Nuclear fuel and Energy | Understanding them Logically

Let's learn about various options of nuclear fuel and their possibilities in this video.
Please be a Lesics team member and get access to exclusive engineering contents:
/ @lesics
/ lesics
LinkedIn : / sabin-mathew
instagram : / sabinsmathew
Twitter : / sabinsmathew
Telegram : t.me/sabinmathew
FB : / sabinzmathew
Voice over artist : www.fiverr.com/flfalcon

Пікірлер: 303

  • @ZoonCrypticon
    @ZoonCrypticon Жыл бұрын

    Could you answer the complex political and economical reasons that hinder the use of thorium in an upcoming video?

  • @00crashtest

    @00crashtest

    Жыл бұрын

    They probably didn't use thorium for power stations because it requires entirety of it to be new R&D, which costs at least tens of billions of dollars, if not hundreds. With uranium, the R&D was already done for them because they are piggybacking off of the research done for military weaponry.

  • @christianbmerges

    @christianbmerges

    Жыл бұрын

    To use the so called "waste" for building bombs.

  • @julianshepherd2038

    @julianshepherd2038

    Жыл бұрын

    'Without exception, [thorium reactors] have never been commercially viable, nor do any of the intended new designs even remotely seem to be viable. Like all nuclear power production they rely on extensive taxpayer subsidies; the only difference is that with thorium and other breeder reactors these are of an order of magnitude greater, which is why no government has ever continued their funding.'

  • @floydbethel2941

    @floydbethel2941

    Жыл бұрын

    It would cost taxpayers money, you cant really justify buidling it when you already have something that does the job, the end.

  • @ibnewton8951

    @ibnewton8951

    Жыл бұрын

    Tantalizing. Lovely presentation but you left me hanging Bud.

  • @javen_raven
    @javen_raven Жыл бұрын

    Fermi "rushing" to the lab is making me laugh too much. Love the vids!

  • @hadensnodgrass3472
    @hadensnodgrass3472 Жыл бұрын

    As a nuclear engineer you did a great job explaining nuclear fission. I am not sure how you got your weight for critical mass, as it has more to due with density and shape of the uranium, but thank you for another great video!

  • @jaikumar848

    @jaikumar848

    Жыл бұрын

    Disadvantages of thorium over uranium ?

  • @plinyvicgames

    @plinyvicgames

    Жыл бұрын

    probably assumed a sphere with a perfect reflector?

  • @plinyvicgames

    @plinyvicgames

    Жыл бұрын

    @@jaikumar848 thorium isnt fissile

  • @huntercasey1019

    @huntercasey1019

    Жыл бұрын

    They got 400kg because that's the smallest amount of fissile material needed for a sustained nuclear reaction in uranium. ~Wiki~

  • @plinyvicgames

    @plinyvicgames

    Жыл бұрын

    @@huntercasey1019 thats definitely not the smallest amount of fissile material needed... but with a bare sphere with no moderator or reflector i would believe it

  • @EothanB
    @EothanB Жыл бұрын

    I legit love your videos, so glad you guys decided to go full force with these simple explanations.

  • @notamangosteen
    @notamangosteen Жыл бұрын

    2:34 what a god Tier walk cycle 😂

  • @818deadboys

    @818deadboys

    Жыл бұрын

    Plug walk

  • @jeffgorchynski

    @jeffgorchynski

    Жыл бұрын

    Fermi definitely deuced his pants

  • @arman4146
    @arman4146 Жыл бұрын

    These is the most detailed and easy to understand video about nuclear fission for the first timers.

  • @okithdesilva129
    @okithdesilva129 Жыл бұрын

    Lesics videos are very useful to learn a lot of things about engineering!

  • @okithdesilva129
    @okithdesilva129 Жыл бұрын

    This is the video I've been waiting for!

  • @okithdesilva129
    @okithdesilva129 Жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much for this insane video!

  • @phs125
    @phs125 Жыл бұрын

    Thank you SO MUCH for this video. I don't know why youtube waited 10 hours before recommending this video. Nuclear energy is the future of energy in Earth. Solar and wind can f off. Nuclear is so much more carbon neutral and so much more eco friendly, It's about time all 7 billion humans know the exact science behind nuclear energy...

  • @reedakh
    @reedakh Жыл бұрын

    I am working on sustainable energy , it's very helpful, thank ya much

  • @pablollanso5093
    @pablollanso5093 Жыл бұрын

    Amazing! Such an important discovery

  • @okithdesilva129
    @okithdesilva129 Жыл бұрын

    I'm fascinated by Nuclear energy!

  • @FixItStupid

    @FixItStupid

    Жыл бұрын

    It Will Kill All

  • @PointyTailofSatan
    @PointyTailofSatan Жыл бұрын

    BTW: many beaches in Brazil are composed of monazite sand. A percentage of this sand is composed of thorium oxides. As a result, the beach is quite radioactive. So much so, in fact, that if you take a fun day on the beach, you would reach the yearly ionizing radiation limit set by the EU. And seeing that the half life of thorium is 14 billion years, this radiation isn't going away any time soon. 🙂

  • @786YOUR_BF

    @786YOUR_BF

    9 ай бұрын

    You are brazilian 👍🏻👍🏻

  • @786YOUR_BF

    @786YOUR_BF

    9 ай бұрын

    WE HAVE LARGEST RESERVE 🥱

  • @kennethhicks2113
    @kennethhicks2113 Жыл бұрын

    Do Fusion and what's holding us back considering we have working thermonuclear devices in relation to Energy yield per weight of fuel etc. Ty, great channel, keep'em coming!

  • @Watchyn_Yarwood
    @Watchyn_Yarwood11 ай бұрын

    You identified the Thorium issue 100% correct!

  • @darshanvaibhav9098
    @darshanvaibhav9098 Жыл бұрын

    Bro . Really thanks for this video . I have listen the same in class but I got to know complete information by this video

  • @gaveintothedarkness
    @gaveintothedarkness Жыл бұрын

    Fermi - animated to be realistic and lifelike Einstein - looks like a meme version of himself

  • @hritiksakpal53
    @hritiksakpal53 Жыл бұрын

    Waiting for this one from so long.. Please make videos more related to nuclear power generation

  • @RoYal-xz5ch

    @RoYal-xz5ch

    Жыл бұрын

    Nuclear engineer banoge kya

  • @hritiksakpal53

    @hritiksakpal53

    Жыл бұрын

    @@RoYal-xz5ch already an electrical engineer.. Power Generation is part of electrical engg

  • @Freelinemodificator
    @Freelinemodificator Жыл бұрын

    This is awesome & good explaining with simply animation🙏😁....

  • @sahilkumar6965
    @sahilkumar69652 ай бұрын

    IT IS A MASTERPIECE. SO FLUENT EXPLANATION

  • @vickclash7955
    @vickclash7955 Жыл бұрын

    Very good content.

  • @GFKCEG
    @GFKCEG Жыл бұрын

    Can you explain the last question on your next video? Love your content! ❤️

  • @Glamour_in_Gold
    @Glamour_in_Gold Жыл бұрын

    Watched whole video. Very interesting 😊

  • @justinsiebel9705
    @justinsiebel9705 Жыл бұрын

    I finally get it. Also appreciate the characters in your narrative. Can you bring back the chicken?

  • @maximus5438
    @maximus5438 Жыл бұрын

    This is one of the most interesting things that we made. Thank you for posting this.

  • @mongtebobchannel
    @mongtebobchannel Жыл бұрын

    Thankyou for knowledge

  • @N0Xa880iUL
    @N0Xa880iUL Жыл бұрын

    Thank you for this video. The world needs nuclear energy.

  • @IMQ567
    @IMQ567 Жыл бұрын

    Excellent video

  • @shubhamyadav208
    @shubhamyadav208 Жыл бұрын

    Very nice video 👏🏻👏🏻

  • @andersemanuel
    @andersemanuel Жыл бұрын

    This was super good and clear. The ending was a cliffhanger though.. please explain

  • @viniciusnoyoutube
    @viniciusnoyoutube Жыл бұрын

    Excellent video.

  • @baijuupadhyay6891
    @baijuupadhyay6891 Жыл бұрын

    Dear lesics I kindly request you to make video on Ship dynamics ,its engine with your unmatchable graphics We gain a lot from your videos Thanks a ton

  • @amitzerikunthe7635
    @amitzerikunthe7635 Жыл бұрын

    Love from India ❤️

  • @makerj514
    @makerj514 Жыл бұрын

    Thanks for sharing 1

  • @abdulraheemabdulqadeer4097
    @abdulraheemabdulqadeer4097 Жыл бұрын

    This really helped me with my 12th phy

  • @pippopluto4449
    @pippopluto4449 Жыл бұрын

    Hi hello, I just would like to make a question for better understanding. I see in this video that the reaction is based on destabilization of the physical mass of nucleo and real values are not integer, so radioactivity is still in what remains untill the product find stability right? This means producing a lot of material that is shooting material all around right?

  • @gangclub737
    @gangclub737 Жыл бұрын

    Would you upload a video of how a touchscreen works?

  • @_KUNDAN_PATEL
    @_KUNDAN_PATEL Жыл бұрын

    Nice Video

  • @neophyte1994
    @neophyte1994 Жыл бұрын

    I know nothing about chemistry let alone nuclear matter but man this is some interesting stuff

  • @anishashee8511
    @anishashee8511 Жыл бұрын

    We can also use Plutonium 239 from U238 by using a Breeder reactors. Pu 239 is quite efficient in nuclear fission.

  • @PraveenKumar-pu4nz
    @PraveenKumar-pu4nz Жыл бұрын

    Awsome sir

  • @Rgbutubeuser
    @Rgbutubeuser Жыл бұрын

    Please make more videos on nuclear reactions or radioactive elements.

  • @Alasdair-Morrison
    @Alasdair-Morrison Жыл бұрын

    Gotta love some of those animations lol 🤣😂

  • @fernandor3854
    @fernandor3854 Жыл бұрын

    2:30 that's how I rush to the toilet after the coffee kicks in...

  • @SALESENGLISH2020
    @SALESENGLISH2020 Жыл бұрын

    Really useful! To impart general STEM knowledge to the first-year college students, I am writing about Fission reactors, *Thorium* reactors, Fusion research (ITER), etc. Your video helps me a lot. This is how one can encourage the students to get the general idea quickly, then learn more and excel in their fields. Thanks, Lesics !

  • @iamgreatalwaysgreat8209

    @iamgreatalwaysgreat8209

    Жыл бұрын

    Good sir, i am going to pursue nuclear engineering in future. May you provide me some advice?

  • @00crashtest

    @00crashtest

    Жыл бұрын

    They probably didn't use thorium for power stations because it requires entirety of it to be new R&D, which costs at least tens of billions of dollars, if not hundreds. With uranium, the R&D was already done for them because they are piggybacking off of the research done for military weaponry.

  • @HolahkuTaigiTWFormosanDiplomat
    @HolahkuTaigiTWFormosanDiplomat Жыл бұрын

    This my first time known that you don't need isotope to have chain reaction but only with the probability issue, same as the thing that I found the household microwave oven isn't provide the best frequency or wavelength for the water and so on molecules.

  • @JaxGreen
    @JaxGreen Жыл бұрын

    I asked my teacher this question when I was 15 years old in 2021. Now I have learnt the truth of fission

  • @laodemuhamadirfanipang6115
    @laodemuhamadirfanipang6115 Жыл бұрын

    Dear chanel lesics, please make a video about how the hydraulic press works I would like to know from you who has a simple explanation method, and easy to understand  Please

  • @lmripper3659

    @lmripper3659

    Жыл бұрын

    Oh,that's actually pretty easy. It's like a syringe.You pull in hydraulic oil with it and once pressed out it goes thru a smaller diameter pipe which by the law of physics has increased pressure. To understand it easier take a sharp needle and blunt needle,if you try to penetrate something ofc you'd be penetrated by the sharp one because it has more pressure focused into a smaller area. That's how they work as well,you take a big metal cylinder that can hold lots of pressure and you add inside a hydraulic oil which is low in viscosity but veeery dense,you pump the bigger cyilinder and it pushes everything into a smaller one out which then you work with(bending or whatever you need a press for) To push the handle which moves the liquid around it's usually made with leverage by the same principle i explained before or an electro motor which pumps it. Hope i got it right,correct me if there's a guy who understands them a lot.

  • @marvelousfeast936
    @marvelousfeast936 Жыл бұрын

    Nice

  • @doggonemess1
    @doggonemess1 Жыл бұрын

    5:50 Of the 64 kilograms, only about 1 kilo actually fissioned. The rest blew apart and turned into fallout.

  • @ibnewton8951

    @ibnewton8951

    Жыл бұрын

    How do we know this?

  • @doggonemess1

    @doggonemess1

    Жыл бұрын

    @@ibnewton8951 The scientists based it on the explosive yield. The estimated 15 kt explosion equates to 1 kg of matter converted into energy. As the blast damage from the chemical explosives would be negligible, the blast therefore was caused by the conversion of mass into energy. Einstein was nice enough to provide us with the math on that one. :) EDIT: I goofed, see my follow up comment. I'm leaving this one because I'll admit when I'm wrong about something.

  • @doggonemess1

    @doggonemess1

    Жыл бұрын

    Argh, I misquoted. The energy release was from fission byproducts, not the conversion of mass into energy. 1 kg of mass converted directly into energy would yield over 20 megatons of blast. The amount of mass converted into energy in Little Boy was about 1 GRAM.

  • @dy7296

    @dy7296

    Жыл бұрын

    @@doggonemess1 And that's a perfect prespective of how insanely inefficient is the reactions we use on the living on converting the mass into energy. A combustion of Hydrogen & Oxygen to make water, which is practically one of the cleanest one, converts 0.000000001% of mass into heat energy. The Fission of Uranium converts 0.08%. The Fusion of Hydrogen to Helium converts 0.7%. source by minutesphysics.

  • @doggonemess1

    @doggonemess1

    Жыл бұрын

    @@dy7296 We need some antimatter reactors. Get that rate up to 100%. XD

  • @amalkattanam7566
    @amalkattanam7566 Жыл бұрын

    Can you make a video on extraction and features of virbranium metal 🙂

  • @krishnar754
    @krishnar754 Жыл бұрын

    Hi team Lesics, your videos are awesome. Really appreciate your efforts. I think if you end the videos in a better way it will be even more better is what I feel. I'm in no way saying your videos are bad, just if the endings can be a bit smoother it'll make tremendous difference. I hope this comment finds you. Love from Bangalore,INDIA ❤️👏

  • @EXPERTSHARMA-ly8xq

    @EXPERTSHARMA-ly8xq

    Жыл бұрын

    Not from bangalore This is from INDIA 😊😊

  • @arunkumarae513
    @arunkumarae513 Жыл бұрын

    ನಮಸ್ತೆ... ಪರಮಾಣು ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಮಾಹಿತಿ ನೀಡಿದಕೆ ಧನ್ಯವಾದಗಳು ಸರ್ 🙏........

  • @shravankadu2386
    @shravankadu2386 Жыл бұрын

    Please upload next video on fusion energy.

  • @srinivasulunaik6519
    @srinivasulunaik6519 Жыл бұрын

    Thronium also one the nuclear fuel. it produce electricity moderately and also few neutrons released in fission reaction.

  • @dcdesigns9256
    @dcdesigns9256 Жыл бұрын

    Can you pls make video on leaning of three wheeler like toyota i ride and other 3 wheel vehicle which tilt with wheel

  • @sethapex9670
    @sethapex9670 Жыл бұрын

    Natural uranium can be used as fuel in a CANDU style reactor which uses heavy water as a moderator due to the high neutron economy of heavy water.

  • @farqilion8747

    @farqilion8747

    Жыл бұрын

    Isn't that also because of heavy water has relatively high (gamma, n) reaction cross-section?

  • @sethapex9670

    @sethapex9670

    Жыл бұрын

    @@farqilion8747 I think you mean it has a low reaction cross-section. Protium has a high affinity for neutrons because it already has an unpaired proton, but the deuterium nucleus is already balanced. So fast neutrons from the reactions collide but do not get absorbed easily and instead transfer energy to the deuterium as heat, and the neutrons themselves are quickly slowed to the thermal range where they can be more easily captured by a uranium or plutonium nucleus, and cause fertilization or fission, depending on the element and isotope.

  • @farqilion8747

    @farqilion8747

    Жыл бұрын

    @@sethapex9670 Sure heavy water absorbs significantly less neutrons than regular one does. But what I meant is that cross-section for *(gamma, n)* (i.e. presence of photoneutrons in the core due to deuterium nuclei splitting by gamma rays generated by some of the fission products) is relatively high. And considering a relatively large amounts of heavy water in CANDU reactors, amount of additional neutrons is quite significant

  • @sethapex9670

    @sethapex9670

    Жыл бұрын

    @@farqilion8747 I've not heard of photoneutrons before now, but I just looked into it and I suppose it makes sense that that may be likely. The energy of those gamma photons would have to be pretty high though, since they're essentially causing fission in an element that should pretty much only be energetically capable of fusion and decay

  • @julianshepherd2038
    @julianshepherd2038 Жыл бұрын

    50 years ago I was a big fan but the endless promises of safety, price and time to build have changed my mind. Oh yeah, cleaning up costs and wast storage ain't sorted.

  • @mayormusic972
    @mayormusic972 Жыл бұрын

    please for the Lesics team, I want an explanation about the earth nail hammer / pier in Indonesian, please do it as soon as possible 🙏🙏.. I'll be waiting 😁😁 thank you,,,Greetings from Indonesia🇲🇨

  • @k-notbroke
    @k-notbroke Жыл бұрын

    Once I see a notification I know it's time for brains

  • @grubyjanusz4517
    @grubyjanusz4517 Жыл бұрын

    What happened to the spot video, will it ever be made public?

  • @KingJulienPlay
    @KingJulienPlay Жыл бұрын

    good video, but still left Thorium very shallow. Why are there political problems if it has more advantages?

  • @FrankPCarpi
    @FrankPCarpi Жыл бұрын

    Since the neutron is s neutral charge, how do you accelerate it?

  • @littleshopofelectrons4014
    @littleshopofelectrons4014 Жыл бұрын

    "Mr. Albert Einstein" should be "Dr. Albert Einstein". Give him his due.

  • @ThugByChoice
    @ThugByChoice Жыл бұрын

    That walk when he rushed to the lab though 😅

  • @sharifsk5706
    @sharifsk5706 Жыл бұрын

    Please make a video on Noise cancellation in microphone 👍

  • @chimpinabowtie6913
    @chimpinabowtie6913 Жыл бұрын

    7:20 "You can't make bombs from it" There, fixed it.

  • @julianshepherd2038

    @julianshepherd2038

    Жыл бұрын

    dirty bombs

  • @dy7296

    @dy7296

    Жыл бұрын

    "Did you think every war in history was all part of some big old conspiracy? Bullsh!t. War is just a part of who we are" - Sundowner

  • @EXPERTSHARMA-ly8xq
    @EXPERTSHARMA-ly8xq Жыл бұрын

    I want to be a member of lesics team But i have not much more money for joining . Give me some ideas to how make videos on educational topics and also how to make video.And from which application. Thank you Respected sir

  • @suhrid694
    @suhrid694 Жыл бұрын

    Please make a video about Padma Bridge in Bangladesh.

  • @Modjaidcarcareservices
    @Modjaidcarcareservices Жыл бұрын

    Good wark

  • @qpwoeiruty108
    @qpwoeiruty108 Жыл бұрын

    we've all heard about Einstein, Oppenheimer. but i've never heard about Enrico Fermi, the real dude in my opinion

  • @official-obama
    @official-obama Жыл бұрын

    einstein: _running_ fermi's gotta be doing something, right?! i need to weigh his samples!

  • @parcialis
    @parcialis Жыл бұрын

    3:32 you said "atoms are mostly made up of hollow space". It is incorrect to state that. The electron cloud is spread out over a large volume, with the highest probability of finding electrons near the nucleus and a lower probability of finding electrons further away from the nucleus. This results in the appearance of empty space within the atom. So while atoms do contain a significant amount of empty space, it is not accurate to say that they are "mostly made up of hollow space". :D

  • @Kaslabarak
    @Kaslabarak Жыл бұрын

    so the thorium guy couple year ago was right nice to know.

  • @dvkomsk
    @dvkomsk Жыл бұрын

    The US planes that dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (5:40) are drawn incorrectly: the stars on the wings should be white. Red stars were on the wings of Soviet aircraft.

  • @andrejrockshox
    @andrejrockshox Жыл бұрын

    did i miss something? wich part of the mass converts to energy?

  • @amitzerikunthe7635
    @amitzerikunthe7635 Жыл бұрын

    ❤️

  • @vernonbrechin4207
    @vernonbrechin4207 Жыл бұрын

    A fan club, advocating for the use of thorium fueled reactors, began almost 20 years ago. It continues despite almost no interest from the government and private sectors. The fans are either clueless regarding this failure, or they believe this aspect should not be mentioned in their promotional pitches. The vast majority immerse themselves in eco-chamber groups where they can reinforce their love affair with this technology. Few have any interest in critical analysis such as looking into criticisms of the technology. Here are a couple of titles worth searching for. Thorium, Not The Nuclear Savior Claimed Thorium Fuel - No Panacea for Nuclear Power Many technology lovers often view nuclear energy as being a savior to deal with climate change issues. Unfortunately they tend to also be stuck with the view that we have 20-30 years to turn things around to the point where nuclear power can replace all our carbon emitting fossil fuel energy sources, including for mobile sources such as cars, buses, trucks, trains, ships and a slew of aircraft. These dreamers have become masters at excluding the following warnings from their consciousness. UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) (Statement made over four years ago) IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) One of the many waste products of the typical nuclear fusion process is the radioactive isotope plutonium-239 which has a half-life of a bit over 24,000 years which means particles of it remain a potential hazard for about a half-million years. In the U.S. creators of Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) waste were promised, in the 1950s, the creation of a deep geological repository. Seventy years later no such repository is on the horizon. The production of power has always taken priority and no one has been held accountable for the final waste disposal failure. A similar situation exist for all other countries that generate nuclear power since none of them yet has an operating deep geological repository.

  • @sangeetakaushik2155
    @sangeetakaushik2155 Жыл бұрын

    I have to make it so it want to know that in which shape you have heated it in its original shape

  • @stanikzai4677
    @stanikzai46773 ай бұрын

    I have a question if any one could help me with the answer: When the fuel rods are placed with Uranium in a power planet, how we introduce the neutron? the rods are sealed does it works with electric shock, or giving it heat? or how?

  • @Tuffaha
    @Tuffaha Жыл бұрын

    How can a charge-leds particle like neutron be accelerated to hit a nucleus?

  • @cristofermartinez2118
    @cristofermartinez2118 Жыл бұрын

    Finally going back to the good quality of content, before that guy decided he had to be in every video

  • @mdkamrulislam7610
    @mdkamrulislam7610 Жыл бұрын

    1 st view 🥰😍

  • @BackYardScience2000

    @BackYardScience2000

    Жыл бұрын

    Not actually. Probably 7th or 8th.

  • @0neIntangible

    @0neIntangible

    Жыл бұрын

    Q; What's the definition of a true competitor? A: Someone who comes first and third in a jerk-off contest.

  • @monsterbeast8195
    @monsterbeast8195 Жыл бұрын

    why is boston dynamics video deleted?

  • @awaresoul1389
    @awaresoul1389 Жыл бұрын

    L for Lesics, L for Love.

  • @dans-designs
    @dans-designs Жыл бұрын

    Great video but i felt it ended abit suddenly, It would have been nice to wrap up with the explanation of WHY thorium is not currently viable...

  • @PankajKumar-hf8in
    @PankajKumar-hf8in Жыл бұрын

    element ke molecular structure ke bare me 3d animation me bataye

  • @forestrf
    @forestrf Жыл бұрын

    Only 200 years! I expected way more t.t

  • @rohitdalvi9361
    @rohitdalvi9361 Жыл бұрын

    The rushing part was more interesting 2:34

  • @raloed.363
    @raloed.363 Жыл бұрын

    That Einstein is gonna give me nightmares

  • @kitezopo2593
    @kitezopo2593 Жыл бұрын

    I hate chemistry class during my high school 5 years ago, too bad that I only now realized how significant it is.

  • @Chappy141
    @Chappy141 Жыл бұрын

    In my humble opinion if we didn’t have as much political involvement in our electrical grid the US would have already been way on its way to become one of the largest countries to pursue full nuclear energy. Just My Opinion 😊

  • @sethapex9670
    @sethapex9670 Жыл бұрын

    "political and economic reasons" being that nobody has yet asserted the political will to do it.

  • @josephjeno6709
    @josephjeno6709 Жыл бұрын

    Let explain how fussion makes

  • @alexwhite8885
    @alexwhite8885 Жыл бұрын

    5:42 Soviet !!! fighter drops atomic bomb on Hiroshima

  • @grndhg86d
    @grndhg86d Жыл бұрын

    Couldn't the "waste" be enriched for a lesser use such as submarine or ship reactor fuel? Or perhaps a heating source for polar weather stations and hotels?

  • @bepisbepi

    @bepisbepi

    Жыл бұрын

    we've been doing this for 20 years but people still think we never thought about it.

  • @mihirchandran
    @mihirchandran Жыл бұрын

    This video didn't talk about how fusion (thermonuclear) reactions work.

  • @mlbb_play6565
    @mlbb_play6565 Жыл бұрын

    Hello my name's OUN. I'm from CAMBODIA I'm really love your Content. But people in my country can't understand English,So I want to translate to language (Khmer). Could I translate your video to my Chanel?❤️

  • @XrSamal
    @XrSamal Жыл бұрын