Perspectives on technology trends, market execution, and customer engagement.
More than 70 technology pioneers and market leaders, in virtually every technology segment, have trusted OrionX to help set new break-away strategies, ignite brands, position and launch products, create campaigns, and engage customers for increased market share.
Пікірлер
Isn't this tresholdness basically quantum?
The concept of threshold I am describing will acknowledge lower values of charge action mass: lower values than e h m. We do not see those lower values directly. We will see the sub-threshold nature in the ratios of those constants. My experiment shows there must be such lower values. Quantization denies such a sub-threshold exists.
@@ericreiter1 hum.... interesting... But what's measure isn't still quantized?
Amazing stuff. Good work.
in atomic absorption analysis this is quantized ?
❤ Where is your nobility? Where is the honor? Where is the support? Where is the scientific interest and curiosity? BIG ERROR in measuring the Universe, black holes, dark energy,... Let me judge all this by the result of a direct experiment, gentlemen of physics Let's do the Michelson-Morley experiment on a school bus and determine the speed in a straight line - this is exactly the experiment Einstein dreamed of. Perhaps we will see the postulates: “Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and Dominant gravitational fields control the speed of light in a vacuum.” There is a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, two coils with optical fiber, where the light in each arm travels 18,000 meters, without exceeding the parameters of 0.4/0.4/0.4 meters and mass - 4 kg.
What do the Twistors of Roger Penrose and the Hopf Fibrations of Eric Weinstein and the "Belt Trick" of Paul Dirac have in common? In Spinors it takes two complete turns to get down the "rabbit hole" (Alpha Funnel 3D--->4D) to produce one twist cycle (1 Quantum unit). Can both Matter and Energy be described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature? (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Mass= 1/Length, with each twist cycle of the 4D Hypertube proportional to Planck’s Constant. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) If quarks have not been isolated and gluons have not been isolated, how do we know they are not parts of the same thing? The tentacles of an octopus and the body of an octopus are parts of the same creature. Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. The "Color Force" is a consequence of the XYZ orientation entanglement of the twisted tubules. The two twisted tubule entanglement of Mesons is not stable and unwinds. It takes the entanglement of three twisted tubules to produce the stable proton.
Hello, This may or may not be of interest to you, but I believe that the standard model of quantum mechanis is fundamentally flawed at the level of tha atom. There is a radical, Logical alternative , that may help explain some of the complications you find in your ressearch. The whole description of how the universe began is wrong. as is the standard model of quantum mechanics. It is the misconception that the universe is expanding that has led to many of the problems in cosmology. I contend that the universe is not expanding: It has no age because it has always existed much as it is now: It will exist forever much as it is now: There was no Big Bang or cosmic inflation: The CMBR is not the afterglow of the big bang, but a point where electromagnetic radiation reaches saturation, and Redshift is not due to the expansion of the universe, but is due to the loss of speed and energy of electromagnetic radiation over distance and time it has travelled. There has just been published an hypothesis called ' The Two Monopole Particle Universe ' by ' Tony Norman Marsh ', which fully explains all of this Logically. If you type in Tony Norman Marsh into Google, details will be shown. This hypothesis can also explain Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Antimatter, and two forces of gravity, amongst other things. If you can provide an email address, I can send you a copy of the manuscript. Kind regards, This hypothesis can also explain Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Antimatter, and two forces of gravity, amongst other things. If you can provide an email address, I can send you a copy of the manuscript. Kind regards, Tony Marsh. If I had an email address to reply to, I could send you a copy of the hypothesis, but I have found that KZread will not allow email addresses to be posted on these comments. It is available on Amazon and Kindle. Typing Tony Norman Marsh ' into Google will bring up details. Unfortunately, the hypothesis is too long to post in these comments, however, below is a copy of of the Abstracts from both parts of the hypothesis. Abstract. Sole Author. Tony Norman Marsh. In this hypothesis, I set out to present a radical alternative to the standard model of quantum mechanics and cosmology, based on logic as opposed to mathematics, which could explain the following: Dark Matter: Dark Energy: Antimatter: cosmic nucleosynthesis: and two forces of Gravity. A more rational model of the atom, where the relationship between the nucleus and the electron is fully explained: The speed and ultimate distance that light and all electromagnetic radiation can travel: An alternative explanation for the ‘Cosmic Microwave Background radiation’ and ‘Redshift’: An explanation eliminating the ‘Horizon Problem’ without cosmic inflation: An explanation for an infinite, nonexpanding universe that has always existed, without a ‘Big Bang’: The cornerstone of my hypothesis is that everything that exists in the universe is composed of just two incredibly small monopole particles, which I contend are the only two true fundamental and finitely small particles that exist in the universe. One is a negatively charged monopole particle called a ‘Harveytron’. And the other is a positively charged monopole particle called a ‘Dannytron’. All other particles are composites of these two particles. Abstract. An hypothesis to challenge the idea of the ‘Big Bang‘, being how our universe began, and the idea that the universe is expanding. It is further proposed an alternative explanation for the ‘Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation’ (CMB), and ‘Redshift’. It is proposed that light and all electromagnetic radiation may have a limit to how far it can travel through space. It is also proposed that the universe did not emerge from nothing, but is a dynamic system, in which matter is constantly being created and consumed in a cycle over billions of years. It is proposed that the universe as we observe it has always existed much as it is today, and extends to infinity. It is further proposed that the so-called ‘ Big Bang ‘ was not some kind of massive explosion, but is a misconception of what is being interpreted as the ‘ Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation ‘. The ‘ CMB ‘ is the only proof offered for the ‘ Big Bang theory ‘, and this can only be held up by an even more preposterous idea of ‘ Cosmic inflation ‘, inflating the universe from a point of singularity to fill the whole of space in a minute fraction of a billionth of a second. Kind regards, Tony Marsh.
I am very delighted seeing your presentation of experiments and those conclusion on the basis of Plank's another vision on his mathematical model of hf ,as you extended as threshold. Inverse of wavefunction collapse means generation of wavefunction below the h, a small energy wave packet. And their pile up The 2nd points that is very catchy that Bell's logic of quantum entanglement of states experimentally lose it's significance. The preloaded concepts is naturally reverse the ground state emission. In also support the tunneling pre loaded states in quantised levels. And the ratio of some quantity is the logic of your threshold theory is as good as pileup model is indeed very remarkable and matches my theoretical proves of my self developed model theory. In your quest of why factor 4 × chance instead of 1× as it is in QM .As you have also pointed self quantization of frequency is different in energy , very rightly . Let's consider Kb×T Kb = Boltzmman constant . T = Relativistic temperature = 1/(2pi×r) By definition Kb = KE /T Dirac has define h = pi/2 ( C×Mp×Rp) Get (Kb)p : where p@ proton Do same for ( Kb) Planck. The ratio = 4 I have proved same for other ratio. Congratulations I have similar understanding of fundamental of nature. In other Relativistic means I have a threshold conditions of 4 × ,also some quantization parameters.
4 is just for that one test. I see above chance up to 2000x on different ways to test.
Good lecture and materials. Thank you for sharing. Do you know if anyone has tried metamaterials for a slit and manipulating the defraction gradient? Nice to see gama results and cutoffs and such. I wonder if he would like quantum islands or degenerate matter reduced to plank. But thats a side question and not really on topic. Has anyone looked into EM guidance and lensing? Or using defraction gradients to look for clues. Rainbows and metamaterials and slits and beam splitting. Keep up the good work, and thank you for sharing.
Your channel is having problems, no views, no subscribers, no likes, no title SE, O, video in your channel, no video tag, no description, basically SE, O score is 0% out of 100% of all these problems. Because your channel has no views and no subscribers, if you do SEO, people will know about you. The people who grow their business with Google Ad, you can also grow your business from KZread and your KZread channel will also grow, thanks.
Awesome Q outlook Travis, looking forward to working with ORNL QCI on QA^HPC for our sustainable future in supercomputing 🎉
Such a great talk by Prof. N.M.Anoop Krishnan.
I love how he takes complex concepts and makes it visual. Sometimes it's difficult to feel a concept until you can see it in action.
You should do quick rehearsals with the speakers a few days prior, to decrease the substantial overhead of getting the meeting started. It's quite frustrating for the attendees. 45 minutes in and no slides are displaying yet. Rehearsals make a difference.
How could we get the slides please?
Very good intro. I managed to review a lot of basics. Thank you. I will check the book as well.
Looks like it's build on C++ or java language
Great lecture. Thank you very much!
An outstanding session. Thanks Dr Daniel; your hold on different aspects/topics of Quantum Technologies is admirable.
Hey I am really intrested in quantum computer . I am from Nepal and just completed my high school . I am planning to come usa for bachelor course . I am little confused in taking double major in physics and computer science or engineering physics.
This presentation does a great job of explaining the value of the platform.
QM classicalized in 2010: Juliana Mortenson website Forgotten Physics uncovers the ‘hidden variables’ and the bad math of Wien, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Planck, Einstein, Debroglie,Bohr etc. Galilean relative motion has the earth approaching- expanding at 16 feet per second per second constant acceleration- the released object: gravity; d=1/2at^2 part of the gravity equation. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon.
Can you share the hands-on file ?
Xanadu 1:13:32
I have participated in this activity. But I still haven't received the certificate.
hi, could you put chapters in this video on the timeline?
Hope this video by Robert Miles is useful to you kzread.info/dash/bejne/oo2M2496ZNbPfdo.html
Is there a rule on how to combine classic algorithm and quantum algorithm ? Or I am 100% flexible and can choose those I want?