Accelerator Science: Why RF?

Ғылым және технология

Particle accelerators can fire beams of subatomic particles at near the speed of light. The accelerating force is generated using radio frequency technology and a whole lot of interesting features. In this video, Fermilab’s Dr. Don Lincoln explains how it all works.

Пікірлер: 110

  • @antonypalmer2815
    @antonypalmer28155 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for such a clear explanation. I work on a particle accelerator and your explanation will really help me explain to others how our system works.

  • @BiswajitBhattacharjee-up8vv
    @BiswajitBhattacharjee-up8vvАй бұрын

    What a experimental module .Doping with RF. Fermilab is the heart and soul of physics at high standard .Each and every laboratory is world Bank of experience and physics and friction. Many people have their's own . A lesson I have learnt in electron spectroscopy.

  • @vothaison
    @vothaison5 жыл бұрын

    "We call these groups of particle .. a bunch" 🤔 Meanwhile Apple calls its LCD "Liquid Retina".

  • @h7opolo
    @h7opolo7 жыл бұрын

    It's a scintillating intro into a fascinating exploitation of physics.

  • @qwertyca

    @qwertyca

    5 жыл бұрын

    I see what you did there...

  • @SahinKupusoglu
    @SahinKupusoglu7 жыл бұрын

    Dr. Don Lincoln rocks! 11!!!

  • @eidolor

    @eidolor

    5 жыл бұрын

    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Lincoln He’s actually pretty well respected, that’s part of the reason why they have him as the face of these

  • @mezzoedbey3802
    @mezzoedbey38025 жыл бұрын

    As an Electrical and Electronics engineering student, I'm very fascinated by your videos. Well done Fermilab especially yo Dr. Don Lincoln.

  • @maxvalsaez
    @maxvalsaez7 жыл бұрын

    man particle physics is really awesome

  • @apurbabiswas7218
    @apurbabiswas72187 жыл бұрын

    Great video. Lots of information delivered perfectly. Helpful animations too. Thanks Fermilab

  • @shadow404atl
    @shadow404atl7 жыл бұрын

    Another great video. Very intuitive presentation. Thank you!

  • @cosmosgato
    @cosmosgato7 жыл бұрын

    No one make physics more accessible then Dr. Don Lincoln. This guy is one of the greatest teacher ever.

  • @Stilllife1999
    @Stilllife19997 жыл бұрын

    Great explanation. This channel needs more exposure.

  • @ddorman365
    @ddorman3657 жыл бұрын

    thank you for the great work you are all doing,Doug.

  • @constpegasus
    @constpegasus7 жыл бұрын

    I really enjoy these videos Mr Lincoln. Please keep them coming. Thank you sir.

  • @ravenous9577
    @ravenous95777 жыл бұрын

    Love this channel and content!

  • @photosinensis
    @photosinensis7 жыл бұрын

    Oh, the amazing things you can do with RF. I love RF. It's my favorite part of the EM spectrum.

  • @jordangraupmann6424

    @jordangraupmann6424

    5 жыл бұрын

    photosinensis my favorite part is the color green

  • @user-rp1jr2qo1k

    @user-rp1jr2qo1k

    5 жыл бұрын

    - . - . - - . -

  • @420MusicFiend
    @420MusicFiend7 жыл бұрын

    Another great video from Dr. Don Gotta love the Spinal Tap shout out lol

  • @GottfriedLeibnizYT
    @GottfriedLeibnizYT7 жыл бұрын

    Wow. I'm an electrical engineer and that amuses me.

  • @maxwellsequation4887

    @maxwellsequation4887

    3 жыл бұрын

    No! Liebniz was a great mathematician

  • @tresajessygeorge210
    @tresajessygeorge210 Жыл бұрын

    THANK YOU... PROFESSOR LINCOLN...!!!

  • @Milm4n0
    @Milm4n07 жыл бұрын

    Nice surfing man, great video! Thanks, keep em coming.

  • @JeffOrford
    @JeffOrford7 жыл бұрын

    Thanks so much for this, I found this vid to be really illustrative and enlightening for me.

  • @sunshineo23
    @sunshineo237 жыл бұрын

    Awesome video!

  • @johnchristian5027
    @johnchristian50277 жыл бұрын

    Nice video guys, you should do more content!

  • @EclipZeMuzik
    @EclipZeMuzik5 жыл бұрын

    wonderful work!!

  • @Bhaumikpk
    @Bhaumikpk Жыл бұрын

    Great explanation. Very useful for understanding. Sir, many thanks.

  • @millamulisha
    @millamulisha7 жыл бұрын

    Should talk a bit about the how the uncertainty principle comes into play when you need to time the RF field in just the right way so that particles are in a well defined position (but consequently ill-defined velocity) at the top of the RF 'arch' so to speak. Good video, thanks!

  • @alamgirkabir7177
    @alamgirkabir71775 жыл бұрын

    Good job Dr L

  • @tomtommyl805
    @tomtommyl8057 жыл бұрын

    You guys are great. !thanks

  • @IndraRiogersa
    @IndraRiogersa5 жыл бұрын

    The explanations very helpful to tell non scientist friends of mine. Thank you !!

  • @romanieo
    @romanieo7 жыл бұрын

    Great job as always Don. I just got back from CERN, I spent a couple of days visiting ATLAS, CMS and CCC. While there, they were running lead ions in the LHC. Hopefully your next video could explain how protons (hydrogen ions) gain mass when accelerated (if you haven't already made a video on this topic.) I never knew how integral RF was to particle acceleration.

  • @romanieo

    @romanieo

    7 жыл бұрын

    Thanks @ScienceNinjaDude. Can you explain your statement, "That relativistic mass thing is one of the more pernicious sillinesses that have crept into our culture."? Or point me to a video or paper that better breaks it down.

  • @oysteinsoreide4323

    @oysteinsoreide4323

    6 жыл бұрын

    romanieo This channel has videos explaining why mass doesn't change. You can search for it.

  • @oysteinsoreide4323

    @oysteinsoreide4323

    6 жыл бұрын

    kzread.info/dash/bejne/foh-w9ealcm6irA.html

  • @alanmarston8612
    @alanmarston86127 жыл бұрын

    Nice. Standard RF power curve.

  • @Dinlitla
    @Dinlitla7 жыл бұрын

    OK...that was cool! Thanks!

  • @6aston6ames
    @6aston6ames7 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for this awesome videos, they make easy what we know than is dificult. But make us to loose the fear to this things.

  • @joncrabb5926
    @joncrabb59262 жыл бұрын

    I have a cousin working on using terahertz frequencies for electron acceleration to work for smaller and more accurate bunches so that industries can be more accurate with the amount of electrons colliding. Found it fascinating so came to this vid.

  • @harryandruschak2843
    @harryandruschak28437 жыл бұрын

    Fascinating!

  • @TheElectra5000
    @TheElectra50002 жыл бұрын

    The deeply obscure and complicated technical term "bunch".

  • @johnedwards1685
    @johnedwards16855 жыл бұрын

    A big coupled-cavity travelling wave tube. Like a radar amplifier valve except absolutely gigantic.

  • @MrGooglevideoviewer
    @MrGooglevideoviewer7 жыл бұрын

    you are awesome! Thank you for the great video :)

  • @guitarans
    @guitarans6 жыл бұрын

    Awesome videos... Thanks.. whats the name og the song at the end?

  • @TheyCallMeNewb
    @TheyCallMeNewb7 жыл бұрын

    Whoa! That must be extraordinarily, exasperatingly, interminably challenging; finding the right field timing. Surf's up.

  • @dexio85
    @dexio857 жыл бұрын

    Hey! Thanks for all the videos so far, this is very interesting stuff. I have a questions if you don't mind. Since the bunch gets accelerated more and more and does this mean that you need to control the phase angles of the RF waves injected into the cavities as the bunch loops around to always allow for this perfect scenario? Also. how big (physically) are the typical cavities and what is the typical frequency of the RF waves. Cheers.

  • @ganjanaut6038

    @ganjanaut6038

    7 жыл бұрын

    +ScienceNinjaDude What does that have to do with readings from frequency? You'd still get a data feed from the loop, if I have a timer running for a car going a lap it wouldn't matter if I used seconds or milliseconds, the loop feed would just be fractioned data when momentum increases.

  • @arashm.1556
    @arashm.15566 жыл бұрын

    FANTASTIC

  • @jpruzc
    @jpruzc4 жыл бұрын

    I have a question, and I hate to ask it here but I can't seem to find the answer. I understand how standing EM waves are created inside the cavity and this is the oscillating electric field that accelerates particles. What I don't understand is the geometry of how these standing waves are created in such a way that the E field points in the direction of the particle's motion. I imagine the standing waves being created in the longitudinal axis (along the length of the cavities), but in this case, the E field would be oscillating vertically and not horizontally. Can somebody please explain? Thanks!

  • @PartVIII
    @PartVIII5 жыл бұрын

    So cheesy. So informative. I can't get enough Dr. Don

  • @thomasqsa
    @thomasqsa4 жыл бұрын

    Is there a way to use a kind of "full bridge rectifier" in order to have the eletric fields only in the desired direction ? I mean, maybe there is no semiconductor that would be suitable for this use, but it would be pretty cool if there was something like this.

  • @hotdrippyglass
    @hotdrippyglass7 жыл бұрын

    Love the shirt !!!!

  • @DicerX
    @DicerX7 жыл бұрын

    Please upload or upscale to 4K. Would honestly love this, youtube's compression makes video's look extremely terrible. Thank you for ally our efforts Doc.

  • @Doping1234
    @Doping12347 жыл бұрын

    So in stable bunches the beam is compressed in the direction of travel. Doesn't this increase the charge density broadening the beam? How is this handled?

  • @WilliamLeeSims
    @WilliamLeeSims7 жыл бұрын

    Particle accelerators are dangerous! When you imagined surfing, your shirt changed. Thank goodness we have level-headed physicists working there.

  • @RME76048
    @RME760485 жыл бұрын

    So (budget and space permitting), could a number of accelerators be shifted out of phase relative to each other such that when you wish to have the particles strike a target, they would be combined into a continuous beam as opposed to a single accelerator providing bunches of particles with gaps between?

  • @Frankyjones1000
    @Frankyjones10007 жыл бұрын

    Good ole surf on Michigan lake in december!

  • @taufanaugusta8884
    @taufanaugusta88844 жыл бұрын

    So this is the reason we can have 2 particles moves in different direction within 1 circular collider. Those RF dictate, "you accelerate to the right, and you the left, let me know if you guys meet each other"

  • @husseinmoussa-sd5es
    @husseinmoussa-sd5es4 ай бұрын

    Hello, Dr. Can you make a video to explain crab cavity ?

  • @LowellBoggs
    @LowellBoggs4 жыл бұрын

    Resonance is used to speed up particles. Could it be used to amplify gravitational waves? For example, amplifying the miniscule waves generated by wiggling atoms into macroscopic -- and presumably useful values?

  • @SimonSozzi7258
    @SimonSozzi72584 жыл бұрын

    So is the particle gun shooting like a strobe?

  • @mitzvahgolem8366
    @mitzvahgolem83667 жыл бұрын

    Like period of vibration? Or period of oscillation of the RF field? Can a RF field be boosted by another RF field behind it essentially doubling the push ? שלום

  • @advance_sci_tech_SK_IITBombay
    @advance_sci_tech_SK_IITBombay2 жыл бұрын

    This is TM01 type of cavity. Cavity can have different modes but we prefer TM01.

  • @marklandgraf7667
    @marklandgraf76673 жыл бұрын

    How long does it typically take to accelerate a particle to speed? How long does it typically stay in the beam before being collided?

  • @marklandgraf7667

    @marklandgraf7667

    3 жыл бұрын

    Questions answered in "Accelerator Science: Circular vs. Linear"

  • @akashdas-pp3ko
    @akashdas-pp3ko4 жыл бұрын

    is it klystron with velocity modulation ?

  • @johnnycash4034

    @johnnycash4034

    2 жыл бұрын

    Even klystrons have variable frequency. I think these just have a very broadband due to the size.

  • @nanak3363
    @nanak33637 жыл бұрын

    WOW !

  • @jonathanjackson7047
    @jonathanjackson7047 Жыл бұрын

    This is not the reason we use RF to accelerate particles. There is some advantage to resonance when using a standing wave cavity. But there are many disadvantages of using RF.. energy spread of the particles, duty factor, heating and resonance matching etc. We would prefer to use DC voltages if we could. The problem with DC is arcing. This limits DC voltages and its something like 10kV per cm. Consequently, our accelerating gradient maximum is something like 1 MeV/m. THe largest van der graaf is 7MeV and is quite big. RF cavities can achieve much higher gradients on the order of 10's of MeV/m. This was the motivation to move from VanDerGraf type accelerators to RF cavities.

  • @juffowuppy
    @juffowuppy5 жыл бұрын

    radical!

  • @brilwiljeff
    @brilwiljeff6 жыл бұрын

    I'm looking for the video that explains how a torrent of photons create the appearance of a coherent wave.

  • @CaptainManic2010
    @CaptainManic20107 жыл бұрын

    just blows my mind that a bunch of wankers got together and worked this all out. It's unbelievable. The thousands of minds and hours that went into getting the large accelerators to work....and the fact that they do...is awesome. Thanks so much for your time Don. You explained it so well to the layman.

  • @rickb6029
    @rickb60295 жыл бұрын

    it's dangerous to surf into an oncoming wave... you become the fixed target.

  • @WDIO-RADIO
    @WDIO-RADIO2 жыл бұрын

    nice.

  • @gabetower
    @gabetower7 жыл бұрын

    Tubular!

  • @EdgarSoaresPT
    @EdgarSoaresPT7 жыл бұрын

    Hopefully no excuse is required for that Hawaiian shirt.

  • @sunshineo23
    @sunshineo237 жыл бұрын

    I wish I could double like it

  • @betaneptune
    @betaneptune5 жыл бұрын

    How can a particle bunch have not a single charge in it? Aren't we accelerating charged particles? How would you even accelerate a neutral particle?

  • @negiamerica

    @negiamerica

    3 жыл бұрын

    I think he meant that the bunch does not contain one charged particle but many charged particles

  • @japhetozogbuda725
    @japhetozogbuda7255 жыл бұрын

    does this mean that radio signals can be made stronger using particle accelerator?

  • @johnnycash4034

    @johnnycash4034

    2 жыл бұрын

    Three years later. Yes. It's called a klystron.

  • @betaneptune
    @betaneptune4 жыл бұрын

    Did I hear you right? Bunches don't contain a single charge particle? If there's no charge, how can an electric field accelerate it?

  • @negiamerica

    @negiamerica

    3 жыл бұрын

    I think he meant that they do not contain one charged particle but many charged particles.

  • @betaneptune
    @betaneptune4 жыл бұрын

    Why are you suring into the big wave? You should be riding it, moving in the same direction as it.

  • @1Reevee
    @1Reevee6 жыл бұрын

    Would a spark really form in a vacuum?

  • @johnklapp9077

    @johnklapp9077

    5 жыл бұрын

    There aren't perfect vacuums ... the protons of the beam, for example.

  • @robertlunsford1350
    @robertlunsford13506 жыл бұрын

    Very similar to how our accelerators work for radiation therapy.

  • @nasalimbu3078
    @nasalimbu30782 жыл бұрын

    Platinum shrin Beam accelerator ray thylimil Ti give power to sun on metal

  • @osvaldoferreira7136
    @osvaldoferreira71367 жыл бұрын

    I would like to translate some of the videos to my birth language, portuguese. I would love to share this materials with my friends, but they don't speak english... Why don't you guys allow translations?

  • @TheUSCMS

    @TheUSCMS

    7 жыл бұрын

    Osvaldo Ferreira I think they do.

  • @osvaldoferreira7136

    @osvaldoferreira7136

    7 жыл бұрын

    No, they dont. Go in settings/subtitles, there are no option to add new subs.

  • @gorkemvids4839
    @gorkemvids48395 жыл бұрын

    Surfing on em wave huh? Pretty sure its cooler than water surfers

  • @YCCCm7
    @YCCCm77 жыл бұрын

    Why not just make 10 louder?

  • @Fury6

    @Fury6

    6 жыл бұрын

    ...but this one goes to 11.

  • @eidolor

    @eidolor

    5 жыл бұрын

    It doesn’t count until it’s over 9000 and shatters strong force

  • @GEOindustries0
    @GEOindustries07 жыл бұрын

    "None more black"

  • @StainedShuriken333
    @StainedShuriken3337 жыл бұрын

    You are approached by a frenzied Vault scientist, who yells, "I'm going to put my quantum harmonizer in your photonic resonation chamber!" What's your response?

  • @johnnycash4034

    @johnnycash4034

    2 жыл бұрын

    A high frequency response

  • @yourstruely9896
    @yourstruely98964 жыл бұрын

    A group of particle physicist a bunch

  • @ahmedomar6806
    @ahmedomar68065 жыл бұрын

    😭😭

  • @AnhThu-jh6ih
    @AnhThu-jh6ih5 жыл бұрын

    Lp

  • @daveb5041
    @daveb50416 жыл бұрын

    11 exists in professional sports too. In an interview with the new england patriot's running back on how he scored the super bowl winning touchdown he explains that he gave it 110%. The next year when they lost the superbowl the same player gave reasons why they lost but he never said he gave it 110%. I actually made up that story because I couldn't name any of the players but watch any sports interview ever and the winning team/player will always say how they gave it 110% but only when they won. Whats the real reason? If there is one the players certainly don't know.

  • @zaiks0105
    @zaiks01056 жыл бұрын

    I still don't get it ... at least I am honest ;)

  • @PrivateSi
    @PrivateSi5 жыл бұрын

    Sounds like the world's messiest experiment using the worlds most precise equipment and understanding of physics.. They smash so many particles together so quickly at such close range due to this bunching I'm not convinced of (all of) the experiment results.

  • @whirledpeas3477
    @whirledpeas34772 жыл бұрын

    Particle physics is worth a video or 2, please explain why it is worth more 🤔. Idiots please reply

  • @foxlinx
    @foxlinx7 жыл бұрын

    The only part that gave me hope was when these guy said that the cavities "prefer". I hope they leave old and stupid dogmas like fields... gl

  • @ruby_gleyzes
    @ruby_gleyzes4 жыл бұрын

    Awesome video!

  • @rickb6029
    @rickb60295 жыл бұрын

    it's dangerous to surf into an oncoming wave... you become the fixed target.

Келесі