No video

Changing the effective stiffness of the walls based on the modulus of rupture in ETABS (Lec14)

Пікірлер: 6

  • @NguyenSon-hx6pj
    @NguyenSon-hx6pj3 жыл бұрын

    really appreciate !

  • @ebilpikkel
    @ebilpikkel2 жыл бұрын

    Is there a difference displaying "visible face" vs "absolute maximum" for shell stresses?

  • @moahmmedahmed3555
    @moahmmedahmed35552 жыл бұрын

    🙏👌😘

  • @aldiputra9236
    @aldiputra92366 ай бұрын

    Why bending m11=0.25 not 0.1 y’a?

  • @Eng.tarekyoussef

    @Eng.tarekyoussef

    5 ай бұрын

    It's important to note that selecting m11 in ETABS involves an assumption about the out-of-plane stiffness of shear walls. While both 0.25 and 0.1 are commonly used values, I personally opt for 0.25, which involves neglecting 75% of the out-of-plane stiffness of shear walls. This decision aligns with recommendations from the ACI 318-14 code, where the inertia of flat plates and flat slabs, primarily resisting gravity loads and thus experiencing out-of-plane bending, is reduced to 0.25 (Table 6.6.3.1.1). Applying the same concept to shear walls, I choose 0.25 for m11. However, it's important to recognize that the choice ultimately depends on project-specific requirements and engineering judgment.

  • @aldiputra9236

    @aldiputra9236

    5 ай бұрын

    @@Eng.tarekyoussef thank you