14:20 labels are the wrong way round, but audio is fine and you can just about see the lightroom camera info

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for noticing and sorry for the mistake! Pinned.

@jeremychurch5683

2 жыл бұрын

I was gonna say the same thing, when I started pixel peeping I thought, something isn’t right here!!! Simple mistake, as always, excellent videos!

@spritual_enlightenment

2 жыл бұрын

That's what I thought too. Glad others notice that, too.

@TheSlageSaga

2 жыл бұрын

I thought I was going crazy for a second.

@derbagger22

2 жыл бұрын

I was looking like, what? The R3 looks so much better. Then I saw the metadata up top. oops...

We appreciate you two greatly! You were the first "training" and "review" channel that I locked in on a few years ago, and I credit you both with a large amount of the photography knowledge that I have!

I just want to say, it may certainly be a lot more work in post but the whole AF test with Chelsea in athletic mode, the color and mono shots and then the graphic on simple to challenging, this should be the benchmark on how to showcase a cameras AF hit rate.

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you! We took and analyzed over 16k photos to come to these conclusions and it’s fun but exhausting haha.

@McFartyPants

2 жыл бұрын

It such a clever thing to do. Props to this channel tbh.

Hey Tony and Chelsea, thanks for putting out such constantly amazing content. I'm always excited to see your new uploads 👍

Some of these critiques seem to miss the mark. For example, Tony makes a conjecture that the loss of detail due to sensor size will increase as ISO increases... lower density sensors often perform better in high ISO/low light situations due to a lower information density and better heat dissipation. The eye control AF is, as far as I know, driven by AI/ML algorithms so continuously recalibrating the same profile will yield better results than having 6 different profiles for 6 different lighting situations. The exception to this is if you're a glasses wearer using several different pairs of glasses. The understanding of how eye control AF is supposed to be used (to set the initial focus lock, not to continuously track on eye location) was lacking. The first item is a function of sensor size, pixel density, and heat dissipation; the other two points are in Canon's documentation (although the calibration profile information is a bit muddled). Also, did you alter the "stickiness" portion of the AF settings when doing the "two athlete" test? I believe Canon's default mode is such that it picks up on and prioritizes new figures entering the AF zone, so much of the focus switching there could actually have been the camera working as intended (my R3, set to the stickiest mode, seems to perform a lot better though I haven't done that type of test in the same deliberate manner) As an R3 shooter, I do have to say there are pluses and minuses to both the sensor size and the eye control... but the specific criticisms you've framed up here seem a bit like misinterpretations of intended functionality.

@doghouseriley4732

2 жыл бұрын

You need to read between the lines. The Canon money truck hasn't pulled up the drive recently so........................................ Why these 2 cameras are reviewed against each other. Only they know. They are not very similar and are targeted at different sectors. The R3 is not a wildlife camera at all. In most respects it is a sloppy review of tow cameras that should never be compared.

Another great video guys but one thing I noticed with "eye control focusing" on my old eos 30v film camera was if I used a large Hoodman eyecup the system was more accurate as it held my eye in a fixed position and it would be worthwhile to see if this improves the accuracy with the R3. Canon makes a large optional eyecup for the R3 too : the Canon ER-hE Eyecup. I suspect this would make a big difference as the eye detection system is obviously going to be less accurate if you move your head even slightly

Just so good! All the work you put in to it! Thank you!

Hey Tony and Chelsea thanks for all the good work

The effort and energy that go into these videos are always A1! Absolutely love watching everything you all upload!

@trippalhealicks

2 жыл бұрын

I see what you did there. lol

@TheCliffHanger

2 жыл бұрын

@@trippalhealicks lol I didn’t want to be too corny but I could not not do it

I need some sort of Eye Focusing for this video. My focus keeps flipping between the extremely high production quality, the quality of the information delivered, the extreme athleticism, and the extreme dryness of the humor. This is good science and very very good art. A joy!

I miss your old videos on how to actually take great photos. All you guys do now is review the latest cameras which we don't need. You don't need to upgrade your camera and switch brands every 4 months.

I didn't think one day I would say the Canon R5 is so cheap at $3900! Merry Christmas Tony & Chelsea :-)

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

Haha yeah camera prices are out of control!!

I purchased a Canon EOS 5 when first released in 1992 and used it alongside my EOS 10. The EOS 5 actually had an eye control focus system and it worked really well for me. Obviously more basic than the system in the R3, but it only required initial calibration.

you don't need to move the camera to switch from eye to eye. you just tap the joystick toward the eye that you want. so if you're looking at the right eye and you want to go to the other eye, you just tap toward the other eye. if you have multiple people lined together, each tap of the joystick will switch from eye to eye to eye between all the people.

In the side by side bird comparison shots - I was confused and had to roll back...you have it labeled backwards (metadata to video typed overlay is incorrect).

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

Yes sorry about that

This one of your most fun videos to watch! And thanks for the great review

Thank you Tony & Chelsea for another interesting review! The eye controlled focus is not a new concept for Canon. They had this feature way back in the early days of the AF film cameras, though I'm sure not anywhere near as advanced. As others have mentioned, the R3 seems to be a camera for for pro sports photographers. I'm not a pro photographer, but personally have had no desire for a battery grip (or built in grip) since way back in the days when I still used my Minolta Maxxum 7 and Maxxum 9. Just too big and heavy. Battery technology is so much better today than even a few years ago. Its more practical to just care a spare battery or two. If I were a Canon user I would chose the R5, or for someone new trying to decide on a system. But I shoot Sony and am too invested in the great selection of lenses. It would seem to me, a new user should not overlook the variety of lenses available for E mount, not just from Sony, but from all the 3rd party manufacturers.. Of course there are so many makers of fine cameras out there and in the end, it's the photographer that makes great photography. But the technology in these new cameras is so fascinating and is improving in leaps and bounds.

Thanks for the great comparison! I own both including the 50mm lens. I did notice Sonys 50mm F1.2 AF were a whole lot quicker than the Canon's 50mm F1.2 and its probably how they move the assembly. My guess is that's one of the reason of the fall off in closer ranges for canon system. Probably need a test using 24-70 or 70-200 to investigate further.

@onlysublime

2 жыл бұрын

i don't think it's a realistic test. athletes are not 2 feet in front of your face. jared polin did a realistic test by photographing soccer, football, and basketball. i guess if the goal is to film fast moving objects 2 feet in front of your face, then the R3 isn't meant for you.

@AlbertKel

2 жыл бұрын

Another bullshit test from the Northrups.. the Sony 50 mm focuses a lot a faster then the Canon lens. So they tested the lens not the cameras. Bring out the glass made for action testing this camera. You guys are getting more and more unpopular not because you tell the truth but because you apparently deliberately design biased test…

Hello and Merry Christmas from Australia I’ve been following your channel for awhile but because of your recommendations I’ve just placed my first order on Christmas Eve from KEH for some used Canon L-series lenses and I’m quite excited. Thank you and keep up the awesome work you both do

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

Merry Christmas and enjoy the new lenses!

Happy Holidays, Merry Christmas

Converting to monochrome was a really cool way to show the out of focus images. Thanks for this video comparison!

Would love to see how the Nikon Z9 autofocus stacks up against the R3 and others? Maybe when you get your hands on it? Thanks for the video. 🙂🙂

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

Yes me too!

15:20 Shout out to the A1 for capturing every frame of the bird poop!

I love Chelsea's face telling Tony to keep his voice down when he was saying how expensive their kit was!

Really good, objective review. Switching to black and white when focused strayed was a really smart way to show that.

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks I wish I had thought of that years ago. I guess it wasn’t that important when we were shooting 5 FPS but when you’re shooting 30fps videos we need some way to illustrate it in real time.

I love how you showed OOF shots in b/w! Great idea! The tests were fun to watch, too XD

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks, miss you, Erland! Chelsea got the girls some Norwegian stocking stuffers in memory of our trip. Merry Christmas!

@smaakjeks

2 жыл бұрын

@@TonyAndChelsea Aw, that's lovely

is the bird eye af better on the r5 than the r3? these tests don't look promising for the r3. did you adjust the focus responsiveness settings to make it more responsive for fast, close subjects?

Thanks for the review, love yall

Great review guys!

Amazing review!!

Nice review.. love the B&W usage for out of focus samples.. however, wondering why shoot or test action shots with a 50 f1.2 lens in the first half with the R3.. a 28-70 f2 or a 24-70 would’ve been better I think..

Thank U. They were nice comparisons.

The R3 has a much better colour accuracy if you heavily recover shadows and in high ISO. The A1 and the R5 show some magenta or green tint in those situations.

I did not only learn and watch camera reviews on this channel...I also learn love... this couples are amazing 🤗🤗🥰🥰🥰🤗🤗

Hello, in the wildlife section (picture comparison) the Canon/Sony are switch around. Merry Christmas

Thanks for the autofocus review. One thing I think would be very helpful is to state the version of firmware each camera is using. This has become very important information as each manufacturer seems to be adding features and refining functionality like autofocus. For example, the Canon R5 firmware v1.5 makes some significant improvements to the autofocus. Anyway, like I said it would be helpful, I think, especially down the road when the video has been out for a while as well since the firmware is unlikely to remain static for any of these cameras.

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

We updated all of them prior to recording this. The a1 FW was released the day before and maybe I’m imagining it but it seemed to improve bird acquisition.

An excellent test suite and data presentation. Us spreadsheet lovers got what we needed, and the colour/BW part was a nice innovation

If you turn the joystick on in the menu system on the R5/R3, you can go left and right with the joystick to change which eye you're focusing on with the eye detect.

@nordic5490

2 жыл бұрын

On my r5, I can steer the focus point on the screen with my thumb. Or, just recentre on the eye of choice

What gimbals are giving you those smooth pans with the big lenses?

Great comparison, I’m shooting the R3 right now I am a winter sports photographer, Ive on;y done one event so far and it worked quite well, I will never use the eye control system, yet like a lot of people i wish it had the 45MP sensor if for anything cropping.. Another observation id R4 is still on V1 of firmware I am sure Canon will be fixing and updating features were it will only get better.

@angryrabbitproductions1690

2 жыл бұрын

I also am shooting the R3, and have no doubt the AF will be refined in the upcoming releases. Such is the drawback of being an early adopter.

I just wanna spy on my neighbors.

@bigglizzy8471

2 жыл бұрын

Bro what 💀

Very detailed video, thanks for that :) I own both the R5 and R3... and coming from the excellent R5 autofocus I expected the R3 to be better. I mean, it has way less MP so it's clearly geared more towards capturing sports and fast action. However, the autofocus on the R3 is killing the whole experience. I get constant drifting from the autofocus lock. It would lock on a subject, then transfer to some mode where a lot of blue autofocus points appear and then it just drifts off. It happens constantly and makes me take the R5 on jobs now: I bought a second R5 and leave the R3 in the storage. Has anyone found a solution to this? I tried every menu option there is, but none can disable the automatic switching of the AF mode. My guess is, that you need more MP to build a reliable AF system: the sensor just doesn't see enough detail to have proper AF.

@BEC7OR

3 ай бұрын

I have the same problem. Tried all the cases. Its really sad when you spend a hefty amount of money. Thinking about switching to the Sony A1 right now since that seems more sticky and doesnt ”panic” as the Canon r3

What are your thoughts on the next a1? It’s pretty much reached the tops.

I really like this channel and have learned sooooo much from Tony & Chelsea! I'm a very green beginner with a digital camera but have reached a point in my life where I now have a bit more time to figure some of this stuff out so when it comes time for my next camera I will have enough knowledge to know what camera will be the best for my future needs. I bought a very basic entry level Panasonic Lumix G85 with just the stock lens 12-60mm Power O. I. S. Lens and felt it was a good place to start with the tiny budget and short list of needs at the time. It has served me well and I'm still not ready to move up to another camera just yet because it still does everything I need it to do and the 4k video was and still is important to me. I have come to really like this little camera even with it's limitations. Ok...so my question is this. I would like to buy wide angle lens without breaking the bank {new or used} and would prefer to find a wide angle with the built in image stabilization to work together with the camera. Not a deal breaker without the built in stabilization but certainly preferred. I knew all these cameras and accessories where expensive but gosh it's just sooooo much money every time I look for this or that. Sorry....don't mean to complain because I realize that's just the way it is so I will just have to deal with it. Anyway...I'm looking for wide angle lens options if anyone is willing to help with some suggestions that would be greatly appreciated. I would like to get as wide angle as possible without the fisheye effect. Oh...and being Canadian means an added burden of exchange rates since most of the best deals are in USD and with our "northern peso" it certainly does not make things any easier...hahaha. Thanks for your time! Tyler

Hi Tony and Chelsea, have you actually reviewed the Nikon Z9 yet, I see you mentioned in your description to subscribe for our review of the Z9 ?! I cannot find it on your KZread site however, is it only available with a subscription ?

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

No we don’t have our copy yet. Hopefully it’ll ship soon.

Cool, way beyond my budget and needs but good to see how this stuff stacks up

sONY HAS this archille heel. in PERCHED shots, the second time you touch the Already sharply focused , it goes and hunt from Far to subject. BUT its already pre focused. Why does it hunt ? Happens too many times to be user / situation specific.

Thanks you two!!

You claimed the R5 AF to be superior to the A1 a few years ago If i recall, correct?

What tripods and heads were used when shooting birds?

Y’all are pumping out these videos. Loving it thank you, and Merry Christmas.

Probably your best review by far. Cannot understate how much we appreciate the effort you put in.

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@E4xtream

2 жыл бұрын

@@TonyAndChelsea Merry Christmas.

@sosomelodies659

2 жыл бұрын

Agree. No one has done this kind of test. Very interesting results. Good work from those two.

Could it be that while shooting birds, the adapted ef lens made the difference in focusing? Could it be better with the native rf 600 mm lens? Also, the rf 50 mm 1.2 is slower focusing than the sony 50 1.2 if I am not wrong. Can it be the lenses and not the camera that struggled focusing? What's your thoughts?

@TechnoBabble

2 жыл бұрын

I definitely think the differences in focusing come down to the lens you're using, both companies have lenses that focus faster than competitors equivalents and allow for better sharp fps in different scenarios.

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

The 600 f4 is RF. And yes the lenses can impact focusing performance, but it’s realistic, because that’s the lens you’re going to use if you’re shooting court-side sports. We’ll use the 70-200s when we do the Z9 review.

@parthibchakrabortyreevu247

2 жыл бұрын

Sorry. I took the teleconverter for an adapter. That's my bad. And I agree that the system overall is what will determine the buyers. But there are some equivalent sony lenses that focus worse. So it could be the other way around with some other lenses for sports or something else. But the sony A1 with the 600 f4 is definitely much better.

Hi,did you do tests without the 2x extender as well? See that in all of the clips where you say autofucus struggled was with the 2x at 1200mm. So is the sony better with extenders or is it just that the a1 focus is better overall, with or without extenders? How do you compare r3 focus to r5, better or worse with our without potential extenders? Best regards Jonathan

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, with and without. They both seemed similar; you don’t really feel the effect in AF.

Happy Christmas and a wonderful new year. Quick question on R3 @ 30fps, were you shooting to both cards, or is the buffer free speed only to CFE. Seems like the Sony with its huge 50mp files needs CFE, while the R3 could get away with sd, any thoughts? Looking forward to your next high end review with the z9, now that they are shipping. I suspect with its weaker price position compared to R3 and A1, it will come in closer to the R5 overall, so i hope you include that body in the test. Hoping it does not have severe limitation on 8k video, and poor af tracking. I wonder if the olpf will make it's real resolution closer to R3 vs the R5. Your unbiased review should help dispel all the hype, and bring people back to ground. Nikon was playing catch-up to the R5, although even the R3 seems to underperform the R5 In some aspects, except for thier amazing 30fps raw which is market leading if at 24mp. Sony still seems to have the edge on Nikon and Canon, when it comes to af and overall consistency. The eye tracking is a bit disappointing in your review Thanks again. This really helps people decide

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

We shot just to the fast card for the buffer test. SD card definitely jams up the R3; I write JPGs to it just as a backup to the raws.

@barryobrien1890

2 жыл бұрын

@@TonyAndChelsea thanks. Hopefully they will put a faster card in the next model, as JPEGs are not as good a backup

On the r5, with a single NH battery, I can easily get 2000+ shots with the camera in H+ green, for BIF applications. And that is for the mechanical shutter, too.

@drbeardo6960

2 жыл бұрын

Cool

How safe Is for your retina?

You guys are hilarious haha 💚 Great comparison! Didn't know you never accepted free gear from camera companies! That's honestly amazing and a breath of fresh air. The other KZread channels are exhausting with their biased gear marketing videos

You could get and R6 and an R5 for about the same price. While they don’t have some of the newer features of the R3, I would think it would be better to have a backup camera. Unless you really need video that doesn’t overheat and can shoot over that 30 minute record limit.

What about wildlife, birds between A1 and R5... I didn't see that... As I've heard that the auto focus of R5 outperforms the A1. What say?

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

We did a separate video comparing those two cameras, though the a1 has a new firmware update since.

Thanks for being independent all these years, and hopefully for many more years to come :)

The side by side shots at 14:16 is actually labeled wrong at the bottom of screen.

Any chance you could use a Ninja Atomos or equivalent to record the screen while using the eye tracking feature? Talking through it is fine and all but would have been helpful to see what you are seeing as well!

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

The viewfinder shuts off when you attach an HDMI recorder.

I like these content. I don't want to tell you what you should do with your channel, but gear review, comparisons and tutorials are my favourite.

Great job! To bad the Z9 didn't come out a bit earlier, it would have been awesome to compare that as well.

Hi Tony and Chelsea, Thank you for the review, question: do you any time felt that electronic view finder could or might cause issue to the human eye when you perform real time shooting might be 1-3 hours?

@nexusparadigm4062

2 жыл бұрын

Eye control was introduced in EOS 5 ANALOG in 1994. Since then noone complained publicly about any eye pain.

@jvusa

2 жыл бұрын

@@nexusparadigm4062 Not Eye control, Electronic view finder?

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

Sorry I have no idea

@nexusparadigm4062

2 жыл бұрын

@@jvusa Sorry

@jeffreyhill4705

2 жыл бұрын

I have tried all the Canon EVFs without issue, However a more accomplished local photographer I know tried a few EVFs, and could not stand any of them. This was right before the R5 was released. I highly recommend you rent a few models over a Few different weekends to see how the different EVFs effect you. In the Canon line there is considerable differences in resolution, lag, and refresh rate.

Thank you for your video! We recently purchased a Canon R5. We love everything about it except when it locks up. We updated firmware to 1.5.1, but it made no difference. We are considering exchanging the R5 for a Nikon Z9. What would be your recommendation? The Sony A1 is too small (and uncomfortable) in my hands. Thank you!

@doghouseriley4732

2 жыл бұрын

You could simply use the warantee, that's what it's for

So ur also saying the canon r6 is just as good for half the price ? @tomy&chelsea

Thanks for another great video. There is only one reason I would change to mirrorless, and that is the silent shutter. Not even sure I want 30 FPS but with a silent shutter I guess that may give me more choice. But in my experience when the silent shutter would be an advantage, is with the animal still, then you don't need 30 frames? If the animal is moving then there is little advantage with the silent shutter and for me 10 frames are enough. It all seems a little like the motorcycle market where we now have super lite bikes with 200 bhp and all the tech to enable ordinary folk to ride it. Yet the average rider uses no more than 45 bhp while riding. Happy Christmas and new year to you both.

This. Thank you!

13:10 Chelsea you are in a cluster af mode on the r3 not tracking so anything outside of that it won't pick up. Surely user error there or better yet should have left it to the subject detect with tracking like on the alpha 1.

@cooloox

2 жыл бұрын

Do you know what annoys me? People testing cameras and doing it incorrectly. Left to find the bird/animal automatically using all AF points, Canon cameras find the subject far quicker than trying to put a silly box over the subject. Even my RP grabs a bird far faster than I can place a box over it and the RP doesn't even have bird detection.

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

That was just sample footage shot on a different day but we tried every different AF mode and had the best success with that. Using wider AF settings caused it to CONSTANTLY lock onto the background.

@jameswilliamson7432

2 жыл бұрын

Most Canon shooters are going to use Face AF + Tracking for birds in flight.

@angryrabbitproductions1690

2 жыл бұрын

I think I’ll try to shoot some bird pictures with my R3. I’m really curious if I get the same dismal performance. I knew Canon had this camera in wildlife photographer’s hands during development, so I’d be surprised if the results fall short of the older R5.

@camerasutra247

2 жыл бұрын

@@angryrabbitproductions1690 lol I bet you wont

Curious to know if Canon developed this technology for the militaries heads up display multi target acquisition system.

@barryobrien1890

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe for the Japanese military

Good review. Thought the high speed focus test of moving subjects just a few feet from the camera was a bit comical.

Thank you for the very informative video. Please consider testing the R3's rolling shutter performance when shooting stills of extremely fast moving subjects, specifically, the propeller blades on airplanes. My DSLRs (i.e., Canon 1DXM2 and 7DM2) do a great job. Before spending $6k on the R3, I'd like to confirm that it does not distort moving propeller blades.

Interesting comment from Chelsea "considering a Canon competitor product" over her current R5, which one? I am still considering the switch to mirrorless so love these comparison videos. Thanks and keep up the good work

Got my R3 right after thanksgiving and have been using eye control AF almost exclusively. yes - you must recalibrate in different lighting and there’s also probably physiological variability based on our own fatigue/dilation, etc. I also have experienced the eye control point drifting, but then I figured out that the eye control AF is really dependent on the shooter maintaining the positioning of the eye to the eyecup horizontally and vertically, and keeping the distance constant. I think that they can improve the eye control AF in firmware, and maybe build in an ongoing self-calibration routine where you can look to the center or a designated point and hit a button so you can bypass the normal calibration routine. I’ve adapted to the quirkiness and have trained how I use my eye and the shutter/back button focus to be able to use eye control reliably and almost exclusively. I use this frequently in dance and theater performances where I can use my eye to selectively focus and shoot individuals within a curtain call lineup, which would be harder using touch screen or joystick

@noelchignell1048

2 жыл бұрын

You should buy an Canon ER-hE Eyecup which is a large rotating one which holds your face/eye socket in a consistent position , I have an old eos 30v film camera with their original "eye controlled focus" system and I found using a large Hoodman eyecup held my eye socket in a consistent position which greatly improved accuracy so I suspect this would help on the R3 too

@mxilplict

2 жыл бұрын

@@noelchignell1048 Thanks - I will look into this

Nice content 👍❤

Less than two years ago I went all in with Canon. I bought the R5C and other RF L series 2.8 glass. 2 months ago I bought the RF 600mm F4, so I am really locked in now. But now that I have been shooting with Canon for while the clear choice was always the Sony A1. I even remember this video when I was shopping around for a camera. ....should have listened :) Luckily the 600 F4 holds value if I decide to switch over. The Canon R1 expectations have drastically been reduced (based on Canon Rumors) If the rumors turn out to be true it will make the Sony A1 an even better option in terms of specs and value. I am starting to loose patience with Canon as you can tell but I will at least wait until the announcement.

best autofocus is what I'm looking for. Low light also comes in handy.

14:16 to 14.39.. Is it the real caption?

This is great!!

How useful is the eye detection focusing system for people who wear eyeglasses?

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

It works! But the corners of the viewfinder get hidden.

is that the rf 600mm

I wonder if the increased resolution helps the A1 finding far away subjects faster.

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

Hmm interesting idea

What about dynamic range...?

Great video, lots of good information, and just the right amount of humor here and there. Also, I like that you pointed out how the R6 might be a great option for only $2500. Happy Holidays!

Amazing review :) I found your burst speed tests more credible than usual :) Can you test the dynamic range of the R3 ? And do a controlled sharpness comparison with the A9 and the R1 ? Thanks :)

@TonyAndChelsea

2 жыл бұрын

Will do!

Great review! I've never considered Sony til now. However, the bird shots left me scratching my head. I had to rewatch and look down to make sure the labels were correct on comparison shots. The Sony was clearly NOT sharper in your test pics. The one bird's legs were significantly more detailed with the Canon. Was this a mistake ?

No nonsense non biased review. It's refreshing to see. Stay Safe. Ian (UK)

Great comparison test. This is how the camera should be tested. not just base on spec. and shooting a subject on the table. BTW. you lable wrong at 14.00 about the resolution comparison. happy holiday to you both. cheers.

Excellent entertaining comparision...

14:33 you got the picture discription or the pictures messed up^^ rest done great

Turn off eye af so that head face det is on ?

YAY Frank making a cameo!! 🎉🎉

Chelse for it to work as it should don't leave a gap between the eye cup and your eye .no wonder you are not getting the sharp fucus on your frames.commsn sense comes into question m

Canon R3 vs Nikon Z9?

This was a great hands-on review, the R3 is a great camera for professional sports photographers. The only drawback for me is the resolution - today I expect at least Sony AIV resolution in this price range. The target group are Canon users, as a newcomer I would not buy the camera - also because of the very expensive RF lenses. The concept of the large housing with integrated battery grip is aimed at professionals - personally, I prefer more compact housings - here the A1 - except for the price - goes the right way.

@angryrabbitproductions1690

2 жыл бұрын

I’ve owned this cameras for about a month. Having formerly owned the Canon 1DXMK2 for 3 years, I immediately noticed that the size/weight of the R3 felt substantially less than the DSLR. It’s a modern interpretation of the type imo. And Canon did a really good job. It fits perfectly in the hand, while not feeling burdensome.

good ..

14:20 labels are messed up

Thank you for that review! That was awesome. Seems the Canon EOS R5 is stil the way to go, if you are not sports photographer. (And if you are Canon photographer.)