Hey, you lovely lot! Remember to check out 9 Misconceptions about Evolution (and give Thomas some love!) kzread.info/dash/bejne/gXWEtbNqqtTMiZs.html

@MultiSteveB

7 жыл бұрын

Found from Holy Koolaid's channel. Subbed. :D

@KaiHenningsen

7 жыл бұрын

Sorry, was already subbed to both ...

@wmpratt2010

7 жыл бұрын

+Rationality Rules At :45 seconds, you have a drawing that is shown to be fraudulent. Might want to edit that out. 1 and 2?) Similarities do not prove relation. The problem with whales is the tail. It cannot be explained with any evidence. 3) The nerve example does not prove evolution. 4 and 5)DNA does not prove relation either. Living in the same world would require similar DNA. Evolution itself is filled with Many hell of coincidences. The perhaps millions of morphological changes that are required to go from land to sea. 6) Dogs are NOT proof of evolution rather proof of natural selection because ALL of the genetic coding for traits already existed. No new DNA is created when breeding dogs. All that happens is proteins are being turned on or off. Whats more, no matter how much dogs change, they stay dogs. 7) The moths and crickets are just natural selection, Nothing more. No new DNA was created. The Greenish Warbler birds are still birds. Your number sequence is a bit off and you never mentioned "Random genetic mutations over time is the cause of diversity". Good call sense it has no actual evidence that supports it.

@aerojovi

7 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the collaboration! I'll be subscribing as you've now worked with Alex from Cosmic Skeptic and Thomas! Clearly I should have already been subscribed here as well :)

@Jo_Kuiper

7 жыл бұрын

+Matt Farey I think, no I know the maker of this video understands this stuf a lot better than you do, and I'll do guess he did studie it, unless you. It has nothing to do "worldview", it all has to do with EVIDENCE, nothing more or less.

I always felt like half a banana. Now I know why.

@colinp2238

4 жыл бұрын

It's why some guys have bent dicks.

@thumbsup1124

3 жыл бұрын

I will tell you a story called believe in him, one day someone will ask me who do I follow and I will tell him I follow a man of great hope a man of long legacy of Truth a man who doesn't tell a lie a man who won't abandon me a man who won't forget me a man who won't abuse me but will rise me to my highest and give me guidance at my lowest a man who will protect me from all the darknesses in the world a man will forgive my sins and give me a second chance a man who shows Mercy on the wicked souls of this world and shows Justice and strength and beauty who is this man you may ask Jesus the Christ.

@FlyingSpaghettiJesus

2 жыл бұрын

@@thumbsup1124 can you demonstrate any of that dribble?

@FlyingSpaghettiJesus

2 жыл бұрын

@@thumbsup1124 _The Church is a business selling an invisible product to the gullible. Everlasting life in an invisible sky kingdom that is only available after death._ *Christianity business model* Create the problem: Original sin Create the product: salvation Create the solution: Jesus Create the advertisement: the bible Create the carrot and stick: heaven & hell Create the middleman: the corrupt clergy who command tithing, strict obedience, worship and extract emotional energy for a lifetime under guilt and fear. No need for a refund/return counter because no one will ever come back from the dead to complain that the product wasn’t delivered upon. (Adapted from John D Espinoza 2013)

@misterpx5483

4 ай бұрын

Comparable DNA is not the same as sharing DNA. They just pick and choose, thats why its 50 percent. You do not need to be a scientist to know a banana shares near zero percent with our DNA.

If woman came from ribs, why are there still ribs?

@rationalityrules

7 жыл бұрын

Haha, I see what you did there :)

@peterkiss1204

7 жыл бұрын

Weren't we formed from clay and dust? Then why are there still clay and dust? :D

@goranvuksa1220

7 жыл бұрын

They can regenerate...

@ksturmer5388

7 жыл бұрын

If Adam and Eve had three sons, how did they procreate? ;)

@ksturmer5388

7 жыл бұрын

That's what I was getting at! The more you study the book, the weirder, it get's in all reality!!

So dogs turned into dogs, moths turned into moths, crickets turn into crickets. Can you guess what the birds turned into, yep you guessed it, birds.

@dibershai6009

12 күн бұрын

This doesn't contradict evolution. It demonstrates that creatures can't evolve out of a group but only diversify within it. This is why birds for example, are still considered a type of a dinosaur even though they are very different from some extinct dinosaurs. The only difference between "microevolution" and "macroevolution" is that the latter takes millions of years.

@johnblack2573

5 күн бұрын

​@@dibershai6009 haha huh? Adapations is not evolution. "it takes millions of years" its common excuse. Bcos... It cant be proved. Like the comment says, animals stayed the same animals. Birds are not dinosaurs lol

@dibershai6009

5 күн бұрын

@@johnblack2573 It can absolutely be proven that it takes millions of years for significant changes to happen. There are proofs of evolution in many field of biology such as comparative anatomy, palaeontology, genetics. And it is known that birds are dinosaurs because the fossil record shows that dinosaurs shared many features with birds such as hollow bones, bipedalism, an avian respiratory system, and air sac system, and more. There were also many "missing links" between birds and dinosaurs and the famous Archaeopteryx is far from the only one.

@vikingskuld

2 күн бұрын

​@@dibershai6009ok first off evolution is a load of crap fake science. There is no mechanism for macro evolution. Your so called micro evolution is just adaptation nothing more. There are fish that the entire shape and bone structure can change in one generation depending on what and how it's feeding. That's not evolution it's already in the dna to do that. Common ancestry is a dream you can't prove it without dna. You can make fossils sing what ever song you want. On top of all that, you don't have millions of years in the fossil record. There have been over 250 soft tissue finds world wide now and those contain proteins like collagen and Actin. There is plenty of evidence showing how fast they break down. So the very fact we find those means all those fossils are just a few thousand years old. No more. Secular scientists are pointing out there couldnt be collagen in the fossils after 1 million years so even they know there is a problem. So there are multiple reasons why evolution is a lie can't happen and has never happened.

I was taught Evolution as fact at my Catholic School in the 1970s... what's happened to the world since then ?

@pablo9234

6 жыл бұрын

globalization leading to fear of one's culture and views disapearing, which itself lead to the reject of all the others

@richunixunix3313

5 жыл бұрын

religious fundamentalist that are attempting to take away the truth. Keep on teaching!

@paulrobinson9318

5 жыл бұрын

+@@richunixunix3313 There is NO truth at all in evolution - it cannot be tested and it cannot be observed so its NOT science - and as a philosophy it failed totally. NOT a shred of evidence to support it.

@richunixunix3313

5 жыл бұрын

@@paulrobinson9318 Paul, not sure if your just "trolling" or you really don't know?. I'm willing to listen to your supportive claims with an alternate version. But like the "Kitzmiller v. Dover School District" trial : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District were "creationism" was classified as Pseudoscience or Junk Science and holds no merit to be taught as any modern science or than supernatural fiction. I'm going to need strong a case (with evidence) in order to believe your opening statement. Now if you wish to show me evidence that has not been presented before that does not include "Special Pleading" or "Appeal to Ignorance". Then I'm willing to listen, but be forewarned EVERY crack pot Apoligest or Creationist has failed to supply any credible. testable or falsifiable evidence to support there claim. * en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis * en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution * Wiki links for ease of information. For further reading please use the over 400+ references listed at the bottom of each page to gain a better understanding of the subject. In order to present evidence, please read the following scientific requirements. A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested, in accordance with the scientific method, using a predefined protocol of observation and experiment. Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific knowledge. A scientific law is a statement based on repeated experimental observations that describes some aspect of the Universe. A hypothesis (plural hypotheses) a proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any assumption of its truth. Quote: Carl Sagan "one of the greatest commandments of science "mistrust arguments from authority" Authorities must prove their contentions like everyone else. As for me on a personal level, this is my minimum requirement for me to accept a deity: 1. A coherent definition of God 2. A set of empirically testable and falsifiable prediction based on the supposition that a God exist. Test results that match these predictions and are parsimoniously explained by God's existence than any hypothesis .

@gunsandkithes6900

5 жыл бұрын

really????

First! In all seriousness, though, I had a blast collaborating with you. I hope we can push your channel well beyond 12,000 subs with this video, and this time next year, I want to see you rocking 100,000! ;)

@rationalityrules

7 жыл бұрын

Second.

@anti-theistatheist9827

7 жыл бұрын

Holy Koolaid Thank you for telling me about this site. Subbed

@brennuvargr4638

7 жыл бұрын

Holy Koolaid Rationality Rules deserves it! One of the best channels on scepticism on KZread, in my opinion. Really digestible format, with lots of informative points and great displays of how logical fallacies are used in action by the irrational.

@ShawnNac

7 жыл бұрын

Subbed

@courierdude

7 жыл бұрын

Greetings from Canada! You guys both rock! And of course this "rock" is millions of years older than 6000 years old. lol ;)

Probably the most infuriating thing for Christians about Steve is that he challenges their believes while simultaneously impersonating Jesus.

@suneethak7436

6 жыл бұрын

Art of Wewius I laughed way too hard

@smakyakproductions4466

5 жыл бұрын

But with a bri’ish accen’.

@SpysGT

5 жыл бұрын

Watching this video is hilarious because of the far stretched facts that "support" Evolution, and bull shit that keeps coming out of his mouth

@satanno2790

5 жыл бұрын

Oh my gosh now I cannot unseen this-

@drc3po

5 жыл бұрын

@@SpysGT yep, it makes much more sense to believe in an invisible sky-man with a magic wand.

You sir, as always, have provided a well made video, easy to follow and understand. I also enjoyed Holy Koolaid's segment, as well. Keep producing excellent material, it means more than you'll ever know.

Reading these creationist comments is like watching people trying to swim up a waterfall. The levels of denial, faulty reasoning, and misinformation is positively epic.

@noplz6534

3 жыл бұрын

Ikr

@sombodysdad

3 жыл бұрын

Anyone who thinks that blind watchmaker evolution is indicative of reality is deluded.

@hammalammadingdong6244

3 жыл бұрын

@@sombodysdad thanks for proving my point.

@sombodysdad

3 жыл бұрын

@@hammalammadingdong6244 You had a point?

@percaholic6939

3 жыл бұрын

@@sombodysdad what are you even talking about

It's funny how the theory that is most controversially debated is the one that has THE MOST evidence to support it. Honestly, if we didn't experience it daily even gravity wouldn't be this evident

@wschippr1

7 жыл бұрын

Our attraction to the ground is not evidence for gravity, it is merely evidence for an attractive force. There are hundreds of attractive forces that science knows that could explain such a phenomenon, however, none are anywhere near as compelling as gravity. We actually know very little (comparatively) of how or why gravity works.

@Mariomario-gt4oy

7 жыл бұрын

Wade Schipprack we know how gravity works and that it exists. it's simple

@nikipedia2818

7 жыл бұрын

Really Mario, because the last I knew the general theory of relativity works on the basis of gravity being a consequence of space time curvature and not as a force as it acts under Newton's laws and this is why we are still having trouble fitting it in to quantum theory and can't resolve how it acts as the dominant force in the macro universe when it is so weak at a quantum level compared to the other three fundamental forces. As famous I have been able to establish, we don't appear to know what gravity 'is', we only have good descriptions of how it behaves. If it's simple though, maybe you could explain?

@wmpratt2010

7 жыл бұрын

+epicdman813 He didn't provide evidence, he provided "proofs" He's attempting to argue it as a legal case, not a scientific case. If you scrutinized what was presented, theres not much there.

@5foldunderstanding547

7 жыл бұрын

epicdman813 The building blocks of Science are based on observation- *YET Like A Solid Transitional Fossil, EVILOUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED!*

"But evolution doesn't explain how life began, therefore its false!" -Seemingly most apologists

@Ottawa411

4 жыл бұрын

@AllSeeingEye ofGod Your problem is that you have decided what the answer is and set out to pick fragments you think back up this view. Science looks at the world and tries to find out what they are observing and how to make sense of it. Like, if god was with Adam and Eve from the beginning, why was it that only the Twelve Tribes of Israel had knowledge of it? How would it make sense that, until about 2,000 years ago, nobody outside Israel knew of Christianity? Why are there no traces of it prior to about 1200 BCE anywhere? Speaking humans were around for about 50,000 years before any of them found your god. The Jews weren't Egyptian slaves, the Exodus didn't occur, no Exodus = no Moses, there was no global flood, the bible copied many stories that predated the Jews, nobody knows who wrote most of the bible. Nobody seemed to be aware that Jesus existed for decades after his death. Why would any rational person believe this?

@js83kaxhf

4 жыл бұрын

Show one observable example of change of species. There should be millions for each species. Just need one

@outdoorsmenadventure8391

4 жыл бұрын

@AllSeeingEye ofGod evolution is real and does happen through mutations all the evidence proves that evolution is real

@goldbyrd3667

4 жыл бұрын

@Steve All of what? The universe? That's a field of study separate from evolution. Even the scientists in the field you may be referring to only have faceted knowledge and don't have a concrete explanation of the origin of the universe Or you might be being sarcastic in that case just ignore me

@butterskywalker8785

3 жыл бұрын

@AllSeeingEye ofGod how DO you possible believe that the universe came from nothing then that nothing became an intelligent being.

This blows my mind. I had this OMG moment where I realized how hard it is to understand evolution, and therefore I understand why people would rather be told they have purpose in life.

@jamesscott3234

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah.... that's the BIG scary thing for a lot of humans. Somehow the existence of a 'natural' social contract with your fellow humans, isn't enough. Much more 'pleasant' then, having to be 'told' what your supposed to do! (sarcasm off)

@sombodysdad

3 жыл бұрын

Evolution isn't hard to understand. Mutations happen. But DNA is not destiny. It does not determine biological form. It just holds the code for RNA sequences. So evolution happens but universal common descent doesn't have a mechanism capable of doing the job.

@sombodysdad

3 жыл бұрын

@@jamesscott3234 It's scary that people actually believe that nature can produce coded information processing systems like the genetic code.

@sombodysdad

3 жыл бұрын

@Ethan Wilde Go hump your strawman.

@sombodysdad

3 жыл бұрын

@Ethan Wilde Morons mock what they cannot understand.

So, in other words, no matter what I eat, under a specific light I'm a cannibal?

@alexolas1246

6 жыл бұрын

"under a specific light"

@dp-zn8bd

6 жыл бұрын

la .alEksolas. If that specific light is false

@grantlauzon5237

5 жыл бұрын

Unless you’re eating an alien then (in a specific light while squinting and shaking your head) yes. But bananas are very different and most life needs death of others to survive. Circle of life and what not.

@miklo6907

5 жыл бұрын

Yes because our common ancestor is God

@halogen5580

5 жыл бұрын

its only canniblism if you eat your own species its not canniblism if you eat other species

I did find Holy Koolaid a while ago and love his content but then I found your channel RR and you became my first creator of content that I supported. both of you are good and I use both channels in explaining things to my daughter.

@rationalityrules

7 жыл бұрын

Glad we can help : ) Cheers Ben!

Have you ever seen the domesticated Russian fox experiment? The most interesting to me is how when selecting for tameness they got some other traits that were not selected for like drooping ears, change in coat colors and curled tails. I think it demonstrates well that when one thing changes in an animal can have some interesting side effects

"Gods are fragile things, they may be killed by a whiff of science or a dose of common sense." ~ Chapman Cohen

@lukejones5272

23 күн бұрын

Funny thing about "science," it [they / atheist scientists] has been forced to recall falsehoods far more often than theologians. Evolution is on revision 4, and the Big Bang is on Revision 5. Big universities are starting to take *abiogenesis* out of their text books as a debunked idea. Bible is on Rev-. And the better data in recent decades has not only debunked previous evolutionary "proofs" but also shown remarkable consistency with recent global flood and non-descendant speciation.

Am I the only one who has noticed that only creationists use the words "Macroevolution" and "Microevolution"?

@locutusdborg126

7 жыл бұрын

And they use the word Kind instead of species or genus. It is a Christian word for the "kinds" of creatures their god created. All fictional, of course.

@purugigi

7 жыл бұрын

NevilleRhysBarnes I stand corrected! I may hear the terms later in my degree. (It's my first year)

@m33p0

7 жыл бұрын

they also like to use historical science and observational science.

@wmpratt2010

7 жыл бұрын

Its an important distinction between micro and macro. Its a lesson in circular definitions. Micro-evolution is used to prove Macro-evolution because there's not much evidence for it. Then they say Micro is true because Macro is true.

@PedroCouto1982

7 жыл бұрын

They were used by biologists with different meanings before creationists started using them.

"Were you there?!!!!" ~Ken Ham. You should do a video debunking Ham's argument :p

@rationalityrules

7 жыл бұрын

Great suggestion : ) Here's me taking on that claim kzread.info/dash/bejne/qq17t7RvndbTk6w.html

@braedynverigin4837

7 жыл бұрын

Ken wasn’t there when the bible was written, therefore ken can’t prove the bible was written

@ciarfah

7 жыл бұрын

braedyn verigin Bu-but it's God's word I dun need to be there

@infinitetundra

7 жыл бұрын

But you were there Silver Surfer.

@stylis666

7 жыл бұрын

I was there when Jesus skipped an amputee to heal a 'cripple' and a 'blind' man. David Blain would have healed the amputee while being blindfolded, in a straitjacket, riding a unicycle backwards on liquid water. Ez pz.

The fact that animals have similarities does not imply that they came from a common ancestor. It fits into the idea of evolution but that’s all.

@Zanta100

2 жыл бұрын

yes it does it is the most loical explanation

@arczisdonald

2 жыл бұрын

@@Zanta100 it’s not logical at all to assume they have a common ancestor based off of similarities. There are other explanations and saying your explanation is the most logical doesn’t prove that it the correct one.

@Zanta100

2 жыл бұрын

@@arczisdonald true it alone doesnt prove anything the rest of the massive mounbtain of evidence for it together with this does

@arczisdonald

2 жыл бұрын

@@Zanta100 that doesn’t even count as evidence. There are too many possible explanations and you haven’t provided proof that yours is best. It doesnt matter how many other pieces of “evidence” you have. My point still stands.

Love how there was no intro, you just jumped right into the video

Great content. Long time viewer of Holy Koolaid. I will be watching more of your videos.

I've been watching Thomas for some time now. I'm glad to see the two of collaborating.

@KARAIsaku

2 жыл бұрын

He calls Thomas a "remarkably talented CREATOR".

Always love finding channels like yours sir. Cheers!

First off' I wanted to let you know that Thomas sent me. Second' I loved your video and look forward to more. Also Darwin's finches and ferns are a great example of evolution that is so fast you can witness the oscillation over a very few generations and is where he discovered the truth of evolution! Keep up the good work!

“DNA is the greatest troll in history.” This is the quote I will remember you for

@theMkawi

3 жыл бұрын

hhhhhhh. the whole video debunked by three statements: first: similarities don't means evolution. I can iphone-5 is not evolution of iphone-4. both made separately. second: from the beginning of evolution theory, they every time claim the designer isn't intelligent because they don't know the purpose of something inside a creation but after some years, scientists discover the purpose but these evolutionary claim new things because they don't know. if someone goes back and look at what they had said without purpose, he will laugh because discoveries show they are so important. Third: we don't have a problem in natural selection and mutations. However, if a manufacturer makes two types of iphone, then we keep destroying one type. this isn't evolution. Evolution means we will a get a Samsung from these iphones.

@FakingANerve

2 жыл бұрын

@@theMkawi Evolution is bunk because of... iPhones? Incredible. Get that shit peer-reviewed, my friend!

@johnkoay8097

4 ай бұрын

@@theMkawi I agree with you on the iPhone thingy. It's also similar to Bill Gates various versions of windows. It looks like Darwinian evolution. It looks like there is design in it. And the reality is that there is design in it, but it is not as sophisticated as the design in the living things we see. The fact is they didn't come about by themselves.

@johnkoay8097

4 ай бұрын

@@FakingANerve The bible said this thousands of years ago. In trying to be smart, they become fools. That is that evolutionists has become.

@cliftongaither6642

Ай бұрын

​@@johnkoay8097where does the bible say this?

Holy Kool-Aid sent me!! i look forward to binging on your videos!! (ps, love your accent!)

This video has been around years and I've only just found it. Glad I did. Straight into my favourites.

Nearly fell out of my chair at "If [they] didn't evolve ... DNA is the greatest troll in history"

it's funny how fundamentalists and literalists say that evolution is false, but believe that the serpent in the garden of eden (genesis) evolved into a seven-headed dragon (book of revelation) because it is written in their scriptures.

@RC_1930

3 жыл бұрын

What you mean ?

@radioactive4242

Ай бұрын

They actually beileve that the talking snake became an invisble demon called satan that tells you to do bad stuff. But its funny bc the bible never say anything about that. Proof that beilevers just make stuff up hence their name.

You are a smart guy (I'm a fan and subscriber), so don't be sloppy in your language by using the word "proofs". Evolution is a scientific fact and the theory of evolution is the best explanation of that fact. It is supported by an "overwhelming preponderance of evidence" and is accepted by the vast majority of experts but it has never been "proved" and never will be.

@rationalityrules

7 жыл бұрын

There are two languages. One of science, and one of the colloquial. If I'm trying to communicate with the people, I'll respectfully speak their language :)

@okfanriffic3632

7 жыл бұрын

Love you, but why invite the obvious comments from creationists? If I can see it (I spend too much time reading their shite) then so can they. Strictly speaking they are correct and when they win one point it makes further points easier to win. Imagine this conversation. " those evolutionists are so arrogant they deny scientific rigour and say they can "prove" evolution. Look here's a popular "scientific atheist" who gives proofs for a scientific theory. Conclusion, evolution is not a science it is a religion/dogma/ideology. Oh Fuck I can already see my comment (out of context of course) in a creationist blog (did I mention You are great and don't stop what you're doing!)

@okfanriffic3632

7 жыл бұрын

OK. BUT! imagine this conversation (and your part in it). Evolution isn't science. Science is the pursuit of knowledge and the knowledge is provisional and based on current evidence and understanding. So science can never be proved only disproved. Yet here we have popular youtube atheist "rationality rules" claiming "proofs" for a scientific theory. This "proves" (sic) that evolution is dogma/ideology/religion/ non science/whatever. Don't give them fodder for their nonsense but also don't take it personally, I love your work and style and it is a small (hopefully constructive) criticism..

@kcwidman

7 жыл бұрын

ok fanriffic unless we document our world for the next 100,000 years.

@stylis666

7 жыл бұрын

ok fanriffic It's gonna be just fine. Just tell them you're in the Cult of Dusty. Doesn't matter if you like his videos or not, just say it, to fuck with them :p Just imagine their shock if you tell them that he's our leader and they go over and watch a few videos of his :p

Rationality Rules, thank you for this video. I just heard of you through holy koolaid. This video is not just educational but it was entertaining as well.

As a subscriber to Holy Koolaid, I watched the first half of this video first and followed the link to this video. I liked it so much I am now a subscriber here as well. Brilliant. As always, be rational and don't drink the Koolaid.

You and Holy Koolaid--what a team!

Well thank you man! I am a Christian and I was always a bit affraid to watch video's like yours because they may shake my faith. Only to find that you present the same classical examples and arguments that have been publicly destroyed by mostly Kent Hovind. Mind you, in public debates with professors who presented their best 'proofs' for calling evolution a fact. What I saw mostly was artistic illustrations, and you do the same. Simply because you don't have much else. So thanks man!! I will check out the videos this Holy Koolaid person too.

@pikador0078

Жыл бұрын

Very well said :)

@hurrikanehavok7313

6 ай бұрын

Totally agree. This was subpar at very best. Woodfurd isnt going to debate anyone on this topic anytime soon. They were the same lame tired old arguments that have been smacked down a hundred times

@pattyfasbender2600

2 ай бұрын

Similar characteristics/features of creatures show a engineer with a great base model and building variation into His creation - Where does the additional information come from through evolution? It can't, because you can't increase information (Laws of Thermodynamics) Peppered Moths demonstrate dominant/recessive genes in a micro-evolution environment just as the video itself said and the Green Warbler is a loss of information. Thanks again long haired dude for reinforcing my confirmation that you all really don't have any valid ammunition against Creation.

@APsGTG

10 күн бұрын

Facts lol. To claim evolution as fact then to turn around and call creationists crazy is one of the greatest pieces of hypocrisy in the modern era.

A fine and informative collaboration, thank you gentlemen.

As George Carlin once said: "Earth can fix itself." That thing about the moth reminded me of this: kzread.info/dash/bejne/aYtnlaqLk5SnZsY.html

[places stupid bible verse without watching the video] assuming this is most of the apologists comments

If I were a designer of nerves serving the heart and voice box, I would want to reduce the tension load on the nerve. I would give the nerves strength by having both nerves attached together. In order to keep the voice box nerve from being pulled off the voice box, I would stabilize it by having it attached to the vagus nerve and coming from below. I would put a little message in the design that says "Out of the abundance of the Heart the mouth speaks".

@appleseedgames6934

3 жыл бұрын

Thats your weak explanation for it? You still didn't even address the fact that its a trait derived from our ancient fish ancestors. Why doesn't your God just tell you why he made such an extremely rubbish designed body? Oh wait, he can't

6:42 I love this stock photo, I see it all the time. That beagle is my spirit animal.

You are a great presenter. Your meaning is clear. Your accent is pleasing. You pronounce your words clearly. You project intelligence.

In addition, I would point out that Hippos (like whales/dolphins etc) have internal testicles unlike most land mammals.

@ew5781

3 жыл бұрын

Sounds like intelligent Design

@crazyviking24

3 жыл бұрын

@@ew5781 Sounds far more like natural selection.

@lepep6737

3 жыл бұрын

@@crazyviking24 cuz them predytors won't bite them there

1:42 I wanted to look more into it, but I can't see to find the links.

The most pressing issue against evolution is never addressed, that is how does new information arise in organisms to produce more complex organisms

I was already subbed to both of you. Well done with these videos. I really enjoyed watching them.

@azuregriffin1116

6 жыл бұрын

Godless Cranium hey! Godless Cranium. I'm late lol.

@stephenyin6711

6 жыл бұрын

Hey it's GC

@trentrubenacker9718

6 жыл бұрын

Holy shit. GC. This is like meeting a celebrity.

@AnthonyMLT

5 жыл бұрын

@godless cranium I win I am subbed to all 3 of you lol.

6:05 Being encased in dense fat isn't that rare. I see mammals with that trait every day. :D

@hmmm4989

3 жыл бұрын

Wait-

Rationality Rules Great video! What other sources would you recommend for people who would like to learn more about Evolution?

Hey RR :) I've been going into biology and evolution theory quite intensively for the last couple of weeks and wondered whether you are a darwinist/new synthesist or "McClintockist". Greetings from Switzerland.

It amazes me, that we now live in a day and age that Evolution needs to be proven, rather than just the accepted facts of the world.

@generalleigh7387

6 жыл бұрын

blue main I'll bet that you are not able to systematically lay on the table how life began and arrived to where we are today. Your very first dilemma is to find a way to override the first law of thermodynamics.

@generalleigh7387

6 жыл бұрын

Evolutionists have to make a leap of faith to go from nothing......to an existent universe. By the way, the word universe is a very interesting study. Herminudics break it down to "a single spoken verse." Bible says that God spoke the universe into existence. If God is God, He has the authority to override the first law of thermodynamics. If not, then He is BOUND to creation and does not deserve to be worshiped.

@32drunkmonk

6 жыл бұрын

Your right I could not, I'm no scientist. but I think you are making assumptions. first, universe comes from the latin universum meaning all together or turned into one. second nothing to something. I don't think that's the case, there was something I'm sure, non living matter to living matter is no stretch. third yes energy cannot be created nor destroyed but it can change. light to heat to kinetic to any other form of energy. it does not have to be overridden. and lastly, evolution is not abiogenesis.

@j0hncon5tantine

6 жыл бұрын

@blue main It is not a fact and is not true, biological evolution is a loaded word with partial truths but darwins evolution of all living organisms on Earth having a common ancestor is false! *** GOD IS REAL AND CAN BE PROVEN IN A COURT OF LAW!!! The biologically immortal organisms that lack senescence are already extremely great proof for God and his design but if you want more..... The 3 main forms of evidence that would be acceptable and legitimate in a court of law for the existence of God would be..... "Life after Death experience studies where people witness a creator God- " iands.org/resources/education/recommended-reading.html " " time.com/68381/life-beyond-death-the-science-of-the-afterlife-2/ ", .......... Multiple Studies on the effectiveness of prayer from multiple religions involving a creator God like in the book "The Divine Matrix by Gregg Braden" " www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_i_2_13?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=divine +matrix+gregg+braden&sprefix=divine+matrix%2Cstripbooks%2C195&crid=3BXKVNJABO9OK " along with other such studies proving a positive co-relation, ...... Positive co-relation to prayer in a peer reviewed study.......... jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/485161 ............ and scientific facts mentioned in the Bible before their human discovery by a divine influence, www.eternal-productions.org/101science.html ....... For example….. 1. The singing stars. Job 38:7 declares the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy. It sounds like a bit of Bible poetry but not much more. After all, stars shine, not sing, right? Well, it turns out scientists have been able to convert patterns from start light into audio wavelengths, according to Discovery News. The “amount of hiss” in the audio reportedly allows scientists to measure the surface gravity on a star and gauge where it is in its stellar evolution. 2. Weight of the winds. In Job 28:25, we are told that God weighed out the wind. This one may be no more self-evident to us than it was to an ancient Israelite reader of this text. But, we know from modern science that air, since it does have mass, weighs something. You might be surprised to know how much though: an estimated one ton of air is weighing down on shoulders, according to this science site (which explains that we don’t feel it because the air is exerting its force in all directions). This is pretty basic stuff for modern scientists, but it’s quite a credit to the inerrancy of Scripture that the author of Job got it right so long ago (approximately in the second millennium BC). 3. A massive fountain of water deep beneath the Earth!!! Genesis 7:11 "In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened." www.thesun.co.uk/news/2242110/scientists-discovered-water-from-biblical-great-flood-in- worlds-deepest-hole/ www.express.co.uk/news/weird/733026/Russia-science-Kola-borehole-Noah-floodwater-Bible- Genesis-theory-of-12 creation.com/oceans-of-water-deep-inside-the-earth "Scientists dig the world’s deepest hole - and find ‘water from NOAH’S FLOOD’ at the bottom The revelation also reportedly "disproves the myth" that the earth is made up of dry rocky layers" All these would stand the scrutiny of a judge and jury for the case of a creator Gods existence and the legitimacy of the Christian Faith!!! But I am feeling generous so I will give you two more great forms of evidence, how about this book where a forensic officer who is atheist studies and researches the Bible to see if it proves a historical Jesus and if he was murdered wrongfully? Cold-Case Christianity: A Homicide Detective Investigates the Claims of the Gospels www.amazon.com/Cold-Case-Christianity-Homicide-Detective-Investigates/dp/1434704696, afterward he became Christian!!! Also, why don't you just pray to God yourself and ask him if he is real? What more can I say??? Then you would have personal evidence and proof of Gods interaction yourself..... I mean, there is actually way way way more evidence for God than this but it either would go over your head or you would not understand it properly and you would question it, but this is really solid evidence and proof I have given you up above that would hold up in a court of law........... if you decide to RUN from it, at least admit to yourself that is what you are doing........ Do you believe your life, body, family and the ground you walk on are all a gift or something else? If you believe they are all something else then what do you think they all are then?***

@arnouth5260

5 жыл бұрын

bazil bourgeois noah’s flood is known not to have occurred

as i far as i read charles darwin never said that we came from apes, but he said we have the bit same dna with apes family

@Ottawa411

4 жыл бұрын

Darwin predates our knowledge of DNA. He was unaware of it's existence.

Drug resistant bacteria might be a good line of argument. The harvard experiment with varying concentrations of antibiotic is a nice demonstration.

Thanks for the video. Summed up so nicely

4:27 *What did you just say?!* NOW THAT'S JUST BEING RUDE!

@xvampirex11

3 жыл бұрын

how is it rude if it isnt real in the first place, you just believe it exists

But, but, but, SHOW ME A CHAND OF KINDS! Not a change in species, a change of kinds. Those are still birds! Checkmate atheists! **sarcasm alert**

@ksturmer5388

7 жыл бұрын

You believe in Unicorns and talking donkeys and behemoths! Check mate, bible bashers! PS. Best wishes...fellow human. ;)

@kcwidman

6 жыл бұрын

I have watched about 10 of them. :)

@generalleigh7387

6 жыл бұрын

Atheism exists to ignore the rationality of morality- if there is no God, there is no morality. Then empty all of the prisons in the world and stop dictating to anyone ever regarding right and wrong. If there is no standard for truth then set those poor rapists, murderers and child molesters free.

@ShawnNac

6 жыл бұрын

Austin Waters if you open the prison you would be releasing all the religious. Very few Atheist's are imprisoned.

@theextraterrestrialsscienc7122

6 жыл бұрын

Lynn Troller "if there is no God, there is no morality." No!!! Every rational person knows that morality is independent from God, except you incredibly indoctrinated ones.

The best evoloution is from Charmander to Charmeleon!

Legendary collaboration.

It's astonishing that this explanation is even necessary these days!

Nothing is more eye opening than this type of information and evidence regarding related biological evolution we share with other species and well presented.

@antoniobrown6210

3 ай бұрын

You do realize there are so many problems with this argument right? one of them being similarities in no way are prove of ancestry, how do you know an intelligent designer didn't use the same blueprint RIDICLOUS

how can i make subtitles for this?

the other day i had an argument vs someone who studied biochem. this student of biochem is skeptical about evolution. my brain almost broke in half when i found out. in case you are not aware, in biochemistry, we study a lot of genomics/proteomics. there is no other more convincing line of evidence for evolution than genomics and proteomics.

Christians: *"ThAt IsNt EvIdEnCe"*

@GabrielV65

2 жыл бұрын

Christian here, evolution is true

0:45 Why? Why in the world would you use (a modified version) of Haeckel's images of embryos, which are known to be inaccurate? You bent over backwards to give Creationists an easy target.

@jonasg.bisgaard1086

7 ай бұрын

What do you mean by “inaccurate” implying evolution is false? If that’s the case I really want to see your source of that.

@TonyTigerTonyTiger

7 ай бұрын

@@jonasg.bisgaard1086 " implying evolution is false?" I didn't imply evolution is false. Using Haeckel's images of embryos - which are known to be inaccurate - gives Creationists an easy target. There are actual photos of actual embryos that make the point much better.

1:41 I don't see any such link(s) in the description

Nailed it! Again, short and succinct :)

Why am i watching this? I've already studied biology and evolution... This is boring to me for the most part. Gotta keep my anti creationists arguments sharp.

@phillipharrington9201

5 жыл бұрын

Skinnymarks, if you want to keep your arguments sharp then tell me how the universe came about naturally. Tell me how life first came about, if you can’t, why should I believe in materialism?

@phillipharrington9201

5 жыл бұрын

John Daedalus, there are a few theories out there with some potential but the problem is we are teaching these theories as facts when they have come nowhere near proving naturalism correct. There is simply too much extrapolation and theorizing being taught as facts when they simply aren’t yet. People are also taught that supernaturalism is simply stupid and wrong even though naturalists have come nowhere close to proving they are correct. This is what troubles me about the whole natural/supernatural debate. This is why I asked the questions I did. Naturalists often laugh at the straight forward answers given by religion and philosophy but always fail to give the same straight forward answers while insisting the other two studies are wrong.

@superduperfreakyDj

5 жыл бұрын

@@phillipharrington9201 Philosophy is not 'spiritual' or 'supernatural'. Naturalism is a form of philosophy in itself

@superduperfreakyDj

5 жыл бұрын

@@phillipharrington9201 And the reason why people think supernaturalism is stupid is because the supernatural has never done anything tangible or obervable to make us believe it is real

@phillipharrington9201

5 жыл бұрын

Ducky McDuckface, naturalism has never come through on any of its claims about the origin of life or the universe. The Bible, in particular, serves as historical records and eyewitness accounts to supernatural events. Darwinism and naturalism have nether of these things going for them. Unless you have disproven every last account of supernatural activity ever reported then you cannot say it has not happened. I agree that the supernatural is more irregular than natural processes but that does not mean it has not happened. There is plenty of archeology to support Biblical claims about the past but unless you have disproven all of them you can’t say it never occurred. Just because you have not witnessed the supernatural doesn’t mean someone else has not.

Cue lots of angry Christians, below. They furiously demand that this is inadequate evidence, and yet cannot present anything even close to being this compelling for the bumbling sky wizard.

@sombodysdad

3 жыл бұрын

THere wasn't anything in the video that relates to blind and mindless processes.

@sombodysdad

3 жыл бұрын

@@plantae420 No one us debating mere evolution.

@plantae420

3 жыл бұрын

@@sombodysdad Sorry I forgot that I had written to you before. I am bad in remembering names.

@sombodysdad

3 жыл бұрын

@L Ron Cupboard or what? You gonna cry to your mommy you ignorant coward

@larjkok1184

3 жыл бұрын

@@sombodysdad We’ll leave the mindless processes to you.

6:18 also both wales and hippos have internal testicles. In fact, as far as i remember they are only 2 group of mammals have this treat.

1:52 to skip the preamble.

If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck then it's probably a duck who evolved over millions of years

@Will-wi7hv

7 жыл бұрын

MosesBad lol😂

Holy Koolaid sent me! Looking forward to more content like this.

4:20 This point is so great

@late8641

4 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/lYNlw5N-m5CudJM.html Have you seen this video? I think showing this to a creationist should do it if they actually were intellectually honest.

If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find no such case.

When I was growing up, all of this was called: "Adaptation" and/or "micro-evolution."

@mcarrowtime7095

3 жыл бұрын

That’s because you didn’t pay enough attention to the Video, boomer

@alwaysovercomingbear4809

3 жыл бұрын

@@mcarrowtime7095 Maybe instead of name calling, you could explain it to me. I am simply after the truth!

@mcarrowtime7095

3 жыл бұрын

@@alwaysovercomingbear4809 well, I don’t know when you were in school, but now they teach the difference between adaptation (microevolution) and speciation (macroevolution)

@alwaysovercomingbear4809

3 жыл бұрын

@@mcarrowtime7095 And do they claim micro evolution as proof that we all started as slime, by accident?

@mcarrowtime7095

3 жыл бұрын

@@alwaysovercomingbear4809 that’s abiogenesis, a completely different field of study. And as far as I know, it’s not a required course. I know it’s optional to learn about the people who created amino acids (the building blocks of life) in a situation similar to that of primordial earth, proving it possible.

A cell is so intricate you will see a house construct itself out of the forest before you will see a cell naturally made, just think a single cell organism is more sophisticated than building a house

@PhilipK-xk4by

12 сағат бұрын

And yet, forests are absolutely teeming with cells and totally lacking in self-constructed houses.

It is great to see a new generation of rational people armed with facts, technology, enthusiasm and integrity.

much thanks to my catholic high school for linking me this video for my BIO30 class

Is the 50% that we have in common with bananas specifically active genes or the entire gene sequence? I heard that ferns have a lot of DNA so I was wondering if an animal had twice as much DNA would that be where the 50% came from or are they only counting active genes?

I was interested in your channel because of Cosmic Skeptic and Holy Coolaid. Hitting that subscribe button.

I just found this channel and I’m already in love with it. ❤️

@gallo916

4 жыл бұрын

Katlyn Dehart - evolution is based on fAith . Please listen to a real scientist. kzread.info/dash/bejne/pGinspN-Ya3Kj7w.html

@retrospective9386

3 жыл бұрын

@@gallo916 bruh evolution does not explain how life originates that's abiogenesis evolution explaisn how we got to this point

@gallo916

3 жыл бұрын

@@retrospective9386 macro evolution does not exist it’s a fairytale .. we only see adaptation of the same species changing depending on the environment .

@barkankirecci6939

11 ай бұрын

@@gallo916 mutacions exist right? some people have different problems in their boddy. some pople borning whit different hands or whitout hand. if they were managed to expand this DNA to other people. that would be evolution. that's FUCKİNG SİMPLE

Evidence for evolution comes from various fields of biology and geology, providing a comprehensive and well-supported understanding of how species change over time. Here are some key pieces of evidence: 1. Fossil Record Transitional Fossils: Fossils that show intermediate states between an ancestral form and that of its descendants. Examples include the transition from fish to amphibians (Tiktaalik), reptiles to birds (Archaeopteryx), and land mammals to whales (Ambulocetus). Stratigraphy: Fossils found in different geological layers demonstrate a timeline of gradual change, with simpler organisms found in older layers and more complex ones in newer layers. 2. Comparative Anatomy Homologous Structures: Body parts that are similar in structure but may serve different functions in different species, indicating a common ancestor. For example, the forelimbs of humans, cats, whales, and bats. Vestigial Structures: Body parts that have lost their original function through evolution. Examples include the human appendix, the pelvis in whales, and the wings of flightless birds like ostriches. 3. Comparative Embryology Embryonic Development: Similarities in the early stages of development in different species suggest a common ancestry. For instance, vertebrate embryos exhibit pharyngeal pouches (which develop into gills in fish and parts of the ear and throat in mammals). 4. Molecular Biology DNA and Protein Similarities: The genetic code is universal among all living organisms, and closely related species have more similar DNA sequences. Comparisons of specific genes (like the cytochrome c gene) and proteins (like hemoglobin) show degrees of relatedness. Endogenous Retroviruses (ERVs): These are viral sequences that have become part of the genome. Shared ERVs in the same genomic locations among different species indicate common ancestry. 5. Biogeography Geographic Distribution: The distribution of species around the world reflects their evolutionary history. For example, the unique species found on islands (like the finches of the Galápagos Islands) demonstrate adaptive radiation from a common ancestor. Plate Tectonics: The movement of continents explains the historical distribution of species. Fossils of the same species found on different continents support the idea that these continents were once connected. 6. Direct Observation Microevolution: Changes within a species can be directly observed. Examples include the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria, pesticide resistance in insects, and changes in the beak sizes of finches documented by Peter and Rosemary Grant in the Galápagos Islands. Speciation Events: New species have been observed forming in real-time, such as the apple maggot fly, which shifted from hawthorn trees to apple trees, leading to reproductive isolation and the beginnings of speciation. 7. Experimental Evidence Artificial Selection: Selective breeding in plants and animals demonstrates how selection can lead to significant changes over relatively short periods. Dogs, for example, have been bred for various traits resulting in a wide variety of breeds from a common ancestor. These lines of evidence collectively support the theory of evolution, demonstrating how species have adapted and changed over time through natural processes. References: Fossil Record Transitional Fossils: Daeschler, E. B., Shubin, N. H., & Jenkins, F. A. (2006). A Devonian tetrapod-like fish and the evolution of the tetrapod body plan. Nature, 440(7085), 757-763. Chiappe, L. M., & Dyke, G. J. (2002). The early evolutionary history of birds. Journal of the Paleontological Society of Korea, 18(1), 133-160. Stratigraphy: Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Schmitz, M., & Ogg, G. (Eds.). (2012). The Geologic Time Scale 2012. Elsevier. Comparative Anatomy Homologous Structures: Shubin, N. (2008). Your Inner Fish: A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body. Pantheon Books. Vestigial Structures: Laubichler, M. D., & Maienschein, J. (Eds.). (2007). From Embryology to Evo-Devo: A History of Developmental Evolution. MIT Press. Comparative Embryology Embryonic Development: Gilbert, S. F. (2010). Developmental Biology (9th ed.). Sinauer Associates. Molecular Biology DNA and Protein Similarities: Brown, T. A. (2002). Genomes (2nd ed.). Wiley-Liss. Li, W.-H. (1997). Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates. Endogenous Retroviruses (ERVs): Belshaw, R., Pereira, V., Katzourakis, A., Talbot, G., Paces, J., Burt, A., & Tristem, M. (2004). Long-term reinfection of the human genome by endogenous retroviruses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(14), 4894-4899. Biogeography Geographic Distribution: Lomolino, M. V., Riddle, B. R., & Whittaker, R. J. (2016). Biogeography (5th ed.). Sinauer Associates. Plate Tectonics: Hallam, A. (1994). An Outline of Phanerozoic Biogeography. Oxford University Press. Direct Observation Microevolution: Grant, P. R., & Grant, B. R. (2002). Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science, 296(5568), 707-711. Levy, S. B., & Marshall, B. (2004). Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responses. Nature Medicine, 10, S122-S129. Speciation Events: Bush, G. L. (1994). Sympatric speciation in animals: new wine in old bottles. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9(8), 285-288. Experimental Evidence Artificial Selection: Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species. John Murray. Trut, L. N. (1999). Early canid domestication: The farm-fox experiment. American Scientist, 87(2), 160-169.

I miss this era of Steve's work!!! So good!

I've read so much evolution that the arguments presented are nothing new to me, however, the presentation is what sells it. I do indeed plan on making a video about vestiges, which could be, if you and I are still going to collaborate, the topic of choice.

@duke-swtmate4154

5 жыл бұрын

6:32 He claims that the similarities between certain animals point to a common ancestor. Has he never thought about that statement? I see these similarities for a proof of an intelligent designer!

The word 'proof' should never be used outside the world of mathematics

@HolyKoolaid

7 жыл бұрын

And the world of SEO. lol

@rationalityrules

7 жыл бұрын

What Holy Koolaid said, lol

@wschippr1

7 жыл бұрын

Search Engine Opitmization?

@wmpratt2010

7 жыл бұрын

I agree but Rationality rules was making a legal case not a scientific one.

@TonyTigerTonyTiger

7 жыл бұрын

"Proof is only for mathematics ... and alcohol."

I have a question! Do you believe in statistical theory? Is so, which branch?

The aztecs and many other south american civilizations have stories of te-chichi, the Chihuaua. These stories, and the chihuahua, predate the breeding practices you described by several thousand years. However, the FACT that you can breed dogs intentionally is obviously true, and your point in using that example was still rock solid! Just filling in some factual holes. Also, the silver fox experiment clearly demonstrates api-genetically that dogs differentiation from wolves had little to do with wolf breeding. Keep up the good... GREAT work!

Someone send this video to Tucker Carlson

To the 279 that disliked this video; Go back to school.

@hichemept8027

4 жыл бұрын

@Gabe Norman she is ignorant

@Ottawa411

4 жыл бұрын

@Gabe Norman As opposed to believing something that was written down anonymously 2,000 years ago?

@gallo916

4 жыл бұрын

M Rona . Your pretty but smart as a rock lol,Listen to a real scientist ,not a hippie . kzread.info/dash/bejne/pGinspN-Ya3Kj7w.html

I just came from the other video and I've subscribed to you

@nym1001

5 жыл бұрын

stated clearly is a channel I'd recommend.

What DID you study?! Such general scientific knowledge!

Thank you so much. I had a weird christian dream and was a little psyched out. Then I went down the rabbit hole of christian videos and ended up on one "disproving" evolution. Well, this ten minute video has been enough to ground me again. Amazing facts too!

@user-md2fm7ik2z

3 жыл бұрын

What happened in your dream ?

@ryanscaggs1674

2 жыл бұрын

Why would turn away from the Holy Spirit, this dude proved speciation. Give one piece of evidence for kinds evolving into new kinds, there's no observable evidence of a family/genus evolving into a new family/genus only speciation which is just natural selection

@felixthecatofficial6793

Жыл бұрын

Maybe you should listen to your dream and not these so called "facts."

@rickys.6498

Жыл бұрын

Seriously? You almost become religious again because of a stupid dream? It's ridiculous man. Dreams are nothing but your thoughts, your brain activity while you sleep, nothing more. Be more rational in your life dude.

@rickys.6498

Жыл бұрын

@@felixthecatofficial6793 Your sentence is one of the worst advice i read in my life. You advise this guy to believe in dreams that are imaginary and unreal rather than believing in reality? This is so stupid lmao. Dreams are just dreams, they are not real, they have no values. These are just your thoughts imagined by your brain while you sleep. The real and natural facts on other hand are very real, they are not dreams, the observable reality is not a dream. And evolution is not a "so-called facts" evolution is a fact. Delete the "so-called" before the word facts because there is absolutely nothing "so-called" in evolution. Evolution is a proven and indisputable fact whether you like it or not. Evolution is reality, if you hate evolution it means you hate reality. And if you hate reality it's your problem dude not mine, good luck.

You deserve more subscribers

@HolyKoolaid

7 жыл бұрын

NOT So Average Joe Share his videos around. It helps more people find his content, and the more it's shared outside KZread, the more likely KZread is to start recommending it to more ppl.

@megamind6000

5 жыл бұрын

Yes he do.

I am sure you've been told this.a million times but you're absolutely amazing. 👍👍👍👍👍👍

Holy Koolaid sent me, and he was right. Awesome channel, man!

My love of biology, evolution and genetics pushed me to becoming an atheist :)

@thesceptic7968

7 жыл бұрын

I was just another East End boy from London who was suspicious of religion. The evidence that made me an atheist way back in the 60s was travelling the world in the Royal Navy and seeing at first hand the horrors of the third world. When you have seen crippled children begging then it does make you wonder. Screw Religion.

@rorymercury4519

2 жыл бұрын

@@thesceptic7968 fr screw religions

@felixthecatofficial6793

Жыл бұрын

@@rorymercury4519 have fun in hell!! 😃

@HS-zk5nn

Ай бұрын

My love of biology, evolution and genetics pushed me to get a PhD. Then I became a theist :)

Platypus is a great proof of evolution. a egg-laying mamale

@sombodysdad

3 жыл бұрын

How does that work? What evolutionary mechanism produced the platypus from non-platypus? Please be specific

@StopTeoriomSpiskowym

3 жыл бұрын

@@sombodysdad which evolution mechanism you really know? Do you know the platypus genetic origin?

@sombodysdad

3 жыл бұрын

@@StopTeoriomSpiskowym No one knows its genetic origin. And there isn't any evidence that genetics determines biological form.

@StopTeoriomSpiskowym

3 жыл бұрын

@@sombodysdad which evolution mechanism you really know?

@sombodysdad

3 жыл бұрын

@@StopTeoriomSpiskowym Natural selection, which is the elimination of the less fit in a population. It is differential reproduction due to heritable random, as in chance, mutation. Then there is genetic drift, which also involves those random mutations. Epigenetic which has environmental factors allowing different genes to be expressed. Endosymbiosis events in which one or more organisms live in harmony inside another. Horizontal or lateral gene transfer. None of which has been shown to be able to produce a platypus

You should look up Lake Malawi and the fish that evolved there. Pretty amazing stuff

Holy Koolaid sent me here. Nice place - very informative, I think I'll stay for a bit if you don't mind.

@rationalityrules

6 жыл бұрын

Stay as long as you like Henrik : )

Theirs so many ppl in the comments that are saying god is real 😵‍💫

@pgcthedemon

2 жыл бұрын

(Also I’m not a big Christian person but I believe in evolution and love to learn about dinosaurs and stuff)

Macro evolution is micro evolution over many generations...

@paulrobinson9318

5 жыл бұрын

False. Microevolution is simple adaptation and can go back and forth with changes in the environment. That those variations use material and info already in the Genome means that the Genome carried a SUPLUS of information not the bare requirements evolution espouses. Most variations ate the result of result in lost genetic diversity. Ruin rearrange and replace are the three RS of adaptation Adaptation is the OPPOSITE of evolution but the ONLY "change over time" ever observed. There IS no evidence for evolution in science. Only mythology.

@stickiedmin6508

5 жыл бұрын

@@paulrobinson9318 Funny that the scientists completely disagree with you . . . We should just take *_YOUR_* word for it though, right? We should completely ignore the overwhelming scientific consensus and instead trust what Paul on KZread says? Don't be ridiculous.

@paulrobinson9318

5 жыл бұрын

+@@stickiedmin6508 Certainly DON'T take MY word for it . . . follow the evidence - and that would never lead to evolution. Actually you lie - SOME scientists disagree with me . . . NOT an overwhelming consensus by any standard you want to present; but then those that form a monolithic view in contravention of OBSERVED evidence are NOT "scientists" for there can be NO consensus in science that contracts evidence. Modern "evolutionists" that are honest will admit they haven't a clue about Evolution; how it works or what it can accomplish: The Altenberg 16: An Exposé of the Evolution Industry by Suzan Mazur North Atlantic Books, Berkeley, CA, 2010: “The Altenberg 16 … recognize that the theory of evolution which most practicing biologists accept and which is taught in classrooms today, is inadequate in explaining our existence [emphasis added]” (p. 19). “A wave of scientists now questions natural selection’s role, though fewer will publicly admit it” (p. 20). “Evolutionary science is as much about the posturing, salesmanship, stonewalling and bullying that goes on as it is about actual scientific theory. It is a social discourse involving hypotheses of staggering complexity with scientists, recipients of the biggest grants of any intellectuals, assuming the power of politicians while engaged in Animal House pie-throwing and name-calling: ‘ham-fisted’, ‘looney Marxist hangover’, ‘secular creationist’, ‘philosopher’ (a scientist who can’t get grants anymore), ‘quack’, ‘crackpot’ … ‘A wave of scientists now questions natural selection’s role, though fewer will publicly admit it.’ “In short, it’s a modern day quest for the holy grail, but with few knights. At a time that calls for scientific vision, scientific inquiry’s been hijacked by an industry of greed, with evolution books hyped like snake oil at a carnival. “Perhaps the most egregious display of commercial dishonesty is this year’s celebration of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species-the so-called theory of evolution by natural selection, i.e., survival of the fittest, a brand foisted on us 150 years ago." "“We are grappling with the increasing feeling … that we just don’t have the theoretical and analytical tools necessary to make sense of the bewildering diversity and complexity of living organisms” (from the invitation to attend the Altenberg conference, p. 31). “Basically I don’t think anybody knows how evolution works [emphasis added]” (Jerry Fodor, p. 34). “Oh sure natural selection’s been demonstrated … the interesting point, however, is that it has rarely if ever been demonstrated to have anything to do with evolution in the sense of long-term changes in populations. … Summing up we can see that the import of the Darwinian theory of evolution is just unexplainable caprice from top to bottom. What evolves is just what happens to happen [ellipsis in original]” (Stanley Salthe, p. 21). " NOTHING about Evolution is provable - even by the falsely claimed "consensus" of propaganda masters ( you term is scientists) Soft tissue and C14 datings from Hell's Creek destroys the 70 million year extinction myth - NOTHING lasts that long unfossilized - NO c14 should exist - geology destroys the billion year old myth - Mt St Helen's proved that it does NOT take a LONG time to build layers and carve canyons - Dry Falls WA proves that a third of a continent can be altered in a day - given a massive flood - like the one in Genesis - that of course does NOT prevent SOME propagandized scientists from sticking to the now discredited mythology of Lyell and Darwin. And you STILL have no possible source for abiogenesis or the Big Bank - BOTH essential to Evolution. Your mockery is based on outdated mythology and personal ignorance..

@stickiedmin6508

5 жыл бұрын

@@paulrobinson9318 Oh, we're doing the no *_true_* scientist fallacy now are we? All those who agree with you are the *_true_* scientists and everyone else (the overwhelming majority) are making assumptions, telling lies and committing fraud? Please. My challenge still stands. What assumptions were made, what lies were told and what frauds were committed? Try looking somewhere other than creationist propaganda.

@stickiedmin6508

5 жыл бұрын

@@paulrobinson9318 "And you STILL have no possible source for abiogenesis or the Big Bank - BOTH essential to Evolution. " Complete nonsense. Neither of those have *_ANYTHING_* to do with evolution. Nothing.

I met someone who claimed that evolution was absolutely false (and that I'm stupid, for some reason) because the fact that fruit flies doesn't become bison doesn't make sense and that the fact that evolution takes "a sh*t ton of time" (I used really simple terms because I figured out that I was talking to an ignorant) to develope new life forms wasn't "scientific enough".

New sub here. Came over from HKA.