Couldnt disagree more about the Big Short. They did a really good job of explaining it in detail, then summarizing in layman's terms

@MichaelWerneburg

5 ай бұрын

Right. It was the whole point of the movie.

@sea_triscuit7980

5 ай бұрын

​@@MichaelWerneburgthink of the average joe watching and remember how stupid more than half of America is.

@iDewThis4Yu

5 ай бұрын

Right? Like they legit took time to explain it in the simplest way😂

@PoliteWerewolf

5 ай бұрын

Yeah. I'm no financial expert, but I got the gist of it.

@pickyourpopculturepoison

5 ай бұрын

The Big Short literally dumbs it down intentionally. At some point, there’s nothing they can do.

Tenet does makes sense. People just remembered as being about reversing time when it was about reversing entropy.

Can't blame the Big Short for nonetheless confusing audiences even while trying to break it down in multiple ways. Afterall, these are the same audiences that have kept a Fast + Furious franchise alive for decades, and can't tell the difference between two different German soldiers.

@robswystun2766

5 ай бұрын

To be fair, all white people look the same.

@iDewThis4Yu

5 ай бұрын

Yeah ikr😂. Dude just kinda admitted he’s kinda slow by putting that on the list. Crazy that people will the big short confusing but know all the rules and ups and downs of the Star Wars universe 😂. Smh

The German soldier Miller let go was the same one that shot him and Upham killed. The German soldier that stabbed Mellish was a different soldier. The one that was shot by Upham even recognized him. What's confusing about that?

@blytheguy7510

5 ай бұрын

@@Giambijuice they really don't.

@tracisr

5 ай бұрын

A lot of people think they are the same soldier from the reaction videos I've watched

@tomarnold7284

5 ай бұрын

As an Asian, they looked the same to me😅

@blytheguy7510

5 ай бұрын

@@tracisr and unfortunately a lot of people are dumb.

@blytheguy7510

5 ай бұрын

@@tomarnold7284 they don't look Asian to me. Lol

I think what's more confusing about Pirates of the Caribbean is that there's no piracy in the films. Or that they have to go to Singapore to get a ship. Well, how'd they get to Singapore in the first place? It's not exactly next door and there must be far closer places to find a ship.

@Jakobman76

2 күн бұрын

They also had to get Sha Fangs map, and get him to go to the Pirates Court.

Banner explains in Endgame that returning the stones after the fact would erase the branch in the timeline. Steve was not in a parallel reality.

In "Jurassic Park" the novel, the T-rex tossed the Jeep up into a tree. That turned out to be literally impossible, given the weight of a Jeep compared to a T-rex. So Spielberg and the writers came up with a different scenario. But yes, the sudden appearance of the cliff is odd. I assumed it had to be on the other side of the road. But I just don't know.

@pandanarkystudios5198

5 ай бұрын

Im in the camp of some details don't need such explanation. If the movies doing its job (which JP does well) then you're not going to even notice/care on your first viewing. I didn't even notice but if I had I would've come up with my own solution like you, such as assuming it's the other side of the road

I always assumed Steve kept Stark's handheld time travel device and used it to get back to the 616 universe after the Penny(alternate) he spent his life with died.

@gregbasore2108

5 ай бұрын

Yup. He'd have had at least one batch of Pym Particles left over and would at the very least have wanted to make sure the team knew he was okay.

I read that in an interview, Lewis Carrol said the answer to “How is a raven like. writing desk?” was “neither is a bicycle”.

Why is a raven like a writing desk? Because one has quills of ink and the other has inky quills. (A throwback to when feathers (quills) were used to hold ink and write.)

@cazia9

5 ай бұрын

I’ve also heard it explained as ‘Because (Edgar Allen) Poe wrote on both’

@MrProy33

4 ай бұрын

Except you didn't answer the riddle. You answered a different riddle, namely, "What's the difference between...?" How they are alike would be through shared qualities, in the way Lewis Carroll answered, and not through divergent qualities--even if the wordplay is similar. Your answer works if you say, "Because they both have inky quills."

Poe wrote on a writing desk. Poe wrote on (meaning on the subject of) a raven. Wasn't that also proposed as a valid answer to LC's riddle?

@sadie9728

5 ай бұрын

"Poe wrote on both" is the best answer.

@reh3884

4 ай бұрын

There have been many answers given to this, such as "they both have inky quills." The joke people don't seen to get is there is NO answer.

@sadie9728

4 ай бұрын

@@reh3884 apparently there are several

What made Endgame's conclusion even more confusing is that even the staff we're divided on whether or not Steve created a new timeline or if he was always there. Thank God we got a definitive answer with Loki and that it was a closed loop paradox that the TVA allowed.

i could get behind Letty coming back because of amnesia, even Owen surviving and landing in a coma (but not how quickly he managed to recover from it), but they lost me with Han coming back through some lazy hologram retcon they never even bothered to explain properly, nevermind Gisele somehow returning. there's just no stakes in the franchise. wouldn't surprise me if they showed that Diogo somehow managed to survive his car wreck in Fast X

@tylerleitzke

5 ай бұрын

I agree they don't do a good job of explaining the story and unfortunately they aren't released in chronological order and skip around a bit. Chronologically, Tokyo Drift takes place after other later Fast & Furious movies. At the end of Fast 5 when Han and Gisele are in the Lexus LFA they talk about going to Tokyo and Han says they'll get there eventually. After Han "dies" in Tokyo drift, Gisele goes to Mexico for Fast & Furious (fourth movie). Then it's revealed later Han learned how to escape but we went through several movies by then and the order makes it confusing.

@michaelstead7863

5 ай бұрын

Gisele’s return makes sense in a world that Idris Elba was rebuilt. My guess is so was Gisele.

@bjbresulla

5 ай бұрын

If Owen could survive flying out a windshield and falling out the plane when why couldn't Gisele also. They both generally fell at the same height in the same fashion. Gisele more likely would have the opportunity to at least tuck and roll and get some form of protection from he impact.

I always thought the answer was: "Because Edgar Allen Poe wrote on both."

"Because it can produce a few notes, tho they are very flat; and it is never put with the wrong end in front!" Except Carroll allegedly wrote " it is NEVAR put with the wrong end in front!" but it was incorrectly edited as an error before publication.

The easiest explanation to Endgame is that the MCU as we see it isn't the 1st go round for the time line. The movies we're watching is a variant timeline. Steve is the secret husband of Peggy. He went back in time, married Peggy, got old and gave the shield to Sam. All the while, the current Steve sees his picture on Peggy's desk (yeah, a married woman would have a long dead lover's pic on her desk while being married to another man) and goes back in time to marry Peggy.

A raven is like a writing desk "because Poe wrote on both". I thought everyone knew this?

@jamesfedheld1051

5 ай бұрын

Thats what i was taught growing up

@robbiescheid4127

5 ай бұрын

Thank you for telling me that I was always wondering how the rest of that goes

While watching The Big Shorr, I understood their explanations, they did a great job at explainig things

Steve Rogers didn't create a new timeline because he realized that the husband Peggy spoke about (in an old film clip that Steve sees at his Smithsonian exhibit) is actually him. He must've gone through records and seen something that made him go, "Whoa -- I'M the husband!" My personal theory is that he'd told Peggy what had happened after he'd gone back and said, "Okay, we have to hide the fact that I'm actually here and that I'm gonna marry you." So they set him up with a new identity and he stays in the background while she rises through the ranks and becomes the big head honcho over at SHIELD. But he and Peggy maybe hid a message somewhere, knowing that 2023 Steve wouldn't become aware of the fact that he was the husband until that moment. Went-to-the-past Steve could go, "Okay, on this day in 2023, I found a message that told me to come here." Then they write said message and hide it where he found it, along with whatever clues led him there. Basically, they know when and where to leave the message because 2023 Steve found it in the 21st century...and then went back and told Peggy where to leave the message so 2023 Steve could find it. Closed-loop time travel paradoxes. It'll hurt your brain.

A raven is like a writing desk because Poe wrote on both. Physically on a table and on the subject of a raven in the poem.

The explanations in THE BIG SHORT may not have been clear "to a layman," but as someone who worked in the industry (as an IT peon), I can vouch for their accuracy. I had several discussions with co-workers where we wondered when the whole shebang would fall apart.

Im fairly certain in the world of Wonderland, nothing is supposed to make sense. The riddle was never intended to have an answer, because the answer doesn't matter. The Hatter is Mad after all.

I once heard an answer to Alice In Wonderland's riddle: "Why is a raven like a writing desk?" and yes, the answer is as elliptical as the riddle itself: "The higher, the fewer." Meaning the higher you go, the fewer you're likely to encounter...in both writing desks, and ravens. Okay, wait, at 4:36 you just called the "Interceptor" the "Inceptor".

@jonforbing9013

5 ай бұрын

The best I ever heard was "They both have inky quills."

YES YES YES THANK YOU - the layout of the T-Rex enclosure has annoyed the HELL out of me since originally seeing the movie!!!!! THANK YOU!

You're wrong about the Saving Private Ryan part. The one shot at the end is the one Tom Hanks let go. The one who came down the stairs is a different one. They just look the same.

I actually thought The Big Short did an amazing job explaining complicated financial concepts. I left the movie feeling that I understood all the important details.

@ludgatecircus15

4 ай бұрын

So right. Some films require exposition to help out, and The Big Short struck the good balance.

My favorite answer to "Why is a raven like a writing desk?" is "Poe wrote on both of them".

Ellie Sadler isn’t at the T. rex attack she’s back at the compound after helping the triceratops

On the subject of End Game. Rodgers on the bench is supposed to be confirmation that the time line is intact without divergence (hence the Banner/Blanchet conversation). The rub is the Loki divergence scenario that causes more logic puzzles… many other repercussions or fate vs free will debates… but I digress.

Dom didn't actually beat the train at the end of The Fast and the Furious. All the other movies are him living out a crazy adrenaline fueled version of his afterlife. That's my head canon to make any sense of the rest of the movies.

@dohadeer8242

5 ай бұрын

Actually that works, nice!

I thought the 'real' answer to the "How is a raven like a writing desk?" according to Carroll is "Because it is nevar written backward." The joke got lost because a book editor corrected 'nevar' to 'never'.

Steve's ending in Endgame was explained, he returned the stones to the correct points in history, thus negating the branching of the timelines, so him being there at the end has two flaws, first, that no one noticed him sitting there sooner, and second, that in order for him to be there at the end without using the time travel gimmick means he was always there. The first of those relies on the idea that the Winter Soldier, Falcon, and Hulk didn't think it odd that someone else was there, but the second issue means that Steve had to choose to let events play out the exact same way as he remembered them, so Steve let Loki invade New York, he let Tony create Ultron, he let the Avengers fall apart; basically, in order for Steve to get his happily ever after without creating a separate timeline Steve had to let a lot of people suffer and die. Or, to put a nicer spin on things, maybe Steve did act all along the timeline and without his unknown help things would've been worse; also, since we knew Peggy Carter had children and we now know who the father was we know there are potential Super Soldiers out there.

Gisele’s return? My money is on twins. They’ve not used that one yet.

Thank you for bringing up the Jurassic Park one. I noticed that so long ago but never really saw anyone mention it. So its good to have a reason for it.

Most of these are just because people don't pay attention or just turn off their brains while watching movies. But I don't know ANYBODY who gets Tenet.

Avengers- it's all a time loop. Nothing changed, because it had all happened before- which is hinted in prior films. Such as Peggy having two kids, with an unkown father. Steve was there all long.

How is a raven like a writing desk? Edgar Allen Poe wrote on them both!!

Those who saw TENET confusing because they're used to scripts that had characters explain everything OUT LOUD so dumb audience could understand.

"Why is a Raven like a writing desk?" What are they Raven on about?

There is an answer for 'How is a Raven like a writing desk?' It was in Lewis Carroll's notes. They are both 'nevar' placed backwards. Yeah, it was kinda weak. He knew it too, which is why he changed it to the non answer.

You can't assume real-world rules, like the laws of physics, apply with fictional stories. Why bring up the Pirates of the Caribbean boat holding the air bubble underwater but then handwave the Fast and Furious laws of physics later in the video?

I can't believe people are confused about how Steve Rodgers got back. In order to time travel you need a suit that can handle the quantum energy. We see Steve Rodgers wearing a suit when going back in time so obviously he kept the suit until he got very old and Peggy died. Then he put that suit on again, traveled back to 2023, took the suit off, walked to the park bench, and sat down. If you don't think that's possible then it shouldn't be possible for Steve and Tony to return after going back further in time to get the space stone and more Pym particles because they went from one changed timeline to another point in time and changed those events as well.

@symeonnoemys6838

5 ай бұрын

He would still have to travel back to the pad, though. I think Steve staying was canon, so the time lines never branched. I think that's also why Alexei said in Black Widow that he fought him once. Any branches in the time line would be destroyed by Kang regardless, so Steve and Peggy's timeline would have been short lived...

@RomaroBrandon

5 ай бұрын

@@symeonnoemys6838 not if he ditched the suit before Hulk tried to bring him back. Alternatively he traveled back to the pad at another point in time like a few seconds after they all traveled to time then ditched the suit. Also it's not short lived otherwise Steve would be dead and not in 2023 at all.

@Tranzzform

5 ай бұрын

There is even a more straightforward explanation than that. We are simply watching the timeline where Steve went back and stayed. he made peace with it all when he promised Tony not to change the past. This showed he had the peace to allow him to sit on the side lines during all the events that had happened.

@symeonnoemys6838

5 ай бұрын

I don't see Kang letting a timeline exist for 60 odd years just to make cap happy. I feel like cap creating a branch in time to exist with Peggy defeats the point of him going back in time to make sure he fixes all the branches in time... He might still use the time jump when Peggy dies, as you say, I just think it's in this timeline

I think the Toy Story one is actually a kinda joke about the story being changed for kids toy.

That Saving Private Ryan one has wrecked my head... haha

While Steve's return in Endgame did cause some issues, I don't think the issue presented here is accurate. Steve didn't need to change the past in order to live out his life in his original universe with Peggy. Nor did he necessarily need to create (or move to) a parallel universe. He had the 'spacetime GPS' from Stark, so... once he put all of the stones back in place, the young him could have travelled back to his original universe in the past and stayed there. It just creates the problem that there are 2 Stever Roger's in that universe and that the Steve Roger's we know and love just hid in the background of that universe his whole life, waiting for that one moment where he could come out of hiding. It's weird as hell and troubling... but it's not exactly a spacetime paradox... just a storyline one.

I'm sorry, there are people who think the German soldier who stabs Mellish is the Willie character who was saved earlier? They are clearly different people and Willie shows up later and shoots Miller, before being shot by Upham. Are people really that stupid?

I always felt wrt Avengers Endgame and the Steve Rogers arc, that Steve did go back to an alternative timeline, lived with Peggy until her death, and then used the last of the Pim particles to come back to the main timeline sometime before the final scene, maybe to say goodbye to everyone and give Sam the shield. He could, of course, have done those things in the new, alternative timeline, but he would rightfully know that these weren't his friends/the Avengers he knew. Or, of course, it could be that the writers didn't actually understand what they were writing at all, and went for the feel-good ending despite the fact it doesn't really work in the universe they built. :p But I'll go with my own thought, which means it does make sense. And that would have allowed Steve to actually do more than hide out quietly with Peggy the whole time and never interact with the world, which doesn't really go with his personality.

@button9

5 ай бұрын

my theory, is that a “perfect timeline” was created out there and he lived that perfect timeline, righting the wrongs of everything he possibly could in his power with all his foreknowledge (and basically brought a shield back in perfect condition because it was hardly used) , then once time converged/caught up, he jumped back. I just can’t imagine him ducking out on things he knows he could prevent and even though he knows it won’t help “his” world, he was able to make a difference and see a relatively perfect outcome.

Why is a raven like a writing desk? Poe wrote on both.

@dohadeer8242

5 ай бұрын

A raven is like a writing desk because one of their sides is both the same...

I don’t think you know what “infamous” means

Dark Star. One of the most awesome nutball enigmas of a movie of all time.

The two soldiers in Saving Private Ryan had to be the same guy. He knew Uppams name!

Steve Rogers' Return actually makes sense if you realize one thing: the MCU was *always* the alternate in which Steve stayed.

that cant be true about the saving private ryan part.

How is a raven like a writing desk? Edgar Allan Poe wrote poems on both of them.

10:09 You didn't figure out Steve's photo on Peggy's desk in the 70s was of the current Steve? He was too busy posing as Captain America and fighting WWII to pose for a Steve Rogers pic. So he didn't change the past, Peggy never told anyone Steve was alive. Best Time travel Example to what Steve did: Lost season 5; Steve made notes of the things he had to do in order not to change things, something like "the photo on your desk has to be this one now." It's the people who complain "OMG, Steve could have changed things!" that really don't get it. Steve was the Constant.

For me it was Army of the Dead, so many things left unanswered

The explanation for Steve in Endgame is relatively simple. When Steve went back in time, his first act created a divergence. You now have two timelines, each with a Steve. As time goes on, you get more divergences, more variants, but you'll still have that one version of Steve that managed to live all the way to the bench without changing events at all. If all possible eventualities occur in some universe or another, then Endgame just happens to take place in thr reality where Steve gets to the bench, and there are a million others where he didn't. We just don't follow them so we can get our nice moment.

@WhatCulture that is the hoof of the goat which was eaten not the claw of the T-Rex

Margot Robbie in a bubble bath is reason enough to watch The Big Short, no matter how confusing it is.

Giselle was never found dead. IIRC there was no effort made to verify that she had died. SInce Owen Shaw had also fallen down onto the world's longest tarmac and he came back, there's no reason to believe that Giselle couldn''t have, too.

The end of the Chris Rock film "I think I love my wife",the whole film had me unable to hide the WTF'ness on my face but the spontaneous "aria's" forever etched this film into my being.

No, you're wrong about Endgame. In the the end, what Banner said could still be true IF the Endgame film existed in the alternate universe. There was a scene - I think in The First Avenger - where Peggy Carter had someone that wasn't directly revealed to the audience but wasn't seen. It was strongly hinted this was Steve and she couldn't reveal him to Steve from the other timeline.

Wait.. so a curse on the pirates that took the gold originally making them undead until every piece was returned and you accept that... but the scene two people walking on the bottom of the ocean with a boat above them full of air is taking things too far into the realm of unbelievability? Ok....

Did the channel change management/ownership ? I recall it being very different

“Why is a raven like a writing desk?” “Because [Edgar Allan] Poe wrote on both.”

The answer to most of these is: "Shush. Just don't think about it."

In Endgame, returning the infinity stones restores the timeline to its original path... mostly. Loki's escape remained because he created an alternate timeline which led into Loki s1 while another him was created/restored when gems were returned and died at the hands of Thanos.

The Mad Hatter is insane it’s not supposed to make sense.

Not just that re the T Rex pen - why when while they were spending the night in the tree - other dinosaurs were in there - seems also the pen was wide open to the rest of the park - not like they went over ANOTHER huge fence or anything!

saving private Ryan has glaring errors at the end. The soldier coming down the stairs has clear SS insignia on his lapels (and would not have let Upham live as SS are fanatics). At the end Upham shoots a soldier but why? the soldier has a Wehrmacht tunic and so is not the SS man on the stairs and also Upham could not have seen who shot Captain Miller - more than 1 German had the same rifle so he could not distinguish rifle sounds and Upham was unsighted on the German soldiers at the time Miller was shot. Lets forget the fact that bridge cannot take the weight of a Tiger (56 tonnes) nor a plane take out a Tiger with such a precise hit

They are wearing weight on their feet in the clip you provided in Pirates

Open to interpretation is fine

So glad you addressed that walking at the bottom of the ocean scene it Pirates. I NEVER understood the science behind it lol

@5th_cellar

5 ай бұрын

It was just a little nod to The Crimson Pirate starring Burt Lancaster, I doubt they thought much about it beyond that.

@chrismckenzie3414

5 ай бұрын

I was wondering if anyone would mention that. @@5th_cellar

@5th_cellar

5 ай бұрын

@@chrismckenzie3414 I was very disappointed no one else did

“onimously”

Is there a theory that Jack Sparrow is actually some sort of trickster god or something? It would make a lot of sense.

The toy Buzz thinks Zerg is his father is based off Andy's memory of the movie. He's seen older buzz and thought it was his father... Kids tend to have different memories about movies. That's my guess🤔

Saving Private Ryan is pretty easy one soldier let an enemy live and it got an ally killed and so did the other. The soldier that walked past Oppum technically got his war buddy killed that Oppum convinced the Captain to spare

This is a stupid example but in perks of being a wallflower when they're listening to Heroes in the car going through the tunnel and the kids are like 'what is this song', it takes these kids, who are supposed to be indie kids who pride themselves on their old fahioned music taste, a year to work out what the song is. You're telling me they don't recognise David Bowie? I know it's based on a book, and the song probably isn't specificied, but choosing one of the most popular and instantly recognisable songs of the 80s was a wierd choice.

@AcidRain1981

5 ай бұрын

I've read the book, and seen the movie multiple times. In the book the song they hear and search for is indeed never specified. Obviously being a movie, they couldn't possibly do the same thing. It's indeed odd that they would choose such a well known artist. The time period is the early 90's, back then the internet wasn't publicly available yet so they had to search through catalogs, library audio and radio stations. But David Bowie was already known for a while, and the song in question was 10+ years old at the time. Even though the writer of the book directed the movie himself, i think in this case he went the symbolic way instead of logical. Or he was just a Bowie fan and took the chance to use this song .

In Dune 2, it seemed that Paul’s eyes turned blue halfway thru. Was that real or just in my head?

I disagreed by about your attacks on the big shot. It was perfectly clear. If you didn’t understand then sorry you werent paying attention

@Tangent360

5 ай бұрын

Agreed. I didn't understand those things before but the explanations given by Margot Robbie, Selena Gomez, etc did a great job of clearing things up.

Showing Primer at the beginning was a nice callback. The movie that comes with a manual.

@Scottlp2

5 ай бұрын

If it comes with a manual why are there many discussions/detailed explanations and a crazy diagram to explain it? (Haven’t seen it).

@cannibalholiday

5 ай бұрын

@@Scottlp2it's a user created manual. that diagram being part of it. it's nuts how many layers there were.

Why is a raven like a writing desk? Both were written on by Edgar Allen Poe.

2001s ending is pretty straightforward. However, in 2010, this world changing event appears to have never occurred...

Ellie Sattler wasn't there when the Trex broke out.

Steve held on to his Pym Particals so after Peggy died in his new timeline he reverted ro the previous one to say goodbye to his friends 👍

What confuses me is why Adam can’t pronounce Gal Gadot’s name correctly. “Gah dot.” Not “gah dough.”

I feel the Jurassic Park one needs a follow up: how did the T-Rex, whom the film establishes to be heavy enough to make water in a glass ripple with its footsteps while still a fair distance away, manage to sneak into the park's visitor center at the end to take out the two raptors without anyone noticing?

The other timeline might still have methods to jump timelines. Especially since he'd being going back with a portion of the necessary tech. I don't see how that's confusing.

My head Canon for future Buzz is that he actually went through all the things that inspired the toy version of homeless and Zurg is and always is buzz's fater, when future buzz came back it altered the timeline and created an alternative universe where old buzz killed original zurg after he conceived buzz and then became Zurg to get what he wanted!

i'm still puzzled at idea so many people got puzzled by TeneT when it's actually said in the beginning how "poisoned tooth" work. The only reason protagonist doesn't even got name and all later mumbo-jumbo happened is that Washington's hero never made it alive past him being captured at railway tracks. all movie is his dying conscience picturing last big fantasy before curtain falls for good.

Actually the fast x makes sense to me. We saw Shaw's brother fly through a windshield and survive in fast 6 at about the same height so why couldn't Gisele. Mr nobody could've found her laying in the brush and nursed her back to life just like owen was. She not wanting to hurt Han even more emotionally decided to remain dead until he came back to life.

In Fast and Furious. I'm shocked they didn't bring back Jesse. I mean, they brought back Han and his gf after all

@tylerleitzke

5 ай бұрын

Well Jesse died in the first movie, Han didn't. The movies weren't released in chronological order. Chronologically, Tokyo Drift takes place after other Fast & Furious movies. At the end of Fast 5 when Han and Gisele are in the Lexus LFA they discuss going to Tokyo and Han says they'll get there eventually. After Han "dies" in Tokyo drift, Gisele goes to Mexico for Fast & Furious (fourth movie).

@hocksue

5 ай бұрын

@@tylerleitzke hope Jesse would come back in the last from

is adam ok? this guy sounds like adam-after-reconditioning. i hope all is well and fully expect the exuberant adam to return

Upman? Is a superhero who jumps? Christ…

My Steve Theory: I don’t think that Steve actually lived out his entire life in 616. I think he went back to his original timeline to live with Peggy (since we know that his timeline was never supposed to change) then when Peggy passed away, Old Man Steve had a means to return to the classic 616 universe, so technically, Steve DID return to the place where he was supposed to, just by going the long way around.

@Fadaar

5 ай бұрын

not to nitpick but it's not 616, thats the comics. MCU is 199999.

'what the hell is going on?' Tenet

Tiny nitpick: Upham, not Upman.

Yeah, the big short was an amazing movie, but i could not wrap my head around a lot of the financial concepts. Especially the synthetic sticks or bonds or whatever it was. I tried to watch that scene a few times and it just made no sense to me. I wonder how much of the fact that these concepts are so obtuse and convoluted is actually why the system collapsed so spectacularly - they appeared to have gotten a million miles away from anything that had anything to do with real money growing from real production.

Who's Corporal Upman?

It’s gonna out it’s not Giselle in FFXI it’s her twin sister. Or a clone.