To many inaccuracies to mention but heads up thare are two Lexingtons and you have the newer one with the stats of the older one. Some of the ships are way off like completely wrong. Feels like just a little bit more effort woukd have went a long way.

@worldtop_3d

2 ай бұрын

Collecting data and creating videos can be difficult, and errors are inevitable due to a large amount of data..😢I also made some 3D videos about the military. You can watch it if you are interested.

@robertstone9988

2 ай бұрын

@@worldtop_3d the graphics and presentation were grate just a little bit more attention to the facts and details

@worldtop_3d

2 ай бұрын

@@robertstone9988 I agree

@INSPECTORZAP

24 күн бұрын

@@robertstone9988 *CORRECTION* : ( *The* ) the graphics and presentation were ( *Great* ) grate.

@swastikdhar1593

12 күн бұрын

Example: INS Viraat design was displayed in place of INS Vikrant... Years of both Indian carriers are wrong (2 older carriers were completely messed out)

There are so many errors that its not even funny. Ie. Uss midway was in service since '45 and was a typical straight carrier

@Phoenixlp44

3 ай бұрын

Also what the hell did they do to shinano

@robertstone9988

3 ай бұрын

They have the newer Lexington pictured with the older battle cruiser converted Lexingtons stats. And if the Japanese had had that Shinano they might have won the war calls that's a modern ship.

@siroyiryuu

3 ай бұрын

This channel belongs to Indians, what expectations do you have for their work?

@UniversalDataComparison

3 ай бұрын

@@siroyiryuu No, the owner is Russian

@siroyiryuu

3 ай бұрын

@@UniversalDataComparison I watched a few videos they made, they were completely nonsense and could only be watched as comedy. It can only be considered as an Indian pretending to be Russian.

When the Enterprise was stationed in the SF Bay we drove a 42ft boat to within about 100ft of the rear. That thing is HUGE. Armed navy waived us off. I am sure you would not be allowed to get that close today.

@worldtop_3d

2 ай бұрын

That's for sure. Taking photos at close range is not allowed.🤪I also made some 3D videos about the military.

@GNeuman

Ай бұрын

So you found the nuclear wessels then?

@brolinofvandar

25 күн бұрын

You should see a carrier from underneath, in drydock. When I was on the Forrestal, she went into the Philly shipyard for a 2-1/2 year overhaul called SLEP. As an ET, all of our gear was off ship, so we had other duties while in the yard. Initially, I was a supervisor in the Fire Watch Division. So we'd have an idea of what we were sending our guys into, we were given a tour with the gas free engineer (who certifies spaces are okay for humans to enter). At one point, we dropped through a scuttle in the deck and found ourselves climbing down the outside of a tank, in a void space. At the bottom, we stepped down through a cut hole in the hull, onto a step ladder, then to the drydock floor. You think a carrier looks big from alongside in a boat, try looking up at it maybe ten feet over your head.

Displacement is the only true measure of a ships size, not just the length.

@jamieklettke5061

3 ай бұрын

Still goes to the US with the USS Gerald Ford

@crazyhorse3854

3 ай бұрын

thats not what your mom says.

@HanSuhJin24

3 ай бұрын

​@@crazyhorse3854I don't think it's your place to say it here.

@susboi9804

3 ай бұрын

​@@HanSuhJin24no no let him cook

@captainbuggernut9565

2 ай бұрын

Correct. Measuring by displacement the INS Vikrant is 45k tons and HMS Queen Elizabeth is 72K tons. Yet they are they same size.

Shinano has been modernized and equipped with Angled flight deck

@ruemignon

3 ай бұрын

That was right. And all the work had been done underwater.

@andreaciamei2885

3 ай бұрын

and the wind barriers, as well as the catapults were intended for the latest "zeke" fighter models, commonly called "x-wing" by Captain Harloock and his crew

@user-yq9br3mb4o

3 ай бұрын

日本人なのに知らない件

@user-kh8cc4bx7y

3 ай бұрын

And elivaters, looks very american for a ww2 Japanese ship

@user-kx3vh1ux6e

3 ай бұрын

2199年になると宇宙空母シナノとしてイスカンダルに飛び立ちます

Didn't know they had angled flight decks in the 1920s

@edwardhuggins84

3 ай бұрын

They didn't the first carrier to have one was HMS Centaur In 1954

@erikmeyer2323

3 ай бұрын

They didn't. Chat GBT is having an off day.

@rp3351

3 ай бұрын

@@erikmeyer2323 hehehe, don't attribute to AI what can be explained by piss poor human editing =) What's shown there is not the USS Lexington (CV-2), commissioned in 1927, which sank during WW2, but the USS Lexington (CV-16), commissioned in 1943, which survived WW2 and got an angled deck when it was refitted in 1955.

@worldtop_3d

2 ай бұрын

you are very professional🤝I also made a 3D video about military themes, what do you think?

@Christopher_1775

Ай бұрын

IJN Shinano was looking rather anachronistic... 🤔

2:43 You misspelled “Forrestal”. 🤦‍♀️

The French Carrier Clemenceau looks nothing like that.

@calvincanada4723

3 ай бұрын

a lot of them dont. He used the USS Midway to represent USS Lexington and used the USS Nimitz to represent the USS Midway 💀💀

@maximusaugustus4976

3 ай бұрын

@@calvincanada4723 he got wrong with the Sao Paulo as it's the former Foch and there is no skyjump on it. And for the representation he used the russian Kuznetzov.

@calvincanada4723

3 ай бұрын

@@maximusaugustus4976 yeah im sure he was pretty limited on 3d models

@classicalhollywood3254

6 күн бұрын

@@calvincanada4723and the Essex is not from 1950. The last Essex class carrier is from 1950 which it was called the Uss Oriskany. This guy definitely did not do research before he did this video

The Big E still the largest. Original plan was for four of that class. Way too expensive. One and only. Served her Nation for 50 years. Magnificent

@jamieklettke5061

3 ай бұрын

Largest in length, not tonnage

@Dirtnap_McDinglestuffer

2 ай бұрын

my dad served on cvan65 big e from 68-74, then next big e is being built now.

@worldtop_3d

2 ай бұрын

Once glorious💪

@armynurseboy

Ай бұрын

Longest, not the largest.

@MGower4465

Ай бұрын

She also had eight reactors, which probably had a lot to do with her price.

How tall would each flagpole be? Over 100 feet tall? It would also be interesting to see a shot on how the largest aircraft carrier compares against the smallest. That would be a nice way to wrap up the video.

@worldtop_3d

2 ай бұрын

You really take this data seriously😀I also made a 3D video about military themes, what do you think?

São Paulo seemed like Varyag. Being an occidental design, it didn't have an inclined launch ramp.

i have a question did you sell or publis this model

How and where do you make this type of animations/comparisons?

@fredbyoutubing

2 ай бұрын

My guess is that they are 3D models made in Blender and then imported in Unreal Engine for the rendering and animation. It could also be all in blender but the rendering process and water simulation may be harder to achieve or more time consuming.

Hello. I have question, did you use Lumion to do this? Just curious. Nice Comparison scale video.😅😁

Nice but full of flaws. For instance angled flight decks were intruced years after WWII. So the models of the Lexington and the Japanese Shinano are nonsense.

The Sao paulo was a french aircraft carrier, the Foch.

Where are Garibaldi and Cavour?

0:48 OH MY GOD NO WAY OH MY GOD THAT'S MY DEAR KAGA THERE. (Also, wikipedia is wrong, Kaga is 260 meters long, as a Battleship hull, and in her first configuration she was 248m long, but in 1930.october 20. They rebuilt her into her final configuration, and lengthened her to 260m)

1:51 great model of shinano, strange how it looks like a united stats modern day aircraft carrier and not a 1945 Japanese one

0:42 I think the model could simulate the to the RN Cavour (monolithic isle and slightly narrower bow ans Skyjump). the Trieste is slightly larger, taller, has a square bow with a larger skyjump and twin islands. it is also an amphibious operation vessel. 1:47 that would be the Forrestal, not the Shinano!

What software do you use to make videos?

@GeneticDemon1

2 ай бұрын

Create your own software man.

@detabook

2 ай бұрын

@@GeneticDemon1 I can not understand what you say

damn didnt know the shinano was so big it gave the illusion of a nimitz class carrier. didnt know the lexington and the midway got the angled flight deck upgrade package. put some effort in please

JMSDF Kaga Izumo？

@airport4911

2 ай бұрын

空母ではなく護衛艦

I served aboard the USS Independence CVA-62. 1052' LOA, 88,000 ton displacement. She was a great ship. Damage Control/Hull Tech 1968-1970..

La comparativa es incorrecta Si pones portaaeronaves antiguas Pon todas -R 11 Principe de Asturias o el ARA 25 de Mayo ,osea Italianos,Españoles Argentinos etc.. O solo los actuales Ademas incluyes proyectos como los navios nazis otras potencias tambien tuvieron proyectos como España Ademas de los distintos Dedalos que España tuvo activos y ambos con hitos historicos el primero intervino en el primer desembarco aero naval del que se basaron para el desembarco de Sicilia y Normandía Los desembarcos modernos Y el segundo fue el primero con aviones de aterrizaje vertical,despues Uk,Eeuu,Rusia ,Italia e India

That Japanerse Shinano from 1944 looks suspicious...

日本啥時候有單射航母？

Can we agree that this channel holds the Guinness world record for the most inaccuracies in his size comparison videos while having the most subscribers for such a channel?

Amazing thumbnail 😂

Admiral Kuznetsov is not a ship, but a pier that when it sets sail the whole solar system knows about it.

You put the picture of indian aircraft on Brasilian São Paulo. São Paulo it's a Clemenceau class.

Neat vid. I hate to quibble but the USS Forrestal is spelled without the final letter of "l".

Where’s IT Cavour and the concept carrier ships eg RF shtorm, FS DCNS, JS zuikaku, ROKS CVX, CN type 004? And also those carriers in the artcoin market? (CN type 076, JS Izumo)

The Essex Class was NOT commisioned in 1950 the first was commissioned in 1942.

The German Graf Zeppelin never existed.

US is the Juggernaut: first flight, first nuke, first nuclear powered submarine, first nuclear powered aircraft carrier etc. US tech firms, just wow! Look at the 10 biggest companies on Earth, 8 are US tech firms.

@cetdac3

3 ай бұрын

And just look at all the poverty in that country...shameful...

@quakerninja

3 ай бұрын

List of countries who landed humans on the moon would be a short video.

@rrrrrrr9859

2 ай бұрын

@@cetdac3the US “poverty” line still puts us at the top 1% of wealth on the planet

@cetdac3

2 ай бұрын

@@rrrrrrr9859 somehow that must make homeless people and child poverty ok ...oh dear...

@worldtop_3d

2 ай бұрын

You are very professional.I also made some 3D videos about the military. You can watch it if you are interested.

Rf sthroom?

It is amazing and strange that only the United States and China are now countries that can afford to build an aircraft carrier fleet,Other countries simply keep these ships and cannot afford to build more.

@taylorlatch2635

Ай бұрын

United Kingdom has 2 brand new carriers, 3rd on the way. They carry f35 jets and are ready to go.

@answerhsiao0610

Ай бұрын

Building a super aircraft carrier is not an easy task. In addition to various technologies, it also requires strong economic support.

Shinano didn´t have a angled deck...

1:51 1944年とは思えない信濃w

As a former crew member, I'd like to point out that it is Forrestal, not Forresta. And it was the first class referred to as a "super carrier", because it was the first class built with an angle deck, which had been retrofitted to earlier ships.

The Lexingtom from 1927 was a straight deck carrier. She's depicted with an angled deck.

Чтож... открою одну тайну...В начале видео показана лодка hohlov, и то которую наклянчили🙂

@user-vd6rd4bb5j

2 ай бұрын

и парашенко с веслом.

いつから信濃がアングルドデッキになったんだ？

Yah, don't know how accurate all the models are but like has been mentioned the Shinano was a typical WW2 design single flight deck, not the more modern jet age design that started in the 50s??

Italy has 3 aircraft carriers, why is only one shown here?

That is not what the Clemenceau or Shinano look like. Your illustrations for those 2 look more like Forrestal class carriers.

Interesting that the smallest one starts at about the same size as the largest submarine.

Show some more “at scale” towards the end.

The WW2 carriers Shinano and Lexington had angled flight decks?

@jimmypagesnyper

2 ай бұрын

não possuem, esses caras que colocaram errado.

@apersondoingthings5689

Ай бұрын

Yeah, I thought archerfish sunk shinano. Maybe they modernized it under water. Also I think they are using the Essex class Lexington which was not built in 1927

The cost of operation is 1 million dolar per day. Gsus!

Forrestal is missing the L from it's name.

I didn’t know that Shinano had an angled deck.

awesome

A arte do porta-aviões São Paulo, do Brasil, está errada, pois está igual ao do russo Kuznetsov, mas o São Paulo era igual o Clemenceau, francês. Era da mesma classe do navio francês.

Tcg Anadolu 🇹🇷🇦🇿

Why is the Shinano represented by the USS Forestal?

most of these arent aircarft carriers

@Phoenixlp44

3 ай бұрын

Well then what are they?

@chriswhite3692

3 ай бұрын

what?

@Xyzambd234

3 ай бұрын

helicopter carriers@@Phoenixlp44

Shinano didn't look like that.

0:55 やっぱCV6エンタープライズが1番好きや

Music name please

Shinano? maniac!

1:49 Why does Shinano looks like a modern super carrier?

You make São Paulo a little different from the actual aircraft carrier. Since is a Clemenceau class ship (Ex-Foch) you should only do a copy and paste from the Clemenceau ship.

NICE, very nice.

you missed at least 4 british aircraft carriers lol

Many of these are not even aircraft carriers, they are amphibious assault ships (which do carry some vtol planes and attack helicopters)

1:48　鳴海章氏の「原子力空母信濃」シリーズではアングルド・デッキの信濃が登場しましたね。でも、あの艦はニミッツ級より大きな艦だったから、この信濃は史実と創作のミックスになっていますね。

missing cavour and garibaldi aircraft carrier

Porque el clemence y el Sao Paulo son diferentes si son del mismo tipo

Do carriers even get used? WE read about missiles and drones flying all over the place in wars and conflicts nowadays but rarely of carriers being used as a launch base, except in very limited peripheral action.

You didn't mention ins vikrant❤

The Sao Paulo is in reality the aircraft carrier Foch... which was bought by Brazil from France and which renamed it.

Não sabia que o brasil ja operou um Admiral Kuznetsov

ちょっと待て！！ 信濃って、甲板２つあるヤツだったっけ？？

艦橋の位置が違うモデルがある。あと日本にカタパルト式の空母はない

Very good video 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

- Что такое авианосец? - Это очень хорошая цель.

I don't think we should make any more. ICBMs are best deterrents. We should invest in having ICBMs in stable orbiting satellites, even on the moon to launch at Earth if need be. We need to think outside the box. Warships are just sitting ducks these days

@ChakatBlackstar

3 ай бұрын

That would be super illegal, and trying to do that would start WW3.

@George.Coleman

3 ай бұрын

@@ChakatBlackstar probably already doing it mate

@ChakatBlackstar

3 ай бұрын

@@George.Coleman Launching a satellite isn't exactly a subtle activity, much less one large enough to carry a warhead. And again, ILLEGAL. Breaking that treaty would definitely trigger a war. Unnecessarily since there are more than enough conventional nukes.

@answerhsiao0610

Ай бұрын

Why do you always think about war? Do you think a world war can bring you any benefits?

@George.Coleman

Ай бұрын

@@answerhsiao0610 yes, being a step ahead in warfare is the difference between existing and not

Many countries you shown don't have aircraft carriers at all.

El ara independencia medía 222 metros no 192. Aparte que no pusiste al ara 25 de mayo.

Too many channels trying to jump on this bandwagon, using poor research. Agree about CVN-65 though. Saw her once in Oz. She is HUGE!

Российский авианосец показан как советский, хотя индийские и китайские тоже построены в советском союзе

@dimarashkoiobov5570

3 ай бұрын

Просто китайцы и индусы их сильно модернизировали , улучшили . А Кузя как был совком так и остается нетронутым

@L3gionNameMe

3 ай бұрын

​@@dimarashkoiobov5570 Кузнецов модифицировали еще в 2008, так что сравнение действительно не корректно.

@tiaoyi-bx5yi

2 ай бұрын

China's third carrier uses electromagnetic catapult technology, which the Russian carrier does not have. Shipbuilding technology China has far exceeded Russia, China's shipbuilding orders number one in the world, 50% of the world's total!

USS Forrestal not Forresta

И какой толк с этого рейтинга?

There are so many incorrect things on this, you'd need an entire military history class to cover them all! 🤣

O porta aviões atribuído ao Brasil está errado. O São Paulo era o Clemenceau, da França.

1:47 Shinano!?Did it exist?

My dude you didnt even bother to get the correct model for over half these ships

The USS Enterprise turns up in Star Trek: The Voyage Home, when Chekov is looking for a nuclear wessel. 😁 The HMS Queen Elizabeth was supposed to go to an NATO exercise, but had to be replaced by HMS Prince of Wales, recently, due to propeller problems.

@TheVanguard47

3 ай бұрын

That wasn’t the Enterprise, but USS Ranger.

@julianaylor4351

3 ай бұрын

@@TheVanguard47 So they lied...naughty.

@worldtop_3d

2 ай бұрын

You are very professional.I also made some 3D videos about the military. You can watch it if you are interested.

Enquanto o porta avião Rússia está em manutenção porque aconteceu mais de 4 acidentes nele ocorrendo mortes, o do Brasil não, ocorreu só 1 acidente e o Brasil o aposentou.😅😅😅

Hello Gravity 🤩🤩🤩🤩

1:48 Not Shinano. この空母は、信濃ではありません。

@apersondoingthings5689

Ай бұрын

Yeah I think it’s just strait up the forestal

Good idea but frankly it needs to be far more accurate in the design specifications - the artistic impressions destroy a good and informative concept's credibility. It might have been better to use file photographs. It should also be mentioned that size = crew = capital cost = supply logistics issues = docking problems = maintenance issues : the list goes on & on.

Big E was the location for Top Gun

Cavour? Garibaldi?

IJN Shinano did not have an angled flight deck!

Amazing

🇺🇸🦅🇺🇲🦅🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸

ARA 25 de mayo??