sushi bars in Australia than Australian pubs in Japan.

@JD-wf2hu

3 жыл бұрын

Going for the cultral victory

@tigeriontigerion9112

3 жыл бұрын

Not a few British pub is here.

@1FatLittleMonkey

2 жыл бұрын

Not to mention their secret weapon: Japanese tourists.

@AUmarcus

2 жыл бұрын

They bombed Darwin....they never invaded. Got spanked before they got the chance.

@elkiwi69

2 жыл бұрын

@@AUmarcus Incorrect some Japanese did land on Australian soil.. kzread.info/dash/bejne/X3t8ycyIm820gdI.html

What happens when a US ally who’s built their military around peace keeping and fighting in a coalition fights a US ally who’s built a military around defending against peer competitors and regional sea control. The answer: not much

@wiryantirta

3 жыл бұрын

man we need like a Red Flag but for combined air land sea combat. 2v2 or something. Just to satisfy us fucking basement armchair generals.

@knoahbody69

3 жыл бұрын

@Bobo Mbutu That was the IJN. The U.S. Sub Fleet was successful in sinking Japanese shipping between the islands. This inability to keep this far flung "empire" connected by sea was why Japan was eventually defeated.

@stanielsoncoochiesmellehsm6114

2 жыл бұрын

Unless you are 🇬🇧 or 🇦🇷

@robman2095

2 жыл бұрын

@Bobo Mbutu sure but everybody knows that including the guy making the video. The intended value (if any, apart from amusement) is presumably in going through the various tactical options and relevant considerations and how they affect the progress and outcome of the campaign. Maybe there is something there to be learned that could be applied in a more realistic scenario.

Two cats hissing at each other through a closed window.

@seymourbutts4654

2 жыл бұрын

someone still has to clean the window afterwards what a mess

ROK, Japan and USA vs DPRK, China and Russia Feat. Second Korean War EU vs OIC(Organization of Islamic Cooperation) Feat. Another Crusade War ASEAN VS China Feat. Myanmar Civil War

@jimmyb7479

3 жыл бұрын

You forgot about south Korea in the second Korean war

@subtitleaddict5343

3 жыл бұрын

@@jimmyb7479 ROK is South Korea

@juicymango8785

3 жыл бұрын

@@jimmyb7479 Republic Of Korea

@amireyvazi9251

3 жыл бұрын

Rok Japan USA win EU destroys

@jollywyrm5684

3 жыл бұрын

EU isnt Christian anymore its either Islamic or Atheist.

australia would use the same tactics they used in kokoda, russia used the same against germany..... retreat till your enemy cant handle supply pressure

@willam1992

3 жыл бұрын

And long term guerrilla warfare

@hahahahah8396

2 жыл бұрын

The Cambodian use it against the Vietnamese as well and it worked

@happyraider815

2 жыл бұрын

whats stoppin the japan from doing the same? you are an i**** name bruce definitely checks out.

Being an Aussie, it breaks my heart how complacent the government has been over the past few decades in fortifying and defending our country.

@maxcleghorn

3 жыл бұрын

id rather the money be spent on infrastructure and social programs tbh

@willam1992

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah we would easy have the money for that and all the social programs and infrastructure we wanted if there was not so much waste of funds. From all levels of government

@AndyViant

2 жыл бұрын

@@maxcleghorn The first responsibility of a federal government is the protection and care of its citizens. Infrastructure and social programs are useless if you cannot defend your land and citizens. Not to say they are not important. Just to say that you can't say you will do one without the other. The new century, or at least the way the 2020's are shaping up suggests that we have underspent, and more importantly let our production capabilities atrophy in a dangerous way. What we really need to do is develop domestic capability, but our federal government seems to prefer outsourcing to potential threats such as communist china than developing skills because of fear of domestic unionization. Go figure.

@Legiion513

2 жыл бұрын

@@maxcleghorn What good are social programs when another nation conquers you?

@markcoroneos7811

2 жыл бұрын

And its not like we even need a massive military to defend ourselves, just a well constructed one. It hurts seeing how poorly defended the country really is. Bloody governments 😑

Japan: Invades Australia: "Conscript the Emus" *Victory*

@dapperfield595

2 жыл бұрын

“Emu Revolt” *Oh Fuck*

Both Australia and Japan should keep building up their militaries. And just want to say, I do like Japan as an Australian

@missk1697

3 жыл бұрын

no

@dan7564

3 жыл бұрын

They already are.

@Joshua_N-A

3 жыл бұрын

What about that AUD90 billion dollar submarine project?

@dan7564

3 жыл бұрын

@Semih Sahin I don't think it's about getting Australia to the point it can Threaten China. I think it's more about making it costly and hard for China to get a foot hold. Putting aside Binkov's 1v1 a-political scenario's.

@CheapCheerful

3 жыл бұрын

Yep, Japan is cool. Its where all the good stuff is made! :-)

Australia: "Right, time to dig up those F-111's!"

@VisibilityFoggy

3 жыл бұрын

There's a low-key debate going on right now about potentially selling Australia the USAF's B-1B bombers when the B-21 is fielded.

@MY-zj8pb

3 жыл бұрын

@@VisibilityFoggy waste of money. Rather them spend money on more fighters

@coreymicallef365

3 жыл бұрын

@@VisibilityFoggy And analysts in Australia are suggesting our air force should seriously consider buying our own B-21s www.aspistrategist.org.au/b-21-bomber-could-be-australias-best-long-range-strike-option/

@robertbrazier5097

3 жыл бұрын

I live in Australia and the B-1B is my favourite plane but I do also understand how the issues regarding maintenance time and cost could affect us purchasing them.

@robman2095

2 жыл бұрын

@Bobo Mbutu do they teach bullying and threatening at school in china? You and your leaders seem so good at it. 😂

So basically, a tie. Either way, Australia 🇦🇺 and Japan 🇯🇵 are very close allies since ww2, so I highly doubt they’d ever go to war again 🇯🇵🇦🇺🇯🇵🇦🇺🇯🇵🇦🇺🇯🇵🇦🇺

@Exxperiment626

3 жыл бұрын

Let be real, If Japan changed their defensive mindset, it wouldnt be much of a fight.

@IC3XR

3 жыл бұрын

@Brett Mitchell wrong buddy

@user-rf9mx4qf7z

3 жыл бұрын

@Brett Mitchell news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6444207.stm Short of a full alliance/mutual defense treaty like both have with the US, but in any case it's quite clear that both Japan and Australia regard the others as important partners and friends, even if there isn't a piece of paper saying "we're allies".

@user-rf9mx4qf7z

3 жыл бұрын

@Brett Mitchell Words have meanings. Sometimes words have different meanings to different people :-) The term "ally" isn't too precisely defined. I quote one definition (from Wikipedia): "An alliance is a relationship among people, groups, or states that have joined together for mutual benefit or to achieve some common purpose, whether or not explicit agreement has been worked out among them." In this sense, Australia and Japan are definitely allies. FWIW, Wikipedia also considers the RAA between Australia and Japan a military alliance. If Wikipedia isn't authoritative enough for you, the US government defines a number of countries as "major non-NATO allies" without necessarily having mutual defence treaties. You're using a very narrow definition and one that isn't generally accepted.

@lukeaus

3 жыл бұрын

@Brett Mitchell not yet but it's currently in negotiation.

Australia's biggest advantage is its size. Japan could easily destroy Australia's navy, but the logistics of conquering and holding the mainland would be downright impossible.

@hurgcat

3 жыл бұрын

It is also a huge hinderance, Australia is essentially 12 or 13 city states strung out along the coast of an entire content. Cut the string at a few points, it would likely cause mass starvation. Hungry people capitulate pretty quickly.

@compatriot852

3 жыл бұрын

Australia would have to pull a Russia by retreating into the interior wilderness. Only problem is that it's more inhospitable than Siberia

@oblivioneagle3464

3 жыл бұрын

@@compatriot852 The fact that in land Australia is just desert what's stopping japan from using satellites to just find large army formations

@BagoPorkRinds

3 жыл бұрын

The Emu horde is Australia's greatest asset. The Japanese will have no chance holding any territory for long.

@murkywateradminssions5219

3 жыл бұрын

if I were to choose between ANY modern MBT or an Emu *i would choose the emu without any hesitation*

Japan would be able to push back the Australian navy due to Japans navy being much larger but being a defense nation means they would not have enough manpower to invade Australia. This is my guess before watching the video.

@Averageyoutubeenjoyerr

3 жыл бұрын

There should be a video on USA, Japan,ROK, Australia, Taiwan,ASEAN, India UK, European union vs Russia,China,Iran, Mongolia, North Korea and all the countries having stan at the end of their names.

@anoobyproaz5616

3 жыл бұрын

The navy's American tho, i doubt the us would fight australia

@demun6065

3 жыл бұрын

@@Averageyoutubeenjoyerr Russia is on the verge of becoming neutral towards USA vs China soon. Maybe even one day, they'll become an ally.

@vetabeta9890

3 жыл бұрын

They have 250k men

@bobbymitchell9747

3 жыл бұрын

@@vetabeta9890 all Japan would have to do is set it on fire

Japan would never invade Australia. The Emu overlords would rise up and oppose them.

@TheAsakararen

3 жыл бұрын

and the many divisions of drop bears

@Joshua_N-A

3 жыл бұрын

Unless Japan pull a 40K. TENNO HEIKA BANZAI!! MIKADO PROTECTS!!

@mnd7381

3 жыл бұрын

@GN M what deaths in Darwin?

@mnd7381

3 жыл бұрын

@GN MFirst of all, this section was comedic. Secondly the Australia and Japan of 1942 aren't there anymore, they're allies now. They both have US support. They won't fight without a coalition. Their main enemy is China, who I don't think would be able to bomb Australia against all coalition like the old Japan of 1942. You seem more from an enemy country of Australia xD

It's cool when a war can't happen because no player has the capacities to actually go through with it

@Illianor123

3 жыл бұрын

Two distant island nations with defensive focussed militaries. Not much happens.

With the current Australian government I dare say the Japanese military would have more support from the Australian people then the Australian

@Hoot_hoot777

3 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately, I second that

@ironsideeve2955

3 жыл бұрын

Half the federal budget increases end up overseas so I’d say the government isn’t for the people, it’s for multinational corporations.

@ronhar1412

3 жыл бұрын

basically any country (thats not china) would be welcomed to annexing Aus for the sake of ridding our government

@looinrims

3 жыл бұрын

Seems like the whole Australia is the utopia of the world isn’t holding up

@snakethepeg7828

2 жыл бұрын

Aus military is mainly hiring women right now to be less discriminate... As we can see from the past that always works well..

Australia can seize Japanese whaling vessels in Antarctica as hostages.

@leexingha

3 жыл бұрын

Japan can also take hostage the Aussie soldiers whose inhumanely killing Afghan

@liamlawman7683

3 жыл бұрын

@@leexingha old news mate

@commanderdark3399

3 жыл бұрын

@@leexingha we pulled out....like ages ago

@leexingha

3 жыл бұрын

@@commanderdark3399 u, guys, are fast on making lame excuses. anyways, i hate japanese and i also hate hypocrites like you, guys

@leexingha

3 жыл бұрын

@@liamlawman7683 sure, 6 months is old new (kzread.info/dash/bejne/jJqcl9SAndDbetI.html)

Serious Question : Will Binkov one day make an hour video on a modern WW3 scenario? This question has been in my mind since 2017 lol

@dan7564

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, every time I see a video I think, but how would things play out in 10 years and 20 years? In this video for example. Both Australia and Japan are in the middle of massively upgrading their military due to China's looming threat. The new proposed Australian Frigates are bigger than our destroyers and in theory sound quite capable. Likewise Australia is trying to upgrade it's submarine fleet from the 9 mediocre Collins class to 12 of the new bigger French Subs, which they went with because they wanted regional superiority over japan (Sub Briefs Channel has a really good run down of this). I can't remember off the top of my head Japans orders, but I'm sure it's a shot in the arm too. So I'd like to know, even if it was at the end of the video if much would change in 15 years or so. Even if it was a rough guess.

@Binkov

3 жыл бұрын

Isn't the whole channel basically one huge WW3 scenario? :)

@dan7564

3 жыл бұрын

@@Binkov Hi Binkov, if you are short on match up ideas. Could you do "Could Canzuk defend Britain if it was prepared for the EU to Invade it?

@dreamhunter2973

2 жыл бұрын

@@Binkov sir, can you do one on the QUAD(India,US, Japan, Australia) vs China naval showdown!!!

@nanochad2979

2 жыл бұрын

@Bobo Mbutu you realise that many more would have died if the atomic bomb's weren't dropped, what about the ughyer genocide, what about the independence of hong kong? why don't you question the propaganda you are force fed?

Been waiting along time for this 😁

Looking forward to the next chilling imminent scenario: Can 120 million nematodes team up and beat a giraffe in a game of canasta?

Australia DOES have an army reserve numbering around 30,000 members.

@AndyViant

2 жыл бұрын

and a decent size naval reserve too

@Nano606606

2 жыл бұрын

Dont forget the reason we dont have satellites for surveillance - Its because we comprise one arm of the 5 eyes club and have access to the entire American and UK satellite network. Plus if it came to dire straights and we were losing the country - A couple of B-52's would take off from Nevada and deliver some Hydrogen bombs to our shores (thats why we allow US troops at pine gap - Its part of the agreement). We also have the capability of obtaining our own nuclear weapons in 90 days (using the Lucas heights reactor) and our abundant Uranium as a source for the bombs. Hell, give me 90 days, a few lathes, some explosives and a heap of refined Uranium and i could build a bomb based on the 'gun type' nuclear bomb designs. All we need is 43kg's of Uranium, which we could get easily from one of the many mines up up north.

@pattyb6003

2 жыл бұрын

@@Nano606606 I would just throw beer cans at em.

@egg-iu3fe

Жыл бұрын

i might be joining the reserves

Our indomitable emu legions vs the impeccable running and maintenance of the shinkansen (bullet trains) should have been explored more in this scenario :)

Love the videos!

Idk man, can't really expect NZ not to assist our Aussie brothers XD

@nickwebster1980

3 жыл бұрын

Sure they might beat us Aussies, but if they think they can beat the All Blacks they're in for a rude awakening.

@stanielsoncoochiesmellehsm6114

3 жыл бұрын

⚔🇬🇧 🇨🇦 🇦🇺 🇳🇿 ⚔

Japan: Tatakae !! Australian spiders: cute.

Australia almost bought the latest Japanese submarines, but went for the French design instead (due to lobbying). That would be a awkward scenerio if Australia was getting delivery of Japanese subs just before this hypothetical war. Of course Japanese subs have been in Sydney Harbour - historically.

@ComaDave

3 жыл бұрын

I did all the sums a couple of weeks ago. For the same price as we're paying for these subs (AUD90 billion), we could have bought 3 Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers, and a dozen off-the-shelf USN Virginia-class nukesubs...and have more than enough money left over to outfit everything, including F-35B's for the carriers. I'm probably too old to be here for whenever the next war kicks off (and it will), but just like in the 1930's...our successive complacent and myopic governments will end up costing us dearly.

@w0mblemania

3 жыл бұрын

Australia's defence policies over the last half century have been criminally stupid. The Collins Submarines have been a waste of untold billions. The F-35 is an extremely overpriced underperformer. And now Australia is buying more... tanks. Yes, tanks. Because that's what will stop an Indonesian or Chinese assault...

@AndyViant

2 жыл бұрын

You mean blatant corruption rather than lobbying. A decision that is further on the treason scale than Benedict Arnold yet no one even lost their job.

@currawong60911368

2 жыл бұрын

@@ComaDave Hold my beer.....

Love your videos,include URUGUAY in the next one;), thank you!

The episode I never knew I needed

@robman2095

2 жыл бұрын

You didn’t 😂

I could just see how happy China would be at Japan getting a hold of all Australia's Iron Ore and Bauxite.

Reiterates the importance of the Australian and Japanese alliance. We really compliment one another from a military perspective and extremely glad they are an Aly and close friend. Plus, we need to keep the Japanese beer supply, those guys know how to make beer and Katsu Curry.

I'd love to see Canada and Denmark duking it out over Hans Island in a full-on war. Regardless, I love your videos, always fascinating!

@JollyOldCanuck

3 жыл бұрын

If Finland, Sweden, and Norway remain neutral Canada will probably win due to our larger population and economy (can put more funds towards building an army).

@Eskay1206

3 жыл бұрын

I'd like to see The Vatican vs China in a full on war of propaganda and bullshit

@danielpaterson6824

3 жыл бұрын

@@JollyOldCanuck true, if it turns into a multi-year war it would be pretty one sided. So let's add some Binkov-style restrictions and say it's only a one year conflict, no outside help, thus limiting it to currently available equipment. The Canadian and Danish airforces have a rough parity and while the Canadian Navy is larger and has subs (kinda), the Danish navy remains debatably newer and more potent (while the RCN waits for the Type 26). The question would be which is better suited for an Arctic role. The Canadian army is a lot bigger, but it wouldn't really be as big a factor in the conflict over the island. Maybe I'm making a mountain out of a molehill, but I think it would be interesting to see a Binkov deep dive into!

1:42 Australia's army is not an "after-thought" bro. 90% of Australian military activity has been on land through history......

@JollyOldCanuck

3 жыл бұрын

Commonwealth countries are known more for their mechanized infantry rather than their navy or Air Force (excluding the UK which has a sizeable navy and Air Force).

@chefgav1

3 жыл бұрын

Yes good point

@robman2095

2 жыл бұрын

Australia’s defence strategy for the defence of the mainland is clearly to defend the air-sea gap with the air force and navy first. For example if China wanted to invade Australia we would not have to fight 2 million Chinese soldiers. We would only have to fight the number that managed to get to Australia via the air sea gap. However once they got a foothold in Australia then we would have to fight up to 2 million. That is what he meant about the army being an afterthought (which was perhaps a poor choice of words). Priority in strategy is to stop the enemy getting here in the first place. We have not yet fought a land campaign on our own soil and we don’t want to have to do that because we would only be doing that if we had lost control of our air and sea approaches, in which case the invader with essentially unlimited numbers and resources would be able to resupply indefinitely until they obtained victory.

@elmar541

2 жыл бұрын

@@robman2095 Yea I know I did watch the video too. Its still not an afterthought. It is really an advanced, capable, and historically-proven army ready to fight on, or off, our own soil

@robman2095

2 жыл бұрын

@@elmar541 Yes I did appreciate that was your point of view and I agree completely

I'm certain there is a mutual assistance security treaty between Australia and japan. Certainly edging more towards Allies than enemy in real terms history is violent but the future is bright for the 2 countries together,

@CheapCheerful

3 жыл бұрын

Yep, Aussies love Japan man. That WW2 stuff is ancient history. We'd go defend Japan from invasion if they asked for our help.

I said before even watching this would be one boring war their lack of power projection makes a real conflict not even worth it. It would be the “I bet you won’t come here and say that” war

@mnd7381

3 жыл бұрын

Both have decent weapons though, but not made for attacking one another so far. And they're allies

@mnd7381

3 жыл бұрын

@GN M do you think Australia needs a large standing army? Less population, less needs. They don't have enemies at their border. And they are not expansionist to even get involved in a conflict alone. They will fight with allies, always. Even they are geographically isolated, Aussies and Kiwis, with the US and NATO in support

@mnd7381

3 жыл бұрын

@GN M I guess the punchline is china is taking over businesses? Can't see a 20 min video now .... But business is upto a limit dude. They still are part of the Anglosphere and will support the NATO during a conflict. Everyone wants money, but during war, this business will not be there

@Philbyyyy

3 жыл бұрын

@GN M you think the rest of the world will let China attack Australia and not come help?

@mnd7381

3 жыл бұрын

@GN M yup?

Blinkov's Battlegrounds' countries are like: Country 1: 😐 Country 2: 😐 1 day later... Country 1 and 2: How dare you! *Starts attacking each other*

Australia punches well above it's weight when it comes to military and economy

@markcoroneos7811

2 жыл бұрын

@Bobo Mbutu 😂😂 care to provide a source for that??

@bahadir7677

2 жыл бұрын

@@markcoroneos7811 Are you asking for a source regarding Australia's colonial past? srsly? It is almost as absurd as asking for a source regarding the roundness of earth.

@markcoroneos7811

2 жыл бұрын

@@bahadir7677 stole the land? Yeah blame the brits for that one buddy - it was their idea 😂 criminals? Well originally yes, people sent here who were prisoners with no say in the matter. Australia has dark parts to its history, just like every other nation dude. Which country are you from and we can talk about the shady parts of that history 🤷🏻‍♂️

@bahadir7677

2 жыл бұрын

@@markcoroneos7811 Why are u getting too defensive over this? He just pointed out a fact which you just got so bumfucked over. Get over it, Australia has a colonial past and u dont need to ask for source to know that.

@markcoroneos7811

2 жыл бұрын

@@bahadir7677 mmm yes im the one thats butthurt obviously 😂 in case the laughy faces didnt tip you off, me asking for a source was a joke. Get over it.

Next up, Australia vs Canada. The epic saga of which army can be most nice and say sorry to other party, the most.

@yerlocalpeanutdealer795

3 жыл бұрын

That would be interesting ngl

@uraniumcranium2613

3 жыл бұрын

Canadian: Im not your guy, buddy. Australian: Im not your buddy, mate.

@robman2095

2 жыл бұрын

I don’t think aus are known for saying sorry, but wokism is another story, laying waste to the country.

@aniksamiurrahman6365

2 жыл бұрын

@@robman2095 Trust me, ideals are all just ruse. No idealist - left or right, are just "all talk and no walk". Now my point is, no country is ever lead astrey by "just talk". So if you are concerned abt ur nation, concentrate on what people are doing. What "work" is leading it ashtray. Treat probelms and problems and if u r interested, go and do the "necessary walk" to solve them. Don't just shit on social media.

Australia’s greatest weapon: geographical isolation.

@pauldonvito6169

2 жыл бұрын

Shhhhh... Don't tell EVERYONE!!

Nice animation

Wasn't expecting this

Do small countries such as El Salvador vs Honduras.

@Jack-jz4ls

3 жыл бұрын

Soccer war 2

@reentrysfs6317

3 жыл бұрын

What about hundirás vs nicaragua

@ishaanmathur2653

3 жыл бұрын

@@reentrysfs6317 Niger vs Nicaragua

@abcdpqrs1281

3 жыл бұрын

@@ishaanmathur2653 nwords Vs nwords.

@abcdpqrs1281

3 жыл бұрын

@Semih Sahin what do you mean?

*Fighting between Quad Alliances* China & Russia: "Grab popcorn"

@davidmoss2576

2 жыл бұрын

A China and Russian alliance would be disaster for the world. Russian pushing west would force the US to commit vast resources. The EU is not prepared to deal with the Russians. The Chinese would make quick work of Taiwan and focus on Japan. The N.K would unleashed on the South and more US could lose our footing their too. Arab nations would likely seize the opportunity to attack Israel. A real world war would break out.

0:53 While I didn't listen to it via audible (I listened to it via an audiobook from a library), I can confirm it is an interesting and informative read if you're interested in learning about the Vietnam war and want to know more about the Australian perspective.

Do wars that might actually happen. Like a limited objective war between China and the SE Asia sea nations.. with/without the US

@josephstalin9604

3 жыл бұрын

Without American support for SE Asia. China has the capability to destroy the whole SE Asia alone. Because of its massive navy and air force.

@mxn1948

3 жыл бұрын

Why? The Chinese coast guard alone outweighs the combined navies of all sea nations. Without the us, it's just a turkey shoot for china.

12 sek new record :)

Am I the only one that noticed one of Japan's helicopter carriers is called Hyuga class?!

@rocket_sensha4337

3 жыл бұрын

No coincidence. They'll be naming all their future aircraft. . . Helicopter carriers after the past ones. In fact many of modern japan vessels carry the namesake of ww2 ones.

@fluffly3606

2 жыл бұрын

@@rocket_sensha4337, That's because they have thematic naming schemes--like the USN used to have (nudge, nudge)--and there are only so many prefectures, provinces, mountains, types of moon, types of wind, etc. Then again, the only people they're fooling with the "Self-Defence Force" pseudonym are themselves...

You really need to do an Iceland vs Costa Rica war. San Marino vs Nauru would be another good one.

@binkov's battlegrounds Would it be possible that you can do a potential P-51D vs Me262? Thanks 👍🏿

For the vast majority of nations fighting an attacking war one on one across a large distance means losing. The US, UK, France, China and Russia are the only real exceptions to that rule in order of force projection capability.

@user-rf9mx4qf7z

3 жыл бұрын

Even Russia doesn't really have the same capability that the USSR did, it's not a major focus for them. E.g. 1 outdated aircraft carrier. They should still have enough to beat Australia though.

@tigeriontigerion9112

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, just Today.

As an Australian, I'd say Japan is the most trusted country in Asia among Australians.

@kevinar7837

Жыл бұрын

I'd trust the South Koreans too

China: Do it ! Do it ! Japan & Australia: Hahaha, You wish !

Seeing this video a year later and am amazed how much in this equation has changed.

Do a video on a potential Asian NATO led by the US, Japan, India, and Australia!

@kristoferalexander7559

3 жыл бұрын

So... The already existing QUAD? lol.

@knoahbody69

3 жыл бұрын

@@kristoferalexander7559 IKR? I guess youtubers don't have news feeds.

@kristoferalexander7559

3 жыл бұрын

@@knoahbody69 Must be Gen Z 😂

make one on QUAD vs China

Blinkov could you do an episode were you explain what type of a military alliance the common wealth is if it even is a military alliance at all, I've always heard that the military's of countries in the common wealth swear to the Queen and that she has authority over them. Does this mean that If one common wealth nation goes to war all its allies join ? This would be an interesting topic to explain. If anyone knows something about this and could help me out it would be great. Great episode as usual blinkov

Why aren't the giant robots of the JSDF and their vast experience fighting against Godzilla mentioned in this video? XD Still, great video.

Aren't those Japanese "helicopter" carriers are designed and capable of carrying F-35's? It would change the level of power projection by Japan.

@j2m3_raiden5

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah they are being modified to being able to carry F35s.

Do if countries try to reclaim there empire like France or the British

@letssuperfuntime

3 жыл бұрын

Baguette or shepherds pie.

@gillettematch3188

3 жыл бұрын

the british would be murderstomped by everyone else.

@rashadbell822

3 жыл бұрын

@@gillettematch3188 they might beat Malta lol

@villepusa3830

3 жыл бұрын

One by one - possible. All at once - impossible

Tuvalu vs Morocco I feel like would be a pretty epic clash

it is amazing how few know about the Aussie involvement in Vietnam. :(

🇯🇵💕🇦🇺

I think even today, JP still has more powerful military forces than Aus.

@jeffy5020

2 жыл бұрын

Japan is the one who can fight US, Aus is much weaker

@user-ci7vu7eo9w

2 жыл бұрын

of course japan is stronger than aus.japan invest in millitary now becouse of china not aus.even aus do it becouse of china

Egypt vs Ethiopia Dam Crisis, we've been asking for this for so many months come on already

Suggestion- the Nordic countries versus the UK and Ireland.

@hamsterbacke5962

3 жыл бұрын

Nordic countries easy. Uk dosnt habe an real army and their air force is quit small. Just 160 fighter jets and 148 tanks. Sweden alone has 90 jets and 120 tanks. On the sea te royal navy might win but on the other fronts, no Way.

Japan and australia are allies

You know that meme of the man and the woman looking at each other from their cars as they drive past each other? Yeah that but with RAAF and JASDF pilots in their F-35s.

When will the Binkov plushies be available again? Asking for a friend.

It’d be very interesting if you revisited this topic but it was instead Japan invading Australia during WW2, how would this change things?

Looks like Japan's military is geared more to attack North Korea and China. It looks like Australia's military is geared more to attack China LOL common theme there.

@mnd7381

3 жыл бұрын

Of course they're allies. Did you see the QUAD thing? USA, Japan, India, Australia, they all want the same thing And also not just attack alone, I don't think Australia will attack anywhere without allies. They'll always have support

@chrisdelzell8467

3 жыл бұрын

Funny that. You know it seems like India's military is geared mainly for defending against Pakistan or China , Pakistan's army is geared mainly for attacking India or China, South Korea's army is geared for defending against North Korea or China, and Russia's army is leftovers from when it acted like China. Almost like there's one very specific obstacle to world peace.

@mnd7381

3 жыл бұрын

@@chrisdelzell8467 Pakistan's military is more on defending I'd say, and India's to attacking Pak lol. And also what about the western military? US is involved almost everywhere, they're geared for everything it seems. And what do you mean by leftovers?

@rodneyfranks2726

3 жыл бұрын

@@chrisdelzell8467 Good Point!

@rodneyfranks2726

3 жыл бұрын

@@mnd7381 America's defense is offense. Like Bobby Fischer playing chess ♟️

Australia has satelite intelligence capability, it's somewhat brand new

@sovietsheep5051

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, this episode was not fact checked very well!

@robman2095

2 жыл бұрын

Australia had no satellites in this scenario because they get most of what they need through the US alliance. While we will increasingly launch our own satellites for our specific needs we also get far more information from the US then we could ever afford to provide for ourselves. Binkov does not make allowance for that because assistance from third parties is not allowed. But that just makes his analysis even more flawed and unrealistic as this satellite information would play a vital role in the outcome.

@least5560

Жыл бұрын

Its not though, Honestly i stopped watching after he said Australia has no satellite capabilities Its called Pine Gap - Its a satellite surveillance base smackdab in the middle of Australia, Its operated by the US and AUS governments and its been operational for over 50 years, I has multiple Orion Satellites connected to it that are synced and cover slightly over half the entire planet including the entirety of the European continent/Asian continent/African continent, I would agree to not include if it was solely a US base on lease but its not, Year late but i had to vent, Sorry :/

Binkov needs to give us the showdown we're all really wondering about: could Australia prevail in a third Emu War if it were fought today?

Please do Mexico vs France in 2021. Part two of the 1860-1867 war.

Nicaragua vs Bhutan, we all want this

@villepusa3830

3 жыл бұрын

@Pro Tengu thats stupid idea. You are so stupid. Andorra would obviosly win!

Realistically they could stand no chance against the mighty Bob Semples

@AndyViant

2 жыл бұрын

Hey, leave New Zealand out of this. They're secretly developing an upgrade kit for the Bob Semple and I am literally shaking in fear

Where do you get your numbers from, for military equipment ?

Nice

Never Understimate the Aussies! "If I had to take hell, I would use the Australians to take it and the New Zealanders to hold it." -Erwin Rommel.

@fateavaraccus6563

3 жыл бұрын

U mean the same soldiers that killed and raped innocent people in Afghanistan?

@w0mblemania

3 жыл бұрын

@@fateavaraccus6563 Run along little man, run along.

@matthewrolls9426

3 жыл бұрын

@@fateavaraccus6563 yeah..the only country that did shit like that...what did the Japanese do in world war 2? The Russians in the same war? Fuck outta here 🤣

@dillieisawesome

3 жыл бұрын

@@fateavaraccus6563 why would they rape dirty filth.

@choatus

3 жыл бұрын

@@fateavaraccus6563 Your own country will have bad apples just the same, are you even brave enough to tell us where you're from? I bet your own soldiers have done the same or much worse.... War is war. bad shit happens in war. Always has, always will.

Australia is more worried about a rising Indonesia to its North than worry about Japan.

@uraniumcranium2613

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah nah

@AndyViant

2 жыл бұрын

you realize Indonesia is sinking, not rising? they're going to have to spend massive proportion of their GDP relocating their capital from Jakarta.

Almost good, except forgotten 1 thing. There is going to be a joint exercise between Australia and Japan. So a 10K strong navy, plus 250K observers, can do a Trojan horse under red carpet condition.

@mnd7381

3 жыл бұрын

Wait what..

Can you make a video about US vs rest of the world I've seen a video about that long time ago but still it's bothere me 😅

make one about haiti vs nepal millions of people are requesting this battle since ages.

Video idea: the best militaries in the World *by budget.* The most effective forces by budget - so while America is the most powerful in the World, it also spends more than the next few militaries combined. Compared by money spent, who had gotten the best bang for their buck? Choose a arbitrary figure… $10 billion or so, and then divide or multiply that nations forces by whatever percentage $10 billion is compared to their actual military budget.

@antimatter4733

3 жыл бұрын

China very likely gets the most value for its spending. The fact that the military industry is owned by the government combined with their massive industrial power and cheaper labor. Oh and you can add economies of scale to all of that. I wouldn't be surprised if china gets 1/3 more value per dollar than the US, there's a reason they're catching up to the capabilities of the US so fast

@missilemans6688

3 жыл бұрын

Russia would most likely win. The fact that they get only 1/10th of the funding of the US and still keep their numbers and quality comparable to the US is amazing

@mickeyg7219

3 жыл бұрын

It depends on the doctrine, generally speaking, defending costs less than attacking. The US' large spending is largely due to the need to upkeep its power projection, and higher salary for the military personnel is also another factor.

@antimatter4733

3 жыл бұрын

@@mickeyg7219 sorry but capitalism and corruption are the main factors, look up how much money the defense contractors make, and how much they pay to politicians to get the government to spend more and even to keep funding terrible failed programs long past when they should have been cut.

@antimatter4733

3 жыл бұрын

@@missilemans6688 Russia definitely gets some really good development, but on their newer weapons they lack the funding or industry to produce them in large quantities, and hence are stuck upgrading their old tech. Unfortunate, would love for them to mass produce some su57s and t14s

5:25 - I saw that ship(class) like few days ago (live) with helicopter on deck.

@_Leouch

3 жыл бұрын

@John Yeomans quite nice ship

It would be great if you could make a simulation of a conflict that actually has a chance of occuring.

Emus vs Samurai place your bets

@wannaseethevid

3 жыл бұрын

Don't forget the Geisha and Drop Bears.

@AndyViant

2 жыл бұрын

@@wannaseethevid I think that the pron hub searches are mostly Magical Girls versus Irukandji Jellyfish. Or something like that.

You forgot the usual ending with the flags.

@gctzx

3 жыл бұрын

This scenario was so pointless it didn't need them.

@brijekavervix7340

3 жыл бұрын

*The flags smash together and the words 'Nothing happens!' flash across the screen* Happy? ;)

@gctzx

3 жыл бұрын

@@brijekavervix7340 seems reasonable!

@user-rf9mx4qf7z

3 жыл бұрын

@@brijekavervix7340 The flags appear on opposite sides of the screen and glare at each other angrily, but never smash together.

The Australian landscape would be its greatest defence asset. Even if an invader were permitted to land troops unimpeded, surviving in many parts of Australia is a difficult and costly exercise. Just the fuel to travel the vast distances between targets of interest would be a major logistical operation. I wonder if, in the face of a land invasion, Australia would dust of the Brisbane Line defence plan?

where do you get all the military stats from?

As an aussie, Australia’s entire military strategy is, hopefully if we do whatever the Americans want they will defend our country for us

@snapdragon9300

3 жыл бұрын

Obviously you are either not an Aussie, or one one of the least informed.As a kiwi who regularly goes on defence forums online, id recommend you vist defencetalk.com at least, one of many that mentions just how massive the defence whitepaper spend Australia has done and is doing over the next ten years on all its forces,how it exceeds any regional power, and is ranked currently 12th in the world.

@Hoot_hoot777

3 жыл бұрын

They are improving it, but I think the strategy is to basically make an attacker pay to much to make an attack worth while or bleed them and hold untill one of allies back us up. From what I understand we could hold for some time. Though I thought we had more Aircraft. I found that concern.

@robman2095

2 жыл бұрын

@@Hoot_hoot777 yes but that is the defence strategy of most countries. It is preferable to deter the enemy from ever attacking than to try to defeat them in battle.

Great video! How does Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and Philippians vs China? or something similar like south china sea countries vs China?

An interesting fact that I was told by an ex-Australian soldier who used to train men in jungle combat in far North Queensland. He said that the NVA & VC used to have a saying during the Vietnam conflict: "beware of the man with the long barrel". This is in reference to the fact that Australian soldier's standard issue rifle was the L1A1 (SLR) in 7.62. It hit far harder with greater jungle penetration than the M16.

@robman2095

2 жыл бұрын

Yes if you got shot with an SLR you stayed shot.

Could you once do modern Dutch vs Japanese army?