The key point is that whilst scientific discoveries in physics do not *prove* that everything 'woo-woo' is actually true, those discoveries are *consistent with the idea* that at least some of this 'woo woo' may actually be true.

oh wooow - Don lives also outside of Fermilab. Love it❤

@drsjamesserra

11 күн бұрын

😂

@JohnDoe-rm1kw

10 күн бұрын

How did he manage to escape fermilab? 🤣🤣

@bennylloyd-willner9667

9 күн бұрын

​@@JohnDoe-rm1kw easy, The two Dons just spin in the opposite direction and no one notices the Don at Fermilab is spinning the other direction than normal. Simple particle physics 😊

Pretty sure announcing the earth was round rather than flat was pretty woo woo back in the day.

Don you rock! Thank you for this explanation of what is going on right here now in the world. We have been needing this, urgently.

Thanks for pointing out that Great confusion arises when we take well-defined physics terms and use them in colloquial language To try and validate mystical hypotheses.

@liamweavers9291

15 сағат бұрын

Colloquial language that predates the science that proves it 😂

Language we use is limiting ~ Science will make a great circle back into what spiritualality of indigenous knew & practiced in energy form or how utilize fields for .....

@TheBeatle49

Күн бұрын

I guess you disagree with the speaker. Correct me if I am wrong.

very interesting and VERY nicely explained. thank you!

All I needed to know 🙏🏻🕊

This is one of the funniest things I've watched in ages. Thank you, Don Lincoln for showing how blind the scientific community can be. Thousands of years of ancient wisdom told you that this was the case, but when you prove it to be the case, you suggest that your science is being hijacked by woo woo 😂

This entire reality assists in making whatever anyone believes comes true and the difficult fact to actknowledge is that it's only for the persons that believe in that belief it's as a gift that nature gave to humans as an remote controlled perceivable mechanism

@TheBeatle49

Күн бұрын

Rephrase please, that was kind of obscure.

@joblo497

Күн бұрын

​@@TheBeatle49 i never metanoia I didn't like ❤

Don is a fantastic science communicator. Which is why it pains me so to see him struggle to effectively explain these concepts to this audience. It seems like he’s unprepared or just not in the right mood. I guess we all have our days.

Nice ❤

Thanks! More stuff for me to learn. -Why an individual field for each particle? Surely some of the fields would be just manifestations. -empty space ain't, role of quantum foam on fields and particles.

If fields are everywhere, does that include outside the current area in which our universe exists? If our universe is an expanding bubble, do the fields already exist in the region we are expanding "into"? Or do fields expand? If so do they expand by stretching or multiplication?

@TheBeatle49

Күн бұрын

My understanding is that space itself is expanding. That there is no region outside of space.

@glenncurry3041

Күн бұрын

@@TheBeatle49 Yes the current theory is Universe expansion. But I am not aware of any claims to know what might exist outside the bounds of our universe that we are "expanding into". Expansion would either require the field(s) exists we are expanding into or the field is stretching with the expansion (which would weaken the local field energy as it stretched), or new field of same density is being created with the expansion.

@MizJanice

17 сағат бұрын

Excellent question! Made my brain hurt 😁 ....love it!

Eddy currents seem to highlight the common denominator to all action, reciprocity of opposites and also periodicity, or closed loops of action, and like a fractal, more closed loops within a given closed loop. The meta-relationships of standing waves, and how nearly static natural forms can be found within the proportions of standing waves and harmonic relations, speaks to the reason why mysticism overlaps with physics. Look at the Rosslyn Chapel standing wave figures, like the standing wave figures formed when a vibrating plate is sprinkled with sand. Literally the breath of god, vibration of periodic form, causing static form. This transform, in different numbers of dimensions and expressions, is likely where all the action is situated, just like how eddy currents form closed loops of periodic opposites. Superconducors can use eddy current to levitate a magnet, because there are no energy losses, this feels like how matter manifests; each atom is ether a superconductor-like perpetual motion, or is somehow re-fed energy from an outside source, like the pilot wave theory based on vibrating silicone droplets. The vibration keeps them existing and bouncing for a very long time. Particle-wave behavior, like eddy currents in 3d and nested epicyclic structures, might be knowable without actually seeing them, it might take a creative computer model parametric sandbox search for interesting phenomena at certain assumptions and sub-assumptions. The top people should be able to search a very large combinational space by sticking to known principles, boundaries,, and constants. I would look for a trifecta of nested relationships based on a common theme, as a minimum trigger threshold. I would start with relativistic eddy current math, resonant 3d field models with relativity taken into account. We are likely missing something big, but at least such pursuits would lead to hints on what principle might be missing from consideration.

@craigstiferbig

5 күн бұрын

Superfluous and harmonic phase wave pressurized, superchilled neutrino permiable field set - essentially a QCD bifurcate, relative in phase reordering, neutrino ocean in strange attractions via pulsation casting, resonant, electromagnetic, dual wave to particle point electron pairs in convergence - skirting, tunneling in Vortexing frequencies, assimilate to navier stokes actions, producing refractional spaces and eddy to neutrino phase flow - engulfing, and vertexing turbulence to slipstreaming magnetosphere concentrations, with evolutions inverse in perception to entropic wave sets, and making inertial gains in Von Karman Vortex streets with orbital exchanges in oppositely oriented electron pairs helixing needlecasting pulsation streams/beams as they collide resonant transversals at neutrino phase pressure points of superpositional synaptic weaves, imparting through quarks as they flip in magnetic momentum around atomic nuclei and carry out phase states in quantum tunneling current paths of frequency evolutions... maybe 🤷‍♂️ A neutrino ocean fluid dynamic qcd imparted phase wave congruence as a dual mechanical relative spacetime system.. both sides resonant, but basically inverse to eachother.. evolving in spight of one another, reinforcing eachother as a closed field reaction, whether the boundary is the end of mass and energy phases or simply encasing or universe and parallel planes, or entire dimensional sets.. a simple solution allowing special and general theories of relativity and gravity as displacement

27:20 what was donn showing with the “gizmo”???

too many ads!... but good lecture

The electrical properties of free space seem like they cause refraction and then reflection of energy at increasing frequencies, this could explain all particle formations perhaps. Light can escape atoms because it is less-reflected than the higher frequencies found in say, electrons, and finds an opportunistic window proportional to its wavelength.

What we need to do is place all these different fields into a working structure, a process that form temporal existence. A one-way process with potential photon ∆E=hf energy, of what might happen, exchanging into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons. Kinetic energy is the energy of motion of what is actually happening. This forms an irreversible probabilistic process with an uncertain future coming into existence photon by photon with the absorption and emission of light waves.

OK I had to watch a second time to under the difference of what he is saying and what the so-called mystics are saying. I understand that our words aren't perfect, and Don does say the words he is saying, and the words the mystics are saying are the same, and he implies they are different in meaning. I think I would enjoy a video explaining what he he believes is the difference. This is a mystery to me.

@raycar1165

7 күн бұрын

- Ric Flair approaches - The words are the same the concepts are the same but in practice anything on the other side of the metaphysical tracks is to be ridiculed into oblivion and forever known as “Woo”.

Loved your intro warning about possible woo woo misinterpretations. Which is exactly why I thought the title was click bait that successfully dragged me in! Then I see Don and.... it's going to be all right!

@seabud6408

3 күн бұрын

Read “The Science Delusion” by research biologist Dr Rupert Sheldrake, which is his reply to “The God delusion” by, of course, the biologist/geneticist Dr Richard Dawkins. Consciousness is the other side of the coin 🪙 that is life. No one knows how chemistry 🧪 became conscious 🧬 🐸 . biology… Google it. No one. Dr Dawkins assumes that the Universe is and was, a dead unconscious mechanical entity. However any physicist will tell you that there are no particles only fields .. and that there is ultimately only one field of energy .. The unified quantum field .. which IS what the Uni-verse .. IS. What no physicist (if he/she is also a materialist) will tell you, is that you can show that Life and consciousness are intrinsic qualities of this field … which IS everything. Ask yourself if you are alive and conscious. As you are continuous with this field .. this means that life and consciousness must be qualities of this field .. which you are inseparable from. The Universe is a nested holon just like the human body m, which it is continuous with. (nested atoms, cells, molecules, organs, body-organism - nested in the environment… The Earth 🌍 … The Universe ) Atom/energy .. to molecule, to Cell to 🥚 to 🐣 to 🐓 Big Bang 💥 .. to super hot expanding plasma .. to 💨 gas to stars ✨ to black holes 🕳️ galaxies, planets 🪐 🌍 … seas 🌊 cells 🦠 and animals 🐸 💃🏽 Einstein, Dali, Disney and Mickey 🐭 Same process … growth .. AND .. evolution. Scientists deny that the Universe has GROWN in that common sense sense … because it can’t be organismic .. can’t be alive. That is just the assumption part of the guiding dogma that is … materialism. the Universe appears to be eternally cyclic (living and dying and living being born again .. like us) Sir Roger Penrose (Nobel Laureate) has a theory regarding cyclic cosmology and a theory of how the brain may mediate consciousness via quantum processes in the brain 🧠. He does not have any theory as to what consciousness IS (No one does) .. adding “Perhaps in 500 years time, we will be able to make a start on that” Evolutionary theory has nothing to say about the only real mysteries .. outlined above. Materialism - “Give us one free “miracle” and we’ll explain the rest”? If interested please read “The Science Delusion” by research biologist Dr Rupert Sheldrake … this was his reply to Dr Dawkins book .. “The God Delusion” Also .. The Tao of Physics by particle physicist Dr Fritjof Capra. Deep Physics/deep perennial philosophy. (Materialism would just say deep woo .. of course)

He's like that one: "I'm not saying it was the aliens .... but it was the aliens"

2 electrons repel eachother, what is the repelingness constructed of and how is the motive force imparted? what is the mechanism that causes the movement?

@lucascritchi

13 күн бұрын

I think they are imparting photons. Photon is the gauge boson of the electromagnetic force.

@InterdimensionalWiz

13 күн бұрын

@@lucascritchi so,what is it carrying, if it isn't mass?(photons are massless,yes?)and how does it deliver it's payload? what mechanism does that payload trigger that causes movement in the object?

@lucascritchi

13 күн бұрын

@@InterdimensionalWiz that’s correct, photons are massless. Photons are the force carrier particles that transmit the electromagnetic force. Electrons interchange photons each other. Particles also has a property called spin which I believe it make them a little magnet. Photon is a elementary particle of the standard model, a force carrier particle. (One of the 4 gauge bosons known) If you are asking what is a photon or where it came from, well, in that case I don’t know. I think nobody knows that. 😆

@InterdimensionalWiz

13 күн бұрын

@@lucascritchi Best answer yet! Tesla was into Radient Energy coming from spark gaps... then of course 'the Aether'so is a photon a waving particle,or a particulating wave? an interdimentional bump thing that lights up in the dark... ?

@InterdimensionalWiz

13 күн бұрын

@@lucascritchi what is a magnetic field made of?what mechanism causes attraction and repulsion?

❤

👍👍

If a water molecule is .0000003 mm in size it takes a lot more than 3000 side by side to make a mm?

@americanninja9163

14 күн бұрын

he did say meter, however picture shows mm

@phaseencode4911

13 күн бұрын

It would take 3 million to make a millimeter, and 3 billion to make a meter

@americanninja9163

13 күн бұрын

@@phaseencode4911 I believe he meant 3*10^-7 m which is the same as 3*10^-4 mm. So if u multiply that with 3000 it equals approx. 1mm. It is not correct but it is an honest mistake.

@kennethreese2193

10 күн бұрын

Its easy to make stupid mistakes like that when you are speaking in front of an entire room like that. Its also much harder to correct yourself on the fly. Obviously, he knows because he is correctly rattling off other large numbers.

There are many descriptions in the 5th Canto of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam about places to which we have no immediate access. This begs the question: What is the mechanism which prevents us from perceiving these worlds? One such possibility could be that standard human senses can only pick up information within a limited range of guṇa combinations. To formalize this idea, a sketch of a phenomenological mathematical model will be presented based on certain assumptions. The purpose of this sketch is to show possible research avenues for developing a proper mathematical model that can describe intuitive notions of Sāṅkhya philosophy as more information becomes available concerning the nature of these apparently inaccessible worlds. At the heart of the sketch is a tantalizing similarity between certain elements of Sāṅkhya and quantum fields, as suggested by Akhandadhi in his “Atma Paradigm” presentations. We will touch upon the collapse of the wave-function, the influence of the guṇas, and the connection between the elements of Sāṅkhya and atoms as described in Vaiśeṣika philosophy.

So, everything that exists is in reality a vibrating and invisible field, yet this, claims Dr. Lincoln, has absolutely nothing to with 'metaphysics'. I don't know about you, but the concept of totally invisible, vibrating fields that permeate everywhere and everything across the entire Universe, and create everything that exists ... sounds pretty metaphysical to me.

@erichodge567

2 күн бұрын

The difference between physics and metaphysics comes down to your mistaken use of the word, "invisible". It is true, for example, that our eyes cannot see radio waves, but every middling physics department in the world has a device that will give out precisely the same answer for the frequency of a given source of radio waves. The apparatus makes the invisible, visible. Metaphysical investigations do not work this way. In fact, when a metaphysical method starts giving repeatable, consistent, and observable results, we just call it science.

@richardoldfield6714

2 күн бұрын

@@erichodge567 Measuring frequency does not, contrary to your claim, make "the invisible, visible". It merely makes some aspects of some field-vibrations measurable .. big difference. The plain fact is that philosophical physicalism leads to a never ending series of logical causation questions: what caused the cause of the cause? And then, what caused the cause of that cause? ... etc etc. It's thus an approach that can never realistically hope to uncover ultimate truths about reality.

@TheBeatle49

Күн бұрын

I don't believe physicists are claiming anything like that. Remember Son himself said that 100 years from now there will likely be another iteration of physics, and in 200 another, . .

@richardoldfield6714

Күн бұрын

@@TheBeatle49 It's what Dr. Lincoln claims in the video (i.e. that metaphysics has nothing to do with fact that everything which exists stems from vibrating and invisible fields) - and that's what my comment refers to.

@MizJanice

17 сағат бұрын

It's difficult to wrap the mind around the idea.... it's incredibly complex and we understand the tiniest fraction of these concepts. We should not dismiss the "woo" as ridiculous. There is a lot of science backing up many of the so-called woo ideas. See PEAR labs at Princeton for some really good examples.

"All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particles of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. The mind is the matrix of matter." Max Planck, theoretical physicist

@seabud6408

3 күн бұрын

You may have read “The Science Delusion” by research biologist Dr Rupert Sheldrake, which is his reply to “The God delusion” by, of course, the biologist/geneticist Dr Richard Dawkins. Consciousness is the other side of the coin 🪙 that is life. No one knows how chemistry 🧪 became conscious 🧬 🐸 . biology… Google it. No one. Dr Dawkins assumes that the Universe is and was, a dead unconscious mechanical entity. However any physicist will tell you that there are no particles only fields .. and that there is ultimately only one field of energy .. The unified quantum field .. which IS what the Uni-verse .. IS. What no physicist (if he/she is also a materialist) will tell you, is that you can show that Life and consciousness are intrinsic qualities of this field … which IS everything. Ask yourself if you are alive and conscious. As you are continuous with this field .. this means that life and consciousness must be qualities of this field .. which you are inseparable from. The Universe is a nested holon just like the human body m, which it is continuous with. (nested atoms, cells, molecules, organs, body-organism - nested in the environment… The Earth 🌍 … The Universe ) Atom/energy .. to molecule, to Cell to 🥚 to 🐣 to 🐓 Big Bang 💥 .. to super hot expanding plasma .. to 💨 gas to stars ✨ to black holes 🕳️ galaxies, planets 🪐 🌍 … seas 🌊 cells 🦠 and animals 🐸 💃🏽 Einstein, Dali, Disney and Mickey 🐭 Same process … growth .. AND .. evolution. Scientists deny that the Universe has GROWN in that common sense sense … because it can’t be organismic .. can’t be alive. That is just the assumption part of the guiding dogma that is … materialism. the Universe appears to be eternally cyclic (living and dying and living being born again .. like us) Sir Roger Penrose (Nobel Laureate) has a theory regarding cyclic cosmology and a theory of how the brain may mediate consciousness via quantum processes in the brain 🧠. He does not have any theory as to what consciousness IS (No one does) .. adding “Perhaps in 500 years time, we will be able to make a start on that” Evolutionary theory has nothing to say about the only real mysteries .. outlined above. Materialism - “Give us one free “miracle” and we’ll explain the rest”? If interested please read “The Science Delusion” by research biologist Dr Rupert Sheldrake … this was his reply to Dr Dawkins book .. “The God Delusion” Also .. The Tao of Physics by particle physicist Dr Fritjof Capra. Deep Physics/deep perennial philosophy. (Materialism would just say deep woo .. of course)

Physicists who do physics > mathematicians who do physics

impenetrable??Too right. It is accessible though.

Don, the information density of your talk is rather low. However, you seem more natural and relaxed in front of a live audience than you do in your science videos.

Science is NOT different from conventional religions. The latter want us to believe GOD is everywhere because the priests say so, while the scientists want us to believe FIELD is everywhere because they say so.

@TheBeatle49

Күн бұрын

No it's because their existence is detectable and falsifiable. BTW, if you buy a GPS based on religious doctrine it will not work.

If someone has been using a word before Don did, then he is using their words. Don is hijacking the woo woo metaphor, not the other way around. Physicists are sloppy in their language then blame others for not understanding.

@TheBeatle49

Күн бұрын

I think physicists have gone a little overboard in some of their naming. But he is right in that "quantum" has been mis-usued by the new age crowd. By the way, "quantum*" was not borrowed from mysticism. Also that the words of the scientists and the same words by the mystics do not mean the same thing. And also, mystics are uncritical in assuming that the words that physicists use must correspond to their own use of the word.

Well on the bright side..if you're not a genius materialist at least you still have mumbo jumbo..lol

Ying yang isn't mysterious, or mystical...it's the balance of an inversely resonant, dual mechanical, liquid phase wave dynamic, wave to particle point resonant casting energetic electron pairs bifurcational to a phase wave harmonically pressurized neutrino ocean.. Vortex streets, strange attractions, permiable transfer, navier stokes assimilate actions, and electromagnetic "magnetosphere" concentrations engulfing neutrinos in refractional space.. together makeup gravity as displacement and reconditioning phase flow, in evolution towards,in spight of one another, skirting their individual entropic properties in a dance of attempts at gain over the other congruence. The superfluous phase dynamic neutrino field, seemingly instantaneous in reordering phase transfers across unlimited distance (and time). The electron pairs set together to create evolving resonation pulsates and exchange oscillation patterning in convergence with superpositional pairs moving inverted through time, at paradoxical pressure points (entanglements of pulsation weaves applying dimensional synaptic bridging under superpositional rippling at convergent concentrations and impact orientations). Their exchange continues atomic nuclei spinors in wave concentrations of harmonic vertices/vortices in polar pulsation turbine excitations of cymatic energy spheres engulfing neutrino harmonics. Pulsate ripples in congruence as wave casts at their refractional tips where electrons orbit and flip guiding expansion of space-time in resonant evolving pulsation casting wave density held in by slipstreaming neutrino phase, transversing out through the neutrino ocean in harmonic beams from quasars at the center of every galaxy.

@marcariotto1709

9 күн бұрын

I've been saying almost exactly the same thing for years. It's nearly self-explanatory once you learn some basic physics and a little maths, but nobody will listen to me😢

@craigstiferbig

9 күн бұрын

@marcariotto1709 because they still think neutrinos are created by nuclear fusion... instead of merely excited out of phase harmony with ourselves locally (relative) ..most of our conceptualization with space-time as a fluidity is confused because we essentially evolved in spaces over curved 2 dimensional assimilate planes - if we were water based intelligent lifeforms, and the oxygen never rose from the oceans, leaving a water world almost completely to orbit, and there wasn't miles of ice separating us from space in such an occasion.. we would likely have understood this concept long before Feynman created probability sets that don't involve direct determinism ( by using passive observations ), and wouldn't be hanging onto a theory, Einstein knew was incomplete and suffered over this - constant - until his passing, in being reinforced locally through many technical processes testing the mathematics successfully approximate } as facts { instead of the highly repeated assumptions of close approximation around ^ and uncertainty principles shrouded in "dark" terminology, which allows the short ordered historically local repetition in successful real world applications

@herrweiss2580

7 күн бұрын

Rubbish 😂

@craigstiferbig

7 күн бұрын

@herrweiss2580 you must mean how you communicate with strangers. Maybe take a time out and try again. We can be better. You can too. Then we'll be better together... try some banana pancakes, maybe. Unless there's a college freshmen physics student that you need to stifle somewhere ( before they prove your next publishing wrong) (better hurry)

@shanebailey9128

6 күн бұрын

Like he said Craig, You’re on your own! I Sincerely Hope you seek some Professional help, be it Psychological or for Drug dependence or Both.👍

It's interesting how keen Dr. Lincoln is to emphasize the non-applicability of the ideas he explores to anything 'metaphysical' - when it's blindingly obvious that some of the ideas do indeed relate very strongly to various 'metaphysical' conceptions. There seems to be a fear among some scientists of anything that contradicts - or might contradict - the philosophical physicalism which they insist, as matter of quasi-religious 'faith', must sit at the root of all explanations. This attitude is not science - it's scientism (including a set of pre-determined cultural assumptions, of which belief in philosophical physicalism is one example).

I can't help but feel that this gentleman would be a much better physicist if he paid for the therapy to heal the hurt he experienced at not being invited to the "cool" table in the cafeteria. Even though it's a simple presentation of general concepts in modern science it is clouded by his psychological immaturity and his need to insult other views. Refuting his perspective and training is too easy to make further mention of here. Only to say: how many quarks compose the desire of the students to eat cheese after the lecture? Surely a causal explanation would need to grant some status to the experience of the eater although the reality of same cannot be measured by any of the particles or forces mentioned. And lastly, what did Einstein experience when he received his greatest insight? Where did such a thought come from? This presenter needs to humble himself with what little he really knows or understands. It's okay, your colleagues won't like you less.

Nothing new. SOSO, 😢

just as arrogant as almost all physicists. First, QT is incomplete, Astronomy is incomplete, despite your beautiful theory. 35+ free arbitrary parameters is not how intellectual beauty could be conceived. Second you completely forget about transcendental conditions. You are just talking about 1 out of four aspects of reality, and that's the (abstract) model. Intellectually faint, I would say.

Very nice speaker, quite wonderfully presented. But the paranoia of being mistaken for being woo is funny. I would speculate he has never spent any time or expended any efforts to see if the woo may have merit. I believe if an honest person looked at all the evidence, one must conclude that science is missing the boat.

@Tricyklist

11 күн бұрын

Science can always be reconstructed entirely from scratch. Burn all the books? Forced global amnesia with an "alien" EMP? Science can be resurrected. Given enough time, intelligence and freedom of thought. Science is not invented. It merely waits patiently and completely indifferently to be described. While a faith dies [forever!] The microsecond there is a break in transmission of corrupted information.

@wisdomugonna6529

10 күн бұрын

🤣🤣

@skyemac8

10 күн бұрын

Life is strange and it reveals itself sometimes as woo an all is fields in reality.

@christopherhamilton3621

10 күн бұрын

Glad to see you qualify your statement with ‘speculate’…😂

@marcariotto1709

9 күн бұрын

Some woo is like some myths and legends in that science is indeed proving them to be facts. There are reasons so many great minds also follow a spiritual path and not simple reductionist materialism.

God

@christopherhamilton3621

10 күн бұрын

😂

@user-ct9dc4zt6h

10 күн бұрын

@@christopherhamilton3621 GOD

Physicists who do physics > mathematicians who do physics