Fell asleep and woke up to this

@davidc5400

Жыл бұрын

same

@inside4887

Жыл бұрын

Same 😂

@off5346

Жыл бұрын

Same

@MontrealAI

Жыл бұрын

Loved our AI Debate 2?

@usmaankhajah3639

Жыл бұрын

@@MontrealAI I fell asleep watching ant videos, slept through the first debate and woke up to some coughin in the second debate

Gary's openning statement 14:00

So no one is working to build Cylons? Well that's disappointing. *final copy of the video really helps with the re-watch.

I loved everything about this discussion except one comment. To say your main interest in AI has to do with the field being "fun" is so frustrating to me.. For 1000 reasons, general AI will make the world a better place for everyone. That is the reason. Im a machine learning operations engineer and that is exactly why I joined the field. All philinthropic causes and political justice movements are little to none compared to the potential benefits of AI. One person mentioned UBI during that segment and that's the only point during that topic that I agreed with. Everything else was thought provoking and superb!

this is so fun!

Interested in listening intersection of Neuroscience and AI Computing theory

@user-kf5we5hx4k

Жыл бұрын

😅😅😅

я спал и под утро наткнулся на это:

💖💗💖💗💖

I believe judea pearl has great points to deliver, but i fail to fail to understand a lot of them because of the sound :(

@MontrealAI

3 жыл бұрын

"Edited script of J. Pearl talk at Montreal-AI, Debate 2", Judea Pearl, 2020: causality.cs.ucla.edu/blog/index.php/2020/12/28/edited-script-of-j-pearl-talk-at-montreal-ai-debate-2/

Great panel. I think Gary should've started with the last question. I.e I would love to hear a modified version about the perspectives of what environment, datasets, (streaming or not) etc. are essential to gain the satisfactory understanding of human-like intelligence.

@MontrealAI

3 жыл бұрын

Great suggestion!

@yudiamahendra3366

Жыл бұрын

@@MontrealAI p

Bro why did i watch this i js waked up 😢

2:01:00 "It's clear that private interests will not support diversity, equity, and inclusion....Jeff Dean should be ashamed." Also Celeste: 1. People don't learn deeply about most things. 2. People make up their minds quickly. 3. Once a person has made up their mind, they don't easily revise. (1:58:55)

@Daniel-ih4zh

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, and from what I read Timnit was fired for the subsequent demands/ultimatum, not because of the paper. It's ashame some of the speakers were being so dishonest

@irismiller9951

Жыл бұрын

​@@Daniel-ih4zh 13:24

First one and a half hours were fantastic! Absolutely wonderful!! Have not watched past this point as yet but I think this is just such a wonderful resource for AI enthusiasts. Everyone on this panel is brilliant. From 1982 to 2000 I just thought the AI 'researchers' were 'so' wrong with their assumptions and directions of pursuit - and probably well after 2000 as well. At last researchers and experimenters seem to be 'waking up' to the deeper issues. However no one yet has explicitly said that consciousness must necessarily precede intelligence. This is something that I have always insisted upon. First build a conscious machine - then make it intelligent. I am completely serious about this.

@mattizzle81

Жыл бұрын

That requires a definition of what that even means. I don’t think even the smartest people have a good definition of what “conscious” is. Do you? If you have it figured out you must he the first 😂

@MarkLucasProductions

Жыл бұрын

@@mattizzle81 I am inclined to say 'fair point' but I should muster a retort from a position of at least some semblance of strength. I do mean sentience when I say 'consciousness' and I do have some solid views on what consciousness may actually 'be'. In the first place it's strangely unique to each individual sentient being. How would we know we had built a conscious machine if each consciousness is unique to itself? Well, all I am saying is that a truly intelligent machine (as I conceive of the word intelligence) must not be one that manipulates incoming data. Consciousness in NOT computation. A true AI will report not on 'the outside world' but on its internal states. We are not data processing machines in the world. Instead, we are 'of' the world. Biology has not come from beyond and adapted itself to its colonized environment. Biology is wholly an 'expression' of its environment. Its environment and it are 'one'. Consciousness is 'of' what consciousness 'is'. Consciousness exists purely in virtue of that of which conscious is had. Absent that of which one is conscious one is 'not' conscious. Sorry about the length. This subject requires far more than can be said in a KZread comment.

@user-typeX

9 ай бұрын

@@mattizzle81g lol ymm you e🎉

Understanding itself is a bias. Saying that a system is biased is saying that it favors an understanding that the accuser does not appreciate.

oh shit i left my youtube going again

Thank you for your insights Really interesting discussion

@MontrealAI

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for listening to #AIDebate2

@tedytedy3323

Жыл бұрын

😊

@tedytedy3323

Жыл бұрын

o

@tedytedy3323

Жыл бұрын

oo

@tedytedy3323

Жыл бұрын

l

There is a little known contradiction inherent to all information-based systems that makes it impossible for machines to understand, worst yet, think. If they knew, these debates will be different. I only hope they learn about it soon, for there is no time to lose.

These robots debating are fascinating

I feel its just better to watch Machine Learning Street Talk week by week than this marathon of authors talking past each other.

@mattizzle81

Жыл бұрын

lol😅

@tedytedy3323

Жыл бұрын

pl

@tedytedy3323

Жыл бұрын

p

@tedytedy3323

Жыл бұрын

l

@tedytedy3323

Жыл бұрын

pp

😮

[ A G I D E B A T E ] 1 5 , 0 0 0 + A T T E N D E E S ! [ R S V P ] : aidebate3.eventbrite.ca It All Comes Down To AGI DEBATE [ P R O G R A M ] It takes a village . . . Four themes are at the crux of the AGI Debate, with four panels of the world's most distinguished researchers and experts on AGI : Panel 1: Ethics and morality Panel 2: Beyond System I Panel 3: Cognition and Neuroscience Panel 4: AI: Has it done more good or harm? Speakers: Erik Brynjolfsson, Yejin Choi, Noam Chomsky, Jeff Clune, David Ferrucci, Artur d'Avila Garcez, Michelle Rempel Garner, Dileep George, Sara Hooker, Anja Kaspersen, Konrad Kording, Kai-Fu Lee, Francesca Rossi, Jürgen Schmidhuber, Meredith Whitaker. Moderator and co-organizer (with Vincent Boucher): Gary Marcus. Professor Gary Marcus is a Scientist, Best-Selling Author, and Entrepreneur. He is Founder and CEO of Robust.AI. His newest book, Rebooting AI: Building Machines We Can Trust, aims to shake up the field of artificial intelligence and has been praised by Noam Chomsky, Steven Pinker and Garry Kasparov. Vincent Boucher is President of Montreal.AI and Quebec.AI. Join us as we engage in this historic and high-minded debate! [ W E B S I T E ] : agidebate.com/ #AIDebate #AGIDebate #MontrealAI #QuebecAI #QuebecArtificialIntelligence

Я наоборот уснул и полностью пока они шли я спал очень крепко😅. Тем более я ни слова не понимаю