Пікірлер

• 
  @Suhaschintala4 минут бұрын

  we NEED Countries Mission tree tierlist. The criteria being - permanent modifiers !!!!! - Temporary modifiers which are bonkers i think france mission tree or

• 
  @adeafault23526 минут бұрын

  Ideas for possible future tier lists: Advisor tier list Policy tier list Idea group tier list (basic but still works) National ideas tier list (this would be a big one) Subcontinent/region tier list Estate privilege tier list Government reform tier list (very big)

• 
  @adeafault23523 минут бұрын

  You could also split the government reform list into the different the tiers, like- tier 1 government reform tier list Tier 2 government reform tier list Etc.

• 
  @mrvalereyans83206 минут бұрын

  We need policies tier list

• 
  @DANI-jj1mb14 минут бұрын

  Personally the reason why I pick is smaller nations is because I don't want to start too powerful. The feeling of starting small and growing, feeling like you have ACHIEVED everything you have and not just begin with it + I don't want to spend so much time at the beginning of the match micro managing all the free provinces I got who have stuff set that I have NOT chosen because I began with it already given to me. I want it all to be mine and personally I mostly play CK3, I suck at any other Paradox Game. But if I fail I want to know that it was my mistake and not just the fact that I was lost in a big faction or that the reason I am thriving is just that faction and not my actions.

• 
  @heliogonzalezsanchez822724 минут бұрын

  Is it me or is the audio and the video desynchronized? It seems like it, but I'm not sure

• 
  @annoyingsmuganimeavatar722938 минут бұрын

  >the good guys won this goyim

• 
  @XochiCh39 минут бұрын

  I guess what I’m about to ask isn’t a tier list, but it could be seen as a “modifier stacking” thing, but I wonder, what combination of nation forming, missions, religion, events and modifiers would give one the most amount of special units…? (Sorry, I get hyper fixated on tiny Eu4 mechanics, and think about them all the time, this time it’s special units.)

• 
  @DrLongWang43 минут бұрын

  Mission reward tier list when?

• 
  @tsaralexis945943 минут бұрын

  Yo my suggestion

• 
  @sirflasm345644 минут бұрын

  Mission rewards tier list when?

• 
  @LemonCake10143 минут бұрын

  Paradox made too many missions :(

• 
  @bekey455112 минут бұрын

  Then only Permanent modifiers, sorted by continent

• 
  @samiiiyusufff54 минут бұрын

  I like playing minors more than major nations because it's fun to turn a literal city states into superpowers Or not even city states but minor nations in general

• 
  @telavus92057 минут бұрын

  So what you explained at about 12:00 about AI not accounting for morale damage modifiers.... is this why so many american + african native countries just randomly decide to stack wipe themselves in fights they themselves pick? I've seen it happen more than once that the AI send their tech 4 20k stacks straight in to my tech 8 european 40k stacks.....

• 
  @LemonCake10156 минут бұрын

  Normal morale they should calculate, this is referring to the 'new' morale damage modifier.

• 
  @Hakimgrr_Сағат бұрын

  I was interested and curious but an hour is kinda lmao

• 
  @LemonCake10157 минут бұрын

  Welcome to the tier list format: you can skip to the end if you just want to see the list, but the hour is spent explaining my placements.

• 
  @ABDchessСағат бұрын

  How about technology tier list?

• 
  @LemonCake10157 минут бұрын

  Maybe? It's a bit of a weird one to do 'visually'

• 
  @SirvalianСағат бұрын

  Ming won CK3. By the time Victoria ends in 1936, the US had already surpassed Britain in capacity.

• 
  @Noobmaster-of3xkСағат бұрын

  WE LOVE SIEGE ABILITY

• 
  @LemonCake10156 минут бұрын

  WOO SIEGING

• 
  @GhosterMСағат бұрын

  Will you be trying to get a spot in the next season of Para Bellum?

• 
  @LemonCake10155 минут бұрын

  I got asked for the current one if I was available, and indeed I was, but clearly they had too many signups as is.

• 
  @max-imal8588Сағат бұрын

  I mean protecting trade can be useful in mps, if you for some reason cant fully conquer a tradenode, and privateering can be fun to steal money from other players.

• 
  @abrvalg32155 минут бұрын

  If you aren't strong enough to conquer a node and start using trade ships, strong guys will get an incentive to punish you.

• 
  @LemonCake10154 минут бұрын

  Both are a great way to get people to declare war on you and lose your land: protecting trade especially. If you do it to an extent that matters, get ready for the player to fight back instead of the classic AI 'oh well I guess I will just let the player take 80% of my economy'.

• 
  @MangoInfinity120 минут бұрын

  @@LemonCake101i mean, as france you can force England to invest more ships into trade, or get more trade from the Caribbean or ivory coast to spain or the english channel

• 
  @yaboyalaska7550Сағат бұрын

  i yes i love comically detailed explanations about comically mundane elements of comically complex games i don't play

• 
  @LemonCake101Сағат бұрын

  Ah yes, well enjoy!

• 
  @alessandrocarrera5569Сағат бұрын

  Its time for the best custom nation ideas

• 
  @LemonCake101Сағат бұрын

  please no

• 
  @onodera3964Сағат бұрын

  @@LemonCake101 Just S-tier custom ideas will be fine.

• 
  @LemonCake10153 минут бұрын

  @@onodera3964 not really a complete tier list then is it :(

• 
  @Finn1x49 минут бұрын

  ​@@LemonCake101 still better than every province tier list, right?

• 
  @thebeardman7533Сағат бұрын

  But who doesn't love privetering just for the meme

• 
  @LemonCake101Сағат бұрын

  👀

• 
  @demrandomСағат бұрын

  tbf, i privateer for the PP and when there's a wicked rich node outside of my trade steering. I've had 2% of the trade power of a node in pirates hand me 15 ducats a month before, and gain me 10 pp.

• 
  @zenmastakilla42 минут бұрын

  Privateering*.

• 
  @LemonCake101Сағат бұрын

  Another one suggested on my discord, so speaking of which: Come talk in my Discord: discord.gg/bSs2e9YsFv And if you love what I do and want to directly support me for some cool perks, or want to buy a province tier list, you can do so here: ko-fi.com/lemoncake101

• 
  @homoe79763 сағат бұрын

  I have always had this idea of playing a city state in Civ V, influencing events "behind the scenes". Love it as a trade league in EU IV too, but you do get pushed into gobbling up stuff.

• 
  @Jesus_Zendejas3 сағат бұрын

  Honestly these games are basically 1 game or series like the Total War games. They just tweak what was appropriate for each time period.

• 
  @Tovalokodonc4 сағат бұрын

  Hungary wasn't destroyed after the Varna Crusade, what are you on about? 😂😂

• 
  @LemonCake1014 сағат бұрын

  Nocked out of contenting the title of ‘winner’, not literally full annexed.

• 
  @Tovalokodonc4 сағат бұрын

  @@LemonCake101 Not really. Under King Matthias I, Hungary was one of the biggest military powers. If we count levy capability, retinues and the Black Army, even stronger than the Ottomans.

• 
  @LemonCake1013 сағат бұрын

  @@Tovalokodonc Yes, but that's 1458 and we are checking 1453.

• 
  @Tovalokodonc2 сағат бұрын

  @@LemonCake101 I guess, fair point, but it's not like Hungary itself actually weakened, hence why there weren't any direct Ottoman follow-ups after Varna

• 
  @LemonCake10153 минут бұрын

  @@Tovalokodonc no fair, I meant more specifically the claim of Hungary as Great Power n1 was destroyed at Varna.

• 
  @VonKrauzer4 сағат бұрын

  British puts GB as a "winner" of EU4. Checks out.

• 
  @isaacshultz812811 сағат бұрын

  I really want a cold war paradox title

• 
  @halfofapicture12 сағат бұрын

  I would argue that the good guys only 50% won WW2 with the Soviets still in power oppressing Eastern Europe and Northern Asia.

• 
  @Michaelonyoutub13 сағат бұрын

  If the CK 2/3 end date and EU4 start date was just a little earlier, you could make a very reasonable argument that England would have won CK 2/3 as well. Soon before 1444, England controlled most of France and was on the precipice of wiping out the French monarchy, but then Joan of Arc happened and the war completely flipped. If England had most of France at the end/start date, then they could be considered to have won, since they are only a few steps away from forming an Angevin Empire, which would be perfectly positioned to dominate both the continent and the seas.

• 
  @GarfieldRex13 сағат бұрын

  I thought this was going to be a video about dozens and dozens of game runs and see which country won the most times in each game. Satisfied nevertheless xd but now I need a video like that

• 
  @klausi-mausi14 сағат бұрын

  Feels odd to use "nations" for CK2 and 3 rather than dynasties and families, considering that that's the whole focus of CK.

• 
  @emanuelneagu1415 сағат бұрын

  despite historically these nations have risen somewhere around 1500-1600s and already had fallen before year 1812, in late game EU4 I usually see Spain and the Ottomans in top 3 Great Powers, the Ottomans claiming military hegemon many times before me (because I just like playing tall and making a heaven out of whatever region I conquered rather than having late game wars).

• 
  @nathanielknight183815 сағат бұрын

  most often it's just fun history, I liked Granada into Andalusia or growing as Byzantium or Butua into Rozwi for the story (and good ideas). I also like forming Rum which is basically just the Ottomans but forming a nation is always fun. I think the big nations especially spain and England for example are way too focused on colonial ideas to be really fun. Even Russia is fun because you form it from Muscovy but where's the fun in playing Poland? You get a PU, then you get a coalition after taking half a province in western Europe. Then you sit around.

• 
  @ArsBor15 сағат бұрын

  I want to eat lemon cake

• 
  @matwiw17 сағат бұрын

  In general, if we consider eu4 end date (1821) not in the game mechanics, but in historical reality, the victory is really for Russia. 7 years before that Russia had defeated Napoleon, its international prestige was at the highest level even possible, and Russia itself became the gendarme of Europe, created the Holy Alliance, which for some time dictated European politics. It was a very short hegemony, which started to shatter in 1830, but technically they won.

• 
  @micharuoff675917 сағат бұрын

  Some Maps of the world would have been nice to visualize everything

• 
  @bishopbrennan355817 сағат бұрын

  You should've used in-game scoring mechanics.

• 
  @GusanGaming19 сағат бұрын

  Given that you said 'by the rules of the game' GB absolutely won EU4 because US never got independence, and the ottomans took enough of the steppes that Russia can't thrive

• 
  @apossiblyhereticalalphaleg359520 сағат бұрын

  I disagree with the Victoria 2/3 winner. By 1936, I'd say the US is significantly more ascendant than the UK, even if the UK is not as ravaged as it would be by 1945, when the US establishes complete hegemony over the West. By 1936, the US was well under it's way to recovering from the Great Depression, many european countries were still beholden to it debt wise from WW1 lend leases and, as we find out in 1940, the US military is very good and surprisingly prepared for war.

• 
  @zhsloe21 сағат бұрын

  (pronouncing everything purely British) NO, I AM NOT BIASED TOWARDS THE BRITS (after just having told us that Britain basically won the world history)

• 
  @LemonCake10121 сағат бұрын

  They would have won it earlier too, if those Americans weren't traitors

• 
  @KarczekWieprzowy22 сағат бұрын

  Imo 1337 (though I know it's incorrect end date for ck2) was won by Golden Horde and/or other Mongol Empire successor states Although already in decline they still were a powerhouse that would still remain for quite a while

• 
  @Your_Eagle_One22 сағат бұрын

  But who won Stellaris

• 
  @aleksjamnik536022 сағат бұрын

  i would say Vic winner is america they will end the game in the best position the british are a rooting corpse with a great big shadow over the world but no real life line only 20 years after the end date basically all of the british main holding are indepent or semi indepent hoi4 wise i would the objective off hoi4 is military conquest and land army might which i thing the soviets win but i don't nesserly dissagree that the americans deserve the win just i think you could argue that the soviets win it on the basis of pure land army strenght and conquest with the americans not expanding there territory while the soviets do so greatly other then that yeah i would say your deff right

• 
  @DJLaZyI22 сағат бұрын

  Phocas II 😂😂

• 
  @Galaick23 сағат бұрын

  Um, you forgot a Paradox game. Who won Stellaris?

• 
  @alexg391123 сағат бұрын

  I wanted to know who won Stellaris 😔

• 
  @ABDchessКүн бұрын

  Nice video!

• 
  @genovayork2468Күн бұрын

  Spain didn't exist before 1707, boso.

• 
  @MrCr1spy1Күн бұрын

  Who won East vs West?

• 
  @user-yy5di3qg5u22 сағат бұрын

  Also USA (and NATO faction). Even if it seemed like an even match, the USSR collapsed in the end, along with the Warsaw Pact faction.

• 
  @genovayork2468Күн бұрын

  Wars have no good guys and bad guys, little kid, with exception of WWI.