The fact that the Chinese felt the need to handicap US forces really says something lol

@XIXCentury

Жыл бұрын

you guys got handicapped by the taliban

@noahpaquet8357

Жыл бұрын

Bunch of sissies

@arthurofalsen2110

Жыл бұрын

right? I was thinking that maybe this is a best-case China scenario where the creator was just trying their damn best to see under what circumstances would China win.

@thewitherchannel1053

Жыл бұрын

check out the workshop man, crazy OP scenarios for China in most cases. the Chinese CMO community live in a world of their own

@YTStopCensoringFreedomOfspeech

Жыл бұрын

@@thewitherchannel1053 it's called patriotism. Americans also like seeing their own country win wars too. Look how devested the US public was when they thought they lost the war in Vietnam.

*Moderately realistic military games/simulations that can fairly help determine possible outcomes of battles between nations* China: "We don't do that here"

@yuanyuanxi262

Жыл бұрын

Your country lost in a simulation, boo hoo 😂

@blamalam7257

Жыл бұрын

That's why China would be an idiot to use such an artificially lopsided scenario like this seriously 🙄

@yuanyuanxi262

Жыл бұрын

@@blamalam7257 nah, they have full reason to because your idea of “lopsided” is just a cope. America’s military is degraded and you just don’t want to accept that 😁

@JJONES7

Жыл бұрын

@@yuanyuanxi262 degraded how? We still have all the latest technologies and still continue to progress. in the video there was a clear lack of supplies and the absolute worst re arm times. The US military is known for having great logistics. The simulator is clearly biased to handicap the US where it shines best.

@yuanyuanxi262

Жыл бұрын

@@JJONES7 obviously not because your military leadership is incredibly corrupt. This isn't even considering how your politicians are "lobbied" by arms dealers to buy the shittiest domestically produced weapons at a mediocre price, along with how your country is losing its ability to "project" itself worldwide. Nice try though :)

I would watch a less skewed version of the same mission

@TheDevildogGamer

Жыл бұрын

Im gonna try but they are very hard to make

@AmbiguousEntity

Жыл бұрын

@@TheDevildogGamer you got this bro

@khoaanh2224

Жыл бұрын

Hypops have one with good narration too

@kordellswoffer1520

Жыл бұрын

@@TheDevildogGamer could you do other nations like the uk vs France or is it just like a handful of nations in specific scenarios.

@patricksutfin9374

Жыл бұрын

@@kordellswoffer1520 It is pretty much any country and almost all their know platforms you can create a Egypt vs. Chile engagement if you wanted to. (just an example)

The fact that they had to handicap the Unites States this much .. shows us just how confident they are in their own forces.

@vickomen3697

Жыл бұрын

That's pretty much what the US does lol.

@xelabadman5824

10 ай бұрын

@@vickomen3697US actually does the opposite they take all claims of their enemies at face value and will advance our technology to the point that’s it’s even better than whatever our enemies were lying about

@theonefrancis696

8 ай бұрын

I mean, Russia went through Ukraine like they were on a parade and they got their asses kicked. Guess it happens with every major power with strong internal propaganda.

@sowianskizonierz2693

5 ай бұрын

@@vickomen3697yeah all the ameritards like to ignore the fact they fail at wargames without handicapping their enemies

@garrettfulks2932

4 ай бұрын

@@vickomen3697Lol no they don’t. Most wargames are set up to have the U.S. lose.

This would be a horrible war if it really happened

@douglascampbell9809

Жыл бұрын

I think the mission is written to try to prove that point as a form of propaganda. Real world you can bet the US sub fleet would be far more involved.

@dechezhaast

Жыл бұрын

It is well that war is so terrible, otherwise we should grow too fond of it

@travisbaker7867

Жыл бұрын

☢'when'☢

@jzadams5818

Жыл бұрын

Water is wet

Why not remake the scenario with proper range values and such? I'd definitely watch it.

@IN10SEGAMING

Жыл бұрын

Because it would be a boring stomp

@TheDevildogGamer

Жыл бұрын

Making scenarios in CMO is extremely time consuming

@MrLM002

Жыл бұрын

@@TheDevildogGamer I'd imagine so.

@MultiMates7

Жыл бұрын

@@TheDevildogGamer just get someone who knows what their doing to do it for you

@jamestalbot1647

Жыл бұрын

@@TheDevildogGamer dude you seriously need to learn how to play this game. Stop rushing like a kid on sugar. Set up proper coverage with air radar, set out proper air patrol

I would definitely love to see a version of this scenario where its more accurate to what might happen. More realistic ranges, more than one person on the carrier's flight deck rearming the aircraft so it doesn't take 5 hours. I wanna see in as close as you can get to a true to life one on one.

Someone needs to write this mission scrubbed of all the Chinese bias.

@GetOffMyPhoneGoogle

Жыл бұрын

China is a paper 🐅

@ktrigg2

Жыл бұрын

Their propaganda is incredible.

@subjectc7505

Жыл бұрын

This is how Russia thought they'll invade Ukraine like this

@SpeCifiC0507

Жыл бұрын

@@subjectc7505 Except Ukraine is losing, so.

@subjectc7505

Жыл бұрын

@@SpeCifiC0507 both sides are losing, so

Devil: what is wrong with this mission?? Chinese mission maker: hold my opium.

@LaikaTheG

Жыл бұрын

*copium

I have a few questions: - did you run the scenario at 5x-max time speed majority of the time? - Did you attempt any SEAD operations on those coastal radar sites? -Did the scenario provide reserve aircraft and weapons stores you could load yourself? .

Please do more of these btw man. I really dig watchin you make vids on this simulator. Super in depth combat

Its weird that you had no Aerial refuel capabilities. as theres a Tanker squadron based out of Okinawa

I dig these types of simulations. I have watched your gaming for years.

IDK why but i belted out laughing when the terminator plasma rifle sound effect sounded off when the SAMs were intercepted by the AL-1.

Funny how the US doesn't have an X-37B in geosynchronous orbit over the combat zone. We don't even know what it does other than stay in orbit for 717 days.

@cutes-ud3gd

Жыл бұрын

that top secret sun

That's actually really funny they've changed it in their favour to make them look better. Really does mirror their actions overall. I know self affirmation is a thing, but come on China 😂 your fooling yourselfs

I’ve noticed a lot of comments saying they would like to see a scenario that is unbiased but the truth is sure you could craft a scenario that represents the reality of us doctrine and readiness but then what are you gonna do about the China side? How far do you tone it down? Would we fall into the same trap of self soothing? Well who knows I mean maybe with the proper intelligence data you could do it properly but that seems pretty hard to get a hold of…

@rickjames18

Жыл бұрын

At the very least make all sides equal in skill even if we know US pilots train more. It would also be nice if the missions didn't seem like a 5 year old planned them.

@LaikaTheG

Жыл бұрын

@@rickjames18 Wdym? A 5 year old would never be dumb enough to send two e2s without any sort of fighter cover full well knowing j20s were operating in the area!

Devil you've got to find a better scenario. I'd love to see another more realistic scenario.

The biggest test for China is their ability to secure their trade. If they can no longer import food and fuel, and are also unable to export large amounts due to a naval blockade(thay can be thousands of miles away from the chinese coast) I don't know how they expect to win a full scale war.

@batboy555

Жыл бұрын

Which was Japan's issue in ww2

@alexanderchen6373

Жыл бұрын

you realize China has enough nukes to destroy the planet at least once right? if you are talking about full scale war?????

@camamations1573

Жыл бұрын

@@alexanderchen6373 I think he means a conventional war. Obviously both China, and Russia, have a extremely large amount of nuclear weapons. However that is mostly a last ditch effort at a win, considering that using said weapons, would be very likely to cause full retaliation from the US, and other NATO countries, resulting of the destruction of their own country as well. But as shown in the Ukraine war, bluffing to the other country that you'll just use nuclear weapons is a terrible idea. Unless you are severely losing to the other country, and want to take them down with you, then maybe you might want to use nuclear weapons. In a actual war however, you would need a substantial conventional war force, if you want to actually win, and not just destroy both competing countries in nuclear annihilation.

Love these vids

I've seen this scenario played out in DCS on the grim reapers YT channel, it makes for a much longer vid, but I think it's more realistic and no so slanted in china's favor.

I don't understand why anyone would create such a heavily biased setup, though. I mean if you really want to use this to test military theory, aren't they just shooting themselves in the foot? Basing doctrine on wishful thinking does not strike me as a sound strategy.

@swiftycortex

11 күн бұрын

I think the US makes a habit of handicapping themselves to figure out what is possible. I've been told nothing valuable is learned when you go out with all of the advantages, it's only when you hinder yourself that one can glean useful info. It's like Jack White being in the habit of not keeping an extra guitar pick with like most other guitarists. If they drop their pick they have a backup, but he sets the stakes much higher, so if he drops his pick he has to walk to the back of the stage to get another one, completely sucking. However, he knows the stakes are higher and plays bangers. Same for the US miltary

So basically you had a Chinese command structure controlling the operational plan?

@nikoc8968

Жыл бұрын

yup...and the carrier fleet still survived without losing a single vessel beyond the detached subs.

Play more of this, very interesting!

Amazing video

Loved watching this i would love to see you do more realistic battles like an iran vs usa war or even a russia vs nato fight. Keep up the good work devildog iv been watching since the start of the dayz stuff.

Yes, surface to air missile shooting over an island… that is basically a mountain in the ocean…. Makes perfect sense!

@desole784

11 ай бұрын

im thinking, aint taiwan gonna help us out there with there GIANT FUCKING ISLAND IN THE WAY

This made me think of me playing Starcraft with god mode thinking I'm really good

is it possible to edit your data files to a more realistic sim?

and remember, this isnt even considering inevitable Taiwanese, Japanese, South Korean, and Australian intervention.

These Chinese "little pinks" as they like to call themselves, making these scenarios is hilarious and also incredibly ridiculous. They had to cheat and still couldn't completely decimate the fleet.

@FrankieBoyThe1NdOnly

Жыл бұрын

America gets smacked by farmers in sandals with 50 year old AKs... Pretty sure the most advanced nation on the planet can do serious damage especially in their own backyard

@alligatorwithwifi6111

Жыл бұрын

@@FrankieBoyThe1NdOnly Vietnamese and Cambodians>Chinese

@alberto148

Жыл бұрын

QED, look jason, you have a little pink in your comments.

@Yinzermakesvids

Жыл бұрын

@@FrankieBoyThe1NdOnly fighting against people in desert mountains isn’t exactly that easy.

@FrankieBoyThe1NdOnly

Жыл бұрын

@@Yinzermakesvids where you there?

I wish you would do both sides on autopilot for the whole war if possible (time condensed to maybe 10min).

Simulate two carrier battle groups. One to the south of Taiwan and one to the north.

I love these videos! Please make more combat simulations. Anything Ukraine related would be especially interesting.

I love the cmo vids, just got into it

Nice content

@FireTight

Жыл бұрын

just stop

The Taiwan Blitz scenario from the Chains of War campaign is a lot better

Simulating A Battle Between China and America! Difficulty: ☠☠☠ You will not survive ☠☠☠ THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU LET CHINA BUILD YOUR MICROCHIPS!

Lopsided or not, the thing with the F-35 going on insane routes to far away places to refuel is a problem of scenario building. One has to manually choose the home base of an aircraft so that it goes to the right place to refuel. I had that once in a scenario I built where 15 helicopters tried to land on the same frigate. All but the 2 for which it had space ran out of fuel and fell into the sea whilst being surrounded by several other ships to land on. The AI is stupid with some things.

From what I've seen of CMO, it unfortunately doesn't accurately simulate war conditions and non-combat inhibiters like corruption and poor maintenance. One point that I hate about CMO and China-lovers online is the cult of the DF-21. In reality it would be hard to get constant guidance from a TEL battery in southern china all the way to a CBG in the South China Sea or further out. Even then, weapons are usually less accurate than what the designers state, and I don't believe CMO takes into account the EWar advantage the USN carries(Our Electronic Warfare and jamming suites are innnsane from what I've seen of the UNCLASSIFIED reports, and offhand comments from those with TS clearance).

@alberto148

Жыл бұрын

all the df-21 fangirling is great news for the US in a wartime scenario.

@qweqwe5609

Жыл бұрын

There's also the issue of a lot of their weapon systems/vehicles having inaccurate (sometimes glaringly so) values compared to the real thing. And I can't blame them since their main focus is on their commercial sales, where they allow the customer (governments for the most part) to input whatever values they need to simulate for each unit. That's why there are things like no armor values on most modern tanks or ships (seeing as the dev team would have to make a guess at their values, why bother when their intended customer will end up inputting their own anyways).

@alexanderchen6373

Жыл бұрын

well the reality is US carriers never gets into DF-21D's range recently. You can check US carriers's track since 2020, see if any of the carriers enters DF-21D's range.And you can check US carrier's track before DF-21d was announced, see how close they were.

@IJN_Guy

Жыл бұрын

@@alexanderchen6373 You could also check reports of how accurate DF-21s are, especially against stationary targets. (As a little hint, several reports say they missed a stationary mock-up of an American Carrier by around 20 miles.)

@alexanderchen6373

Жыл бұрын

@@IJN_Guy 1. even if DF-21d's accuraccy is 0.1%, what i said about US carriers sailing out side of DF-21d's range still stands true, so what do you wanna tell us here? You think you are better than your carrier commandors and fleet commandors? 2. The real accuraccy of DF-21d is a military secret, either US nor normal Chinese ppl are able to reach it, I don't even need to google it to find out that your so called "report" is most likely came from US's ESTIMATE, and it's probably was more than 6 years ago. (As a little hint: In 5-6 years, China can do a lot of things and evolve to be a new country. China's grouwth is RAPID in every aspect, ((every 4-5 years I go back to China once and I always got shocked by its develepment in these 4-5 years)) meaning DF-21d could be DF-21e now. Any info about China 5-6 years ago are almost useless)

Surprised he didn't get to the point where nukes are launched

@TheRAMBO9191

Жыл бұрын

No nation would do that off the bat. Maybe Korea cause they have nothing to lose. They know their island are so small their military is not big enough to take others on.

Some of the workshop stuff is Japanese and Korean also.

Perhaps you coul solve the f35 refueling issue with a no-navigation zone over taiwan and taiwan strait

how do you set up a basic AI side vs AI side in game - i got to side and basic add units but couldnt find a correct way to to get the AI to fight each other?

You need to change the orders to your aircraft at the start of the scenario. You can't just let the AI fight it out. In terms of balance, it doesn't look that bad to me. You have a huge amount of F-15EX with AIM-260 JATM. I'm pretty sure I can beat this scenario on vanilla difficulty.

@desole784

11 ай бұрын

I was honestly thinking, I could prob beat this with a little optimizing if any at all, I might even do this shit tonight😂

So long as the US leaves all their missiles at home it should be a crushing victory.

so does this simulation not take into account logistic resupply system?

@qweqwe5609

Жыл бұрын

It can, that's just dependent on whether the scenario author added such a system in. Often it's abstracted/ignored as most scenarios don't run long enough for supply depletion to become a factor.

Command Modern needs to be played more. I'm looking to pick it up. Can we also make custom asset's? I have a few things on paper I want to see, work out in the real world.

@TheDevildogGamer

Жыл бұрын

They have a ton of hypothetical assests like the Naval F-117 etc etc

@qweqwe5609

Жыл бұрын

The developers of CMO purposely restricts editing the values of units or their weapons/sensors in the consumer version, that's only a feature of the commercial licensed version. And as far as I'm aware, they're only selling that to governments or corporate thinktanks, so the best Devil could do is add/remove weapons from existing units.

@subjectc7505

Жыл бұрын

@@qweqwe5609 dang wanted to test some aircrafts and a SAM system site I came up with

@patricksutfin9374

Жыл бұрын

@@qweqwe5609 You can also change sensors on existing platforms and the datalinks to make weapons work.

Keep it up

One thing the US is good at is war and having better equipment and tactics. China cannot compete tbh. That's not even including NATO and QUAD. America's power projection is unmatched.

@sleepyjoe4529

Жыл бұрын

I don't know how you can draw that conclusion --- and what basis has this been proven? America has lost or fled from every war they've started since WW2.

@_MikeJon_

Жыл бұрын

@@sleepyjoe4529 You clearly don't understand what I said for one. Nor do you understand what NATO or QUAD is. Nor do you understand that winning or losing a war is irrelevant. Experience is won either way. However America never really lost a war, we pulled out. We've never been defeated on our soil since 1812 and times have changed. Once we commit to a war in ww2 style, nothing can stop us. Especially China.

@jutea9858

Жыл бұрын

@@_MikeJon_ I mean, China obviously has no intention of fighting the US in the US. Taiwan is a small island next to China, and the US has to project its power from an ocean away (Japan is a little closer). For example, during the Korean War, China was able to drive the entire US (UN) army from the Chinese border to South Korea even with three times as many casualties as the US. Not to mention that China's capital was just butchered just ten years ago before the Korean War. The same is true of Vietnam, where the United States has rarely won outright in the Asia-Pacific region.

@DrywallMuncher_

Жыл бұрын

@@sleepyjoe4529 wrong, we've won Korea, Panama, Grenada, libya, gulf wars I and II, the invasion of Iraq, we kicked the Islamic state's ass in syria. Please do more research :)

@garrettfulks2932

4 ай бұрын

@@sleepyjoe4529 Sure we have. Read your history more not Russian propaganda.

HypOps did a really neat video like this, only it's more realistic. Might be a good example.

I didn't see the mid-range missiles anywhere

Setu up a realistically ballanced battle between China and the US ner Tiwan.

So much realism the scrapped YAL-1 is resurrected and is shooting down missiles hundreds of miles away😂

Do one with Australia and the us verse China or something like that it sounds interesting

Thanks for the warning….after that I didnt even stay

I agree.

I wouldn't necessarily say Russia bluffed about its weapon ranges. When Russia says stuff like "The S-400 has a range of 500km", what they mean is that they can hit a target 500km out under ideal conditions. These missiles are mainly designed to hit AWACS and tanker planes and force them to stay away from the frontline. If the target has any energy and maneuverability whatsoever, and knows the missile is coming, practical range drops drastically. The same is probably true for chinese, and yes, also for US missiles. The laws of physics do not care for nationality. And since a recent update (that i believe wasn't out when this scenario was made), missile performance is a lot more realistic.

Awesome

Taiwan itself has lots of weapons and forces, but it does not show up at all in this video. Weird.

These battles really are based on faulty assumptions that the Chinese Military is actually capable of running intense long term battle sorties and battle management. 1) Corruption and Bribes in the Chinese military are far worse than in Russia and that is never taken account of. - Will they actually have the resources claimed? Likely not to sustain a hostile engagement. 2) They have ZERO combat experience for their Officers, let alone lower enlisted. They barely have an NCO Corp because that concept wasn't originally in the Chinese Military. They are trying to adapt it now, but that will take year to build up. Plus most authoritarian regimes really don't want lower level Sgts and other enlisted making battlefield decisions. 3) Their naval capabilities - I.E. Aircraft carriers are garbage. At the moment, they can't even launch 4th and 5th generation planes off the decks of their carriers with ordinance because the engines are too small. The J-20 can't carry much munitions. Supposedly it has a newer engine and could launch from the new Aircraft Carrier because it uses a similar (stolen tech) launch system as the US. However, that new carrier is at least 5 years out from actual service and another 5 years because they have enough training to run the type of sorties the US does on a routine basis. 4) Sea Lift/Air Lift capacity. China has stolen and made "copies" of some of the US' airlift aircraft like the C-5 Galaxy. But they still only have about 3000 total aircraft. Their airlift capacity is very small compared to the US. So, again is their sealift capacity. They would have to repurpose civilian car transporters and ferries to even come close to having enough transport capacity just to invade Taiwan and they still don't have enough capacity. 5) Army equipment - most of China's army is lightly equipped and just like Russia, their logistics is full of corruption. China also doesn't have it's own oil to keep it's troops moving and it's airplanes in the air. They import all of their oil from Russia, US, and Middle East. Cut off the US and Middle East supply and Russia won't be able to supply them enough for sustained military operations. 6) Coal - Most of China's energy production for electricity is STILL done with Coal. In fact, they are increasing their use of coal while claiming to be building other forms of energy production. Most of their coal comes from Australia. Cut that off and they will likely have major issues with electricity. They already are having major issues with keeping lights on. Can't keep lights on, can't keep up with replacing wartime equipment losses. I could go on, but China is much much weaker than a lot of people actually think because the US media is almost all bought off by China. Oh and their economy is about to crash and then their entire population will crash to about 600M by between 2040 to 2050. About the time their current President wants them to be the world's superpower. Their own population crash will prevent that. Along with major companies moving manufacturing out of China and to other Southeast Asia countries like Vietnam.

@blee04524

Жыл бұрын

kids so salty 🤣

@thewitherchannel1053

Жыл бұрын

China is the next Russia, militarily speaking. inexperienced soldiers, corruption and 'made in China' tech is the recipe for the next military disaster of this century

@regularmontana8515

Жыл бұрын

My friend stop smoking whatever you see

@Nightfighter82

Жыл бұрын

Do the research and then come back you commies.

@MartinRichardi

10 ай бұрын

interesting análisis, but from where the fuck you think china will lose half their population in 30 years??!!??!!

Why would a fleet go down the South China Sea while at War for destroying everything that would oppose it?

5 b-2'S in Australia as well.

Is this sim pretty accurate actually? Like if you setup Russian invasion of Ukraine, would it play out even slightly reminiscent of the actual events? I mean I wouldn't expect it to be 1:1 but even somewhat similar would be impressive.

@qweqwe5609

Жыл бұрын

It would take a lot of work to even remotely simulate that properly, especially considering the consumer version of the game doesn't handle the human element too well. The most of that it goes into by default is just a debuff/buff to unit proficiency. There's also more mundane, but important things it skips over (like the issue of no weather simulation, some forms of intelligence gathering, the effects of losing command and control elements, and some core issues with weapons/sensor stats). Some of those things can be worked around via scripting, but that'll never be optimal, may not always work, and is very labor intensive as it needs to be done per scenario.

@TheDevildogGamer

Жыл бұрын

We already did it

@qweqwe5609

Жыл бұрын

@@TheDevildogGamer I mean, unless you did another, far more indepth scenario on stream or something, I wouldn't say the other CMO videos you've released did what this guy is asking about. They were more of fun "what if" scenarios and/or hyperfocused on specific incidents/weapon systems. Not to mention being limited for performance reasons; CMO tends to chug real hard with several hundred units if you don't have a beast of a machine to feed it (let alone the several thousand you'd need for a proper "true to life" Ukraine War scenario).

What’s up Broski 🦋,

How hard do you have to cope to not have tankers in a war sim. Like they really live in an entirely different world.

Love CMO, but there’s something seriously broken with the stealth characteristics in the game. Due the RCS of a F-35 an “on paper” S-400 shouldn’t be able to detect one until about 20-30NM out. And that’s if they’re the only thing in the sky at that time. With the massive chaos of battle like in this scenario, it would be very hard to pick out stealth aircraft from the general noise. I’ve also noticed the AI seems to know where your fleet is all the time. IRL there’s the horizon to deal with, ground based or ship based systems can’t see far over the horizon. Not sure how those billion ASMs can even target your fleet so far away, especially factoring in ECM. Edit: Reading tests on the CMO forums it appears stealth characteristics are more or less properly modelled. I think this scenario is extremely generous with the S-400 capabilities. The game though still has a too perfect picture of the fog of war.

Are there any ways to modify it to where we can win comfortably? 🤣🤣

That's just not fun when it's handicapped one sided. They are compensating for small peen. 😂If they were confident in their military they would put in the work to code out all details for both sides.

Love these but would love to see something a bit more realistic

@acestillwell98

Жыл бұрын

What I also wonder is how ground units would play into this. If we went to war with China like this, within hours Marines would be ready to land on their shore, the only thing they need is a pocket of safe air space to land and get a foothold.

Great

I have command, what scenario is this?

Wish this don't actually happen irl

What is this program?

never paid attention to how close taiwan is to china.

Age of Empires : Real Edition

We need a more reliable and realistic version, not a scenario the live in Chinese fantasy.

-1,000,000 social credits!

SO THIS IS THE 31ST MEU U ARE USING COVERING S/E ASIA??

I’m confused didn’t you used to have more subs did I miss something and this type of content might have something to do with the low views but I might just be tripping

0:28 Xi got the new power wheels

The following is just an educated guess ...an opinion. Since the goal of the US Navy would be to protect Taiwan, they would not sail so close to China's shoreline, I am sure they would position themselves eastward of Taiwan in deeper waters. As for China, their goal would be to silence Taiwan's air defenses for amphibious/aerial landings. So assuming China gets first strike, they would launch cruise missiles against any airfield that could operate military aircraft, including civilian airports. They would flood the sea area between mainland China and Taiwan with any ship able to shoot at an air target, while escorting landing craft across the strait. They would not directly engage US Navy warships if they could help it. While a carrier is a tempting target, a US Navy Nuclear submarine would be more valuable for message sending. That said, airborne US Navy assets would be on their menu. The Chinese Navy would only shoot at US Navy warships in self-defense or because those assets are threatening their AO/AR. The Chinese Navy would run interference against US Navy surface assets but would aggressively hunt US Navy submarines in the strait between the mainland and the island. Once Chinese ground troops reach Taiwan's soil, the US would have to commit ground troops, not likely to happen (In my opinion). Once mainland Chinese ground troops are on the island, the US Navy would work to harass re-supply units crossing the strait but diplomats would be working to cease hostilities, which would not include returning Taiwan to a sovereign state., in my opinion.

Where are all the hypsonic missiles? df 17 / 21 / 27?

China is like a Pokemon or Magic player having all the best cards in the most competitive stack youve ever seen...but dont know how to actually use them to play the game. xD

Is this Dane Cook?

Epic

Most modern war games make it almost impossible to beat Chinese or soviet ships aircraft etc. This game, Coldwaters, soviet or Chinese ships, aircraft take out U.S. ships, aircraft 100% of the time with ease. In reality look how easy it has been for Ukraine to take out Russia's ships

@nicologiani3426

Жыл бұрын

Well, if you try to simulate sinking of Moskva in this game, is quiet easy to sink it. Less easy if Moskva has all sensors on, but definitely possible.

@neymarjr_.

Жыл бұрын

@@nicologiani3426 ofc they had US intelligence aka CIA

Except the branded yanke USA, no one in earth will attack a carrier battle group win war plane, at first you can expect a handed of hypersonic missiles.

Nice

Hi boys!

China would shoot ground to air missiles instead of a2a combat.

Durka Durka China get FUCKKKKKEDDDDDDDD

Hope this is the model Xi uses so he can get rug pulled

I think the guy playing doesn't understand Soviet systems were fairly accurate at striking many targets if the crew understand how to operate it. China would theoretically render any american unit's in the area null, and the only way America would win is by drawing in other nations to make up for the huge supply distance should all current regional unts be exhausted. It's not a China bias, it's a ground reality that our NATO guys would be basically caught out.

Simple. China has 2 Aircraft carriers. We have 11. The two largest airforces in the world is the U.S Airforce and U.S Navy. The most advanced carriers in the world belong to the U.S and have classified top speeds. So if China wanted to nuke one. Assuming ample warning. Would use that top speed and get out of the blast radius and survive. Whoever owns the sky and seas will win a war. We saw it with WW2 where after the battle of Midway. Japan lost all their carriers and it was all downhill for them after 1942. They never had the upper hand again. While it is wise not to be overconfident with that 11 carrier force. People need to realize that Chinese made planes, ships and tanks are poorly made, with less advanced technology than our 5th gen fighters and they don't fly nearly as much as American planes. Our Airforce and Navy is always flying and training for war every single day. Does China do the same? Nope. They can't afford the fuel to fly hundreds of planes for training at every base per day. Plus America has fighting experience over the past two decades. While counter insurgency is not the same as large scale warfare. It is combat experience nonetheless. How many wars has China been involved in the past few decades? None. They have this huge army with no combat experience. While we got battle hardened men who have seen hell in different countries. I'm not saying they'll bend like paper. Fighting China would be a bloody war that would probably kill hundreds of thousands (if nuclear would kill millions) but they wouldn't be this big bad unstoppable fighting force. The only way they'd get the upper hand on America is if they did what Japan did and hit us with a massive coordinated surprise attack. Which in the 21st century with Satellites, Radar, Intelligence and early warning systems. There would likely be no surprise attack like Japan did with Pearl Harbor.

I wonder if Chinese players really think that these scenarios are realistic or do they think it’s cap as well.

Since when did Russia bluff? Or China for that matter. They both have hyprsonics, US just cancelled it's program.

Not sure why you wanted to use this for this. The Chinese equipment has not be battle tested. They, just like Russia, bark, bark, bark with very little bite. Why in the world would the carrier group be sailing through the Taiwan Straight during a conflict? There is no way it would get that close. I don't think I can watch it. The fact that the Chinese made this is ridiculous and again, why in the hell would you even want to use this?

So the Chinese made game shows the Chinese would win a war against the world's largest military power. You don't say?

Hello!