Are you serious? minutes two in and you show a set of torpedo tubes the like that was used on British Destroyers of WWII !!! Why do sooooo many of the channels just: Steal videos and repost with very poor running comentary? .... The same video's just keep getting reposted time after time! You lot are Not content creators, .. You are plain and simple: Coppy-Cats. Click-Baiters. Oh well, Just another Block and thumbs down.
@Dagase9022 сағат бұрын
🇪🇸💪🏼
@Dewiart16Күн бұрын
What a stupid video - we have no proper navy now.
@andyf4292Күн бұрын
that starstreak missile is ace. it would be like having 3 ww2 churchill tanks shoot your apc/helicopter or plane
@andyf4292Күн бұрын
even an A10 or apache would be obliterated
@NineSeptims7 сағат бұрын
@@andyf4292 I seen a video of a ka50 literally cut in half by that missile.
@craigshaw53452 күн бұрын
So it's a Ty31 on a budget, which was already a Ty26 on a budget. Good plan! 🤦
@jalesvevajayamare71982 күн бұрын
In the realm of aviation, Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) helicopters represent a significant leap forward, offering unique advantages over traditional aircraft. These advanced helicopters, capable of taking off, hovering, and landing vertically, promise to revolutionize both commercial and military aviation sectors. The argument for adopting VTOL technology hinges on three main pillars: operational flexibility, urban mobility, and environmental benefits 😘🥰😘🥰😘🥰
@duncanprice30882 күн бұрын
A dozen ? What a joke ! 120 would be meaningful. Still, a dozen should be able to protect the 3 challenger 3 tanks the UK will eventually be able to fund.
@jasoncoyle29532 күн бұрын
Another waste of money! I like the starstreak missile but this platform is pants against drones or fpv. Would have been better to save the money for a better program.
@Scaleyback3173 күн бұрын
The unions will mess up the shipyards. The bean counters will spend the next ten years cutting things off the capabilities list, the Admiralty will change their minds a hundred times about what will power it, what it will be used for, costs will quadruple and times will be stretched into the 2040's. Heard this merry go round of blxnbs many times over the years. Merely a case of here we go again.
@antonystrong25583 күн бұрын
Hope the government of UK do not cancel it
@MrAndygray84 күн бұрын
A dozen. That’ll terrify Putin. 😂
@jameshughes68005 күн бұрын
all bollocks why would you buy that shite when you could attach it to any other vehicle frame in the british army fuckin bollocks up the english
@barenekid96955 күн бұрын
Let me Guess ? Pre rusted out ?
@Bigdangleebles6 күн бұрын
12??? Are you shitting me. So that could realistically cover a 25 mile front. The Ukrainians are fighting on 600 miles with hundreds of systems and are begging for more, plus the attritional factor added to that. . In addition to a handful of stormers we have left, if the SHTF we don’t have enough SHORAD cover. They still aren’t getting it!!! Ffs
@andylees29406 күн бұрын
Lol pathetic, they bought 12… what a joke. If the bought 1000 then you’d know they were serious, but measly 12 - you can’t cover jack s### w 12. 😂😂😂
@yyyfffff333336 күн бұрын
12 ! The Russians will be shitting themselves .
@joemerican57815 күн бұрын
You don’t understand the concept of NATO, do you? The British Army will never be required to take on another nation singlehanded, and hasn’t been configured to do so for decades. It has been configured to be the very sharp tip of a very large spear. So, 12 units to replace 6 Strikers, is a fair exchange.
@peterjones-b5bКүн бұрын
@@joemerican5781 so by your logic i need not get a burgler alarm system because my neighbours have got my back ? .... or why bother with a smoke alarm ? my neighbours will notice the smoke and warn me ! and lets not bother with a rape alarm for my wife .. the neighbours will rescue her if i'm not capable of doing so ! ... its that kind of wooly minded logic that has got us into the situation we find ourselves in at the moment !
@BigBikeMad-ox8vo6 күн бұрын
Nowhere near enough....should be at least 60 units.
@owenlerry63395 күн бұрын
They have already stated this is a interim solution to cover the stormers we have gifted Ukraine.
@robertbritt5316 күн бұрын
Wow a dozen!! wonder how long 12 would last when the war starts? Why bother at 12 FFS
@pdarley586 күн бұрын
Why mount on a totally new vehicle rather than a type already in service???
@garyyoung31796 күн бұрын
VAMTACS are widely used and currently in production. The CVR(T) on which Stormer is based is no longer in production. These are an interim purchase while a new system is developed.
@SteveJones-om6ks6 күн бұрын
Only 12 being ordered. Not sensible to pay to integrate the Rapid Ranger turret with Foxhound unless we know we’re ordering a good number. Hopefully Rapid Ranger impresses and that plays out as these need to be added to the Strike Brigades at Regt level.
@Bigdangleebles6 күн бұрын
@@SteveJones-om6ksSpot on Mate!
@user-ei3dq2dw6i6 күн бұрын
Wow juet 12 what a joke for British army
@markgrehan37266 күн бұрын
The British military really seems lacking in air defense for some reason.
@SteveJones-om6ks6 күн бұрын
Historically it was down to the fact we expected to either be fighting under friendly air cover or fighting opposition with little air power. We had battlefield VSHORADS and some point defence Rapiers but the air battle was the RAFs.
@kenmurphy77185 күн бұрын
It's a horrible knock-on from end of cold war when every government cut defence spending , and here we are today with a belligerent russian bogeyman .
@keithkellett33635 күн бұрын
Including a small amount of suitable aircraft.. Let alone just a dozen of these vehicles Some protection, eh ?
@jammiedodger70405 күн бұрын
That didn’t used to be the case when they had the Markman. Hopefully will get tracked boxer soon and we will get a Anti-Air boxer module.
@knowahnosenothing48623 күн бұрын
@@SteveJones-om6ks Now it's the infantryman's let alone bigger ground assets like Armor with drone warfare.
@bennramnarine33957 күн бұрын
Hopefully, this order will be followed by further orders. This is a proven platform and system and its saves in development and procurement costs
@user-jy2lr6oh9z7 күн бұрын
Why only 12
@jamaalromain50367 күн бұрын
Probably due to budget
@Stroopwaffe16 күн бұрын
That hilarious isn't it ? 12 ffs. Ps thinking about it, it's prolly just for covering London or the PM, king or Prince of Wales, just the vip bits.
@SteveJones-om6ks6 күн бұрын
It said on the video. They’re replacing 6 Stormer tracks sent to Ukraine. 12 launchers over 6 means more targets engaged simultaneously so it’s a step up.
@flyingdutchman77577 күн бұрын
The Starstreak is considered one of the most advanced and capable man-portable air defense systems available, renowned for its speed, accuracy, and ability to counter a variety of airborne targets.
@andyf4292Күн бұрын
and its laser guided, so you can't jam it and it's very fast
@newton183117 күн бұрын
But will they stop Rubber Dinghy's.
@robimusprime87 күн бұрын
When the original Dune music kicks in……
@SuperBigwinston8 күн бұрын
40 to 60.000 a year of asylum pirates crossing from France. The British navy and armed forces wont stop them. So wasting money on new boats seems rather pointless.
@StarrDust010 күн бұрын
I really hope one day we can retire these real wmd's....because it'd be sad to destroy our amazing planet. If we went to war with China, it'll be a nuclear exchange, nobody could 'win' that...basically we all lose and our planet will look like the wasteland we've seen in 'The 100' (amazing show btw). But still it's good to have a nuclear 'Ace' in your back pocket, until we humans can learn to get along and live in permanent peace.
@paullowden164313 күн бұрын
Probably won’t get off the drawing board now that there’s a new government in power.
@davidbell301613 күн бұрын
Overall RN down 74% since cold war ceased
@johnmarkey486216 күн бұрын
Great
@DaveSCameron16 күн бұрын
Must’ve been created by a Scouser..👍☘️📚
@trevorhart54517 күн бұрын
Type 32 is either A Type 31 "MODIFIED" so that it is built above cost price but some "changes" OR it is One of BoJo the Clown PM Gaffes where Brain is never engaged while mouth is in action. It does appear that it may be a combination of both. Type 83 Destroyer we know Nothing about and Q. Why Type 83 not 85? The enhanced Air Defence type 42 Destroyer became the Type 82 which was cancelled as HMS Bristol was been completed. BoJo Gaffe resulting in a PANIC to come up with a pretend Type 32 that can be later cancelled in order to afford just 5 Type 83 Destroyers?
@Jan-qg1iy18 күн бұрын
[6:19] HMS KING GEORGE VI - is *[KING GEORGE THE SIXTH].*
@barrymiller338519 күн бұрын
No new information here. And, of course, our new government is not known for its support of the Royal Navy.
@nickmail760419 күн бұрын
Rubbish main weapon.
@alunrees513021 күн бұрын
As the Grim Reaper KZread has shown that China's tactic in the Type 055 is to out muscle and use longer distance weapons showing that the UK Type 45 Destroyer can be destroyed even with the resent upgrade in number of weapons
@timothyseabrook158422 күн бұрын
Angle decks are pointless for STOVL aircraft!
@Liam199224 күн бұрын
Thats why people dont understand power in countrys, china maybe the largest but the uk is the size of some states in america and we are one of the biggest threats in the world, if anyone decided to nuke us our submarines and land based defense systems are ahead of most of any countrys in the world, history has taught everyone, dont fuck with the british, we ALWAYS WIN
@sparkiegaz361325 күн бұрын
Get them working first be great 😂
@reserva12026 күн бұрын
The recent election - show that the British voters are on a suicidal death cult - do very stupid
@ENGBriseB26 күн бұрын
The UK has the money to put a missile system on our Aircraft carriers.
@painfulorwhat887224 күн бұрын
Not now the government has changed.
@mikestarkey798926 күн бұрын
The government wanted to cut construction costs, so the missile defence went! To the families of the sailors on board, that's how much your government thinks about lives of your family!
@lingth26 күн бұрын
Dun worry UK aircraft carriers will probably Hide behind their Bigger Brothers the US carrier groups for protection.. 😊 A US Wasp class Amphibious assault ship with F-35B would probably match a UK carrier with F-35B and even they have Rolling Airframe Missiles and Sea Sparrows..
@arthurbaldwin180426 күн бұрын
Let’s stop kidding ourselves. Our navy is just a public relations exercise. Just brought out on show enough to keep the public cocooned in the myth we can defend ourselves. We can’t afford shit anymore.
@stephennelmes455726 күн бұрын
We got the wrong type of carrier, the wrong type of F35, and the wrong airborne early warning AEW aircraft.... And no self-defense missiles. Brilliant. We should have had angled flight decks, catapult, and arrestor wires. With this arrangement, we could have bought the F35 C, which is designed for aircraft carriers instead of the F35 B, which is designed for the Marines. Cats and traps also enable the use of fixed wing AEW aircraft carrying a more powerful radar to a higher altitude with longer endurance that can see further. The F35 aircraft carry out combat air patrols in the fighter engagement zone many miles from the carrier. It is there to interdict the enemy aircraft before they can fire their missiles. The CAP operates in conjunction with the AEW and the fighter controller in the operations room on the carrier. Without catapults and arrestor ( cats and traps ) wires, we are limited to the F35 B, which carries less fuel because of the vertical launch gear onboard, hence more weight, less missiles and less endurance. It can get out to its CAP station, loiter for a short time before having to return to refuel. Again, with cats and traps, fixed wing AEW aircraft could be embarked instead of the helicopters, which can't fly as far as fast or as high. Thus limiting the radar coverage of the battle group. In my opinion, these carriers were ill conceived from the start. Now we have carriers, fighters and AEW systems that are just as expensive and less capable. If we ever got to war alongside the American carriers it must be noted that we can land the F35 B on their flight decks but without arrestor wires and catapults they are unable to land their F35 C on ours. Look at the now thankfully decommissioned Type 22 ( batch 2 ) frigate and it's woefully inadequate weapons. This class of ship typifies MOD thinking.
@flyingdutchman775727 күн бұрын
I’d like to say the HMS Queen Elizabeth isn’t currently in service she isn’t expected to be in combat and is therefore not loaded for combat operations, what is known is that once she is and Sea Captor has finished trials, it is likely several sea captor ‘pods’ will be placed on hardpoints on the vessels. Currently she has the Land Based Version parked on her deck.
@moodogco27 күн бұрын
This argument is abit pointless & imo is a lack of understanding of how the aircraft carriers will be operated etc as there is no circumstances where it'll be sailing anywhere without the carrier strike group!! It will never sail without 2x type 45 air defence destroyers (they only there for this job & was y they was built), a anti submarine frigate & a astute nuclear sub so y does it need this extra systems? Plus they have f35 stealth aircraft as well
@mac262627 күн бұрын
More warships being built in the U.K. for the Royal Navy is always going to be a good thing.🇬🇧
@mac262627 күн бұрын
Successive governments have already shortchanged the Royal Navy by not sticking with angled decks, Cats & Traps. Now they won’t spend a few million pounds, for a decent last line of defence? It’s criminal what has been done to our navy.
@lingth26 күн бұрын
I wonder if they have enough F-35B to staff both carriers even
@danielh403225 күн бұрын
I read that some Navy top brass - West probably - didn’t want the angled deck, etc. as it ran the risk of getting cheaper planes than the F35 and the brass wanted the F35 as the shiniest toy. The real problem with the carriers is that they were meant to be part of a multinational European carrier group but the other participants didn’t build their ships due to financial constraints and we were stuck building the carriers as too much money had been sunk into them. Now total white elephants, despite the BS from some old Navy brass - Putin scared of the UK because it has two carriers? Totally delusional.
@mac262621 күн бұрын
@@danielh4032 I honestly think you might well be the one that’s a tad delusional dude.
Пікірлер
Are you serious? minutes two in and you show a set of torpedo tubes the like that was used on British Destroyers of WWII !!! Why do sooooo many of the channels just: Steal videos and repost with very poor running comentary? .... The same video's just keep getting reposted time after time! You lot are Not content creators, .. You are plain and simple: Coppy-Cats. Click-Baiters. Oh well, Just another Block and thumbs down.
🇪🇸💪🏼
What a stupid video - we have no proper navy now.
that starstreak missile is ace. it would be like having 3 ww2 churchill tanks shoot your apc/helicopter or plane
even an A10 or apache would be obliterated
@@andyf4292 I seen a video of a ka50 literally cut in half by that missile.
So it's a Ty31 on a budget, which was already a Ty26 on a budget. Good plan! 🤦
In the realm of aviation, Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) helicopters represent a significant leap forward, offering unique advantages over traditional aircraft. These advanced helicopters, capable of taking off, hovering, and landing vertically, promise to revolutionize both commercial and military aviation sectors. The argument for adopting VTOL technology hinges on three main pillars: operational flexibility, urban mobility, and environmental benefits 😘🥰😘🥰😘🥰
A dozen ? What a joke ! 120 would be meaningful. Still, a dozen should be able to protect the 3 challenger 3 tanks the UK will eventually be able to fund.
Another waste of money! I like the starstreak missile but this platform is pants against drones or fpv. Would have been better to save the money for a better program.
The unions will mess up the shipyards. The bean counters will spend the next ten years cutting things off the capabilities list, the Admiralty will change their minds a hundred times about what will power it, what it will be used for, costs will quadruple and times will be stretched into the 2040's. Heard this merry go round of blxnbs many times over the years. Merely a case of here we go again.
Hope the government of UK do not cancel it
A dozen. That’ll terrify Putin. 😂
all bollocks why would you buy that shite when you could attach it to any other vehicle frame in the british army fuckin bollocks up the english
Let me Guess ? Pre rusted out ?
12??? Are you shitting me. So that could realistically cover a 25 mile front. The Ukrainians are fighting on 600 miles with hundreds of systems and are begging for more, plus the attritional factor added to that. . In addition to a handful of stormers we have left, if the SHTF we don’t have enough SHORAD cover. They still aren’t getting it!!! Ffs
Lol pathetic, they bought 12… what a joke. If the bought 1000 then you’d know they were serious, but measly 12 - you can’t cover jack s### w 12. 😂😂😂
12 ! The Russians will be shitting themselves .
You don’t understand the concept of NATO, do you? The British Army will never be required to take on another nation singlehanded, and hasn’t been configured to do so for decades. It has been configured to be the very sharp tip of a very large spear. So, 12 units to replace 6 Strikers, is a fair exchange.
@@joemerican5781 so by your logic i need not get a burgler alarm system because my neighbours have got my back ? .... or why bother with a smoke alarm ? my neighbours will notice the smoke and warn me ! and lets not bother with a rape alarm for my wife .. the neighbours will rescue her if i'm not capable of doing so ! ... its that kind of wooly minded logic that has got us into the situation we find ourselves in at the moment !
Nowhere near enough....should be at least 60 units.
They have already stated this is a interim solution to cover the stormers we have gifted Ukraine.
Wow a dozen!! wonder how long 12 would last when the war starts? Why bother at 12 FFS
Why mount on a totally new vehicle rather than a type already in service???
VAMTACS are widely used and currently in production. The CVR(T) on which Stormer is based is no longer in production. These are an interim purchase while a new system is developed.
Only 12 being ordered. Not sensible to pay to integrate the Rapid Ranger turret with Foxhound unless we know we’re ordering a good number. Hopefully Rapid Ranger impresses and that plays out as these need to be added to the Strike Brigades at Regt level.
@@SteveJones-om6ksSpot on Mate!
Wow juet 12 what a joke for British army
The British military really seems lacking in air defense for some reason.
Historically it was down to the fact we expected to either be fighting under friendly air cover or fighting opposition with little air power. We had battlefield VSHORADS and some point defence Rapiers but the air battle was the RAFs.
It's a horrible knock-on from end of cold war when every government cut defence spending , and here we are today with a belligerent russian bogeyman .
Including a small amount of suitable aircraft.. Let alone just a dozen of these vehicles Some protection, eh ?
That didn’t used to be the case when they had the Markman. Hopefully will get tracked boxer soon and we will get a Anti-Air boxer module.
@@SteveJones-om6ks Now it's the infantryman's let alone bigger ground assets like Armor with drone warfare.
Hopefully, this order will be followed by further orders. This is a proven platform and system and its saves in development and procurement costs
Why only 12
Probably due to budget
That hilarious isn't it ? 12 ffs. Ps thinking about it, it's prolly just for covering London or the PM, king or Prince of Wales, just the vip bits.
It said on the video. They’re replacing 6 Stormer tracks sent to Ukraine. 12 launchers over 6 means more targets engaged simultaneously so it’s a step up.
The Starstreak is considered one of the most advanced and capable man-portable air defense systems available, renowned for its speed, accuracy, and ability to counter a variety of airborne targets.
and its laser guided, so you can't jam it and it's very fast
But will they stop Rubber Dinghy's.
When the original Dune music kicks in……
40 to 60.000 a year of asylum pirates crossing from France. The British navy and armed forces wont stop them. So wasting money on new boats seems rather pointless.
I really hope one day we can retire these real wmd's....because it'd be sad to destroy our amazing planet. If we went to war with China, it'll be a nuclear exchange, nobody could 'win' that...basically we all lose and our planet will look like the wasteland we've seen in 'The 100' (amazing show btw). But still it's good to have a nuclear 'Ace' in your back pocket, until we humans can learn to get along and live in permanent peace.
Probably won’t get off the drawing board now that there’s a new government in power.
Overall RN down 74% since cold war ceased
Great
Must’ve been created by a Scouser..👍☘️📚
Type 32 is either A Type 31 "MODIFIED" so that it is built above cost price but some "changes" OR it is One of BoJo the Clown PM Gaffes where Brain is never engaged while mouth is in action. It does appear that it may be a combination of both. Type 83 Destroyer we know Nothing about and Q. Why Type 83 not 85? The enhanced Air Defence type 42 Destroyer became the Type 82 which was cancelled as HMS Bristol was been completed. BoJo Gaffe resulting in a PANIC to come up with a pretend Type 32 that can be later cancelled in order to afford just 5 Type 83 Destroyers?
[6:19] HMS KING GEORGE VI - is *[KING GEORGE THE SIXTH].*
No new information here. And, of course, our new government is not known for its support of the Royal Navy.
Rubbish main weapon.
As the Grim Reaper KZread has shown that China's tactic in the Type 055 is to out muscle and use longer distance weapons showing that the UK Type 45 Destroyer can be destroyed even with the resent upgrade in number of weapons
Angle decks are pointless for STOVL aircraft!
Thats why people dont understand power in countrys, china maybe the largest but the uk is the size of some states in america and we are one of the biggest threats in the world, if anyone decided to nuke us our submarines and land based defense systems are ahead of most of any countrys in the world, history has taught everyone, dont fuck with the british, we ALWAYS WIN
Get them working first be great 😂
The recent election - show that the British voters are on a suicidal death cult - do very stupid
The UK has the money to put a missile system on our Aircraft carriers.
Not now the government has changed.
The government wanted to cut construction costs, so the missile defence went! To the families of the sailors on board, that's how much your government thinks about lives of your family!
Dun worry UK aircraft carriers will probably Hide behind their Bigger Brothers the US carrier groups for protection.. 😊 A US Wasp class Amphibious assault ship with F-35B would probably match a UK carrier with F-35B and even they have Rolling Airframe Missiles and Sea Sparrows..
Let’s stop kidding ourselves. Our navy is just a public relations exercise. Just brought out on show enough to keep the public cocooned in the myth we can defend ourselves. We can’t afford shit anymore.
We got the wrong type of carrier, the wrong type of F35, and the wrong airborne early warning AEW aircraft.... And no self-defense missiles. Brilliant. We should have had angled flight decks, catapult, and arrestor wires. With this arrangement, we could have bought the F35 C, which is designed for aircraft carriers instead of the F35 B, which is designed for the Marines. Cats and traps also enable the use of fixed wing AEW aircraft carrying a more powerful radar to a higher altitude with longer endurance that can see further. The F35 aircraft carry out combat air patrols in the fighter engagement zone many miles from the carrier. It is there to interdict the enemy aircraft before they can fire their missiles. The CAP operates in conjunction with the AEW and the fighter controller in the operations room on the carrier. Without catapults and arrestor ( cats and traps ) wires, we are limited to the F35 B, which carries less fuel because of the vertical launch gear onboard, hence more weight, less missiles and less endurance. It can get out to its CAP station, loiter for a short time before having to return to refuel. Again, with cats and traps, fixed wing AEW aircraft could be embarked instead of the helicopters, which can't fly as far as fast or as high. Thus limiting the radar coverage of the battle group. In my opinion, these carriers were ill conceived from the start. Now we have carriers, fighters and AEW systems that are just as expensive and less capable. If we ever got to war alongside the American carriers it must be noted that we can land the F35 B on their flight decks but without arrestor wires and catapults they are unable to land their F35 C on ours. Look at the now thankfully decommissioned Type 22 ( batch 2 ) frigate and it's woefully inadequate weapons. This class of ship typifies MOD thinking.
I’d like to say the HMS Queen Elizabeth isn’t currently in service she isn’t expected to be in combat and is therefore not loaded for combat operations, what is known is that once she is and Sea Captor has finished trials, it is likely several sea captor ‘pods’ will be placed on hardpoints on the vessels. Currently she has the Land Based Version parked on her deck.
This argument is abit pointless & imo is a lack of understanding of how the aircraft carriers will be operated etc as there is no circumstances where it'll be sailing anywhere without the carrier strike group!! It will never sail without 2x type 45 air defence destroyers (they only there for this job & was y they was built), a anti submarine frigate & a astute nuclear sub so y does it need this extra systems? Plus they have f35 stealth aircraft as well
More warships being built in the U.K. for the Royal Navy is always going to be a good thing.🇬🇧
Successive governments have already shortchanged the Royal Navy by not sticking with angled decks, Cats & Traps. Now they won’t spend a few million pounds, for a decent last line of defence? It’s criminal what has been done to our navy.
I wonder if they have enough F-35B to staff both carriers even
I read that some Navy top brass - West probably - didn’t want the angled deck, etc. as it ran the risk of getting cheaper planes than the F35 and the brass wanted the F35 as the shiniest toy. The real problem with the carriers is that they were meant to be part of a multinational European carrier group but the other participants didn’t build their ships due to financial constraints and we were stuck building the carriers as too much money had been sunk into them. Now total white elephants, despite the BS from some old Navy brass - Putin scared of the UK because it has two carriers? Totally delusional.
@@danielh4032 I honestly think you might well be the one that’s a tad delusional dude.