No video
ALL THE 'DINOSAURS' OF THE MOVIE 65.
In this epic video, we will explore the somewhat controversial dinosaurs of the latest Blockbuster: 65. Young Adam Driver aka Kylo Ren somehow ends up on Earth, 65 million years ago before 'The Asteroid' hits...
Fasolasuchus, a colossal predator and one of the largest terrestrial pseudosuchians ever, ruled the ancient lands with its sheer size and power. On the other hand, Jakapil, a small-sized, agile archosaur, thrived as a swift terrestrial hunter. In this episode, we'll explore the fascinating lives of these two prehistoric beasts, uncovering their hunting strategies, anatomy, and the ecosystems they inhabited...
#dinosaurs #65themovie #65 #fasolasuchus #deinosuchus #dinosaur
Пікірлер: 269
Turns out the 2 weird dinosaurs were indeed real...Fasolasuchus and Jakapil.....
@canonbehenna612
Жыл бұрын
Yeah the jakapil could use a more accurate design but the fasolasuchus is prefect the way it is
@promemerboy1765
Жыл бұрын
3:36 this creature was confirmed to be Lagosuchus
@spinosaurusstriker
Жыл бұрын
THERE IS LITERALLY NO OFICIAL CITING OF THIS, you were probably just gaslighted into believing that becauae a bunch if people called them that, the jakapil was released to the pubick when the movie was finishing production man cmon. The other wqs originally a trike but because of test screenijg they needed to change the design.
@Mega-Tales
Жыл бұрын
@@spinosaurusstriker are you saying the Jakapil was discovered AFTER the movie was made?
@spinosaurusstriker
Жыл бұрын
@@Mega-Tales the movie was finishing production when the jakapil was released to the public, when a fossil is discovered they inmediatamently don't release it firn they need to study it to have some sort of form to the animal, the jakapil was released when the movie had only like 3 months to be released.
Agree with the carnivores in the beginning being Indo’s (or Fasolasuchus‘s) babies. And the dino snout in the waterfall was not a Tyrannosaurid but in fact the Fasolasuchus. All comes together for the final battle with the Faso pissed off because 1) It’s face was all bloodied right where Kylo shot her through the waterfall. 2) He shot her kids. 3) And most importantly, he hasn’t let her eat him yet.
@LocalGiganfan1980
23 күн бұрын
Does the fasolasuchas have a confirm gender or are you speculating, either way makes somewhat sense.
2:36 That’s a Jakapil 2:42 And those are the real Troodons 3:35 Lagosuchus
@pilkers2
11 ай бұрын
Troodon isnt real
@lootthebluecrayon7729
11 ай бұрын
@@pilkers2 sir i believe the troodon being fake was debunked a longgggg while ago or am i wrong
@pilkers2
11 ай бұрын
@@lootthebluecrayon7729 I haven’t heard anything about that
@Geniusprimate
4 ай бұрын
@@pilkers2 you're stupid, STOP CALLING TROODON A FAKE THING, TROODON IS REAL AND IT ALWAYS WILL BE, TROODON IS A GENUS OF TROODONTIDS AND IT HAVE APPEAR IN ALOT OF MEDIA LIKE DINOSAUR TRAIN,DINO DANA, ICE AGE AND JURASSIC PARK!!!!!!!!!
@JohnSmith-wo2fz
3 ай бұрын
@@lootthebluecrayon7729 They're all fake. Idiot.
The movie was good. However, I really wish that we could've seen more herbivores and pterosaurs....
It would have been cool to see ‘accurate’ dinosaurs for once. With feathers, some with reeled back lower jaws, and realistic noises. In my opinion, how dinosaurs sound in reality is way scarier than anything the movies have produced. It’s actually terrifying if you haven’t heard it yet.
@yxx_chris_xxy
10 ай бұрын
Are you talking of pigeons? I dislike their sound too...
@FOAB-Carlos
9 ай бұрын
It's a movie.
People sometimes forgot that this is a fictional movie. A sci-fi, not a documentary.
Yes I remember that this was a fasolasuchus and I was shocked to learn the real thing isn't far off in size 😮
@ZOZObeepboop
Жыл бұрын
where did you read the size wasn't far off? im seeing size comparisons to humans and the size is wayyyy off
@mrdeadlybootz5414
10 ай бұрын
@@ZOZObeepboop agreed this thing was the size of a damn spino haha
We only discovered 1% of the past, 1% of creaures who have lived in the past.
I don’t know why people are getting mad at the way the Dino’s look when we don’t even know what they actually looked like
@crazymonkey1218
Жыл бұрын
Except we DO know enough about how they looked to debunk pretty much all of these.
@chiboz3483
Жыл бұрын
@@crazymonkey1218 not exactly
@Lxcifery_
Жыл бұрын
one of the dumbest comments i've read
@787entertainment4
Жыл бұрын
@chiboz3483 A lot of Paleontology is inference yes. However, that does not mean that we simply have no idea what dinosaurs look like. We can also look at phylogenetics, dinosaurs are reptiles that evolved into birds. Therefore we can look at both modern birds and modern reptiles to get a mental picture of a dinosaur. This film flat out depicts very inaccurate animals, they gave them crocodile like skin. Some of the carnivorous dinosaurs in the movie were quadrupedal, which of course we have no evidence of. I think the reason people are upset at the designs is not necessarily inaccuracy, as we see plenty of that in Jurassic park and the movies remain well liked today. But rather the complete disregard for any semblance of realism. These were not dinosaurs, they were crazy dragon monsters. Which people did not go to see.
@Captianmex1C0
Жыл бұрын
We do know what they looked liked lmao, the dinosaurs in 65 are even more outdated in design than the first Jurassic park movie
The movie was incredible, and I loved it.
@Howza_the_lego_guy7784
7 ай бұрын
Same
What about the one in the water in the very beginning?
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
unknown. Could be a crocodilian or a serpent
The tyrankolosaurus part was funny😂😂
Actually a decent movie and interesting to see a dinosaur take that has no connection to the Jurassic series 7/10
@Mega-Tales
Жыл бұрын
Yeah I'm surprised they don't make more dinosaur movies, considering they make so much money. Plus no one owns the rights to the T. rex.
@kai6xx
Жыл бұрын
Agreed
@brianshepherd9927
Жыл бұрын
Same!
Not trynna be that one nerd, but troodon isn’t a valid species anymore.
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
actually its both
@thefatraptor4424
6 күн бұрын
@@James.Oakleaf wdym both
@James.Oakleaf
6 күн бұрын
@@thefatraptor4424 its a common species, but it is also the genus and group name
@thefatraptor4424
5 күн бұрын
@@James.Oakleaf i know that there are troodontids, but troodon, the single animal is no longer valid. you can even search it up, or read an article.
The last one is supposed to be a fasolasuchus, even though it lived way earlier in the upper triassic.
4:52 10 is a Fasolasuchus, it's huge, it's similar to Postosuchus, but it's much bigger!
@Mega-Tales
Жыл бұрын
omg ur right
@spinosaurusstriker
Жыл бұрын
Its literally not
@199512Lars
Жыл бұрын
That thing is easily as big as T-Rex and supposed to be from the late cretaceous, so I assume it's just a fully made up species 😄
@thejoker15678
Жыл бұрын
Definitely a Faoslasuchus, Why is this so hard to believe?! Spinosaurus Striker, stop getting bosses with the Fasolasuchus in 65, leave people alone with that.
For anyone wondering why people take issue with the dinosaurs of this movie is because they literally made some of them up. The T rex/Ankylosaur combo is the prime example. No bones ever even suggest this kind of composition. Just in case anyone was annoyed with chiboz like i was.
The so-called T-Rex somewhat looks like a Triassic 4-legged archosaur called Postosuchus
@ZOZObeepboop
Жыл бұрын
that's what i was thinking too it's just a kinda shrink wrapped and fucking huge postosuchus
@axelerater
11 ай бұрын
There is something larger than them
@Morrison-saber-tooth
11 ай бұрын
@@axelerater its not postosuchus, it was fictonial theropod
@axelerater
11 ай бұрын
@@Morrison-saber-tooth thats exactly what i said
@Morrison-saber-tooth
11 ай бұрын
@@axelerater oh sorry, thought you was talking about fasolasuchus or prestosuchus
Brilliant movie should of been a bigger hit will be huge on streaming
@LocalGiganfan1980
23 күн бұрын
Exactly, I loved the movie when it released.
The Crawler dinosaur whatever it is looks very similar to Indominus Rex for JW and the sounds are basically identical
#4 AnKYLOsaurus 🤣🤣🤣 what a tribute
"We don't know which continent this plays on" -- we do, the chicxulub asteroid crashes down right next to them, so they are in Mexico.
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
It looks more like Wyoming to me. Like Yellowstone. Geysers, redwood forests. I think it was Old Faithful that killed the Fasalosuchus
It’s actually a good film me and my family quite enjoyed and we’re scared of it but there some problems like the wish the theropod arrived earlier to have a dinosaur battle with the 2 T. rex and wishing there some sauropods,hardorsaurs ceratopsians and other late Cretaceous Dino’s
@Mega-Tales
Жыл бұрын
they had a very low budget. 'only' 44 mil
Always confused me how there’s no herbivores in the movie… just a ton of predators
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
Jakapil is an Herbivore
I wished 65 used Siats as one of the appearing dinosaur instead of always sticking with a T-Rex
The first time I watched this movies I was high at the AMC and the 5th guy you have up there, "Unknown Dino", legitimately made me piss my pants a little. I did not like the way that monster moved.
Honestly as a paleo enthusiast I loved the unrealistic dinos. Sometimes we just want a thrilling wild time. Not everything needs to be Prehistoric Planet level🤣
@Mega-Tales
5 ай бұрын
just curiuous, which would you say was the closest to a real dinosaur, and which one was miles off?
I liked The movie much more than 2 last jurasic Worlds. Ppl only complain.... should be happy we got Good Dino movie since years
The Trankylosaurus is actually a Jakapil
@Mega-Tales
Жыл бұрын
omg ur right
@Rexred09
Жыл бұрын
@mysticdragonboythehelpful1459It is Jakapil
@promemerboy1765
Жыл бұрын
If there is a giant fasolasuchus and a massively oversized Lagosuchus, then that’s a jakapil
@spinosaurusstriker
Жыл бұрын
@@promemerboy1765well none of those things were what you are saying, the jakapil was released to the public when the movie finished production, the supposed falosuchus is just a replacement for the original trike because if the test screenings, and the lagosuchus is just a made up species the (lago attack) name just means lake attack because thats were they come from in the movie.
@thejoker15678
Жыл бұрын
The Lago Attack music tells me that these were Lagosuchus. And actually, Lagosuchus is a real species.
Good video 👍
Amazing how they NEVER met one herbivorous dinosaur!!! All meat eaters from the get-go!!
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
actually. Jakapil is an herbivore
The one you called an Indorex is actually a Fasolasuchus. You’re really gonna make up names when they literally tell you what they are?
Being mad a Sci-fi movies for historical innacuracys is beyond me
The mystery rapter is actually a Velocirapter!!
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
no. its an atrociraptor. The head shape and the long legs fits the description of an Atrociraptor.
The creepy one was a Doratodon, but starving. Skinny.
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
Lagosuchus
And they’ve mixed them with actual dinosaurs
We do know where they were. The asteroid hit the Yucatán Peninsula. It hit right where the escape pod launched from. They were in Southern Mexico near the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea.
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
actually. i think it hit Wyoming. The geysers, the redwood forests. I'm certain this was where Yellowstone was first formed. it was Old Faithful that killed the Fasalosuchus
You can get an idea where they are at from the impact which they seemed to be at ground zero so the Yucatan peninsula in Mexico where they found the chicxulub crater. So whatever the continents were then
Have to inform Giganotosaurus carolini is huge now with the size of 10.5 tons & 45 feet long 😊
@Mega-Tales
Жыл бұрын
what's the new information? I had it at 7 tons and 13 meters
@monsterzero521
Жыл бұрын
@@Mega-Tales here it's 10.5 tonnes & 13.5 meters. Bigger than T rex docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GVpHchzogtjkTqQrP7PFM2BAWMGHYHABD-Xnk_6KPj0/edit?usp=drivesdk
@monsterzero521
Жыл бұрын
@@Mega-Tales here it's 13.5 meters & 10.5 tons , so bigger than T rex docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GVpHchzogtjkTqQrP7PFM2BAWMGHYHABD-Xnk_6KPj0/edit?usp=drivesdk
@110demon
Жыл бұрын
@@monsterzero521 Nope this source is unreliable
@danielefabbro822
Жыл бұрын
@@monsterzero521 its a fresh news, but we don't know how big the T-rex was able to become. Seems what we have found until now was just young speciments.
The oviraptor might of had teeth in the movie 💀
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
it did. Similar design to the therizinosaurus
MEGA DINOSAURS TOP.
Movie been criticised because of the era were living in. The age of complaints
even if it is a jakapil, the head shape is still way off - it's clearly a trex or tyrannosaur inspired skull (i mean, ik it is just a movie tho)
No hate to the Jurassic Park franchise but it's probably the reason why people saw the dinosaurs as "unrealistic" granted that Jurassic Park dinosaurs were based with scientific research, but even then those research was purely a theory. We don't really know how they looked and sound like. I encourage every writer out there when writing a dinosaur themed movie to try not replicate the look of Jurassic Park dinosaurs. Go bat-shit crazy with their design and sounds!
Number 6 and 10 are relatives forget the names 10 fasolasuchus and 6 something-suchus. I believe they are part of a terrestrial crocodilian species.
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
Lagosuchus
Normally I am reluctant to compare two films because I believe that each film is a closed universe in itself. But back in 1993 there was this little-known trash B-movie called "Jurassic Park" made by an equally unknown amateur filmmaker named Steven Spielberg (whoever that is 😉). 65 was released in 2023, I repeat: 2023. I don't know about you all, but in the 42 years of my life so far, I have always been an avid fan of anything even remotely related to dinosaurs . So now I have a question: Why is it that a brand new film from this year seems so incredibly shabby when you compare it to a film that is almost 30 years old? Filmmakers today have tools at their disposal that were still in their infancy in 1993. But back then they created something that film fans in general and dinosaur fans in particular are still talking about today. So if a filmmaker today can't do better than something like this with all these technical possibilities, then for me the real weak point is the lack of creative motivation. In short: you filmmakers today can bring to life anything you want, so damn it, work harder!
@timeflies5778
7 ай бұрын
You're absolutely correct. I'll add that JP was a compelling story. 65 was just wanting to make a movie with CGI dinosaurs. Regular humans on another planet 65 million years ago? Gimme a break. The whole premise was poorly conceived.
It’s called a fasolophusucas
The number six of that creature is not nothosaurus its Lagosuchus
@Mega-Tales
Жыл бұрын
why not Fasolasuchus?
@GIHfanboy
Жыл бұрын
@@Mega-Tales yes the number ten is fasolasuchus too i know
#6 is a Lagosuchus #10 is a Fasolasuchus
@promemerboy1765
Жыл бұрын
#4 is a jakapil #5 is a troodontid
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
@@promemerboy1765 #5 Pectinodon
I saw the movie today and it was MID at best… 6/10. Boring AF.
@Mega-Tales
Жыл бұрын
yup, agreed
ahh you missed the bugs (fuck the bugs) lmao
Number 4 THAT IS A JAKAPIL
@Mega-Tales
Жыл бұрын
apparently not...this is a theropod
@thejoker15678
Жыл бұрын
@@Mega-Tales It’s a Thyreophoran, so it’s a Jakapil.
@yxx_chris_xxy
10 ай бұрын
@@thejoker15678 Looks like it.
One thing I don’t like about the dinosaur community is that you can make some involving dinosaurs and if its not “accurate” dinosaurs they’re going to have a stroke 💀
My man, Learn pronunciations! Good vid.
haven't seen the movie because i saw the trailers and didnt find the dino's realistic or interesting enough to watch. this movie just didnt get my interest at all
@joeayala6141
Жыл бұрын
Took me a while to except some dinosaurs, especially the smaller ones, to have feathers. Didn’t see any from the trailer
- 2:40 😆🤣 “This Sorry Little Son-Of-Beetch” …Hard On Em. It Did Walk Away Like “Poor Me” OAN: A Bullet Woulda Saved It 🥺
You missed the Waterdino in the beginning:)
@Mega-Tales
Жыл бұрын
did we see it?
@jordantucker9799
Жыл бұрын
Seems more likely to be a giant eel.
@nickymejias5763
Жыл бұрын
yeah it might of have number 10.
@enzoli23
Жыл бұрын
@@Mega-Tales you missed the dino which came through the "curtain" of water at the cave - or was that just a plain old T-Rex?
It's a jakapil
I honestly liked the movie. Was a different take and a really cool idea IMO.
3:40 Average days in Mid-period Triassic Florida my man. Just another Pseudosuchia, hunting for prey near the beach, Floridan most natural habitat.
Don't have issues with those inaccurate terrible designs but atleast they should had been shown like actual animals and not some mindless screaming killing machines. There was also barely any herbivore shown in there. What did those "monsters" ate? Each other? And that stupidity where the armoured dino got instantly hunted by those skinny raptors though. That's like showing a cheetah easily hunted down a Juvenile 400kg Rhino.
#10 almost Gorgonopsid, but nah, too scaly & too big. Also no Orcsy tusks.
@emperorofscelnar8443
Жыл бұрын
Gorgonopsid would be a Permian creature and a Synapsid not a Dinosaur.
@lawrencelow949
Жыл бұрын
@@emperorofscelnar8443 Yes I know that. And a lot more mammal than reptile.
@promemerboy1765
Жыл бұрын
It’s a fasolasuchus
Continent back then might be connected of china and north america to be one whole continent.
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
Wyoming. Yellowstone. Geysers and redwoods. Old Faithful killed the Fasalosuchus
You missed the first one in the water
Maybe this "Indo-Rex" might be a Nathanosaur. Look below: Dinosauria --> Saurischia --> Theropoda --> Tetanurae --> Carnosauria --> Nathanosauroidea Nathanosauroidea - Deinoscincidae -- Deinoscincus prima -- Tasmaniasaurus australis - Nathanosauridae -- Gallisaurus micronyx -- Nathanosaurinae --- Nathanosaurus pingasorensis --- Carnovenatonax tauroceras --- Elasmovenator natospinax --- Masiakatyrannus trachelopteryx -- Ceratolophosaurinae --- Ceratolophosaurus mongoliensis -- Tarbosuchinae --- Tarbosuchus nigerensis --- Alectrosuchus guillermoi --- Gigantosuchus longicaudi - Ichthyoraptoridae -- Ichthyoraptorinae --- Ichthyoraptor alticristatus --- Saurotitan carnodens --- Stenocheirosaurus brachyonyx -- Daspletovenatorinae --- Daspletovenator lophorhinus --- Postosuchomimus canadensis -- Dracosaurodocinae --- Dracosaurodocus islandensis
I think trankylosaurus is one of my cousins?
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
Jakapil
4:50 that’s a Fasolasuchus, which is not a dinosaur
Cool movie tbh
they were all meat eaters? what a waste
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
no. Jakapil is an herbivore.
It's pronounced Troodon
4:49 its a fasolosuchus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Movie as the Dinos in it, good 👍
compys that wasn't it something else Jurassic wasn't in 65 so that was troodons.
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
Pectinodons
The dinosaur at the climax of the movie that walked on all 4 legs looks like Postosuchus depicted in the beginning of the 1999 TV series Walking with Dinosaurs only scaled up to gigantic proportions which was the apex predator on Earth before other large bipedal dinosaurs evolved, I found this movie to be very disappointing, not only were the creatures of low quality special effects but the story line was corny and unrealistic
I’m confused like it’s fiction why it’s getting backlash lol
5:03 it’s a fasolasuchus
dude you hardly got most of the names right
The “Atrociraptor” you claim it is, looks more like Dromaeosaurus. Atrociraptor is a lot bigger than that. The “Tyrankylosaurus” you also claim it is, is actually a Jakapil. It’s no made up dinosaur they put in this movie. The Compsognathus was actually Troodon, look up the wiki! These quadrupedal reptiles are called Lagosuchus. The “Indo-Rex” is actually a large Triassic crocodilian called Fasolasuchus. It was based off of Jurassic World’s Indominus Rex, Indoraptor and the Giganotosaurus.
@dustingeurts7649
Жыл бұрын
I will go as far as adding, although opinionated, that the smaller carnivores in the beginning were the Fasolasuchus‘s babies. And the dino snout in the waterfall was not a Tyrannosaurid but in fact the Fasolasuchus. All comes together for the final battle with the Faso pissed off because 1) It’s face was all bloodied right where Kylo shot her through the waterfall. 2) He shot her kids. 3) And most importantly, he has let her eat him yet.
@thecomradered
6 ай бұрын
Is there an official source like the film makers in an interview, that states the names of these animals? There is a lot of creative liberty in their design so it is impossible to pinpoint an exact species name for any of the creatures. Like the video creator says, there are thousands of raptor species and the film makers clearly didnt care about accuracy, so the only way to name any of the animals for certain is if one the film makers officially states it.
Were there no herbivores???
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
Jakapil is an herbivore
@James.Oakleaf
7 күн бұрын
Jakapil is an herbivore
its called fasolasuchus
yes he will always be kylo ren
It was a cousin to the Carnotaurus Anna had Osseo Derms running along its back
I think the skeleton was not a T-Rex it didn't match the size so I think it was a Tarbosaurus the died cuz the atrociraptor nearby and killed off the Tarbosaurus
Possibly a puso succus
#6 : Creature from "The Mist" 🤭
I love it!
@Mega-Tales
Жыл бұрын
thanks
Probably still better than 4/6 of the Jurassic park movies
@MisterBigSniff
10 ай бұрын
you mean Jurassic world right?
@TommyPrime4
9 ай бұрын
No it's actually 1/6
What is the name of the gun?
troodon was discontinued as an existing species
@Mega-Tales
5 ай бұрын
discontinued?
@shawmiserix404
5 ай бұрын
@@Mega-Tales essentially the paleontological community got tired of trying to identify a dinosaur they only had a tooth of so they just decided it was no longer canon
@shawmiserix404
5 ай бұрын
@@Mega-Tales there are still troodontids but troodon itself is no longer a valid taxa
Compies are Jurassic, not Cretaceous.
I wont even bother to identify The species shown un this movie.
Probably the small tyrannosaur morose intrepidus
Dog would it kill you to pronounce ONE of these names right? Lol No worries it's not going to kill anybody but dang
Anyone please recommend me some good dino movies. I have watched all jurassic world and park many time...
@Mega-Tales
Жыл бұрын
King Kong has dinos...Tree of Life....
It's different
Dino spring & autumn fashion show
These "dinosaurs" remind me of something of turok
A lot of interesting dinosaurs in this movie.
@Mega-Tales
Жыл бұрын
Yeah at first I was angry like "what is this made up crap?"...turns out they were legit...sizes exaggerated but whatever
@spinosaurusstriker
Жыл бұрын
@@Mega-TalesThey were not dude, the people who told you that are full of bs, their sources are literally (a youtuber told me to)
🚫NO PROFANITY
No brachiosaurus 🥺😔 🦕
@yxx_chris_xxy
10 ай бұрын
They were extinct for nearly 100 million years at that time.