FINALLY...Getting back to useful science based videos. Graphene is how I found the channel years ago.

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

lol - cheers

@justinw1765

3 жыл бұрын

It's not so black and white. Most of the videos are science related and potentially useful. Learning how to convert or apply different things to other things, or learning how things work, can all be helpful when you start to approach creating things in a "systems" approach rather than a linear logical and narrow kind of way. Part of creativity is applying holistic thinking and perception. With that said, I also found and really liked the channel because of the graphene and other battery stuff, and it's nice to see some more focus on that again. But it doesn't mean all these other videos were a waste of time or pointless.

@21degrees

3 жыл бұрын

I disagree. I think only about half of the newer ones are good - and the other half are (insert word here). I hope the channel can emphasize quality over quantity.

@justinw1765

3 жыл бұрын

@@21degrees Most of the info is free to us. We the viewers should be grateful and appreciative that so much information is being shared that is free. If you're going to complain, at least become a paying member first.

@21degrees

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you justin. I am an Engineer that lives across the pond...I watch for entertainment purposes and I make very few comments but only to help the channel move in a good direction. I am also quite old and I am designing an electric vehicle (not a car) and video 1070 hit a nerve because the advice was so bad. I wish you guys the best of luck. With respect always.

Hi Rob. I use Concentrated Sulphuric acid and Nitric acid/Microwave method and various methods to separate the leaves afterwards, per your vid a couple of years ago. I works supremely well every time, and, it is safe, ie: no explosion risk. To make small graphene from large flake graphite I run it through a modified meat grinder with a HDPE disk with lots of .1 mm holes in it, or the marble and glycerine route. The marble method is best. Very high quality graphene.

@gregshafransky1907

3 жыл бұрын

marble glycerine method? do you have a link?

Glad you redid this one, I remember those original videos in your back garden! This is much better and explained really well.

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

cheers mate

Love your practical approach!

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

Gotta say, watching your videos are both educational and fun.

He sure has done a lot of graphene research. Packed a ton of quality references in this video just by gabbing on. This one is a keeper.

This is super bloody exciting stuff thanks mate. The possibilities and uses for this are incredibly important for the future. I've watched all of your old videos on this and so glad you are revisiting this.

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

cheers mate - the old one are a bit ropey and difficult to follow as they have no real structure

Genius! I love the # of videos! You guys are on it! Hacks the youtube algorithm by posting a video every day. KZread pays attention to how many people watch until the very end, and comment. Cheers.

Yeah . That is a great presentation Rob. Good Format..... Keep doing that.

this kinda looks like the first remade video, you talked about in the "changes to the channel" video, by the way a similar video about carbon nanotubes would be super nice

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

it is exactly that mate - well spotted

@justinw1765

3 жыл бұрын

Last I heard, MIT was giving out their process of creating carbon nanotubes, if you requested. In fact, I think this is how the artist Stuart Semple was able to create his blackest black or whatever it's called, paint, using carbon nanotubes created from that process, as a base (and put in an acrylic medium).

Ur a genius soldier !!!👍. Can’t thank u enough!!! A year after watching ur video I was successful in duplicating . I laughed hysterically when I saw carbon foam boiling in th epson salt doped water when I connected a 100watt harbor freight thunderbolt (4solar panels) to a piece of #6 rebar +,th negative was connected to a #2 pencil stripped on both ends tytyty team Success th mission is complete Long time fan future share holder- “ I ain’t never had nun’s ( cept a goldmine)😍

Amazing, great idea to put all the graphene methods together!

@halifakx

2 жыл бұрын

if id knew enough about chemistry, id like to see if there is a compound, made of several atoms packed in a way that at room temperature fit loosely in between the graphene layers of the graphite. That "ideal compound" would stay flat or ball shaped at a certain temperature, but gets more 3d (expanded in the 3 x y z directions) when heated or excited, or perhaps placed under a magnetic field, helping to push part the layers of graphene and helping to provide the energy to break the pi bonds...... if it doesnt work....my b plan would be break the layers carbon sp2 bonds by resonating the "ideal compound" at the "self resonating" frequency (which of course shold be known in advance), until the compound goes wild going up and down helping to separate the sheets....

Apparently, I have been living under a rock for a while 😆 . I saw some video titles here that had graphene in them, but since I didn't have a huge interest in building batteries, I never watched them. Something new to watch 👍.

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

lol - well it is the wonder material on everyone's mind

Thanks again as always Lord. 😁

Always informative and applicable

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

cheers mate

@wallyworld817

3 жыл бұрын

@@ThinkingandTinkering cheers 🍻👍

Awesome, thanks!

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

cheers mate

Nothing screams "Robert-Murray Smith-video" like good ol graphene

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

lol

@bikerfirefarter7280

3 жыл бұрын

FWG = Faffing With Graphene.

Thank you! I am a retired chemist and wasn’t sure how the individual layered graphite was produced.

Excellent! A comprehensive summary of graphene production methods. Great idea! Just a niggling little point: it would be most helpful to spell out in the description the names of the referenced investigators (or products, etc.). I have had problems in the past trying to suss out the correct spelling to find the original references. (Is it "Hummus" or "Hommous" or what? "Tour" or "Toor" or "Toire" or "Teuor" or ?) English is not all that phonetic, after all, and names, not very much either. :-) Many thanks for your work, Rob!

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

that is a good point mate - some things just don't occur to me and I think you are spot on here - it's hummer's and tour - not for you but for others reading this post mate - cheers

@edwardcdg

3 жыл бұрын

@@ThinkingandTinkering Thanks, Rob! Much appreciated.

love video great job

Nice work on the vlog guys, I just like watching you guys. Have a great day guys or sleep. Not you Rob no sleep for the wicked mate. Lol

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

lol - fair enough mate lol

Well, sulphuric acid cost me one or the other lab coat in my chemistry times, back in the nineties... 🧪🥼 Today working with computers in an office (since last year even @home) is *much* healthier, on more than one level. 😊 Nevertheless, sometimes I do miss the olden times... And graphene is so fascinating, so versatile. This channel gave me so many ideas for home usage. 😄👍

this topic has the maximum of my attention...also would be interesting to learn to make carbon fiber...that would make some manufacturers not happy - they charge a lot for carbon fiber, not sure if the price is really justified. I would definitely join again

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

carbon fibre is just burnt PANi mate

Good job

Seeing what you do a strong though comes in my mind: let the chemists do the chemical work. If I do what you just did surely something will blow into my face fastest that I could realize. You're a chemist and you know how to play this game. We, the non-chemists enjoy your presentation. Regardez mais pas touchez as a Frenchman will say. Cheers mate!

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

yeah - it does take practice that's for sure

@justinw1765

3 жыл бұрын

Sulfuric acid is not nearly as dangerous as often portrayed. There was a period where I was working with it a fair amount, and for awhile, I didn't realize that my butyl rubber gloves had tiny pin holes that where allowing acid to get through. I was using my hands to swish around cellulose in acid. Anyways, even after a few days of this, no real damage was done. Just irritated and dried out my skin a bit. Definitely wear goggles though.

Cant find your video on electrochemical exfoliation graphite on graphene, did you remove it?

If there's any series of videos that I've watched on your channel that was in need of a camera quality update, the Graphene production vids would bubble expediently to the top!

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

lol - yeah I thought that lol

I tried going to your website to buy your ink and it wasnt there no more so now i gotta make it

Would a sonic bath be a reasonable substitution for the stirring during intercalation? How would that affect particulate sizes would you suppose?

@danp1224

3 жыл бұрын

I think the sonic bath will make it hot and boom. Maybe sonic bath after expanding.

@ryanlebeck259

3 жыл бұрын

@@danp1224 I was thinking the sonic application while it is in an ice bath. Robert mentioned a sonic stirrer, and I think that was more what I had in mind I suppose.

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

sonication will heat it up mate - not good

@ryanlebeck259

3 жыл бұрын

@@ThinkingandTinkering appreciate the clarification. Thanks a bundle!

I know this is an older video but what if you combine this and your microwave method? Could it exfoliate it further to make yet again smaller partials

Thank you for your content. I have scoured the internet to find the simplest method of converting 300 mesh graphite into single or double layer graphene. I am clearly not a chemist and taking very small steps with a "safety first" approach. Most chemicals and items like a Kiln are simply not available in a small isolated country. Will either Potassium Nitrate or Sodium Hydroxide work as a substitute for Potassium Permanganate? I would consider the electrical separation method however purchasing a welding machine is not my first approach and appears to be a slower method. A total of 10-15 lbs of graphite will need to be converted. All suggestion are welcome.

any useful tests for varifying results of your labwork?

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

ramen, XRD, SEM and TEM are basic characterisation mate

@edkoetsier339

3 жыл бұрын

Build an electron microscope or pay a lab a lot...

Hey Robert Murray Smith. Thank you so much for showing us these things. In school the teachers were nothing but confusing. They refuse to answer questions. They refused to demonstrate what they were talking about. Also the school textbooks were confusing and incomplete. Government-controlled, government paid for substandard; so-called education in the United States. In the United States as a first world country we are ranked 39th in education. That means 38 other countries have a better educational system than we do as first World countries. I wonder if we're in last place. With your videos I realized I am capable of comprehending and understanding something, if I rewind it enough times and think about what you said, and listen to it again. Eventually I get everything you're talking about if I listen to it enough times rewind it enough times and think about it enough times. The public school system in the United States is abomination.

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

I am glad you find it useful and interesting mate - cheers

You can get sodium nitrate still, It is the easily bought online. Ammonium nitrate is what can no longer be bought without a license.

PLEASE MAKE A VIDEO ON EMF RF SHIELDING PAINT WITH THE RIGHT FORMULA. PAINT IS VERY EXPENSIVE IN STORES. THANKS A LOT. WATCHING IN CANADA

Ah Graphene some thing i had not heard of till about 5 years ago. it might of been one of your videos that showed how to make it with sticky tape.

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

probably lol - I will be covering mechanical methods in another vid mate

WOW, You make me feel like a Gibbon climbing up the curtains!

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

lol - I have been doing this for quite a few years mate lol

Golden graphite. Sounds like the gem. Would be nothin to keep in a bath and still make use of.

Hey Robert, before I make my own, would love to know what you charge for let's say 10 kilograms of graphene? For cement and perhaps other projects. :).

Thanks for the overview's and posting this plus all your previous talks Dr Rob. I disliked most of my science teachers but you I'd rather hear because you occasionally laugh which sets me off too. As a lime plasterer I'm wondering why's it good in concrete, what's it do, would it keep damp at bay if a current passed through it for instance?

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

it was the Romans who discovered the addition of carbon strengthened cement mate but the use of volcanic ash - graphene just updates that really

@petergambier

3 жыл бұрын

@@ThinkingandTinkering, thanks for the reply Robert, the Romans weren't to know that immersing the lime in seawater would produce Phillipsite in the lime mortar which are plate like objects that bend rather than shatter when the mortars put under stress. But you still didn't say what the graphene did in it.

Thanks mate! We can only get battery acid solution which is only approx 65-70% S acid, will it still work ?

@undernetjack

Жыл бұрын

You can concentrate and purify that rather easily.

Chemistry 101 Love it! DVD:)

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

awesome lol

Hi...how big a wimshurst ufo , should i make to leave earth? It has to withstand minus 300.

If I remember correctly, making a one atom thick sheet of graphene you need cvd. Was wondering if there is a way to make a way to makeake that oven on your own?

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

that's one way mate - cvd is a bottom-up approach - and yes you can do it

@marz.6102

3 жыл бұрын

@@ThinkingandTinkering thx

Dear Sir, are graphene or graphene oxide toxic to humans in any form?

Was R.Hummer expecting to dissolve the graphite into a chemical solution..,what might happen if mixed with lime and salt, will it dissociate into a warmed glass matrix.., is there such a thing as hot chemistry (where the fluids are hot).. should the NaOH be warm? (“..in some ways, this is the reverse process, of what happens inside the bovine digestive tract, using heat and pressure to form planar surfaces”)

@undernetjack

Жыл бұрын

What now?

dear robert Could you substitute the manganate for 30% hydrogen peroxide? - What if I only use sulfuric acid and nitric acid? -And if I only use solfuric acid and then exfoliate it in the microwave? -And if I only use 30% hydrogen peroxide, with graphite powder? I observe that it exfoliates, but I don't know if the result is graphene or graphene oxide, could you clarify it for me Thank you

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

the job of the H2O2 isn't as an oxidiser mate - it is the make the 'left over' manganese dioxide form soluble sulphates so they can be washed out in the purification step

Is this true? 'Photoluminescence of Graphene Oxide' can you do an experiment on this? thanks

Why did you take apart your magnusson junior hacksaw and then put it back together

I got Sodium, potassium, and ammonium nitrate off amazon. 🎩🦄💛

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

it very much depends on which country you live in mate

@Mikey42287

3 жыл бұрын

I guess the world 🌎😌 just ain't what it should be. Uniform. Equal.

@Mikey42287

3 жыл бұрын

Have a good day bud.

3:16 basically run away lol

"We leave that for a million years or so" hahahaha

What is the brown powder? Potassium Permanganate is deep purple.

@yotuhbhumi-movements

Жыл бұрын

Yes same question

You got that much from just half a gramm ? That is a massive volume increase !

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

if done well the exfoliate rate is astounding - incidentally this is what Petrik did - more or less

I still will be interested to see you make a paint on solar panel...

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

for sure

@justinw1765

3 жыл бұрын

Hey, just curious, were you at B.P.L. at some point?

@Justin-ng4zg

3 жыл бұрын

@@justinw1765 What is that?

@justinw1765

3 жыл бұрын

@@Justin-ng4zg It's an abbreviation of the name of the forum I was on. I asked, because there used to be a Justin Baker on there. We occasionally talked via pm system.

Im a bit old fashond i have only reasontly come to smart phone tech

Is there any real advantage to using sodium nitrate I think that's what you said sodium nitrate is an oxidizer? I only say that because it's so easy to make with any kind of chloride salt and electrochemical reaction I mean it takes a few days but it's really easy to make why am I telling you this I know you know this already I was just wondering if there's an advantage to a nitrate salt ?

I confess my ignorance, maybe this is how they already do it. Still, I actually looked up "how do you make nanobots" and came across a site describing a shrinking method. Yep, the molecules have the same density, but they shrink the size in some medium. So, I already knew about hydrogels and 4D printing; you can make a flat 'print' that rolls up like a carpet. I just put two and two together and thought why not make the 4D carpet with a layer of graphene contained within. Then roll it up and shrink it? Voila, carbon nanotube. Seems feasible enough. How do they make those things anyway?

@Donatellangelo

3 жыл бұрын

Err, yeah...this post was about carbon nanotubes. But, since that's an application of graphene, I thought it was kinda relevant. ;)

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

you can make CNTs with a candle

5:38 are you sure about the room temp?

How do you write the names of those two guys?

@edwardcdg

3 жыл бұрын

Oops. Good question. Same here.

@scotttovey

3 жыл бұрын

It turns out to be Holm's and Tour. Apparrently, Watson was not interested in graphene production.

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

Hummer's, Tour

@ichbinderroboter

3 жыл бұрын

@@ThinkingandTinkering Thank you!

I never understood why the resulting graphite is still multilayers, i.e. why doesn't the graphite intercalate fully? The reaction seems fast enough and the reagents are in excess.

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

because it is a real system with lots of variables we can't control mate - something always goes 'wrong' with real systems

How much Graphene can one make with 100 Million Metric tons of Graphite? ;) I have the Graphite, I need to check on the Acid. I have lots of potassium permanganate. Thanks for getting back to the Graphene. :)

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

quite a lot I would imagine lol

@justinw1765

3 жыл бұрын

Keep in mind there are varying qualities of graphene, that you can over simplify into low, medium, and high quality categories. Most of these methods make low to medium which can be decent to good for things like batteries, super caps, increasing strengths of epoxy, concrete, etc. However, the holy grail of graphene research is producing the high quality stuff, the true 1 atom thick flat sheets that are super conductive, ridiculously strong for weight and volume, etc. It's been awhile since I've looked into graphene research, but last I checked, only a couple methods could reliably produce the high quality stuff, but they are not easy for most DIY'ers. One of them is using electrical or plasmic catalytic processes on things like oil, carbon dioxide, deposited on copper sheet. The easiest way to tell that you have the high quality, true 1 layer graphene, is that it is completely transparent to the naked eye. If it's black, it's multiple layers, somewhat jumbled and/or stacked which affects electrical and structural properties adversely. Personally, I became more interested in the hemp fiber conversion stuff, but from there, I started wondering about using pure CNC's (cellulose nanocrystals), and converting these into graphite, or rather a graphitzed form. Because if you isolate, and concentrate the crystalline structure of the material, it stands to reason that you'll likely get better electrical and structural properties. Also not on part with true, high quality graphene, but often better than the low to mid grade kind of in between graphite and graphene stuff. I also moved away from hemp, because in my country (US) hemp, even "waste" hemp is not cheap or easy to get for the most part. I realized that any bast fiber with a high percentage of crystalline cellulose would work similarly, and even better if you isolate and concentrate what's there. So I did some research and figured out the cheapest material to source, and did some research and experimentation on how to do that. It's kind of a pain, because it's a multi step process, not even including the pre process of cleaning these well for chemical conversions. But first you have to bleach/get rid of the lignin, which neither the sulfuric acid nor enzymes do, then with the acid or enyzmes, you get rid of the soft/regular cellulose's at proper temps and ratios of acid to water and also proper time. This is not including all the rinsing in between the different reactions. If done right, this leaves you with a high purity/higher percentage of the crystalline cellulose. Then you have to carbonize it in low oxygen environment. And with a good and well insulated microwave kiln, you can graphitize it in a low oxygen environment. This is all ok if you're make small batteries or super caps for yourself, but forget about selling to the masses. And who knows what regulations and rules of testing etc have to be done before selling actual batteries to people? Now, mixing some of this in, with some of the low to mid grade graphite-graphene hybrids is a little more economical and faster since it's a bit easier and faster to produce the latter than the former. And then further mix a bit of high quality, but regular graphite to further increase those factors. But then you have to worry about other various things like optimal electrolytes and proper systems, which are all whole other can of worms in and of themselves. And, if the new vacuum capacitors are a real thing/tech, it will make ALL of this stuff completely obsolete. If the claims are true or even half true, there is nothing currently or even in lab that is anywhere close to the energy density and power density of these vacuum capacitors that allegedly attract and store super cluster electrons, and apparently are pretty cheap and easy to build because there is no exotic materials or processes. Super clustered electrons are a bit of a controversial topic. But apparently, ball lighting is considered by some, to be a natural form of this phenomenon. Ken Shoulders, one of the researchers who stumbled on to these exotic state/form of electrons was first told by Feynman these were not possible, but later on, after other research/researchers indicated they were, he wrote an apology letter to Shoulders saying that he was wrong and that it is possible. So, I'm hoping and praying that the company who patented and is working on these, actually is successful in getting to market because it is a game changer to everything electric. Oh, and these can be used to generate electricity as well, by super heating a filament inside of them. Graphene et al will still be useful for structural purposes, but electrical storage will be less of an important focus.

Oh wonder, you're still alive! Have one cup of coffee for your health Rob!

Hummus method? Tour method? I'm sorry, I can't tell if that's what you're saying or not, clarify?

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

hummer's, tour method

Umm did you explain the reason for making graphine?

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

well sort of - I did mention it improved batteries, plastics and concrete

@lightcapmath2777

3 жыл бұрын

@@ThinkingandTinkering Thanks :)

Hey Robert, Did you know Elon Musk has a 50 million dollar prize offer for a practical carbon capture method? Seems perfect for your knowledge, skills and chemistry acumen. My finder fee is only 5% if you win. A trival one at these sums.

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

I did know mate and well worth the 5% lol

Everything is popcorn if you want it to be lol.

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

for sure lol

The space inbetween becomes less negative 😍 interpolation? Dus this means schinking of the particles bi tacing less negative space in👁👁??¿ the same event😍??¿😍

@arnokosterman231

Жыл бұрын

Wauw😍😍😍 lower thention bit introduce more ratio😍😍😍 For the princeple particles to scrink in to Oooooh💜 When it has match diverentional to cool down again it has a lot of ruling magnetudee of space and motion within the space inbetween oll😍 in high thentional surrounding 😍 Yeah supercondurctive😍😍😍 Question is the supperconducivety in boths directions?🙏🙏🙏

@arnokosterman231

Жыл бұрын

Space gallery of inbetween the grafite Oei but u like magnus 😍💜😍 The way you interact with the knowledge you are sharing 😍 is directly connected with cosmic understanding😍 Oy🎁 🙏

@arnokosterman231

Жыл бұрын

Pleace look to mi sharings last 4 months. 🙏 how you see wat you explain I see in thentional diverentional of the space itself with cosmic behaviures 💜 You see them tace and desolves a litle more in to to be pulled open to exited to become that new begaviures😍 The way I see lightstructure behaves exactly the same as this evend. Oxigen levels soil populations water behaviure our phisicle existances and so on and so on and so on in the same way😍 But from the senery behind the existence of phisicle existance and behaviures💜 I think you're it😍🙏😍🎁 Sharings youtube videos last 3 our 4 months😍

isn't graphene a carcinogen?

7:29 "do-do"

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

lol

All this talk about hummus makes me hungry. And blowing up hummers is quite expensive.

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

it does get chick peas everywhere lol

9 seconds

@wallyworld817

3 жыл бұрын

First like

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

awesome!

Look at the graphene structure, 6 points, 6 lines, and many of these sixes. That's the mark of the beast 666. Also what can cause pain (Revelation 16:10) and “a noisome and grievous sore” (Revelation 16:2)? Only something medicinal can cause these. Not a chip implant. Also human body is 18% carbon. So therefore "a man's number" is also 666. (Revelation 13:18）“The sun shall be turned into darkness, And the moon into blood, Before that great and notable Day of the Lord come: And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.” --Acts‬ ‭2:20-21‬

Don't sound as easy as bakeng cookies.

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

ah baking cookies well Isn't that easy mate

:D

@ThinkingandTinkering

3 жыл бұрын

cheers