Пікірлер

• 
  @111dudiСағат бұрын

  Omanis didn't conquer Africa.They conquered the Portuguese( at the request of the Africans) who ruled Africa but gun. Dont cheat peope

• 
  @MarcusAgrippa3905 сағат бұрын

  Overlooked details and rare subject matter plus quality over quantity. That's what sets you apart my friend, I click the like button before I even watch because I know it will be good 👍

• 
  @yanina.korolko9 сағат бұрын

  The original population of Georgia, the Colchis (ergisis) were black Africans, hence the black curly hair and black curly hair hats to mimic African hairstyles. ❤

• 
  @buddylobos527710 сағат бұрын

  Julius Ceaser saw Vikings in boats sail past the Roman galleons in port in Alexandria, Egypt. He wrote about it. And he ordered his ships to pursue. Roman ships could make about 3 knots. The Viking boats made about 11 knots. Much faster. He even described the men as having long hair and beards. Blonde and red in color. At 11 knots the Vikings on a direct line out of the Mediterranean Sea could have, possibly made North America in 2 weeks. Plus many islands, currents, winds etc would have been of great help. The Vikings knew the Earth and had a form of latitude and longitude. They knew their position and where they were and, where they were going.

• 
  @theshamanarchist54413 сағат бұрын

  He must have been a time travellar then?

• 
  @killeronxbox3602 сағат бұрын

  Julius Ceaser didn't see Vikings. He wrote about the German tribe peoples of the time, as well as the Celtic peoples of Gaul and Britain at the time

• 
  @tbq01111 сағат бұрын

  The Greeks went there ! The name Georgia is greek !

• 
  @giod626612 сағат бұрын

  Nice work, well done! Thanks!

• 
  @thisis_chavez15 сағат бұрын

  Great content ❤

• 
  @harithdanial14115 сағат бұрын

  As Muslim, i wish most of Muslim itself act like ibadi. The tolerance of religion are always made that society more open minded. That's why Muslim is well dislike today

• 
  @eagleeye18216 сағат бұрын

  Once again, you`re covering those areas of Georgian history nobody has ever covered on KZread. I really appreciate your time and dedication. Thank you very much for your hard work.

• 
  @StoicHistorian16 сағат бұрын

  Thank you!!

• 
  @BlueBird-wb6kb16 сағат бұрын

  Idk if they had so many ships i wonder if they could have just regrouped against the Normans and retaken there lands back , or go to Normandy to sack it lol

• 
  @luciusdomitiusaurelianus77417 сағат бұрын

  I see where this is going and can’t wait for the David the IV video it’s just one more video away 😭😭

• 
  @StoicHistorian16 сағат бұрын

  I know!!! Gonna be a banger

• 
  @rezaulkarimkhan97923 сағат бұрын

  Eu4 moment.

• 
  @Liberater4589Күн бұрын

  Bro was literally named Duke libtard

• 
  @geovanlКүн бұрын

  Atl vikings ?

• 
  @jordankiser8435Күн бұрын

  Love how much content you have been putting out! Thank you so much!

• 
  @StoicHistorianКүн бұрын

  Thanks for watching

• 
  @mueezadam8438Күн бұрын

  3:41 I love moments like this because it reveals that alongside the major events which influence historical figures, there are (often) hidden personal hopes and fears they struggle with. The worry of leaving behind a legacy, the joy of raising a child like yourself.

• 
  @georgekharati2882Күн бұрын

  Simply Amazing work! Easily one of the best videos on Georgian history I have ever seen on KZread.

• 
  @StoicHistorianКүн бұрын

  Thank you so much man

• 
  @djvel1587Күн бұрын

  I'm so happy this channel exists. Georgian history is so underrated, and you have a great way of storytelling. Thank you for this series!

• 
  @White_Door_8064Күн бұрын

  I've been loving you're Caucasian and oriental Christian peoples content; Very underappreciated! I respect that your presentations aren't overly flashy! Would love to see whom or what you're ready for these. Keep up the good work!

• 
  @StoicHistorianКүн бұрын

  Thank you, appreciate that

• 
  @nickmat994Күн бұрын

  Looking forward to this one when I get home. Thanks for consistent uploads bro! On a side note: if you would find this topic at all interesting to make a video on; I'd love to see the evolution of swords in the Caucuses region pre and post middle ages. Weapon analysis tends to be dry and technical, but the human stories you weave into the historical happenings might service this type of analysis well. In my reading I've come across so many different types of swords from the historic Armenian-Highlands region. I have to imagine this is because so many cultures conducted war in these territories from Romans, Persians, Seljuks, Georgians, Byzantines, to Russians and Ottomans. The swords start off looking like super curved Yatagans of Kurdish horse-riders, then like a straight edge Georgian Shashkas, followed by the Persian/Seljuk Kilij. There's also a whole host of swords that look like hybrids of all the aforementioned during the Byzantine wars blending the hilts, pommels, guards and blades. Around the time of the Cilician kingdom they all tend to look closer to the Kilij, but it would be a cool video cataloguing the changes based on encounters with various rival nations up until that point.

• 
  @StoicHistorianКүн бұрын

  That’s a great idea, I’ll have to put it on the list for the future

• 
  @JoeSmith-sl9bqКүн бұрын

  Insane how the east Orthodox realms like Rome and Georgia kept killing and undermining themselves as the Muslims were conquering them

• 
  @nickmat994Күн бұрын

  Yeah it's insane.

• 
  @Zarastro5414 сағат бұрын

  Tale as old as time unfortunately. Throughout all cultures humans have always been our own worst enemies.

• 
  @yanina.korolko9 сағат бұрын

  East orthodox Christianity has nothing to do with Rome😢!!! It's a very unpleasant misconception. Russian Christianity, Georgian Christianity, which are considered eastern orthodox are not Roman Christian religions… eastern Christianity is a Muslim camouflage. Know the truth.

• 
  @gmfrunzikКүн бұрын

  Wasnt he the one who created bagratid armenia?

• 
  @horactik9838Күн бұрын

  isn't Bagratid armenia hundreds of years before the dates in this video.

• 
  @gmfrunzikКүн бұрын

  @@horactik9838 ok i checked Both georgia and armenia had a period where this dynasty had ruled It started in armenia 20 yrs before it did in georgia.

• 
  @larrywaveКүн бұрын

  Im early it seems 😄

• 
  @prs_81Күн бұрын

  Emad Jalayir is that one side character in the show that just doesn't die and keeps popping up to annoy the main characters.

• 
  @kabdul9208Күн бұрын

  I hope it was pun but Shah Rukh actually means Shah is king in Farsi & Rukh is both Arabic & Farsi word which means Soul or Sprit. So since old time Muslim world was poetic that means Sprit of King or a spiritual King.

• 
  @levanikojulakidze5213Күн бұрын

  Keep up bro we will support you🫵🏻❤️‍🩹

• 
  @2gulfalcoКүн бұрын

  well this is weird for me, I lived in Sakartvelo about a decade ago and heard some stories about this, just assumed it was all made up!

• 
  @shubhammagar5387Күн бұрын

  The king was too powerful ❤❤❤❤

• 
  @melkormorgothbauglir.4848Күн бұрын

  I wonder what how bad they did the Georgians that even his own troops who killed thousands horrifically already started feeling sorry.

• 
  @melkormorgothbauglir.4848Күн бұрын

  TImur really the Jon Jones (shoutout to everybody who watches MMA and knows who he is) of steppe warlords unwilling to accept defeat no matter what bribing his enemies troops diverting rivers making skull towers and he wasn't true to his religion too.

• 
  @mobileapp90562 күн бұрын

  Last I heard, New England was in the western hemisphere

• 
  @aboubakrouladabdellah661116 сағат бұрын

  Nova means new?

• 
  @xxora65682 күн бұрын

  I wonder how they effected the genetics of the region

• 
  @theMOCmaster2 күн бұрын

  I suppose everything east of the Black Sea is serkland? Because that’s also what I’ve heard they called the caspian areas, which were actually Muslim (saracen)

• 
  @StoicHistorian2 күн бұрын

  yeah grouping by association is what i presumed

• 
  @Chris-us6pkКүн бұрын

  That's a racist comment by you. ​@@StoicHistorian

• 
  @StoicHistorianКүн бұрын

  @@Chris-us6pk nope it’s what the sources say

• 
  @WalesTheTrueBritons2 күн бұрын

  Side note if I may: the Goverment of Wales recently commissioned a cover up of a mural on the wall of a South Wales Church depicting the meteor of the 500s, and the images of Madoc readying to leave Britain for America, it was re-discovered after the Normans had covered the wall with brick, sat ignored for 50 odd years, and now has been painted over. Disgusting treatment of such important history! The contents were of a red oily hue with Men carrying small boats onto a larger Galleon and a shooting star (Meteor) in the background. Funny thing is it’s depicting a time period when Galleons apparently didn’t exist. The name Galleon is also curious, The “Gal” is ever present with the Britons. Even today the latins know Wales as the “Land of the Gauls”. And the Gal appears everywhere they have been. The Welsh have the same legends as the Irish, where they claim to be originally from the Middle East and the Gal appears throughout Western and Southern Europe and the Middle East.

• 
  @WalesTheTrueBritons2 күн бұрын

  The only Europeans to travel to America Before Columbus were the Britons (Bow known as Welsh people) the Vikings may have landed in Canada, but certainly not the US as we know it today. The Brandenburg stone proves it!!! For some reason academia want nothing more than to discredit the Britons and elevate the Nord!

• 
  @postyoda16232 күн бұрын

  The fact of persianization is overstated by illiterate persian nationalist sources as their history curriculum in their schools doesn't contain world history so that they develop this delusion that they are the only people that exist on the planet. Acculturation of the invaders is a fact of history starting from Akkadians. Most invaders who come from less populous lands have to take on the character of the invaded to rule them better as they don't have the numbers to fill in the ranks of local beaurocracy. This happened until the industrial revolution everywhere, including in China, India, Rome, Greece, and with Normans, Himyarites, Gauls, Norse etc. Even the British were starting to dress like Indians and assimilate until industrialization and ideas of scientific race in mid 19th century made it both easy to rule from afar and amalgamation obsolete and idea of supremacy of cultures commonplace.

• 
  @Mauri77822 күн бұрын

  Spain also stole the identity of its people. Up to this day they still deny their Moroccan origins due to their inferiority complex

• 
  @mortenovergaard73972 күн бұрын

  saerkland probably comes from the old norse word, "saerk", meaning a tunic, or a piece of cloth to cover the upper body.

• 
  @antoniescargo1529Күн бұрын

  You have a Dutch name.

• 
  @mortenovergaard739722 сағат бұрын

  @@antoniescargo1529 it's Danish :).

• 
  @larsrons79372 күн бұрын

  Thank you for an interesting journey with Ingvar and his Vikings.

• 
  @StoicHistorian2 күн бұрын

  Thank you for watching

• 
  @larsrons79372 күн бұрын

  @@StoicHistorian You're welcome. 2+5 = seven words for the algoritm. 😊

• 
  @caniblmolstr4522 күн бұрын

  Shah Rukh's strategy seems similar to that of Tokugawa. Extremely patient. But moving swiftly as soon as he knew victory was more than guaranteed

• 
  @StoicHistorian2 күн бұрын

  I agree with that yeah good comparison

• 
  @caniblmolstr4522 күн бұрын

  @@StoicHistorian there is but a downside to such strategists. As they can't create opportunities. They have to wait for the other to make a mistake. While generals like Napoleon, Alexander, Timur and Hannibal don't have to wait for such opportunities to appear. They force their opponents to show them one. Napoleon used to weaken his flanks to invite his enemies or abruptly vacate high positions. Hanniba used to weaken his own center so as to envelop his enemies with his Numidian cavalry. While Timur or Robert Guiscard was just crafty as a fox using whatever works. Such generals are ultimately the best. Not Tokugawa or ShahRukh

• 
  @DonnellGreen2 күн бұрын

  @@caniblmolstr452 Yep Tokugawa becoming Shogun was one of the most Lucky dominos falling into place scenarios I have ever seen, Well besides The Rise Of The Ottomans.

• 
  @catapetrovich66882 күн бұрын

  If I was a Georgian, I wouldn't believe this pseudo-historical narrative that sounds like a fable.

• 
  @StoicHistorian2 күн бұрын

  well its likely real

• 
  @TalesfromVirginia2 күн бұрын

  William the bastard

• 
  @ansfridaeyowulfsdottir80952 күн бұрын

  You could not even spell "Æthling" correctly for your crappy subtitles? And he was the son of Edgar the Exile and Agatha. The Anglo-Saxons elected their kings from a handful of royal houses. {:o:O:}

• 
  @StoicHistorian2 күн бұрын

  Nah I know how to spell aethling was trying something cool like sk8 viiiling

• 
  @soderlund36102 күн бұрын

  Ingvar was the grandchild to the famous swedish king Erik the victorious (Eiríkr inn sigrsæli). Jaroslav I of Kiev was married to the swedish princess Ingegerd Olofsdotter, daughter to the swedish king Olof Skötkonung (Óláfr skautkonungr)

• 
  @Xaiff2 күн бұрын

  Here I am, wondering what’s this video got to do with Kuch Kuch Hota Hai Damn, I’m being dumb.🗿

• 
  @farhanraiyan3 күн бұрын

  Sharuk was timurs only successor who properly roled his empir. He was a great roler. But like mongol empire timur empire also collapse.

• 
  @mpetersen63 күн бұрын

  At first l thought Georgia? Really? Then reality set in.

• 
  @StoicHistorian3 күн бұрын

  Got ya!

• 
  @juanantoniomarcelinodiaz82723 күн бұрын

  Admiral Nelson lost an arm while trying to conquer the Canary Islands. In 1797 the British tried to take over Tenerife. They wanted to subject all the Canary Islands under the British crown. A bullet fired by the "Tigre" cannon manufactured in Seville left him without his right arm. Lieutenant General Gutiérrez, defender of the islands, had 1,700 men under his command. Nelson had 4,000 men. To justify his defeat, Nelson argued that he had faced 8,000 men. There were 1,700 but they were worth like 8,000.

• 
  @StoicHistorian3 күн бұрын

  Had no idea that was at Tenerife I’m gonna have to make a video about this

• 
  @youthoughtaboutit69463 күн бұрын

  Edward the confessor never had any children and was even by some accounts celibate in spite of having a wife for political reasons (which is part of the reason why William the conqueror claimed the throne of England after Edward the confessor’s death to begin with, among other reasons, because Edward had to children to succeed him). Edward Ætheling was Edward the confessor’s nephew, and the son of Edmund Ironside, who was the half brother of Edward the confessor and was king before him (Anglo-Saxon kingship was dynastic elective, generally speaking). So yeah, Edward Ætheling was Edward the confessor’s nephew, not his son, and Edward the confessor himself never actually had any children.

• 
  @StoicHistorian3 күн бұрын

  My mistake, I got it confused considering he was next in line for the throne

• 
  @youthoughtaboutit69463 күн бұрын

  @@StoicHistorian no harm; no foul, and yeah, the way Anglo-Saxon succession tended to work even on paper tends to make things harder to track than they otherwise would be.