Пікірлер

• 
  @marshy252 сағат бұрын

  3:32 dude these questions are not hard at all. It's simple algebra, grade 10 stuff. Is this actually the type of questions??

• 
  @BeamNG.Scenes2 сағат бұрын

  so the Japanese men has the curiosity of a horn dog and the women are more confusing than the standard American women?

• 
  @xtsmbayi30283 сағат бұрын

  Host is probably Japanese African. 😅 Eyes gave it away lol

• 
  @beckyjolong62853 сағат бұрын

  She is so young to be a ceo

• 
  @gqgemini4 сағат бұрын

  Its Richardo 😅😅

• 
  @DigThat326 сағат бұрын

  Seems like it'd be good for me to travel to Japan to find a coo sista to date.

• 
  @montecristo21607 сағат бұрын

  Black people from other countries claiming black American culture in Japan and benefitting from it. SMH!

• 
  @MunchPremium7 сағат бұрын

  they do be acting like in anime ngl...who would have thought

• 
  @dariuslee6338 сағат бұрын

  Alabama girl

• 
  @ikoyDaPnoy8 сағат бұрын

  The dude with tattoos was bullied and seems to have alot of pent up rage as a result. I get the vibe that he has something to prove but at the same time he is trying to act like it hasn't phased him.

• 
  @michaelgregory68838 сағат бұрын

  “All around the world the same song.”

• 
  @Themusicalhealer8 сағат бұрын

  If you ask a woman here in America to pay any portion of the date, she definitly not talk to you again

• 
  @Themusicalhealer9 сағат бұрын

  Might have to slide to japan next year.

• 
  @StreetsofATL_199 сағат бұрын

  These are great stories!

• 
  @MadMax-cg6gh9 сағат бұрын

  Too bad, there were some really handsome dudes. Such a waste.

• 
  @Bigl1230x9 сағат бұрын

  Great video. Very insightful. Thank you

• 
  @michaelalexander14219 сағат бұрын

  Japan is a modern-day ethnostate. Racism, segregation, and inequality are all symptoms of that.

• 
  @Jarvis207710 сағат бұрын

  No matter what you tell me I won't go to Shibuya. IYKYK

• 
  @chapp570310 сағат бұрын

  It’s interesting to see the fetish question. The people who got the stereotypical “bad parts “did not feel the fetishization

• 
  @bryanwilson92811 сағат бұрын

  I realized that the secret to making a million is saving for a better investment. I always tell myself you don't need that new Maserati or that vacation just yet. That mindset helped me make more money investing. For example last year I invested 80k in stocks and made about $246k,but guess what? I put it all back and traded again and now I am rounding up close to a million

• 
  @kiimi.kls010 сағат бұрын

  You work for 40yrs to have $1m in your retirement, Meanwhile some people are putting just $10k in a meme coin for just few months and now they are multi millionaires. I pray that anyone who reads this will be successful in life

• 
  @PranatiSahoo-yg3gp10 сағат бұрын

  Thanks for continuing updates I'd rather trade the stock market as it's more profitable. I make an average of $34,500 per week even though I barely trade myself.

• 
  @Charlotte0384910 сағат бұрын

  I'm favoured financially, Thank you Jesus $32,000 weekly profit regardless of how bad it gets on the economy.

• 
  @sara_top8010 сағат бұрын

  How ..? Am a newbie in crypto investment, please can you guide me through on how you made profit?

• 
  @keithcarvey4810 сағат бұрын

  Thanks to Mrs Maria Davis.

• 
  @Kenny-tp7kr11 сағат бұрын

  Im.black i lived in Japan for 1 year.... I absolutely loved it the women where so sweet and respectful.

• 
  @nelsonassong831611 сағат бұрын

  Cameroon 🔥🔥

• 
  @user-wn7uj9is8q11 сағат бұрын

  ポンポコリンとSEEDAの振れ幅w

• 
  @thebigeurostepper12 сағат бұрын

  I think we have to take it all in context as a American are country is built on diversity so seeing some one of a different race or culture or ethnicity is not to strange but for many countries that’s not the case I think American are spoiled in that way

• 
  @tellmesomething241212 сағат бұрын

  This is a beautiful discussion.

• 
  @lacarpetrondukemarriott12 сағат бұрын

  People recognize patterns

• 
  @joshuaperkins762013 сағат бұрын

  This is pretty sad foreal.

• 
  @runningriot796313 сағат бұрын

  An indian working for an American compamy living in Japan, interesting person!

• 
  @LaceysHouseAfrica14 сағат бұрын

  In South Korea 🇰🇷 they barely started at me. In Ghana 🇬🇭 I’m light skin not mixed race and they stared pointed. Laughed called me YEVU dirty tricky dog and it was disgusting and abusive. I would pick South Korea 🇰🇷 any day. However they also didn’t want to serve me in some places in both Ghana and South Korea. I can’t stand how Black people are treated all over the world.

• 
  @puiakhiangte499615 сағат бұрын

  Me watching u r video how this man makes a million a day😮‍💨

• 
  @hado33_15 сағат бұрын

  get used to what? sitting in the car with your dad?

• 
  @moholera234015 сағат бұрын

  In 2024, anyone who is being ignorant is by choice, especially in first world countries like Japan, have internet and see these things they just choose to pick the negative things and stereotype people out of racism. Ignorance is just an excuse.

• 
  @djibrilcoulibaly94716 сағат бұрын

  "THEY MIGHT NOT BE WITH YOU FOR THE RIGHT REASON 😅😅😅"

• 
  @sippilandia16 сағат бұрын

  Blasians definitely act black

• 
  @Dom_om_nom13 сағат бұрын

  That's not true at all. There are Blasians born and raised in Asian countries who are pretty much the same as their fully Asian friends, family, and society. Sure, you could say that most (not all) Blasians raised in Western countries are typically closer to their black side culturally. Who do you think is more Asian, a Blasian born and raised in Japan, or an Asian American from the Bay Area?

• 
  @giadagiuggiola02727 сағат бұрын

  what do you mean "act" blacks? The Nippo9ija girl literally has the most Japanese attitude among them

• 
  @joelt100216 сағат бұрын

  Title says he makes 3.8M/day but video says he makes $1 million a month. Do you just make up random bullshit numbers on video titles for clicks?

• 
  @cabr117 сағат бұрын

  I wanted to see her being introduced to the rest of the candidates =(

• 
  @takeshikodama56718 сағат бұрын

  Why? Are you feeling "sorry" for the ones who didn't make it? Sasha and Harukaze were talking to each other, wasn't that enough? You wanna elimination challenge, is that the point of yours? Think about *Hell's Kitchen by Gordon Ramsay.* The show has a blind taste test of ingredients, do you remember that? It's not easy and GR may be better than those contestants but I don't know if he's the world's best when it comes to sense of smell. We have a lot of high end food or drink professional sniffers in this world. It's not that different. There were tasks/challenges and Harukaze is not a partial judge but *she speaks second language fluently and that makes her a good judge for this particular challenge of hearing the language and telling us how authentic it sounded.* *Do you remember the Miss Japan 2024 fiasco?* I thought about it again yesterday and I'm glad that the pageant itself was exposed as a shady business and the extramarital affair scandal that followed may have been a God's blessing. Her speech after receiving the crown itself was rather compelling. Then I was also watching a KZread video of hers getting a Japanese passport and it may have happened "after" she decided to be recognized as the best of "who would you like to sleep with?" beauty contest. Yes there seems to have been a female judge too and her comment was like "she is MORE Japanese than Japanese.". *If people failed to see Naturalization of Japan and this Americanized image of Birthright Citizenship as EQUAL, then none of them would be qualified to speak about this topic.* *Ariana Mamiko Miyamoto was Miss Universe Japan 2015.* Naomi Osaka is another famous Japanese although I don't usually follow anything about her. I think it was on one of those Miss Japan 2024 videos where I found comments about these two. The former was brought up by a black dude and the latter was of course mentioned negatively by a male Japanese fu*kwad. *JAPANESE ARE SO GODDAMN XENOPHOBIC AND RACIST.* The same historical and cultural PREJUDICE of the Japanese society can be found on *Human Rights Watch* website and mainly in academic studies of racism. What I found on HRW was about _Burakumin(village people)_ and it is about discrimination during Meiji era (1868 - 1912). It's the period of Westernization and cultural modernization. *It's not easy to relate to or find meaning in the history in this context of this comment but I believe it's something we should pay attention to.* --"I wanted to see her being introduced to the rest of the candidates =(" dunno whacha tryna say here. "We're ALL Japanese" girly talk is what you're asking here? ------------------------------------------------------------------- *Naturalization Oath of Allegiance to the United States of America* Oath _"I hereby declare, on oath, that _*_I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty,_*_ of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that _*_I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law;_*_ that I will perform noncombatant service in the _*_Armed Forces_*_ of the United States when required by the law; that _*_I will perform work of national importance_*_ under civilian direction when required by the law; _*_and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."_* *[ Chapter 3 - Oath of Allegiance Modifications and Waivers ]* 1. Modified Oath *for Religious or Conscientious Objections* Deletion of either or both of the following clauses: _"Bearing arms on behalf of the United States if required by law"_ _"Performing noncombatant service in the U.S. armed forces when required by law"_ *Testimony or Evidence:* *Must show opposition to clause (or clauses) based on religious training and belief or deeply held moral or ethical code. Applicant may provide an attestation or witness statement.* 2. Affirmation of Allegiance in Lieu of Oath Substitution of the words “solemnly affirm” for the words “on oath” and no recitation of the words “so help me God”. Testimony nor Evidence required. 3. Waiver of the Oath This is about medical exemption. --------------------------------------------------------- 宣誓書 私は、日本憲法及び法令を守り、定められた義務を履行し、善良な国民となることを誓います。 watashi wa, nihon kempō oyobi hōrei o mamori, sadamerareta gimu o rikō shi, zenryō na kokumin to naru koto o chikaimasu. Translated into English, this means: *Oath Statement* *_"I swear to obey the Constitution of Japan as well as its laws and ordinances, fulfilling the established duties, and become a good citizen."_* (There's only one *"duty"* - Article 30 - currently in the Japanese Constitution, by the way, and that's *paying taxes.* And sorry, non-Japanese are not exempt from that duty. Nor are you exempt from the tons of duties and responsibilities imposed by the associated laws and ordinances. There is also an *"obligation" to work according to Article 27,* and an obligation for *Japanese children to get an education according to Article 26)* *MOST ONLINE IDIOT JAPANESE DON'T OBEY THE CONSTITUTION OF JAPAN AND ITS LAWS/ORDINANCES, THEY'RE NOT RESPECTING THE CONSTITUTION, AND CERTAINLY NOT SUPPORTING OR DEFENDING THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. Good and Bad are a set, you must consider both in order to make a correct judgment with sound reasoning. So,,, too many Japanese just ignore this fundamental rules of logic. They're so dysfunctional, they can be either bad or "neither good nor bad". They're pretty much useless when it comes to Speech.* *It is sacrilegious, sanctimonious and downright disrespectful to the people of Japan.* You foreigners are no exceptions to this popular position. SANCTIMONIOUS synonyms: sacrilegious · sanctimonious · satanic · scandalous · sinful · unctuous · undutiful · unethical · unfaithful · ungodly · unhallowed · unholy · unregenerate hypocritical, insincere, pious, self-satisfied, smug, stuffy bigoted, canting, deceiving, false, goody-goody, holier-than-thou, pietistic, preachy, unctuous ------------------------------------------------------------ *_"It is not always the same thing to be a good man and a good citizen."_* -- *Aristotle* _"No one is born a good citizen or a good democrat or a good leader; _*_it takes time and education."_* -- Kofi Annan _"While we are zealously performing the duties of good citizens and soldiers, we certainly _*_ought not to be inattentive to the higher duties of religion._*_ To the distinguished character of Patriot, it should be our highest glory to add the _*_more distinguished character of Christian."_* -- George *Washington* *_"The World is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion."_* -- *Thomas Paine* _"My business is that of _*_every other good citizen_*_ - _*_to uphold the law."_* -- Arthur Conan Doyle _"The teaching of politics is that the Government, which was set for protection and comfort of all good citizens, becomes _*_the principal obstruction and nuisance with which we have to contend... The cheat and bully and malefactor we meet everywhere_*_ is the Government."_ -- Ralph Waldo *Emerson* _"My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."_ -- John F. *Kennedy* *_"A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the highest virtues of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation._*_ To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law would be to lose the law itself, _*_with life, liberty, property_*_ and all those who are enjoying them with us; _*_thus absurdly sacrificing the end to the means."_* -- Thomas *Jefferson* _"It has been well said that 'he who has never learned to obey cannot be a good commander.' The two are not the same, but _*_the good citizen ought to be capable of both; he should know how to govern like a freeman, and how to obey like a freeman - these are the virtues of a citizen."_* -- *Aristotle* _"It is now no more that _*_toleration is spoken of_*_ as if it were the indulgence of one class of people that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights, for, happily, the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection _*_should demean themselves as good citizens in giving it_*_ on all occasions their effectual support."_ -- George *Washington* *_In a 1790 letter, George Washington_*_ addressed a _*_Jewish congregation in Newport, Rhode Island._*_ He wrote that _*_the new nation he was helping build_*_ would give "to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance." Today, the letter is considered a stepping stone for _*_the First Amendment that would come the following year, in 1791._*

• 
  @vylet827017 сағат бұрын

  This is so chaotic. I'm glad some pointed out fetishism and how they don't take us seriously sometimes & would be really invasive. I feel for the girls here bc men no matter where you go are awful.

• 
  @suitelife2218 сағат бұрын

  What are the odds these Black people would actually date each other?

• 
  @bobbullethalf19 сағат бұрын

  I think blasians are great.

• 
  @dandee28Күн бұрын

  japanese women and japanese mentality in general is mcuh different than our westernized traditions. The women don't care how much money you have Very humble couple. Thanks for the video as it helps me think about what direction I want to go in life. I work full time with a job I love but i feel im not completely content with it. There must be more than just working 9-5

• 
  @seiichiroando3174Күн бұрын

  You guys are hilarious! " Im waiting for you to die so I can have your car"

• 
  @mehribmomenКүн бұрын

  This guy is the japanese version of top G but way more good looking.

• 
  @Ross-px9iyКүн бұрын

  She was born in Japan she's Japanese

• 
  @takeshikodama567121 сағат бұрын

  *"She was born in japan" -> "She is Japanese"* Is this what he's telling us? Can we reverse it? She's Japanese and she was born in Japan? *He's not saying it like being born in Japan makes her Japanese.* *Which it doesn't.* *Google Translation:* -> 彼女は日本で生まれた、日本人です Kanojo wa Nihon de umareta, nihonjindesu -> "She was born in Japan *and* is Japanese." *THIS IS HOW STUPID AND TWISTED YOUR BRAIN IS!!* *"I wasn't born in Japan. But I'm Japanese now!"* *This is perfectly fine and it illustrates how Nationality Law works in this country. THIS LEVEL OF CARELESSNESS, IGNORANCE AND STUPIDITY MAKES A PERSON A XENOPHOBE AND RACIST. I gotta say, I was quite impressed by the history of "the 14th". If anyone's interested, you can find it in my 10th reply here or you can just Google, "Why the United States Has Birthright Citizenship".* *"She was born in Japan. It's like she's Japanese." THIS IS STILL WRONG AS IN NOT BEING FACTUAL BUT IT IS ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE YOU CAN SEE SOME NUANCES INVOLVED IN THIS EXPRESSION. LANGUAGE CAN BE AMBIGUOUS LIKE THAT. AND THIS AMBIGUITY IS THE FALLACY I EXPLAINED IN OTHER POSTS AND IT IS CALLED EQUIVOCATION FALLACY. YOU NEED TO FOLLOW CERTAIN RULES FOR YOUR WORDS TO MAKE SENSE, YOU UNDERSTAND THAT, RIGHT?* Example: *"This flower was grown in Japan from its seed. It is Japanese!"* *"This dish was cooked in Japan. It is Japanese!"* *"This fruit was grown in Japan from its seed. This fruit is Japanese!"* *"Anime was born in Japan. All anime is Japanese."* *"She was born and She eats/shits/sleeps/rinses & repeats that in Japan. Someone like her can still CHOOSE, as a matter of fact she is required to choose a nationality." (What gives you the right to tell anyone who they are? As fu*king if your opinion is more important than their own opinion/identity about themselves? You're a fu*king moron, a people pleaser because you're still a mommy's boy with insecure attachment.)* *"Is she more Japanese? Or less Japanese? Just the right amount of Japanese (if she was born in Japan)? Just Japanese then? Isn't that your arbitrary rule? Your own selfish rule, isn't it? Is that a matter of public opinion? Do we get a vote for who she should be called? WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU'ER DOING? IT'S A SERIOUS QUESTION, ARE YOU ONE OF THOSE TYPICAL JAP PINHEAD WHO CAN'T EXPLAIN WHAT HE/SHE IS DOING?"* *WHAT YOU SAID IS JUST VAGUE AND AMBIGUOUS BULLSHIT. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT NOW? NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU WISH IT TO BE OR MEAN DIFFERENT, THE RULES OF LOGIC AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE WON'T ALLOW IT TO BE ANY DIFFERENT.* *DO YOU THINK ANYONE NEED APPROVAL FROM YOU TO BE SOMETHING OR SOMEONE? WHAT SORT OF POINT ARE YOU TRYING TO MAKE HERE WITH THAT ILLOGICAL COMMENT?* --"She was born in Japan" Probably true. --"She is Japanese" *That's just what you'd like to think. This guy's just simping, doesn't understand the law and he is a disgrace of this nation. By his definition, anyone who were born in Japan is Japanese regardless of how the person view her/himself. Like, this guy's thinking that he's doing her a favor. This is a guy who doesn't respect other people's autonomous decision making. This is neither a will of Japanese people laid out in our constitution nor what The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) agrees with.* ----------------------------------------------------------------- *Convention on the Rights of the Child* By: General Assembly resolution 44/25 Adopted: 20 November 1989 *THE INITIAL REPORT OF JAPAN UNDER ARTICLE 44, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD (May 30, 1996)* *(You can also read the final report if you really care.)* *IV.CIVIL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS* *A. Name and Nationality (art.7)* *The Right to be Registered* 72. *The Family Registration Law of Japan* requires submission of the notification of birth within 14 days after birth and stipulates that a child who assumes the surname of his/her father and mother shall be entered in the family register of the father and mother, a child who assumes his/her father's surname shall be registered in the father's family register, and a child who assumes his/her mother's surname shall be registered in the mother's family register. Provisions of Article 8 of the Residents Registration Act, furthermore, requires a child to be registered in the resident's card. 73. *A foreign child born in Japan is also required to be reported under the Family Registration Law.* Any person who finds a deserted child or any police officer who is informed of the finding of a deserted child shall, within 24 hours, give information thereof to the mayor of the city, town, or village. The mayor who has received the information shall give a full name to the deserted child, select the locality of register, and state in a record these facts as well as sex, presumptive date of birth, etc., to make a new family registration for the deserted child on the basis of the recorded matters. *SHE MAY NOT BE JAPANESE ANY LONGER. JUST BECAUSE YOU SAID SO DOESN'T MAKE HER JAPANESE. YOU'RE SELFISH EGOTISTICAL OPINION IS IRRELEVANT TO THE FACTS IN THIS REALITY WHICH EXISTS OUTSIDE OF YOUR BRAINWASHED HEAD.* *Article 11 Clause 1 of Japan's nationality law states* that a Japanese national who obtains another nationality by their own choice shall lose their Japanese citizenship. The law also requires *those who have dual citizenship from childhood* to choose one by the age of 20.

• 
  @takeshikodama567121 сағат бұрын

  *YOU SOUND UTTERLY UNEDUCATED. YOU'RE NOT A RESPECTABLE CITIZEN IF YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT CONSTITUTION. DON'T YOU REMEMBER LEARNING ABOUT THE SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORY WHEN YOU WERE STILL AT SCHOOL?* READ THE GODDAMNED CONSTITUTION. MEMORIZE ALL THE BASIC RIGHTS OF PEOPLE!!! CHAPTER III *RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF THE PEOPLE* *Article 10. The conditions necessary for being a Japanese national shall be determined by law.* Article 11. The people shall not be prevented from enjoying *any of the fundamental human rights.* These fundamental human rights guaranteed to the people by this Constitution shall be conferred upon the people of this and future generations as *eternal and inviolate rights.* Article 12. The freedoms and rights guaranteed to the people by this Constitution *shall be maintained by the constant endeavor of the people, who shall refrain from any abuse of these freedoms and rights* and *shall always be responsible* for utilizing them for the public welfare. Article 13. All of the people shall be *respected as individuals.* Their right to *life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness* shall, to the extent that it does not interfere with the public welfare, be the *supreme consideration in legislation* and in other governmental affairs. Article 14. All of the people are *equal under the law* and there *shall be no discrimination in political, economic or social relations* because of *race, creed, sex, social status or family origin.* Peers and peerage shall not be recognized. No privilege shall accompany any award of honor, decoration or any distinction, nor shall any such award be valid beyond the lifetime of the individual who now holds or hereafter may receive it. Article 15. The people have the *inalienable right* to choose their public officials and to dismiss them. All public officials are servants of the whole community and not of any group thereof. Universal adult suffrage is guaranteed with regard to the election of public officials. In all elections, secrecy of the ballot shall not be violated. A voter shall not be answerable, publicly or privately, for the choice he has made. Article 16. Every person shall have the right of *peaceful petition* for the redress of damage, for the removal of public officials, for the enactment, repeal or amendment of laws, ordinances or regulations and for other matters; nor shall any person be in any way discriminated against for sponsoring such a petition. Article 17. *Every person may sue for redress as provided by law* from the State or a public entity, in case he has *suffered damage through illegal act of any public official.* Article 18. *No person shall be held in bondage of any kind. Involuntary servitude, except as punishment for crime, is prohibited.* Article 19. *Freedom of thought and conscience shall not be violated.* Article 20. *Freedom of religion* is guaranteed to all. No religious organization shall receive any privileges from the State, nor exercise any political authority. No person shall be compelled to take part in any *religious act,* celebration, rite or practice. The State and its organs shall refrain from religious education or any other religious activity. Article 21. *Freedom of assembly* and association as well as *speech, press and all other forms of expression are guaranteed.* No censorship shall be maintained, nor shall the secrecy of any means of communication be violated. Article 22. Every person shall have *freedom to choose and change his residence* and to choose his occupation to the extent that *it does not interfere with the public welfare.* *Freedom of all persons to move to a foreign country and to divest themselves of their nationality shall be inviolate.* Article 23. *Academic freedom is guaranteed.* Article 24. *Marriage* shall be based only on the *mutual consent* of both sexes and it shall be maintained through mutual cooperation with the equal rights of husband and wife as a basis. With regard to choice of spouse, property rights, inheritance, choice of domicile, divorce and other matters pertaining to marriage and the family, laws shall be enacted *from the standpoint of individual dignity and the essential equality of the sexes.* Article 25. All people shall have the right to maintain the *minimum standards of wholesome and cultured living.* In all spheres of life, the State shall use its endeavors for the promotion and extension of *social welfare and security, and of public health.* Article 26. All people shall have the right to receive an *equal education correspondent to their ability, as provided by law.* All people shall be obligated to have all boys and girls under their protection receive ordinary education as provided for by law. Such *compulsory education shall be free.* Article 27. All people shall have the *right and the obligation to work.* *Standards* for wages, hours, rest and other working conditions *shall be fixed by law.* *Children shall not be exploited.* Article 28. *The right of workers to organize and to bargain and act collectively* is guaranteed. Article 29. *The right to own or to hold property is inviolable.* *Property rights* shall be defined by law, in conformity with the public welfare. Private property may be taken for public use upon just compensation therefor. Article 30. The people shall be *liable to taxation* as provided by law. Article 31. *No person shall be deprived of life or liberty, nor shall any other criminal penalty be imposed, except according to procedure established by law.* Article 32. *No person shall be denied the right of access to the courts.* Article 33. *No person shall be apprehended except upon warrant issued by a competent judicial officer which specifies the offense with which the person is charged, unless he is apprehended, the offense being committed.* Article 34. *No person shall be arrested or detained without being at once informed of the charges against him or without the immediate privilege of counsel; nor shall he be detained without adequate cause;* and upon demand of any person such cause must be immediately shown in open court in his presence and the presence of his counsel. Article 35. The right of all persons *to be secure in their homes, papers and effects against entries, searches and seizures shall not be impaired except upon warrant issued for adequate cause* and particularly describing the place to be searched and things to be seized, or except as provided by Article 33. Each search or seizure shall be made upon separate warrant issued by a competent judicial officer. Article 36. *The infliction of torture by any public officer and cruel punishments are absolutely forbidden.* Article 37. In all criminal cases *the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial tribunal.* He shall be permitted full opportunity to examine all witnesses, and he shall have the right of compulsory process for obtaining witnesses on his behalf at public expense. At all times the accused shall have the assistance of competent counsel who shall, if the accused is unable to secure the same by his own efforts, be assigned to his use by the State. Article 38. *No person shall be compelled to testify against himself.* *Confession made under compulsion, torture or threat, or after prolonged arrest or detention shall not be admitted in evidence.* *No person shall be convicted or punished in cases where the only proof against him is his own confession.* Article 39. No person shall be held criminally liable for an act which was lawful at the time it was committed, or of which he has been acquitted, nor shall he be placed in *double jeopardy.* Article 40. Any person, in case he is acquitted after he has been arrested or detained, *may sue the State for redress as provided by law.*

• 
  @takeshikodama567121 сағат бұрын

  *You're stupid. You need to write English properly. That's embarrassingly bad writing.* _"The phrase _*_"correlation does not imply causation"_*_ refers to the _*_inability to legitimately deduce a cause-and-effect relationship between two events or variables_*_ solely on the basis of an observed association or correlation between them. The idea that "correlation implies causation" is an example of _*_a questionable-cause logical fallacy,_*_ in which _*_two events occurring together_*_ are taken to have established a cause-and-effect relationship. This fallacy is also known by the Latin phrase _*_cum hoc ergo propter hoc ('with this, therefore because of this')._*_ This differs from the fallacy known as _*_post hoc ergo propter hoc ("after this, therefore because of this"),_*_ in which an event following another is seen as a necessary consequence of the former event, and from _*_conflation,_*_ the errant merging of two events, ideas, databases, etc., into one."_ *B causes A (reverse causation or reverse causality)* *Reverse causation* or *reverse causality* or *wrong direction* is an informal *fallacy of questionable cause* where cause and effect are reversed. The cause is said to be the effect and vice versa. *Third factor C (the common-causal variable) causes both A and B* *_"The third-cause fallacy_*_ (also known as _*_ignoring a common cause_*_ or questionable cause) is a logical fallacy in which a _*_spurious relationship_*_ is confused for causation. It asserts that X causes Y when in reality, both X and Y are caused by Z. It is a variation on the _*_post hoc ergo propter hoc_*_ fallacy and a member of the _*_questionable cause group of fallacies."_* *(I guess my initial intuition was correct. I was thinking about cause-and-effect first, then I tried to understand how this guy's mind work from his viewpoint and I almost ditched this explanation. You can't speak about reliable person's objective identification without physical evidence supporting the claim. This common-causal variable is of course how government(s) recognizes you as a part of any modern society.)* *Looks like I can't avoid explaining **_Post hoc_** here.* The term refers to a logical fallacy that because two events occurred in succession, the former event caused the latter event. Alternate names 1. Assuming the cause 2. *Faulty Causal Assumption* 3. Post hoc Form: P1: *X* happened before *Y.* P2: (unstated) *Y* was caused by something (that happened before Y). C: Therefore, *X* caused *Y.* Example: A man takes a vaccine and dies weeks later. *The cause is blamed* on the vaccine, instead of pre-existing health conditions. P1: *Birth+place* happened before *She* P2: (unstated) *She* was caused by something. (that happened before *She)* C: Therefore, Birth+place caused She *(The assumption is wrong and nothing's proven here.)* *Bidirectional causation: A causes B, and B causes A* I'm not explaining this. This guy doesn't know how to reason, that's the biggest problem and it doesn't have much to do with cause-and-effect. *The relationship between A and B is coincidental* The two variables are not related at all, but correlate by chance. The more things are examined, the more likely it is that two unrelated variables will appear to be related. *This kinda thinking could be a warm-up exercise for your brain.*

• 
  @takeshikodama567120 сағат бұрын

  *IGNORE MY COMMENTARY AND READ ON. YOU'RE BRAIN IS LIKE A ROBOTIC MACHINE. I'M NOT SEEING ANY HUMANLY CONSCIOUS ACTIVITY IN THAT COMMENT. YOUR ROBO ANSWER IS SO DISRESPECTFUL TO OTHERS. EITHER YOU WRITE LIKE A HUMAN OR LEARN MORE ABOUT WHAT YOU'RE DOING CURRENTLY BEFORE YOU DECIDE TO TALK TO OTHERS, DON'T YOU THINK THIS IS A GOOD IDEA AND A GROWN-ASS ADULT THING TO DO?* *Oversimplification* Definition: Oversimplification is the act of reducing the complexity of a subject or issue to a point where essential details are lost. It can lead to misunderstandings or misrepresentations by presenting a topic by simpler than it truly is. While it can make information more accessible, it risks omitting the critical aspects of the subject. Oversimplification Examples 1. *Overgeneralization* Overgeneralizations involve making *broad statements or conclusions* based on limited data or *specific instances.* By *painting with a broad brush,* generalizations can lead to misunderstandings and can misrepresent the *full scope of a situation.* People who suffer from overgeneralization often end up with *anxiety and depression* (El Bar et al., 2015) and enhanced *fear acquisition* (Zoladz et al., 2022). Example: “All teenagers are rebellious.” 2. *False Dichotomies* False dichotomies present only two options or solutions when, in reality, more exist. This type of oversimplification can limit critical thinking and *force unnecessary choices.* By *reducing complex issues to a binary* choice, it can lead to *polarized thinking* and overlook potential middle-ground or alternative solutions. (This applies to things you actually get to show but you need similar approach in ethical judgment as well.) Example: “You’re either with us or against us.” (aka us vs. them mentality) 3. *Stereotyping* Stereotyping refers to assigning specific characteristics *to an entire group* based on the *perceived traits of just a few* members. Stereotypes can *perpetuate biases* and prevent us from seeing the *unique* qualities and experiences of *individuals* within that group. In reality, most *social identities* are *far more complex.* It’s not so simple to *judge someone* by how they look! Example: “All blonde people are dumb.” (If it's an American women then, sure chances are that they're not smart at least on regular intellectual stuff unless they have some sort of respectable career.) 4. *Reductionism* Reductionism breaks down complex phenomena into simpler components, often ignoring the intricacies and interactions of the whole. Example: “Depression is solely due to a chemical imbalance in the brain.” (Their idea of Japanese, utterly unscientific view about other cultures, they do reduce the complexity like it's nothing. They just have this one dimensional and insignificant existence. We have two eyes and ears for good reasons. Good/Bad, positive and negative, it's all around us and if you're a grown-ass adult inside and as well as on the outside, you wouldn't be acting so extremely dumb. Maybe it's their opportunity to shine as this special something, forever thinking like they're the snowflake who never feels responsibility for the avalanche they could be causing with their brain dead comment.) 5. *One-Size-Fits-All Solutions* One-size-fits-all solutions propose a single answer or approach for a wide range of diverse problems or situations. Example: “The best way to teach all students is through lecture-based instruction.” (It's somewhat related to typical mentality of ordinary Japanese, and it's a one man groupthink. It boils down to self-identity issues.) 6. *Binary Thinking* Binary thinking categorizes things into *one of two opposing groups,* ignoring the possibility of a spectrum or continuum. By forcing things into *black-and-white categories,* it can lead to oversimplifications and misunderstandings. Example: *“People are either good or bad.”* (You can easily understand these super easy elementary cognitive blunders. It shares the common cause, which is YOU. You haven't challenged your own intellect, you never pushed hard enough and seen as far as it goes. Life only gets harder if you're not ready for it. Too much externalization is also your weakness of your cognition.) 7. *Equating Correlation With Causation* You’ve likely heard the phrase “correlation is not causation”. Equating correlation with causation assumes that because two things occur together, one must cause the other. Examplen: “Ice cream sales and drowning incidents both increase in the summer, so eating ice cream must cause drownings.” (This needs to be balanced with your knowledge of scientific methodology and understanding of statistics, induction and probabilistic analysis. And a proper phrase is written as *"correlation does not imply causation".)* 8. *Ignoring Exceptions* Sometimes people focus on the rule while disregarding any outliers or deviations. This is called ‘ignoring the exceptions’. Example: “All swans are white.” (ignoring the discovery of black swans in Australia) (Exception is something you make despite the rules that should cover it. You'll need a damn good reason for making an exception. This example sucks. Black swan or the black swan event need to be understood as *falsifiability.* It's an important concept in the *philosophy of science.)*

• 
  @takeshikodama567120 сағат бұрын

  *Continued from previous comment* 9. *Over-Reliance On Anecdotes* Over-reliance on *anecdotes* occurs when you place too much emphasis on *personal stories or isolated incidents* instead of *comprehensive data or broader evidence.* Basing conclusions *solely on anecdotes* can lead to *biased or inaccurate perceptions,* clouding our judgement and often leading to *unreasonable or disproportionate fear* and anxiety (Costill, 2016). Example: *“My grandfather* drank his whole life and lived to be 100, so Drinking *can’t be that bad.”* (Hearsay is another way to describe similar weak evidence. You'd be just believing in anything, any stupid rumors. Your own stupid stories too are anecdotal in some sense but *you're too invested in it.* When are you gonna grow up and talk like a normal human being?) 10. *Ignoring Context* Ignoring context means evaluating or judging something without considering the *surrounding circumstances or background.* Context provides the *necessary framework* to fully understand a situation, *event, or statement.* Without it, *interpretations* can be skewed, leading to misjudgments or misconceptions. Example: “He shouted aggressively at the meeting.” (without knowing that it was a passionate debate or that he was playing a role in a skit) (This is another stupid and lazy example. This author doesn't have much usable in-depth knowledge. Go read about *Contextualism* and you'll understand the seriousness of it. This example is like not reading the room or some shit, it's psychological. It's not ignoring. Context is all that matters. Whether you stick to the context or you can bring on relative interpretation to the context. People like you'd likely be taking things out of context. Getting the bigger picture, understanding your own reality, thinking out side of your usual "safe box" is what you need to be doing in this context.) 11. *Cherry-Picking Data* Cherry-picking data involves selecting specific pieces of information that support a particular argument while ignoring data that contradicts it. Cherry-picking is a common strategy in the age of polarized media, leading low-information media consumers into believing information that confirms their cognitive biases rather than helping them ascertain objective facts (LaMarche, 2014). Example: “This diet pill is effective; look at these *three success stories!”* (ignoring the hundreds of cases where it didn’t work). (A stupid American girl once told me, "You're cherry-picking!". This woman obviously didn't understand what it means. First of all, regular people like you and I won't be cherry-picking anything. I try to read academic papers sometimes but I don't understand the technical stuff. You need to get the rough idea about all things science, those journal publishers, *peer reviews'* pitfall and replication crisis and all that. *Conflicts of interests* is another big issue. Just try not to abuse this term.) 12. *Misrepresenting Scale Or Proportion* Misrepresenting scale or proportion means *exaggerating or minimizing* the importance, size, or extent of something relative to other factors. Example: “99% of users love our product!” (based on a *survey of only ten people,* nine of whom were positive). (Are you still pro-gene-therapy-shot? Most likely, you're only representing your emotional objection to something. You lack objectivity generally speaking.) 13. *Overlooking Nuances* Overlooking nuances means failing to recognize or consider the *subtle differences* or complexities in a situation. Example: “Learning a *language is just about* memorizing vocabulary and grammar rules.” (This list is messy and needlessly long. The author's categorical and organizational skills are quite low. He/she is using too much generic ideas for this list. You might wanna learn and memorize those common fallacies instead. I wouldn't call this example as an issue of not understanding nuances. There's no fixed answer. Some may say language is for communication. Go take a look and see what the *philosophy of language* is all about. What is a sociolinguistics? Who started talking about linguistic and when? How did it evolved? You must lay down the foundation of knowledge somehow. *Learning never stops* till the moment you die.) 14. *Ignoring Historical Context* Ignoring historical context happens when *we evaluate events, decisions, or actions* without *considering the time and circumstances in which they occurred.* Example: “Why did ancient civilizations not just use modern technology?” (This is laughable but most of your comments are no different. Nothing comes into existence out of nowhere. It's a given. Where else would you be looking if it's not in the historical whatever. The explanation and this example don't match up. Okay, if you wanna talk about that, imagine that you've been having a irreconcilable dispute with someone and you exhausted every avenues for reconciliation. If you still think you're being treated unfairly, you gotta take it to a court and make something happen if you believe in justice in this society. Who's responsible for explaining the historical context in this case? It depends on the subject matter and the aim of *problem-solving* and stuff.) 15. *Ignoring Underlying Causes* Ignoring underlying causes means focusing on the *surface-level symptoms or effects of a situation* without delving into the *root factors* that led to them. Example: “The city has a homelessness issue; *let’s just build more shelters.”* (without addressing the economic, societal, and health *factors contributing to* homelessness). *He definitely should investigate the root cause of his cosmic scale stupidity of his.*

• 
  @stephenpato5524Күн бұрын

  Great insights by my guy in the dreads 🤟🏼

• 
  @unkopower7899Күн бұрын

  excellent video

• 
  @takeshikodama5671Күн бұрын

  *Let us take a look at REAL RACISTS* We had two in this recent comment and I'd like to say a few things about that. They're both female, modern feminist type from developing countries. I've also noticed that young Japanese women with low English skills are really insensitive and clueless about the topic of Racism in general and I'm just hoping that y'all learn something about them. *(Easier way to look at this is woman being a woman, they love playing a victim card and act like this virtue-signaling attention seeking 403.* This hypothetical made-up idea of collective victimhood is their talk of reality and it's just what they've learned in their environment. You need to think a little more (self-)critically to help these sorry-ass losers with cognitive dissonance. Please refer to a term called Splitting(psychology) and perhaps 'Naive Realism' and/or Solipsism if you'd like to analyse them better and clearer.) 1. *Kunjika Singh* She's an *Indian female* judging by the name she was using. After responding to her post which would be the usual stupid ignorant nonsense saying "if she was born in Japan blah blah blah", *she deleted her comment.* It's something. I really don't hold back for things of this nature and I'm glad that she had a change of heart and I wish her best and hope that she keeps learning about prejudices, biases, and negative stereotypes that we all initially have. *India,* what do we know about them? I remember learning about a *caste system* and I researched it a bit before I talked her about that. *Human Rights Watch* or Amnesty International would be great resources to start you off and *Japan* was in that writing about the *problem of cast system* which we still seem to be affected by in some capacity in our society. So *Japan and India* have some similarities in this *social hierarchy* which some of us would like to get rid of. Japan's *English proficiency* is so bad and they ranked at *87th* in 2023, while India was ranked at *60th* which is a little lower than I was expecting. They both have less exposure to Westerners' thoughts because of the *language limitations.* They're both known for *Women and Men segregated public spaces* and that's because they have issues with *perverts and sexual predators* and although it may seem reasonable to some, *it's far from ideal* situation. *Separate "but" Equal ain't a solution.* *Modern regressed feminism is all about Hating Men.* It already started with the second wave of feminism and now it's spread all over the world because UN and all the left leaning medias love that stuff. The *ill of modern feminism* is dying down in the West but since Japan and many others are *slow to catch up* on many things, I guess the *stupidity is still in full swing* today. Read something like this too. *"Gandhi Is Deeply Revered, But His Attitudes On Race And Sex Are Under Scrutiny"* People say "Don't judge a book by its cover" and so many *resentful cowards* say things like *"I'm not even reading that!"* and this comes from both male and female. *Don't ever let them push you around.* If reading is too much for you and you need to take a break, you can also listen to a song titled *Bully by Eminem.* The world is full of assholes and it just makes me stronger, the key is not to overkill 'em. *_“When strong, appear weak. Brave, appear fearful. Orderly, appear chaotic. Full, appear empty. Wise, appear foolish. Many, appear to be few. Advancing, appear to retreat. Moving quickly, appear to be slow. Taking, appear to leave. In one place, appear to be in another.”_* ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War: Complete Texts and Commentaries 2. *Selena Cordeiro* She's a *Brazilian.* They're known for producing beautiful fashion models and some other stuff. You can still find her comment and the attitude she gave me with her poor English a few comments below this one. I think *her motivation* to have repeated that wrong idea about Japan's Nationality Act was *her "Whiteness".* She'd like to *frame it as anti-White racism with no evidence or arguments* to substantiate this *false accusation.* These women doesn't understand how the society works. *"I don't care about that crap. In my view......"* , this is what she said to me. People who visualize this *victim mentality* scenario doesn't understand the concept of *Burden of Proof* at all. *Some people including myself use real name and even with small online footprint in social media, we can still figure out what you're dealing with.* And you can either do your own research or read what I posted about the *history of racism* specific to this woman. Here's the basics in Japan-Brazil relationships. Brazil has the largest population of Japanese outside of Japan in the world. The immigration started in the early 1900s and you can just use Wikipedia for more information. Japan has had foreign workers from Brazil and they have some tensions there as well. A lot of what I was reading was new to me and I'm hoping that you find this *historical background of her racism* interesting too. Back in *16th century,* around the time of *_fumi-e (踏み絵, fumi "stepping-on" + e "picture"),_* Japan had to kill these *Christian motherfu*kers.* Considering her background, she should know more about human morality. *This is the EVIL of White Devils.* Her ancestors were *Slave traders* in Far East Asia. I also remember a news that went viral from a few years ago which was about this correspondence of fashion magazine employees between Brazil and Japan. *They sent Japanese colleagues a picture of themselves putting on a slit eyes.* Racism is evil in any shape or form and I won't be making a comparison to the US which I look at closely. The *anti-Japanese* thing was a little shocking yet not surprising if you think about it. -------------------------------------------------------------------- _"die Welt mehr bedroht ist durch die, welche das Uebel dulden oder ihm Vorschub leisten, als durch die Uebeltäter selbst."_ _"le monde court un plus grand danger de la part de ceux qui tolèrent le mal ou l’encouragent que de la part de ceux-là mêmes qui le commettent."_ *_"(He perceives very clearly that) the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it."_* _“The world is getting to be too dangerous a place to live in. It is not because of the men who do evil, but those who sit and let it happen.”_ _“The world is too dangerous to live in, not because of people’s evil deeds but because of those who sit and let it happen."_ _"the world is a dangerous place not because there are so many evil people in it, but because there are so many good ones willing to sit back and let evil happen."_ _"The world is a dangerous place to live - not because of the people who are evil but because of the people who don’t do anything about it."_ _“The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, out by those who watch them without doing anything.”_ _“The world is not dangerous because of those who do harm. It’s dangerous because of those who watch and do nothing.”_ _"In conclusion, Albert Einstein who _*_died in 1955_*_ deserves credit for the contents of the _*_1953 letter he wrote in German_*_ which is presented further above. A French translation appeared in “Conversations avec Pablo Casals” in 1955, and an English translation appeared in “Conversations with Casals” in 1956. _*_Distinct but thematically similar remarks began to appear in English by 1978._*_ QI(quote investigator) conjectures Einstein’s 1953 statement inspired the evolution of these variants."_

• 
  @takeshikodama56713 сағат бұрын

  *Simpler explanation of How these Racists thinks* _"The phrase _*_"correlation does not imply causation"_*_ refers to the _*_inability to legitimately deduce a cause-and-effect relationship between two events or variables_*_ solely on the basis of an observed association or correlation between them. The idea that "correlation implies causation" is an example of _*_a questionable-cause logical fallacy,_*_ in which _*_two events occurring together_*_ are taken to have established a cause-and-effect relationship. This fallacy is also known by the Latin phrase _*_cum hoc ergo propter hoc ('with this, therefore because of this')._*_ This differs from the fallacy known as _*_post hoc ergo propter hoc ("after this, therefore because of this"),_*_ in which an event following another is seen as a necessary consequence of the former event, and from _*_conflation,_*_ the errant merging of two events, ideas, databases, etc., into one."_ *B causes A (reverse causation or reverse causality)* *Reverse causation* or *reverse causality* or *wrong direction* is an informal *fallacy of questionable cause* where cause and effect are reversed. The cause is said to be the effect and vice versa. (If Japanese is the first language, their logic is weaker. I cannot learn the exact same fallacy in Japanese, it's too difficult to read. This reverse order is often permissible in Japanese because the person/subject is assumed in the context and not explicitly stated. Aside from thinking about Causation, what they say gives off wrong impressions because they pay less attention to the order.) *Third factor C (the common-causal variable) causes both A and B* *_"The third-cause fallacy_*_ (also known as _*_ignoring a common cause_*_ or questionable cause) is a logical fallacy in which a _*_spurious relationship_*_ is confused for causation. It asserts that _*_X_*_ causes _*_Y_*_ when in reality, both _*_X_*_ and _*_Y_*_ are caused by _*_Z._*_ It is a variation on the _*_post hoc ergo propter hoc_*_ fallacy and a member of the _*_questionable cause group of fallacies."_* *(I guess my initial intuition was correct. I was thinking about cause-and-effect first, then I tried to understand how their mind work from his/her viewpoint and I almost ditched this explanation. You can't speak about reliable person's objective identification without physical evidence supporting the claim. This common-causal variable is of course how government(s) and its people recognize you as a part of any modern society. THIS COMMON-CAUSE IS NOT A FALLACY, AND IT IS ACTUALLY A CAUSE AND EVIDENCE FOR SOMEONE'S TRUE IDENTITY.)* *Looks like I can't avoid explaining **_Post hoc_** here.* The term refers to a logical fallacy that because two events occurred in succession, the former event caused the latter event. Alternate names 1. Assuming the cause 2. *Faulty Causal Assumption* 3. Post hoc Form: P1: *X* happened before *Y.* P2: (unstated) *Y* was caused by something (that happened before Y). C: Therefore, *X* caused *Y.* Example: A man takes a vaccine and dies weeks later. *The cause is blamed* on the vaccine, instead of pre-existing health conditions. P1: *Birth+place* happened before *She* P2: (unstated) *She* was caused by something. (that happened before *She)* C: Therefore, Birth+place caused She *(The assumption is wrong and nothing's proven here.)* *Bidirectional causation: A causes B, and B causes A* I'm not explaining this. This guy doesn't know how to reason, that's the biggest problem and it doesn't have much to do with cause-and-effect. *The relationship between A and B is coincidental* The two variables are not related at all, but correlate by chance. The more things are examined, the more likely it is that two unrelated variables will appear to be related.

• 
  @UnknownSend3rКүн бұрын

  Crazy that all the non Japanese songs were from UK artists. Central cee in Tokyo university is crazy.

• 
  @Ryangirl2000Күн бұрын

  Isn’t Gangnam Style Korean?

• 
  @takeshikodama5671Күн бұрын

  Yes, it is but that was world wide sensation. There are skilled promoters from the US working in the industry to push Korean entertainment industries to the mainstream in the West. *What was the exact question asked?*

• 
  @proceonproceon6233Күн бұрын

  Here's an idea why don't these young black people meet and date of the black people whilst abroad in Japan

• 
  @IjustmakecartoonsКүн бұрын

  This video is kinda sad…