Пікірлер

• 
  @ScottRagland2 сағат бұрын

  your wholly irrelevant anti-Trump editorial snark just lost you this user.

• 
  @salman568910 сағат бұрын

  Russian Father of all bombs is more powerful

• 
  @trogdortheburninator814912 сағат бұрын

  Makes you realise how crazy powerful nuclear weapons are

• 
  @leedexКүн бұрын

  Let’s see Russian’s Father of all bomb in action.

• 
  @nunyabeeswax26382 күн бұрын

  You never know if / when you will have to drop a really big non-nuclear explosive on top of something. And the us military thought we might need something like that. Not THAT big of a deal.

• 
  @johnnotorfrancesco17043 күн бұрын

  I for one am glad that , that “someone in the White House “ who was offended will be back,, and let’s not confuse offendedness with intimidation, we had zero wars started, and it was possibly because the flex of a single MOAB detonation on terrorists. The message was clear then , as is the message of the current “someone “, though the clear messages are completely opposite. With Russia now declaring the US as an enemy, Hamas, Iran , The Hoothies, and countries like Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen taking shots at American bases and ships with little to no response, we’ve got a responsibility to Israel, weather you like it or not,, and looming in the near future got China about to pounce on Taiwan . Seems to me doing nothing,, oh except fund Ukraine , about these current wars is the most irresponsible thing to show the world. We need a POTUS with balls that can and will complete a sentence and put the exclamation point at the end of it.

• 
  @welkijken3 күн бұрын

  So how does this compare to thermobaric munitions? Are the ratio's simular? if not, why not just make a thermo the size of this one? guess its equally redundant and a waste of resources

• 
  @balrajpradhan98813 күн бұрын

  WOW UNCLE. IT'S AWESOME.

• 
  @breakthesystem61984 күн бұрын

  Israel's finding them useful against civilians

• 
  @sunny-sq6ci5 күн бұрын

  the point of it was not a practical or tactical reason but rather a straight up psychological. it was a demo to everyone, 'fuc around and find out'

• 
  @lonerider69516 күн бұрын

  Hope its never used just like the subs it replaced.

• 
  @brianbelton36056 күн бұрын

  We cannot do this to each other We are all family. Look at the “earth-rise” photo of our planet, from a great distance. We, and our earth, appear very small and delicate. Let’s preserve this vision. Our lives depend on it

• 
  @utubeo4r7 күн бұрын

  Because the French still have colonies in Africa! So they still want to project their airpower in Africa.

• 
  @bobbykaralfa7 күн бұрын

  not a useless weapon thankfully only used one. and was never had a range of meters not 15; are in stock and one used in combat

• 
  @titititas94858 күн бұрын

  The French military is built to do safari in Africa. They need air cover. Macron said hes going to send French troops to Ukraine, to hunt gazelles & zebras. Delusional he is.

• 
  @lechatethere77109 күн бұрын

  le " clemenssou "

• 
  @guillaumefigarella17045 күн бұрын

  j'ai égallement ri

• 
  @quentin68939 күн бұрын

  Second ZEE in the world is pretty self explanatory

• 
  @joosiekawk9 күн бұрын

  this is one ugly ass looking dilapidated junk carrier. Made in France

• 
  @muzomuzo90510 күн бұрын

  Parce que si les autres se contentent de "merde" , nous on veut et on sait faire le "mieux" j'espère juste que le prochain ne s'appellera pas "Macrotte"

• 
  @pinkunicorn337310 күн бұрын

  Obviously, anti-French comments, against France are in order with this video as they are every time the Anglo-Saxons approach this subject. I would only have one thing to say. Leave France and the French alone rather than talking bullshit about them. You will not come across as idiots and uneducated.

• 
  @olivierrocat393210 күн бұрын

  And the worst part of all this is that to conform the American fighters and the Rafale, they make them do a whole battery of tests, to ensure that they can take off from their aircraft carriers with their springboard... 😂

• 
  @precioushidalgo12411 күн бұрын

  Grandmother of all grandmother

• 
  @QuicksilverVM13 күн бұрын

  i didnt see the mother of all bombs the tzar bomb....

• 
  @earlcedrickybobadili305013 күн бұрын

  IJN is back, I could feel it

• 
  @williambilltran352813 күн бұрын

  have a nice day and God bless French! June 2nd, 2024 Blessings in Christ, Sincerely,

• 
  @undertaker21-1814 күн бұрын

  Russian Crap

• 
  @Turf-yj9ei15 күн бұрын

  Nobody needs one. The question is do you want to project power badly enough to pay for one

• 
  @olivierrocat393210 күн бұрын

  That's why China is bulding 2 of them... Useless? Your comment, YES.

• 
  @michaelmccarthy941117 күн бұрын

  Why didn't you learn how to pronounce Clemenceau before producing this story?

• 
  @michaelh49417 күн бұрын

  France had 2 aircraft carriers up to 2000, the Clemenceau & Foch. Replaced by Charles de Gaulle. A second sister nuclear carrier was planned but never built & even a second “conventional” carrier was looked into but never built to complement the Charles de Gaulle.

• 
  @Smashingnews18 күн бұрын

  How many years did they took to built this?

• 
  @Nightwing0101019 күн бұрын

  Didn't one of these end the first Gulf War.

• 
  @JoeyRay-fz1qe19 күн бұрын

  France still thinks they are a world power but they are now losing their neo-colonies. They lost a bunch in West Africa that they can't rob the countries of is natural resource and its people. New Caledonia is demanding they leave so maybe in the Pacific Region will start doing it. As they lose their neo-colonies less money will be going into their coffers which mean less they can afford!

• 
  @lancewood141019 күн бұрын

  French renaissance relic hahahaha

• 
  @user-qy1eb1yj4w20 күн бұрын

  Outch shitp

• 
  @squirepraggerstope359120 күн бұрын

  Just France's anti-Anglosphere fantasy delusion of still being a great power and NATO's allegedly main land power, yet which prefers to swan around the Indo-Pacific in its wonky little carrier. Or, until recently, send its now 100% wheeled AFVs to the Sahel (for which they're suited) while simultaneously neglecting its European land responsibilities (for which they're not!). ALL while squeaking at Britain to deploy more to Europe instead. Despite Britain's own defence needing primarily more naval and air capacity!

• 
  @guillaumefigarella170417 күн бұрын

  why so much salt? what do you mean "still being a great power"? do you think thats what anyone think? land power too isnt that a bit of an overstatement or has france turned into poland while i wasn't looking? total 2019 estimate for the population of the british oversea territory is 272,256 people, the french oversea territory's population in 2024 is more than 2.8 millions people which i think warrant at least a single lone carrier and three amphibious assault ship without f*cking invoking allegations of "fantasy delusion of still being a great power" ? also "anti anglosphere fantasy"? de gaulle has been dead for 50+ years, or is about the anti trump sentiment? also, wonky little carriers? are we comparing size? how old are you seriously? is that what you consider a good argument compared to those two huge barren desert wasteland of a flight deck that the QE class are right now? why do you hate wheels too? Did you know that on french speaking defense stuff people say we should work with the brits more often, we share a lot more military culture compared to the germans, that we should have looked into getting QE class with catapult in the 2010s instead of waiting for the PANG, that the CTAS program was a great success, peoples wish there was more commonality on the future anti ship/future cruise missile program like we did for storm shadow/scalp instead of two different design, people saying we should have worked with the brits on the next gen fighter program instead of the germans yet every time there is a video on anything french in english, there is always an angry brit acting like france is the scourge of europe and everything bad happening to the british military is france not doing enough/doing too much/not doing what you want?

• 
  @squirepraggerstope359116 күн бұрын

  @@guillaumefigarella1704 Mere excuses for France's (as I said) continuing post-imperial great power fantasy. In essence pursued via ongoing assertion of the originally Gaullist conception, "strategic autonomy" (formulated decades ago post-Suez by, as you say, the now long dead de Gaulle. Yet which in its latest form is now being squeaked out by the rat, Macron). Typically via leveraging the loathsome EU central institution's backing and that, in turn, by continuing to play assiduously, France's role as Germany's faithful "Mini-Me". While as for your remaining specific points, surely you can't expect a history-conscious Brit, of all people (or yet more germanely for other reasons, most citizens of continental NATO allies) to be impressed by your irrelevant drivel anent France's insistence on retaining a very few pocket sized colonies with a still very small total population? Still less by you seeking to use the matter as you seemingly are, as spurious justification for maintaining France's not-very-capable-yet-STILL-bigger-than-it-should-be-navy at a size significantly too large relative to the now hugely hollowed-out French land-forces? Which should be YOUR nation's first priority as t.b.h. most Poles would very likely also tell you! On which score, the replacement of the pint-sized but still far too costly CdeG by the larger, more capable but thus yet more costly projected PANG, only adds to the problem. As does the replacement of ALL tracked French AFVs by their (for most EUROPEAN deployments) enormously less capable wheeled alternatives. Merely to facilitate low cost deployments to out-of-NATO-theatres! While re CTAS, or PAAMS, or any other defence related programme you may cite, genuine British patriots would be insane to accede again to ANY repetition of ANY such international collaboration whatsoever that again includes France. Especially not the UK/Italy/Japan FCAS project, which France should NEVER be allowed to join ... and NOT because France is "the scourge of Europe". She's no such thing! Rather, because France has been far too successful for far too long at steering... 1) -the EU states, primarily Germany, into positions that are fundamentally inimical to the global Anglosphere's interests generally. 2) -our repugnant UK Metro-trash haute-bourgeois establishment elites into repeatedly aping Euro-centric perspectives, over the whole of the preceding 120 years! All of which has been, still is and would again in future be to the gross detriment of THIS nation and People's real interests. Which as the majority of our population's basically quite shrewd geopolitical outlook testifies, are best served by first and foremost ensuring our close alignment WITH the other Anglosphere nations. The three other CANZUK powers first of all.

• 
  @athrunzala677011 күн бұрын

  given the problems your Royal Navy is encountering... in your place I wouldn't be too smart... especially since France protects part of your maritime territory lol

• 
  @squirepraggerstope359111 күн бұрын

  @@athrunzala6770 Bless! Which bit? Pitcairn?🤣🤣

• 
  @squirepraggerstope359111 күн бұрын

  @@guillaumefigarella1704 By all means come back if ever you learn anything about the topics you've addressed.

• 
  @Americaone121 күн бұрын

  France has always been a world power👍👍👍👍

• 
  @feliscorax4 күн бұрын

  Hold on a minute - not always. There’s that period between 1940 and 1944, which understandably the French themselves are reluctant to talk about, when France not only ceased to be a world power but ceased being an independent and sovereign country altogether.

• 
  @cx3929Күн бұрын

  "World power" who surrendered

• 
  @etrangeetranger7729Күн бұрын

  @@cx3929 Just like your mom

• 
  @cx3929Күн бұрын

  @@etrangeetranger7729 Fact - Salty Frenchie whose grandparents surrendered without a real fight. Most countries at least fought till their country was completely overran but France just surrendered. Even today, France depends on the french foreign legion to fight for your wars and keep your peace while France today has been overran by immigrants making even Paris unsafe.

• 
  @clifflong794421 күн бұрын

  Bout time the most powerful European ally was able to project power….

• 
  @guillaumefigarella170417 күн бұрын

  what do you mean it has always been a power projection military for like the last few centuries?

• 
  @clifflong794417 күн бұрын

  @@guillaumefigarella1704 To really project power you have to own the sky. Infantry clears ground but if the enemy has air superiority they are basically hamburger. Carriers allow that to happen.

• 
  @guillaumefigarella170417 күн бұрын

  @@clifflong7944 hum very long post sorry, so while the french military is not at all on the level of the us military, its just not comparable we can't afford the scale to power project hundreds of thousands of troops, immense cargo airplane fleet, immense lhd fleet, just immense amount of everything, id still argue that france has the best power projection of europe, take the de gaulle its escort one or two attack subs the mistral lhd, the large cargo airplane and refuelling fleet, and you have what the american would probably call the bare minimum of power projection, remove an enemy fleet with extreme prejudice with the nuclear subs, deploy fixed wing aircraft at sea, drop a few thousands troops and equipment, those are pretty uncommon capability in general so in a 300 000 personnel military with an average military spending for 2000-2020 of around 40 billions euros its pretty good

• 
  @squirepraggerstope359116 күн бұрын

  @@guillaumefigarella1704 In truth, France is likely still NOT the most capable European state re maritime or limited amphibious power projection. Though as I told you above, in point of fact it shouldn't be nearly so capable in those roles even as it currently is.

• 
  @Arleq111 күн бұрын

  ​@@squirepraggerstope3591and who is?

• 
  @grahammitchell852422 күн бұрын

  I bet it has more reverse gears than forward.

• 
  @DrugsBunny97321 күн бұрын

  Lame guy....

• 
  @dominique470020 күн бұрын

  like you in Korea, Vietnam and Afghanistan leaving your weapons, well done and next time you will shut your mouth

• 
  @Rafale0110 күн бұрын

  Dumb american right ?

• 
  @KillBones9 күн бұрын

  2002 need her joke to come back

• 
  @footloose118722 күн бұрын

  Germany took over France in 6 weeks! It shows how powerful the French were!!! 🤣🤣🤣 Free New Caledonia!!!!!!

• 
  @hangar187321 күн бұрын

  Well... usual stupid statement based on a situation more than 80 years ago. On the other hand you could remember french took Berlin in less than 19 days 2 centuries ago... Free California!!!

• 
  @ms-lazuli743521 күн бұрын

  Did you know that France is the country with the most military victories in the world? The British are just behind, followed by the United States. Free world.

• 
  @philbd327514 күн бұрын

  free from who?

• 
  @vermicelledecheval521913 күн бұрын

  Why don't you shut up ? And open some history books ? Might learn something...

• 
  @Pakal7711 күн бұрын

  You are stuck in 1940 vs 2 Milleniums of French history. Grow up man.

• 
  @gcarter197322 күн бұрын

  Why does US need 12?

• 
  @vinny711422 күн бұрын

  Cause we are stupid and our people are fearing mongering morons, even tho 70% of our population can barely survive and earn the bare minimum and yet we vote ( I don't ) for people who choose to fund this bloated military and Pentagon can't even pass an audit, they dump and waste things just so their budget isn't cut and people are okay with, we don't have access to healthcare, education is merely ok, our infrastructure is breaking in front of our eyes, the rich keeps getting tax break while not paying for anything but hey at least we have cool death machines.

• 
  @ljkking62221 күн бұрын

  We have 20 but only 12 super carriers. The others are more amphibious carriers. You typically only have 50% of them available at anytime but if it was war time conditions I’m sure that could be raised significantly. As to the why. I love the fact we have a large and imposing military that’s peace thru strength but I hate we are the worlds police. We need to worry about ourselves more. A homeless guy sleeping on the street doesn’t give a f about how big your aircraft carrier is. Sad but true

• 
  @davidporter705120 күн бұрын

  It's called trade.

• 
  @gcarter197320 күн бұрын

  @@davidporter7051 every country trades.

• 
  @davidporter705120 күн бұрын

  @@gcarter1973 and if you can't put two and two together you shouldn't ask the question. Because America doesn't produce anything near the quantity it did to become the World's most powerful economy it must use its military to dictate the most favorable agreements. If the United States did produce more it would need the same military to ensure it's goods are traded once again with the most favorable agreements. The allies are allies with the United States and part of this agreement is they will fall under the umbrella of the United States and this includes protection from the United States.

• 
  @bacon8123 күн бұрын

  Exactly why do the French need any weapons at all? All they are going to do is surrender anyway 🧐

• 
  @justinmickatavage783823 күн бұрын

  France needs to show the world they can produce military equipment... so they can sell more of it..

• 
  @ludovic74398 күн бұрын

  And....USA ?....

• 
  @musa701023 күн бұрын

  Mercenary.... Earning $ on peace keeping duty 😂

• 
  @tsclly237723 күн бұрын

  Well, yes and they are Russian (and if you are Russian, not to be commented on - without permission). But maybe you can go back in time and comment on the Soviet bombs, like the concrete bombs..

• 
  @NicoMCH66623 күн бұрын

  A key point to why it is needed and why there will also be the PANG (the future aircraft carrier) is that the CDG is also part of France's nuclear deterrence program.

• 
  @valfar20153 күн бұрын

  Yes not to forget that the french aircraft carrrier always have at least 10 300kt nuclear Warhead to be launch at any time

• 
  @eduardoquirino813123 күн бұрын

  Build your mighty carrier!

• 
  @elijahwakati863923 күн бұрын

  To Show off

• 
  @user-js9qf2bc1x23 күн бұрын

  France needs it because they can!

• 
  @cheukshunyue791624 күн бұрын

  ON9, Stupid Sheep Ships!😮😢😅

• 
  @andyhughes177624 күн бұрын

  The French needs aircraft carrier to help the West keep its imperial power of exploiting their colonies around the world. Colonialism is still alive and well but under the disguise of spreading democracy.

• 
  @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi372324 күн бұрын

  Because the north of Mediterean Sea seems ripe for re-expansion