very good Job

@JesseTate

Ай бұрын

Thanks! Appreciate it! Trying to figure out the best system. I reacted to RZ's vid all in one take but it was super long so I decided to cut it up. We'll see if it gets any momentum or if I need to do a more streamlined presentation. Stay tuned for part II

7% of the most deadly'st wars but this redeemer conveniently left that out.

@JesseTate

Ай бұрын

I haven't researched it much tbh, but yeah I'd be curious. I feel like you can draw lines between cause of war, casualties, ideology (and therefore POTENTIAL casualties) and so many other geopolitical factors. Also identifying a single cause for war is pretty reductionist I'd say.

@odraciskatube7725

Ай бұрын

​@@JesseTateskeptical today wars are waged over- disputes over political power, territorial and ethnic issues, and societal stresses such as injustice and poverty some things stay the same but it is as you say reductionist since every thing in that era was in its infancy. that being said religious conflicts are identifiable. be it on land, water, money, labour or power, status, values. here is where it get interesting the WHY i think you can figure that out mainly focus on the ideology of religion.

@swanson_8804

6 күн бұрын

No way you think those were the deadliest wars, just shows you have clear prejudice.

@odraciskatube7725

6 күн бұрын

@@swanson_8804 predjudace against religion fuck yes and proud of it. and im not the only one saying it either. the most bloody and deadly'erst are that of religion. if you know any history.. i just lay it out for you Taiping Rebellion: 20 million 30 Years’ War: 10 million French Wars of Religion: 3 million German Peasant War: 100,000 First War of Keppel Second War of Keppel: 500,000 Wars of the Three Kingdoms: 876,000 War of the Three Henrys Toggenburg War Hessian War Dungan Revolt War of the Julich Succession First Schmalkaldic War Second Schmalkaldic War Nine Years War: 100,000 The Crusades: (8of them)3 million Catholic extermination of the Cathars: 1 million Spanish Conquest of the Americas: 20 million Cromwellian Conquest of Ireland: 618,000 Transatlantic slave trade: 17 million Albigensian Crusade: 7 million Aragonsese Crusade Holocausts: 11 million First War of Villmergen Second War of Villmergen Xinjiang Conflict Kitos War Quatif Conflict Yugoslav Wars Cologne War The Inquisition: 600,000 (though it could have been as high as millions.) Lord’s Resistance Army Insurgence: 200,000 Hussite Wars 80 Years’ War: 700,000 Moro Insurgency: 120,000 Great Turkish War: 300,000 Lebanese civil war: 200,000 Second Sudanese civil war: 2 million First Sudanese civil war: 1.9 million Afghan Civil Wars: 400,000 Afghanistan and Pakistan Wars: 150,000 Nigerian Civil War: 2 million Algerian Civil War: 200,000 Witch executions: 600,000 Rashidun Conquests Ottoman Conquests: 800,000 Timurid Conquests: 17 million i have left out casualty in this list because they were not clear to me i also left out casualty's of religious oppression of individual nature (some have involved in wars) Oliver Cromwell Francisco Pizarro John Calvin King Leopold II of Belgium Tomás de Torquemada Christopher Columbus Pope Urban I Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile Constantine the Great Pope Pius XI King James I of England King Louis XIV of France Andrew Jackson Vlad the Impaler Ivan the Terrible Pope Alexander VI almost forgot bloody mary Emperor Charles V Pope Julius II King Philip II of Spain King Henry VIII of England Francisco Franco well you get to point have 50 names or so. so i haven got round to everything an all of it yet due to time and unrecoreded wars/casualty s, but you can see .. where one spouses a religion of peace that allot of NOT peace. and just plain conquest and murder. i hope these people sit easy in imaginary heaven now.

what do you think about simulation theory?

@JesseTate

Ай бұрын

Good question, I've been thinking about it recently actually in (hopeful) preparation for a series on Fermi Paradox solutions. Obviously my channel's quite small and I need to focus on output. Sometimes I struggle with having too many interests and I plan lots of 'series' without ever doing them. But this Fermi one is really fascinating and has some fun overlaps with philosophy of religion, free will, conscious experience, and so on. I would say if we're NOT in a simulation, I expect the universe to be crawling with life. It's tough because with the Drake Equation (I imagine you're somewhat familiar) we are working with so many uncertain numbers. We basically just have to guess. But it still SEEMS, with what we do know, that the odds of us appearing alone are extremely small. Maybe there's some fringe chance that we just came super early, AND in an isolated pocket of the universe/galaxy, AND the chances of abiogenesis are much smaller than we'd expect, AND planets with tectonic plates and comparable moons and gas giants are super rare . . . . and so on, and so on. Maybe we just got lucky. But what I would expect would be within the next 10,000 years we either: - Find tons of microbes in deep space and realize that simple life is super common, which fills us with dread because intelligent life ought to be there somewhere, likely watching - See a massive portion of the galaxy fill up as some species appears - Find nothing, and it seems more and more likely we are in a simulation It's just very difficult for me to imagine that we are the only ones. A simulation seems far more likely, and could explain why no one else appears. As far as how that relates to questions of god, morality, free will, and consciousness . . . . I need to think about it more. Again it seems like the only things we will ever be able to methodize and interact with fall under a naturalist framework. We can engage in reason and philosophy and discuss the trasncendent or 'phenomenological' elements of being; but we can't really posit a 'system' or a 'functioning' of things outside of science. I guess the longer we go without finding alien life, the more likely I will think it that we are in a simulation, and therefore the more likely that AI is capable of consciousness? Does that make any sense? Lol Great question, thanks! Gave me at least one video idea

Great job

@JesseTate

Ай бұрын

Thanks! I'm still new to this so trying to nail down a style that's efficient, doesn't take loads of time to produce, but still feels somewhat polished and put together. I tried a more organic 'react' style here, unscripted, and am pretty happy with how it turned out but obviously I need to work on eliminating pauses (or not jump-cutting them) and having a delivery fast enough that it will appeal to even casual viewers.

If we compare the track record of people who followed divine revelation with the ones who claim to arrive at objective rational morality the answer become obvious. Our objective morality is shaped by our limited experiences that's why for the most part of human history people have sot of glorified wars and treated women as sub humans.We are perhaps the only generation to denounce wars(because of horrors of WW) completely and traditional gender roles(because we are afraid of putting any responsibility on women) both of which in my opinion are wrong. In short we humans are incapable of reaching perfect morality/system of governance because of our limited experience in this life. Every generation in history of this planet has thought that what they are doing is right(ex-commies,nazis,Romans etc) so how are we different from our ancestors?