A Serious Challenge to Quantum Mechanics and its Implications.

Summary: The beam-split coincidence test is famous for showing the particle property of light. Eric claims to have uniquely performed that test with gamma-rays and alpha-rays to reveal how quantization in space fails. His many versions of this test, plus his theory and historical analysis support an accumulation-threshold model. Historical objections to that model will be addressed. Thresholds upon emission and absorption give the illusion of quantized probabilistic particles.
Here are the lecture slides: drive.google.com/file/d/1U5Fk...
It is recommended to view these slides ahead of time.
Please refer to Eric's web sites and videos: www.thresholdmodel.com and • The Gamma-Ray Threshol...
Speaker: Eric Reiter is a lifelong independent researcher and inventor. He studied physics at California State University. His published papers include those in Progress in Physics, Physics Essays, and the 2015 SPIE What are Photons? Conference Proceedings. Videos of past presentations, a video of the experiment • The Gamma-Ray Threshol... , and all writings are posted at www.thresholdmodel.com
Moderator representatives: Quantum AI Foundation

Пікірлер: 6

  • @BiswajitBhattacharjee-up8vv
    @BiswajitBhattacharjee-up8vv11 күн бұрын

    I am very delighted seeing your presentation of experiments and those conclusion on the basis of Plank's another vision on his mathematical model of hf ,as you extended as threshold. Inverse of wavefunction collapse means generation of wavefunction below the h, a small energy wave packet. And their pile up The 2nd points that is very catchy that Bell's logic of quantum entanglement of states experimentally lose it's significance. The preloaded concepts is naturally reverse the ground state emission. In also support the tunneling pre loaded states in quantised levels. And the ratio of some quantity is the logic of your threshold theory is as good as pileup model is indeed very remarkable and matches my theoretical proves of my self developed model theory. In your quest of why factor 4 × chance instead of 1× as it is in QM .As you have also pointed self quantization of frequency is different in energy , very rightly . Let's consider Kb×T Kb = Boltzmman constant . T = Relativistic temperature = 1/(2pi×r) By definition Kb = KE /T Dirac has define h = pi/2 ( C×Mp×Rp) Get (Kb)p : where p@ proton Do same for ( Kb) Planck. The ratio = 4 I have proved same for other ratio. Congratulations I have similar understanding of fundamental of nature. In other Relativistic means I have a threshold conditions of 4 × ,also some quantization parameters.

  • @ericreiter1

    @ericreiter1

    Күн бұрын

    4 is just for that one test. I see above chance up to 2000x on different ways to test.

  • @SpotterVideo
    @SpotterVideo8 күн бұрын

    What do the Twistors of Roger Penrose and the Hopf Fibrations of Eric Weinstein and the "Belt Trick" of Paul Dirac have in common? In Spinors it takes two complete turns to get down the "rabbit hole" (Alpha Funnel 3D--->4D) to produce one twist cycle (1 Quantum unit). Can both Matter and Energy be described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature? (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Mass= 1/Length, with each twist cycle of the 4D Hypertube proportional to Planck’s Constant. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) If quarks have not been isolated and gluons have not been isolated, how do we know they are not parts of the same thing? The tentacles of an octopus and the body of an octopus are parts of the same creature. Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. The "Color Force" is a consequence of the XYZ orientation entanglement of the twisted tubules. The two twisted tubule entanglement of Mesons is not stable and unwinds. It takes the entanglement of three twisted tubules to produce the stable proton.

  • @LaboriousCretin
    @LaboriousCretin15 күн бұрын

    Good lecture and materials. Thank you for sharing. Do you know if anyone has tried metamaterials for a slit and manipulating the defraction gradient? Nice to see gama results and cutoffs and such. I wonder if he would like quantum islands or degenerate matter reduced to plank. But thats a side question and not really on topic. Has anyone looked into EM guidance and lensing? Or using defraction gradients to look for clues. Rainbows and metamaterials and slits and beam splitting. Keep up the good work, and thank you for sharing.

  • @tuk7raz
    @tuk7raz3 күн бұрын

    ❤ Where is your nobility? Where is the honor? Where is the support? Where is the scientific interest and curiosity? BIG ERROR in measuring the Universe, black holes, dark energy,... Let me judge all this by the result of a direct experiment, gentlemen of physics Let's do the Michelson-Morley experiment on a school bus and determine the speed in a straight line - this is exactly the experiment Einstein dreamed of. Perhaps we will see the postulates: “Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and Dominant gravitational fields control the speed of light in a vacuum.” There is a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, two coils with optical fiber, where the light in each arm travels 18,000 meters, without exceeding the parameters of 0.4/0.4/0.4 meters and mass - 4 kg.

Келесі