Thank you to Holzern for sponsoring this video. Support our channel by visiting www.holzkern.com/thearmchairhistorian to find the perfect gift for your loved ones, and use our special discount code “armchair15” at checkout to receive 15% off on all products this holiday season! Sign up for Armchair History TV today! armchairhistory.tv/ Merchandise available at store.armchairhistory.tv/ Armchair Historian Video Game: store.steampowered.com/app/1679290/Fire__Maneuver/ Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/armchairhistorian Discord: discord.gg/thearmchairhistorian Twitter: twitter.com/ArmchairHist

@explodingwolfgaming8024

6 ай бұрын

We respect Holzern here!

@jacktmyt378

6 ай бұрын

@@explodingwolfgaming8024same

@lg6707

6 ай бұрын

We will all mostly be dead by 2049 so not sure why they're bothering

@chadczternastek

6 ай бұрын

That was one of the most enjoyable commercials I've seen on KZread. I just bought a G-Shock Master Of Mud watch had I seen this sooner I would of bought in a split second. It's gonna be workin my head I'm sure till I get one..or two.

@bskiez

6 ай бұрын

*2:14* I had no idea you had a wife and he's only 24yo. Glad you've made something of yourself.

I seriously don’t understand why KZread continues to punish its most prominent creators that upload studio-level productions. This was another great video by you guys, I hope you’re all looking forward to the upcoming holidays! Wishing you the best from Canada. Edit: Censoring the truth and our history is a mistake we have made as a species many times over. This comment wasn’t supposed to be political, but it’s shameful KZread and their advertisers prioritize profit, instead of propping up its creators who produce amazing educational/informative content on all subjects.

@VladimSandv4

6 ай бұрын

С Наступающим Новым Годом!

@horseshoethief242

6 ай бұрын

😅😊

@muscleman5133

6 ай бұрын

Remember if you give KZread money you stay no matter the situation. If you want a bonus you must not be under “racist KZread employees” who will just age restrict you for no reason or ban

@007ShaolinMonk

6 ай бұрын

KZread has offices in russia, probably in China too Money does not smell, and they will suck anything their sponsors ask to.

@thesenate1844

6 ай бұрын

A reminder that all the established news networks were grandfathered in by KZread, the usual rules don't apply to them and they thus monetize all their videos covering naughty topics like the latest mass shooting.

You forget to mention that PLA still has political commissars at every level.Which is quite unique now consider Soviet Union get rid of theirs and in the end couldn't control their own military.

@tanjeeschuan4999

6 ай бұрын

It's weird that both PRC and ROC has political commissars in their military

@michaildubinin515

6 ай бұрын

U forgot to mention Soviet Union declined comissars in 1942 and won ww2 without political commanders, that became battle commanders or privates depending to their abilities. Also Red Army accepted officer system in 1943, almost the same as in Russian Empire.

@davesthrowawayacc1162

6 ай бұрын

So does the Imperial guard and the 40k Ultramarines, and they're the most effective fighting force in the universe

@Tomas-gw6rd

6 ай бұрын

​@@tanjeeschuan4999this is effectively how all modern militaries work. Socialist states are just open and direct about it while liberal states put up pretenses of being otherwise. You couldn't be an open Communist in the US military if the US had a serious and powerful Communist movement for the same reason the Chinese aren't interested in letting globalist aligned liberals into their army. It's a direct threat to Chinese sovereignty in general, not just the CPC

@mkvenner2

6 ай бұрын

actually the soviets didn't get rid of political officers the simply changed the name and their precise duties.

Another installment in the modern military series. Hell yeah! Can’t wait to see you cover the US

@pabcu2507

6 ай бұрын

I’ll wait for the day he does one on Luxembourg, the most powerful nation on earth

@chickenwarriorr

6 ай бұрын

Men's nipples are better than women's

@conservativecatholic9030

6 ай бұрын

@@pabcu2507Naw, if he is going to do that he needs to cover the military capabilities of Vatican City. Lol

@56V6G6

6 ай бұрын

This video almost covers the US military more than the PLA lol

@Uncle228

6 ай бұрын

@@conservativecatholic9030nah, the Great Sealand.

It's kind of ironic that the west both label China as aggressive but also laugh at China for not having enough combat experience since they haven't fight a war since 1979.

@liliya225

6 ай бұрын

However, the reason why China lacks combat experience is that they don't need and have no idea of foreign aggression at all. For them, it is more important to protect their country and quickly organize forces to rescue in earthquakes, plagues and forest fires.

@juniopradana4003

6 ай бұрын

Because that''s a typical propaganda tactic. Saying your adversary aggressive but not competent at the same time. Powerful and simultaneously weak.

@ne0nmancer

6 ай бұрын

Both can be true, they are very agressive when enforcing the nine-dash line, for example. Doesn't mean they have combat experience as you'd find in an actual combined arms war.

@jrherita

6 ай бұрын

I mean they are doing brinksmanship around Taiwan, and also sending ships into Japanese waters occasionally. That’s aggressive.

@dongren8620

6 ай бұрын

The experience of the United States is also to bully some small countries. These experiences lack reference significance in dealing with countries with comparable strength.

"Suffered heavy losses but were able to gain support from the Soviet Union" Is selling the chinese in the Korean War short. They had a lot of interesting tactics to counter superior US firepower and arguably a better grasp of the operations part of war.

@enriqueperezarce5485

6 ай бұрын

Not really they were fighting a way superior opponent who had every advantage, I will admit tactically and sometimes strategically they would do some good maneuvers (Chosen being the biggest highlight) other then that it was very attritional, the loses they incurred basically stoped any hope of a Taiwan invasion for a very long time

@aroonsubway2079

6 ай бұрын

@@enriqueperezarce5485 Taiwan's official name is Republic of China (ROC), according to its own constitution. ROC and PRC are still in a civil war situation.

@stevenchan8211

6 ай бұрын

@@enriqueperezarce5485 I mean the fact that the Chinese managed to fight the US to a stalemate while contributing the majority of the boots on the ground says something. Especially when you consider that contrary to the narrative of human waves, by the end of the war the number of Chinese and UN troops in Korea was pretty similar. I think people are quick to point to Soviet support for why they were able to do so, but there's only so much air power can do to affect the outcome of a war.

@ianshaver8954

6 ай бұрын

They did have the incredible advantage of being on the same continent as the war they were fighting.

@ziyueguan3430

6 ай бұрын

@@enriqueperezarce5485 At that time, Korea was a way more important than Taiwan was. I mean US had the airpower for the whole duration, so the PLA knew this very much that this could be very attritional.

Well I was expecting to see how uniforms from ancient China evolved into what they are today. But still this video was a good one to listen too. So nice job.

@kongqiyiwang

6 ай бұрын

The video has to be an hour, from the Shang Dynasty to the present, 4000 years

@brokenbridge6316

6 ай бұрын

@@kongqiyiwang---And a lot of research would likely go into it as well. But if done right.. I wouldn't mind watching it. Even if it's an hour long.

@BaguettePair

6 ай бұрын

​@@brokenbridge6316Not a lot of people would though

@brokenbridge6316

6 ай бұрын

@@BaguettePair---I'm not most people

@Douchey_Elkmen

6 ай бұрын

@@BaguettePair we the special people, we don't care about most people's opinions on a certain niche

As soon as the notification pops up I stop what I’m doing and watch. Love y’all’s work!

If you’re China when it comes to military build up you’re stuck in a dilemma. If you build up your military of course your rivals aren’t going to like that. But if China doesn’t build up its military then it can be exploited by others. This isn’t even speculation, just look at China during the 1800s and 1900s. Warlords took control of the country, foreign powers established their spheres of influence, British opium planted in India flooded their black markets, and then of course Japan invaded numerous times. In other words, if China builds up its military it will be called a threat and if it doesn’t it will be threatened.

@Apple.CC.technomail

6 ай бұрын

There could be a simpler solution though. For example, instead of an aggressive build up they could try a steady and slow military buildup. Diplomatically speaking, aggressive wolf warrior tactics isn’t really helping them. Having a friendly and looking as non threatening as possible for as long as possible would’ve given them more time.

@Robsidians

6 ай бұрын

Us westerners also dont like the whole genocide of minorities thing.

@lolasdm6959

6 ай бұрын

@@Robsidians Does it remind them of themselves?

@LoveHammerMan

6 ай бұрын

@@lolasdm6959 Reminds us of ancestors, yes. Equally disturbing to see what's supposed to be a modern nation doing it...

@frankhill4358

6 ай бұрын

@@Apple.CC.technomail America has bases all over the pacific, including South Korea and Japan. How would a slow military build up make any sense? I mean imagine the reaction if China had major military bases in Mexico. China DID go the diplomatic route. Look at history! The diplomatic and friendly route hasn’t exactly worked for them seeing how the British flooded China with opium when trade wasn’t going their way or that Japan invaded them and committed some of the worst atrocities in history.

I kinda hope for this series to expand with, u.k russia, france, and japan

@zchen27

6 ай бұрын

With Japan picking up defense spending again, might be good to visit what Japan has in a few years.

@dirtysniper3434

6 ай бұрын

@@zchen27 dosent there no navy treaty also end soon? Or is that still up to the u.n?

@zchen27

6 ай бұрын

@@dirtysniper3434 There's no external Treaty, only Article 9 of the Constitution forbidding Japan from carrying out offensive war. Which can really be interpreted as loosely as you want.

@minhhieuchannel765

6 ай бұрын

I Hate Russia!

Excellent choice of subject! Excited about this one🎉

12:40 correction: 8 cruisers, or 0, depending on classification. PLAN classifies 055 as a destroyer by functionality, while the US classifies it as a cruiser by tonnage.

Thank you for your Information ℹ️ Armchair Historian 🙏🏼

5:33 Been a fan of yours from the start, never expected to see a Rajneekanth reference 😂😂

I've love to see you do videos on the 21st century wars in the Caucuses, like the South Ossetia war and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflicts.

@crashoveryu

5 ай бұрын

Too early to be thoroughly covered and studied without bias. Give it a decade or two and you might get a nice video or two.

Super interesting. Thank you!

Cant wait for more content!

truly a beautiful channel.

Great content as always. Got (almost) all the little details right.

@arandomwalk

6 ай бұрын

Can you perhaps elaborate?

Excellent work friend. Make a video and for the modern vietnamese army please.

Been watching for years now. Love your videos

9:10 lmao the hidden amogus on the clipboard

You really need to start adding more playlists I can save in my library!

Always learning new things from your videos. Love them.

If we could get a little text pop up with a source at some parts, this would be the best channel

3:00 "defending China and its neighbours" North Korea - Yes Pakistan - Ok Albania - wtf?

@aceflaviuskaizokuaugustusc8427

6 ай бұрын

Well it doesn’t exactly match up with what is being said. But it’s because China and the Soviet Union split along ideological lines with China seeing the Soviets as abandoning the Marxist-Leninists. And well Albania didn’t go along with the Soviets so yea China saw itself as defenders of their ideology.

@minhhieuchannel765

6 ай бұрын

I hate North Korea

@thomaszhang3101

6 ай бұрын

China actually gave a lot of weapons to Albania, for free, with zero political strings attached.

@davidw.2791

3 ай бұрын

Albania was calligning with China more after the mid 1960s. We hve the insane amount of economic gifts to show for it. 😅

@game_boyd1644

2 ай бұрын

You have Hoxha to thank for that

This is such a good and documented video. I will love to see if you do a video on India's modern military.

@mingmuyiyang8615

6 ай бұрын

I hope Indians can read carefully and experience with their hearts. The huge difference in the founding of China and India determines the biggest difference between India and China. Just look at the modern history of both countries and you will understand. India has been colonized by Britain for more than 200 years. In 1947, Britain experienced World War II, its strength declined significantly, and its status was replaced by the United States. India achieved independence through non violent and non cooperative means. In other words, India's independence has not undergone the test of blood and fire. Such an independent country lacks cohesion, willpower, and a sense of national identity. Now let's talk about China. Since the British defeated the corrupt and incompetent Qing government in 1840, the Chinese people have been living in dire straits. Various disasters and wars followed one after another. At that time, China was very poor and backward, suffering various humiliations. Including the cession of Hong Kong and Macau, Taiwan becoming a Japanese colony, the Eight Nation Alliance setting fire to the Old Summer Palace, and subsequent Japan's comprehensive and brutal invasion of China. In 1931, Japan launched a full-scale invasion of China. From 1931 to 1945, the war lasted for 14 years. The Chinese military and civilians rose up to resist, fought with blood for fourteen years, and suffered 30 million casualties, ultimately achieving victory. Do you know why there are so many casualties in China? There are hundreds of reasons, and I will only give an example of one phenomenon: Chinese troops are in conflict with Japanese troops. Often, if the number of Chinese soldiers participating in the war is 100, they only have 20-30 firearms. The remaining soldiers did not give up resistance or surrender. They bravely fought against the Japanese machine guns and cannons with machetes, steel forks, and wooden sticks until they sacrificed themselves. This spirit of facing death as if returning home and never retreating is the Chinese spirit. 30 million casualties! Do you think this can happen in India? For India, it is zero casualties because their knees are soft. India will soon give up resistance. Do you know why there was the Nanjing Massacre? Due to the desperate resistance of the Chinese military and civilians, they will never surrender or give up. After Japan captured Nanjing, firstly to vent its anger, and secondly to scare off other Chinese soldiers and civilians in resistance. However, the Nanjing Massacre not only did not deter any Chinese people, but also further aroused the resistance of the Chinese people. The establishment of New China has gone through the test of blood and fire. Do you know why the Chinese national flag is red? That's because the establishment of New China was bought with the blood of countless Chinese ancestors, and we Chinese people will always remember it. From 1945 to 1949, during the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang fled to Taiwan. Originally, the Chinese people thought they could live a peaceful life they had longed for, but in 1950, the Korean War broke out, lasting three years. The Chinese People's Volunteer Army successfully resisted the northward route of the United States without air superiority, sea superiority, outdated army equipment, and extremely poor logistics, at the cost of losing hundreds of thousands of brave People's Liberation Army soldiers. As for India's unforgettable and shameful 1962 Sino Indian War, in the eyes of us Chinese, it was not a war at all. Firstly, it only took 32 days. Secondly, from 1959 to 1961, China experienced the most difficult three years since the founding of the People's Republic of China, during which many people starved to death. In 1962, India's economy far surpassed that of China. Both the United States, the Soviet Union, and Britain support India. At that time, India implemented a "forward policy" and attacked China with elite troops. We Chinese people really don't want to go to war. The Chinese troops that participated in the war with India in 1962 were ordinary border defense forces, not regular People's Liberation Army. In China, soldiers are known as the "cutest people". There is a Chinese proverb: without a country, there is no home, and soldiers are the backbone of the country. Thank you to our brave soldiers of the People's Liberation Army who are always ready to defend the borders of our motherland. No matter how India develops its military, it cannot surpass China. Whether in the past, present, or future, China can always defeat India. This is determined by the history and culture of both countries. Chinese people value the spirit of dedication and sacrifice. Do not surrender, do not surrender, vow to resist to the death, and face death as if returning on the battlefield. If Chinese soldiers surrender on the battlefield, it would be a great shame, and the spirit of dying rather than giving up is deeply engraved in the bones of every Chinese person. These are all things that Indians do not possess. So, even now or in the future, India will never be able to defeat China. Now, do you think India can stand tall in the world like China? Absolutely impossible.

@J_X999

6 ай бұрын

I think India's military history has most of its ties with foreign powers. A lot of Indian military equipment is not Indian. That will take a while to get over, but I absolutely expect it to be achieved.

You know it’s going to be a good day when he uploads

I think you should do one for the American modern military history I think it would be great to compare and if you haven’t done it yet and I like watching this channels history it’d really be interesting just saying

I would love to see you talk about China’s paramilitary agencies like the militia and the people's armed police.

@supasek7597

6 ай бұрын

ไอ้พวกนี้มันก็แค่แนวหน้าอยู่แต่ถ้าขอให้เขาทำแนวหลังเขาน่าจะทำได้

@AN-jz3kf

6 ай бұрын

And the coast guard. We can add many more ships to the navy. Personal fishing vessels can be conscripted during war under laws passed at the beginning of the modernization process (I suppose to be used as transports? idk the value)

@user-ef5ib9xk8q

6 ай бұрын

they are the ones who did the oppression against Uyghurs and Tibetens

@RynoG2003

6 ай бұрын

@@AN-jz3kf The coast guard is part of the people's armed police and the maritime militia is the agency that uses fishing vessels.

@AN-jz3kf

6 ай бұрын

@@RynoG2003 ah. Thanks!

Always glad when you post something. its incredibly well put tohgether. its crazy lol

Thank you for your hard work. Much love

PLA actually didn't officially went into Korean war. It was the Chinese voluntary army, made by volunteers across the entire country at that time, including to farmers, workers, and active military personels, who went to the war.

@iforgottosignoutagain8181

6 ай бұрын

The CPC actually did want to interfere, as If the south won the war, the Americans and the west would be right at China's doorstep. It was called a volunteer army to lessen the perceived interference by the CPC.

@lifetrees1

6 ай бұрын

The KMT soldiers who surrendered after losing the civil war in 1949 were involuntarily volunteered to fight the Korean war as cannon fodder.

@TheHaydena76

6 ай бұрын

"Volunteered" is certainly one way to say it.

@huas5350

6 ай бұрын

BS!

@imadeanaccounttocomment7800

6 ай бұрын

⁠​⁠@rowdymacias9393I don’t get why being conscripts or volunteers would change the definition of it being a full military intervention. The Americans sent in a lot of draftees for Korea and still maintained that it was a police action.

Great video thanks

Love the video Griff. Was wondering if you have ever considered doing a video on the Mexican American War? Like your take on Mexico's Revolution and their history during WWI you did a few weeks ago. But a video on the Mexican American would be a great visual for my students if you ever do one.

I think a video on the modern British military would be quite interesting. Great video!

@cattysplat

6 ай бұрын

Cutting numbers. Gutting Royal Navy. More reliant on being a support for US forces. More aircraft carriers.

@p03saucez

6 ай бұрын

Definitely would be interesting but sad if you're even vaguely familiar with the British military of the past.

@NeostormXLMAX

6 ай бұрын

@@cattysplatus vassal nowdays

@Russian382

6 ай бұрын

Sorry, i think no one care or is interested in today's British military, because today's UK is just the USA's smaller brother.

Fun fact : The official name should be CPC (Communist Party of China），CCP was originally from western media, which they want people to relat it with CCCP, in UN they only use CPC, NOT CCP.

@ffff7164

6 ай бұрын

CCoPe

@horstnietzsche1923

Ай бұрын

Or CCP rolls off the tongue better? Plus CPC looks like PCP.

Great video! Is there going to be an evolution of Chinese uniforms coming soon too?

@dergberg3923

6 ай бұрын

if there is then I already feel bad for the researchers and artists. Imagine having to draw all the warlord and infighting governments' uniforms!

@silveriver9

6 ай бұрын

​@@dergberg3923🤡

@shanescatsandcannabisfarm2965

6 ай бұрын

​​@@dergberg3923it wouldn't be any harder than drawing any other uniform....

@muhalifakbarsuaib3977

6 ай бұрын

​@@shanescatsandcannabisfarm2965it's less on about the drawing of uniform, more so of the quantity

@kongqiyiwang

6 ай бұрын

视频必须是一个小时，从商代到现在，4000年

The background with the framed picture PLA soldier with the guns has me dying. 😂

Finally a video on the Chinese army. But why isn’t it an evolution army uniform video like that of the video on the Japanese, French, American, Russian, British, and German army videos? Edit: China's modernization didn't just begin under the communist and after the Korean War, China's army modernization had begun since the Self-Strengthening Movement in 1861, under the Qing Dynasty (China's last imperial dynasty). Ever since the self-strengthening movement, China has adopted western weapons and tactics.

@hughmungous786

6 ай бұрын

Prob doesn’t want to mention the millions upon millions of deaths that it took to reach the point where they are now. China doesn’t exactly have the cleanest history…

As a Chinese I have a question, that is, will American soldiers participate in the disaster relief?

@赣东北嗦粉仙人

5 ай бұрын

美军不捣乱就谢天谢地了😂

The video shows 07.In fact, as of last year, the PLA has been equipped with the latest type 21 training uniform.

Such a good video, high classed

This video will most likely reach an abundant number of views and likes, possibly a million.

Amazing and improving animation styles 👌

7:02 love the type 81 in the animation.

YOOOOOOOOOO niceeeeeee bro I'm so glad you're back

If possible, it would be great to see a video on the evolution of british aircraft

The quality of these videos keeps going up. Love to see it!

I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up

Could you do a video on the battle of Alaska in World War Two? It was the Japanese invasion launched alongside the battle of Midway. It’s a hugely overlooked part of the pacific war. The American and Canadian forces were outgunned and under supplied, facing a vastly superior Japanese force while equipped with only ww1 gear and ships. If the Japanese succeeded they could have stopped lend lease to the soviets and raided the west coast.

I wish they make spanish army uniforms

Keep it up guys!

are we able to get videos like this for historical armies (Napoleonic French, Victorian Britain etc)

Thank you for another installment! Any plans to showcase the Yom Kippur War?

@user-op8fg3ny3j

6 ай бұрын

October 7th

@SnakShaksClosed

6 ай бұрын

From the Palestinian perspective I hope

@crose1466

6 ай бұрын

​@@SnakShaksClosedwell, I'd hope he'd be objective.

@enriqueperezarce5485

6 ай бұрын

@@SnakShaksClosedtheir isn’t as huge of a Palestinian perspective as they weren’t a active player in the Yom Kippur war given that they didn’t exist for more then 2 decades at that time

@arjay5425

6 ай бұрын

i'd like to see this too honestly, a two part series, one video from the israeli, and another from the egyptian perspective. The Syrian perspective isnt as interesting in my opinion, as someone whose read a lot from generals from all 3 countries.

Absolute masterpiece. I never thought I’d watch a movie I loved more than Road Warrior and was worried when I heard this was coming out but man I was blown away. I hear people complain about it just being all action and no story but that’s a terrible misrepresentation. It’s an amazing story told with a few words as possible and that sets it apart from most modern flicks. Love George Miller and I hope he keeps the story going!

@dakotaDklunsford

6 ай бұрын

Did you comment on the wrong post? This is about china's lackluster military, not a lackluster movie.

Who draws thuse illustrations and the thumbnail? They are 🔥

Cool! A new video!

Could u do a modern miltary of a country like el salvador or mexico?they have both been changing rapidly to battle the cartel.

High quality content my friend❤

Might buy someone a watch for christmas hm

16:20 Nice use of mysterious stranger

The fact that we get free videos on KZread by The Armchair Historian is truly a gift. 👏👏👏👏👏

@semiramisubw4864

6 ай бұрын

You pay with your datas my man. YT is owned by google and google probably knows more about you than you mother.

I love this video! Please make a video for the Vietnamese army, as there is very little info on KZread!

Hey, Griff! Which hand do you wear your Holzkern watch?

Could you make a video about the Ogaden War?

@traditionalmusicoriginal2720

6 ай бұрын

dear my friend, where is Ogaden?

@christopherhoffer6643

6 ай бұрын

@@traditionalmusicoriginal2720 In Ethiopia

Idea: The history of the 2014-2015 Donbas Conflict

Great video!

I see this as an absolute win as i love learning more about modern Chinese history

@yuluoxianjun

6 ай бұрын

🤣

@f1ringfed

6 ай бұрын

👀

@loadingnewads

6 ай бұрын

China will disappoint you…It doesn’t like leaking data

@user-cy1zz7yq1l

6 ай бұрын

中国近代历史绝对是爽文一般的存在

@user-gf7eu5ys5c

4 ай бұрын

😅👉🤡​@@yuluoxianjun

8:03 This one, I feel is more of a case of mistranslation and a different cultural concept for how to classify 'army'. The word in Chinese is 'jun'. This somehow is translated to English to 'Army', which is not accurate since China classifies all top level military organizations to this word. So the more accurate translation should be 'military' or 'armed forces' which is exactly what they are. For comparison, see the Chinese names of the ROC military.

Love the ultrawide aspect ratio

9:15 omg it’s him. For everyone who doesn’t know there’s something on the paper

To be fair, the US hasn't had any experience fighting modern superpowers either.

@fireironthesecond2909

6 ай бұрын

In Ukraine?

@baneofbanes

6 ай бұрын

@@fireironthesecond2909the US isn’t fighting in Ukraine.

@lolasdm6959

6 ай бұрын

@@fireironthesecond2909Even if the US joined in Ukraine, I don't think fighting alocholic conscripts is the same as fighting China.

@MrkTan

6 ай бұрын

Yeah, but the US has more experience in warfare though

@aroonsubway2079

6 ай бұрын

I am confused by the comments. US was involved in multiple morden wars in the past decades, and they are regarded as the good guys and peace keepers? Just wondering what people on KZread want China to become ... if the youtuber said Chinese army is so strong, people will say "China is dangerous and bad", but if the youtuber said Chinese army is a joke and they don't dare to fight, people will still say "China is weak and bad" .... so it seems no matter what the Chinese are doing, they must be bad LOLLL

Great content as always guys! Thank you

Hey @TheArmchairHistorian I just subcribed today, can you make a video About the Philippine's Modern Military? Or The battle of Marawi. I would really appreciate it and I am really interested in watching it thank you.😊

I love the HoI 4 sounds references in this video!

These saying about "lack of experience" is popular in China: 1. China lack of experience, but who want to be the sparring? If you can't find the victim, the only thing can do in peace is drill. 2. Asymmetric warfare experience is not PLA need, at least for now. And lot of Chinese military fans think US goes to the wrong way of focusing on asymmetric warfare. 3. Unmaned weapon is a great solution, more sweat for less blood.

If Russia is a superpower then so is France and the U.K. and Japan

@hamzamahmood9565

6 ай бұрын

There's only one country that fits the superpower status... Everyone else is a regional power

@helmuthvonmoltke5518

6 ай бұрын

​@@hamzamahmood9565Great powers. Regional powers are only able to influence their immediate surroundings/sphere of influence. Brazil and India would be examples of regional powers.

@dirtysniper3434

6 ай бұрын

Well they are also superpowers same with russia. U.k and France have both been superpowers since the end of ww2. Japan in recent history has become one and would be one if it ever starts a navy again.

@kaifxaif9502

6 ай бұрын

Apart from Russia,the others countries could hardly take any decision of their own.

@mrhonkhonk6116

6 ай бұрын

Iran is regional power saudi arabia is a regional power India is a regional power germany too france is a global power if you can projet your force around the world you fit in the global power

19:24 I caught a little mistake, you said “Informationization” but the word was “Informatization” 😂. Anyway, thanks for being one of the greatest channels to ever exist, sorry KZread has been so hard on you. Love you guys ❤️

@fiaviy.5298

2 ай бұрын

Nope. Informationization is a real word. A dedicated term.

Damn, this is going to be interesting

PLA has already abandoned gorilla warfare tactics by the end of the civil war. PLA fought with the ROC with conventional war tactics. Also fought against the Americans in Korea with conventional war tactics

Props to you and your company for the creatiotof this great ,clear and educative video. I learn a lot of things I didn't know and make things clearer. Thank you and keep the good work. Thanks 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼🇺🇸🇺🇸

@footlessbird1998

6 ай бұрын

Don’t believe the team that made the wrong map of China

You forget to mention that PLA still has political commissars at every level.Which is quite unique consider Soviet Union get rid of theirs and in the end couldn't control their own military.

@baneofbanes

6 ай бұрын

The Soviet Union at no point ever lost control of their military. In fact commissars weakened their military, that’s why they got rid of them.

@user-ri1gp5fp8h

6 ай бұрын

​@@baneofbanesThat's the reform of Galbajos.Lead to the Soviet UnionEven if there is truth, I can't change it.

Right as I’m about to join the corps this is uploaded. Fitting

An excellent and intriguing documentary concerning China's PLA... Definitely, the naval and support capabilities (like Spies, Cyber, and Space) have progressed... With this in mind, also can we safely say China is increasing conventional modernization of its main military branches?... Anyways, do you have any details concerning their Special Forces? Anyhow, a great documentary, thank you, and keep it up.

@ccczzz86

6 ай бұрын

我们中国军队的实力会时刻警告美国军队不要在别人的国家门口为所欲为，中国的军事实力是捍卫自己的和平而美国是为了称霸世界，但是中国可不吃美国这一套。

@NightPhoenix.Y

6 ай бұрын

Search the snow leopards or the snow wolves

9:11 idk but that piece of paper is looking a bit sus

I love this content! Screw KZread for demonetizing you! History should not be censored and people who speak about it should not be punished financially for it! (Here’s a suggestion: Do Poland’s rise in power recently and how it could become Europes next major superpower as well as a dominant global player.) Love from warsaw! ❤️

@OneSingularStair

6 ай бұрын

@ISIPrava711 Not exactly what i mean

@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial

6 ай бұрын

@@OneSingularStair aint no way you're actually Polish

@anrw886

6 ай бұрын

Honestly I can see why. The polish immigrants I've met here in the UK are some of the most hard working people I've met

@outofturn331

6 ай бұрын

Full marks for patriotism, buttttt..

@OneSingularStair

6 ай бұрын

@@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial I’m Polish and Proud!

20:20 🤣🤣🤣 Humble beginnings LmFaOooo

Great video

Pls do one of this for India too.Also pls make a 1971 war video. I would really love to see more India related videos in this channel

@mingmuyiyang8615

6 ай бұрын

I hope Indians can read carefully and experience with their hearts. The huge difference in the founding of China and India determines the biggest difference between India and China. Just look at the modern history of both countries and you will understand. India has been colonized by Britain for more than 200 years. In 1947, Britain experienced World War II, its strength declined significantly, and its status was replaced by the United States. India achieved independence through non violent and non cooperative means. In other words, India's independence has not undergone the test of blood and fire. Such an independent country lacks cohesion, willpower, and a sense of national identity. Now let's talk about China. Since the British defeated the corrupt and incompetent Qing government in 1840, the Chinese people have been living in dire straits. Various disasters and wars followed one after another. At that time, China was very poor and backward, suffering various humiliations. Including the cession of Hong Kong and Macau, Taiwan becoming a Japanese colony, the Eight Nation Alliance setting fire to the Old Summer Palace, and subsequent Japan's comprehensive and brutal invasion of China. In 1931, Japan launched a full-scale invasion of China. From 1931 to 1945, the war lasted for 14 years. The Chinese military and civilians rose up to resist, fought with blood for fourteen years, and suffered 30 million casualties, ultimately achieving victory. Do you know why there are so many casualties in China? There are hundreds of reasons, and I will only give an example of one phenomenon: Chinese troops are in conflict with Japanese troops. Often, if the number of Chinese soldiers participating in the war is 100, they only have 20-30 firearms. The remaining soldiers did not give up resistance or surrender. They bravely fought against the Japanese machine guns and cannons with machetes, steel forks, and wooden sticks until they sacrificed themselves. This spirit of facing death as if returning home and never retreating is the Chinese spirit. 30 million casualties! Do you think this can happen in India? For India, it is zero casualties because their knees are soft. India will soon give up resistance. Do you know why there was the Nanjing Massacre? Due to the desperate resistance of the Chinese military and civilians, they will never surrender or give up. After Japan captured Nanjing, firstly to vent its anger, and secondly to scare off other Chinese soldiers and civilians in resistance. However, the Nanjing Massacre not only did not deter any Chinese people, but also further aroused the resistance of the Chinese people. The establishment of New China has gone through the test of blood and fire. Do you know why the Chinese national flag is red? That's because the establishment of New China was bought with the blood of countless Chinese ancestors, and we Chinese people will always remember it. From 1945 to 1949, during the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang fled to Taiwan. Originally, the Chinese people thought they could live a peaceful life they had longed for, but in 1950, the Korean War broke out, lasting three years. The Chinese People's Volunteer Army successfully resisted the northward route of the United States without air superiority, sea superiority, outdated army equipment, and extremely poor logistics, at the cost of losing hundreds of thousands of brave People's Liberation Army soldiers. As for India's unforgettable and shameful 1962 Sino Indian War, in the eyes of us Chinese, it was not a war at all. Firstly, it only took 32 days. Secondly, from 1959 to 1961, China experienced the most difficult three years since the founding of the People's Republic of China, during which many people starved to death. In 1962, India's economy far surpassed that of China. Both the United States, the Soviet Union, and Britain support India. At that time, India implemented a "forward policy" and attacked China with elite troops. We Chinese people really don't want to go to war. The Chinese troops that participated in the war with India in 1962 were ordinary border defense forces, not regular People's Liberation Army. In China, soldiers are known as the "cutest people". There is a Chinese proverb: without a country, there is no home, and soldiers are the backbone of the country. Thank you to our brave soldiers of the People's Liberation Army who are always ready to defend the borders of our motherland. No matter how India develops its military, it cannot surpass China. Whether in the past, present, or future, China can always defeat India. This is determined by the history and culture of both countries. Chinese people value the spirit of dedication and sacrifice. Do not surrender, do not surrender, vow to resist to the death, and face death as if returning on the battlefield. If Chinese soldiers surrender on the battlefield, it would be a great shame, and the spirit of dying rather than giving up is deeply engraved in the bones of every Chinese person. These are all things that Indians do not possess. So, even now or in the future, India will never be able to defeat China. Now, do you think India can stand tall in the world like China? Absolutely impossible.

No mention of the bombing of Chinese embassy?

I think this is the coolest channel on utube

As an african They are seriously helping my pepole I wont get into much detail but God be with the chinnese pepole

@Elwin123

6 ай бұрын

It's a trap.

@dravenvea2605

6 ай бұрын

you think you are smarter than this african friend?@@Elwin123

@karlk7070

6 ай бұрын

@@Elwin123 Oh no the random loser wanna lecture, what a joke

@footlessbird1998

6 ай бұрын

You haven’t gone through higher education, right?@@karlk7070

@DeniseBaker-bt6di

3 күн бұрын

​@@Elwin123比你们买卖黑人好

KZread will punish the people who do the hard, real work for talking about history or politics to make their advertisers comfortable, yet every ad I see is either a blatant scam or NSFW-themed ad. What a sad state of affairs

About 16 minutes in i noticed Grif snuck in a mysterious stranger themes vault boy, nice reference bro

13:30 it's also worth mentioning while chinese destroyer have less VLS cell but their VLS can launch supersonic anti-ship missile such as YJ-18, in US only Zumwalt class are design to have similar capability

Quick note: PLA's Rocket Force was formerly known as the *Second Artillery Corps* between 1966 to 2016.

@howie6768

5 ай бұрын

Colloquially known as “二炮”。😂

So many many mistake.Chinese volunteers have been described as relying on numerical superiority to defeat powerful enemies, but this is wrong. In fact, looking up the data, we can find that after excluding the Korean army, the war damage of the United Nations is still higher than that of the Chinese volunteers. And, after Dr. Gatlin's gadget, the crowd tactic has been proved to be useless. What is even more terrifying is that in the early stage of annihilating the intrusive regiment of the US military, the Communists were only armed with rifles, explosive cartridges and wooden grenades, and most of the soldiers were not even equipped with cotton-padded clothes (this caused a company of infantry to freeze to death in an ambush position, allowing an American army to escape). Now, OP is almost yelling at you on the loudspeaker, attacking the Communists is no different from eating a plate of French fries.

Can you do Aircraft evolution for nations?

Let’s go, what a topic