On my channel you will find an in-depth analysis of my favorite classic chess games. Classic games are much more instructive than the modern ones, as it is much easier to follow the strategic plans and their gradual implementation. Modern top-level grandmasters make much less mistakes than their predecessors, know everything about their opponent’s strategic plans and typical tactics and prevent these plans from being implemented, while the lower-rated viewers have no clue about these plans, as all these strategic and tactical ideas stay behind the scenes. Thus, chess classics is essential for anyone who wants to get a deep understanding of positional chess, strategy, tactics, develop intuitive thinking and recognize typical strategic and tactical patterns. Classic games are a treasure house of the deepest chess wisdom and by studying them you will also develop a better understanding of the modern high-level chess.
Пікірлер
Thanks for the great presentation! Amazing how Bc8 and Ra8 remained undeveloped.
Who is the engine?
Save button not working ???
As far as I know, it works.
Why not just show the game, for any sake!
Over a hundred years old…amazing calculation from both! Love Nim!
One day ill make “computer” resign 🎉
this all started because of 9. Nd2 if he did that 9. e4 it would be ok. OR better after 3.Nc3 Bb4, 4. Qc2 d5 5. a3 Bxc3 6. Qc3 ...
Why did bishop from e8 choose to go to d7 instead of going to f7or even for or first g7. Also it the black win if Q moved a d8 instead of c3.
Fine!
8:22 white to move. Pawn to B5?
Here is what Tal writes about 19 b5: "... the move 19 b5 is not dangerous, as Black gets a positional advantage after 19 ... Ne5 20 bxc6 Nxd3 21cxb7 Rb8. I intended to take up a strong position on c4 with the knight, because my opponent had weakened this square with his incautious 14th move" The engine evaluates this position as equal though.
Great game!!! Thank you.
My pleasure.
In these king's gambit positions you have to play very ressourceful and precise to not fall behind. You can't play with direct tactical threats the whole game. For example Bronstein recognized that he had time to twice change the position of his white-squared bishop. And in other positions he knew that it's time for very difficult precise moves. Fantastic timing and understandig. I admire Bronstein. It would be a dream to play a game like this.
1991 haha that chess program was probably 2100 rating. Wait another 10 years and then see if he could beat a chess engine on highest level. Deep Blue was rated around 2800 give or take then latest stockfish is 3600 something.
Certainly better than 2100.
@@dannygjk wikipedia says that engine "reached a max rating of 2325". Now, not sure if that means after more years of tweaking or in 1991. But okay, 2325 is prob GM level back then. I don't know but one thing I do know is that he wouldn't crush Stockfish today - artistically or otherwise. :)
@@TruthSurge 2325 is IM level (if 2325 Elo).
@@dannygjk okay. But 2325 in 1991 might be 2500 today. No? I don't know. Just saying that beating a chess algorithm in 1991 wasn't a shocking thing. Beating Stockfish on highest level WOULD BE a shocking thing. That's all I'm saying.
@@TruthSurge The inflation hasn't been that high but true it is significant especially since Arpad Elo stepped down as administrator.
Oh the age when engines could still lose to humans, nowadays anyone with a smartphone and no moral compass can beat Magnus
Just lower the ranking. Its perfectly enjoyable if you place it on reasonable elo
And he called the opponent "iron idiot" after the game. Or it was another game? Pretty sure it was Bronstein vs some computer.
I hate computer chess to no end, kudos to Bronstein!
What's wrong with computer chess?
@@aqswd6825 I mainly hate the influence engines have had on human chessplay. Games have become more centered around opening theory than actual planning and strategy. You have to learn variations that can be over 40 moves, such as in complex openings like the Poisoned Pawn variation of the Sicilian Najdorf. There are actual drawing lines now, constructed not through human ingenuity and experimentation, but raw, soulless computer analysis. Players don’t lean into individual play styles anymore because they always want to emulate computers. I despise computer chess because of what it has done to human chess.
How nice, I have the Pre designed predecessor of this chipset from 1987 in the super nine high fidelity chess engine
Wow, what the heck was that !!!!
Prodigious !
it's bronstein the machine !!
Incredible insight into to exactly what is happening at all times.
Clickbait -- more like one the most boring games.
Way too wordy and boring, even at 1.75x speed. Quit over-explaining the obvious. Pick your spots. This gets tedious fast.
What a game! Thanks.
My pleasure.
The King Alekhine, great chess players allí time.
The greatest victory of a human against a computer is fools-mating martin in 4
Great game! Brave choice by DB to play the KG! 👏👏
What a beautiful game! Thanks for it!
My pleasure!
your explanations are top notch, I used to subscribed to many chess channels, maybe still are, but you are easily the most educative.
How good was Fidelity at the time?
In 1991 probably IM strength.
@@dannygjk ok, thanks.
Excellent content. Please keep going!
wow what a game !!
Kh1 !!
The Bishop on C6 restricting White’s knight and also threatening pawn on A4 tying up White’s king on its defence is a stroke of genius by Tal.
I like his style, legendary
I love Chigorin's games, because I can actually understand some of them, and they are beautiful. If I had one "chess wish" it would be for two informal games between Chigorin and Fisher p;aying both sides of the Evans.
Crisp, clean, transcendental display of ability By Bob Bobby Fischer. Truly a game for the ages.
Русский акцент обязателен при рассказе о шахматах
Or poverty!
Chess wisdom is bedst by test !
You do excellent work …
19:33 the big volcano eruption starts here. 21:45 the queen sacrifice. Note that I understand the importance of how the game arrives to this position but it is convenient to know when the sacrifice itself happens.
Beautiful game by keres and you explained this game really well as usual ❤️.
Great game by Reshevsky, but a rather poor one by Capablanca: did he underestimate Reshevsky? As Tarrasch seems to have pointed out: it is not enough to be a good player, you also have to play well.
.
.
A magnificent game which takes me back too many years. Thanks for your excellent analysis.
My pleasure.
Wow... Just wow! fireworks from such a dry position. Thank you 🙏👌
My pleasure.
Well explained 👏
Could you please make a video of nowadays GMs game like Magnus Carlson Fabi Caruana or anyone
Nooooooooo
toooooooooooooooooooooooo longggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg