So many years, crap teachers tried to make us hate math. Every science is built on small logical steps. If only i had a teacher like this, taking the time to explain those logical steps, then my life at the university would be much more cool...Thank you so much sir!

Anyone here during this lock down?? He's a great teacher indeed

Hey man. This is great! I did this stuff at uni nearly 45 years ago. I learnt it all from books and must have passed an exam in it, but it never really stuck. (To tell you the truth, I've never had to use it in my career, and I'm close to retirement now.) But, for the love of mathematics, I finally understand it, and that is all thanks to your detailed presentation. I cannot tell you how grateful I am.

@murtadhaalkenani3876

6 ай бұрын

"I've never had to use it in my career" is something both sweet and bad to hear, can you give us a bit of your knowledge of what things we should focus on and what not, as engineering students ?

@itzikovadia851

6 ай бұрын

I used it in electric engineering in electronic circuit transform function and control system to evaluate the stability

This Electrical Engineer, who is also great teacher of mathematics who can explain the full details and reviews how those steps are derived are the ONES we need in this world of ENGINEERING.

Your videos are the reason I'm gonna pass ODEs. Infinite likes!

Thank you so much, Jason. this is very helpful for me. It's very difficult to find a teacher or lecturer who teaches mathematics clearly like you. Stay like this, I think you will be a new teacher in my life, especially in mathematics

You are a great teacher. I wish I had you in college. You're worth your weight in gold... no, worth my weight in gold. 😁

@richards_greatman

11 ай бұрын

Funny!

What you have done here is really important. Derivations are very important for understanding and unfortunately there is a lot of maths today done by students by being given the formulae and just applying it. Thats ok provided they have at least once, derived that tool I have not done LTs for decades but your clear analysis is a doddle - so I've learnt it all again after an engineering career. Well done!!

@MathAndScience

4 жыл бұрын

I really appreciate it! Jason, MathAndScience.com

God bless you and your family sir. This has helped me a lot. I appreciate it

If today 's education is not more important than a university degree, then I have enough knowledge about your lessons and I can better understand my teacher at home, I respect you. From Somalia🇸🇴💕💕🇸🇴

Though I agree that some lecturers did not spend the time to do the details, one of the culprits in this case is the requirement by the schools that certain topics have to be completed in a given time frame. This limits any discretion on the part of the teacher/lecturer.

You are just incomparable sir! May. God bless you more with knowledge and wisdom

Great explanation for this interesting item. Thank you, Jason!

THIS GUY IS AMAZING

I have been following and I am glad I did. Made more comprehensible.

Thank you, you are a very good teacher. Really clear writing and steps

Thank you so much Sir. This is the best video tutorial I've watched on Laplace Transform.

Wonderfully done!!! Thanks

An awesome teacher indeed. Thank you.

No one can explain like this in whole KZread

Thank you for your patient teaching and explaining....really helped to go back to basics and strengthen them!! I am able to get a hang of laplace all thanks to you!

Your way of teaching is clear to me that why I inspire to full fill my goal God bless you...

I loved mathematics because of you thank you very much!!!

u literally are making my night sir, Thank you

Your Videos are simply amazing .. Thank you

Best maths teacher ever I must say

Thank you so much for the information..your teaching skills are excellent.

I CAN NEVER THANK YOU ENOUGH SIR

really loved it sir huge respect for your knowledge

surprisingly how simpler the Laplace transform of cosine and sine. thank you, Sir

Excellent teaching indeed!

Thank you so so much, sir. I'm getting so much value.

Sir, We greatly appreciate your work 🙏😊.

You sir are a true saint!

I almost have given up in class, thank you for this motivation

An excellent teacher! ❤

thanks man i really appreciate your work

Thank you and bless you for this video. 🙌🏽👏🏼🙏,

i swear you are a legend, THANK YOU!

This is great sir.thank you

Such an excellent teacher. You're so Amazing sir.

Thank you so much 😊 , you really helped me

Perfect Dr. ...

wow this is amazing...thank you for your time to make this video ....

thank you sir, very much appreciated

Studying this for my control dynamics class because my teacher didn’t taught me this :’). Great video and amazingly explained

Not all heroes wear capes

老师讲得太赞了！

I love your lesson sir

good lectures very helpful

nice work sir, thanks

Thank you sir you made Laplace transform made easy.

HOW ARE YOU SO GOOD! Thank you so much

Dear teacher, really, it's my first time to understand this topic thank you so much

@IvanKiprono-mn6eo

Жыл бұрын

it is perfect

Saved my semester

Perfect 👍

Thank you sir for your suchn a wonderful way of explanation make easier to understand a problem.Take love from Bangladesh.

Of course this too is interesting to know, the classical derivation, from the roots, of L T of cosine and sine, but there is a much more elegant and straightforward way to derive both at the same time. Just treat the cos(βt) & sin(βt) as the real and imaginary parts of e^(iβt) and you will get 1/(1-iβ) and multiplying top and bottom with the complex conjugate you'll get (s+iβ)/(s^2 + β^2)

All videos are super

very nice and calmly paced explanation. I think you can circumvent integration by parts by using $\cos \beta t = 1/2( e^{j\beta t} + e^{-j\beta t} )$. And one thing more: i think the condition should be Re(s)>0 (s>0 is not well defined for s complex)

Sir can we change the cos(βt) in exponential form then we can find the Laplace transform ∟(cosβt) easily.

Thank you so much. well understood😉

Superb explaination

What a man.

Ur supper amazing 😍😍😍 thank you so much

Sir for integration by part isnt u will be cosbtdt and dv will be e to power of - st ?

THANK YOU

i understand now this has made laplace easy.

I'm trying my level best to finish all his videos

for integration by parts formula, doesnt u= the trig function and dv= exponential. The order of substitution for u i learnt was liate where logs,inverse,algebraic, trig, exponential. since trig was higher on the list u would be trig right?

A star inded, thanks

Thank u a lot it is great lesson and very intersting I used thad before 40 years a go 🤣 now I refresh my memorize for fan

god bless you

Very clear explanation thank you sir

@MathAndScience

4 жыл бұрын

You are very welcome!

I would calculate Real part if the Laplace transform of e^(ibt)

Gr8t tutorial so far

Sir why always Exponent in U instead of the trig? LIATE right?

@abdulrahmanmohammad2811

2 жыл бұрын

It really doesn’t matter if ur able to integrate any one of them. In both ways it will still work and u will get the same answer.

I'm not sure why you didn't use LIATE while doing the bi parts integral

bah, 14:50 paused the video because i didnt understand why second B wasnt squeard. checked my lacking math skills for 30 min. still didnt get it and went back to the video only to find it was squared after all. I suck..

@MathAndScience

6 жыл бұрын

I've done things like that before! Get our Free App and View all Lessons! www.MathTutorApp.com

@bluebloo5574

6 жыл бұрын

haha, that is a mistake that I usually made when doing calculation. So, I thought that was his mistake at that moment.

@parente1998

5 жыл бұрын

i just paused and came to the comments to see that ahah Thanks mate xD

@joebob2311productions

5 жыл бұрын

i read this comment before the video, then the same thing happened to me, then i was like oh

Applying LIATE when choosing u and dv exponential should be dv while trigonometry is u.

@abdulrahmanmohammad2811

2 жыл бұрын

It really doesn’t matter if ur able to integrate any one of them. In both ways it will still work and u will get the same answer.

If you open your control theory book they say: Applying the definition we can EASILY see that...

Sir i have got a question shouldn't you take cos=u in the beginning since it is a trigonometric function and has the priority compared to the number of e ?

@tinytuny97

4 жыл бұрын

@glyn hodges Thank you very much for the info

@abdulrahmanmohammad2811

2 жыл бұрын

It really doesn’t matter if ur able to integrate any one of them. In both ways it will still work and u will get the same answer.

@ivymagoma2561

Жыл бұрын

@@abdulrahmanmohammad2811 no u wont i tried

@ivymagoma2561

Жыл бұрын

it gives u Beta at the numerator rather than S ...if im wrong plz tell me

good work

when integrating by parts why didnt you pick cos as u because of the formular liate?

@olayiwolaeniafe8133

8 ай бұрын

When dealing with cases like this, it's very much easier choosing your U to be an expression that can be differentiated easily

I love you. That's all

Why is it that we can't let u=cos(bt) and dv= e^-st?

@abdulrahmanmohammad2811

2 жыл бұрын

It really doesn’t matter if ur able to integrate any one of them. In both ways it will still work and u will get the same answer.

My professor doesnt even lecture. Thank you for your videos!!

Am really enjoying ur class But don't know how to use cosh and solve a problem Someone should plz help me

What if I take my u=cosBt?

@ivandominicalegre2158

3 жыл бұрын

I agree, base on LIATE of Integration by parts.

@abdulrahmanmohammad2811

2 жыл бұрын

It really doesn’t matter if ur able to integrate any one of them. In both ways it will still work and u will get the same answer.

i love you

But for laplace cos(ax) we have very easy law to find integration

it's more easy with u=cos(Bt)

Puneet bhaiya

I Dont understand , how this integration by parts is done , because the ILATE rule is violated.

@najir85

5 жыл бұрын

This is LIATE rule not ILATE

@jimaginarydialectic4682

5 жыл бұрын

The LIATE rule isn’t actually a rigorous requirement, just a method for prioritizing that might lead to a quicker solution.

@abdulrahmanmohammad2811

2 жыл бұрын

It really doesn’t matter if ur able to integrate any one of them. In both ways it will still work and u will get the same answer.

2024 and still the best

Plz not cos but cosh

All is wrong! Must be u = cos(Bt) and dv = e^(-st)dt

NAOLSS STUDY

Gr8t tutorial so far

Gr8t tutorial so far