Thanks to The Coldest Water for sponsoring this video: Coldest Giveaway: thecoldestwater.lpages.co/1-gallon-giveaway-coneofarc/ Shop The Coldest Water: thecoldestwater.com/?ref=coneofarc Use Promo Code " CONE" to get 10% OFF your entire order.

@Ent1610

3 жыл бұрын

Hey cone, please do the T34 Heavy tank next

@kommandantgalileo

3 жыл бұрын

what is better the Panzer 4 or the Tiger 1?

@huckfinn9860

3 жыл бұрын

Hey I just got a Panther tank Haynes enthusiast's manual for Christmas!

@calindanielbelibou6137

3 жыл бұрын

What about maus?

@seraphwithatank6535

3 жыл бұрын

nice sponsor.

Fiction: King tiger killer Reality: Both tanks break down 100 km from each other

@kloschuessel773

3 жыл бұрын

Mission accomplished

@tugalord

3 жыл бұрын

America still wins bc P47 thunderbolt Shitty edit:[REDACTED][DATA EXPUNGED]

@bigmeme8464

3 жыл бұрын

@@tugalord yes

@commandernonna6478

3 жыл бұрын

@@tugalord ok Americanaboo

@Trve_Kvlt

3 жыл бұрын

@@commandernonna6478 Ok Wehraboo

I appreciate the link. Thank you.

@ConeOfArc

3 жыл бұрын

You covered alot more of the minor details than I got to in my video so I knew anyone interested in the subject should check out that video as well.

@cheesedrgn

3 жыл бұрын

Hi

@Nightwing690

3 жыл бұрын

When are getting more Chieftains hatch videos? We haven't gotten a KV-2, Tiger 2, JagdTiger, Stug, FV4005 or Tortoise videos.

@wendigo5142

2 жыл бұрын

*tank you

@prathyushareddy9404

2 жыл бұрын

Ah yes the God of tanks related things

"The 90mm M3 ain't enough to beat the Kingtiger!" "Mount the T51E1 on the T26E1." "The gun makes the tank lean forward and it's hard to elevate it!" "Add counterweights and springs on the turret." "The long shells are difficult to load!" "Mount the T15E2 with two piece ammo on the T26E3." (Still sends the one with the T15E1) "We don't want to loose the tank during testing!" "Add some extra armour made out of our equipment and a Panther." "The extra armour makes the tank lean forward!" "Add more counterweights on the turret." "We don't have the gun sight for the cannon!" "Just use the M71C from the 90mm M3 cannon." "It doesn't match with the ballistics of the T15E1!" "Work out a range sheet." (Inspired from Potential History's video about the Firefly development)

@Fish-kz8xw

3 жыл бұрын

sir 17 pounder wont fit! *PUT IT IN SIDEWAYS*

@catstopower

3 жыл бұрын

the radio won't fit *CUT A HOLE AND HAVE IT STICK OUT THE BACK*

@aleky98

3 жыл бұрын

the engine's no good *GET FIVE CAR ENGINES AND PUT THEM TOGHETER*

@Bruhsound4.0

3 жыл бұрын

@@aleky98 Sir! let's just buy some american tanks! *NO, WE MAKE OUR OWN STUFF*

@jamesharding3459

3 жыл бұрын

Now I want this in what I imagine Patton’s and some random tanker’s voices to be.

King Tiger: What the hell are you? SPershing: I’m you, but American.

@Mister_Clean

3 жыл бұрын

*Suspension breaks**

@wanderingman50

3 жыл бұрын

@@MaliqIbrahim-1306 *laughs in 90mm*

@jamesharding3459

3 жыл бұрын

@@MaliqIbrahim-1306 Big gun, thick armor, slow, unreliable.

@tugalord

3 жыл бұрын

@@MaliqIbrahim-1306 dick move

@jamesharding3459

3 жыл бұрын

@Co S The majority of the criticisms I have seen leveled at T26 regard it's underpowered engine and inferior mobility. Are all of these incorrect?

“Could penetrate a panthers from 2600 meters” Warthunder: I’m just gonna ignore that

@justinkedgetor5949

3 жыл бұрын

Germany suffers

@memo57708

3 жыл бұрын

Idk about you but *if you can actually land the damn shot* The APCR shells will rip a fucking panther in half at any range

@lector-dogmatixsicarii1537

3 жыл бұрын

Panther hit by T33 shot at 900m in reality: [clean hole] "Where did the crew go?" *hand gestures* "POOF it is gone. MAGIC" Panther gets a point blank sack tap from the T15E2 T13 shot: *PING* "tHaT oNe BoUnCeD."

@matthewsay3756

3 жыл бұрын

@@lector-dogmatixsicarii1537 it’s been a problem since forever , if you look at the WT forums the first thing to pop up about the penetration is from 2017 and it still hasn’t been fixed

@lector-dogmatixsicarii1537

3 жыл бұрын

@@matthewsay3756 Because Germany Suffers, don't ya know? We fix the problems then what is the point of playing the game. You already have a game that can do lots of stuff. Why not give everybody a free Skink tank?

I remember when I first joined WT, when I got to tier 3, I saw the super pershing, and was like "gimme dat"

@tugalord

3 жыл бұрын

One of my favourite 6.3 heavys

@skilllost9584

3 жыл бұрын

when my T-34 85 meet super pershing for first time i panic and shoot nothing happen to the tank i knew i was doom but after being killed by super pershing my IS-2 cook it and i don't want to see T26E1 again

@omniyeet8818

3 жыл бұрын

@@tugalord But the repair cost is stupidly high lmao

@seabasso6849

3 жыл бұрын

@@omniyeet8818 lorraine 40t wants to know your location

@tugalord

3 жыл бұрын

@@omniyeet8818 yep One of my biggest issues with it as well as uptiers to 7.3 Idk why the repair cost is that high it's not like is broken and needs that to balance it, I actually stopped playing it because every time I play it I get bankrupt

trust me some years later this thing will be in the Nat geo or Historical channel

@potatojuice5124

3 жыл бұрын

This along with mark Felton

@tylerwenks1063

3 жыл бұрын

No that will be saved for conspiracy theories like “Hitler’s still alive” or “aliens built the pyramids” or “NASA is hiding alien bodies from the 60’s”

@kayagorzan

3 жыл бұрын

Imagine David Attenborough voicing this

@kh2b573

3 жыл бұрын

@@kayagorzan nah our boi be voicing it

@kayagorzan

3 жыл бұрын

@@kh2b573 aight man, we'll have Dave as a guest instead?

I actually volunteered and interned at the First Division Museum and I walked past the last Super Pershing almost every day. It’s a neat tank and I actually did a presentation to the public about it.

@frankpolly

3 жыл бұрын

is the tank still open or did they seal off all the hatches completely?

@dominicvucic8654

2 жыл бұрын

So out of the 2 that were built one exist wow that's impressive

@Legiondude

Жыл бұрын

​@@dominicvucic8654 There were some amount north of 20 T26E4's built IIRC

@dominicvucic8654

Жыл бұрын

@@Legiondude still impressive there other vehicles of low production that cease to exist

@JohnJohnson-yl9of

8 ай бұрын

I love cantigny and visited there every time I had the opportunity when I’d go see my grandparents in Chicago, I got to try on uniforms and helmets from the first infantry from ww1 up through Vietnam when I was maybe 7 it was a really nice experience as a young kid the vets were really nice and that place definitely inspired me a lot to start collecting

Super Pershing: Where's my ammo. Supply Sgt: I traded it for beer and a Dutch smut mag. You don't really need that do you? Super Pershing: Erm...

@rjscott6116

3 жыл бұрын

What on earth are you talking about?

@TheEpicNoob

4 ай бұрын

@@rjscott6116the ammo never made it to the super pershings

That moment when you realise not a single king tiger was destroyed frontaly during ww2 and most were self destructed after running out of ammo and fuel

@thecanadiankiwibirb4512

3 жыл бұрын

Or got their cheeks clapped like at Lvov

@r.j.dunnill1465

3 жыл бұрын

A number of them were disabled, even if by side hits or spalling (or in the case of one currently on display at La Gleize, the gun barrel being partially blown off).

@packardexelence

2 жыл бұрын

& THEY WERE A BIT TOO HEAVY FOR THEIR MAYBACH ENGINES; CAUSEING PREMAURE BREAKDOWNS!!!!!!!!

@Attaxalotl

2 жыл бұрын

wait WHAT

@pittbrat7963

2 жыл бұрын

a lot of them were "killed" or "disabled" (call it what you will) by troops from a short distance who took out vital parts like tracks,etc... and in a city environment(stupid German tactics!) where tanks are useless.

Definitely American. "We need more armor!" *welds a bunch of scrap metal on an old tank* "Here ya go. Need anything else?"

@altair458

3 жыл бұрын

At least they had a tank to save englands sorry tea drinking ass. If not for America and Russia they would be speaking German in parliament today. 🖕🇬🇧 god shave the queenie🖕england

@l337pwnage

3 жыл бұрын

@@altair458 That's a boomerific post.

@TornadoADV

3 жыл бұрын

I mean, german armor steel was getting pretty bad towards the end of the war, but I wouldn't go so far as to insult it as calling it "scrap". :(

@wellshit9489

3 жыл бұрын

@@altair458 mostly Russia though. Easy to act strong when you aren't getting bombed by the Germans.

@thepurplefistoffury5350

3 жыл бұрын

@@altair458 at least we didnt win by acts of terrorism against japan

*American sees a Panther Tank* Pershing: King Tiger Panther: Do I really look that fat ?

@frisho2190

3 жыл бұрын

Well 140kg chick vs 160kg chick not that big difference

@lordseelenfresserdemonking1168

3 жыл бұрын

Me: panther your not fat , your perfect just the way you are

@ln7929

3 жыл бұрын

You not fat panther your just a big boned medium tank that weights more than some heavy tanks

@frisho2190

3 жыл бұрын

@@lordseelenfresserdemonking1168 panther is like obese person it also died prematurely because of insides failure. (For obese people heart for panther final drive)

@robertharris6092

3 жыл бұрын

To be fair theyre both the same chassis. And if youre a km away its be hard to distinguish.

When will we see that arl44 prototype thats in the intro?

@startingbark0356

3 жыл бұрын

Its an FCM F1

@lowryder3209

3 жыл бұрын

@@startingbark0356 oo cool ill look it up

me drinking from coldest water bottle MMMMMM THATS GOOD!!!!! me drinking from regular water bottle ☠☠☠

@bernardberben4852

3 жыл бұрын

Random but yes I agree

@MaliqIbrahim-1306

3 жыл бұрын

Warm water = uh... well... not good?

@11Survivor

3 жыл бұрын

Uh, use a fridge?...

@softdrink-0

2 жыл бұрын

Shill 😆

@mountainguyed67

2 жыл бұрын

Put it in the freezer until there’s some ice in it, awesome!

Such a shame the SuperPersh that saw action wasn't preserved. A real shame.

@prehistoricallydisabled

3 жыл бұрын

ikr, they scrapped it but would have been so sick to see it in a museum or in running condition at Bovington.

@kireta21

3 жыл бұрын

"Hey Mike, they say we can keep only one, which is it going to be?" "Obviously not the one with busted suspension!" Or something along these lines

@billwilson3609

2 жыл бұрын

It was knocked out after a Panzer IV put a 75mm round thru the side of the hull. The Army didn't want the M26 in the first place so wasn't thrilled when they were sent the single Super Pershing to try out. That's why the Army allowed Belton Cooper to screw it up by adding un-needed additional armor. The M26 was limited to slow speeds to avoid screwing up it's automatic transmission so Cooper's added armor reduced it's speed to a crawl. It crawled around for two weeks where it hit two unknown distant targets before being knocked out by a medium tank in April. The war was close to ending so It got hauled off to a armor junkyard to await the cutting torches.

@whyyoumadbro2370

2 жыл бұрын

@@billwilson3609 Why didn't they like it though?

@billwilson3609

2 жыл бұрын

@@whyyoumadbro2370 The US Army had the M6 heavy tank in 1942 but decided they didn't need one for the type of fighting they planned to do. Ordnance began designing a replacement for the M4 in 1942 and had the T25 heavy medium ready for testing in 1943. Congress was worried about being re-elected in 1944 due to the Press having the voters worked up over the German Tigers and Panthers so ordered the T25 to be converted into a heavy tank and in battle before the 1944 Fall elections. There were delays so the M26 didn't start being assembled until November of '44 with Congress ordering the first 20 made to be shipped to Europe ASAP. There were more delays so the first 20 arrived in Antwerp in February of 1945 where the Army refused to use them since none had been tested nor came with trained crews, mechanics or spare parts. The Armor commanders relented in March to get Ike out of hot water and accepted two each to try out. They found them to be too slow to keep up with advancing units, required a barge to be taken across rivers and had frequent mechanical problems. The Super Pershing weighed even more so most commanders figured it would spend most of it's time being repaired due to trying to keep up with the now rapidly advancing units.

Never did fight a King Tiger, when they find that what they thought was a King Tiger was a Panzer IV

@driller7714

3 жыл бұрын

If the turret-less tank in the pic is the one it knocked out, that is indeed a king tiger. Center mounted light, fenders are completely different than any panther, running gear is also different. Furthermore, I can see mistaking a panther for a king tiger but a panzer IV? No sloped armor and looks nothing like a tiger II. More likely mistaken with a tiger I. (Panther Gs did get fitted with late style steel wheels but the tracks did not extend beyond the sponsons and there were no fenders. Rather Schürzen, spaced armor plates were hung from the sides.)

@MarshFlyFightWin

3 жыл бұрын

@@driller7714 Though the pictured is of a destroyed King Tiger, it isn't the one it's said to have "destroyed". As that's a picture of King Tiger knocked out in the battle of the bulge, and the supposed one it knocked out was climbing a pile of rubble when the tank was knocked out. Not on the side of the road.

@justinkedgetor5949

3 жыл бұрын

It could have just been a mistake in the heat of the moment. I dont see it as a big deal

@KorianHUN

3 жыл бұрын

Imagine being a panzer IV at the end of the war and seeing this monstrosity made out of half a panther and tons of boilerplate, with random shit added to it towering over you with a massively overpowered gun... yeah, that Panzer IV got fucking vaporized.

@stackertheeod7566

3 жыл бұрын

@@KorianHUN I fucking cackled

I have seen that Super Pershing at the 1st Division Museum, and even got to climb onto the turret. It was a really cool experience.

@h.cedric8157

3 жыл бұрын

I made a custom RC Model of it.

Additional note: Don't forget the ammo! To my knowledge, the only anti-tank ammo that was available for the 90mm gun prior to the end of WWII (and possibly for some time after), was the T33 E'X', where the 'X' stands for one of several modification versions of the projectile. I have an E4 with the powder cartridge empty and it is one of the single-piece designs. The "T" designation shows that it was still an EXPERIMENTAL projectile not yet introduced into the standard Army inventory -- I am not sure this design ever was. The projectile weighs about 43 pounds and is crimped to the huge projectile cartridge at the projectile's base just below the single copper driving band. This projectile is an "AP Shot" projectile with no streamlined windscreen or hardened AP cap on its nose and the nose was a rather blunt-point "Secant Ogive" design (has a somewhat more conical, less curved shape than the more-typical Tangent Ogive nose where the nose merges smoothly with the cylindrical body); the S-O shape having a beveled crease where it joined the lower body. This nose allowed a reasonably good penetration by "wedging" action against thick armor a near-right-angles impact (up to circa-30 degrees from right-angles as zero), but was blunt enough to dig its lower edge ("chin") into such a thick plate at higher impact angles over 45 degrees such as the sloped upper hull of a PANTHER or TIGER II or their up-gunned, turretless, tank-destroyer variants. Many of the earlier US anti-tank projectiles in WWII had AP caps to keep the nose from shattering on impact at moderate (30-45-degrees) against ductile armor like US tanks used and against the face-hardened armor used by many German tanks, both as their main armor or as uparmored over-layers at all angles up to 45 degrees or so. This projectile seems to have been made tough enough not to fail under these conditions. As the fronts of German tanks became more sloped and streamlined to increase glancing as a major form of protection improvement, the caps actually started to cause REDUCED penetration, since they flattened out and were broken up on the plate face, reducing the weight of the shell as it tried to go deeper into the armor. Also, it was found that projectile nose breakage at high obliquity where glancing was the most important means of increasing protection, actually INCREASED penetration due to the broken nose pieces ricocheting away no longer affecting the rest of the projectile at all, so it just kept digging into the armor at the original spot with bad effects on the armor. Note also that this new shell was AP Shot, with a solid core increasing its weight and strength, since the older capped shells had an internal cavity for an explosive. Explosives may make the shell do more damage if they penetrate, but the hollow space inside the projectile most decidedly makes the projectile body lighter and weaker, most especially when hitting at an oblique angle, which in many cases made them of minimal effectiveness (all or nothing seems to have been the rule and AP Shot does that as well as or even better than an AP shell does if it penetrates).

@r.j.dunnill1465

3 жыл бұрын

The T designation was retained for some reason, even though the projectile was the standard AP round into the 1950s. T33 did have a 'ballistic cap' windscreen, but no cap. Besides the T33, the M3 was furnished with M82 APCBC and T30E16 APCR.

what i want to make in sprocket: 0:30 where i give up: 0:52

Germany: We have a team of professional engineers prepared to draft and design the ultimate armored vehicle. USA: *Monster Garage Theme intensifies*

@user-dd8vo7or2d

3 жыл бұрын

*Pimp my ride*

@tremedar

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-dd8vo7or2d Yo, I heard you like armor....

"Jesus! It's a god*mn Tiger!" Every American tanker in ww2

@k-874

3 жыл бұрын

British Crews: "Huh, shocker..." "Yes... That really is unfortunate, considering how few we're actually made..."

@chadjustice8560

3 жыл бұрын

Not really because they only have 3 recorded encounters with tiger 1 and sherman's beat them every time only the pershing lost

@troutwarrior6735

3 жыл бұрын

@@k-874 I see someone has been watching some squire! Yessssssss. . .

@Del_S

3 жыл бұрын

@@chadjustice8560 I think he's more joking about the fact that every single model of German tank and most self-propelled guns got reported as a Tiger at some point or another by troops who hadn't paid attention to any tank recognition cards they'd been shown. If they'd been shown any in the first place.

@k-874

3 жыл бұрын

@@troutwarrior6735 I wasn't expecting anyone to understand the reference but this is a surprise to be sure and a welcome one!

When you see this tank from the side: lóóóóóóóóóng

Me: *Gets killed in Tiger by Super Pershing* Me taking Stuka for revenge kill: REEEEEEEEEEE

@Ohnothetowers

3 жыл бұрын

Im asuming ur talking ahout war thunder

@nickc.g5301

3 жыл бұрын

@@MaliqIbrahim-1306 *Spawns in 109 G-10: Hello

@lonelyguy688

3 жыл бұрын

@@nickc.g5301 spawns in P-51D mustang:So u have chosen death?

@judahboyd2107

3 жыл бұрын

@@MaliqIbrahim-1306 This is how German 5.7 feels. Your cas has no dogfighting capabilities.

@nickc.g5301

3 жыл бұрын

@@lonelyguy688 *Laughs even harder*

Got both the T26E1-1 and M26E1 in war thunder, love them both! Nice to know that the faster reload on the M26E1 actually makes some sense with the redesigned ammo and gun it got.

Now that you've done the Super Pershing, can you please do the M103?

Wasn't death traps the book that popularized the wrong idea of shermans being the well.... Death traps?

@monticore1626

3 жыл бұрын

Yes it is, if shermans were death traps then their crew survival rates would show it

@frisho2190

3 жыл бұрын

@@monticore1626 yea how low was death rate ? 2 or 3%?

@kaymarx9677

3 жыл бұрын

@DAS ist gut So not really special one way or the other? (Until the upgrades, I mean.)

@Vlad_-_-_

3 жыл бұрын

@DAS ist gut It was on par with all the other tanks to begin with, with the wet stowage and large escape hatches it becamse statistically the most survivable tank of the war. Statistically, the safest place to be in WW2, was in a Sherman.

@frisho2190

3 жыл бұрын

@DAS ist gut I know yet that still doesn't make it death trap. Because then every tank can be considered death trap and tank crews hade on of best survival rates ~3% death rate.

Meanwhile in US tank development office: Designer: "Hey these German big cats are getting out of hand" Engineer: "Hmmm, remember the time we put an M4 on steroids?" Designer: "Yeah when we made the Jumbo?" Engineer: "Yeah! Why don't we just do the same thing with our new M26 Pershings?!" Designer: "Carl you're a freaking genius!" *(SUPER PERSHING INTENSIFIES)*

@kh2b573

3 жыл бұрын

M26*

@marquez4204

3 жыл бұрын

@@kh2b573 Crap I mixed up the numbers

@prehistoricallydisabled

3 жыл бұрын

That’s actually how they got the idea for the T32 Heavy Tank. The Super Pershing on the other hand got its ‘super’ name from being simply an up gunned 90mm T26E4 with the field modifications of adding steel boiler plates and extra turret armour from a Panther tank’s plate.

used the m60 tank in vietnam with 90mm canaster VERY BIG shotgun, worked good in heavy jungle or out to 400- hunderd yards. the sheriands tank 120mm had not arrived yet in my div. i liked the 90mm HE. with a range of over 2600 yards 10th armor 4th div. 1969.

@gregbrown6793

Жыл бұрын

M48?

@bill5982

10 ай бұрын

The M60 never mounted a 90mm gun and the Sheridan had a 152mm.

@theonlylechuga

7 ай бұрын

what in the stolen valor are you talking about?

America's "King Tiger Killer" that never actually went up against a King Tiger.

@michaelbruce6190

3 жыл бұрын

And when it ran into a Nashorn, it got dead.

@WaukWarrior360

3 жыл бұрын

Supposedly never went up against a King Tiger

@WaukWarrior360

3 жыл бұрын

@@michaelbruce6190 While the Nashorne was in an ambush position and the Tiger 1 got taken out by an M4

@michaelbruce6190

3 жыл бұрын

@@WaukWarrior360 very true

@mystictomato9466

3 жыл бұрын

@@WaukWarrior360 A tiger 1 also knocked out a Pershing in a tank duel in 1945. 2 of the Pershing's crewmembers were killed, the rest of the crew bailed out safely.

I came across your channel by chance, and I am glad that I did, I am an aircraft fan for the most-part but I do occasionally take a trip into the world of armour, I think your narration and visuals are excellent, and thanks for another interesting and informative mini-documentary, may there be many many more to come. 😀👍🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

There is one other Super Pershing on display that I know of. It is at Camp Shelby’s Armed Forces Museum in Mississippi. It is on static display, and I have seen it multiple times.

You don’t steal parts from other equipment, it’s called “Controlled Substitution “ anything other than that is cannibalism and that’s a section eight discharge for the maintenance officer...

So you’re telling me in real life the cannon could go through a panthers upper plate at 2600 yards? In war thunder it can’t do it past 800, they really nerfed the crap out of that.

@jukosdainamikos4050

9 ай бұрын

no panther is only better reallive than a pershing ore super pershing ever can be....1Shot for every lategerman tank in real live

I find it funny this story popped up on my feed. My grandfather served in Spearhead 3rd armored div and was involved in that project. I remember he said they welded chunks of railroad rails to the back of the turret to try and balance the turret out. Because of the size of the shells many of the tank crews first thought it was a naval gun that had been mounted on a tank.

thanks for the video man, i cannot express enough how much i love the pershing

The good thing about these Pershing tank modifications is it paved the way for the Patton series tanks and eventually the M60 and M103.

There's many historians who speculate that a tiger 1 was actually on a train near the area that this happened, that could have been hastily used in a battle if someone were so inclined. Not a king tiger, but still, it's possible

Thank You for this! The Belton Cooper reference was awesome.

"Another River, Another Town: A Teenage Tank Gunner Comes of Age in Combat--1945" by John P. Irwin. Irwin, the gunner on the Super Pershing, recounts his actions in the battle for Dassau in his above mentioned book. He was in I Company 3/33 Armored Regiment. His encounter with the 'King Tiger' was in urban street conditions and at very close range. He was able to fire first striking the enemy tank but the 90mm round was deflected by the Tiger's frontal armor. This to me discounts any possibility of the German tank being mistaken for a Mark 4 as the Super Pershing's main gun would have easily taken it out at any angle. It's possible it was a Panther but again its sloped 80mm frontal armor at the range of this engagement should have been a fairly easy kill as well. Next, the 'King Tiger' fired but missed with its round being too high. The Tiger continued to move forward and as it did had to traverse an incline caused by street ruble. In doing so it exposed its belly to Irwin who fired again, striking the King Tiger in the gut which killed it instantly. Trusting German records found after the war to check their disposition and location of specific units is dubious at best. In the fog of war anything is possible and a King Tiger being in the battle for Dassau seems plausible to me. I trust the Super Pershing crew's recollections as to what transpired over any after actions reviews by personnel who were most likely not even evolved in the battle for Dassau. 3rd Armored Division Spearhead!

@chadjustice8560

2 жыл бұрын

So you don't trust the German reports that state no king tiger was with in 50-60 miles of there? It was a king tiger because none were even close.

@mcedd54

2 жыл бұрын

@@chadjustice8560 ; "So you don't trust the German reports that state no king tiger was with in 50-60 miles of there?" Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. At this point in the war the Germans had very few means to conduct the war let alone keep accurate track of it. I lived in Germany for five years in the 1980's, while serving as a tanker in the 3rd Armored Division, and discussed this very subject with quite a few German combat vets. To a man they relayed that whatever units they were assigned to were terribly supplied and disorganized even at company level. Every German soldier, sailor and airman was given a rifle and formed into emergency stop-gap units to delay the Brits, Canadians and Americans. Any running stray or repaired armored vehicles would have been commandeered by local commanders and placed into service. So yes, there is a good chance a Tiger II could have been in Dassau Chad. And yes, I believe John P. Irwin and his crewmates as well. So should you.

In all your videos during intro after you say "my name is cone of arc" I always think of "my name is Joan of arc." anyone else?

@giorgiogalliano05

3 жыл бұрын

Nope only you

@allankay12

3 жыл бұрын

@@giorgiogalliano05 shows my age now huh?

@Mr762308

3 жыл бұрын

allan kay Well hopefully cone of arc doesn't get burned at the stake like ole Joan did.

@allankay12

3 жыл бұрын

@@Mr762308 lol. That's funny

@combatantezoteric2965

3 жыл бұрын

What does his name even mean?

The 17lb that the Brits, Canadians and Poles were using in Firefly/Archer and stat AT had double the armour penetration of the long 88, when using SaBOT ammo. The 88 wasnt the end all.

@adriandumitrascu4292

8 ай бұрын

who needed sabot, long 88 with explosive filler penetrate everything ally had dealing massive damage inside the tank compared with sabot and apcr

Theres a Super Pershing in a scrap yard in North Africa. I saw it a few years ago when I was watching a video about to guys looking for a Sherman to restore

I love how the modified Super Pershing, it looks rugged but sleek at the same time

one might wonder how a Super Pershing reached Dessau, its because the long edge of the gun reached the town first before the whole tank

@mountainguyed67

2 жыл бұрын

Lol!

@80Loke

2 жыл бұрын

🤭

"king tiger killer" killed no king tigers also imagine if this thig was mass-produced and german tank anti-tank crews were just instructed to aim for the almost unarmored spring, thus making to gun go limp, that'd be hilarious

@aeromexico0015

3 жыл бұрын

Only a few where made how coot kill a tiger if only a few where made

@kvproductions2581

3 жыл бұрын

@@aeromexico0015 then it's not a king tiger killer that's like if i told you "hey bro, i'm a terrorist killer" and you said "but you haven't killed any terrorists" and i replied "Well there's only one of me and i've never met one"

@dhwwiiexpert

2 жыл бұрын

Never have I thought making a gun go flaccid would ever be a legitimate strategy.

@kvproductions2581

2 жыл бұрын

@@dhwwiiexpert tank erectile dysfunction

@alp7292

2 ай бұрын

​@@kvproductions2581sherman rammed a tiger II lol wehraboo

This earned my subscription. Well done!

Great video and thanks for the info that I've wondered about for quite a while.... the two tubes on the turret. Now I know :)

Soviet Union Tiger II killers : ISU 152 and IS2. But US Pershings and experimental heavy tanks are fascinating machines. Imagine a T30 with 150mm HE wrecking king tigers.

@fuckoff4705

3 жыл бұрын

i disagree, the t30 with a 150mm was an impractical tank, by that time the soviet union had the is3 which is just a better tank and more practical

@Vlad_-_-_

3 жыл бұрын

@@fuckoff4705 If they would polish out all the flaws and make it a reliable machine, it's gun would be devastating to even a Jtiger. But historically, I agree, the T30 was not deemed good for mass production for good reasons, same as T29, T34 or T32. My mistake, I should have pointed that out. The T30 was experimental, the Super Pershing was maybe in a similar situation I think.

@jbeverley67

3 жыл бұрын

@@fuckoff4705 that's saying alot cause the is3 was absolutely garbage

@Vlad_-_-_

3 жыл бұрын

@@jbeverley67 And of course you can prove this, because your biased opinion doesn't cut it.

@ConeOfArc

3 жыл бұрын

The is3 was indeed a fairly bad tank. It was unreliable and although the armor in theory was effective due to issues with the design it was considerably weaker than it should have been. It accomplished the goal of intimidation but removing any bias one way or another it was a flawed machine.

There was only 20 x Pershing used in WW2 and even less at 2 x Super Pershing used...Their value seems to be over estimated.

@DerpyDaringDitzyDoo

2 жыл бұрын

I disagree, at least with the Pershing. It didn't see much use in WW2, but it was critically important in the Korean War. And in every encounter it proved to be far superior to the T34/85 that the NKPA were using at the time. In fact it was so superior, the T34's were able to knock out 6 Pershings, but in return the Pershings knocked out 38 T34's. This was far superior to the performance of the Shermans, and the performance of the M46 Patton was horrible. The Pershing really was quite a good tank, unlike it's weirdly suped up Super Pershing Cousin that never really had any use haha.

@ku_rt3630

Жыл бұрын

tbh the Pershing tank is incredibly important at the battle of cologne, it killed a Panther that was sniping shermans, the only reason probably it wasnt mass produced is its expensive and cost too much recourses (i think)

That's cool.... in the opening shots with the tank rolling backwards, the machine gun mounted on top looks like a GIANT raven.

Such a BEAUTIFUL tank! Truly awesome!

Ive seen the one in Illinois! My grandpa would take me every year before covid happend

So how many TIger B's did the "Super Pershing" knock out. None. What a KILLER!

@r.j.dunnill1465

3 жыл бұрын

What wasn't discussed was how much more effective the projectiles would be against the Tiger B's plates than the M3 projectiles.

This is going to be a good one! Better yet, an amazing one!

Loved this beast!! Great video!!

How is it a king tiger killer if it never killed a king tiger?

@calessel3139

3 жыл бұрын

Shhhhhh!!! You're not supposed to point things like that out.

@aeromexico0015

3 жыл бұрын

It was ment to

First time time i seen this tank was the show greatest tank battles the fight was a tiger 2 vs m26 super pershing

@nevanramirez8287

3 жыл бұрын

"Battle of Germany"

Really loving this series!

I’ve seen the one at Cantigny, had no idea it was the only one left

When you've been on one before and didn't even realize it was the Super pershing :)

i can imagine historians thousands of years later saying that the duel between the Tiger ii and Super Pershing was a legend. 😂

I was in a M48 tank when I was in Vietnam in 1969. I once noted the date on a box of the 90 mm ammo, 1944.

@r.j.dunnill1465

3 жыл бұрын

Interesting that they made the M36/M41 backward compatible with the M3's ammunition, something the Chieftain pointed out with his piece on the M47.

I've been to the first division museum and saw the tank. The cool part about it is that you can climb up on the tanks. They have a wwii french lended tank and many others. Wish you could go inside them

Ayyy my favorite tank to play

@tugalord

3 жыл бұрын

Mine too All round good frontal armour and great gun, also reverse speed is very handy when that damm gun barrel or elevation mechanism breaks for the millionth time

Sad thing the only Super Pershing never destroyed a King Tiger cause they found out it was a Panzer IV lul

@dunruden9720

3 жыл бұрын

nerver desrtoyed??

@xxmedalofhonorxx6744

3 жыл бұрын

@@dunruden9720 Thx for the correction

@soldiermark9059

3 жыл бұрын

@@xxmedalofhonorxx6744 umm plsss change your profile name

@xxmedalofhonorxx6744

3 жыл бұрын

@@soldiermark9059 Why sould I? Because i dont support American false reports?

@xxmedalofhonorxx6744

3 жыл бұрын

@@soldiermark9059 Maybe you should delete you whole Account or at least all of your scary bad quality videos

Obrigado pelas legendas, curtido e compartilhado.😁

That glacius plate with the "side wings" looks absolutely badass.

Yeah the Superpershing could have been very powerful we know that cause we welded some pieces of Panther armor plate on it somewhere in a garage in Europe lol

@shanechambers9529

3 жыл бұрын

its really about the gun mostly

@donaldhysa4836

3 жыл бұрын

@@shanechambers9529 I am sure they could have made better use of the gun that to strap in that awkward heavy tank contraption they came up with

3:34 Imagine if this was implemented into War Thunder; if you shoot the springs, the gun would not be able to elevate...

@MrPanzerCatYT

3 жыл бұрын

I think it was recently

Fabulous job! I will follow.

Excellent and interesting feature.....Keep up the good work......Peace from Ireland.

Hetzer would be a good tank to cover due to it being a tiny deathbox

@donaldhysa4836

3 жыл бұрын

How was it a tiny deathbox? Cause Lindybeige said so?

@crabbyjungle5670

3 жыл бұрын

How is it a tiny deathbox?

@donaldhysa4836

3 жыл бұрын

@@crabbyjungle5670 Cause Lindybeige said so pay attention

@Kyle-gw6qp

3 жыл бұрын

Lindybeige presented nothing but options in that video. He was completely wrong. The Hetzer was actually really effective.

@user-dd8vo7or2d

Жыл бұрын

@@Kyle-gw6qp No it was not. It was hastily designed and much of its systems were unreliable.

As an aside I've always doubted they used boiler plate. The thickness is the big clue the rolled hull M4 Sherman just so happens to have completely flat sides... 38mm thick. So they supposedly carved up a panther for the turret applique, but then just happened to find and use random boiler plate of the exact same thickness as the slab sides of an M4 Sherman to use on the front hull? It's seems even less probable because we know for a fact this exact sort of modification where the flat side armor of knocked out Sherman's was cut up and placed onto the front slope of others was one of the most common methods of creating 'field expedient' Jumbos. Given all the lies and other bullshit the man in question put in the aforementioned book he wrote I don't trust him all that much as a source.

@erwin669

2 жыл бұрын

When Cone mentioned Belton Cooper my first response "ugh that guy". If he would have said he salvaged the armor off a Sherman to up armor the Pershing it would have brought his "Sherman was a deathtrap" story into question. Why would you use "inferior" armor to protect the Pershing?

@billwilson3609

2 жыл бұрын

@@erwin669 Why did they even bother to up-armor the Pershing in the first place? Because Belton Cooper got to look at the other Pershings that were knocked out by 75mm and 88mm rounds. The Army didn't like the Pershing so didn't care if the Super Pershing saw combat as-is or up-armored. Cooper complained about the US tanks' thin armor thru out the war so they allowed him to add armor to the Super Pershing to shut him up. That tank was knocked out by a 75mm round that penetrated the side of the hull so was hauled to a scrap yard instead of being repaired.

@erwin669

2 жыл бұрын

@@billwilson3609 The first was a side shot from a Tiger at under 100 yards. The vehicle was recovered and repaired. A Pershing, from the 9th Armored, was disabled due to artillery fire, it was also recovered and repaired. The only Pershing that wasn’t able to be repaired was hit by a Nashorn at 300m, the crew survived. Cooper didn’t order the one Super Pershing to be upadmored; that was Major Harrington. And that appears to have been done before the normal Pershings saw combat. Cooper’s memoir should be taken with a huge grain of salt as it doesn’t mesh with data from other primary sources and is criticized by many historians. Being written 50 years after the fact doesn’t help it either.

@billwilson3609

2 жыл бұрын

@@erwin669 The first 20 M26's that came off the assembly line arrived in Antwerp in January without trained crews and mechanics. The Army refused to use them until February to get Ike out of hot water so those probably had crews and mechanics going thru a crash course over their operation and repair. The Super Pershing arrived in late March after the first 20 had been divided up amongst the armor units in February so those had seen limited action by then. The GI's didn't consider the M26 to be very useful since it had to travel at a low speed to prevent damage to the transmission so was kept at the end of advancing columns and called up when needed. They said it could take 20 to 30 minutes for one to arrive so the threat often had been dealt with by other means when it did. Major Harrington commanded the armor repair shops and Cooper was his liaison officer that delivered oral and written reports to the HQ brass. Cooper had been complaining for years about the thin armor on US tanks to anyone that would listen so HQ probably had enough of him and told Harrington to allow Cooper to up-armor the T26E4 to show him it was easier said than done. The Army didn't want the T26E4 either so didn't care if Cooper's added armor ruined the engine and transmission that already had problems moving the standard M26.

Finally I know what those big ole cylinders at the top of the turret were for.

I'm 3hours late but thank you soo much for making my request. Your videos are very professional and well doen.

Pls make a vid to the t44 medium tank from the soviets I wud me interest

T26 Pershing: * slowly rubbing tank hands on tigers engine * T26 Pershing: "I am coming for you tiger"

@tobiaszistler

3 жыл бұрын

-M24 Shoots- (Recusches of the front 150mm angled front plate ) King Tiger laughing and says : "I think you didnt heared the Boss Music Mr Pershing,,

Watching this while I play around with my custom made Super Pershing 1:16 RC tank

Great channel! You do an outstanding job!!!!

Using the sponsor to get over 10 minutes is youtube optimization

Weehrabos Malding In the comments

Great shot!

"Super Pershing vs King Tiger" Now that can be a good title for a Romantic movie with that "fight king to love a woman" rule.

Imagine thinking Sherman’s were death traps

Ah yes a balanced tier 8 premium medium tank

@tugalord

3 жыл бұрын

In Wt it's a researchable tier 4 Br:6.3

@cristobalalvarez5491

3 жыл бұрын

@@tugalord your stupid if you didn't get the joke

@gofergofrunio6281

3 жыл бұрын

WOT moment

@tugalord

3 жыл бұрын

@@cristobalalvarez5491 I got it in Wot its broken

Keep up the good work ! Very good !

Every couple years I go check out the Korean and E4 sitting at that park. It’s a nice walking area and number of tanks on display for people to enjoy.

Oh, youtube now has trailers.

Had WWII prolonged a bit past 1945, we might see more clashes between the American Pershing vs. the German King Tiger. We might even see the Germans introduce that prototype: Lowe Tank (aka. Lion Tank, the evolved form of the King Tiger). Of course, maybe even the Maus tank too.

@norwegian_noisemaker6737

2 жыл бұрын

Don’t forget IS-3 and IS-4, T29, T30, T34, and of course the Centurion

@fiery_gamerz

2 жыл бұрын

@@norwegian_noisemaker6737 Maybe the IS7 too?

@norwegian_noisemaker6737

2 жыл бұрын

@@fiery_gamerz yeah

My first time here, man... Nicely done!

We have a nice T26E1 at the 45th museum in OKC. Its pretty cool!

Noooo it’s in 10 hours!

so… anti-anti tank

I absolutely love this series

Good video. Thanks.

No Tiger II was penetrated frontally during the whole WW2.

@aeromexico0015

3 жыл бұрын

Nah

Well how many Tigers did it kill?

@DarkMatterX1

3 жыл бұрын

632

@r.j.dunnill1465

3 жыл бұрын

It was designed to match the firepower of the KwK 43, even if it arrived too late for serious combat.

@hibiki9380

2 жыл бұрын

@@r.j.dunnill1465 it wasn't enough apparently, good thing the Germans was out of resources and flanked on many sides.

@r.j.dunnill1465

2 жыл бұрын

@@hibiki9380 Wasn't enough? Even the M3 (with M304 HVAP) could defeat all plates of the Tiger II, albeit the glacis only at dangerously close range.

@r.j.dunnill1465

2 жыл бұрын

@@hibiki9380 The problem of defeating, at long ranges, 150mm of RHA angled at 50 degrees would first be solved with HEAT and then with APFSDS.

Your intro is worth a spot on history channel

They are live in Illinois actually been there it was quite nice that purging was all rusty at the time though they repainted it went out after I left evedetly