Effective range of 200km... When you want need to land warheads on foreheads but want to keep your artillery within your borders.

@jadynmurrell80

4 жыл бұрын

How poetic

@maxim6088

4 жыл бұрын

If the Germans had this in ww2, they wouldn't need the v2 rocket

@almachizit3207

4 жыл бұрын

Call it cross-country

@brokenursa9986

4 жыл бұрын

@S Schwerer Gustav was enormous and expensive. They only built two of them and scarcely used either because they were too expensive. A CLG gun would have been dirt cheap by comparison and far more effective.

@Alpostpone

4 жыл бұрын

Germans had the "Paris Gun" in WW1, which did exactly this. And it was useless.

>Excess of 200km >7km/s This thing doesn't have ballistic drop... It has *orbital arc*

@bob123728

4 жыл бұрын

UwU Awoo-boi noticed my bulge!

@maxim6088

4 жыл бұрын

@@bob123728 what... the... fuck... STOP. JUST. STOP.

@bob123728

4 жыл бұрын

@@maxim6088 no u

@moongduri5466

4 жыл бұрын

@@bob123728 *confused screaming*

@nikokareno4156

4 жыл бұрын

@@maxim6088 UwU. Yezz yet no. He will not stop it ever. I cannot stop it either. Shut your mouth. It is a parasite that effects minds. Soon you too will be infected by the UwU. The awoo. And the boi. You too will start using words such as bamboozled. Yes. It is terrible. But there is hope. Grab a tin foil hat

"One issue with CLGG is the demand for extremely accurate parts manufacture..." -happy German noises.

@rhainbow2530

4 жыл бұрын

*Laughts in Swiss*

@MykolaSternenkoDroneBoyHoleMan

4 жыл бұрын

Copies in China

@TS-jm7jm

4 жыл бұрын

@@MykolaSternenkoDroneBoyHoleMan not for too much longer if attitudes develop which eschew chinese manufacturing.

@azizithelethargic9229

4 жыл бұрын

Spectating in Malay.

@robertmoore3982

4 жыл бұрын

Casually drunk in American

Shouldn't be confused with a Light Gas Gun. In a nutshell: An LGG is the mother of all BB guns, used to simulate meteoric impacts in labs. A CLGG is "gun, but what if powder is gas?".

@FrauleinMuller999

4 жыл бұрын

Airsoft Chem-Rail Artillery, oh yes

@mandernachluca3774

4 жыл бұрын

The first one isn't quite right, light gas guns are not in any way like bb guns, except, you know of any kind that accellerates gas with a deflagrating propallent, cause i do not. Light gas guns are rather the pneumatic equivalent of a "shotgun starter" strapped to a catapult. ;D

@Tepid24

4 жыл бұрын

@@mandernachluca3774 I was just looking for a simple explanation and I felt that "you know the feeling when you spit out a cherry seed? How you have to build up pressure inside your mouth until the seed bursts through with increased velocity?" wasn't quite as good of an image.

@lightn2783

4 жыл бұрын

So basically almost every gun invention, this, but better

@karlsinger4760

4 жыл бұрын

The difference between CLGGs and LGGs is a C = Combustion. In LGGs you just have the hydrogen because of it‘s low molecular weight. But you don‘t use the chemical reaction of hydrogen with oxygen. The gas needs to be at high pressure to accelerate the projectile. There are multiple ways of achieving that. Seriously, look it up at Wikipedia! I can’t explain it in a KZread-Commentary!

Another issue with hydrogen is its low density, leading to very large fuel tanks compared to other propellants.

@Spookston

4 жыл бұрын

Yup. This can be seen on diagram for the fuel vehicle

@fishbed4522

4 жыл бұрын

@@Spookston Another factor of why ships really are the most likely platform for such a gun, along with the issue of hydrogen evaporation not being such a big deal if you can produce it on the spot. I guess those are also perhaps the main reasons I don't see this being mounted on a tank, as size really does matter.

@nil981

4 жыл бұрын

Unless you used metallic hydrogen. It's light and incredibly dense. However metallic hydrogen is nigh impossible to make.

@mickleblade

4 жыл бұрын

@@nil981 yeah, a minor hiccup!

@Joe_Friday

4 жыл бұрын

Are there any conventional materials that could withstand such high velocities? I figured tungsten and DU but anything else? Seems like it'd burn up. I didn't know there was anything capable of firing as fast as a rail gun. Sounds like these fire way faster. So maybe I misunderstood in the video... The Navy is NOT currently fielding any guns like what was mentioned in the video? They've only tested them?

2:06 "CLG guns are actually as cool or cooler then even conventional cannons..." Oh yes they are! Oh you were talking about temperature...

@billhanna2148

4 жыл бұрын

How or why is that ? It sounds counter intuitive ..all that energy and LESS heat ??🤔

@zeburancher9480

4 жыл бұрын

@@billhanna2148 the same reason that you can touch foil in the oven without burning yourself but not the food. it transfers the energy to the air more efficiently. imagine burning a piece of paper and dropping it into a barrel, all the fire is inside the barrel but the paper burns before it ever touches the barrel. then imagine placing that paper on the barrel and burning it; even with less paper (less power) it will heat up the barrel more. the whole system produces more heat, but the gun stays cooler, the heat is dumped into the environment.

My gut feeling is that this video overstates the safety difficulties of segregated cryogenic propellants. 1. If a cryotank loses active cooling, it doesn't immediately explode. This is because boiling is endothermic. As the LO2 or LH2 boils, this absorbs heat, cooling the liquid. In general, automatic pressure release valves are simple but extremely important. LN2 is often stored unpressurized in unpowered insulated containers, and maintains liquid state by boiling off slowly, which passively cools the fluid. In my experience, a handheld dewer should be good for a day and a pallet-sized dewer should be good for a week without active cooling. 2. LH2 and LO2 are very incendiary when mixed, but many things on a tank are. For example, main gun propellant is composed of oxidizer and fuel mixed together and is an extremely high fire risk: tanks put a ton of effort into protecting the crew from main gun propellant (see wet stowage and blow-off panels). Similarly, gasoline for the tank is a huge fire risk, because it's a liquid. I would expect LO2 and LH2 to be similar in danger to gasoline if well segregated: they can start fires easily, but probably not as intensely as main gun propellant. 3. A danger I didn't notice this video mention is suffocation. If the crew compartment filled with gaseous H2, you would suffocate and never feel out of breath. Gas monitors are important, as is segregating LH2 and LO2 from the crew. 4. Wikipedia says that these weapons have issues with muzzle velocity deviation. This matches my knowledge of gas/liquid mixing. In short, it's hard to get consistent propellant mixing. Accuracy suffers. The history of rocketry includes a ton of effort put into injector plate design.

@ArchaeopteryxStudios

4 жыл бұрын

i generally support all your claims you did there. The only thing i have to add is, that i think that the Crew dont will be in great danger. When you look at the T-14 Armata, the newest tank around right now, has the crew completly seperated from the gun and the turret. So when the LOX and LH is stored in tanks in the back (with blowout panels around) and the fuel lines go into the turret, the dont realy will hurt the crew inside when the tanks undergo a rapid heated dissasembly.

@JaneDoe-dg1gv

4 жыл бұрын

One idea is having the rear of the barrel set up as a combustion chamber. Actually, kind of like a muzzle-loading breach-action gun, the round would be pushed back atop the combustion chamber and fuel turbine-fed into it like a rocket engine.

@etuanno

4 жыл бұрын

Maybe you won't need to store the hydrogen in liquid form, as far as I know there's a solid variety where the hydrogen is put into a titanium alloy "sponge" that releases it when heated a bit.

@JaneDoe-dg1gv

4 жыл бұрын

etuanno the same happens with platinum but it can lead to metal fatigue and doesn't have a good storage capacity. Especially when hydrolox is not actually necessary for the technologies function.

@mandernachluca3774

4 жыл бұрын

Well, that's what you get from a channelm of wich the videos are more or less tailord to amuse, not to educate in high detail. ;D I mean, all the "future weapon" videos he made featured systems that i already knew about in quite more detail, in comparsion to what he put into the videos.

Mechanicus music in the background aha I see you have taste

@Invizive

4 жыл бұрын

The intro with it and a rocket launch footage gave me goosebumps

@herrgargoyel6576

3 жыл бұрын

For the Omnissiah

@BiggestJ247

3 жыл бұрын

-happy mars boi noises-

I'm happy you used a rocket that actually uses Hydrolox as a propellant (and in all stages too :D)

@Spookston

4 жыл бұрын

I felt like it wouldn't be right if I didn't. And I knew someone was going to notice lol

@Katniss218

4 жыл бұрын

@@Spookston Well, I'm a bit of a rocket nerd ;P

@midgetman4206

4 жыл бұрын

@@Katniss218 a bit? I like rockets too but I haven't even looked at how to tell the difference between fuels

@Katniss218

4 жыл бұрын

@@midgetman4206 Hydrolox plumes are usually cleaner and transparent (delta IV cores are red due to an ablative nozzle), methalox plumes are purple/red, kerolox are more opaque and usually yellowish-orange, hypergolic can look like anything (usually red-orange and somewhat darker), solids leave a trail of thick smoke. And TEATEB (ignitor fluid in Kerolox) burns green :D

@trezapoioiuy

4 жыл бұрын

MidgetMan 420 well if you can tell what rocket it is, then you can know the fuel it burns

7.2 km/s is literally Mach 21. That is incomprehensibly fast, I couldn't imagine how powerful a shock wave that'd be or the level of penetration a round capable of withstanding that force would have...

@Phantom-bh5ru

4 жыл бұрын

_ Jalmon _ ikr? When I heard faster then railgun my mind was blown, before that point I thought the railgun was the end all be all fast as fuck boi but I guess there is something that can fire rounds almost double a rail guns muzzle velocity lol.

@Bennet2391

4 жыл бұрын

@@Phantom-bh5ru Current railguns are limited by their construction, energy source and the material of the rails. While conventional cannons, LGG, CLGG have a theoretical maximum speed, limited by the maximum expansion speed of the gas, railguns have no theoretical speed limit (besides the speed of light). Railguns are still the be all - end all of kinetic weapons, we just need to develop it further.

@Phantom-bh5ru

4 жыл бұрын

Bennet Petersen ah ok thx

@abyssstrider2547

4 жыл бұрын

@@Phantom-bh5ru For example if you made a railgun that was the size of a building and was powered by a nuclear plant you could even destroy something on the moon with it

@dereenaldoambun9158

4 жыл бұрын

@@abyssstrider2547 "You can't just shoot a hole into the surface of Moon!"

For a case study on why using pure oxygen as propellant for combat weapons can be problematic, see the Japanese Type-93 torpedo.

@Crosshair84

4 жыл бұрын

The type 93 didn't use liquid oxygen, but compressed oxygen. You are correct in that 100% oxygen is extremely problematic.

@samiamrg7

4 жыл бұрын

Crosshair84 That’s right, I guess I got wrapped up in the subject of the video and wrote “liquid” instead of just “oxygen” or “pure oxygen.”

@Tuberuser187

4 жыл бұрын

Or the Apollo 1 fire for an example of how horrific a pure oxygen fire in a confined space can be, the standby emergency teams couldn't even put the fire out with powder and Halon and the flame retardant suits the Astronauts where wearing also caught fire.

@1337penguinman

4 жыл бұрын

@@Tuberuser187 Main reason modern spacecraft are pressurized with regular air.

@piotrd.4850

3 жыл бұрын

German and US torpedoes didn't even need that to be far more problematic :D

I think CLG can only ever be practical in naval applications. For land applications it can only be practical on permanent to long term emplacement. Think missile defense facilities and shore artillery (which I know is obsolete today but with the increased range and very customizable trajectories will make it viable again along with naval gunfire artillery.)

@midgetman4206

4 жыл бұрын

And that is also just cool

@nissen6227

4 жыл бұрын

Imagine having the entire ocean being your propellant charge.

@JaneDoe-dg1gv

4 жыл бұрын

Super long range broadside battleships!

@JaneDoe-dg1gv

4 жыл бұрын

Imagine the glory! Dear grid square a-10, please humbly accept these one hundred cannon rounds.

@kolinmartz

4 жыл бұрын

dangerouspeople1!!!!!!! This is why shore artillery can finally be viable again. Limitless access to potential propellant.

EVEN IN DEATH SERVE THE OMNISSAH

@leobracken2316

4 жыл бұрын

01000110 01001111 01010010 00100000 01010100 01001000 01000101 00100000 01001111 01001101 01001110 01001001 01010011 01010011 01001001 01000001 01001000

"7.2 km/s" So.... orbital speed! Hit things over the horizon without even aiming up.

@smithfinland214

3 жыл бұрын

orbital defence battery, welcome to earth

@CallanElliott

3 жыл бұрын

Not quite, that's 11km/s

@Tuzszo

3 жыл бұрын

@@CallanElliott 11 km/s is escape velocity, low earth orbit is only 7.8 - 8 km/s

@yestermonth

3 жыл бұрын

@@CallanElliott Create a bigger one and then boom, you shooting space

@ImieNazwiskoOK

Жыл бұрын

@Tuzszo Loss of efficiency due to gravity and atmosphere still needs to be counted into it, more than 1km/s is added (usually)

It's a water gun.

@Daniel-wy2kx

4 жыл бұрын

This guy gets it

@nichsa8984

3 жыл бұрын

@@Daniel-wy2kx is that a secret missing substance is a helium

@jonaszszczepanski6573

3 жыл бұрын

Its wa'er

@stealthcone

3 жыл бұрын

That could turn a destroyer into Swiss cheese within 5 seconds at 300km

@inwit594

3 ай бұрын

We are all water. Many things are water. Water is all.

When i heard mechanicus playing it reminded me of mandolorgaming dancing to it.

@samuelbrown3854

3 жыл бұрын

I’m gonna need a link to that vid

Ah. So this is the product of wanting to shoot a tank through what could've been, a building

@mobiuscoreindustries

3 жыл бұрын

7km/s of velocity? Modern apfsds can already go through serval buildings like they are made of paper. What you are looking at is something you can fire through new York end to end and still have enough penetration to go through 3 navy destroyers. Remember that these speeds are getting awfully close to orbital velocities, and are often superior to suborbital speeds, meaning you can easily get CLG guns to land on foreheads form another country.

Never knew about CLG guns but it sounds amazing to build with it a super weapon like in command and conquer.

I think this is the most practical future gun concept. (For artillery, at least) That range is pretty scary.

The idea sort of reminds me of how the Sturmtiger used a rocket propelled mortar round. Not the same in operation, but hey, rockets!

@TheArklyte

4 жыл бұрын

Sturmtiger would be closer to Gyrojet. In battleship caliber though:D

I’m wonder if CLG would be viable for space combat, the ambient temperature of space could be used to keep the gasses cool and it would be much easier to maintain the vacuum in the chamber since the new issue become keeping gas in rather than atmosphere out.

The one application that immediately stands out for a CLG cannon would be future missile defense, especially for ground installations. If you can lob fragmentation rounds at 7km/s, that could make for an effective way to knock down hypersonic missiles at a drastically lower cost per shot compared to rocket interceptors.

@FMHikari

4 жыл бұрын

In short, hyperspeed shotguns

@JaneDoe-dg1gv

4 жыл бұрын

M P supersonic CIWS shotguns.

@FMHikari

4 жыл бұрын

I think it won't be using the "Close" part of that.

@thefirstprimariscatosicari6870

4 жыл бұрын

@@FMHikari "Close" compared to the 200 km range.

@guytech7310

4 жыл бұрын

The issue with hypersonic weapons is tracking them. They produce plasma due to the high velocity heating the air into plasma. The plasma blocks radar reflections make it impossible to track using radar. Hypersonic weapons also take evasive action, & fly in a non-predictable flight path to make it nearly impossible to shoot them down with ballistic weapons. The rate of fire from a CLG or rail gun would be about 1000 times to slow to be effective. Even a Laser system would like be unable to stop them, because a laser weapon needs several seconds on target to deliver enough energy, especially for a hypersonic missile or kinetic projectile that needs to deal with extreme amount of heat. Laser weapons have a limited effective range because the air will disperse the energy, and very powerful laser beams will ionize the air causing severe attenuation of the beam's energy.

Spook even chose the right rocket lol...

BLESSED BE THE MACHINE

@giot1038

4 жыл бұрын

For the omnissiah

@leobracken2316

4 жыл бұрын

01000110 01001111 01010010 00100000 01010100 01001000 01000101 00100000 01001111 01001101 01001110 01001001 01010011 01010011 01001001 01000001 01001000

"so, I want to kill that spacecraft with a tank."

@batstoast3560

4 жыл бұрын

I go kill capitalist xenos for motherland (insert picture of tank in space) I hope you have a good day oh and the first bit was a joke.

6:27 are we gonna ignore the fact that he shot down a chopper with the main gun?

@Spookston

4 жыл бұрын

I was using a proximity round, so it's not incredibly impressive

@TheArklyte

4 жыл бұрын

@@Spookston Abrams has VT fuzed munitions?

@rungcox4823

4 жыл бұрын

TheArklyte ye

@EnterpriseKnight

4 жыл бұрын

@@Spookston Proximity rounds? I guess that's a topic for a next video

@spysareamyth5806

4 жыл бұрын

EnterpriseKnight basic idea is that the round has a radar that detects proximity to the nearest object, once the round enters within X meters it detonates the round. Very useful against aircraft where scoring a direct hit can be very difficult.

This will actually work more in space for some reason, high speed and the fuel is right there.

@youmukonpaku3168

4 жыл бұрын

right there at incredibly low density, still has recoil that your engines have to compensate for, and where'd you find the free oxygen?

@dsdy1205

4 жыл бұрын

@@youmukonpaku3168 Electrolysed from ice deposits on the moon. If we're at the stage where we're fighting over stuff in space, we almost definitely have that

*Hears music in the background* *Starts praying to Omnissiah in binary code*

The best part about rail/CLG guns is that they are constantly improving, and at the accelerated rate of tech coming out we'll probably see these weapons on ships and tanks in the near future.

I’m loving this series, keep it up man

2:25 yup, remembered that from my ROTC training on an 105 howitzer. Up to 7 bags (if I still remember correctly) for that type of round.

I feel like somebody can make a tank design so rediculous it works even though it shouldn't... Also I never knew this kind of weaponry existed

@johnperetin5944

4 жыл бұрын

*Ferdinand Porsche would like to know your location*

@Miftahul_786

4 жыл бұрын

*Panzer VIII Maus would like to know your location...*

@devynd6476

4 жыл бұрын

DIS IS WAT I DON GET ABOUT U HUMIES YA TALK LOT BOUT “DESINE” AN’ WOTNOT AND UR STUFF STILL DON’ WORK. JUS PUT A GUN N’ SUM WHEELS ON A CHAIR AND U GIT A PER’ECT DAKKA MASHEEN

Spooks, your optimistic outlook on the future of weaponry is an inspiration to us all

Great video Spook, Iove your potential future guns vids

“Children of the Omnissiah” is the Perfect music for this video

“How do we make out tank guns better?” “F*CKING ROCKETS”

nice man very interesting to see what the future holds in store for cannons

They can use or MEK-hydrogenperoxide or heptil-sulfur acid propellant system. It toxic, but lower temperature and pressure standards.

@JaneDoe-dg1gv

4 жыл бұрын

Калиев Мади I had thought about nitric oxide and methanol. Both really cheap and easy to store, if underpowered compared to hydrolox.

What i love about this series is how it looks at some of the more obscure ideas. Because ithere's a lot of interesting stuff like this that gets overloooked in favor of lasers and railguns. And i'm sure there's more stuff out there like the RAVEN gun that i've never even heard of before this series.

So you just fixed my mortar/artillery propulsion for my military science fiction mate

Because we do not have a good understanding of how Metallic Hydrogen works, whether it is stable at normal pressures, as the only place we speculate it exists is deep inside gas giants like Jupiter or Saturn, any thing concerning Metallic Hydrogen is just that speculation. But if it does remain solid after formation, or just liquid, Metallic hydrogen becomes a radical propellant for not just rockets as far less fuel would be needed to get into orbit, but for CLGGs the fuel becomes far less of a liability in combat. However I do agree that CLGGs make more sense as ship board artillery or battlefield artillery. As a Tank weapon it seems unlikely at this time. Metallic Hydrogen also poses the possibility of room temperature superconductivity. If this is teh case, then Railguns just matched or leapfrogged CLGGs.

so does that mean we could finally see the return of the Montana Class Battleship with large bore CLGs? (this is a joke)

@flyboymike111357

4 жыл бұрын

Wouldn't be a shock if the PLAN tries it, then has an accident, losing the ship an all hands.

@Cowboycomando54

4 жыл бұрын

@@flyboymike111357 PLAN? People's Liberation Army Navy?

@flyboymike111357

4 жыл бұрын

@@Cowboycomando54 Yeah, they're already cutting corners on railguns

@dsdy1205

3 жыл бұрын

@@Cowboycomando54 That's what they actually call it yes. To be fair it's a bit of a mistranslation, the chinese words that PLA is translated from reads more accurately as "People's Liberation Force" or some other non-force-specific name for armed forces, but it got directly translated to "Army" and has stuck ever since.

@Phantom-bh5ru

2 жыл бұрын

@@Cowboycomando54 more like people’s liberation armed forces navy

Man I love videos like these ones. I like to keep up with military history and technology, but outside of railguns, have not heard of any of these other systems. Keep up the awesome work and amazing content.

I feel that this would be ideal on a warship, but as you said filling the ship with lots of liquids that are cryogenic and go boom might not go down well. Was there any prototypes of multi-stage coil guns, like MAC in Halo ever built? That seems like it has the benefits of railguns (and CLGGs) but with out the barrel wear or the mad propellants.

@samiamrg7

2 жыл бұрын

Ships are already stuffed with explosive and flammable materials. Replacing solid propellant with liquid/gaseous propellant probably wouldn't be too much of a change from the norm. That being said, pure oxygen IS extraordinarily flammable, and has to be stored with utmost care.

I was watching this and literally thinking "It sounds like we should use these as like, Super Heavy Artillery equivalents, Long Range High impact guns with a tender and main gun vehicle" and then you suggested the two vehicle setup. Excellent Video as always! I could see these deployed in limited numbers as Long Range Fire support and on ships in a specialized almost battleship replacement like vessel (IE heavy fire support) Though im not sure if Tanks will ever get them (at least not in their current form) since it sounds very mechanically complex and thats, as you've said before, not always the best for a frontline combat vehicle. (Also like, Excellent music choice, love the Mechanicus soundtrack)

@CyberneticSoupp

4 жыл бұрын

oh! thats actually a question i had for you Spook! What are your thoughts on Direct Fire support vessels? will there ever be a successor to the Battleship in terms of hard hitting and relatively big guns?

@quentintin1

4 жыл бұрын

hydrogen has very low density, even cooled, meaning the storage tanks have to be quite big so it's very unlikely they will even think about putting it in a tank, artillery on the other hand can work as there is less of a size problem (than and you can have a tender for the propellant like spookston talked in the vidya)

@JaneDoe-dg1gv

4 жыл бұрын

I had thought about methanol or dimethyl-ether as possible replacements. Also nitric oxide is a pretty easy to store as a compressed oxidizer. For combustion instability, couldn't an internal combustion chamber, like a rocket engine combuster, be used. If it's turbine fed you could hypothetically have constant barrel pressure and unlimited throttle control.

"articulated artillery vehicles" *Happy Long Tom Noises*

great content as always, short and informative

I love the vids keep up the great work also i love the fact you go in deep detail and give so much info

Hey Spookston, after all this videos about technicalities on tanks, cannons and even experimental technologies, I really have to ask: how do you manage to acquire such informations? Are you just a "tank enthusiast" or there are wikias or even, I dunno, "courses" to know and study all this things? Because they're NUTS interesting and I'd like to know more. Thanks in advance, keep up the good work man, best channel I discovered in a while ;)

@Khorne_of_the_Hill

4 жыл бұрын

You can find a lot of military research papers and stuff like that pretty easily on Google

So what I've gathered from this is it could make a very effective artillery platform for either specialized artillery units or cannons on naval vessels I really like your videos I enjoy learning about armoured combat units and the weapons they use both realistic and sci-fi

You beat me to it. I was going to say that ETC guns are probably the future for direct combat. Good vid.

Highly informative, great way to start the day

When I saw the thumbnail I thought CLG stands for comically large gun.

This is the problem with most "future" weapon ideas. Limited use or practicality which will lead to not being fully adopted or in very rare cases. It's not bad but its along the lines of the G11 and caseless munitions. Great idea but not up to scuff with more conventional designs or munitions that work. in 10 years this comment will probably be wrong as composite cases get replaced by caseless and im getting body parts replaced with robotics.

@abyssstrider2547

4 жыл бұрын

So far it would only be applicable in navy but if we figure out how to store hydrogen easier and safer then it could be used in land vehicles as well.

@piotrd.4850

3 жыл бұрын

Well, G11 ultimately passed all trails and what killed was economics.

@CallanElliott

3 жыл бұрын

Everything goes through a phase like this, but I'm pretty sure you could go back to the Forties and find all sorts of proposals that were blue sky ludicrous back then, but now are commonplace.

@AceFalken

3 жыл бұрын

@@CallanElliott I kind of referred to that in my comment in the last part. I was just saying now it seems ridiculous and even if adopted it wouldn't be a major use but in the future the idea might be able to be of use (like caseless ammo) and able to actually be adopted.

Good observation! CLG isn’t likely to be a technology used on MBTs anytime soon. Artillery however is well suited to the use, the solid propellant used in artillery today is nearly as dangerous. With properly applied safeguards could be safer.

Good job, great video! I think you are the only youtuber that make videos about futuristic-experimental technologies (maybe i'm wrong). Keep it going! Stay safe! (sorry for my bad english, I salute you from Romania)

That was a "puts on sunglasses" cool topic.

@bahayesilyurt1510

4 жыл бұрын

stfu

Imagine mixing this with coilgun tech; use the light gas as the first stage then the electromagnetic coils to boost the velocity even further!

I've heard of these things before but never knew what the big deal was about them, thanks for filling me in.

Your vehicle weaponry videos are your best ones so far.

CHILDREN OF THE OMNISSIAH!!!

Did your research turn up anything about the use of alternative fuels such as methane or monopropellants? You end up taking a hit in projectile velocity, but the gases are much more storable as a result.

@CallanElliott

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I mean when you're in excess of 5km/s, the difference between velocities becomes academic.

@minhducnguyen9276

2 жыл бұрын

Methane should be the second best. You want the gas that pushes the shell to made of molecules as light as possible. Gun powder create steam, nitrogen and carbon dioxide gas and the later two are much heavier than water molecules. If you use pure hydrogen the pushing gas would be water. If you use methane there would be some carbon dioxide in the gas but the fuel still have one of the highest hydrogen content. You could also use ammonia but it's corrosive to the metal and quite toxic at high concentration.

The background music, i love you so mutch

I just wanted to say I love your work and your growing channel

So, any chance on episodes on wheeled tanks and electic tanks in the foreseable future?

Local furry explains tank weaponry

For oxygen and hydrogen storage, you could store instead water then perform the electrolysis just before firing

@trezapoioiuy

4 жыл бұрын

Ant Grif how fast can that be. Also you’d have to cool them down to cryogenic.

Damn there's a ton of people sharing some very nice info on physics and chemistry(which i SUCK at) down below. i'm surprised to see that there's quite a few stuff that i haven't heard of before and that led to a ton of bookmarks and research i'm gonna be doing in this period. i'm SO GLAD to see there's sooooo much stuff i don't know because i never heard of before...such a nice opportunity to learn new interesting things thank you to all the cool guys down below that shared such info.

What about the vindicator from Warhammer 40k can you talk about that one?

Phase 1 of plan complete, engaging phase 2... Design a hover tank that makes sense plz?

@JefeInquisidorGOW

4 жыл бұрын

There's the Apache Longbow and the Hind, what other kind of hover thank do you want?

@TeddyKrimsony

4 жыл бұрын

hovertanks are called helicopters

@daplatek2836

4 жыл бұрын

The soviets actually succeeded in creating a hover tank it's called a Mil Mi 24

@pierre-mariecaulliez6285

4 жыл бұрын

The only overtank that would make sense to me would be a light recon vehicule... No MBT, no heavy. Just rush at grass hopping altitude, get in, get the recon, get out regardless of terrain. So, no. No tank. A hover jeep or drone would make sense, but armor and guns tipicaly associated with tanks won't work with hover tech in my opinion...

@dadbear5316

4 жыл бұрын

Y'all need to stop talking about helicopters, yes I saw the video, I mean a hover tank not a helicopter. How many times do I have to say I want a hover tank for you people to stop saying helicopter?

fantastic choice of music!

Love the use of the mechanicus soundtrack

Could you solve the hydrogen leaking issue by just switching to a different propellant (albeit at a loss of efficiency). Kerosene is commonly used in rockets today and doesn't have the same sorts of storage issues. Methane is going to be used on the rockets of tomorrow (basically a lot of the rockets currently under development, well, 3 American ones, use methane as their fuel), and although that does have to still be cryogenically frozen it doesn't have the same leakage problem of hydrogen. If you add the Sabatier process to the electrolysis and scrub CO2 from the atmosphere then you can also create that aboard ships, and it would be a bit more efficient than kerosene (but less efficient than hydrogen).

@xSchattenfluchx

4 жыл бұрын

You need a very very low molecular weight fuel for this to work properly. There's a strict underlying velocity limit to combustion powered firearms: The projectile can never be faster than the speed of sound in the (pressurized due to explosion) propellant. The heavier the propellant, the lower the speed of sound.

@noname117spore

4 жыл бұрын

@@xSchattenfluchx That does complicate matters, and I will admit that hydrogen would be better if it's feasible, but would the use of methane still be better than the use of gunpowder? I think I'd need to read up on some stuff, since due to it being cold, liquid, and pressurized, the speed of sound in both methane and hydrogen would be different from the easily google-able results.

Hey spookston can we bring back battleships with CLG guns

@JaneDoe-dg1gv

4 жыл бұрын

nicy vinoy I would think cruisers would work better. Battleships are too slow and don't have enough armor. Using many more small cruisers would help protect the fleet from both naval and aerial torpedoes. I have also read a comment on here that mentions using methane and compressed air instead of cryogenic hydrolox. Imagine a wall of cruisers armed with two triple-gun turrets firing 10" shells at 7 Km/s ~60 RPM per ship.

5 seconds in and I gotta comment on the awesome choice of music! Mechanicus has such an awesome soundtrack

Hey spookston, I would like to see a video on quad track tanks and see how they fail and see how you would fix them if you could (even though it’s better to just have two tracks) so that we could see if we could make a quad track tank work

man can you post your bibliography for this i really want to read it my self

Hi spook lad

@Spookston

4 жыл бұрын

hello

Children of the omnissiah as the background music, i see you are a man of culture

I love your videos Spook

How do I make an great anphibius tank?

@Spookston

4 жыл бұрын

Making it float would be ideal but seriously, it depends on the doctrine of the nation using it

@GodittoC

4 жыл бұрын

T(h)ank you good sir, I will now use this new found knowledge to make my own private tank

Children of the omnissiha as your background music THE MACHINE GOD APPROVES OF THIS ACTION

This is the kind of content I like.

An awesome application for this might be onboard an aircraft. Aircraft like Hercules already carry their own LOX, so if you wanted to make a very potent airbourne bombardment platform with CLG guns, you could. Imagine the power of that, especially against armour and fortifications. Obviously there are issues with pressure differentials and temperatures onboard aircraft, but there are such immense benefits to a platform like a Spectre gunship but with CLG. Not to mention deployment as land based artillery

Imagine going against the first nation to put CLGG into production on ships and it firing directly at you: 1. Outranges most modern weapons 2. Pretty much no warning 3. Interception is pretty much impossible 4. You can’t use any electronic warfare to interfere since it’s a kinetic energy round

@NotWorthTheAirIBreathe

4 ай бұрын

Coilguns could provide similar advantages with even longer ranges with the added simultaneous benefit and disadvantage being that all energy being generated by electricity. The US Army and DARPA are testing such a gun with a range in excess of 1000km. Its range is so significant, they couldn’t accurately assess its full capabilities firing across half the Pacific Ocean basically.

Using the Mechanicus ost on a video about future tech? *The Omnisiah approves.*

I think water storage and on-board hydrolysis could be the answer to storage pressures bc water is inert and could be hydrolyzed to create the gasses needed for the charge in small quantities and held in overpressure (to allow there to always be enough gas to operate the cannon) until the round is fired

@oakwhelie

4 жыл бұрын

The problem would be doing it fast enough in combat situation

@mill2712

Жыл бұрын

​@@oakwhelie That would seem like a noticeable issue. You'd probably still need some gas storage so you can more easily reload the shots. You'd also have to make sure you prepared in advance.

Bro the ending credits music. The memories. The feels.

Ive listened to Children of the Omnissiah so much i thought i was going crazy when I heard it in the background haha

I love the Children of the Omnissiah in the background

good video spook

never heard of this technology before...thnks !

I see you're using the new Mechanicum theme, the Fabricator General approves.

Using the Warhammer 40k Mecanicus soundtrack... brave... i love it

Thought: If the Terran Federation (or United Citizen's Federation) ever deployed armored fighting vehicles alongside the Mobile Infantry, they would be called the Mobile Armor.

I can feel the Omnissiah's presence in the background. Praise be.

jo that heli snipe at 6:29 was cool

love the music the machine spirit approves

"the music! is that... PRAISE THE OMNISSIAH!"

Praise the technology of the Omnissiah. (Great music choice)