Anyone who break their Constitutional oaths...should be charged with Treason!!!

@williamdurdin1964

11 күн бұрын

Perfectly said, thank you

Infringement is unconstitutional. Period. Never trust anyone who wants you defenseless

@pennyelliot171

Ай бұрын

Amen..trust no one who want you defenseless. Democrats want Americans to be their slaves.

The Supreme Court needs to send this decision to ALL federal Bureaucracies, State Capitols, and big city mayors!!!

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED...PERIOD!

The sentence that needs to be followed is "shall NOT be infringed" period !!!

@timculpepper4939

9 ай бұрын

🙏 THANK YOU

@mariosaati7110

3 ай бұрын

@@timculpepper4939Amen 🙏 May You Patriot Christian Brother Always Stand Strong In Faith And Truth Like A Lion Fearless Amen 🙏 Hope You And Your Whole Family Had A Wonderful And Blessed New Year 20-24 And May All Your Prayers And All Your Dreams Come True In Life’s Journey Amen 🙏

Okay, now somebody tell the FEDS this.

@copperhead550

10 ай бұрын

Feds can not read. Feds will not listen. Feds act like an angry child.

@cmike22000

10 ай бұрын

The sate of Michigan is violating this ruling right NOW. They don't care what the Constitution says, or the Supreme Court! They, along with the Feds are Communists!

@M_Ryze

10 ай бұрын

@@gerardbeck457 Idk, Texas did push that one suppressor freedom law.

@cmike22000

10 ай бұрын

@@gerardbeck457 Sure are!!

@gunsnwater2668

10 ай бұрын

So nothing new except a video?

Self-defense is necessary in a violent world. And this world has ALWAYS been violent.

Thomas really stepped up. He continues like this and maybe we'll have our first supreme court justice on our currency in another generation.

Shall not be infringe means any laws against the second amendment is infringement..

@jamesmorrisett3020

10 ай бұрын

Amen

@SonOfNone

10 ай бұрын

Right? I'm sure this "one sentence" from this youtuber will _finally_ set everything straight........

@trikstari7687

10 ай бұрын

The problem is that arguments to the contrary are accepted as legitimate political speech, instead of being treated as the acts of treason that they are.

@UnknownMoses

10 ай бұрын

@SonOfNone So because they are only one person they shouldn’t bother saying anything? If everyone held that perspective our constitution would be weak and would not last.

@Melvinmutt

10 ай бұрын

​@@SonOfNoneread the constitution

Since the late 1790’s, lots of WASTED court and legislative time and money. We the People need to be demanding reimbursement.

@ericschneider8524

2 ай бұрын

Let's start by defunding the entire public school system. Make parents responsible for their own children's education. Now the feds are using every taxpayer's money to indoctrinate the masses. Half the young people don't even vote.

Finally a COURT THAT UNDERSTANDS THE WORDS (SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.) Now can we defund the ATF.

I'm glad to hear someone else that understands that arms are not limited to guns.

@bwilderd5082

9 ай бұрын

Can I have a tank? And can I blow up my neighbors for their loud parties and driving on my lawn when they drunkenly leave at 2 in the morning. Fuck, I don’t see why not. I’m defending my property. With a tank. At least a bazooka. There ain’t no fucking law that can deny me at tank or a hand grenade, right. Right. Thank you Mr. Clarence.

@gemanscombe4985

9 ай бұрын

This video poster's brain has fallen and can't get up. 1) Previous SCOTUS decisions have affirmed restrictions as constitutional. That's also historical precedent to be overturned. 2) ALL arms and weapons will be unregulated? Wake up! That would include fragmentation grenades, RPGs, chemical and bio-weapons, mines, armed drones, explosive vests... . Tanks and A10 Warthogs, if "bearing" includes driving vehicles.Some here, of course, will happily nod "yes". 3) This is based on a single sentence from Clarence Thomas, a ninth of SCOTUS, as he interprets recent SCOTUS decisions. Please review his interpretation of gift$ and goodie$ from his buddy Harlan Crowe and his decision to stop reporting them for the past 20 years so that we can give his legal judgment all the scrutiny it deserves. 4) Make the above weapons readily available and you will find that also having them at hand will not make you safer than before. You'll only be safer having them than not having them IN A NEW SITUATION OF YOUR OWN MAKING. A side benefit is that some won't need Viagra as often, though.

@r3steve1

9 ай бұрын

If we want to know what the Constitution really says, use the Websters 1828 Dictionary. Arms are 'weapons of offense, or armor for defense and protection", war hostility. In law, arms are anything which a man may take in his hand in anger, to strike or assault another. So it seems canons and nukes can be regulated, but if you can carry it, it seems to be covered by Arms.

@gemanscombe4985

9 ай бұрын

@r3steve1 Granulated plutonium and anthrax spores are portable but covered by other regulations. Rats! But shoulder-launched missiles are okay. Well, as long as a good guy with a Javelin is around to counter the bad guy with his Javelin... . Are there any LAWS rockets still around? Claymores? And is concealed carry okay for Stingers down by the end of a runway, or just open carry? As long as the 767 is packing a Stinger, too, it's all good ... right? No? But why should a law-abiding bearer of a Stinger have his 2nd Amendment rights restricted b/c of the actions of criminals? Why, indeed? More Stingers, less shoot downs. Criminals will always get Stingers. [edit: And I forgot "Stingers don't shoot down planes, people shoot down planes"] The logic is impeccable.

@user-bu2en3cl6s

9 ай бұрын

...or certain TYPES of guns.

Right! It is time these government criminals are arrested and held accountable.

@ct4074

10 ай бұрын

The fed. U.S. gov. is a criminal organization that is seeking to destroy the 1st Am. and the 2nd Am. to reserve power to themselves, and satiate their greed.

@pauldeanda4985

10 ай бұрын

It will never happen!

@Kevin-ys7sj

10 ай бұрын

They aren't government, and certainly they are criminals!

@user-tn1hk6zm2f

10 ай бұрын

I think your right.@@pauldeanda4985

@David-pg5yv

10 ай бұрын

Quit voting them in office

There was once a sheriff that said if there were any gun laws that were deemed unconstitutional and if gun confiscation among law abiding citizens were to happen, he'd deputize every gun owner in the county.

@tiedyehobo

9 ай бұрын

I'm a criminal because I grew weed. Now I can't own a gun. I broke the law. I'm a criminal.

@williamfowler9196

9 ай бұрын

​@@tiedyehobothat too will be found to be unconstitutional. If you are free and have payed your debit to society you should have ALL you rights restored....

@thes.a.s.s.1361

9 ай бұрын

@@williamfowler9196 I know someone who committed a felony in 1996. He still can't own a firearm or if he gets a little Saturday night special and shoots a guy for breaking and entering his house, he has to face additional criminal charges.

@williamfowler9196

9 ай бұрын

@@thes.a.s.s.1361 it's a said state of affairs and I hate to say it but as it is right now, your right... But it's not for much longer. When Tomas wrote, the second amendment is not a second class right, everything changed. It's going to take a little time but it's coming. Just believe in our constitution and our country...

@outdoorsman7324

9 ай бұрын

He can say it all he wants, he's limited by his own jurisdiction... kind of stupid to think otherwise.

I imagine thousands of corrupt lawyers should loose their license and be barred . I think that is disbarred. 😞

"Shall not be infringed".

I'm not a republican, or a Democrat I'm a strict constitutionalist and I've been saying this cens 1968 when I went in the military

@jasoncooper4737

10 ай бұрын

Welcome home, sir.

@bfin

10 ай бұрын

Thank you for your service.

@russelder9743

10 ай бұрын

Brother ....with you

@RodMartinJr

10 ай бұрын

Bless you! And you may want to join the John Birch Society -- patriots fighting the Deep State since 1958! Too bad I heard only lies about them in the 60s, otherwise I would've joined. 😎♥✝🇺🇸💯

@JrJVintage1956

10 ай бұрын

since

That's why we need to elevate violations of the Constitution to criminal status.

@johnpyle8027

10 ай бұрын

Felony! Mandatory 10 years!

@TeamZcan

10 ай бұрын

Those violations are already of criminal status. The DOJ is utterly corrupted.

@kevinclark8782

10 ай бұрын

There already are. The problem is, the ones would would enforce that law are the ones who violate it.

@NumberSixAtTheVillage

10 ай бұрын

@@kevinclark8782 - Where in the legal code is it an actual punishable criminal violation to actually go against the constitution?

@yelleryoung5870

10 ай бұрын

I am glad you think tRump should be treated as a criminal.

I hope everybody begins to see this that way.

NOW THEY HAVE TO MAKE A NATIONWIDE STATEMENT SO THE COUNTRY KNOWS ABOUT IT

No restrictions to carry in government buildings, public places like schools, etc… Some people are concerned with this, but this is freedom. Many are actually uncomfortable with freedom, but don’t even realize it.

@russelder9743

10 ай бұрын

well said

@MarilynStangl

10 ай бұрын

Gun-free zones are much more dangerous, especially now that so many mentally ill people think of mass shooting as their path to fame!

@John2r1

10 ай бұрын

Bet we will have a reduction in school shootings when the adults have guns and know how to use them. Just saying if this becomes reality society will go back to being safe again. Because people are polite when they don't know what you have in your waistband or pocket.

@SoloRenegade

10 ай бұрын

yes! they are uncomfortable with freedom. they are fearful of people being armed, but not realizing if everyone is armed, people aren't going to try crap either.

@francischambless5919

10 ай бұрын

@@SoloRenegade less likely. I think it's fair to say that more than flat out not going to. There are always psychos.

Then they should get rid of nics and prohibition laws!

“the government must demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition.” ~Justice Clarence Thomas

Having spent many years in politics as a consultant, it made me realize that only a very few politicians care more about the opinions of their constituents than they do lobbyist dollars. That’s why I don’t trust most of them and why I’m out of that business. The courts are now just an extension of the political world and care more about legacy than legality. It’s that simple.

@peterboytRaKs

9 ай бұрын

I'll go as far as to say, that all three (3) branches of US Government have drunk the Kool Aid and are bought off.

Sounds like someone woke up had a good strong cup of coffe and then read and understood the second amendment !!!! good for Clarence Thomas !!!

No place is as dangerous as a gun free zone

The ATF needs to be held to this ruling. PERIOD.

The real problem is taking it to court cost hundreds of thousands to prove your rights.

There really needs to be a class action against certain agencies for violating our rights and violating the law by maintaining an illegal database/records catalogue of background check forms, both paper and electronic. Get it into a court of law and through the discovery proccess, force them to disclose that they are in fact actively maintaining these databases.

@Asertix357

10 ай бұрын

What good will it do? The ATF is above the law, and in fact that redefine and change law at a whim, as evidenced by SCOTUS allowing their latest rules to stand.

@sigitasp.3207

10 ай бұрын

Class action? why the 2A is there in the first place? Use it

@jonmunch3298

10 ай бұрын

Like most federal agencies.

@arteriusmaximus4200

10 ай бұрын

Who will hold anyone or any entity accountable for violating the rights of citizens when it pertains to the U.S. Constitution?

@jonmunch3298

10 ай бұрын

@@arteriusmaximus4200 Absolutely no one an so I guess both sides better unite or we will all be arguing from our tents while the elite douchebags in DC continue to live it up.

INALIENABLE: "A Right that can not be taken away from you". ~Cambridge Dictionary

@gridtac2911

10 ай бұрын

Original text was "unalienable"... Not inalienable. There's a difference.

@crazysquirrel9425

10 ай бұрын

@@gridtac2911 same meaning different spelling

@stovepipe1015

10 ай бұрын

@@gridtac2911What??? Both words mean the same exact thing!!! Now check this word out..'Unreal', as in You are.

@Kevin_P_H

23 күн бұрын

@@stovepipe1015😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣

I’ve been saying this for years. The first time I heard that was the weighing factor, I knew they didn’t have a leg to stand on. It’s, as far as I know, the only right the specifically uses the phrase “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!” I was damn near ready to go take the bar exam just so I could argue it. For those who don’t know, it can be a fairly quick process, becoming a lawyer, here in Cali…

@cathylucas3653

9 ай бұрын

No, I don’t know that! I’m in Commiefornia- spill your knowledge! Please!

@11nica5

9 ай бұрын

Tell me more. I believe there’s a way without going to law school

@louiegonzales1407

9 ай бұрын

@@cathylucas3653 trump is the one selling classified documents to the commies and other crimes but but Hunter.

@lovestodesign

9 ай бұрын

@@11nica5 I’m not a lawyer or an expert but coincidentally, I heard a story on TV recently about a guy that’s a lawyer, but didn’t go to school for it, just passed the bar…Hope that helps.

History repeats itself. That's why the founding fathers wrote these laws. They knew shit would hit the fan again.

Let’s GO !! Keep fighting my US 2A brothers and sisters. 👍🏻

@mikeballew3283

10 ай бұрын

And inforce 14-3 on all inserctionist 🧐

@carlmorgan8452

10 ай бұрын

Enalable rights are from GOD ...... therefore undebatable !

Sure would be nice if we could let our Governors know about these Supreme Court decisions

@ohwell2790

10 ай бұрын

They know, they don't care and neither do police until they get their A** sued and loose.

@jayejaycurry5485

10 ай бұрын

They know. They may not care.

@jcee2259

10 ай бұрын

If reader has a new luxury EV just off an ocean car-carrier, you'll need an extra-large blanket, to communicate by using smoke signals.

@JP-gi7dw

10 ай бұрын

​@@jayejaycurry5485why would they care when the well-trained law abiding 🐑🐑 keep VOTING for their masters?? 😂😂😂

@jayejaycurry5485

10 ай бұрын

@@jcee2259 Are you in the right conversation?

Prayers for my Father that God sends someone to help him now.

I have a Federal felony conviction. Is there any way to get back my right to own a gun other than a presidential pardon?

@kevinsoete7817

2 ай бұрын

YES…RUN FOR PRESIDENT….GET ELECTED…. GET SWORN IN PARDON YOURSELF

I couldn't agree more !!! Shall not be infringed !!!

How about a CLASS ACTION LAW SUIT for the US CORPORATION MASQUERADING AS A GOVERNMENT ??????

@MarilynStangl

10 ай бұрын

Well, since they are the legal system, do you really think that they will act against themselves?

@pissedoffamerican4869

10 ай бұрын

@@MarilynStangl what's LEGAL isn't always LAWFUL. What's lawful is the Constitution for the united states of America. If you dont know the difference I suggest you do some studying. Start with CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW vs. ENGLISH MARITIME LAW(admiralty jurisdiction) Act of 1871 UNUM SANCTUM TRUST of 1302 Pope boniface CESTUI QUE VIE TRUSTS of 1666. Read the creature from Jekyll island. I could go on and on but you do your own due diligence. Look up everyday COMMON words you use in a law dictionary. Like "driver" "traffic" "person" . "Ens legis" Ask yourself how can anyone "represent" themselves if represent means "to stand in place of. Hmmmm that should make you think. Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for the lack of knowledge. THERE HAVEND BEEN JUDICIAL COURT IN AMERICA SINCE 1789. ARRICL 1 TRIBUNALS ARE NOT ARTICLE 3 COURTS. ITS ALL ADMINISTRATIVE.

@thatguyrich9822

10 ай бұрын

@@pissedoffamerican4869 Lemme guess.... SovCit?

@sherylreed3558

10 ай бұрын

Good Lord, isn't IT ABOUT TIME!!? IF no one is going to go the non violent route if Convention of States-(which is ALSO CONSTITUTIONAL way for WE THE PEOPLE to wrestle back control from this insane GUB'MENT), I've been sayin same as you! MASSIVE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT! PROBLEM is they own all the Judicial system too!!

@pissedoffamerican4869

10 ай бұрын

@@thatguyrich9822 and you a LBGTQ MEMBER .

IT MUST BE ANOUNCED NATIONWIDE

We never should’ve given an inch. Once you give up your rights willingly, you’ll almost never get them back. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!!!

Four simple words sums it up in it's entirety. "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"! PERIOD!! No little bit here, little bit there. NONE!!! NO LAW, REGULATION, CODE SHALL BE CONSTITUTIONAL!👍✌️🖖🇺🇸

@CTuna-uo3pq

10 ай бұрын

Exactly

@perindne

10 ай бұрын

I am a VERY pro gun person. My fear is some criminal nuts buy automatic weapons and wreck the lives of innocent people. @@CTuna-uo3pq

Mr. Clarence Thomas is a great justice. Godspeed Mark. Keep the fight on and keep the 2 amendment. Amen.🙏🙏

@wallychambe1587

10 ай бұрын

Notice how the demoncrats went after him when he didn't rule in their favor, they tried to discredit him!🤬🤬

@91210paige

10 ай бұрын

That's why the Dems are attacking him.

@lylealexson8680

10 ай бұрын

"great justice" Thomas is corrupt. It's well known and reported that he's dirty corrupt, and he's been enriching himself through his seat on the supreme court for years.

@Danafondo

10 ай бұрын

That’s why they are going after him for supposed ethical issues.

@91210paige

10 ай бұрын

Exactly Dana, Schummer said it when he said the Deep state has 6 ways till Sunday to get back at you if you go up against the Deep state.

Wow. That's a real eye opener. Stand strong with God and God bless America. ♥️🙏♥️🙏🙏♥️🇺🇸

When will all accept and abide by SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!

So "Shall not be infringed" means exactly that.

🙋🏾‍♂️ God bless Mr. Clarence Thomas!

@terryderush2657

10 ай бұрын

110 % 👍 agree

Shall not be infringed upon.

I totally agree that you have a right to keep and bear arms as stated in the 2nd Amendment.

The Constitution is not just about guns it is the foundation of our laws and rights. Thanks for sharing

It`s amazing how much foresight they had when writing the Constitution. They knew there would be scumbags trying to take our freedom.

@denisekarolewski640

10 ай бұрын

They were trying to do it to them too and that was a long time ago. Somethings never change.

@mrmotofy

10 ай бұрын

Power greed and corruption has been going on since the beginning

@ERG173

10 ай бұрын

Redman ...... how does that compare with scumbags trying to take our children's lives ??

@David_Quinn_Photography

10 ай бұрын

England has not changed at all, they didn't want their teritories armed for the exact reason we faught back.

@ERG173

10 ай бұрын

@@David_Quinn_Photography would you like to rearrange those words so they make sense ??

When your neighbors don't comply, back them up!!!

Love your Content! Excellent! Freedom to bear Arms!

I think our constitution flew out the window a long time ago as far as government is concerned 😢

@jeremystone7709

10 ай бұрын

Yes that is very true. I am thankful I am not the only person who understands this is fact.

@elizabethy2912

10 ай бұрын

Right about the time, Ovomit took office.

@waynej9238

10 ай бұрын

@@elizabethy2912nah longer than that, way before you were born

@MegaBait1616

10 ай бұрын

The Dem.'s Hate our Constitution bottom line........

@elizabethy2912

10 ай бұрын

@@waynej9238 You are probably right. I used to tell my family, " Ovomit probably used the Constitution , Bill of Rights, and Declaration of Independence as his TOILET PAPER, the first night after he was inaugurated. It made me sick to think of him desecrating our WH. He was our proverbial nail in the coffin.

"Arms" doesn't just refer to weaponry, it means any means to assist in survival. This includes armor.

@jakeaurod

10 ай бұрын

Nukes? I know some 2A absolutists who claim that.

@thesenuts603

10 ай бұрын

if youre smart enough to build it, then you should have it. @@jakeaurod

@EricKelkenberg

10 ай бұрын

1.) How many people can afford nukes? 2.) Even if they could get a nuke legally, you could never use it legally. 2nd amendment is for the LAWFUL use of arms, if you are not using said arms illegally than yes you could own a nuke. There

@jakeaurod

10 ай бұрын

@@EricKelkenberg Good question. I think he was also a sovereign citizen type.

@EricKelkenberg

10 ай бұрын

@@jakeaurod all gun laws are under the illegal assumption that certain weapons are so dangerous and unusual that citizens only want them to break the law/ murder. That's why machine guns are illegally banned and they are trying so hard to ban "assault weapons" or semi auto rifles.

Omg! Absolutely agree! I remember the 2A was a major argument in my Con Law class in law school.. the Bruen decision is historic! No 2A restrictions should exists today by in any state. Bruen is clear … even to the subject of gum free zones …. The Bruen decision empowers every community.

Shall not be infringed.

Thanks for keeping us informed, Mark. This all needs to be put to bed once and for all.

SHALL not be INFRINGED!

Infringement is infringement

Thank you,America first,God bless,brother art

2A meant providing and protecting for your family as much as it means fighting a tyrannical government. Our government has no restrictions on arms

@ct4074

10 ай бұрын

The fed. U.S. gov. is a criminal organization that is seeking to destroy the 1st Am. and the 2nd Am. to reserve power to themselves, and satiate their greed.

@rangerdanger222

10 ай бұрын

2A is there to maintain life liberty and property.

@yusefalmutawakil3325

10 ай бұрын

The federal law is the law of the land and no law supersedes that but the state's seem to think their individual Constitution supercede federal law, probably because they're making trillions of dollars incarcerating people while violating this second amendment unaliable right at the same time

@Ricky043

10 ай бұрын

I can't legally buy a firearm so I'd say there is, I got in trouble years ago as kid in my 40s now with a family an a home an cannot LEGALLY PROTECT IT! it's protected but i wish it was legal

@thelakeman5207

10 ай бұрын

I could protect my family with a flame thrower. Is that protected under the Second Amendment.

Nothing but the truth preach brother!!!!!

Thank you,and may God bless America.

Shall no be infringed!!!!

Sadly, the Supreme Court doesn't have an enforcement arm

@jamesharrison6201

10 ай бұрын

They would if they were COMMIES like the executive branch is at this time

@user-im6fy4qp6m

10 ай бұрын

it does its called the 2nd amendment

@hectormartinez9657

10 ай бұрын

Totally agree. Gov Newsom here in California and ca atty gen Rob Bonta are making sure with new laws that ccw holders can’t be anywhere with their firearms in the entire state. Most people here have been waiting for over a year after submitting their ccw application and haven’t heard back from anyone.

@marlberg2963

10 ай бұрын

Be very glad that it does not have an enforcement arm. Give a court whose singular job is to interpret the law, the ability to enforce the law, and it rapidly becomes the dominant branch of government with absolute immunity from any sort of accountability because the judges or justices just send out their goon squads and it would be legitimate for them to do so.

@craigbolton5093

10 ай бұрын

Kinda like they do anyway?@@marlberg2963

THANK YOU, JUSTICE THOMAS!!

2A, 2A, 2A, I won't give up any of my rights.

The only way to stop these people from continuously trying to take our rights away is to allow us to physically stop them. Give us the right to stop these people when they come after your rights.

@Deploracle

10 ай бұрын

So you want the government to give you the permission to stop them?

@craigbolton5093

10 ай бұрын

We have that right naturally.

@Deploracle

10 ай бұрын

@@craigbolton5093 I think it's a duty actually.

@craigbolton5093

10 ай бұрын

Agreed @@Deploracle

@googleuser868

10 ай бұрын

Isn't that the reason we have the right to begin with. To stop tyranny.

It means nothing if they dont hold the people accountable for infringing our rights

Shall nor be infringed !!!

Thank you for "common sense" breakdowns of how laws SHOULD BE!

Looks like every rule or law needs to be challenged in the Courts now.

@debbiewulfhorst8355

9 ай бұрын

The government needs to go over every law passed and throw out every one that goes against the Constitution.

Excellent, we have to keep fighting to keep our constitutional rights.

Its called an "Unlawful Order"!!!

Everyone needs to hear this

The problem is the Supreme Court has ZERO power to enforce their rulings.

@mitch_the_-itch

10 ай бұрын

That was the entire idea behind three branches of Govt. What the founders never accounted for in our Constitution is when all three branches are firmly against the American people. Thats why they gave us the Declaration of Independence... What every American should be asking their neighbor is how much consent does this corrupt Govt think it needs? Is it still considered "consent" when only Govt employees and their families give consent anymore?

@davezemba9109

10 ай бұрын

It's up to the executive branch to enforce the supreme courts decisions. But with this administration in place you can forget that idea.

@jdam568

10 ай бұрын

It's up to the people now.

@Justin_Case01

10 ай бұрын

What is the point in even having the Supreme Court if people are not bound to follow its decisions? If the Executive Branch truly is the one tasked with enforcing their rulings, how is it possible that an administration can decide (on their own) which rulings they will and will not apply. This would seem to be in direct contrast to the oath of office that they took. Are you saying tjat there is no standard with which to hold them accountable? Surely any act in direct violation of the Constitution (such as the Executive Branch not following the rulings of the Supreme Court ) should be considered a direct violation of his oath of office. His neglect to follow the rulings should be side-stepped by Congress and enforced as the true law of the land. What we have now, with our current setup, is a "dog with no teeth". The Supreme Court determines the Constitutionality of a law. Their rulings should be enforced. If they (SC) finds a law unconstitutional, that law is abandoned. By the same token, if a law is found to be Constitutional, I would expect it to be upheld.

@patrickshaw8595

10 ай бұрын

@@jdam568 I have it on good authority that the armed populace of the United States of America is the World's Largest Armed Force. It actually dwarfs in size (if not in quality) all the world's armies. COMBINED.

They already know it. It's our willingness to do nothing about it - thats the problem !

2nd amendment, "shall not be infringed" clear as day

Thank you justice has been served!

The Constitution is for America. We should be able to carry in every state. Glad the SCOUS is following Constitution

I agree, shall not be infringed! I think we all should sue the feds.

Wow! Excellent!

Please help us to leave Georgia. We made a mistake when we moved here 18 years ago and now we're trapped here. Please help us to leave Georgia!

Absolutely Correct and they know that still they continue to push the people from their rights

Spot on 100%, which would also apply to GCA and NFA, both of which should be voided!

@curtisevans8413

10 ай бұрын

And the FOPA too! Fuck that bullshit. I'm not even American and I'm angry at the ATF. I only wish Britain had a party that even pretended to be pro gun.

@crazysquirrel9425

10 ай бұрын

And everything pursuant to those.

Thanks for a politely and neighborly exposition of this news story. We’re not all “gun nuts” and you’re a terrific advocate for us normal freedom loving people.

Violent Criminals and Criminals in general should not be allowed to have any weapons whatsoever. Aside from that all decent law abiding citizens should be allowed to protect and defend themselves.

Asking for prayer request for my two drug addicted children, Cody and Courtney. Thank you for ALL the prayers 🙏❤️.

@vicrawhog9582

10 ай бұрын

Prayers sent.

@mooktemas6800

10 ай бұрын

Praying 🙏🏾

@robedmund9948

10 ай бұрын

Father, please reach out to both Cody and Courtney and guide them to your son and healing. Amen.

@lyndakempland4559

10 ай бұрын

Prayers for your sons

@suepatterson1454

10 ай бұрын

Prayers sent

Text, history and tradition

I love it, and I think it should be brought up in every case, and if it applies, then it should be thrown out of court

Constitution is brilliant.

The given rights is what it was, God given!!! Next step is What???

I don't miss very many of your videos. I'm really happy about hearing this one. Keep bringing it Big Guy!

THAT'S WHAT I UNDERSTOOD ,, WE THE PPL.

I agree with you 💯%

I live in Illinois I am now a non complier and criminal. It is not so bad, we are figuring it out. just pissed off that we now have to do extra work for what we want.

@catwoman2596

10 ай бұрын

And for some reason you thought it'd be a wise decision to state that publicly...😑

@christopherovard379

10 ай бұрын

Hmmm… I don’t think you’re a criminal. The 2A says otherwise. We need to quit looking as if we are doing what is wrong, when they write unconstitutional laws. Blessings.

@EricKelkenberg

10 ай бұрын

The irony of being a "criminal" is that why would I follow a law that illegally restricts my inherent right to a weapon if I already don't follow the "law". Just because the government illegally makes it a crime for me to have a weapon doesn't mean I won't have any. I have heard many inmates say this.

@joehopper3720

10 ай бұрын

Which is precisely our patriotic duty; to openly and blatantly hold void & disregard any and all legislations which contradict the US Constitution!!! Had we all been honoring our duty we wouldn't be in this situation. I salute you. The founders of this nation were labeled criminals by the tyrants of their era, only they risked death rather than an incarceration sentence.

@brianhoxworth3881

10 ай бұрын

I live in rual southern Illinois, and hear way less gun practice going on around. Use to be basically, consistent gunfire daily. I guess people are afraid to break out the rifles.

GREAT point! Well said!

The right to protect your life ❤️

Love, LOVE your short and to the point argument with extremely relevant information .

A law needs to be passed that automatically provides funding to individuals bringing lawsuits against state governments and representatives that enact laws and statutes that violate any of the rights established via the Bill of Rights. States like California, where it is a felony to be in possession of nunchakus, need to be hit with major, costly class-action lawsuits for their heedless trampling of individual rights.

@readegloeckner6532

10 ай бұрын

So the attorney makes the money not the citizens.

@Sorchia56

10 ай бұрын

Absolutely!

@Sorchia56

10 ай бұрын

@@readegloeckner6532. If they are good enough and take the cases, they won’t make much if they do charge. I know many attorneys who would do this for free. It’s their country and their rights as well.

@analogkid4557

10 ай бұрын

No. There should be trials from We The People and when convicted of treason, they should swing.

@bartholomewceremony6981

10 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/p5mNt9mcirmTnpM.htmlsi=81OiTl-2P2t7Vub6