Lesics was founded by Sabin Mathew, an IIT Delhi post graduate in 2012. At Lesics, we aim to provide quality engineering education. Our videos are designed to clear misconceptions, create a passion for engineering and explain complicated technologies in a simple way.
This channel is currenlty in the brink of a shutdown. Your support at Patreon is valuable to us : www.patreon.com/Lesics
Cheers Sabin
Пікірлер
What's with the cursed A-10 with the usually normal engine placement
Elephants should be the standard metric for all weights 😂😂
fr jeddah tower is just the arabian version of "The Shard"
Tuned, not tooned.
Now I understand why to use suction device after refilling my cartridge❤
0:51 that woman hitting the pole was everything
Great video! I learned a lot watching this with my son.
Very informative and easy to understand. Thanks for also providing the demonstration with the coke can.
Please.
E480579. Does the lock key make sense? Yes because even thou the key was there the rest of the keys couldn't open up the lock. It takes that specific key TO open up the lock after it was close.
Angry birds plane is not a plane,the real Inventor of Plane with engine is Drummond de Andrade!! 🇧🇷
Angry birds plane is not a plane,the real Inventor of Plane with engine is Santos Dumont de Andrade!! 🇧🇷
for crying out loud... they turn the wheel!!!
Geez the can is under all of that weight which is not representative of what actually happened…during the collapse the damaged section is on top of an intact structure…a pile driver effect is not physically possible…this video is BS
Why do some dams always have water gushing in waterfalls?
That is not how you do a hill start. You have the handbrake/parking brake on the you find the bite point then release the handbrake and accelerate
Which is better Depends if youre lazier or if u prefer your things to work... I like things to do what they're told to do like go when I hit the gas instead of rev and not move for a second so manual is better
I wouldn't call the poop trucks an engineering secret...
The moment he talked about microphone and speaker, everything became clear to me.. like a revelation.. awesome!
You explained everything where a 10 year old could understand, how are people this stupid
this was amazing! Thank you!
My long day confusion and doubt is cleared by this 3 minute video. GREAT EXPLANATION
Știați ca această masina a fost inventată de un inginer? Ce a primit acel inginer? A primit Premiul Nobel pentru Medicină si "Filosofie". Da! Inginerii muncesc serios in medicină, da' un cioban are o altă părere! Inginerii înțeleg perfect cum funcționează corpul uman!
Ok, very high maintenance building the smallest neglect or disrepair and this is the most dangerous building on the planet also . i.e the Challenger and the Columbia almost every major airline disaster …. Arrogance, cost cutting,inferior maintenance workers etc…. Man is always sooo impressed with himself and what he perceives to be mastery of Nature…. yeah ok the Hindenburg of the Desert
This is kinda mind blowing.
This is such bs.. oh and the titanic was 46,000 tonnes, not 38,000.
Or not. The weight of the Titanic was 52,310 tons. 47,454 metric tons. Gross register tonnage is not a weight, it's a measure of volume. Either way, MORE weight only reinforces the argument.
"Best of both worlds" > Can't climb steep hill "Cheaper to repair" > expensive af to repair
Only Nikola Tesla
Bullshit.. 😂 that not physics it's fkn manipulation
And yet strangely not wrong. Not what you want to or have been conditioned to believe perhaps, but not wrong. This video is far from perfect - not even the best Twin Towers collapse video put out in 2023 (I prefer this one: kzread.info/dash/bejne/lmeaw8GOqpjaorg.html&ab_channel=cjnewson88 ) and in a couple of spots is even a bit cringe, still: The *collapse mechanisms - the sequence of failures - described here by Lesics are substantially correct* and this is true *no matter who planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks or why* . That may go against 20+ years of entrenched dogma and conditioning, but it’s not wrong. That also means (in case you did not get the hint) this video can be (and IS) absolutely correct in its description of Twin Towers collapse mechanisms AND the 9/11 attacks could still have been some sort of inside job. The two things are in no way mutually exclusive. The mechanisms described here have broad professional support around the world. There are no professional engineering organizations (for example: ASCE, ASEE, ICE, etc) that disagree with them or have offered any formal dissenting opinions or alternative hypothesis. The mechanisms described here are not new. They have been well understood since at least November 2001 and most can be easily confirmed by simple observation. You can literally see just about everything they are talking about if you just bother to look. So either the overwhelming majority of the worlds structural engineers and simple observation are wrong,… … or you are. Which seems more likely? IF you *still -think- **_believe_** this explanation is wrong then produce a better one* . Good luck with that. No one _ever_ has and I don’t see you moving that needle today. No one _ever_ does.
Excellent video
kzread.info/dash/bejne/eaeVwc-Kh9zNk5c.html
If it was easy to understand the working of AC, everyone could make their own and also its price would be low
If it was easy to understand the working of AC, everyone could make their own and also its price would be low
Vv
Then they introduced double story wagons and your video is old?
Lmao. People be forgetting that even the impossible can happen. The title of this video is ridiculous, its like trying to say just because a 100 year old person hasn’t died that their immortal 🤦
Just amazing thanks
obviously it’s a female
😅😅😅😅well information good show you 😅😅😅
It takes aprox 9 seconds for a stone to fall on the ground at that height. And that tower fell in 10secs. This video makes sense
Are you sure? Did you measure that yourself? I did. The entire collapse took 33 seconds +/- 1 second.
thanks for the very detail explanation
Hi
Wow
make one about masrum antena
Can you please do a video with an older manual transmission--one without synchronization? (Also what some modern tractor-trailers still use)
at 7:04. The dam construction part reminds me of the show, Big Bigger Biggest
the first part you stole from some other video was good. the rest of the video was trash
0:54 weird glitch
In my opinion,, that's not gonna work in big building.. it's only work at small things like this..
Great video!