I think the reason these guys had 80 accuracies is because you are forcing them to make a lot of only moves or very logical easy to see defending moves. All it takes is a couple inaccuracies and you exploit it the rest of the game. Also I find your thinking out loud commentary very beneficial as a 1300. Even when I was 800 a couple years ago I find your explanations and reasoning very easy to follow and relatable. You definitely got a good sense of reality and good at teaching. You are the type that could have success teaching anything not just chess

@ChessVibesOfficial

11 ай бұрын

Appreciate that!

I feel like with this series Nelson is becoming the Bob Ross of Chess! Also if I’ve gained any elo this week it’s because of these vids!

Great video I learned some tactics! The thing with the 80% accuracy is when you are beating people up and basically forcing moves on them, it’s ‘the best move’ so their accuracy goes up. Like your neat checkmate at the very end. Those were forced, and also the best moves upping their accuracy. I’m not really highly rated but I play a friend of mine. That’s 500 elo below me minimum, and she gets like 75%-80% on games against me, yet against her same strength players she gets like 55%-70%. Anyway fun video as always thanks! Have a great day everyone! :)?

In my experience 500 700 has been playing really well. They doesnt see many tactics, but they know very well the principles. I believe channels like yours have been very instructive.

Hey Nelson, don't rush to the higher ratings. The Chess learning is still very useful (not obvious) for us

I don't feel so bad being stuck at 600 - 650 range there are some great players in this range. This series has been super helpful, thanks so much!

With the 2nd to last game the 0 blunders is more impressive than the 80 imo.

1:35 Brilliant thought process. I never would have saw all of those disadvantages to simply trading equal pieces.

How to win 56 in a row? Be leagues ahead of them in elo

@DanielSong39

11 ай бұрын

It's still amusing to watch him run over them over and over again You'll see him stumble with the occasional draw or loss pretty soon, maybe even next video Some "800"'s are actually 2000+ rated players who just got started

@sonicwaveinfinitymiddwelle8555

11 ай бұрын

@@DanielSong39 it happens rarely like REALLY rarely. I think there might be less than 1 in 100-200 thousand chance to match someone genius who started out just few days ago per 1 try edit: someone using cheat engine is much more probably to happen

@Tocinos

11 ай бұрын

He'll start to find cheaters at 1900

@sonicwaveinfinitymiddwelle8555

11 ай бұрын

@@Tocinos how would cheaters even get to 1900 before creating 47 alternative accounts?

@bsjam78

11 ай бұрын

Yes “how”, he explains every move.

Just clambered back above 1000 after dropping back down to ~950 for awhile. Still finding watching the lower ratings games helpful and interesting to watch.

Nelson - I'm watching a lot of your tutorials. You're very concise and to the point without wild wacky gestures and getting off point. You don't ramble or hem/haw something I find irksome in young adults. I'm retired and like to stay busy so why not learn CHESS ? I always have 2 different sites open so I can hop back and forth and I keep a chess notepad file and fill it in with things you say to watch for and be aware of. Some one on her said you' d make a great teacher - and not just this discipline. Thanks !

This series is incredibly helpful. Thankyou so much!

Love the clarity of your explanation of your tactics...very helpful.

In low elo like this, you should show how you can easily fall for the Englund Gambit.

I really like how your explain your thought process. Great job!

This series is such a blessing, i dont know if there is any content like this, this is huge help, thank you so much and God bless

I love this series! Keep going. This really helps

Your analysis is extremely helpful!

Opponent: “This guy is already wasting all his time, I must be destroying this dude right now.” Nelson: “So there’s 11 different ways I can obliterate my opponent here. This move would be checkmate, but is there anything better.”

i have a challenge play against martin but replace the selected piece every 3 move by spinning a wheel choosing what to select and to replace it with which piece pawns can promote and pawns on 1st rank have the same condition as the pawn on2nd rank GOOD LUCK!

Fun mate in that last game👍🏻 Thanks for the fun series.

Loving these videos!

this video is so wonderfully well made and edited! wow.

Yo thanks for explaining this video as you do. Best one yet / my favorite

The way you explain each step and what's going on in your mind is very interesting. Keep it coming. Love from India :)

this series is more helpful than any chess videos ive watched

Q: If checkmate is delivered using a rook, a bishop and a pawn. Is there any advantage to determining that the mate was a 9 point win ? ( r 5+ b 3+ p 1 ) Or would that be purely a statistical interest? The mating patterns could be quantified. Average win could be 7.5 , but the avg loss may be 8.25. It may show something ???

Yesterday I surpassed the 1700 elo. I can see that it’s getting much more difficult to ”become better”. If anyone has any tips please comment🙌

@justinkeefe3456

11 ай бұрын

Wow fantastic! 1700 is no small feat! I’d assume it gets exponentially harder as you go up. Going up like 50 elo now is probably close to as hard as gaining 300 if you we’re an 800. Shoot at 300 you’d be a 2000. I’m like 500 below you though so don’t listen to me haha. Again well done my friend

@arrowofkira5658

11 ай бұрын

Congrats, yeah I'm at 1600 and face the same issue, if you wanna get better from that point on you have to do more than you did in the past. Tactics are getting sharper, people know theory and stop blundering more obvious stuff. Imo identifying your weaknesses and strengths compared to other players of your rating is the first thing you have to figure out and then you see how much time and energy you wanna invest in getting better. If you're below average on tactics doing more puzzles will help eventually, if you don't know as much theory just study openings and/or endgames. Hope any of this helps you ❤

@CreatureDomain

11 ай бұрын

1600 here

@nobodylovesditto

11 ай бұрын

Nice! I hit 800 last night so clearly I'm halfway there! My advice is to capture the opponent's king. Yes, that's sarcasm. Seriously though, well done

@JustAnotherCommenter

11 ай бұрын

@@justinkeefe3456 Ironically, seems like we did listen to you

At 26:18 if you took the black pawn with the bishop first, when black recaptures with his bishop you could then recapture his bishop and pawn with your pawn forking the rook and queen. Yes he could try to move away but it would cause a lot of trouble and disruption making him try to save 2 pieces.

I wonder at which rating you'll get your first loss

@satgurs

11 ай бұрын

probably in the 1000 to 1500 range if i had to guess

@s--cn8ee

11 ай бұрын

@@satgurs I'm 1500 There's no way he's going to lose to less than 1900 even with this rating range the chances of them winning are very slim to non-existent

Opponent: Damn why my opponent take so long to move His opponent: *forecasting his move to his viewer so his viewer can learn while watching*

7:55 Qh4 looks like an extremely passive move. Qf3 threatens Qxf7# and I'm having difficulty seeing how black would stop that.

@megauser8512

11 ай бұрын

I think that black could play f6 and get a queen trade if white takes that pawn.

@danielyuan9862

11 ай бұрын

I almost commented that too but f5 miraculously stops everything.

@reubenmanzo2054

11 ай бұрын

@@danielyuan9862 So it does because the e4 pawn is now pinned. Fair enough.

The reason they play well is because they see themselves as being rated higher than you and therefore think they are better than you. The placebo effect

Video idea: you play against Martin but you can’t lose pawns

In the last game around 40:25 was Bxf7+ an option after black played Rc8? It forks the queen on g6 and if black takes with the rook you have Rxc8+ followed by Qxh3 🤔

Around the 19 min mark he's basically drooling at all the good moves he has in front of em 😂😂😂

Hi Nelson, i realy like your video’s and they help me allot! My rating went from 650 to 750! Can you play the haxo gambit in a future video?🤔👍

Mr. Nelson can you play the French Defense or the Caro-Kann next video?

at 38:00 in game 4 did you consider bishop d5? it attacks the rook and the knight can't take it because of the pin on the queen. I may be missing something there but it was unexpected to not hear you talk through it as an idea at least

29:26 He sacrificed... THE ROOOOOOOOOOK!!!!!!!

The opponents are getting better, to the point where I think Chess Vibes would lose the majority of games with queen odds and would have a real challenge even with rook odds Against

Try play Queen Gambit's Beth Harmon in 650-700 rank.

I Been Stuck In The 600s For A While Now 😂😂😂

I can't find the continuation of this video. Seems they aren't uploaded serially. Please can you clarify or share me a link to the next Appreciate you man

As the player base in chess gets better all around, all players end up playing better, which makes it so that accuracy goes up for lower ratings. It's especially noticeable at the mid ranges. We've seen this in Fight Games for years, where when a game first releases all ranks, even top ranks, make a lot of mistakes, and after five years or so the top players are almost perfect in their plans and execution. This is the same story, just with general audience education being the primary driving factor instead of raw time limiting people's experience with the game. So as more good chess educators make good chess training and strategy available to more people, lower rated players will objectively perform better and people in the mid range who do not improve will see a drop in their personal rating.

Can you play the the caro kann or the vienna gambit?

Try to get all the opening Also your content makes me happy 😊 thank you❤

At about 4:30 mark- I can tell you for a fact that at 600 rated chess, if you had pushed the E pawn, the opponent would have taken it with the queen thinking it was a free pawn.

I guess with accuracy it doesn’t necessarily represent the complexity of a game. Some games seem to follow more obvious routes after say a mistake where one side loses a piece early, and then a bunch of trades happen. I’ve noticed when reviewing my own games that even if I’m down material the engine often gives the stamp of approval to trading pieces. Whereas other games can be so labyrinthian to navigate, like walking a tight rope where there are bad moves and blunders all over the place, with few good moves available to hunt down. I must admit though a few of these players have played very very well, but one or two do make me a little suspicious. Will be interesting to see if any accounts get closed later. Maybe it’s just the numbering system implying the skill gaps are bigger than the reality. Scary thought.

0:38 it's the Hambleton variation

Me nodding at my screen not understanding a single thing he just said

As far as 500-600 playing better then rated, I don't know. I'm currently in that range. I had 2 games with 90%, 1 was 70%. (Recently) Some days I'm not in in but sometimes I'm destroying. I can beat bots at about 1300-1400. I've also had game review score me 1500-2000+ at times so.... don't know. I'm thinking something is off.

@todddalton4579

11 ай бұрын

Honestly the estimate overshoots by like 500 points. Site thinks I played like a 2200 when I'm only 1550 in rapid. It was a very short game though (23 moves)

@SawyerSulzener

11 ай бұрын

I'm similar. I am rated roughly 630 in Rapid, but can defeat 1300 (occasionally 1400 rated bots.).

@shaggysunshine7441

11 ай бұрын

@todddalton4579 still means I should be in 1000-1500 not 500-600. I think a lot of higher ratings somehow got stuck at low elos lol think their algorithm might be off

@SawyerSulzener

11 ай бұрын

@@shaggysunshine7441 There's no "algorithm". The only system is the elo rating system, which isn't faulty unless you've only played like 0-20 games. This particular system functions using a mathematical formula. As Todd said, the game evaluation often overshoots, but even if not, it only evaluates your one game performance.

@shaggysunshine7441

11 ай бұрын

@sacreligioussneetch6045 I do play "24 hour" games my elo is going up there lately. I beat 1000s there. I am 500-600 rapid.

How can i play with you?

9:44 "This diagonal for the rook" 💀

7:55 why not Qf3 with possibility of Qxf7+?

35:13 if they move the king and you take the rook with the queen thats mate is it not? He played the game about as well as he could have other than not pressuring you in the beginning allowing you to set up and ruining pawn structure

@charlesr7269

10 ай бұрын

Correction mate in 2 as he would move the king to H8 and then you follow with queen to G8

I reached 1600 .

Me seeing a new video of Nelson *Stares at download button*

@fn_cxrsed2984

11 ай бұрын

Romans 6:23 states that the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. 1 . 1

@josephsalmonte4995

11 ай бұрын

​@@fn_cxrsed2984I like the parts that emphatically states the Bible is allegorical.

@glazedyeti2993

11 ай бұрын

@@josephsalmonte4995 where does it say that?

These 600's are so much better than I am at 950....

Peter is so much better. He plays like NM

@DanielSong39

11 ай бұрын

Yeah this version of Peter would crush Average Joe But no one can beat Bobby Fischerman, he catches Stockfish for fun and plays with his cat Mittens

@qazzaqstan

11 ай бұрын

I mean Peter now has the ELO of a chess engine so winning 56 games in a row seems about right.

@DanielSong39

11 ай бұрын

@@qazzaqstan Until the berries wear off that is

imo a lot of 600s play very well now, almost feels like theres some kind of rating inflation going on

@arrowofkira5658

11 ай бұрын

Yeah i think because a lot of instructive chess content is out there on yt people now at 500 are better than 500's a couple years ago. How much better idk, but i think there's a difference compared to the past.

@scoutbane1651

11 ай бұрын

You mean rating *deflation. Since the same rating means more than before. Inflation would be the opposite.

How do you have this type of vision… damn

While in American English 'en Passant in British English we use the French pronunciation en passan as in French the t at the end is silent

+36 elo with 56 wins? What

i am currently 635 elo rating only...

Like your channell mostly. But I have an idea how you won 56 games in a row. It was by playing under an assumed identity with a rating 1/4 of your real rating. That is a pretty sure fire way to get a winning record

Has anyone ever told you that you kind of sound like Owen Wilson

I also looked at C4, but I discounted it because I thought the resulting position was just too explosive. 🙄 soz...I'll get my coat...

36:45 yeah I definitely got the feeling this one was cheating.

At 40:00... did you overlook bxf7! ? Looks like you will force his queen to take, which gives a queen a bishop and pawn for a bishop and rook. He might even blunder and lose more 39:59

@megauser8512

11 ай бұрын

Yeah, but black could take with the rook instead, but if black is not careful, then they could take with their queen and lose their queen.

Why is there someone replying to comments with bible verses

@coldgrumpytree5441

11 ай бұрын

Bot just ignore it lol

Nelson ur better than me even when u on purposely blunder

@fn_cxrsed2984

11 ай бұрын

Romans 6:23 states that the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. 1 . 1

how about reaching 2000 from 1500 .. most players are 1400 rated.

Im 600 and i just won my first 1600 rated player and stockfish said i played like a 2100 in the game review 😁

Rook sacrifice to open up the enemy position, very clever !! 28:54

Are u ruy lopez relative

How do you only gain 36 elo in 56 games? That’s less than 1 elo per game?

@dennisjameson6492

4 күн бұрын

This is a series starting from 300 I think.

22:02 wrong! Your a-file rook is not defended by anything :D

@danielyuan9862

11 ай бұрын

A random knight lands on a1.

The last one is Romanian😁

Play a carro khan

Maybe the other 600 players aren't really 600, just like you aren't!

Ruy Lopez (Spanish) bad opening at 600 ELO -too positional at that level.

He missed a checkmate

@someonei

11 ай бұрын

timestamp?

3rd

@fn_cxrsed2984

11 ай бұрын

Romans 6:23 states that the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. 1 . 1

4th

@fn_cxrsed2984

11 ай бұрын

Romans 6:23 states that the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. 1 . 1

@avneeshgipm3073

11 ай бұрын

@@fn_cxrsed2984 your mother

First

@fn_cxrsed2984

11 ай бұрын

Romans 6:23 states that the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. 1 . 1

E

@fn_cxrsed2984

11 ай бұрын

Romans 6:23 states that the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. 1 . 1

@iwishexamsneverhappened

11 ай бұрын

Stop following me

Romans 6:23 states that the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. 1 . 1

7:56 couldn't you have played queen to F3? Or am I missing something

@danielyuan9862

11 ай бұрын

f5