Mental giant, moral fool. I can still see him singing with Hugo Chavez before the demise of Venezuela. After the demise was well underway, Noam tried to back pedal with the typical "nobody ever does socialism right" lame excuse. PS_ I adore the comments...I haven't seen this much fawning since Bambi was released by Walt Disney studious in 1942.
@simo5612 күн бұрын
الملحون فن مغربي عريق بدايته كانت في العصر الموحدي في القرن 12
@czarquetzal83444 ай бұрын
I like the philosophical foundation of his linguistics - Essentialism. It retains something that cannot be fully grasped by empirical science
@markdavid12084 ай бұрын
Nice to hear the late Jim McCawley get a couple shoutouts.
@carlitosgl5 ай бұрын
without exception, except for head movement 🤪25:03
@AsEnIxX-wtf7 ай бұрын
Thanks for uploading the two lectures.
@user-tx6et2nu5e8 ай бұрын
That Wink....
@user-mq1gm9gm7v9 ай бұрын
wow! a legend!
@Josephus_vanDenElzen9 ай бұрын
1:50 Galileo 2:08 How is it possible to express an inffinite number of ideas with a couple of dozens sounds, which in itself have nothing in common with the thoughts in our minds and allow us to understand what is not present in consicousness? That's indeed an interesting question. But, doesn't he goes too far with 3:06 "everything we can conceive and the most diverse movements of our soul" Some experiences are auditory and visual; consider colours, one can tell a blind man everything there is to know about colours and yet when he would miraculously starts seeing for the first time his experience will be expanded.
@halfcadence14175 ай бұрын
Conception and expression are not the same thing
@farahali5754 Жыл бұрын
Perfect , A few good men
@farahali5754 Жыл бұрын
بحترم جداااااااا كبار السن في التعليم لا مثيل لهم Youth , his body language is more than mental expressions and thoughts
@casteretpollux Жыл бұрын
Language is social and historic and evolves rapidly in a social context and changing world. It's for communication. I'm.not seeing any mystery. Would anyone like to explain?
@atheoma7 ай бұрын
the mistery has been repeatedly articulated by noam in numerous interviews and lectures including this one. namely, the spoken/written language seemingly operates as a linear representation of symbols. on the other hand, reading or listening to a speech, we effectively ignore the linear sequence of words and decode the message as a complex structure which is not explicitly given. that means, we posses implicit ability to process any message tho this ability is totally separated from conciousness and unreachable by introspection. human kids demonstrate an exclusive ability to acquire language instinctly, long before they obtain enough linguistic data to learn the sintactic rules by statistic generalization of experience. the language is used almost exclusively for generating thought. humans, just as other animals, didn’t need language to communicate. being unable to generate complex recursive sintactic structures, big apes have still a profound system of communication with which they can communicate efficiently and sufficiently. the organs of speech were there long before the emergence of language so as in animals. try to scientifically explain all this with trivial statements like ‘language is social and historic and evolves rapidly in a social context and changing world’.
@czarquetzal83445 ай бұрын
Read poetry. Is the language of poetry serves to communicate?
@ghofranemohamed6782 Жыл бұрын
He's genius,😍
@linguistics1224 Жыл бұрын
What is this about?
@emiliogonzalez1412 Жыл бұрын
That questioner is pretty confused by Noam’s use of the word neural nets but I think he doesn’t know the term refers to both biological and artificial systems. It’s just common to use it in an artificial context these days.
@two_kopecks Жыл бұрын
16
@dyssakis Жыл бұрын
It's sad that the recording sucks so much
@LS-cc1zs Жыл бұрын
kzread.info/head/PLQGhw3BO_rdsQBzdiboBGaOYu-wbWBzVl Could you please share it for the others and me? I hope you like it ^^
@navenchang Жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@user-cx5ni7me6l Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the upload.
@abdulatifhamid1011 Жыл бұрын
wow indeed he is a greatest linguist
@noresponse1068 Жыл бұрын
He still alive?
@inef852 жыл бұрын
12:18 "Voluntary action is not a question which is currently fit for productive inquiry. " 👍 Brilliant response to the next time someone asks me why i broke something
@beahumane2 жыл бұрын
Great👌👌 #beahumane
@user-op4pl6dw1i2 жыл бұрын
Good morning I have reserch how can I be in contact with you thanks
@Lokitofrances2 жыл бұрын
Hello everyone! Could someone translate these lectures into Spanish? I'm very interested, but I don't understand any English. Thanks
@megakeenbeen2 жыл бұрын
What's the spelling of the person he referenced? Rene Huybrechts?
@vinm3002 жыл бұрын
Play on speed 1.5
@docnerd45702 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing. Such a legend.
@tongusaphea61562 жыл бұрын
I hope that other video can have subtitle for help person that english not good like me thaks you🥰
@mr.k9052 жыл бұрын
A master in the field of langue, unfortunately not in the field of speaking.
@BrenoAguiar972 жыл бұрын
I'm a brazilian linguistics student, can't even tell how blessed i feel on learning from Chomsky at YT lecture.
@georgeeroes2562 жыл бұрын
lefty looney shmendrick
@doubtingthelimit2 жыл бұрын
I really struggled paying attention to what he was saying, until I set it to 1,5 times the speed. My mind finally managed fully to focus on Chomsky‘s lecture (I have adhd), and this was great! 😊❤️
@uydfi352 жыл бұрын
i was just about to say this could be related to adhd since the same happens to me, glad you already know haha, glad you enjoyed the lecture, much love!
@doubtingthelimit2 жыл бұрын
@@uydfi35 I was only diagnosed two months ago, so it’s amazing to not feel dumb or like the weird one out and realized my brain is just wired a little bit different. Thank you for replying ❤️
@RobKohr2 жыл бұрын
There is a Firefox add-on called Video Speed Controller, and a similar on chrome. After a while you get used to faster speeds, and even the 2x limit that youtube gives you isn't enough, and a video like this is pretty comfortable at 3-3.5x.
@abisatyaahnaf1092 Жыл бұрын
Hard to understand
@SupeHero00 Жыл бұрын
Same for me and I don't have adhd
@dresdenliam2 жыл бұрын
Let's go Brandon
@dresdenliam2 жыл бұрын
Let's go Brandon
@rappakalja52952 жыл бұрын
Parrot
@autentyk57352 жыл бұрын
There is very little linguistics meat & potatoes on youtube as of late 2021. Hats off to Noam Chomsky, but you won't learn a whole lot from this lecture here.
@lukebradley79842 жыл бұрын
Abralin is the closest for a semi-lay audience. For something more structured, there is Martin Hilpert's long-running series. There are also a myriad of professors who put great stuff up just as a kind of personal record and get next to no views (for obvious reasons); a random example is Nathan Hill (SOAS).
@Risingsun2942 жыл бұрын
Best of the best for this guy..he makes us linguistics so damned proud
@dahoonkim19852 жыл бұрын
Can somebody explain why is it illegal in 9:19 ? Why is it violating all the movement?
@aaasthaa2 жыл бұрын
Julia falk Jesperson- notion of structure in mind
@EuDouArteHipHopArtCulture212 жыл бұрын
22:00
@czarquetzal83442 жыл бұрын
A very prolific thinker and public intellectual!
@dundoderdumme30442 жыл бұрын
49:44 What does he say? It's hard to understand. Chorine language?
@560crude22 жыл бұрын
poor i-language I guess
@makoberuangchannel92162 жыл бұрын
Nice infomation 611 ty
@serdaracar.official2 жыл бұрын
the king.
@melodyjang28762 жыл бұрын
I hope there is transcription available. It would be my valuable possession.
@czarquetzal83442 жыл бұрын
Why do you need a transcript? Just listen to him.
@DS-yg4qs2 жыл бұрын
Starts to talk about language... there he goes with Turing and Godel. No no no... language is about art, not math.
@Crowdle2 жыл бұрын
Yeah he really does inflate the complexity in explanation while also somehow managing to remove what’s natural about language
@jdm3656 Жыл бұрын
Language is used in both art and mathematics.
@gregpringle12993 жыл бұрын
Wow, no one noticed that X-bar theory ruled out exocentric constructions! It was a central point of structuralism -- how could you have missed it, Noam?
@BrenoAguiar973 жыл бұрын
In some places on Earth, we can't even think about having classes with the God Chomsky.
@englishplusacademy92113 жыл бұрын
A legend in the field of language. It is nice to see him giving live lecture.
Пікірлер
Mental giant, moral fool. I can still see him singing with Hugo Chavez before the demise of Venezuela. After the demise was well underway, Noam tried to back pedal with the typical "nobody ever does socialism right" lame excuse. PS_ I adore the comments...I haven't seen this much fawning since Bambi was released by Walt Disney studious in 1942.
الملحون فن مغربي عريق بدايته كانت في العصر الموحدي في القرن 12
I like the philosophical foundation of his linguistics - Essentialism. It retains something that cannot be fully grasped by empirical science
Nice to hear the late Jim McCawley get a couple shoutouts.
without exception, except for head movement 🤪25:03
Thanks for uploading the two lectures.
That Wink....
wow! a legend!
1:50 Galileo 2:08 How is it possible to express an inffinite number of ideas with a couple of dozens sounds, which in itself have nothing in common with the thoughts in our minds and allow us to understand what is not present in consicousness? That's indeed an interesting question. But, doesn't he goes too far with 3:06 "everything we can conceive and the most diverse movements of our soul" Some experiences are auditory and visual; consider colours, one can tell a blind man everything there is to know about colours and yet when he would miraculously starts seeing for the first time his experience will be expanded.
Conception and expression are not the same thing
Perfect , A few good men
بحترم جداااااااا كبار السن في التعليم لا مثيل لهم Youth , his body language is more than mental expressions and thoughts
Language is social and historic and evolves rapidly in a social context and changing world. It's for communication. I'm.not seeing any mystery. Would anyone like to explain?
the mistery has been repeatedly articulated by noam in numerous interviews and lectures including this one. namely, the spoken/written language seemingly operates as a linear representation of symbols. on the other hand, reading or listening to a speech, we effectively ignore the linear sequence of words and decode the message as a complex structure which is not explicitly given. that means, we posses implicit ability to process any message tho this ability is totally separated from conciousness and unreachable by introspection. human kids demonstrate an exclusive ability to acquire language instinctly, long before they obtain enough linguistic data to learn the sintactic rules by statistic generalization of experience. the language is used almost exclusively for generating thought. humans, just as other animals, didn’t need language to communicate. being unable to generate complex recursive sintactic structures, big apes have still a profound system of communication with which they can communicate efficiently and sufficiently. the organs of speech were there long before the emergence of language so as in animals. try to scientifically explain all this with trivial statements like ‘language is social and historic and evolves rapidly in a social context and changing world’.
Read poetry. Is the language of poetry serves to communicate?
He's genius,😍
What is this about?
That questioner is pretty confused by Noam’s use of the word neural nets but I think he doesn’t know the term refers to both biological and artificial systems. It’s just common to use it in an artificial context these days.
16
It's sad that the recording sucks so much
kzread.info/head/PLQGhw3BO_rdsQBzdiboBGaOYu-wbWBzVl Could you please share it for the others and me? I hope you like it ^^
Thanks.
Thanks for the upload.
wow indeed he is a greatest linguist
He still alive?
12:18 "Voluntary action is not a question which is currently fit for productive inquiry. " 👍 Brilliant response to the next time someone asks me why i broke something
Great👌👌 #beahumane
Good morning I have reserch how can I be in contact with you thanks
Hello everyone! Could someone translate these lectures into Spanish? I'm very interested, but I don't understand any English. Thanks
What's the spelling of the person he referenced? Rene Huybrechts?
Play on speed 1.5
Thank you for sharing. Such a legend.
I hope that other video can have subtitle for help person that english not good like me thaks you🥰
A master in the field of langue, unfortunately not in the field of speaking.
I'm a brazilian linguistics student, can't even tell how blessed i feel on learning from Chomsky at YT lecture.
lefty looney shmendrick
I really struggled paying attention to what he was saying, until I set it to 1,5 times the speed. My mind finally managed fully to focus on Chomsky‘s lecture (I have adhd), and this was great! 😊❤️
i was just about to say this could be related to adhd since the same happens to me, glad you already know haha, glad you enjoyed the lecture, much love!
@@uydfi35 I was only diagnosed two months ago, so it’s amazing to not feel dumb or like the weird one out and realized my brain is just wired a little bit different. Thank you for replying ❤️
There is a Firefox add-on called Video Speed Controller, and a similar on chrome. After a while you get used to faster speeds, and even the 2x limit that youtube gives you isn't enough, and a video like this is pretty comfortable at 3-3.5x.
Hard to understand
Same for me and I don't have adhd
Let's go Brandon
Let's go Brandon
Parrot
There is very little linguistics meat & potatoes on youtube as of late 2021. Hats off to Noam Chomsky, but you won't learn a whole lot from this lecture here.
Abralin is the closest for a semi-lay audience. For something more structured, there is Martin Hilpert's long-running series. There are also a myriad of professors who put great stuff up just as a kind of personal record and get next to no views (for obvious reasons); a random example is Nathan Hill (SOAS).
Best of the best for this guy..he makes us linguistics so damned proud
Can somebody explain why is it illegal in 9:19 ? Why is it violating all the movement?
Julia falk Jesperson- notion of structure in mind
22:00
A very prolific thinker and public intellectual!
49:44 What does he say? It's hard to understand. Chorine language?
poor i-language I guess
Nice infomation 611 ty
the king.
I hope there is transcription available. It would be my valuable possession.
Why do you need a transcript? Just listen to him.
Starts to talk about language... there he goes with Turing and Godel. No no no... language is about art, not math.
Yeah he really does inflate the complexity in explanation while also somehow managing to remove what’s natural about language
Language is used in both art and mathematics.
Wow, no one noticed that X-bar theory ruled out exocentric constructions! It was a central point of structuralism -- how could you have missed it, Noam?
In some places on Earth, we can't even think about having classes with the God Chomsky.
A legend in the field of language. It is nice to see him giving live lecture.
Lies again? Nurofen + Aspirin