It is just these priorities that Arri have always focused on that has made their cameras the reference standard of the film industry. I normally work in broadcast but a few years ago the BBC came to Sweden to film a special Gothia Cup edition of their long running Jamie Johnson drama show. We used four Arrri Alexa minis but what shocked me was that everything was shot at 1080P and ProRes 422 (not even HQ). However, it was four days of shooting and hours of footage from each camera everyday with a DTI backing up as we shot. This shows that in the real world of production even when using the best gear, compromises are made to gain the final result. With this new Arri 35 camera they obviously know what the industry (outside of KZread) needs and based their decision to create a camera with the best image being more important to those customers over that of pure resolution!🙏🏾

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

What a great comment! And so true! I also filmed a project for Swedish television and it all was in 1080p. And it looked great!

I love this decision they made. smaller resolution also means smaller file size and less useless information we don't need that takes up storage space

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

Thats very true!!!

Hearing interviews with the top cinematographers I would say your interpretation of spot on. Image quality trumps resolution. I remember an interview with Roger Deakins on the film 1917 speaking on this very issue.

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

yes, thats very true, resolution doesnt matter as much once you hit 4k =)

@notsorandumusername

Жыл бұрын

@@ArberBaqaj Mark Toia seems to think differently, though kzread.info/dash/bejne/kYujtrxmdNHSnbA.html

Image sharpness has nothing to do with 8k 6k 12k or 4k. it's the lenses you place in front of the sensor that's makes it sharp or soft.

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

Well it goes in tandem I would say, If you have a sharp lens but you are shooting in 720p the image won't be to sharp, but you are right! you need both the lens IQ and hi Rez from a sensor, thanx for the comment!

I can understand the resolution part. But why not a full frame? It bringa another astetic to the picture.

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

yes thats an interesting point , Ive seen interviews where they have seen that its not poosible today to make a sensor full frame with the same specs this one have.

we love you too ! hahaha the people who watched until the end would get it

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

ha ha ha! they will! =)

Interesting aspect of the ingoing xK-race. 👍✨ Having shot video on Sony a7smk1-3, FS5 and (recently) FX6 since 2015 I could not agree more. Arri is a bit out of bounds for me personaly but the rational seem sound. It’s really about color science and a lot of other things - not about winning the xK-race.

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

HI! hope all is well! I feel that exakt same way!

Great insight, as usual. Definitely think color science is more important than resolution.

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

Yes i really think so =)

4.6k is more than enough. other manufacturers should also focus on better dynamic range and colors.

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

For most thing Im with you =)

I like the ARRI ways doing things.

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

£ #metoo =)

I intend to purchase the Sony A74 and use it as my own Arri Alexa 35mm

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

I have also done that =)

'Arri telling us what's important' - this alone qualifies the position you adopt. Arri's use case and indeed business model means they gravitate toward a particular approach, but it remains one approach not the only one and it would be terrible if other manufacturers regarded pursuing any other objective as 'dumb'.

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

I understand what your are saying, but when Arri the camera manucaturer that is leading in its feild goes its route it says alot.

This is a very good idea, though the old 35mm lenses will still vignette a little on that sensor, so wide framing and then cropping in post might be required. Essentially the jury is out until we see real-life images from this camera. I don't like the images they have used as demonstration so far, but demo images always look a bit artificial to me.

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

You are so right!! 🤟

I always preferred the Pocket 4k over the Pocket 6k because I feel the 6k is too sharp. I feel the GH5 was too sharp so I sold mine, I feel the S5 is too sharp for cinema but great for many things like music videos and other things. I feel your video here it’s too sharp for cinema with this Sony camera😆 The separation from the background is very distracting, I’m just being honest, the frame needs to be cohesive. If I just need to see just you, that what head shots are for. How you look it this video, your are sooooo sharp, it looks like you are in front of a green screen and aren’t really where you are. It doesn’t look like you’re really there. Sorry it doesn’t look natural, it’s too dang sharp! I know people are going to argue because they want to defend their purchases🤷🏽‍♂️ IDC. I have a Pocket 4k and never cared to play the resolution game. People always say “I want to reframe”😆 so you’re going to reframe everything you shoot😆 ok have fun with that, I render on 1080 i reframe too😀

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

Im with you on that its not great when iages are to sharp. I also love the pocket 4k. it is good to have though in post =)

Well, edit options from 8K are very useful and REDUCE PRODUCTION COSTS! Aero has a fan base. This is not logical.

@friedrichrengah4747

2 жыл бұрын

That‘s not completely true though, it can reduce production costs for things like reshoots or reframing, if you don‘t plan properly. If you plan properly, 4.5k is enough to deliver a superb end product. I work in the post production as well as in pre production and production and yes, you have more options in the post, but shooting in higher resolution does not actually reduce costs. You need more storage to keep all the data, you have to have more processing power to work with such material and it can make shooting more difficult. The pixels are so small on the physical sensor, that in some circumstances more light is required, but also things like grain look different because of that. Good preparation for a shoot is always better than that.

@Jorge_Ambruster

2 жыл бұрын

@@friedrichrengah4747 Digital noise isn't grain. Just wanted to point that out. But that's right, higher resolution sensors produce weird noise patterns.

@friedrichrengah4747

2 жыл бұрын

@@Jorge_Ambruster Yes, thats true, my mistake of simplification. Thanks for pointing out :)

@ArberBaqaj

Жыл бұрын

you make great points guys =)