Doing the math to prove it’s a 90 degree V8 when pictures already exist is peak Jason

@PKConnolly1

2 ай бұрын

Bro doesn’t need eyes to see the world, just numbers

@CyanRooper

2 ай бұрын

"THE NUMBERS M̶A̶S̶O̶N̶ JASON!!! WHAT DO THEY MEAN?"

@AM-uk7jv

2 ай бұрын

A necessary precaution to silence the loud ignorant trolls who live by the Dunning Kruger Effect.

@AadidevSooknananNXS

2 ай бұрын

I laughed@@CyanRooper

@rondavis2791

2 ай бұрын

Dudes like neo see's every thing in code

“The turbos are 69% larger…nice” 😂

@roteroktober360

2 ай бұрын

Totally caught me off guard 😂😂

@jeffb7788

2 ай бұрын

snuck it in there 😂 guy’s a legend

@Xeonerable

2 ай бұрын

I just love how saying "...nice" whenever the number 69 comes up has become such a widespread thing, it's hilarious.

@TheFunLuvnCRIMINAL

2 ай бұрын

Nice.

@MJ-rr4hd

2 ай бұрын

thats a very good number 😂

2:25 "69% larger, nice" Not even a smirk. Amazing.

@Rgdarkchild

Ай бұрын

Nice

@nicmainville9954

Ай бұрын

He's not a man of culture, he's a gentleman of culture.

@Maxst33le

Ай бұрын

Nice

@SCARFACE69247

Ай бұрын

Nice

@OfficialCDTPlayer

Ай бұрын

Nice

Accidentally synchronized our “nice” out of instincts. I’m dying 😂💀 @2:26

@OdyTypeR

Ай бұрын

I was like "jinx". 😁 I think we _all_ said it out loud at the same time 😂. His timing was perfect. And the nonchalant delivery was 🤌.

Bugatti took the creation of the Koenigsegg Gemera personally 💀

@Shadsuna

2 ай бұрын

This doesn't aim to be a practical hypercar that can be used as a daily driver just as easily as a raceway rocket, though...

@alexluke84

2 ай бұрын

Not the same buyers target

@gottliebdee263

2 ай бұрын

@@alexluke84 Not the point. They did not want to be outdone at any cost.

@IAG369

2 ай бұрын

Only thing left is to make a 4 seat vehicle..

@alexluke84

2 ай бұрын

​@@IAG369still the fastest car with more than 2people is McLaren Speedtail...delivered to all few years ago...Gemera is far from production...and Bugatti doesnt bother with 4seaters

Company : "We're not currently releasing the official specs to the public" Jason, equipped with a promo image and a whiteboard : "You absolute fools"

@EngineeringExplained

2 ай бұрын

😂😂

@kaiwalpanchal5872

2 ай бұрын

can't beat physics lol

@v4skunk739

2 ай бұрын

8.3 V16 built by Cosworth.

@ghoulbuster1

2 ай бұрын

He is ALWAYS two steps ahead

@456MrPeople

2 ай бұрын

To be fair, the insider information given by the customers was also helpful.

I own a BMW i5 M60 and the 600 hp is more than I have ever experienced. A Bugatti with 1000hp aspirated PLUS 1000hp electric will be unimaginable.

@AndyPat239

Ай бұрын

exactly

@pmudri

Ай бұрын

unimaginable? there are 2000hp cars already.

@thenamelessking7873

Ай бұрын

​@pmudri no there's 2000hp machines not cars. This car has AC name another 2000hp car with AC

@TheEchelon

Ай бұрын

@@pmudri That's not what he meant. The experience is unimaginable for someone who has never driven a car that powerful.

@1harrismccarty

Ай бұрын

@@pmudri I don’t think there are any 2000hp cars that have half of that power available instantaneously. I suppose any car with that much power is going to be acceleration limited by available traction tho.

Bro, gotta say, the neatness, precision, layout and use of colour on your whiteboard display is as impressive as your engineering knowledge

I’m glad they numbered the cylinders so it will be super easy for my local mechanic to work on

@stuffhappens5681

2 ай бұрын

This is not soup for you!

@rudolfvanderven

Ай бұрын

Hell, might as well work on it yourself at this point really

@loganstuckey730

Ай бұрын

Laughed out loud when I read this 😂

@benjackson6260

Ай бұрын

Just imagine if it got combined with the Light Speed Transmission from Koenigsegg... If u wanna compare any transmission sounds, then I would say none can beat that one... So in my opinion the light speed transmission could be paired well with the massive thrust produced by the Bugatti V16... That's if these 2 can put their rivalries aside😅😂

@wafiqM

Ай бұрын

You sure you can afford it bud?

2:21 - that "nice" was so casual, yet so effective, i love it

@corpsie-diytools38

2 ай бұрын

Let's get this on a tray

@benjadonnelly2384

2 ай бұрын

I’m glad I wasn’t the only one who noticed

Just saw your video from 11 years ago explaining the hemi. Read the comments where you were talking about being an engineer and i decided to check to see if youre still making videos, and you are! Glad you stuck with it!

@EngineeringExplained

Ай бұрын

Ha - things worked out okay! Appreciate the kind words! :)

@aarondavies8486

Ай бұрын

​@EngineeringExplained didn't rolls make this v16 engine back in the early 2000s they put it in a rolls in a film rowin Atkinson where he played a spy

You have no idea how happy I am. Bugatti are singlehandedly keeping engineering marvels alive.

@pietskiet42-_

Ай бұрын

You have never heard of Koenigsegg? 😅😅😅

@vitamc1213

Ай бұрын

@@pietskiet42-_ Yeah, building 3-cylinder cars... 🥱

@spencera2204

Ай бұрын

Koenigsegg is

@theMelvinShow

Ай бұрын

There are a lot of companies „keeping engineering marvels alive”. Everyone is just doing that in their own field. Maybe you are biased against that and are therefore not recgnizing it.

@adrianbyron-parker5797

Ай бұрын

Or Cosworth @@pietskiet42-_

Now we need a W 24 engine. Just 8 more.

@interstate80.

2 ай бұрын

OOOOOO OOOOOO -/_/-/_/-/_/- OOOOOO OOOOOO

@RedfishCarolina

2 ай бұрын

It'd be a lot easier to just buy two of these V16s and put them together. Play your cards right and you could make it a W32

@itsdokko2990

2 ай бұрын

at that point, we should use 2 engines only to power a generator, just like with the Belaz 75710

@Appletank8

2 ай бұрын

or rotate 3 of them to get a Radial-48

@erkinalp

2 ай бұрын

why not a 2 stroke opposed piston inline 12?

It looks sooooo good. And sounds too😍

@_IMNNO

2 ай бұрын

Did Mate give any sneak peeks off camera?

@TheFuxxoWorksGarage

2 ай бұрын

will you be driving one on the ring soon? 😲

@Proparkourgamer

2 ай бұрын

tell Rimac to let you drive one in the green hell

@shameernazar4466

Ай бұрын

Waiting for your ring lap ❤

@benjackson6260

Ай бұрын

Just imagine if it got combined with the Light Speed Transmission from Koenigsegg... If u wanna compare any transmission sounds, then I would say none can beat that one... So in my opinion the light speed transmission could be paired well with the massive thrust produced by the Bugatti V16... That's if these 2 can put their rivalries aside😅😂

Love your videos Jason! A while ago you inspired me to get more into engineering and for that I am very grateful. Another excellent video

Jason, thank you very much for taking the time to explain this. It is very interesting. Your explanations of the firing order of the cylinders & how they balance each other reminded me of counterpoint in the music of JS Bach. Thank You.

“Was all this a waste…. Maybe.”😂😂😂 this guy is brilliant and subtlety hilarious. Awesome job.

V16 in this day and age? I see the VW Group is being adventurous.

@dennisallen8333

2 ай бұрын

Yippie! I’m tired of some of these boring cars!

@Dqtube

2 ай бұрын

It can be tough when you're still living in an era where Bugatti owns VW Group. Try to update your dataset.

@johnburns4017

2 ай бұрын

@@Dqtube You need to read and _understand_ what I wrote.

@crackedemerald4930

2 ай бұрын

​@@Dqtubei thought VW owned Bugatti, and not the other way around

@ihavealife002

2 ай бұрын

@@crackedemerald4930 VW group owned Bugatti, but they sold it to Rimac. There isn't a car company on this planet that could buy VW group.

Excellent video Jason. Was feeling underwhelmed waking up today, but this made my day, great content, perfectly presented.

That smirk after "Maybe." was just saying "because I can". 😁🤟

How much more cylinders do you want? Bugatti: Yes. 😂

@notsafefortorque9060

2 ай бұрын

its the same tho. 16. Just in a V config.

@CyanRooper

2 ай бұрын

During the early days of the Veyron's development they considered using an 18 cylinder engine before deciding "nah, that's too much" and so they decided on a far more sensible 16 cylinder engine instead.

@jwalster9412

2 ай бұрын

​@@notsafefortorque9060 Classic VW over complicating a 16 cylinder.

@jwalster9412

2 ай бұрын

​@@CyanRooper10 is the limit. Anything above that is over complicating.

@Nordlicht05

2 ай бұрын

17 please

I had no idea 2 came after 1. I think that's an underrated discovery from this video, thank you! Putting your degree to WORK

@snowgorilla9789

2 ай бұрын

Carefull you'll get called racist

@jokwonpope1561

2 ай бұрын

@@snowgorilla9789mathist

@alexrosario7661

2 ай бұрын

U think ur better than us cuz ur white ?

@erik9108

Ай бұрын

I got a laugh out of that line too!

"Why go with this V16 Hybrid strategy?" Because it's badass?

Beautiful engineering its not until i watched this video that i truly got to understand the complexity of these engines

It's not so much that the downsides don't matter, it's that they aren't even downsides. This is a vehicle for which being excessively expensive to buy, expensive to maintain, expensive to drive, and insanely complicated is an advantage. It will make the vehicle more desirable. It is an exceptionally large peacock tail, in vehicle form.

@EngineeringExplained

2 ай бұрын

Yep, exactly.

@inevespace

2 ай бұрын

If I buy a rusted car with a dying engine for huge money and repair holes on chassis one by one when a place cracked. And repair engine only cylinder by cylinder so that it become expensive to maintain. Does it becomes a peacock tail?

@cademckee7276

2 ай бұрын

@@inevespaceDoes it have a Bugatti badge and cost over a million to buy?

@mullayho1759

2 ай бұрын

​@@inevespace Vintage cars are like that and some go for huge amounts of money

@jppagetoo

Ай бұрын

It was nearly impossible to get insurance to drive the Veyron or Konegg. Nobody will insure this for the road. Amazing engineering, complete showoff design, and useless for anything but "drive it" date on a closed track. Drive it a few laps then it's back to the shop for $100K in maintenance and new tires.

The instant torque of electric and that gorgeous sound of that v16. Pretty hyped to see what this car will look like!

@joe13c00l2

2 ай бұрын

@AudreyH48 maybe a road-legal Bolide complying with emissions and stuff?

@XXXPUBLICENEMY

2 ай бұрын

It will be lenght of the Titanic probably

@isaac4273

2 ай бұрын

​@@XXXPUBLICENEMY sounds great to me, give me the land yacht

@lerr001jr7

2 ай бұрын

So short, this thing is gonna be a beast

@Harrappa

2 ай бұрын

@@XXXPUBLICENEMYI don’t think so it will be similar in length to chirons . Considering the teaser of car under cover which bugatti gave.

wow this was so much fun to watch! thanks for the awesome video

At approx 10 minutes in I experienced a subtle transition from incomprehensible to hypnotic. Couldn’t stop watching - love your videos Jason.

Him: "The turbo chargers were 69% larger." Me: Nice Him: Nice Me 😄

@v4skunk739

2 ай бұрын

No idea why you are talking about turbos. The Cosworth V16 is naturally aspirated.

@shiftyhexahedron7891

2 ай бұрын

Also Me: Nice

@itsdokko2990

2 ай бұрын

@@v4skunk739 jason was comparing the W16 engines from the Veyron/Chiron

@laurencemoore2105

2 ай бұрын

I see what they did there, they wanted not just forced induction, but rizz induction too....

@colinvanful

2 ай бұрын

twin oversized turboes are actualy quad turboes . i think imhop if you want the best output just use a good old fashoned charger

Cizeta Moroder V16T had a V16 in the 1990s. Depends if you consider 13 units "production". It was 4 banks of 4, so 32 valve, octo-cam engine. Claudio Zampolli was nuts.

@CyanRooper

2 ай бұрын

Rare cars are still considered production vehicles even when they are made in single digit numbers.

@electrikoptik

2 ай бұрын

I used to own a Cizeta Moroder V16T In Gran Turismo 4

@tomkandy

2 ай бұрын

It's contentious whether that's even a proper V16 - had two cranks, four cams, and central power shaft. It's more like 2 V8s in one block.

@PrinceAlhorian

2 ай бұрын

​@@tomkandyso they were bonkers enough to fit two engines in one car... Legendary!

@ThaDutchDK1989

2 ай бұрын

It where 2 Lamborghini 4.0 V8 uraco engines and mated together the gearbox was in the middle ..

The crank and camshaft harmonics would be an interesting thing to see as well. An engine that long is sure to pose some challenges with torsional vibration and I'd love to see what they did. Also, exhaust manifold pics please. Eliminating blowdown interference and meeting emissions don't typically happen at the same time on crossplane V8s, so it will be cool to see how they did it (I mean, they could use 8 cat converters on cylinder pairs with a 270 degree firing separation, but that would be the easy way).

Not a waste of time at all Jason ! Actually super entertaining and very informative!! Loved it!!👍👌

I wonder if that would fit in my Fiat 500?

@digitalzomb

2 ай бұрын

If your mounts start at the dash maybe

@feedbackzaloop

2 ай бұрын

VAG parts in Stellantis???

@R03333

2 ай бұрын

​@@feedbackzaloopeuro beat gives access to powers unknown

@foxmnguni3496

2 ай бұрын

It will as long as u gon drive it from the outside😂

@EngineeringExplained

2 ай бұрын

There's always a chance!

No way are Cosworth making another insane engine... GOATs

@abarratt8869

2 ай бұрын

They're certainly knocking it out of park at the moment. Two amazing *emissions compliant* NA V12s for Aston Martin and Gordon Murray. Why not sling 4 more pots on for Bugatti?! It'd be interesting to see the inlet plenum in detail; I think that's where their combustion witchcraft is hidden.

@jamescorderjr1274

2 ай бұрын

I mean Cosworth making insane engines is kinda their MO

@abarratt8869

2 ай бұрын

@@jamescorderjr1274 certainly is, but they're surely in a golden age right now. Makes me wonder what Ferrari will do, they'd love an engine like these (the V12 certainly) in one of their cars, but can they do it or would they too have to make the pilgrimage to Northampton and Cosworth's reception desk?

@falcongamer5867

2 ай бұрын

Are there other engine builders other than cosworth? It seems to me they're the only ones mentioned when people talk about dedicated engine builders

@Rezcuz

2 ай бұрын

@@falcongamer5867 Because they're the best. Go google other ones.

Great stuff, truly! How refreshing and wow that sound 🔥

You can give so much more knowledge using a whiteboard and a few pictures - than (maybe) all of the animated videos here on YT! Love your channel, but this video is absolut outstanding. Thank you so much! Greetings from Austria 🇦🇹!

You are maturing as a lecturer Young Man. Congratulations. That was one of the best I ever saw on my favorite subject.

@EngineeringExplained

2 ай бұрын

Thanks for the kind words!

Love you, love your videos, love engineering and learning. My Croatian buddies want me to tell you that Mate Rimac is pronounced Ma-tay Ree-match. The way you said it makes him sound like an Australian bloke clearing his throat.

@EngineeringExplained

2 ай бұрын

This comment is 10/10, thank you! And appreciate the correction.

@user-xj7ms2hy7l

2 ай бұрын

It's Ree-matz

@isaac4273

2 ай бұрын

I was trying to read that phonetically at first, then I double read it and realized "hold up, it's Croatian, I just have to sound it out like a heterosexual Slovenian" 😂

@CanadianN1NJ4

2 ай бұрын

It's not "ree-match" it's "ree-mah-ts" as it doesn't have an accent on the c at the end

As always, absolutely amazing presentation. Thank you Jason!

That's pretty sweet. I have wanted to build a paired V8 V16 out of Ford 460s for a while now, just something about a 15L V16 that's appealing. It's interesting that they are doing this this way, my first choice plan was to run the front one in standard rotation but the rear one in reverse rotation, butted together, with the power going aft via a shaft slung underneath from the flywheel end. Hopefully they aren't going to have too much of an issue with crankshaft flex in that, or with block shifting.

In 1938, Cadillac completely re-engineered the V-16, brought out a flathead design on a 135-degree plan. It was nearly an opposed 16, gave much lower silhouette, put most accessories on top. Two downright carbs helped give 185 hp. Only 514 L-head V16s were sold. A V-12 wasn't made during this time, and Cadillac dropped this 431-inch V-16 completely by end of 1940.

@Prestiged_peck

2 ай бұрын

A 430 inch engine making 185 horsepower is absolutely depressing

@spadeespada9432

2 ай бұрын

@@Prestiged_peck Not back then.

@The1trueDave

2 ай бұрын

@@Prestiged_peck I'm fairly sure the straight-8 Duesenberg* was making 250+ (in NA form) the best part of a decade earlier. Mind you those 2 carbs in the Cadillac must have been working hard to supply 8 cylinders each! *also around 430 ci IIRC...

@jakelee5456

Ай бұрын

The Cadillac V16 wasn't so much about outright power, but supreme smoothness.

@hendo337

Ай бұрын

​@@The1trueDaveDusenberg was 420ci 6.9L 265hp N/A, it was DOHC, the 430ci Cadillac 135deg V16 was flat head and it made the same 185hp as the late 452ci OHV 45deg V16 and it started at only 165hp. The V16s were significantly less expensive, low rpm engines designed to effortlessly at low rpms move around a huge limousine with only 3 gears in a time where it was uncommon to travel faster than 70mph, more of a truck engine, where the Dusenberg was like a double Offenhouser I4 or an aero engine that ran at higher rpms and depended upon breathing to make the 265 and 300 gross HP while still being acceptably tractable down low in a heavy vehicle.

thanks for the thorough overview with your signature explanation process.

@JSFGuy

2 ай бұрын

You haven't even watched it yet.

@EngineeringExplained

2 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

@xrmerkur

2 ай бұрын

⁠@@EngineeringExplained74.4 lb per liter is extremely solid. i’m curious to know as well if it indeed is naturally aspirated. you always do a phenomenal job breaking down the details.

@LuGer212

2 ай бұрын

shut up. dude got a like and heart-thingy and followed up afterwards. go weep,@@JSFGuy

Great video thoroughly enjoy this breakdown

That firing order breakdown was a work of art!

Man that was an awesome video. I was really glued to the screen. Especially how the firing order is mirrored. It makes so much sense when you understand it. Thank you.

@EngineeringExplained

2 ай бұрын

Very happy to hear it, appreciate ya watching!

I'm really happy you are still putting out content. I've been watching your channel since the beginning!

Great info ! really helped me decide which Bugatti to buy

I remember seeing videos from Mate about starting modding cars in his garage, he's now presenting Bugatti cars. Crazy.

When Mate Rimac said they were developing something unique and new I was hoping for a star engine 😅. Laid on its side, with like 9 cylinders at least, turbocharged and electrical valves

@diegorhoenisch62

2 ай бұрын

I believe what you are describing as a star engine is formally known as a radial engine. They were popular in aviation in the 1940s and 50s.

@raullasvegas

2 ай бұрын

That also sound like something Christian would make and not Mate

I don’t think most will understand this level of explanation and ability to switch this level of thought process between each matrix is just mind bending.

Jason, your forensic math skills recently have been on point, from the cybertruck quarter mile video to this one. Keep it up 👍🏽

I can imagine trade schools and university engineering courses seriously using your videos in their curriculum. I'm an armchair mechanic myself, but it's information like this that allows me to understand and geek out even more about this stuff. I'd love more information about motorcycle and industrial power plants as well. Armed with a whiteboard, nothing can stop you! Also, have you thought about a collaboration with Mark Rober?

I could listen to you talking about engines all day long man!! Just pure bliss.

@garybulwinkle82

Ай бұрын

Half way through and I'm lost!! Better start over!!

Excellent analysis as always. Thank you!

I don't know if this is a new thing, but the animation of the exhaust flow while explaining the sequential turbo setup was a very nice touch.

Cosworth is on fire lately. Making some of the best engines out there. The GMA T50… 🤤😍

@Slizzo82

Ай бұрын

Lately? Man that's always been their game.

@NinjaRunningWild

Ай бұрын

@@Slizzo82 They haven't been represented anywhere I or most other car enthusiasts care about until recently. No Cosworth in Ferrari, Lamborghini, Bugatti, Porsche, et al. Whatever niche area you're referring to no one cares about.

@lorddoosworth8175

Ай бұрын

@@NinjaRunningWild maybe not in your country but worldwide they have for a very long time (since at least the 80s)

@EngineeringExplained :: Not sure if anyone pointed this out already, but as a native speaker of Serbo-Croatian, I can tell you two things - 1) Mate Rimac is pronounced as Muh-teh Ree-mah-ts ; 2) The phrasing Mate used in conjunction with the emoticon may actually translate to something along the lines of "oh, that's rich...", as that specific phrasing is very often used sarcastically, much more so than its direct meaning as a praise. Just thought I'd throw a spanner in the works :D

@EngineeringExplained

2 ай бұрын

Thanks! I included the original comment because translations often aren't directly accurate, so appreciate you chiming in! Were you to guess, does the language sound affirmative or more like "no way"? Because I think even sarcastically you might say "oh wow now THAT would be cool ;)" in a way that's like hey please don't spill all the details just yet.

@randomnik70

2 ай бұрын

@@EngineeringExplained I added a separate comment, but in most cases it translates to something like a playful "nice try, although you're wrong". BTW your numbers were very conservative. 1000+1000 is much too low. They'll probably push for 2x electric 750hp each, plus 1500 combustion. They have to make a crazier car than Koenigsegg's ~2300 HP.

@Shadsuna

2 ай бұрын

@@EngineeringExplained I had posted a follow-up, but it contained a link to another comment on Facebook, which might be why KZread mods (or even you) deleted it. Anyway, the gist of it was that Mate Rimac seems to be very stingy with responding to comments on his posts, and the response I had linked was one confirming the engine is N/A with a simple "Yep." to one of the commenters in an earlier post Rimac had made. The only other direct response he gave to commenters about any of this was along the lines of "all shall be revealed in due time". This all leads me to believe that the commenter you pointed out (Heinz Schenk) was onto something, and the snarky sarcastic handwave was probably a misdirection attempt. I can't be sure about the electric engine(s) power figure(s), but I do think you're just about correct; something tells me Bugatti-Rimac didn't go through the trouble of designing such an elaborate ICE powertrain just to have it play second fiddle to the electric subsystem - I doubt they'd want it overshadowed by the electric motors. @randomnik70 :: I doubt Jason overestimated the engine power, given how simple the intake manifolds and the valvetrain look; to get much more efficiency without traditional forced induction, they'd have to have an elaborate variable valve timing and duration system with some huge valves/ports and also probably rammed air (scooped from the front and inducted into the manifolds), as what Jason proposes is already pushing it in terms of volumetric efficiency.

@tamasszabo8824

2 ай бұрын

Máté is a Hungarian name, as well.

hell yeah, loved this video and subscribed.

I'm most impressed with your your analysis, well presented too, as usual.

In all the years I’ve seen your videos this one is really really well made. Your knowledge and ability to explain is incredible. Greetings from Denmark 🇩🇰

@EngineeringExplained

2 ай бұрын

Cheers, thanks for watching and appreciate the kind words!!

I am studying chemical engineering, and I absolutely love your videos man! If you don't mind, I would be glad to see some more chemistry related stuff :D I really enjoyed your videos about the Li-ion batteries.

@EngineeringExplained

2 ай бұрын

Chemistry has always been tough for me! I've got a battery video going on in the background, and the chemistry is ooof!

@MyHvorfor

2 ай бұрын

Haha, I know the feeling! For me it has always been statics and dynamics that have been challenging @@EngineeringExplained

so cool how easy u made this to understand 👍

Wow, finally a new engine! Looks stunning! That Mate Rimac guy is the best!

THANK YOU for another high-quality, old-style, whiteboard video instead of a not-so-well-sounding unmounted vlog :D (the explanations are crystal-clear, great work)

Personally, I think it would be cool to see something like this be able to have distinctive modes. A 100% full blown push the brain into the back of your skull mode and a mode that could get you 40 mpg. Imagine having a green and a red key for your Bugatti so you could also get 400 miles to the tank if you were so inclined... just because you could.

Imagine how much simpler it is to package and cool a NA v16//electric combo. Vs. Quad turbo v16. Not to mention how beautiful that new motor will be NA.

God damn Jason... I wish we were all even half as smart as you. You got all of this information from just a few pictures. Fine work sir.

Man, time and time again you prove yourself to be one of the best channels on KZread. Having access to information like this is one of the few ways the internet contributes positively to the world, in my opinion.

@EngineeringExplained

2 ай бұрын

So so warming to read - means a lot to me, thank you!!

One of my all-time favorite engineers! It takes real genius to be able to digest the computation and physics of engineering, and turn it into something genuinely enthusiastic. Well done, Jason!

@markplott4820

Ай бұрын

3x Electric motors , BEAT any ICE Engine.

Go over the primary and secondary forces in this configuration .

I can confirm from my friend who works at Bugatti it’s a 1000hp na motor with 1000hp duel electric hub motors at each front wheel. I got to see a video of the first start up at cossworths engine Dyno over a year ago

2:26 very nice

The review of this Bugatti need to be Jason² !

@EngineeringExplained

2 ай бұрын

Oohh, I'd love that!

@Harry_Gersack

2 ай бұрын

That'd be really cool. Those two have such a good dynamic

Why were u not in my school, perhaps I would learn something :O great video!

I would assume whatever future car Bugatti will put the V16 in won’t be specifically designed for top speed because the hybrid system wouldn’t work when trying to reach the highest possible speed since there would be no regenerative braking and the engine would be better suited to just send all of its power straight to the wheels.

Can you make a video on the pistonless engine omega 1? Would love to have your take on this.

@joe13c00l2

2 ай бұрын

What has the world come to..... Pistonless engines? Wtf man

@Foulback2

2 ай бұрын

@joe13c00l2 with engines that use pistons, there is a lot of reciprocating mass and with the omega 1 it spins in one direction, making it a more efficient motor. Thus more power for the same amount of work.

@PrinceAlhorian

2 ай бұрын

​@@joe13c00l2It's called a Wankel Rotary, not a piston in sight. 80 year old tech.

@joe13c00l2

2 ай бұрын

Shoot...I forgot about rotary engines...i always thought of the dorito as a piston tho...@@PrinceAlhorian

@JoshuaTootell

2 ай бұрын

Turbines are technically piston less internal combustion engines too...

Cosworth are the masters of NA engines in this era, if you want a good NA engine go to Cosworth.

@N4CR5

2 ай бұрын

Or Judd.

I'm suffering for that crankshaft already! Imagine the torque trasfer from the 1st cylinder to the flywheel at the end

The idea of Bugatti having hard time counting is honestly hilarious, and it could explain why they made a V16 and not something smaller.

@13:31 Cool to see where "5252" comes from, and that it's more specifically 33,000/2π.

@EngineeringExplained

2 ай бұрын

The full story is actually really interesting, if, you know... you're interested! kzread.info/dash/bejne/mXdmj6yEf5PJYqw.htmlsi=5oC5Sfz8dpUupw_a

T50, Valkyrie, and now this... Cosworth keeping the art of the NA ICE alive, no one does it like them anymore. Interesting engines with hybrid assist replacing turbos is something I hope trickles down to more affordable sports cars before the EV age

@abarratt8869

2 ай бұрын

Been there, still wearing the T shirt. Our Honda Jazz has a 1.5L NA engine and hybrid assist! Sadly the software conspires to not unleash all 200bhp the plant could theoretically deploy. However, it is the first Jazz to be capable of wearing out its front tyres.

@inevespace

2 ай бұрын

NA ICE alive everywhere. For example you can combine 16 450cc dirtbike engines and get same characteristics as guessed in the video. And engineers of this engines don't shoot for high hp nowadays. So it is quite basic tech (you can have 300hp/L nowadays if you want). Moreover, full EV is a dead end. We just don't have enough lithium to make batteries to electrify all cars. I reckon next 20-30 years will be hybrids until we find some alternative to Li based batteries.

Downside of the straight eight is crankshaft torsion, sometimes referred to as whipping. I'm wondering how it's managed in this V16 if it's driven off the end of the engine? In a W16 I can see how the compact arrangement of the cylinders reduces crankshaft (and engine) length effectively making the crankshaft about the length of an inline 5 or 6.

can not wait to see you on a test ride in the bugatti !

that crank must be heavy af

@itsdokko2990

2 ай бұрын

imagine the crank wobble, such a long boi must wobble like crazy. i'm sure they thought of that

@ivanstefanac1144

2 ай бұрын

1 meter long😅

@JoshuaTootell

2 ай бұрын

Crankshafts on my last ship were like 30' long. They can figure it out 😂

@dsdy1205

2 ай бұрын

​@JoshuaTootell sure but it was probably also as wide as ur mom, that makes it less wobbly

@2:27 Nice

The photo almost makes the crank look like a 45/135° all the way down, but if it were, that 45° offset between the two halves, wouldn't be able to exist as it does, and it's quite evident. Maybe we can have a video on how this engine sounds totally flatplane even though it's clearly not. Would also like to see the math on that crank. Two 90°x4 cranks offset by 45° between the halves is really interesting. Jason, pretty please??? 🙏😁

the cizeta moroder was a v16 in 91

@Vidarx2

2 ай бұрын

Was it a prodcution car though?

@MainInternetUser

2 ай бұрын

I mean 8 production vehicles is it really a production car ? Those early 20th century v16s has hundreds of examples

@CyanRooper

2 ай бұрын

Rare cars are considered production vehicles even when they are made in single digit numbers.

@Miwna

2 ай бұрын

Cadillac made a V16 in 1930. They made 4000 of them.

@Emira_75

2 ай бұрын

Nah not really ​@@CyanRooper they're not series production vehicles. More homologated concept cars

2:27 "69% larger, nice" - quote of the year.

Jason, please do a video about the "dilemma zone" when approaching a traffic light. In other words, when the light turns yellow and you have two options; slam on the breaks or speed through a red light. Thanks

V16 NA?!? That must sound outstanding 😮😮

@v4skunk739

2 ай бұрын

Cosworth v16 too.

@TheMDJ2000

Ай бұрын

Have a listen to the BRM V16

CIZETA MORODER V16T 1995

I love this video! Good stuff Maynard. As for the Engineering the Veyron, at this point an aircraft gas turbine would be lighter and have more horsepower, and I bet that it would cost less. For example Jay Leno built a gas turbine car based on a corvette chassis.

J .. could you do a video explaining turbo compound ? (Couldnt find a previous one in the video list) Thank you .. great vid as always !

I dont understand why this makes sense to me, the way he explains things just makes sense it's great 🙌🏽 as long as you have a basic understanding of engines, this video is perfect

out of reach for 99.999% of us

@king_br0k

2 ай бұрын

I think there needs to be another couple 9s

@meanman6992

2 ай бұрын

@@king_br0kcame to say what he said

@canihave1dab724

2 ай бұрын

Cry more. It’s a modern engineering marvel. Stop being envious and just appreciate a cool thing for existing.

@RadialSeeker113

2 ай бұрын

More like 99.99999375% Assuming 500 people get one.

@tommyboi0

2 ай бұрын

​@@canihave1dab724 Exactly!

I'm ready to build my own V 32! Thank you Professor.

You actually made math fun and understandable. I could hug you right now =D Thanx for the explanation!

The Cizeta-Moroder V16T was produced in 1991-2003 so it's more like 33-21 years ago since we last saw a car with that engine layout.

Awesome! Can’t wait for details!

I love when car manufacturers do things outside the norm...big props to bugatti