Пікірлер

• 
  @Random_Gamer24027 күн бұрын

  Nelson and rodney have 16 inch guns and took out the bismarck earlier in the game and took there time to finish off the scharnhorst, the bismarck ai did not angle correctly to use her full potential.

• 
  @StuartKoehlАй бұрын

  Total BS. Not only was the Mk.7 gun and its 2700-lb AP shell ballistically superior to the 18.1-inch shell of the Yamato (which had notoriously bad dispersion), the Iowa class had far superior radar fire control, which would have enabled first salvo hits at ranges in excess of 20,000 meters. Moreover, with a five knot advantage over Yamato, the Iowa could dictate the range at which the engagement took place, staying within its immune zone and hammering Yamato until her directors and rangefinders were disabled--at which point Iowa could close to a killing range. It should also be noted that, at long range, the Yamato's horizontal protection was eminently vulnerable to the Iowa's 16-inch guns.

• 
  @user-yg3kh2kt6vАй бұрын

  Cómo se llama el juego?????

• 
  @chriskostopoulos8142Ай бұрын

  In reality there is no way the Germans would of taken this fight on. They would of used their speed advantage and just run.

• 
  @Caroline_Grace-Gaspar.2 ай бұрын

  Game name please

• 
  @PaulEli_GamingYT2 ай бұрын

  What version is that it is realistic graphics like atlantic fleet

• 
  @imansaiful-hz9ui2 ай бұрын

  Team lowa Team yamoto 👇🏻

• 
  @martinhaigh83453 ай бұрын

  In real life, Iowa would have used its 6kt speed advantage to withdraw, and called in an airstrike.

• 
  @juncyrus3263 ай бұрын

  Play Atlantic fleet pls

• 
  @jayjay9753 ай бұрын

  bismark and sharnhorst missed to much bismark didnt hit anything

• 
  @raymond78803 ай бұрын

  Germans had better optics but not a generation ahead, just marginally better. Once damaged of course they are useless.

• 
  @danielslocum71694 ай бұрын

  lame.

• 
  @danielslocum71694 ай бұрын

  Reminds me of watching Rat Patrole where the poor dumb Germans just couldnt seem to hit anything.

• 
  @user-mi4jd9ji8i5 ай бұрын

  ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Por fin ganaron, los ingleses!!!!!!!!.

• 
  @georgecoventry84415 ай бұрын

  As usual, the AI ships make the fatal error of approaching bow-on, thus negating a very large part of their firepower. It amazes me that this problem with the AI has never been corrected by the game designers. It does allow the player to usually defeat the AI in anything like an equal match...no matter which nationality the player is commanding. Another point: The German ships have a significant speed advantage, so it is not in their interest to close the range! Better to keep things at long range, in case they get badly damaged and need to make smoke and escape. Nelson and Rodney, being slower, do not have that luxury if things start to go wrong for them.

• 
  @enteriprse335 ай бұрын

  Yamato Vs 3 republic carriers

• 
  @trevortrevortsr26 ай бұрын

  Nelsons saw the threat of 15" gun and took them down ASP - the 11" could then be deconstructed at leisure

• 
  @quocnamnguyen46656 ай бұрын

  Yamato

• 
  @KauherHeich20456 ай бұрын

  Game link please.

• 
  @famaz63494 ай бұрын

  Its not free

• 
  @brianyoung5257 ай бұрын

  Scharnhorst and Gneisenau were supposed to be upgraded to 9 15in guns in triple turrets that they never put in. They 13in main belt. Would of been better then Bismarck

• 
  @enteriprse338 ай бұрын

  Nooooooooo gosh dang it 😫

• 
  @trevortrevortsr28 ай бұрын

  Them Swordfish are amazing

• 
  @user-kw1tq7wj3f9 ай бұрын

  How do u download this game?

• 
  @thearmoredman83198 ай бұрын

  From happy mod

• 
  @macpaul13919 ай бұрын

  Game for stupid kiddos or people who remained on this age level of the "modern world" full of idiots!

• 
  @knutritter4619 ай бұрын

  This is a crappy scenario and there's no fun watching it.

• 
  @moronicnapoleonicАй бұрын

  Womp womp

• 
  @walterrolando21279 ай бұрын

  Quien desarrollo el juego? El departamento de prensa de la Royal Navi? Porque esta lejos de ser real, Los viejos acorazados Ingleses estaban en perfecta posición con toda la artilleria al costado, eran lentos para correr y tambien lentos oara disoarar, solo 2 rondas por minuto, e hicieron blanco casi simpre, y ganaron 🧐. mientras que el Bismarck y su compañero eran mas modernos conmejor sistema de disparo, eran mas rapidos y tenian mqyor cafwncia de tiro, 3 rondas por minuto. Asi y todo estaban mal puestos, solo con la artilleria de proa solo la mitad de los cañones tenian disponibles, y asi no peleaban, parecia que los artileron del Bismark y su compañero, eran no videtes porque casi no le hicieron blanco a los viejos Acorazasos Ingleses.🙄🤨🧐

• 
  @Marc-dm1fh11 ай бұрын

  Pays to fly a Stringbag. All those modern types getting shot down left, right and centre

• 
  @norfolkcoastmodels Жыл бұрын

  Hood had a crack crew, but in these scenarios keeps missing, something wrong with the simulation.

• 
  @peterwest4299 Жыл бұрын

  Very good game. Key is to aim for turrets and knock them out

• 
  @renown16 Жыл бұрын

  Nelson or Rodney by themselves would be able to sink both ships. The Germans would be running out the non existent door.

• 
  @AV8BHARRIERPLUS Жыл бұрын

  Sorry, but i can´t believe this situation. Certainly, both british battleships got guns of greater caliber, but are only eighteen pieces against forty two germans (24 in the three Hipper and 18 in the three Deutschland).The number of rounds that the german ships can shoot is very superior and the probability of hits as well. Even more, all german ships mounted torpedoes. In a realisitic situation, is mor probably both battleships sunk and one or several german cruisers damaged (maybe some of them sunk). Any Admiral would accept a combat in that conditions (except, maybe, Beatty)

• 
  @johnfisher9692 Жыл бұрын

  Hood would crush Scharnhorst with ease. The weak German armament with thin deck armour, only 2 inches would make her easy meat. And that's ignoring the proven fact heavy German naval shells had a very high failure rate and the structural weaknesses that plagued most German WW2 ships. Remember BOTH Scharnhorst's ran from HMS Renown.

• 
  @Phaaschh Жыл бұрын

  I've yet to see one of these where Hood doesn't behave like a roman candle against any opposition. Fire on the boat deck an obligatory feature.

• 
  @BobSmith-dk8nw Жыл бұрын

  _Great Naval Battles_ could be played over a LAN. I had two of my buddies over and we fought it out between three of the American Standard 16" gun ships and one 14" Gun Ship and the German Navy. Germans had both battleships and both battle cruisers 4 Heavies on each side 4 Cruisers No Destroyers. The guy who was supposed to help me run the Americans didn't show - so - I was a very busy boy - and actually had a collision ... Those 16" guns made all the difference though. What doomed the Germans in this engagement - was that Tirpitz took a steering hit - and could only circle ... The Germans elected to stay with her - and those 16" guns just tore them apart. This match up here - was heavily in favor of the British. The Germans should have had _Bismarck_ and _Tirpitz_ . That would still favor the British but the Germans might have a chance. The other thing here - is that the German's fire was terribly inaccurate vs. the fire of the British. If this was Player vs. The Computer - my assumption here - is that it was set to something like "Easy Mode" where the side opposing the player would play stupidly and not be able to hit anything. IRL - the Germans would have just run away. No way in hell would they have taken on these two ships - when they had such a speed advantage. .

• 
  @rudigerkaltenmeier7565 Жыл бұрын

  Die Bismark hat mit 6 Salven Die Hood versenkt also was soll dieser Quatsch hier?

• 
  @billgere5293 Жыл бұрын

  I’m pretty sure that the German Heavy Cruisers 8” guns or for that matter the German Pocket Battleships 11” guns wouldn’t even penetrate the North Carolina’s armor. You just got to love bad game dynamics. 😂

• 
  @jmthandverk6830 Жыл бұрын

  Bullshit, the german ships were way superior at targeting and hitting, easy win for kriegsmarine

• 
  @YARROWS9 Жыл бұрын

  18×16" shells compared to 8×15" and 9×11" is no contest.

• 
  @Mognemind28 күн бұрын

  It's not intrinsecally the caliber, it's the weight, the speed and the angle. British 16" guns were developed to fire slower shells but fired with higher angles, compared to other 16" of the same period. A larger caliber does not necessarily means heavier shell, (at least while talking about small differences, like 15" and 16", of course 11" is way smaller). Nevertheless, I agree with your comment, Scharnorst was fast, well armoured, but lacked in sheer firepower, her main guns were excellent against any ship smaller than a cruiser but surely unfit against other armoured battleships. Surely her speed could save her from many treats at the time of her construction. After all, the bulk of British, French and American battleship forces were old dreadnoughts, some of which were modernized but were still slower than Scharnhorst. Ultimately she met her demise when she faced a modern battleship that could match her speed.

• 
  @David-wf4mh Жыл бұрын

  lame.. both english ships fire all weapons .. germans just the front once.. lel.. unrealitic .. and even if.. they are much faster.. easy escape... in a real fight.. the germans would smash them.

• 
  @PotatoSalad61410 ай бұрын

  Germany have no major naval victories

• 
  @David-wf4mh10 ай бұрын

  🤡@@PotatoSalad614

• 
  @PotatoSalad61410 ай бұрын

  @@David-wf4mh no valid response = I win

• 
  @David-wf4mh10 ай бұрын

  🤡@@PotatoSalad614

• 
  @PotatoSalad61410 ай бұрын

  @@David-wf4mh ez wins

• 
  @kpdbt3055 Жыл бұрын

  Really seems to be a bias toward the gunnery skills for the British as clearly history showed the Kriegsmarine had excellent gunnery skills.

• 
  @evo5dave Жыл бұрын

  They didn't score a single hit on Rodney in the real battle.

• 
  @daveharden5929 Жыл бұрын

  Love this game! This was a interesting match-up. I wonder. Did you intend? The Hood is a powerful challenge. It has 15" guns with 12" belt, 15" turret and yet a paltry 3" deck armours. While Gneisenau would seem to barely qualify for this contest with its 11" guns. However, it makes up with its substantial 15" belt, 14" turrets and NINE (9") inch deck!

• 
  @norfolkcoastmodels Жыл бұрын

  Hood's deck armour was 7 inches

• 
  @waldek23034 ай бұрын

  @@norfolkcoastmodels Nope.

• 
  @mettetovborg-cy6vb Жыл бұрын

  Prins eugen?

• 
  @andreynovikov5376 Жыл бұрын

  In this game human beats bot. If you play for Germans you will destroy both "Nelson" easily

• 
  @user-ci6dx2lf7g Жыл бұрын

  🛋😊

• 
  @edtrine8692 Жыл бұрын

  Bad choice. The German 11" shells would have been like spitballs to Nelson and Rodney?

• 
  @marcosfernandez7207 Жыл бұрын

  Historical accuracity is not a strong part of this game, lol

• 
  @josephkrenzer627 Жыл бұрын

  With such an advantage in speed neither German ship would have approached close, they would have easily controlled the engagement all things considered. Also, why wouldn't the German ships turn to allow the aft turrets to engage? Again, they would have easily set the stage against the sluggish cows Rodney and Nelson.

• 
  @PotatoSalad614 Жыл бұрын

  Just admit your favourite battleship is an overrated POS

• 
  @alganhar1 Жыл бұрын

  Lol. Look. You went on in another comment how the short, stubby Nelson and Rodney's hull shape meant they could not be fast, now you are saying they are sluggish. problem is you are counter arguing yourself. You see short, stubby ships are actually more manoeuvrable than long, slender ships. Its a function of length to beam ratio. The Nelson and Rodney were actually very agile for 35,000 ton Battleships. As for Bismarck, well... lets hit you with an unpleasant truth shall we? Of all of the the contemporary Battleships that were laid down and launched at around the same time, the Tirpitz and the Bismarck were hands down the worst. The only thing they were was bigger, but the Italians got better combat power, similar speed (but shorter operational range) with 5000 tons lower displacement in the Littorios. The British got slower ships by a few knots in the KGV's but better gun power (10 tubes to 8), better actual armour (theirs was an all or nothing scheme unlike the turtleback of Bismarck which was less effective in almost every situation), and again, the British did this for 70000 tons lower displacement. The US North Carolinas were laid down about the same time, they were only completed later because the USN decided to redesign the ships mid build for 16 inch guns rather than the 14 inch guns that had originally been planned. As a result they were commissioned later. Again, slightly slower at the same 28 knots of the KGV's. but 9 16 inch rifles compared to the Bismarcks, and again on around 7000 tons lower displacement. The Bismarcks may have looked all powerful, but they were poorly designed and poorly optimised. With the same displacement the British, Americans and Italians would have ALL designed a far superior ship..... But then I suppose they were not as bad as the German Z Class Destroyers, which were garbage....

• 
  @mmccarthy9458 Жыл бұрын

  There is no doubt about it, the AI is atrocious: charging straight in with lousy gunnery. Try elite enemy gunnery in the options setting for more of a challenge. Bismarck and Scharny could have made it interesting by trying to distance themselves and making it a long range engagement where the Germans would have had somewhat of an advantage or lessen the British advantage. Scharnhorst's 11 inchers can only penetrate with plunging fire and the Germans had the fire control for long range.

• 
  @mnx_2852 Жыл бұрын

  Thanks for the heads up I’ll try that next

• 
  @alganhar1 Жыл бұрын

  How so? Scharnhorst is going to struggle at range with those 11 inch guns, even with plunging fire. At the kind of ranges you are suggesting to avoid the majority of the risk from those 16 inch rifles its doubtful she will be able to reach the British ships, let alone hit them. Which leaves the Bismark. Then you have a tube problem, 8 15 inch rifles against 18 16 inch rifles. Even if the Fire Control of the Nelson and Rodney are older, thus not as advanced that is more than double the number of guns, and while older, the Fire Control of the British Ships was still perfectly capable of hitting targets at those kind of ranges. Their only real option is to disengage and run, which they can do.

• 
  @PotatoSalad614 Жыл бұрын

  Wehraboos coping hard right now in the comments. Your 15 inch guns can’t beat 18x16 inch guns.

• 
  @MichaelClark-uw7ex Жыл бұрын

  German gunnery expertise is what sunk the Hood originally, I can't believe they couldn't get a single hit.