Boeing KC-46 Tanker’s First Aerial Refueling

Ғылым және технология

The Boeing multi-purpose tanker, the KC-46A Pegasus, performed its first ever aerial refueling January 24th, 2016 on a U.S. Air Force F-16 fighter.

Пікірлер: 58

  • @1964American
    @1964American8 жыл бұрын

    I was a Boomer on a KC135 out of Niagara Air Base and it was the best job I ever had in my life! I wish I could have refueled on this baby! Best of luck to all you cats on this new tanker and God Speed!

  • @Chuck59ish
    @Chuck59ish7 жыл бұрын

    Good to see that it's got the pods for the drogue system too. So it can help the Navy when they need it.

  • @givmi_more_w9251
    @givmi_more_w92518 жыл бұрын

    It amazes me every time how they manage to latch onto the pipe. Very nice flying.

  • @carlsisco6224
    @carlsisco62248 жыл бұрын

    CMSGT Sean Martin is the perfect person to lead the Air Refueling Operator team. I thoroughly enjoyed flying with him, while we were members of the 77th air Refueling Squadron at Seymour Johnson AFB, NC. I could only wish to have had the career he's had. Keep up the good work and I'm looking forward to the KC-46 going to Seymour HOPEFULLY!Carl Sisco, TSgt USAFR Retired

  • @chickenpax1
    @chickenpax18 жыл бұрын

    Awesome video! The importance of tanker has never been so great. Congrats to all that were involved in building this plane :D

  • @UfoDan100
    @UfoDan1007 жыл бұрын

    Makes me feel warm and fuzzy.

  • @charlesharwood5705
    @charlesharwood57058 жыл бұрын

    Can't wait to see these at Macdill AFB!

  • @trinab9612
    @trinab96128 жыл бұрын

    the boom looks just like the one McDonnell Douglas designed for the KC-10. It is a much better boom than Boeing made for the '135.

  • @juanturcios9535
    @juanturcios95358 жыл бұрын

    Es impresionante.

  • @joaobranco1063
    @joaobranco10638 жыл бұрын

    Good job!

  • @avidhbavkar5020
    @avidhbavkar50208 жыл бұрын

    When the boom is stowed, does the APU exhaust heat up the boom?

  • @pedromartinelli9148
    @pedromartinelli91487 жыл бұрын

    It must be modified the long tail fin into a twin tail fin. More flight stability, less weigh.

  • @regispotasio4657
    @regispotasio46578 жыл бұрын

    Perfector

  • @PatrickLipsinic
    @PatrickLipsinic8 жыл бұрын

    can't wait to see it at it's depot home at Tinker AFB.

  • @marliyasabur2066

    @marliyasabur2066

    8 жыл бұрын

    bangsonladesh

  • @VideosOmp
    @VideosOmp8 жыл бұрын

    wow...

  • @sankusrinivasrao5106
    @sankusrinivasrao51068 жыл бұрын

    good

  • @jonathan_careless
    @jonathan_careless8 жыл бұрын

    Very exciting. What's this plane based on? Is this a 767 variant?

  • @hitssquad

    @hitssquad

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Jonathan Careless Yes.

  • @PatrickLipsinic

    @PatrickLipsinic

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Jonathan Careless yes

  • @zirwaasif7539

    @zirwaasif7539

    8 жыл бұрын

    iiii78

  • @PatrickLipsinic

    @PatrickLipsinic

    8 жыл бұрын

    AIMM M english?

  • @zigwigss
    @zigwigss8 жыл бұрын

    I've been in a tanker before at an airshow very spacy

  • @smogchecker22

    @smogchecker22

    8 жыл бұрын

    54

  • @12th.jahlil
    @12th.jahlil8 жыл бұрын

    30,000 views, but no one commented anything, ok... Ok... OK

  • @aidanbui1616
    @aidanbui16168 жыл бұрын

    Cai luong

  • @b1aflatoxin
    @b1aflatoxin8 жыл бұрын

    The Justice League will take 2 please.

  • @spinster4000
    @spinster40008 жыл бұрын

    Boeing 767-200 tanker that's all it is xD

  • @Repented008

    @Repented008

    8 жыл бұрын

    +TheAirplaneDude 777 is next. Lol!

  • @sometimesboyzdrlaura4286
    @sometimesboyzdrlaura42868 жыл бұрын

    f15 f22

  • @searchbarwebs
    @searchbarwebs8 жыл бұрын

    nothing new

  • @rahilkapoor9487
    @rahilkapoor94878 жыл бұрын

    picture

  • @DeckedSwift
    @DeckedSwift8 жыл бұрын

    How come there are no comments on this video. :O

  • @jeanconfident8078

    @jeanconfident8078

    8 жыл бұрын

    miziciehaiti. troupicamar

  • @marliyasabur2066

    @marliyasabur2066

    8 жыл бұрын

    Bangladesh so

  • @fidedeleon7553

    @fidedeleon7553

    8 жыл бұрын

    No me interesa 5+Jean Confident

  • @tantofaz9511
    @tantofaz95118 жыл бұрын

    Embraer brazilian air craft

  • @jviation737
    @jviation7378 жыл бұрын

    4 Hours ago! Woa! I'm first AGAIN! Great job Boeing

  • @ondangnguyen2179
    @ondangnguyen21797 жыл бұрын

    Vu the toan

  • @kyleb7435
    @kyleb74358 жыл бұрын

    What happens if the f 16 are doing an air strike on Isis and need fuel but Isis then shoots the tanker down?

  • @hitssquad

    @hitssquad

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Kyle The Pro The tankers only fly in controlled airspace. There's no danger of them being shot down.

  • @deltaboy2011

    @deltaboy2011

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Kyle The Pro Replace with another.

  • @deltaboy2011

    @deltaboy2011

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Kyle The Pro We have hundreds of tankers.

  • @dt24

    @dt24

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Kyle The Pro the tankers don't fly directly over combat zones. They do circles out in the safety of controlled airspace and the fighters/bombers fly back and forth between them.

  • @robertlembo
    @robertlembo7 жыл бұрын

    A dark gray military plane full of fuel and without any windows, where have I seen that before...........

  • @handsomefingers
    @handsomefingers8 жыл бұрын

    What is so special about this aerial refueling?

  • @shrf

    @shrf

    8 жыл бұрын

    Well, when a passenger plane RUNS OUT OF FUEL, that will Really.REALLY.Help

  • @that_llama_in_a_tuxedo4584

    @that_llama_in_a_tuxedo4584

    8 жыл бұрын

    +LightningGamer123 passenger planes can't do aerial refuelling...

  • @that_llama_in_a_tuxedo4584

    @that_llama_in_a_tuxedo4584

    8 жыл бұрын

    This is the first aerial refuelling for this type of aircraft.

  • @nicolasoberholz5050
    @nicolasoberholz50508 жыл бұрын

    Le

  • @johnbender7082
    @johnbender70828 жыл бұрын

    They should have used the new 787 as the new American tanker. Makes no sense to use the older and less efficient 767.

  • @that_llama_in_a_tuxedo4584

    @that_llama_in_a_tuxedo4584

    8 жыл бұрын

    It does. The 767 is not in production so they don't have to make a whole new production line or make a 767 shell and move it to be fitted to military specs. The 787 still has a 7+ year back log so you don't want to make a production line for the same plane but military spec or take planes off the airliner line so you can get rid of that backlog.

  • @overcastandhaze
    @overcastandhaze7 жыл бұрын

    Yay...in the loosest form of the word.

  • @cropit1765
    @cropit17658 жыл бұрын

    תןםחוו

  • @lmftrips7900
    @lmftrips79008 жыл бұрын

    First

  • @vegass04
    @vegass048 жыл бұрын

    Oupty doo. After billions of dollars spent they managed to pump gas through the pipe from a converted airliner, over budget and behind schedule. I'm not impressed. And these guys wanted the LRSB project based on their cost management. LOL...

  • @that_llama_in_a_tuxedo4584

    @that_llama_in_a_tuxedo4584

    8 жыл бұрын

    Why don't you go ahead and retrofit a airliner to military specs which are much higher than civilian specs, which are changing a lot, while managing a multi billion dollar company. Good luck with that

  • @vegass04

    @vegass04

    8 жыл бұрын

    The_Communist_ Texan I am not a multi billion mega company with dozens of years of experience and money. They were over budget for fairly simple design, and they hopped to get LRSB contract based on "cost cutting".. Buhaha

Келесі