Note: this is not applicable for the x/mr16 and x/mr12 mixers because they do not have ULTRANET connectivity Also you cannot expand the inputs of the x/mr18 because the ultranet port is only for outputs

@ameyjadhav7008

Жыл бұрын

Not exactly right, I have a xr18 & used ultranet for my turbo sound tfx 152 monitor & also used for Behringer p16.😊

@danielkharrat

Жыл бұрын

@ameyjadhav7008 yes that's exactly what I'm saying

@brunodacosta_soundtec6036

5 ай бұрын

hello, cheers from Lisbon, Portugal, so if I buy an X18 can I get 32 ​​channels or more? How do I then operate these extra channels on the mixer?

@danielkharrat

5 ай бұрын

@brunodacosta_soundtec6036 no you only get 18 input channels

@mattsmusika

4 ай бұрын

@@danielkharrat Nice idea! Thanks for the contribution. Perhaps the 4 FX slots are inserts in the FX Sends (as opposed to the returns), maybe if you drop graphics in the FX slots you have graphics on those outputs.... so still useful for audio signals from mics. Maybe?

behringer made an ultranet/stageconnect adapter, they could make an ultranet/aes-50, so the mr18 becomes a stagebox for the m32

the best part, is that if you route the return of the effect to the ultranet, you now get 4 outputs in stereo, that is, 8 additional outputs.

@fmgdias

Жыл бұрын

and if somehow it were possible to pan the send for the effect, it would be possible to use these 8 auxiliary outputs in mono.

Bravo, nice thinking Daniel!!

Love that you’re still putting out videos for all of us. Big thumbs up to you! That said, I’ve been looking at one of those for getting outputs on my rack x32 like when I need a boatload of stereo in ear sends. I don’t know what country you’re from, but it would be my pleasure to assist in some way for you to get things. Just a thought.

@danielkharrat

Жыл бұрын

Thank you🙏🏻 you are very kind :)

I mix worship on an M32r and also have an MR18 that I've used for live gigs. We're using the powered Turbosound wedges with the coaxial speakers. They also take ultranet. But that is not my point. Usually the backup singers just want to hear themselves as they get plenty of the vox and instruments in the ambient sound on stage. They just need to hear their own voice for pitch and tone production. So using the ultranet you could send the input channel directly out to the singer to hear themselves. Level would just have to happen at the wedge, which could be a problem.

Great minds think alike 😊

Very useful information. Thanks. I was about to get an analog splitter snake. This is much more useful.

That's quite neat. I've used the FX send on smaller analogue desks to run monitor feeds (but they were post fader unfortunately), but never thought to use the FX sends on the XR18 for extra monitors. As I plan on using 2 of the 6 Aux buses for a stereo "Livestream" feed, that leaves me with only 4 possible monitor feeds, and since I only use 2 of the FX sends for "Instrument Reverb" and "Vocal Reverb" I can then make use of the remaining 2 FX sends for monitor sends. Btw, I'm also using an Audix T-50 K Inline impedance converter so that I can plug my talkback microphone into inputs 17/18, so that I don't use up any of the precious 16 channels.

Smart

So what are you actually gaining if you use effects channels for bus mixes? You lose all effects. Who mixes without effects? Can you explain additional purposes of this device? Thanks

I have looked at the Klark teknik dm8808 also but its more exspensive

do these output boxes use better converters than the x32 rack or xr18? Thanks

I would love to have a DN4816-O either to use as a split-snake, but you could also use it as a matrix. Using the FX buses for monitors is a great idea too. I'm glad that there are more purposes built into ultranet than one could appreciate at first impressions.

I think a great idea with this mixer would be to connect the mr18 mixer to a computer create 14 mono/7 stereo mix buses and 2 routed to the computer for a 2 bus mix from the mixer with backing tracks etc routed to each bus and then return back to the ultranet with those buses. for each musician. supply the musicians with a behringer microMon ma400 so that they can control their instrument volume and the bus mix volume and send the instrument to the mixer.

Hi bro ! Thanks for your amazing videos. I have a question. Do you know if I can use the midas DN4888 to add inputs and outputs to my XR18? Can I use ultranet - output 1 ( stage connect ) in the DN4888 for sending and receiving sound? Thanks in advance!

@danielkharrat

3 ай бұрын

No you cannot add inputs to the xr18, the ultranet port is only for outputs

hi thank you for the explanation but I would like to know if it is possible to do an equalization on the output of the dn4816-0 if I put stage monitors

@danielkharrat

2 ай бұрын

No. the eq you do is on the bus. You can't eq an output

@cesarjeanchristophe339

2 ай бұрын

Thanks brother

Question - can the FX via Ultranet be in stereo so I could have this an an extra stereo output for in-ears? Would it take up two FX sends or just one since I think the FX sends are stereo. I guess I'd like to know how to do this if possible.

@danielkharrat

10 ай бұрын

You would send the channels to an fx bus Let's say you put the stereo delay effect on that bus Turn the mix all the way down on that effect so that you're only getting the dry signal You'll receive that signal on the effect return channel You have to turn off the main stereo button so that it doesn't go to your main mix Then in the ultranet page you assign ultranet 1 to FX 1L and ultranet 2 to FX 1R for example And that effect return channel would be your "bus master"

@pburner

10 ай бұрын

Let me look into this and see if makes sense once I get into things. Thanks!

Love your explanation and it looks like im at the right spot for my question. Here goes: Im using the mr18 in my homestudio as an interface. Recently i bought a behringer p16 for monitoring (obviously). Butttt..... in don't want all the drums on my p16, i want just 2 channels for al the drums. How can i do that? Hoping for respond, Cheers Robert-Jan

@danielkharrat

4 ай бұрын

Make a stereo bus and send all the drums to it then in the ultranet page assign 2 of the ultranet channels to that stereo bus

Is there any alternative to DN4816-O? Like a cheaper version that function just like it? I only need like 2 more output and on a tight budget

@danielkharrat

8 ай бұрын

Unfortunately no. But you can use the headphones output and assign 2 different busses tl it if you're not doing that already

@neoslyke

8 ай бұрын

@@danielkharrat i only found 1 video that shows it can be done on XR12 & XR16 but comment says it can't be done on XR18

@danielkharrat

8 ай бұрын

@@neoslyke kzread.info/dash/bejne/fZZp17SNdcatabQ.html

so what are you going to do with the effects????

@eaglebak

9 ай бұрын

I would like to know that to?`How do you add reverb, delay etc to your FOH signal if you are using the FX busses for monitoring?

how many stereo monitor mixes can you get in total?

@danielkharrat

Жыл бұрын

3 stereo monitors if you're only using the 6 aux busses 5 stereo monitors if you're also using all 4 of the effects busses together with the normal 6 aux busses

@abrahamsotelo6188

Жыл бұрын

@@danielkharrat thank you

Could I also use a DN4816-i? and get inputs from the stage?

@danielkharrat

11 ай бұрын

No. The ultranet port only sends outputs out of the mixer

How to eq the 16 outputs from? dn4816

@danielkharrat

11 ай бұрын

You don't eq outputs you eq what's assigned to it So if you assign a bus to that output you do the eq on the bus

Can we perharps just use long cat5 cable (30 meters length in example) and then put the DN4816 beside the FOH mixers instead of put the DN4816 in the same rack with XR? I mean to make xlr requirement shorter for connectiing the analog out to the FOH Mixers. I hope u understand my words. Pardon for my bad english.

@danielkharrat

Жыл бұрын

Yes of course it doesn't have to be next to the mixer The shielded cat5 ethernet cable can be 75 meters long

@raijuventus

Жыл бұрын

@@danielkharrat wooww i see. So the usage of longer cat5 cable wont affecting the sound quality or latency, right?

@danielkharrat

Жыл бұрын

@Rainier Messakh no its same thing as you would do with the p16 personal monitors It's a digital signal so it doesn't degrade with cable length like it does with analog

@raijuventus

Жыл бұрын

Great to hear that. And what about usage of condenser mic? If we plugged the condensor on our XR and turn the phantom on, should we also turn the phantom on the FOH mixer? Sorry for too much asking 🤭

@danielkharrat

Жыл бұрын

No the condenser microphone is powered by the phantom power of the preamp that it's directly plugged into Don't use phantom power on anything else because it may damage your equipment

For that reason I bought the DN4816-0. There is only one problem. My drummer is using the P16-M Headphone Mixer/Monitor. When the DN4816-0 is pluged into the MR18's Ultranet out, I can't connect the Output from the DN4816-0 to his P16-M. If I want to have the connection, I need to go into the P16-M first, and then use the "Trough" connector into the DN4816-0's Ultranet input. I would have loved the possibility to plug the MR18's Ultranet out into the DN4816-0, have the 16 XLR outs for the FoH-desk, and use the second cat-connector for daisy chaining into the P16-M. The only way , If I want to prevent to put a cat-cable into the P16-M first and then replug the Ultranet-Trough with the DN4816-0 is the Klark Teknik DN4816-U converter or use an Ultranet-splitter. Would have been great, if the cat-output of the DN4816-0 would support the Ultranet format.

@danielkharrat

Жыл бұрын

Hmm that's weird. It is ultranet and you can daisy chain multiple of these units. It's strange that it doesn't talk to the p16 mixer. I'll take your word for it because i don't have this unit in my country to try it out but maybe they would fix this with a firmware update in the future

@jgfakjshfdgkajshd

11 ай бұрын

get a P16D then, so you can have multiple outs and you can skip power supply for drummer P16M

how can we access the 16 output of dn4816-O ?

@danielkharrat

2 ай бұрын

In the ultranet page

can this work for behringer xr18

@danielkharrat

Жыл бұрын

Yes it's basically the same mixer As long as it has an ULTRANET port, it works

Still a missing piece in this puzzle, how to get 6 stereo pairs out for in ear monitor mixes, currently you are limited to mono monitor mixes fine for stage wedges, but the in ear people are now demanding stereo in ear mixes.

@PaulGibbonsMusic

Жыл бұрын

well.. 6 mono sends..or 3 stereo sends.. I use in ears in stereo. Bus 5/6 linked (aux outs 5/6 to in ear mixer..)...so technically with this hack above, you could get 5 stereo sends.

@HiFi.Samurai

9 ай бұрын

you can indeed link the bus outputs to be stereo on the app

@atlasmusic3641

8 ай бұрын

@DebbieDoesMalice As in the Ultranet bus outputs? In total with the MR18 (6 outputs) & the DN416-O (16 outputs) should there not be 11 stereo mixes available?

Do you know why when I mute a channel on the xr18 it also mutes the channel on the DN4816? I switched the outputs to "input" instead of "input+mute"

@danielkharrat

6 күн бұрын

@@AndyGeroldMusic what are you sending to the dn4816?

@AndyGeroldMusic

6 күн бұрын

@danielkharrat I'm sending 14 channels to it. I have an input box that gets the drum and guitar inputs etc...that snake goes to the xr18 inputs. When I go to the routing page for the ultranet outputs I set each output to "input" on the iPad. I did see on the PC mixer that there is option for "analog" and was wondering if that might be the solution

@danielkharrat

6 күн бұрын

@@AndyGeroldMusic yes analog is whatever you plug physically to the mixer

@AndyGeroldMusic

6 күн бұрын

@danielkharrat so if I switch it to "analog" and I mute the channel I should still here it from the DN4816?

@danielkharrat

6 күн бұрын

@@AndyGeroldMusic yes

Add more input in Xair 16 please???

@danielkharrat

5 ай бұрын

If you sacrifice fx returns channels you can change the input of these to usb 1-2, usb 3-4, usb 5-6... So you can have an extra 4 stereo inputs coming from your computer But you cannot add analog inputs

@branbroken

5 ай бұрын

The only simple option for adding more imputs to the xr16 other than upgrading is adding a sub mixer, its not ideal but works. You feed the main outs from your sub mixer to a pair of imputs on the xr16 as the main mixer, you should try to group items (eg drum mics) on the sub mixer since they arent seperate but get fed in to your main as a stereo mix but depending on your setup its workable, and can be cheaper if you already have another small mixer knocking about rather than upgrading the whole mixer to a larger one with more inputs.

There's no way to mix the signal when you have multiple signals on a particular Ultranet buss. It's all the same signal strength - no way to get a custom monitor mic with this. The only way this will work on an MR18 is for 16 descrete channels going to FOH - it's basically a splitter snake.

@jgfakjshfdgkajshd

11 ай бұрын

if you want to mix, you need a P16-M, not that unit

whats the difrence effect and fx

@danielkharrat

5 ай бұрын

Effect is the effect bus Fx is the return channel from the effect

@andym7333

5 ай бұрын

can u record with the ultranet to another computer? cause using usb for interface

@danielkharrat

5 ай бұрын

@@andym7333 no

so basically you're running the FOH with no reverbs or FX"s. Why would you do that???

@danielkharrat

11 ай бұрын

I'm not doing that. I'm saying that if you need 10 monitor mixes you can do that. It's a possibility

You are the winner of the However World Championship! :D

PLEASE!!!!!!! Find a way to get extra inputs

@danielkharrat

Жыл бұрын

Unfortunately, that is not possible. You cannot expand the inputs on the mr18

@edsonsimpson283

Жыл бұрын

@@danielkharrat 🙁

@bkauff00

Жыл бұрын

You could always get an xr12 and run out of that into a channel on the 18. You would just need a tablet for each.

@amilkarsalas

6 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/fIVh0rypm6zXl7g.html&ab_channel=ANDR%C3%89SMART%C3%8DNEZSEMP%C3%89RTEGUI