Would you survive the Nuclear War?

@xxSWxxNINJA

Жыл бұрын

Although this may appear one sided, that would still result in human life on Earth effectively ending. Nuclear Winter would drop average temperatures to below 15*c, for a very long time, food would all but vanish, our social and economic way of life would end completely. Nobody wins, even a small scale (Never going to stay small scale) nuclear exchange would end our known way of life. Once you realise this, you realise how unbelievably on the edge of destruction we truly are.

@bornwithsauce

Жыл бұрын

Let's find out

@T12296Cagle

Жыл бұрын

I live 8 miles away from a nuclear power plant in southern NJ theres literally no chance of survival in this area if that thing gets nuked and it would too because power station.

@357majmun

Жыл бұрын

Would you want to?

@destroydapacka

Жыл бұрын

Nope. I'm a rock stuck between two hard places less than 30 klicks from each other so I'm just gonna grab a deck chair, have a cold beer and jerk myself off until I'm insta dust.

my concern for a US response is how would we be able to launch over the pole without Russia losing their mind? "Trust me bro, they're going for china not you....."

@christophersnuffer1972

Жыл бұрын

If China launches, its a good assumption Russia has too.

@MrGriff305

Жыл бұрын

​@@christophersnuffer1972 exactly, China is friendly to Russia for this exact reason

@MOINMOIN586

Жыл бұрын

okay, lets start Nuklear war against them

@mechadoggy

Жыл бұрын

The sanctions against Russia have especially made Russia friendly toward China since China is willing to be Russia’s economic partner after we have economically isolated Russia. This will naturally make Russia feel indebted towards China do that they will help China, like when China inevitably invades Taiwan or whatever. I do not think we will be able to win against China and Russia combined. I think we would lose, and I don’t mean “lose” as in packing your bags and going home, like at the end of the Vietnam War. I mean “lose” as in see quite a few of our cities destroyed or captured.

@user-ic2vw4ns8l

Жыл бұрын

@@mechadoggy america isn't alone it's whole world vs russia china nkorea iran

With as few nukes as they have, I think China would use a mostly counter-value strategy of ~100% civilian targets instead of 50/50 civ/military

@User-jr7vf

Жыл бұрын

@@florinivan6907 Why do you say that the 'cops would be gone'? Are police officers in the USA not that dedicated to their job? I'm from Brazil and it is hard to imagine the same happening here, where the police is an autonomous branch of the Army and is forbiden by law of going on strike or creating associations.

@User-jr7vf

Жыл бұрын

​@@florinivan6907 I guessed that. I see news from your country where police officers are simply fired after some incident, and in the same fashion, they are easily hired. Here in Brazil serving in the police is nothing like that. It is a military career and the processes of joining and eventually leaving the force are lengthy.

@DD-sw1dd

Жыл бұрын

They’d target our farmland in the middle US along with a handful of military bases. The mentality required to launch first would be a lot like a suicide bomber. They’d look for long term meaningful damage if they couldn’t win. Which means forgoing military bases if it means we can’t grow our own food for god knows how long.

@juicebox6581

11 ай бұрын

Somebody must have deleted a comment cause this comment string makes no sense

@horustrismegistus1017

9 ай бұрын

@@juicebox6581 Our criminally infiltrated FBI does that

Those last few bombers were just a slap in the face lmao 😂

Seeing all those lights Dim as nukes laid waste to the coast was slightly disturbing. Millions of lives gone, plus millions more from the fall out and infrastructure damage.

@alexvujik4523

Жыл бұрын

What do you think will happen to civilisation when the food supply collapses because of radioactive water.

@mechadoggy

Жыл бұрын

This is why it remains absolutely critical for us to NOT get involved with the war in Ukraine. We CANNOT risk this war erupting into a wider conflict lest it mean the possible extinction of our species.

@rogue-ish5713

Жыл бұрын

billions of lives gone and that was a gift. The punishment is the survivors

Loved the video @TheDevildogGamer! Can't wait for the next video of Broken Arrow, DCS, Nuclear War Simulator, or even Company of Heroes 3 man! If there's one thing to remember about Any Missile, it's this: "The Missile Knows where it is, Because it knows where it isn't..."

I love how the random pin drop outside of New York is pretty much right above my head. Thanks bro, making me feel real safe over here lol

I would love to see more of these. I also loved your commentary on some military doctrine of the cold war and now regarding nuclear weapons, so if you could get more of that, that´d be great. Cheers from one of the iradiated places in Europe :D

man i hope australia survives this

@1ch0

Жыл бұрын

Thats a good question. Who would target Australia and why. Would you even be affected if all out nuclear war broke out?

@Itraininthebogs

Жыл бұрын

@@1ch0 they would 100% get fallout if japan is struck but it’s hard to picture a scenario where a country sends a nuke to Australia.

@Feargal011

Жыл бұрын

@@Itraininthebogs Pine Gap US spy base is targetted by China and Russia. The only town within about 1000 km is Alice Springs. Whether Australian military bases, ports are targets depends on the scenarios run. I still assume Philippines military ports would be hit. Maybe Vietnam depending on regional strains.

@Scottae89

Жыл бұрын

I’m in australia, we’d be all good. Our government will launch our intercontinental boomerangs 🪃

@Itraininthebogs

Жыл бұрын

@@Scottae89 😂😂 I’m in the states we are definitely getting it

I hope you post more? I find it very interesting and helpful to understand the magnitude of destruction a nuclear war can cause.

@Brandough001

Жыл бұрын

You get an idea once that's the only idea you need.

"Portland's gone, Seattle is gone." These terms are acceptable.

Interested to know how China and Russia V the rest of the nuclear powers would play out, given the rhetoric being espoused by both of countries towards not only the U.S but its allies also.

@victorpena3129

Жыл бұрын

It will look like this even worse for china and Russia . This example doesn’t even include the known secret “ America has nuclear missions in Europe “.

@twistedbuscuit

Жыл бұрын

@Victor Peña consider that their focus won't solely be on the U.S. and Europe. Also, you'd have to take into consideration India firing nukes over the Himalayas, with the potential involvement from Pakistan. It would be interesting if, from the fall out, it would be total world devastation, or if there would be safe pockets of land, that could still be habitable.

@horustrismegistus1017

9 ай бұрын

In no scenario do we enter global nuclear war. Come back when I am correct, and the fools adamant about the idea, are invariably all proven wrong.

This is extremely informative and taught me a lot, like shorting rice and noodles if this scenario comes true

@horustrismegistus1017

9 ай бұрын

"Like shorting rice and noodles if this comes true" What?

@navegandolejanooriente6268

9 ай бұрын

obviouly because of the death and destruction coming if the USA and China duke it out. less asians in Asia than the less demand rice and noodles@@horustrismegistus1017

It would be wild to watch from the Space Station.

Like your vid’s devil dog. Been watching since the good old days

Do ICBMs rely on satellite/GPS? If so, if one side dominates space are the ICBM's still deployable?

How do you get this scenario? Have you uploaded it as a mod?

who made the little "devildoggamer subscribe" pop up close to the start of the video? I saw the same one for a different channel and now im curious

Best guess is that China doesn’t actually have a missile for every silo.

@theflyinggasmask

Жыл бұрын

And bet their detection radars hardly work

@theproceedings4050

Жыл бұрын

Heck of a bet to make...

@viejitaloca2810

Жыл бұрын

and bet that china doesnt exist and is actually a construct of our imagination

@DOSFS

Жыл бұрын

@@theproceedings4050 There is a possibility that China build those silos to be decoys not intend to actually fill them with real ICBM.

@unbreakable7633

Жыл бұрын

And the ones they do have might not work or not reach their targets. Their tech is mostly lame. 1 of 5 aircraft are usually broken.

is it possible to do an all out ww3 scenario where everyone is involved?

also what happens to the panama canal. if that is destroyed then the world literally starves, shipping is forced into the suez canal and that will quickly become bogged down in a massive traffic nightmare.

I love these videos you do, interesting stuff, you also sound like you know a few things, idk if you do but you sound like you do. nice

is there a general nuclear exchange? where all nuclear armed countries fire their missiles rather than just two opposing countries?

Well the real issue is they don't tell us how many they really have, and they may pretend they only have like 500 or something..

Does this not simulate intercepts from THAAD, or the anti ballistic missiles at Ft Greeley?

@Techno_Idioto

Жыл бұрын

It can, but you would need to place them yourself.

@Aqua.man045

Жыл бұрын

THAAD cant even take down Hamas rockets in 2021. After Bibi came and thanked Trump for giving it to Israel in 2019. Doubt they would even see it on a radar.

Almost at a million subs, almost there

It would be awesome if you could maybe do a video on what would happen at like the after effects of nuclear war I am very curious on what will happen after the war is all done and finished how long will it take until the Earth is back to normal????

@ToniMorton

Жыл бұрын

hundreds of years most likely.

@stillcantbesilencedevennow

Жыл бұрын

Depends son what you mean by normal. The earth will turn, plants and animals will survive. Humans even might. Not all of em though. Not a lot of em.

@justanamericandoggo6725

6 ай бұрын

Not long

Damn that's a dope simulation

I really want to try this out. My old computers are not fast enough.

Heyo! I’m in Seattle, don’t lump us in with Portland. The cool people are just quiet over here.

What’s the name of this game ? Where can I find it?

what game is this?

The target saturation is outdated. I didn't see any nukes targeting the military man-made islands built up in the South China Sea. Definitely need to take those out as part of an overwhelming response.

what program are you using?

I wonder what the Russians would say if there were a ton of nukes just flying over their airspace lol

@borreLore

Жыл бұрын

No kidding. If there was a nuclear war, there would be no silence from nuclear armed countries. They would all be like "Oh shit oh shit LAUNCH THE MISSILES" and just fire them off wherever. There would probably be a good incentive to target other countries that are a threat even if they didn't fire at you because those countries would be untouched while hundreds of your cities are burning.

@Steven-cf1ty

Жыл бұрын

Violating the airspace for military purposes would probably be an act of war if it's ICBMs in the air, but they would probably be able to detect if the missiles are on a trajectory to impact them or another country.

@kupus6622

Жыл бұрын

'blyat!'

@Fr4Ged

Жыл бұрын

@@Steven-cf1ty I am pretty sure that ICBMs operate above the "legal airspace" of those countries. But yeah, they would try to shoot them down anyways.

@ToniMorton

Жыл бұрын

@@Steven-cf1ty i assume russian detection systems would not be able to accurately estimate the trajectory until it reaches top of its arch. not to mention MIRVS are independently targetable i envision they would just launch..

as a person that lives in Alaska, we won't miss you either.

What is this simulator I would love to get it

I miss that intro you used to have in your videos

Gotta do a NATO vs REDFOR (CN, RU, NK)

Everyone always focuses on the initial deaths from impacts, fires and radiation, but the bulk would die over a period of a few months. Radiation sickness would claim a a lot, but billions would end up dying to starvation alone. All of the critical infrastructure and logistics would have entirely broken down, food wouldn't get to where it needs to go. Africa alone, despite not even being touched by a nuclear war, would probably shrink by half a billion if not more from lack of food imports and aid.

what is the name of the "game" ?

we will all be stunnned for a day when it starts

@pyrobarbu6173

10 ай бұрын

but no longer than that because after we will die from global fallout through the whole world (except if you're chinese because odds are that you'll be already dead lucky bastard)

you forgot to include the treaty countrys with china and the usa

“Ain’t gonna miss em!” - best comment ever.

you should try and do a complex event, where the US/NATO clash with BRICS nations and its allies. should be interesting.

@TheBlackB0X

Жыл бұрын

This is the likely occurrence, but he's probably saving it for a final segment lol

@cpi3267

Жыл бұрын

BRICS???????????? it's an economic group

@galgonite312

Жыл бұрын

Brics is a economic alliance it has nothing to do with military

@changedpace9169

Жыл бұрын

​@Galgonite yes but outside of India it's basically who we will fight in ww3

@victorpena3129

Жыл бұрын

It will look like this but more one sided when US Launches it’s missiles stored in Europe

what about China, Russia, NATO, US in different combinations??

Subed for the not missing Portland comment alone. Lol

What game is this

“In 2025” Bruh, that’s two years and one of the countries are us 😂

Portland and Seattle won’t be missed? 10:01

So confident, come and try, do you have the guts?

Hi @TheDevildogGamer can you do a India VS Pakistan nuclear conflict please??? I love your videos ❤️

I would miss Washington and Oregon I live here LOL but I would love to see a close up of the projected wind patterns and the fall out in the Northwest. Thanks.

Haha portland gone. Aimt gonna miss em had me dying

guam being nuked 18 times is quite concerning xD

When you have 3000 nukes blowing up and you say you got out of it waaaaaaaaay better than they the other part…

People who live in Seattle watching this with me included be like ✌️ seeee ya later 😂

You would be from port saint Lucie with a morbid fascination with nuclear war and MAD. 😉

I would survive anything (knock on wood)

Think its a possibility for them to be lieing about what they really have?

US vs Russia and China would be cool

There's also inda vs China or India vs Pakistan

As an alaskan, i will definitely miss me 🙄

The Chinese ones would probably mostly work, the Russian ones, I'm not so sure.

2025? Let's just do it now.

Hey I'm in Florida too. Over by Melbourne

Do India vs Pakistan. That's the most likely scenario for a nuclear exchange. Also both countries have insane population density

This software solution is not a sound assessment of a nuclear exchange between China and the US. The Chinese mostly have megaton grade warheads and would deploy those mostly against cities were any nuclear weapon deployed on its mainland at this level of volume. It's unclear what their stockpile really is, there's evidence to suggest they have more than it reported. The Chinese definitely have rockets of several makes that can reach effectively all the entire continental US at this point, not just the west coast. However, from a counter-value standpoint, striking "just" the coastal cities would do tremendous damage to US, and I wouldn't think it would be able to recover from that strike, not as a world power. All of innovation and mindshare of the country are effectively concentrated along the West and Northeast. Furthermore, the targeting schedule the computer picked is absurd, given how many missiles were deployed on an asset like Guam. Very likely, the US government would collapse at the very least after the exchange, as continuity of governance assessments from the Nixon Era concluded just 30% to 40% damage to key urban environments would like prevent continuity of governance. Lastly we need to have secondary effects from nuclear winter modeled, hopefully the developer implements those soon.

@Techno_Idioto

Жыл бұрын

I mean, you can make your own, more realistic, scenario if you really want to. Nobody's stopping you.

@TheDataWorkshop

Жыл бұрын

@Techno Idioto working on it

Are u sure the world stays intact. ?

With their current arsenal, China wouldn't bother with military targets. They would go for maximum civilian casualties. They don't have enough missiles to disarm the US to prevent their own destruction, and since they would be destroyed, hitting conventional military targets would be useless. They would try to do as much damage as possible by hitting as many cities as possible.

@florinivan6907

Жыл бұрын

The problem is the US mirror images other countries. Disarming first strikes require not only at least an equal(actually more) number of nukes but a huge intel collection system. Only the US has a trully global system and even that is partially held up by US allies. The chinese would most likely conduct strikes on air force and naval installations including reserve plus obviously the US capital which strangely was not targeted. If you take a map and look up where those are located most are near urban centers. A strike only focused on these would devastate scores of large and medium sized cities killing upwards of 25 million and crippling the US as a country. To give just a couple of examples the combined population of the Honolulu Seattle Norfolk and San Diego metro areas where the 4 largest naval complexes and several other military installations are located is close to 9 million. LA has a Space Force base next to LAX. The second largest US city is pretty much a target just because of that.The US keeps talking about the silos because that's how the US hopes an enemy would fight. Nuking the silos means US bases on both coasts are in one piece. It seems though that US adversaries have noticed this fact and are only looking at the coastlines.

@ajaykumarsingh702

10 ай бұрын

China's current arsenal is unknown and many reports have claimed for years that China easily has 1200+ nukes in its active arsenal. Considering their industrial prowess that surpasses the combined Western world, I think that might be true indeed.

@hydra70

10 ай бұрын

@@ajaykumarsingh702 No, we have a pretty good idea how large their arsenal is. It's about 400 warheads. They are currently undergoing a massive expansion though.

Just while usa lounched a big plane ofensive and flyed ower russia ı heard bounch of planes outside 😟

Please place someone in Texas too next time 😂🙏

does it model ballistic missile defence?

@TheDevildogGamer

Жыл бұрын

Yes but we have 40 something GBIs not worth it

@weaponizedace3231

Жыл бұрын

@@TheDevildogGamer oof, but with someone like Russia who has alot of GBIs and SAM sites would that make a big difference?

@TheDevildogGamer

Жыл бұрын

Sams cant intercept ICBMs and they have like 5 ABMs around moscow

@weaponizedace3231

Жыл бұрын

@@TheDevildogGamer damn, I thought Russia had purpose built S-300 sites for BMD, also are the ABM sites built into the ground like a silo or are they mobile? Also I'm pretty sure sams can intercept the reentry vehicles when they are coming down at like mach 69 and can't turn cuz they are too fast

@weaponizedace3231

9 ай бұрын

@@FunnyVideoCollector but cant it target them before they split, and even if they do split they must get some of them

this is a simulation based on China having only "250" nuclear missiles (since the 1970's). You think CHina still has only 250 ?

You should try USA 🇺🇸 vs. North Korea 🇰🇵 Nuclear War (even though the outcome may be pretty obvious)

The US West Coast will really be toast in this scenario.

That's a lot of fried rice.

Why do the Us nuke subs get sunk by some Chinese subs if cinvrntiknabweaoons

Any nuclear war is scary, Brainiac.

Do if North Korea launched one at like south Korea like they always say they will do

@Techno_Idioto

Жыл бұрын

Result is pretty obvious: NK gets fucking glassed.

@kevenmiles7121

Жыл бұрын

@@Techno_Idioto hah definitely I was just wondering if they could land any back before that

Can you do either India and Pakistan, or the US and north Korea pleaseee

Hello vault TEC calling

it makes zero sense to engage in nuclear war. zero.

In every scenario we germans are very screwed.. 😢

Why not? Just for good measure!

Try India vs China, it's more "balanced" and also realistic

Lmfaooo they made that naval base a non nuclear priority to flex the us navy

Once the missiles are out of their silos, are they vulnerable to emp?

@Heggy420

Жыл бұрын

i was wondering this awhile ago, wonder if they could detonate a emp device in space and potentially stop them?

@PianoMan-hx3ev

Жыл бұрын

@@Heggy420 That would be GREAT.

@victorpena3129

Жыл бұрын

At a budget of 700 billion a year for decades I highly doubt the US doesn’t have a counter emp or hypersonic interception capabilities

@muzaharsherazi8419

Жыл бұрын

​@@victorpena3129 as if every thing is went into military gear development and not in the industries deep pockets.

excuse me I live right by portland :(

Could you please do a China & Russia vs U.S. . Also, could you add more people in each country , in the cities & countryside

@nfaisnfgay

Жыл бұрын

Yeah that’s the most likely scenario

@Techno_Idioto

Жыл бұрын

I actually simulated that with this software. Result? *Everyone dies.*

Peter 2 - 3:10 - "But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, and the earth also and the works therein shall be burned up."

How anauuy with Russia?

Nothing aimed at Australia? That doesn’t seem right

@florinivan6907

Ай бұрын

Its really weird how it goes for targets in Germany and Europe and not Australia. It makes no sense to waste valuable ICBMs for targets in Europe. Especially since there's only a handful of US nukes in Europe. The AI has some obvious flaws. It also overdoes strikes on Guam. Guam is important but a basic rule of thumb about countries with few nukes. They want to make them count and maximise body counts. It seems the AI tried to adapt presumed russian strategies but for someone with relatively few nukes.

Where are the nuclear submarines of china and usa

I’d rather be ruled by GPT5 after seeing this

okay, lets start nukear war

Be realistic do BRICS nation members vs nato members

Even with the catostrophic losses China would still have over 700 million people left. Unreal

@josh7352

8 ай бұрын

don't forget the fallout, lasts up to centuries.

No winners, no matter.

I guess the number of nuclear missles from a certain point of view is irrelevant. Wouldnt a few strategic missles be enough for nuclear winter and kill 99 percent of human life?

@Mosoman42

Жыл бұрын

No

@JamesSmith-ix5jd

Жыл бұрын

lol 99% is not possible even if all nukes are used. humanity survives regardless, but it will be thrown back in time for 300 years if not more.