4. Chaplin, Part II (2007)

MIT 21L.011 The Film Experience, Fall 2013
View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/21L-011F13
Instructor: David Thorburn
Continue discussion of Charlie Chaplin, comparing his films to those of Buster Keaton. Examples: Keaton's Cops, Chaplin's The Gold Rush, City Lights, and particularly Modern Times.
00:00 OCW Intro
00:25 Keaton vs. Chaplin
21:16 Three passages: Cops, The Gold Rush, and City Lights
39:19 Modern Times
License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
More courses at ocw.mit.edu

Пікірлер: 30

  • @deathmakesmoresense5354
    @deathmakesmoresense5354 Жыл бұрын

    This is one of the coolest lecture in MIT openCoursewar.

  • @ivyli1370
    @ivyli13704 жыл бұрын

    Now that I think about it, the use of the clip of Chaplin skating in the Joker is just brilliant.

  • @dakaarys8424

    @dakaarys8424

    4 жыл бұрын

    Those who criticized the film to be a derivative work (borrowing heavily from Scorsese's King of Comedy and Taxi Driver) were clearly not educated (in films) to see that it's not just a homage to a couple of films, but a masterful twist (a metacommentary of sorts) on the age-old story of the tramp (critical of excesses created by capitalism), where the tramp loses his optimism, his resilience.

  • @weebgrinder

    @weebgrinder

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@dakaarys8424 True. A lot of negative criticism is the result of the critic not knowing the intent of the artist (director, etc...).

  • @7somekindofsomething
    @7somekindofsomething4 жыл бұрын

    thank you

  • @user-hs7qg5tt8t
    @user-hs7qg5tt8t3 жыл бұрын

    What a delightful surprise! So MIT is not completely a nerd school?! hahha mind-blowing. Thanks, I really enjoy this video from a link OCW update letter

  • @DominicKearns14
    @DominicKearns146 жыл бұрын

    28:37

  • @luisfelipevr1996

    @luisfelipevr1996

    6 жыл бұрын

    MACK SWAIINNNNN

  • @Reionder

    @Reionder

    6 жыл бұрын

    So subtle I almost noticed it

  • @andymassingham

    @andymassingham

    4 жыл бұрын

    Dominic Kearns Woah!

  • @nazaren45
    @nazaren45 Жыл бұрын

    Top 👍👍

  • @trfyhrghty4222
    @trfyhrghty4222 Жыл бұрын

    👍

  • @Wired4Life2
    @Wired4Life23 жыл бұрын

    Disagree on the use of intertitles at the end of _City Lights._ They provide a necessary finality to the scene.

  • @riynu7774

    @riynu7774

    2 ай бұрын

    "They provide a necessary finality to the scene." what finality? how were they necessary? just vague bs cuz nothing can be bad about something one likes....

  • @nanwilder2853
    @nanwilder28533 жыл бұрын

    By the 3rd or 4th time he says “imaginativeness”, instead of imagination, I want to scream: “Quit putting ness on the ends of words”! (Ambitiousness, for ambition, among others).

  • @davidiancrux
    @davidiancrux4 жыл бұрын

    It’s frustrating that he says everything is a critique of “capitalism”. It is as if the words “greed”, or “excess”, or “destructive industrialism” don’t have any part to play in his mind.

  • @ThisFrenchEditor

    @ThisFrenchEditor

    4 жыл бұрын

    Maybe it's because you don't realize that capitalism actualy rewards those kind of behaviours.

  • @to-ur1ri

    @to-ur1ri

    4 жыл бұрын

    he was also doing this at mit in 2007, where you can devise your own course materials and stuff but not only do universities and colleges completely entirely rely and depend on capitalism, but if some instructor at a big time university or college was openly criticising capitalism as one of the worlds greatest evils, i would be surprised if that instructor held their position.

  • @davidiancrux

    @davidiancrux

    4 жыл бұрын

    okisikow you shouldn’t be surprised because they’re literally doing it all the time to a degree which harms the actual subject they’re supposed to be teaching. Further, capitalism is not an evil. Karl Marx was wrong. We can critique capitalism and how it’s used without accepting his garbage, verifiably incorrect perspective.

  • @davidiancrux

    @davidiancrux

    4 жыл бұрын

    RedImpakt It may reward those kinds of behaviors, but it is not itself those things. Capitalism unrestrained by law is garbage, but capitalism under a functional, sensible, and moral governing body is the most effective tool for eliminating poverty.

  • @ThisFrenchEditor

    @ThisFrenchEditor

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@davidiancrux and how can you possibly enforce a "functional, sensible and moral governing body" in capitalism other than with Laws and regulations, have you ever heard of John Maynard Keynes? How many crisis will happen before you realized that unrestricted capitalism is highly unstable and cause crisis which leads to massive damage to the economy on the expenses of working people. Faith in people who disregard you as "consumers" is the lowest level of self esteem.

  • @samhallzero
    @samhallzero2 жыл бұрын

    Not bad, but when he enters in gender politics, he becomes a joke. Doors weren't opened for women because they weren't strong enough but to show chivalric protection by the man to her and eventually to the family they may have.

  • @tidde7728

    @tidde7728

    11 ай бұрын

    why should men ‘protect’ those women? It directly implies that they are not strong enough, and that men are