If you are a fan of muscle cars, please comment number 1. Muscle car lovers will meet here.

@390rambler

Ай бұрын

Do your programmers watch the video before uploading? What a Pontiac Two Plow Two? Funny how the bot voice keeps changing. At least it got Plymouth right. GET A HUMAN NARRATOR.

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

@@390rambler Thank you for responding. I'm trying to find the most suitable voice.

@390rambler

Ай бұрын

@@qmusclecars I would enjoy these videos if the script was written in American English and you had a human narrator. And please drop the " Muscle Car" from the title. I'm sure the programmers can come up with a better title. Please have humans review the video before posting.

@ig55

Ай бұрын

I'm a fan of muscle cars but definitely not a fan of bot narration. In fact, it makes me sick...

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

@@ig55 sorry for that.

The 64, 440, had a 413 cubic inch engine!

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

Yes, thank you so much.

Why are the cars being shown resto mods and in some pictures not even the same car

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

Thank you. Which car do you like the most?

@matrox

Ай бұрын

Another YT Fake News video.

Thanks for sharing

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!

bro please look for plymouth belvedere 1958 christine

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

Yes, thank you very much.

07:55 Its a 65 Pontiac 2 Plow 2!

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

Sorry

1, definitely a muscle car fan and can't wait for more videos.

@lbj7739

Ай бұрын

You have to be a bot too. No human would give a answer like that to this AI generated crap

@claytonthomas1980

Ай бұрын

@@lbj7739 I am human just as you are and no offense plus no disrespect for saying this but if you believe that the channel is A.I generated then there is no need for you to respond to my opinion on that channel for any reason whatsoever and for you no need to watch it down the line in the long run.

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

Thank you for always supporting my channel and watching great videos. I'm so happy to have such wonderful audiences like you.

@markyac

Ай бұрын

I don't believe you and Q even know the definition of muscle car.

08:25 $400 and 18 54 Dars! What language is he speaking?

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

I'm sorry for that. I will change my narrator.

I like muscle cars

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

Great. Thank you.

Its not hard to show the correct cars u are talking about, showing modified and incorrect years and models.. very poor research. I bothers me because younger generations are getting the wrong information. please do a little better with your research.

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

Thank you very much. I really need criticism to make me better every day. I will study the script more carefully for the next videos.

7:10 Stop effing lying! FAKE NEWS. This car DID NOT come with a 4 speed Auto trans. !!!

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

Thank you very much. I really need criticism to make me better every day. I will study the script more carefully for the next videos.

The Chrysler wasn't a "C-300" in 1955. It was just "300". Later models added a letter suffix to the model name, to designate the body style changes. C-300 is only a very recent re-naming of the model. The image @7:07 is NOT a '64 Mercury Comet. Nor is the car @7:23 or @7:50. A '63 Studebaker Lark was hardly a "muscle car". A '70 Monte Carlo was not a sports car. It was personal luxury. And the robovoice is a joke. Plenty of other obvious errors in this video. I agree with OP in another thread below, I give this video a thumbs-down. I'm sure not subscribing based on this poor example of video.

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

Thank you. Can you rate the quality of video content for me? How do I improve my video to make it more engaging and valuable? I am very grateful for your comments.

@rayrussell6258

Ай бұрын

@@qmusclecars I rated it thumbs-down, don't know how I can be more specific than the other errors I already pointed out. Your facts were wrong, you had obvious robovoice issues, and you didn't seem to understand the difference between production cars and heavily aftermarket modified cars. A humble Chevy Vega can be converted into a muscle car if you spend enough money on it, but that doesn't make the Vega a muscle car.

This dude can't talk!

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

Thanks for watching.

Unimpressed by the heavily modified examples you present here cpmpounded by inclusion of incorrect models and even the wrong year model. Shitty robovoice. Voted down..

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

I'm sorry for that. I will look for a professional reader.

@rayrussell6258

Ай бұрын

@@qmusclecars The Chrysler wasn't a "C-300" in 1955. It was just "300". Later models added a letter suffix to the model name, to designate the body style changes. The image @7:07 is NOT a '64 Mercury Comet. Nor is the car @7:23 or @7:50. A '63 Studebaker Lark was hardly a "muscle car". A '70 Monte Carlo was not a sports car. It was personal luxury. And the robovoice is a joke. I agree with OP, I give this video a thumbs-down. I'm sure not subscribing based on this poor example of video.

Skippy: Why don't you study English and American cars and then narrate the videos yourself? You are an insult to real YT content producers.

@qmusclecars

Ай бұрын

Can you explain more clearly?

@markyac

Ай бұрын

@@qmusclecars I can't imagine being any clearer. Is English even your first language?