Hey guys :) I see that the first puzzle causes a lot of confusion. That means that I didnt explain it well enough in the video and because of that I want to explain it better now for the people who think that the riddle is illogical or doesnt make sense ;) The only correct answer is the first one. Explanation: All the other objects are missing a trait that is shared by the other four. Explanation 1. The object on the far right has a smaller size from top to bottom than the other four, which share the same size. (Missing size that all the others share) 2. The second from the right is yellow while the other four are red. (Missing color that all the others share) 3. The object which is second from the left is not outlined in green while the other four are. (Missing green outline that all the others share) 4. The object that is second from the left is a circle while the other four objects are quadrilaterals (Missing shape that all the others share) The left most object is the odd one out because it is not missing a visual trait which is shared by the other objects. (Now you could argue that it could also e.g be the middle one because its not outlined. But thats not true. If you look at the group, you see that it is normal in the group to miss one trait that the other objects share. That means, not being outlined(missing one trait) doesnt make the object odd. You dont stand out for missing one trait if everybody else also misses one trait. Only the first one is not missing a trait which is shared by the others. And it is the right answer) I hope it makes sense to everybody now. I tried my best! If you know a better explanation feel free to post it. I actually like that puzzle a lot and I am a bit confused about all the hate against it. Thanks for watching and reading this long explanation :)

@leonkong7817

7 жыл бұрын

Thx, this makes so much more sense. Also great vid

@XXXLmaster

7 жыл бұрын

The first one does not work. As the given solution shows, you can find something that is special for every single one of them (the first one being special for being the only one with no special trait). Odd one out just says that you have to find one piece that does not match a description every other piece does match. First one: Every piece has a unique trait, just the first one hasn't -> First one is odd, valid answer Second one: Every piece is a square, just not the second one -> Second one is odd, valid answer Third one: Every piece has an outline, just not the third one -> Third one is odd, valid answer Fourth one: Every piece is red, just not the fourth one -> Fourth one is odd, valid answer Fifth one: Every piece has roughly the same size, just not the fifth one -> Fifth one is odd, valid answer As there is no real scale of "oddity" for these things, no one is to decide what the single right answer is (with a little exception further into the text), so every one of the listed ones has to be right. If someone has to decide what the right answer is because there are multiple possible answers the question can't be answered by pure logic and thus is flawed. You either have to give additional info based on what kind of oddity you want the questioned people to answer or you have to make sure that all except one piece have something in common with at least one other piece. All this on an non-arbitrary level as "Out of this list, only the second one starts with a letter from the second half of the alphabet" of course, else it won't work ever. But if there are multiple solutions on an almost similar level of complexity, and I would argue this as given in the first picture, one can't figure out one single right answer.

@Digitalfiendscom

7 жыл бұрын

TryToTech78 Exactly. The first "riddle" has multiple answers and is therefore poorly designed.

@DagOdenhall

7 жыл бұрын

The first one is the correct answer because it's the only one you can't easily make an argument for as being the correct answer. You could argue it should be the second one because it's the only one that's round. You could argue it should be the third one because it's the only one not outlined. You could argue it should be the fourth one because it's the only one not red. You could argue it should be the fifth one because it's the only one that's different in size. But because there can only be one right answer, if the last four are all equally valid propositions, none of them can be right. Thus the correct answer is the first. My only issue is that the first four didn't seem sufficiently uniform in size to set apart the fifth.

@stevethorpe

7 жыл бұрын

>> The only correct answer is the first one. No - it is not "the only" correct answer. It is only correct in the context of 'shared traits'. Every other shape can be considered to be the odd one out in some other context, and since the puzzle does not specify the context it is arrogant of the puzzle creator to claim that the the only valid context is the one he had in mind when creating the puzzle. Leaving the context unspecified is a common failing of "odd one out" puzzles, and will always result in arguments.

I didn't solve them all, but I found number 5 to be incredibly easy. I found the other 4 much harder.

@delta3244

7 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I found 5 easy. I found 4 and 3 =ly easy, but there was so much trial and error they weren't too fun to solve :|

@ruan3352

7 жыл бұрын

mateo jones but then you hav two smaller triangles. They must be equivalent

@anatoleh1

7 жыл бұрын

naaah. 3 and 4 were a piece of cake! :)

@xiaozhouyang9256

Жыл бұрын

IKR

In the 1st one, if the first square is the only one without a defining feature, doesn't that give it a defining feature?

@victorvanstyn5819

7 жыл бұрын

Yep. But that makes it a 'better' choice, for some illogical reason..

@jmp_fr

7 жыл бұрын

Victor Van Styn it's weird

@captaintaffy5083

7 жыл бұрын

I think the answer can also be the circle since it has an ODD number of sides while the others has even sides

@EmrikWan

7 жыл бұрын

It can also be the square without an outline and the square that is yellow.

@yajirobi4071

7 жыл бұрын

it's defining feature is still different than the defining features of the others

Why was the last one the easiest??

@SamuelDancingGallew

6 жыл бұрын

i think because you know by then to think outside the box and that the outer numbers are important somehow, but that could just be me

@siddheshkakade2888

6 жыл бұрын

me to I found the last one in just a couple of seconds

@jamminout7671

6 жыл бұрын

Amy Shin to make us feel good

@sprinkle5256

5 жыл бұрын

Because it is ILLUMINATI CONFIRMED

@stylherc

5 жыл бұрын

@@SamuelDancingGallew Think outside the triangle ;-)

Can we just convert the gold bar into money first and then divide it by 4?

@SakshamSinghania

4 жыл бұрын

😎😇😇

@strangefancypants17

2 жыл бұрын

No

@itskittyme

Жыл бұрын

since the dollar doesn't follow the gold standard since 1970, the answer changes every day

The real intelligence test is how to design a good intelligence test

@jeremymcadam7400

7 жыл бұрын

rekt em

@dubaiwaslit9337

6 жыл бұрын

ur nan

@mohammadabumallal7755

2 жыл бұрын

Bruh I can't even solve them

Someone may have said this, but you can divide the gold bar into 4 equal pieces with two cuts.

@paulkennedy8701

7 жыл бұрын

You mean equal including mirror images?

@MrGTN7000

7 жыл бұрын

thats what i thought. inverted T from the tip of the boomerang shaped gold and that will give you 4 triangular pieces.

@paulkennedy8701

7 жыл бұрын

"inverted T from the tip of the boomerang shaped gold" They would be the same shape (right isosceles triangles), but they wouldn't be the same size. The ones at the top would be twice the size of the others. I think ricardo meant cut down from the point to make 2 pentagons (one right-handed and one left-handed) and then slice each one into 2 pieces with a cut parallel to the table.

@unclemunch

7 жыл бұрын

Most are looking at it as a two-dimensional figure. First make one cut parallel to the table (as Paul said), making two equal layers. With the two slices still stacked, cut from the point down. You will have four identical pieces in two cuts.

@SimonGrandell

7 жыл бұрын

Except they wouldn't be identical if you look at the gold bar the sides have a slope. So the two pieces made from the bottom layer would be bigger than the ones made from the top layer.

In the first one, it needs perspective and it can be actually interpreted through different perspectives

@leitis820

2 жыл бұрын

True. Every other figure is a square, except the second one, so it's not an incorrect answer either.

@miguelpanta

2 жыл бұрын

every shape has a blue eadge apart from the middle one. silly.

@leitis820

2 жыл бұрын

@@miguelpanta It doesn't matter lol. it's still a point of perspective, silly.

@miguelpanta

2 жыл бұрын

@@leitis820 yes it is, the task is silly, cause its not clear.

@leitis820

2 жыл бұрын

@@miguelpanta I mean, true. That's why it is pov.

Last one was easiest

3rd problem. Sell the gold in the balck market. Divide the money

@Soupy_loopy

7 жыл бұрын

tangente00, then it's a pretty small piece of gold. I was under the impression it was a larger brick.

@adriandinu1395

7 жыл бұрын

tangente00 then 3 people take 100 and the forth gets 99.98. He'll get used to it it's not that big of a deal lol

@omnigulwillofcrota6189

7 жыл бұрын

i got a different solution, and thats if you cut the bar down the middle, then put the two pieces together to form a rectangle, then cut down the middle of the bar longways

For the gold bar I would.... Kill 1 person and then split the gold bar into 3 Edit: holy cow 74 likes how I never got this much in my lifeee Edit: are you guys crazy why would u like this comment I'm so proud of all of you ;-;

@ButtonMasherReal

7 жыл бұрын

Why not kill three people and keep the entire bar for yourself?

@quindexreal

7 жыл бұрын

y not kill 2 people and cut it in half?

@getthatcat520

7 жыл бұрын

I'd kill all of them using the gold bar

@peterfox1380

7 жыл бұрын

Why not just steal 4 gold bars?

@noaimrazemain

7 жыл бұрын

bcoz the other guys are lazy dumbasses they wouldn't even budge to put it on their backpacks

*How to Solve the Gold Bar Riddle:* Change them to money and split the money by four. Solved! That is the only way to get the exact same amount (without being a professional: gold cutter, mathematician, logician, and miracle maker)

@syedali832

6 жыл бұрын

The people will get suspicious because they will know a gold bat got stolen and people are trying to claim it

@mounanasri4242

6 жыл бұрын

or we can split it in three equal parts ( the three equal parts r obvious there )and then we cut each part to 8 little parts. This way we get 8 x 3 = 24 parts that we can divide by 4, so each person gets 6 parts.

@jacobsong2591

6 жыл бұрын

But at 2:09 he said to not cut it into more than 4 parts because the gold would lose it's worth

@devina8812

6 жыл бұрын

Magically change it.

@lukehayes4027

6 жыл бұрын

Yep the bigger the bar, the more money too

1=F 2=F 3=F 4=F 5=T F*CK YEAH

@malevolution7041

6 жыл бұрын

Let's be real though, the last one was super easy if you could find the pattern in the numbers.

@knightpanic1931

6 жыл бұрын

same thing happened to me

@mgr2563

6 жыл бұрын

Well opposite of me

The gold bar one was made unnecessarily difficult to cut. The video suggests that 6 cuts will need to be made... Three straight line cuts is all that you need... Cut the bar in half on the thin plane to get two L shapes with the exact same dimensions as each other. Now cut these pieces in half by cutting along the axis of symmetry. You will end up with four identical pieces. The first one is questionable and not specific enough. You really need to step up your game...

@lsedge7280

7 жыл бұрын

I agree with your creative solution to the gold bar. The first one is specific enough it has only one viable outcome. You can argue all of the others are the odd one out, because of them having a unique trait, thus they follow a pattern. That pattern excludes the first shape making it the odd one out.

@a1tre680

7 жыл бұрын

your L shapes do not have the same dimensions

@quintenboosje2437

7 жыл бұрын

Cameron Rudolph gold bars in fiction are usually shaped like this /___\ , if you cut it like you said, the top "L" would be less than the bottom "L". also in the video the way the bar is drawn dies point in the direction of the /___\ shape

@feelfreefpv

7 жыл бұрын

To just get peices equal in size I can do it in two cuts (the last cut being made over both the first pieces after rearanging). They does not become equal in shape though.

@theholytrinity8528

7 жыл бұрын

Cameron Rudolph I thought of that, but apparently that's invalid

The first riddle is dumb (unsolvable): So one is a circle ( ok that’s different) One is very small ( well that’s different) One has another color ( that’s different too) One has no border (guess what ... That’s different too) And one is literally different from all of the above. The goal here is to find one with a different trait from all of the others or , said differently, find one wich does not have a trait that the others have in common, wich is true for every objet here. I hope I was clear enough.

@DerLamer

7 жыл бұрын

If you count "does not have any unique traits" as a unique trait, then its unique trait is also that it's a paradox. So it has two unique traits - it's a paradox, and its unique trait is not having unique traits. But that means it's the only object with two unique traits, making it have 3, and 4, and 5... infinite unique traits. The only object with that many unique traits. The others are all different in one regard, while the first is different in infinitely many. That's what makes it truly unique.

@danhibiki2

7 жыл бұрын

Just imagine being put in a room full of mentally ill people The first puzzle is just like that. The first shape doesnt belong there because it has no special characteristics.

@shieldgenerator7

7 жыл бұрын

The riddle said "find the odd one out" not the one with the unique trait. Maybe slight wording difference helps make that clearer

@wastedwally

7 жыл бұрын

Shroomy agreed buddy

@diamonddog2638

7 жыл бұрын

+Yayo.chan That is totally different. If you are comparing the mental state of a mentally ill (or even just mental disabilities for this matter), person and a "sane" person, then of course you would be the odd one out. Your example is like comparing different shapes that are all red to a red banana there's an obvious difference becuase they are NOTHING alike. However, the shape dilema is different. Using the "mentally ill" example again, instead of comparing the mental state, compare the mental disabilities. One person, the "sane" person, has something simple like a small case of dyslexia, one has OCD, one has ADHD, one has Autism, and one has Tourettes. Arguably, most would probably say that of those examples the dyslexia is the least "severe". So, the "sane" person would be the odd one out right? No. Becuase it's still a disorder. At that, it's classified under a "learning" disability just like ADHD, Autism, and Tourettes can be. So, OCD, right? Well, no. Because OCD is a disorder you can "develop" (while I'm aware genetics also play a role). Just like certain forms of Tourettes. So, maybe Autism? No. Because just like ADHD and Tourettes, you are born with it and most symptoms start during very early childhood. Tourettes? Nope. Tourettes is linked with other disorders sucj as OCD and ADHD. So, while one might stand out right away, just as the shapes, if you look deeper into it, then they all are unique, similar, and different in their own ways while also ALL being able to be classified into a group... (Alright. Mental disorders was a terrible comparison to just shapes. You get the basic idea though).

You told us the last one was the hardest just to make us feel better...

picture 3: Or, OR! rather than that way with tons of unnecessary cuts, once through the middle, and cut it sideways aligned with the 270 degree corner in the middle.

@falconbaker8553

6 жыл бұрын

Veji that’s what I said

@Parnder

6 жыл бұрын

I said that too

@frenchflaccotv6800

6 жыл бұрын

Since I thought the gold bar was big I just thought cut it four times horizontal they would all have the same shape. the original shape

@jackr.5200

6 жыл бұрын

That doesn't work, the two top triangles are larger than the two bottom ones. If you think about the shape as 3 squares, you can see that the bottom triangles get half of a square and the top two get 2 halves each.

@asmahappy6373

6 жыл бұрын

Veji yes. You are my FRIEND!!!!

wow I'm dumb... whatever * keeps browsing internet *

I only got the last one

@noraweeb6679

6 жыл бұрын

lucas breuer same

@riptide-RahulRaj

6 жыл бұрын

Me too

@katoffuture8728

6 жыл бұрын

I *only* got the last one.

@kiwigod241

6 жыл бұрын

Same lol

@plumey6278

6 жыл бұрын

Same

The last one may have been easier for two reasons: 1.It's designed for a different kind of intelligence,like the goldbar thing being for more visual people and the last one more mathemathical. 2. He tried to make you feel better by saying was the hardest but really was the easiest, make you feel better after failing all of the others.

My dear friend, when you deal with quadratics, that last question is child’s play

For the third, i came up with a different answer i tought that you could cut the bar in half in the horizontal way (like a piece of bread when you make a sandwich) and the cut those pieces in half on the vertical way

@yadadstrousers7678

7 жыл бұрын

CookieMonster ohhhhhh yeeeeeeaaaaaah

@Aiur2000

7 жыл бұрын

that's exactly how i thought it should be done too. Then I saw their answer and...wtf, why is their solution so complicated?

@yeosef5984

7 жыл бұрын

That's what I thought too but then again it said all should be identical. By doing that you have 2 pairs of the same shapes but those two pairs are different from one another. All should be the same shapes.

@gali2226

7 жыл бұрын

Jinyoung Hyung is Fab but they're both right angled with 45degs triangles?

@bagpiper117

7 жыл бұрын

Just weight the bar and cut it according to that. Duh.

On the 3rd one, I was thinking that you cut it vertically, or into 4 layers, But that would mean that each layer would be very thin.

The worst part of this puzzle was the scary version of Fur Elise playing in the background.

How can you cut this gold bar into 4 identical peices? Technically, with a knife after heating it.

i got them all correct except for the gold bar . my answer to the gold bar was sell it on the black market and everybody gets a 25% cut lmaaoo

@jacksonfrost9714

7 жыл бұрын

Beenaamous Sur thats what i thought

@mpiklo697458

7 жыл бұрын

Jackson Frost we on the same level broo haha ✋👊

#1 doesn't work. It's not odd. To be odd, there has to be a contrast to something regular.

@hanibalelgaraffa2642

7 жыл бұрын

thought the same

@roydamari106

7 жыл бұрын

Exactly, by that logic the circle is odd cause it's the only circle, the middle square is odd cause it's the only one not outlined in blue, the yellow square is odd cuase it's the only different color, you can't just decide the one odd thing you thought of to be the only thing.

@zahidshabir4038

7 жыл бұрын

that one was BS i thought that there could be multiple one's such as the circle being odd one out or the yellow square as the colour differs and then went with the square without the outline due to the others having a blue outline also his logic saying the last one is smaller than the first one I could say the first one is larger than the last one

@delta3244

7 жыл бұрын

I kinda agree with you, but with #1: -The normal was the most common occurrence (blue outline, square, red) -There was only one that was exactly like that -The others were all off by exactly 1 ∴ The ''normal'' one is the most odd in the group. This is kind of like how it's very abnormal for there to be a 'normal' person in existence in a given city.

@riddlechannel3270

7 жыл бұрын

You are right, the regular thing is that every object has an individual trait. However the first one doesnt. And by being totally normal, the first one doesnt fit into the group :)

I only got the last one right

@buysave3351

6 жыл бұрын

Me too #noOldComments

Yoo, I solved them all! The matches riddle was a little confusing because you had to actually touch two matches in order to create a minus. The vertical match could not be lifted without either touching the horizontal one or carefully pulling it out, without the upper one to roll away. Great video. :)

@DeathnoteBB

9 ай бұрын

Haha, I don’t think you can’t literally move any other matches, you just can’t use more than one’s new position in an answer

Hey, its so crazy! I started this channel 7 weeks ago and I am overwhelmed by the support this channel already gets. I am so glad that you like the videos although I am still in the process of learning how to make them better and better. I want to send a BIG "Thank You" to everybody here, you are awesome!! And I really hope you enjoy todays video. See you! :*

@Smeric

7 жыл бұрын

You are awesome too!! ;)

@retrahsado4649

7 жыл бұрын

Its an original cool content with the drawings and stuff, as long as you dont run out of riddles, I am gonna keep following your content XD

@TheCicada

7 жыл бұрын

These are great riddles! I can't stop watching your videos! BTW, I got numbers 2, 4, and 5 right

@delta3244

7 жыл бұрын

Yeah, keep it up! Funny thing is, I got only 4 & 5 right, although I just didn't want to take the time for 3... I was too lazy :D I did encounter 2 before this as well

@notnoah-

7 жыл бұрын

Riddle Channel i like your channel, i got it from Thadeuz ( grüße gehen raus ) and got notifications on :) I dont know why but i couldnt get one except of the hardest. Keep up ~

How do we know that the fitst is normal, because there is no other object that confirms that you can not state that!

@ioulios12

6 жыл бұрын

All of the objects apply to some rules and reject 1 rule! The first object doesn't reject a rule!

I love how people say that the riddle is stupid when in fact they are just too stupid to solve it...

I found an easier solution for 3. Think of a square, then cut 2 diagonal lones from corner to corner like an 'X'. Turn the square 45° left or right and remove the bottom piece. Ta'da! If you want to go deeper if the edges are rounded or sloped, you'll have to understand how big the rounded edge is, or what the degrees are if sloped, then shave off the edge, then cut the remaining gold shavings into 4 pieces.

Okay but the first one is bullshit

@Alex-if2qt

7 жыл бұрын

the real correct one is the one without an outline

@G5568H

7 жыл бұрын

Numberoneugly Or the circle

@jooot_6850

7 жыл бұрын

What he doesnt take into account is that people look at things differently. He looks at the one that stands out the least and calls it the one that stands out and says that's the only answer, which is bullshit.

@st0rmforce

7 жыл бұрын

I got the answer in about 10 seconds.

@bobtherhino3200

7 жыл бұрын

exactly, because you can reverse the order and his 'solution' would be true for the small rectangle

I disliked, because there were actually multipuple answers to some of those and you only showed one!

@retmarut4499

7 жыл бұрын

may you give examples? and please don't mention the first one, as it already has been discussed plenty of times. even Riddle Channel made a post clarifying the answer on this one. furthermore, just rotating or mirroring the solution for the second picture doesn't count either

@ryanmcfarlen4130

7 жыл бұрын

ret marut he was teasing you about spelling "multiple" like "multipuple"

@retmarut4499

7 жыл бұрын

I see. What does "multipuple" mean? Never heard this word.

@shadowcloud1994

7 жыл бұрын

Well aside the first one which has only correct solutions and the third one where multiple solutions were shown, you can solve the second one by cutting in the middle and stacking it (and cutting a second time). And for the third, well... very technically 20 is still a solution just a much worse one that 43.

@retmarut4499

7 жыл бұрын

shadowcloud1994 the first riddle has exactly one correct answer which was given in the video. with cutting I assume you refer to the third riddle. if you cut it in half and then stack it to cut it in any other direction, you won't get identical pieces. as for the last one: well, 20 wouldn't explain the changes of the outer numbers. you see, all your criticisms are plain wrong.

Why am I so stupid when I do these?!

Timer:5,4,3,2,~~ Me:*OH FOR FUCK SAKE*

@bamsibaligi

5 жыл бұрын

Kan-edgy

the hardest one was not that hard

@Paul-jt9ub

7 жыл бұрын

me to i did wrong all but the last one,i did the last one under 10 seconds

The first riddle immediately discredits the video. And the explanation in the comments doesn't change that. The problem is not that the answer was not explained well enough, it's that the criteria for being different was not explained. The three middle ones are all alternative answers. The circle is the only circle, the middle one is the only non outlined shape, and the yellow square is the only shape of that color. The explanation in the comments is really shitty too. If the unique thing about a shape is not having uniqueness, then that in itself makes it unique.

@a1tre680

7 жыл бұрын

"which is the odd one out?" individual traits: 1: none = 0 2: circle = 1 3: no frame = 1 4: yellow = 1 5: small = 1 makes sense to me

@victorvanstyn5819

7 жыл бұрын

I completely agree. I did not bother with the rest of the video after seeing how flawed the very first one was. Is this a troll channel?Allegedly over half of people attempting it did not arrive at the 'correct' solution within sixty seconds, yet my completely valid choice after less than ten seconds of choice C (no blue outline) is not considered valid in the video or comments with no sensible explanation why the choice A is more valid (than choice C, or either the other two B or D for that matter, as you and others have pointed out). Having no common trait with the other options is itself unique.

@cyril3793

7 жыл бұрын

A1tre All of the others have some difference, but that cube on the right is the *ONLY* one that looks like that, we don't have any criteria of what is the original cube or which one is "normal"

@cyril3793

7 жыл бұрын

A1tre Therefore the one on the left is unique, so every single one of these could have been an answer

@OGEdger

7 жыл бұрын

_"Which one of these objects does not belong to the group?"_ What is there _not_ to understand? It makes absolute sense!

I got only the last one. "And here's the hardest one" 😂👌

The last one is hard because 6 X 2 + g = 21, therefore g = 9

@farahinnisa2116

2 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣😂😂

6 minutes, 48 views, 5 likes!! This guy is great

The Third you could also dit It horizontal So It would become flatter

Illuminati conformed. On the last riddle the triangles look like the illuminati!!!! ☺

43 is the maximum amount of nuggets you can't get at mcdonals... McDonalds = Illuminati confirmed

1 That's not... that's not...fair!! That's not fair!!! All of them have something different except for... ...OOOOHHHHHH!!!! My answer: Far left

@patrickechols8858

7 жыл бұрын

2 I know it's about going outside the box but I can't solve of without thinking of my password

@patrickechols8858

7 жыл бұрын

3 Ok so that one... leaves 3 pieces... ... That one leaves four pieces Maybe I'm in to something... My answer: 3D cut in half horizontally and vertically. wait

@patrickechols8858

7 жыл бұрын

4 OK so I know this one EASY i look at electric clocks a lot My answer: take the plus, make it a minus, and turn the six into an eight

@patrickechols8858

7 жыл бұрын

Didn't think I COULD find more

@patrickechols8858

7 жыл бұрын

5 hmm hmmm. Hmmmmm. Hmmmmmmm! Hmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!! Illuminati HHHMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!¡!!!!!!!!!111!!!!!/lIÌÏĪÎÍ!!!

Okay, the first and the last one doesn't make sense mathematically. Find the odd one based on what property? If you don't specify I can come up with an arbitery property and make any of them the odd one, for exmaple I draw a vertical line after the forth shape and say that the odd one is the fifth because that's the only one standing right of the line, or I pick a number which is slightly smaller then the area of the largest one and call the largest shape the odd one because that's the only shape the area of which exceeds that number. And talking about the last one any number can be correct. Let's say the numbers at the vertices of the triangle are the variables of the function f. So basically all we know is that: f(1,3,7)=22 and f(9,6,2)=21. And I'm sure there are at least continuum many functions that satisfty these conditions so I can just pick any of them, they don't even have to be real valued or their range doesn't even have to be numbers at at all I could replace the question mark with a god damn cat and still be correct. You picked a relatively simple "pattern" (function) f(x,y,z)= yz+x which is perfectly okay, but that's not the only good solution.

@MyFavorites791

7 жыл бұрын

The last one is fine, and you're incorrect that there are a 'continuum' of answers. We can easily go through each and come up with a sum, difference, product etc. and the only one that, for both, come out to the correct answers is (from top clockwise, y, x, z) is xz+y. It's not about the individual, it's about pattern solving. It's a classical IQ test as IQ tends to attempt to deduce your ability not to solve complicated problems, but pick up on patterns within numbers. You get graded well on the former, you get admitted into MENSA for the latter. (Yay, MENSA, so useful) The first one is mentally stupid, though.

@en8042

7 жыл бұрын

Alright, but who told you you can only use the four basic mathematical operations? You have to realize that these operations are nothing but functions, specifically +: R^2 ->R, where R is the set of real numbers. And they didn't specify which pattern I have to find. If it's still not clear then try to continue this series: 2,4,... Well, if you write 6 you're correct because you add 2 to the previous number but 8 can also be correct if you look at it as a geometric series. Or 16 is fine as well if you always square the previous number of the series. And I can easily come up with a pattern which makes 10 correct for the third number too. I know it sounds strange and it's a bit forced but as a mathematician I just wanted to point out that this problem is mathematically not well defined, though in everyday life it's perfectly fine.

@MyFavorites791

7 жыл бұрын

I get you, this guy doesn't define his riddles properly. A better question for the last would have been: Find which basic operation is used to complete the third example. Even that has a few problems, but it's better than 'WATS THE 3RD ONE GUYS?' I recognized it for what it was because of IQ tests that I took as a kid which is... Well, needless to say IQ tests aren't about intelligence at a certain point.

@onokr705

7 жыл бұрын

Zoltan what teh heck is ur solution?

@onokr705

7 жыл бұрын

Zoltan what other answers could there possibly be? I'd like to know

well those were 4 minutes of my life I'm never gonna get back

I actually thought you would have to simply cut triangles lmao

In the gold bar one, you could just have cut it in 1 straight row in the middle from both ways, that would have costed you less time cutting and also simplified the cutting.

@bryanwoods3373

6 жыл бұрын

Cut from the left point to the right point, which should cross the center point to leave one big triangle and two small ones. Bisect the large one vertically to turn that one into two smaller triangles. Should be four equal sized triangles.

@jackr.5200

6 жыл бұрын

No, the two triangles on the top are twice as large as the bottom ones. If you think about the shape as 3 squares put together you can see that the bottom shapes each get half of the area of one square and the top two get the same area as one of the 3 squares.

the hardest one was the only one I got right so I think it's the easied one lol

@st0rmforce

7 жыл бұрын

It was spectacularly easy. I didn't need to pause.

I think for the first one, it'd be more reasonable to pick the square in the middle because it's the only one without the blue frames, rather than the first one being "not odd"; therefore, making it stand out.

@arentol7

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, but isn't the yellow one just as odd, and the small one, and the circle one? In fact, the only one that is not odd is the one on the left, because it is the only one that shares all four traits, size, shape, color, and border state, with 4 of the 5 pictures. The others all have one trait that they share with 0 of the four, making them all equally odd. Only the left picture is unequally odd, making it the most odd.

Cutting the gold makes it worth no less.

solution 3 is wrong because the sides are beveled and by cutting it like that the middle down part would be the heaviest then comes the one above and then the two side ones would be identical so wrong again

@22slice

7 жыл бұрын

Crushonius so you would take the middle one and not tell them, right?

@ChavvyChannel

7 жыл бұрын

How about this, cut from the to centre corners, now we have two even mirrored pieces. Now cut through the pieces from left to right on the other axis, assuming this gold bar is 3d.

@morrockfly

6 жыл бұрын

Just cut them in an upside down T pattern, everyone gets a triangle each

Ironically, the last one ended up being the easiest one for me. lol

2:17 i don i cut the other three guys and keep the gold for myself MWAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA

All of them are squares except for the circle, doesn't that count? Not the colour, or the outline, but the shape itself.

@mandavister

7 жыл бұрын

Every piece has one unique thing but the first. One is a circle, one has no border, one is yellow and one is small. Only the first doesn't have a unique thing and that makes it unique. So, no - circle doesn't count. But don't worry - I also only got it when he explained it.

@pearidotty

7 жыл бұрын

guy from the neighborhood yeah it's unique it's red and outlined it's different from the rest, the answer should be the middle square because all the other shapes are outlined

@MartinPoulter

7 жыл бұрын

It's unique because it's red and outlined??? Look at the other shapes.

@ButtonMasherReal

7 жыл бұрын

+Scorpio Snake But the question didn't ask for "individual traits" as well, it just asked you what the most different one to the rest of the group was. It could have been any of them.

@yeosef5984

7 жыл бұрын

It asked for the odd man out. All 4 except the first share something in common and that is that they possess individual traits so the odd man out is the first.

got them all right except for the gold bars for that I came up with my own solution, cut the bar down the middle you have 2 equal pieces then find the the 45 degree angle and cut straight to the opposite side's 90 degree angle and tada you have 4 equal triangular gold pieces. So I count that one I got right as well

@josecasillas4081

7 жыл бұрын

That's the exact solution I came up with lol. Nice. For the gold bar problem I mean.

@jimmicrackhead12

7 жыл бұрын

wont work

@TangoNevada

2 жыл бұрын

Nope

Got everything right, except for the gold bar...

I had a different solution for the gold bar. Simply cut it horizontally so that you end up with 4 pieces of equal thickness.

0:32 WHERES THE, THODD1SOUT FANS?!?!?!?!?!

@randyyeh7576

6 жыл бұрын

i am here for you my family

@serbianspaceforce6873

6 жыл бұрын

Zia Martin ayyyyyyeeee

@falconbaker8553

6 жыл бұрын

Lol right here

@TheONLYFeli0

6 жыл бұрын

H i

I did not get any right 😔

@jimmicrackhead12

7 жыл бұрын

thats why you are here

why are the hardest ones are the ones i can easily solve while the first ones i cant.

i don't think those robbers should be able to cut gold-

On the gold bar one, you can do it in 2 strokes, one horizontally across the middle, making 2 identical triangles and one big one, then cut the big one in half, forming 2 triangles of equal length to the others

@karttikeyaagarwal8671

4 жыл бұрын

I thought of it exactly like this. But after noticing it carefully makes our answer wrong. The upper one big triangle after getting cut into half will not create same triangles as below ones. Upper ones will be greater than down ones.

For the third one all I did was, 1. Cut the piece horizontally in the middle, so now you have 2 identical pieces of the same size 2. Cut both of the pieces right in the middle 3. DONE! You've got your 4 identical pieces shared between 4 people

@epicnessbrian5295

7 жыл бұрын

i got dat one too! :D

@SquidllerTheLordOfSquids

7 жыл бұрын

Mysterious Person One of the edges will be sloped from the cut

@drewc9972

6 жыл бұрын

First of all, no if you cut it horizontally you get three, not four. But if you cut it vertically which I think you mean you get two trapezoids. And if you cut them in he middle you get either a square and a smaller trapezoid or a big and small different size trapezoids

@vanpham9969

6 жыл бұрын

Drew Does stuff okok look, I wrote this 2 months ago, I've read all the comments, I know you can't do that method because it just doesn't work out. I get it, thanks for the input though

@arcman79

6 жыл бұрын

You cut the 3 squares first then cut in half (6 parts) then again split to 12 divide by 4 then each gets 3 parts

Thanks Calc 2 for teaching me about converging Taylor series for help with that last one. Recognizing patters like that is probably the only application of that class I will ever use.

yeah without a measurement tool you can definitely cut the gold bar into those pieces identically

Hii I just discovered your channel and its awesome, keep up with those riddles. I realy enjoy them. :) And btw the first one, doesnt work, how is it possible to find the odd one if ervery one is odd? Or didnt I get this right?

@delta3244

7 жыл бұрын

with #1: -The normal was the most common occurrence (blue outline, square, red) -There was only one that was exactly like that -The others were all off by exactly 1 ∴ The ''normal'' one is the most odd in the group.

@arashnozarinejad9915

7 жыл бұрын

same here

Why so many dislikes? People are so short tempered.

7 жыл бұрын

Most of them are way to arbitrary, like saying: which number is unique: 2 , 3 ,4 ,5..... it is 4, because its the only number that can divide itself 2 times.

@brodewall5641

7 жыл бұрын

Also dislikes and likes don't matter they are all counted the same in the end.

The first one they are all different, and it's not a test of intelligence, it's a test of cleverness.

I can’t believe I only solved the “hardest” riddle

6 + 4 = 11

@jamesshiervlogs2613

7 жыл бұрын

King Sodium really

@emeronfoltz8026

7 жыл бұрын

are you trying to be funny or a dumbass plz reply with an answer

@au_bury

7 жыл бұрын

I was pointing out that it is possible to make it '6 + 4 = 11' It's obviously wrong lol :p

@emeronfoltz8026

7 жыл бұрын

good i thought you were stupid or something

@nine6269

6 жыл бұрын

King Sodium 6+4= 10

To riddle 3 is a much better solution. If you cut the whole thing horizontally and than both of the shapes in the middle you have a much easier way. Actually our solutions are both wrong when you count the bottom parts as havier cause the edges are beveled, but than there arent any solutions. Trust me im genius 🤗

@luisdebayle2239

6 жыл бұрын

Perfect Moments no ur not

@t3tris555

6 жыл бұрын

Luis Debayle than what is the answer

@luisdebayle2239

6 жыл бұрын

that doesnt have anything to do with you being a genius cuz ur not

@t3tris555

6 жыл бұрын

Luis Debayle how do you know 😊

@drewc9972

6 жыл бұрын

If you cut it horizontally, where the line touches the point at the lower middle, you get three pieces. If you did it vertically you’d get to sets of big and small trapezoids. Not so genius

For the second one, you can do it in 3 lines: 1 starting at the bottom going to the left and going to the left for about a hundred feet. Then, you go to the right all the way until you hit the circles, continue going another hundred or so, and go to the left again. If you line it up just right, you won't need the 4th.

@ponkumarans7549

3 жыл бұрын

Note : No point has area if u r not trying to be funny

@jooot_6850

3 жыл бұрын

@@ponkumarans7549 this is a 3 year old comment

For the third one , can’t you just cut it in the middle of the height then cut it in the middle at the top ???

Everyone is complaining about the first one but what about the last one? Since when does 6x2+g= 21?

@quentin8949

7 жыл бұрын

its 6x2 = 12 and 12+9 is 21. p.s Are you stupid?

@Fourfingerssixtoes

6 жыл бұрын

Quexniten he's obviously joking smartass

@tomrr5562

6 жыл бұрын

I could not agree with you more, g is not even like the 9th letter of the alphabet.

_Why are there so many dislikes? Its a good video and it has more dislikes than likes..._ *_I swear this system is overmanipulated_*

@SeanWallaWalla

7 жыл бұрын

Wait... some of them do not work correctly... but still... why?

@22slice

7 жыл бұрын

Sean Walla Walla for that exact reason

@stephenward2743

7 жыл бұрын

Do you understand what the dislike button is for? The guy used shit riddles which made no sense, as a result the viewer does not like the video and informs the creator by disliking the video. Otherwise in the future he will continue to post shitty riddles, by disliking the video it tells the creator that they should improve their content or people will not keep watching. Who gives a fuck if it hurts someones feelings, its for feedback...

Some could say that the first one is also unique as it's the only one with all trades. Lel

in "what shape is odd" every shape has something to name that shape "odd"

You can do #2 with only 3 lines, if they are shaped like a Z and they are long enough. Then, the sloped line in the middle of the Z would be so gradual, that it would practically be a straight line, or straight enough to cover all dots in the middle row

@1vader

7 жыл бұрын

Yeah, the way the points in the video are drawn this works. But usually in maths points don't have any area, so that wouldn't work.

@zacharyavitabile6724

7 жыл бұрын

Good point, I hadn't thought of that

@RedSunFX

7 жыл бұрын

Zachary Avitabile That​ only works if you don't treat the 3 dots in the middle as infinitesimal small points.

I got 1 easily, 4 took me a minute or so, and I got 5 in under 5 seconds pretty sure

I solved them all but the 2nd one.. jeez for the life of me I couldn't bring myself to go beyond the dots 🤣🤣

That last one was the easiest lmao

I got them all

@apexmike849

7 жыл бұрын

Bastard ;-)

@Soupy_loopy

7 жыл бұрын

Quinn Baker-Garters Wow!!! Good job! Your prize will be delivered to your mailbox.

3:10 You can also move the one at the plus sign, making it 8 - 4 = 4

@KloseEnkounter

7 жыл бұрын

deadass, thats the first solution

@emeronfoltz8026

7 жыл бұрын

they already said that

@thierryedwards599

7 жыл бұрын

ur so dumb seriously

@emeronfoltz8026

7 жыл бұрын

XD

@glitzyx4x852

6 жыл бұрын

his picture is better then yours

It looks like the outside edge of the gold bar is tapered so you can't cut it equally into 4 pieces

I got the so called "hardest one" instantly, so... yey

although the 3rd Solution in the 4th riddle was wrong (I mean a 9 doesn't look like this, there has to be a matchstick in the Bottom part) I quite enjoyed the Video!

@solomonmason835

7 жыл бұрын

Not necessarily. The most common way to write a 9, at least of what i have seen, is to write it without the small tail at the bottom.

@paulkennedy8701

7 жыл бұрын

Solomon is right. Both are used. Google images of 9-segment displays to see examples of both.

@fabianpecto3300

7 жыл бұрын

if u do the '6' with 6 matches, u should use 6 matches for the '9' as well.........

@paulkennedy8701

7 жыл бұрын

Actually it is not unknown for real-life 7-segment displays to make the 6 with 6 segments and the 9 with 5. (I googled images for "7-segment display 6 9" and the 7th one showed exatly that.) (This may be a style choice, but there is a practical advantage: the 2 characters are distinct even when viewed upside down.)

It's weird because when i saw the first riddle one year ago, i was able to answer it in 4 to 6 seconds, but now i am myself feeling it to be illogical

When I couldn't solve any of them, I just thought to myself... *IM REALLY STUPID*

It's funny, the hardest one is the one I had the easiest time figuring out.

2:37 just cut straight through the middle of the gold bar and then cut through the middle of the remaining gold bar chunks; it requires less cuts!

I would just cut the gold bar from the sides lol

The gold bar one is even more simple! Just turn it round, so the side is on the ground, then cut down

With the gold bar I was thinking to cut it in half so you have two of the original shape just with half the depth, then cut it down the middle

Well now I just feel like listening to more Beethoven ...

I got all of these except for the gold bar one, I divided into four triangles but I did have a feeling they wouldn't have been perfectly equal.

You could also have cut the gold bar into 4 layers which would also mean less cuts

wtf, failed 1, 2 and 3 and then "easily" succeded in 4 and 5 i guess brain is a funny organ